Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Adann-Kennn J. Alexxandar Movie Reviews: “Mickey 17” – Valdosta Daily Times

Published

on

Adann-Kennn J. Alexxandar Movie Reviews: “Mickey 17” – Valdosta Daily Times

Adann-Kennn J. Alexxandar Movie Reviews: “Mickey 17”

Published 8:14 pm Tuesday, March 11, 2025

By Adann-Kennn J. Alexxandar

“Mickey 17” (Dark Comedy/Science-Fiction: 2 hours, 17 minutes)

Starring: Robert Pattinson, Steven Yeun, Naomi Ackie, Mark Ruffalo and Toni Collette

Advertisement

Director:  Bong Joon Ho

Rated: R (Violent content, strong language throughout, sexual content and drug material.)

Movie Review:

Robert Pattinson stars as the titular character under the direction of Bong Joon Ho, who masterfully directed “Parasite” (2019), which received the Best Picture Oscar in 2020. “Mickey 17” is an adaptation of Edward Ashton’s science-fiction novel “Mickey7.” It is an eccentric treat for moviegoers wanting something different.

An impressive Pattinson plays Mickey Barnes, a man down on his luck on Earth. He takes a gig as an “expendable,” a disposable crew member on a critical space mission to colonize the ice planet Niflheim. As an expendable, Barnes does the dangerous tasks because his body can be re-cloned if his body dies or is severely injured. A new body is replicated with his memories intact. All is well until a mishap with the seventeenth incarnation of Mickey Barnes occurs.

Advertisement

“Mickey 17” is a different type of movie than Bong Joon Ho’s “Parasite,” which also garnered the moviemaker a Best Director Oscar. However, the photoplays are similar in that they have the same quirkiness that makes them enticing entertainment.

Think of “Mickey 17” as “Groundhog Day” (Director Harold Ramis, 1993) meets “Starship Troopers” (Director Paul Verhoeven, 1997). It has unconventional characters, comedy, action and plenty of adventure through a science-fiction lens. The problem is the comedy is rarely funny. Comedic moments can exist in sci-fi movies, but comedy and science fiction rarely mix well. A movie should primarily be one or the other to resolve this duality.

Otherwise, “Mickey 17” is an enjoyable movie. It takes one to a new place through imaginative means. Additionally, Pattinson is pleasing to watch. He inspires one to care about Mickey and his grueling profession.

Grade: B- (17th time is the charm.)

 

Advertisement

“Queen of the Ring” (Sports Drama: 2 hours, 20 minutes)

Starring: Emily Bett Rickards, Josh Lucas, Tyler Posey and Gavin Casalegno

Director: Ash Avildsen

Rated: R (Violence, including domestic violence, strong language and suggestive material)

Movie Review:

Advertisement

“Queen of the Ring” is another good wrestling movie following “The Wrestler” (2008), “Fighting with My Family” (2019) and 2023’s “The Iron Claw,” the latter two being biographical sports movies like “Queen of the Ring.” Director Ash Avildsen’s resume just improved with “Queen of the Ring,” a well-acted and energetic.

Mildred Burke (Rickards) is one of the first women to wrestle professionally when the sport is only legal for men in the United States. The small-town single mother improves her muscle mass and techniques in the ring, becoming the first woman million-dollar athlete. Her path to the championship belt is not easy, especially dealing with her abusive husband Billy Wolfe (Lucas), who doubles as her manager. Burke grapples with the issues and remains persistent in achieving success.

Ash Avildsen (“American Satan, 2017) keeps the movie’s focus mostly in the ring. The athletic moments are good, but Mildred Burke’s actions outside the ring impress more. Here, Emily Bett Rickards shines in this role. Her physical skills are good, but she is better with the dramatic roles outside the ring. If only the writers and Avildsen spent more time there, “Queen of the Ring” drama could be more impactful.

Grade: B (She is regal in the ring.)

