Connect with us

Entertainment

L.A. wildfire coverage shows why local TV news matters in a crisis

Published

on

L.A. wildfire coverage shows why local TV news matters in a crisis

As the devastating wildfires began to sweep across Los Angeles on Jan. 7, frightened residents were not turning to Netflix.

Local TV news broadcasts were the video go-to for residents seeking immediate information on the crisis that engulfed the region. Anchors and correspondents have spent hours in the field and on the air providing life-saving details about evacuations and damage, along with a generous helping of emotional comfort.

“The performance of local stations has been phenomenal,” said Jonathan Wald, a veteran TV news producer who has worked for NBC News and CNN. “In the face of incredible tragedy, they are knowledgeable and keep their heads as they cover what’s happening in their neighborhoods.”

Traditional TV viewing has been in steady decline during the streaming era, now accounting for just half of all video consumption, according to recent Nielsen data. But even with diminished ratings and profits, TV stations have added hours of news coverage to their lineups and streaming platforms. The trend prepared Los Angeles outlets for a catastrophe that required a sustained flow of up-to-date information.

The availability of local TV news on digital platforms provided horrific yet compelling images of destruction to a global audience well beyond Los Angeles. Wald called the wildfires “the white Bronco chase of natural disasters,” referring to the police pursuit of O.J. Simpson that transfixed a nation of viewers in 1994.

Advertisement

Stations saw viewership double and triple for their news programming during the first week of wildfire coverage, according to Nielsen data, with more than 1 million watching in prime time on Jan. 7. Hundreds of millions of minutes have been streamed across the station’s digital platforms.

Some journalism purists look down their noses at local TV news, which was once defined by stunts, gimmicks, and breezy “happy talk” in the studio.

But in an era when mainstream media have been under attack for perceived bias, viewers still mostly trust local TV news. The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism issued a report last year showing that local TV news was trusted by 62% of Americans surveyed, well ahead of any network, cable or digital source.

Long-tenured local TV reporters and anchors develop roots in the area. Their personal stakes were laid bare as the inferno that swept across the region threatened their own families and friends.

“One of the things that makes local news powerful is that the people reporting are experiencing the story themselves,” said Andrew Heyward, a former CBS News president who currently consults local TV stations. “And viewers feel like they know them.”

Advertisement

Elex Michaelson, a veteran anchor at Fox’s KTTV, said years of covering stories and emceeing community events helps journalists build connections with the audience. It gives them credibility when they provide information and comfort in a crisis.

That’s not always easy while covering a disaster in your backyard. Michaelson struggled to stay composed when he learned that Agoura Hills, his childhood neighborhood, was being evacuated.

“That’s when I started to tear up,” Michaelson said in an interview. “When their evacuation orders went out and my sister’s house was a part of it, I thought of her grabbing their new baby and leaving, not knowing if the house was going to be there when they got back.”

For days, Jasmine Viel of CBS station KCAL and her husband Marc Cota-Robles, an Orange County native who reports for Disney-owned KABC, were out on 12- to 14-hour shifts while her mother watched their children in Pasadena. They stared at each other in disbelief in the brief moments they crossed paths at home during the first week of the disaster.

“We couldn’t even talk about it, because we didn’t even know what was going to happen next,” Viel told The Times.

Advertisement

Every local TV reporter covering the wildfires has a story to tell about stepping out of their journalistic role to help residents. Viel found a distraught Pasadena woman who saw flames approaching a coop that housed pet chickens and ducks behind her home on Altadena Drive. Viel’s camera operator John Schreiber, whose wife grew up on a farm, handled the birds as they were removed and rescued.

KTTV’s Gigi Graciette, a Hollywood native who has covered numerous wildfires, makes a point of resetting her live shot every 25 minutes and telling viewers the number of the block she‘s on so they can determine whether they will be affected.

“There is nothing more frustrating than to hear on the news that something is happening in your neighborhood, but you don’t know what street it’s on,” she said.

National cable and broadcast networks have their own reporting teams on the ground covering the wildfires. But many of the images those outlets use come from local stations. CNN took live shots from KABC, KCAL and Spectrum News Los Angeles. NewsNation, the cable network owned by Nexstar Media Group, utilized the parent company’s KTLA for hours of live coverage.

Broadcast networks ABC, CBS and NBC have also relied on their locally owned stations for network coverage of the fire on TV and their streaming news channels.

Advertisement

Providing sustained live coverage online is essential in the age of video on-demand. TV station streams of news programming are widely available for free on such platforms as Amazon’s Prime Video, Tubi, Pluto TV and Roku.

“People don’t want to wait,” said Frank Cicha, executive vice president for Fox Television Stations. “Local television was famous for, ‘We’ll be back later with what you want to see,’ and they were able to get away with it.” Not anymore.

Fox Television Stations’ streaming platform, LiveNOW, provides video from its 29 outlets across the country. KTTV’s fire coverage ran continuously on LiveNow for days, driving a 65% increase in traffic, according to Emily Stone, vice president of digital content for Fox.

“It gave people a chance to watch local, live up-to-the-minute coverage of a story happening in a huge U.S. city that everybody cares about,” Stone said.

Reaching viewers outside of Los Angeles has helped in fundraising efforts for those displaced by the wildfire and prompted other acts of generosity. After KCAL’s Jeff Nguyen interviewed a man whose home was destroyed, the owner of an empty residence in Laguna Beach offered it as temporary shelter.

Advertisement

Graciette told the story of an 81-year-old Navy veteran in Altadena who lost his electric wheelchair in the blaze. Multiple offers came from viewers to replace it. A woman watching in England told Graciette she was inspired to make a donation to a veterans group.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Bonjour Tristesse: Stilted Summertime Sadness (Early Review)

Published

on

Bonjour Tristesse: Stilted Summertime Sadness (Early Review)

As far as niche sub-genres are concerned, the “Summer When Everything Changed” film has certainly proved itself a reliable little lane for up-and-coming filmmakers to traverse, affording them the space to discover their own styles just as their subjects begin to discover themselves. Sometimes, the significant change depicted comes from a moment of subtly depicted life-altering trauma; sometimes it’s a moment of sexual awakening; oftentimes it’s both, but the power always comes from that synergy between art and artist—that feeling that the film exists as an inescapable piece of the filmmaker’s own past brought to the screen.

Perhaps this is where a film like Bonjour Tristesse deviates somewhat from expectations, for while the bones of this story could very well have spoken personally to debuting director (and writer) Durga Chew-Bose enough to send her towards this material in the first place, the material itself has been around since long before her own adolescent crossroads. An adaptation of a 1954 novel by Françoise Sagan—itself already adapted four years thereafter by none other than Otto Preminger—Chew-Bose’s film already has a steep hill to climb beyond the scope of her own memories (as is so often, though not always, the case with these films), and so the challenge becomes less one of recapturing subjectivity and more a challenge of creating it from scratch.

The subject of this well-worn tale of ennui is Cécile (McInerny), a teenage girl spending her summer in the south of France with her widowed father Raymond (Bang) and his French girlfriend Elsa (Nailila Harzoune). Cécile’s days are filled—as is the case with most films of this ilk—with meandering trips to the beach and cozy games of solitaire on the couch with a glass of wine, all in between courting her first love affair with a local boy, Cyril (Aliocha Schneider). It’s not until an old friend of the family, Anne (Sevigny), arrives to share in this vacation that the malaise of summertime gives way to more concentrated bouts of interpersonal horn-locking.

The first thing one may notice about Bonjour Tristesse, as is typically the case with films of this quietly crushing sabbatical nature—think Call Me By Your NameAftersunFalcon Lake—is a concentrated emphasis on atmosphere. These films understand that to communicate what is so inarticulable to the child’s mind means communicating it, oftentimes, without words at all, instead letting the blistering heat of the sun or the invasive hum of cicadas fill the dead air that so often accompanies stolen glances. Chew-Bose is definitely privy to this notion, as her film makes a concerted effort to shoot the seaside of the day and the lofty trees of the night with equal emphasis to the words shared in their space.

It’s a concept that Drew-Bose understands, but not one that she executes all that effectively. This is mainly because Bonjour Tristesse, for all its emphasis on what can be communicated without words, seems entirely determined to undermine that notion at every turn with an endless stream of stilted, overworked dialogue exchanges. Nearly every line in the film feels written as though it was thought-up with the expressed intention of becoming an out-of-context pull-quote for teenagers unwilling to sit through a film this sparse to begin with—“Be wrong sometimes… it’s less lonely,” or “I love this time of day; there is so much possibility before lunch”—which may be an effective tool to make some characters appear more vapid or constructed than others, but doesn’t really serve a film of this tone when everybody speaks that way.

Advertisement

This may very well be a byproduct of the film’s literary origins—not only is Bonjour Tristesse based on a book, but Chew-Bose’s own prior artistic experience comes from writing a book compiled of essays—in which sensory experiences and complicated, contradictory thoughts must, by necessity, be expressed in words. If anything, though, this further emphasizes the challenge that comes with adaptation, and the laudable efforts of those who manage to adapt to the work to the silver screen and make that sensory experience more… well, sensory. Even the presence of Sevigny (in an ironic twist, an actress who made her bones on independent films becomes the most recognizable name in this one) does little to elevate the film, controlled as she may be in her grasp of the film’s stilted aura. Chew-Bose may very well have found something viscerally relatable in Sagan’s source material to warrant yet another adaptation, but rarely has the feeling of a warm summer day felt so foreign and frigid.