 

Advertisement

“Ex-Husbands” (Drama: 1 hour, 39 minutes)

Starring: Griffin Dunne, Miles Heizer and James Norton

Director: Noah Pritzker

Rated: NR (Strong language, sexual references and thematic elements)

Movie Review:

Advertisement

The title “Ex-Husbands” sums up the plot of this movie by director-writer Noah Pritzker (“Quitters,” 2015). It is about a group of men, from senior citizens to age 30, who are exes. The movie turns into a nice drama about the bond between fathers and sons, led by Griffin Dunne, who first gained major attention for his roles in “An American Werewolf in London” (1981) and “After Hours” (1985).

“Ex-Husbands’” opening scene takes place in a cinema with Manhattan dentist Dr. Peter Pearce (Dunne) counseling his father, Simon Pearce (Richard Benjamin), recommending the elderly man not divorce his wife of 60 years, who is Peter’s mother Eunice (Marcia Kurtz). Six years later, Peter’s wife of 35 years (Rosanna Arquette) leaves him. Peter enters a midlife crisis mode. To cope with depression, Peter books a trip to Tulum, Mexico, unaware that his sons Nick (Norton) and Mickey (Heizer) are going there for the Nicks’ bachelor party. The brothers do not want their father at the festivities for fear. He would turn the event into a pity party about his divorce from their mother. However, their days in the coastal city become an eye-opening experience for the three men that strengthens their familial bonds.

Rarely do movies show multiple male perspectives during breakups, especially as a family affair. “Ex-husbands” does. While not all men in this family are married, their separations leave them without the women they love. Only one of the men, Simon, is happy about leaving his wife, although his son Peter objects.

Interestingly, we only see Eunice, Peter’s mother and Simon’s wife, briefly during the opening scene. More appearances may help the audience understand the elderly couple’s relationship more. Simon’s reason for ending the relationship is dubious. Viewers can see that Simon appears to have aged better than Eunice. However, an octogenarian talking about returning to the dating game is comical, although this is really a drama. Peter and Simon’s conversation inspires humor, not because it is meant to be funny but because of the circumstances that life delivers to all. This trend carries throughout this photoplay.

Again, this is a solid drama and a subtle comedy. It is like real life. It has unexpected moments of both joy and sadness. Despite all of this, “Ex-Husbands” is appealingly uplifting, despite depressing moments throughout its runtime. The good performances of actors Griffin Dunne, Miles Heizer and James Norton make one care about their characters even after the collapse of love.

Advertisement

Grade: B (Even your ex should appreciate this.)

 

“Night of the Zoopocalypse” (Animation/Horror: 1 hour, 31 minutes)

Starring: Gabbi Kosmidis

Directors: Ricardo Curtis and Rodrigo Perez-Castro

Advertisement

Rated: PG (Action/peril and scary images throughout.)

Movie Review:

“Night of the Zoopocalypse” is an energetic and adventurous animated horror movie for younger audiences. Its inspiration is an adaptation of the short story “ZOOmbies” by horror master-filmmaker Clive Barker (“Hellraiser” and “Candyman” series)

Seven zoo animals led by Gracie (Kosmidis), a wolf, and Dan (Harbour), a mountain lion, must survive the night after a meteorite causes a virus that turns some animals into zombies. The zoo animals of Colepepper Zoo thought that being a zoo made them safe. Now, they realize they are trapped with no means of exiting their captive home.

“Night of the Zoopocalypse” is a captivating movie for families looking for a children’s movie that offers some thrills. A very straightforward, conventional plot turns into an entertaining ride that leaves this zoo feeling like an amusement park.

Advertisement

Grade: B- (Visit this zoo, but remember it is not a petting zoo.)

 

“In the Lost Land” (Action/Adventure: 1 hour, 41 minutes)

Starring: Milla Jovovich, Dave Bautista, Amara Okereke and Arly Jover

Director: Paul W.S. Anderson

Advertisement

Rated: R (Violence and language)

Movie Review:

“Into the Lost Land” is lost on good storytelling although based on short story by the famed George R. R. Martin. The main characters have no chemistry in Constantin Werner and Paul W. S. Anderson’s screenplay. This feels cheap like one of those adventure movies on the Syfy Channel. You watch them because they appear intriguing, but when done you have to question why you wasted hours watching.