In the end, Bonjour Tristesse never quite lives up to its interest in harnessing the malaise of a quiet and confused summer, mostly due to its over-reliance on fatigued dialogue and thin characterization.

Score: 47/100

*still courtesy of Elevation Pictures*


If you liked this, please read our other reviews here and don’t forget to follow us on Twitter or Instagram or like us on Facebook.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

'Dead Outlaw,' a musical about a famous corpse discovered in Long Beach, makes its way to Broadway

Published

on

'Dead Outlaw,' a musical about a famous corpse discovered in Long Beach, makes its way to Broadway

“Dead Outlaw,” the offbeat musical from the team behind the Tony-winning musical “The Band’s Visit,” isn’t mincing words with the title. The show, which had its official opening Sunday at Broadway’s Longacre Theatre, tells the story of the unsuccessful career of a real-life bandit, who achieved more fame as a corpse than as a man.

Born in 1880, Elmer McCurdy, a crook whose ambition exceeded his criminal skill, died in a shoot-out with the police after another botched train robbery in 1911. But his story didn’t end there. His preserved body had an eventful afterlife all its own.

“Dead Outlaw,” a critics’ darling when it premiered last year at Audible’s Minetta Lane Theatre, may be the only musical to make the disposition of a body an occasion for singing and dancing.

David Yazbek, who conceived the idea of turning this stranger-than-fiction tale into a musical, wrote the score with Erik Della Penna. Itamar Moses, no stranger to unlikely dramatic subjects, compressed the epic saga into a compact yet labyrinthine book. Director David Cromer, whose sensibility gravitates between stark and dark, endows the staging with macabre elegance.

Yet Yazbek, Moses and Cromer aren’t repeating themselves. If anything, they’ve set themselves a steeper challenge. “Dead Outlaw” is more unyielding as a musical subject than “The Band’s Visit,” which is to say it’s less emotionally accessible.

Advertisement

Andrew Durand stars in “Dead Outlaw.”

(Matthew Murphy)

It’s not easy to make a musical about a crook with a volatile temper, an unslakable thirst for booze and a record of fumbled heists. It’s even harder to make one out of a dead body that went on exhibition at traveling carnivals and freak shows before ending up on display in a Long Beach fun house, where the mummified remains were accidentally discovered by a prop man while working on an episode of “The Six Million Dollar Man” in 1976.

Stephen Sondheim might have enjoyed the challenge of creating a musical from such an outlandish premise. “Dead Outlaw” evokes at moments the droll perversity of “Sweeney Todd,” the cold-hearted glee of “Assassins” and the Brechtian skewering of “Road Show” — Sondheim musicals that fly in the face of conventional musical theater wisdom.

Advertisement

As tight as a well thought-out jam-session,”Dead Outlaw” also recalls “Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson,” the Michael Friedman-Alex Timbers musical that created a satiric historical rock show around a most problematic president. And the show’s unabashed quirkiness had my theater companion drawing comparisons with “Hedwig and the Angry Inch.”

Andrew Durand, who plays Elmer, has just the right bad-boy frontman vibe. The hard-driving presence of bandleader and narrator Jeb Brown suffuses the production with Americana authenticity, vibrantly maintained by music director Rebekah Bruce and music supervisor Dean Sharenow.

Elmer moves through the world like an open razor, as the title character of Georg Büchner’s “Woyzeck” is aptly described in that play. A précis of Elmer’s early life in Maine is run through by members of the eight-person cast in the bouncy, no-nonsense manner of a graphic novel.

The character’s criminal path is tracked with similar briskness — a fateful series of colorful encounters and escapades as Elmer, a turbulent young man on the move, looks for his big opportunity in Kansas and Oklahoma. Destined for trouble, he finds it unfailingly wherever he goes.

Elmer routinely overestimates himself. Having acquired some training with nitroglycerin in the Army, he wrongly convinces himself that he has the know-how to effectively blow up a safe. He’s like a broke gambler who believes his next risky bet will bring him that long-awaited jackpot. One advantage of dying young is that he never has to confront his abject ineptitude.

Advertisement

Arnulfo Maldonado’s scenic design turns the production into a fun-house exhibit. The band is prominently arrayed on the box-like set, pounding out country-rock numbers that know a thing or two about hard living. The music can sneak up on you, especially when a character gives voice to feelings that they can’t quite get a handle on.

Thom Sesma in "Dead Outlaw."

Thom Sesma in “Dead Outlaw.”

(Matthew Murphy)

Durand can’t communicate emotions that Elmer doesn’t possess, but he’s able to sharply convey the disquiet rumbling through the character’s short life. There’s a gruff lyricism to the performance that’s entrancing even when Elmer is standing up in a coffin. But I wish there were more intriguing depth to the character.

Elmer is a historical curiosity, to be sure. And he reveals something about the American moneymaking ethos, which holds not even a dead body sacred. But as a man he’s flat and a bit of a bore. And the creators are perhaps too enthralled by the oddity of his tale. The show is an eccentric wallow through the morgue of history. It’s exhilarating stylistically, less so as a critique of the dark side of the American dream.

Advertisement

Julia Knitel has a voice that breaks up the monochromatic maleness of the score. As Maggie, Elmer’s love interest for a brief moment, she returns later in the show to reflect on the stranger with the “broken disposition” who left her life with the same defiant mystery that he entered it. I wish Knitel had more opportunity to interweave Maggie’s ruminations. The unassuming beauty of her singing adds much needed tonal variety.

The musical takes an amusing leap into Vegas parody when coroner Thomas Noguchi (an electric Thom Sesma) is allowed to strut his medical examiner stuff. Ani Taj’s choreography, like every element of the production, makes the most of its minimalist means.

Wanderingly weird, “Dead Outlaw” retains its off-Broadway cred at the Longacre. It’s a small show that creeps up on you, like a bizarre dream that’s hard to shake.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Dea Kulumbegashvili – 'April' movie review

Published

on

Dea Kulumbegashvili – 'April' movie review

From the very first frame of Dea Kulumbegashvili’s April, an inexplicable sense of dread and unease takes hold. The opening moment feels like a sharp intake of breath that stays trapped inside you, forcing the audience to experience the same helplessness, scrutiny, and fear as the film’s protagonist, Nina, an OB-GYN who provides abortions for women in her rural Georgian town. After being questioned for delivering a stillborn baby, Nina’s practice comes under intense scrutiny, as she tries to persist in her duties despite the risk to her career.

April is a vital and unflinching look at the ways women suffer under the patriarchy, with Kulumbegashvili forcing our gaze toward the insidious modes of oppression that make women prisoners within their own bodies. The film opens by contrasting two images: a naked, grotesque-looking monster—something notably female but stripped of obvious human qualities—and the sight of rain hitting tarmac. The tonal clash between these two sights, the unnatural and the natural, captures the jarring visceral power of April and its central message, drawing a stark line between the forces of nature that lie within our control and those that strip women of their right to choose.

Within the current arguments around abortion (which is insidiously still seen as a controversial and debatable human right), some people paint the idea of pregnancy and motherhood as an entirely natural and inevitable experience. However, April shows an alternative and ominously present reality in which she contrasts the serenity of the natural rural landscape with stifling images of Nina performing abortions on the women around her, with one of them being a completely static shot that lasts nearly fifteen minutes as she performs the procedure on a young teenage girl who a family member has sexually abused. Pregnancy is not an experience chosen willingly by many of the women in the town, with Nina encountering underage girls who are forced into marriage and motherhood, quietly being stripped of their autonomy and turned into slaves of the patriarchy. 

Advertisement

Each frame is haunted by an omnipresent feeling of violence, with still shots of thunderstorms and drooping flowers evoking an inescapable feeling of dread. Natural sights are turned into monstrosities at the hands of Kulumbegashvili, who infuses a sense of foreboding into every image as they become reflections of Nina’s powerlessness in helping these women and the looming threat that their freedom will be diminished by the end of the film.

Nina’s anxiety is characterised by the sight of the monster that opens the film, with the sound of its wheezing breaths being present throughout the entirety of the film, reflecting the depths of her despair and feeling of being trapped by this malignant force, doing everything in her duty to counteract its command while also being stuck in its web.

There is a moment in the film where you learn that the story takes place in 2023, emerging like a punch to the gut as you realise that this story is a reality for an increasing number of women. Motherhood is depicted as a primal and natural force, but Kulumbegashvili shows just how severely cruel and oppressive this force can be, continuing one long and oppressive life cycle that is violent and ultimately, life-destroying for too many women.

April highlights the consequences of the war on reproductive rights through her unflinching attack of the senses, with the female body becoming a powerless vessel that our eyes desperately try to escape, lingering inside our skin as we are immersed in the true horror of this fate

Advertisement

Related Topics

Subscribe To The Far Out Newsletter

Continue Reading

Trending