A queen (Amara Okereke) seeks a mystic power to achieve love. To retrieve it from the dangerous Lost Lands, she approaches the powerful witch Gray Alys (Jovovich). The witch grants wishes for a price and grants the queen’s request. Gray Alys then hires the brave hunter Boyce (Bautista), who is knowledgeable of the Lost Lands, as a guide. Gray Alys is ruled a heretic by the church is hunted by merciless missionaries of The Church led by The Enforcer (Jover), so her task with Boyce to achieve her task will be treacherous. They must survive murderous religious zealots and demons.

Paul W.S. Anderson once again directs his muse, wife Milla Jovovich. This movie feels like their “Resident Evil” movies, where Jovovich runs and fights in cyclical scenes. Jovovich is good in these action roles, but most of their collaborations are run of the mill B-movies.

Advertisement

Although based on the written work of George R. R. Martin, “Lost Lands” is a shabby story that concentrates more on action than a good story. The plot seems at the narrative’s midpoint. Elements of something fascinating exist within this narrative, but it remains lost far offscreen.

Grade: D+ (Wayward lands.)

 

“Rule Breakers” (Drama: 2 hours, 01 minutes)

Starring: Nikohl Boosheri Amber Afzali, and Mohamed Bentaleb

Advertisement

Director: Bill Guttentag a

Rated: PG (Thematic material and violent content)

Movie Review:

Angel Studios presents another movie based on a true story. This one is inspiring, despite some formulaic biodrama aspects.

Roya Mahboob (Boosheri) is an Afghanistan woman who runs programs to help girls in her country computer programming and robotics. Despite obstacles from a male-dominated society, she puts together a team of teenage girls who become the Afghan Dreamers. They are a robotics team that competes in robotics tournaments around the world. The team’s quest to gain recognition is constantly in flux as Afghan men and some foreign governments bombard them with barriers. Still, these young women remain vigilant and achieve their goals.

Advertisement

The script by director Bill Guttentag and cowriters Jason Brown and Elaha Mahboob gives one a chance to know the characters in this inspiring movie, yet the tougher cultural aspects touched on are rushed. Still, this is a good movie debut on the weekend of International Women’s Day.

Grade: B- (Movie Rule: Take a break and see this encouraging drama.)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘Supergirl’ – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘Supergirl’ – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – At what is meant to be a poignant moment in the DC Comics adaptation “Supergirl” (Warner Bros.), the title character, played by Milly Alcock, is told by her mother (Emily Beecham) that she doesn’t have to be nice but she must be good. The recipient of this advice takes it to heart in a way that lends the whole film an unpleasant tone.

We’re not talking Deadpool depths of obscene snark here. Yet scrappy Supergirl, aka Kara Zor-El, in contrast to her affable cousin — and fellow Kryptonian — Superman (David Corenswet), does not come across as especially likeable.

Nor is she a figure to be imitated since, before she embarks on the quest to which most of the running time is devoted, early scenes show her waking up with a succession of staggering hangovers. She gets blotto, we later learn, in an effort to blot out her troubled past. The only positive ingredient in her current life is the bond she shares with her beloved dog, Krypto.

So when evil alien Krem of the Yellow Hills (Matthias Schoenaerts) wounds Krypto with a poisoned dart, leaving him with only hours to live, Supergirl is desperate to help the pup survive. Learning that Krem carries the antidote with him wherever he goes, she sets off on an interplanetary hunt for the villain, racing against time.

Supergirl has already crossed paths with another of Krem’s victims, Ruthye (Eve Ridley). Having watched as Krem slaughtered her entire family, Ruthye is out for revenge and wants to join forces with Supergirl.

Advertisement

Since Ruthye, though courageous, is undersized and completely untrained for combat, Supergirl initially tries to ditch her. But Ruthye is not to be so easily rebuffed.

The unlikely duo eventually acquire an informal ally in the person of cigar-chomping, motorcycle-riding freelance warrior Lobo (Jason Momoa). Lobo has reasons of his own for hating the band of brigands Krem leads.

As scripted by Ana Nogueira, director Craig Gillespie’s scifi adventure includes more than one exchange in which Supergirl warns Ruthye about the morally corrupting effects of exacting vengeance. Yet this thoroughly respectable ethical message is completely undermined as the action reaches its climax.

“Supergirl” may not be a dose of Kryptonite. But it’s no energy-infusing sunbath either.

The film contains much harsh but bloodless violence, a scene of urination, a passing reference to nonscriptural religious ideas, a couple of mild oaths, several uses each of crude and crass language and an obscene gesture. The OSV News classification is A-III – adults. The Motion Picture Association rating is PG-13 — parents strongly cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.

Advertisement

Read More Movie & Television Reviews

Copyright © 2026 OSV News

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Balaramana Dinagalu’ review: A restrained look at the gangster mind

Published

on

‘Balaramana Dinagalu’ review: A restrained look at the gangster mind

In K M Chaitanya’s Aa Dinagalu (2007), actor Atul Kulkarni, playing gangster Agni Sreedhar, says man is the biggest weapon in the underworld. “The rest are just properties,” he adds. The yesteryear Kannada crime drama, based on the real incidents from a big chapter of the Bengaluru underworld, stood out for its understated storytelling.

In Balaramana Dinagalu, which has the skeleton of a sequel to Aa Dinagalu, weapons are seen in the first scene. As the film progresses, we encounter an arsenal of knives, razors, machetes, and guns — each an extension of the gangsters’ identities and an indispensable tool in their quest to remain feared and lethal. Chaitanya attempts to make the movie a mix of reality and entertaining tropes.

Balaramana Dinagalu (Kannada)

Director: K M Chaitanya

Cast: Vinod Prabhakar, Priya Anand, Atul Kulkarni, Ashish Vidyarthi, Ramesh Indira

Runtime: 151 minutes

Advertisement

Storyline: Balarama, an ordinary young man from a remote village in Karnataka, becomes a dreaded gangster who rules Bengaluru

The director has roped in the same cast, who played the dreaded gangster trio of Kotwal Ramachandra (essayed by Sharath Lohitashwa), Jayaraj (Ashish Vidyarthi), and Agni Sreedhar (Atul) in Aa Dinagalu. That’s what makes one instantly curious about Balaramana Dinagalu. The only difference in the latest movie from the previous one is the fictionalised names of the real dons. Jayaraj becomes Jayaram, Sreedhar is Shashidhar, and Muthappa Rai is called Monnappa Rai (played by Ramesh Indira).

Even if these characters are the big draw in the movie, the plot revolves around the journey of Balarama, a character with a small yet significant presence in Aa Dinagalu. Vinod Prabhakar’s portrayal of the titular role is the film’s biggest takeaway. He makes us feel for the character, and is quite impressive in the final portions of the movie, where Balarama struggles to break free from the underworld’s trap.

Balaramana Dinagalu is impressive when it reflects the psychology of a gangster. Jayaram is shown helping the needy while Balarama urges young boys to focus on education. It’s as if these men who commit heinous acts, have a heart as well. Shashidhar is often called “intellectual gangster”, as the film reflects how the underworld fears well-read men in the field. Politicians and policemen, the supposedly the protectors of people being part of the crime nexus, strengthen the movie’s world-building.

The film falters in its inability to rise above the plot’s predictability. Balarama’s journey is no different from the often-seen life of an innocent man from a small town who becomes a gangster owing to uncontrollable circumstances. I wish the film had delved a bit more into Balaram’s personality. Why does he not resist becoming a gangster? What dreams did he have when he moved to Bengaluru from a small town?

Advertisement

“My hands speak louder than my words,” says Balarama. This signals that he is someone who settles conflicts with fists rather than conversations. Despite this detail, Balaram’s entry into the underworld feels too sudden. The predictability strips the sheen away from the well-shot action sequences, as the result of every fight is known beforehand.

Chaitanya is careful not to glorify the act of violence. He wants to portray the negative effects of violence on the children in a family, as the movie ends with a hard-hitting frame. It’s impressive that the actor-director duo has delivered a non-hero-worshipping gangster saga.

That said, the movie could have benefited from a couple of gripping episodes. While it’s important not to romanticise the life of a gangster, there is no harm in delivering moments of peak tension, the biggest plus of the genre. 

The assassination of Jayaram, the impact of Kotwal’s elimination on the underworld, or the Sakleshpura incident involving Monnappa Rai, had the potential to offer edge-of-the-seat, high-stakes portions, but they are rushed. The love story is simple, but it lacks emotional intensity between the lead couple. Santhosh Narayanan’s dance numbers are forgettable (despite it being his forte) while his montage melodies are beautiful.

Balaramana Dinagalu adopts a restrained, almost clinical approach to the gangster genre. While that keeps it from glorifying violence, it also leaves the narrative feeling a touch too neat and emotionally muted.

Advertisement

Balaramana Dinagalu is currently running in theatres

Published – June 28, 2026 07:58 pm IST

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

A New Dawn Anime Film Review

Published

on

A New Dawn Anime Film Review

Perhaps there’s a certain irony in a story about a fireworks factory mostly keeping away from explosive drama. Yoshitoshi Shinomiya‘s lowkey feature directorial debut A New Dawn is at the very least visually captivating, comprised of lush and rather hypnotic production design. The story is small scale focusing on a trio of friends who try to save a fireworks factory in their hometown, but the imagery feels expansive and lush. A New Dawn begins with a beautiful and vaguely familiar display of this beauty: the flowing, painterly imagery of its opening sequence recalls Shinomiya’s work on the flashback sequence in Makoto Shinkai‘s your name., immediately showing that the film’s visuals might transcend its small town drama.

A background artist himself on films by Makoto Shinkai as well as the similarly resplendent Pompo: The Cinéphile, it makes sense that this history would be felt in the background works of A New Dawn. They’re dense with detail, rich with almost luminous color and illustrative texture. Shinomiya, who also wrote and storyboarded the film, veers away from the photorealism associated with someone like Shinkai through some impressionist touches – like the splotches of green paint which represent treelines – which sometimes turns into outright abstraction like when a character begins to run through the space. Sometimes there are swaying, morphing textures in the background as splotches of paint subtly shift around. On a more intimate level, the cluttered and characterful interior spaces tell a story too. This is a long-winded way of saying A New Dawn looks really, really good.

It’s not just in the tableaux of its countryside habitats and ramshackle living spaces carved out of abandoned warehouses, but there’s a sense of invention permeating through A New Dawn‘s various experiments with visual languages of animation. The most prominent is an incredibly charming stop motion animated sequence using a cardboard diorama and real human hands invading the shot in a creative reflection of a drunken character’s perspective. Even though it broadly still looks “anime” through its character design, there are also smaller details which work to set A New Dawn apart from its contemporaries, touches like its occasional lineless artwork or the way rain is defined through smudged black brushstrokes.

It’s in the screenwriting where A New Dawn begins to feel more run of the mill. Its story about the constant chasing of the majesty of a fabled firework “Shuhari” feels both familiar in its premise but also a little bit alienating in its structure. The importance of the firework itself never feels clear – the moment its mystery is unravelled hardly feels like a revelation as a result, something amplified by how the writing often obfuscates what anyone is talking about. The whole story feels a little distancing, and despite the allure of the background art and design of the spaces the characters inhabit, the people themselves feel constantly at arms length.

It almost pulls things back with its climax – the detonation of the “Shuhari” goes a long way in justifying the circular conversations about its nature and origins – a painted streak of light launches into the sky before turning into something otherworldly, suddenly tripling down on the film’s captivating exaggerations.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending