Entertainment
How 'Bluey' special 'The Sign' was created: 'It’s one of the most beautiful episodes we've made'
This article contains spoilers about “The Sign” episode of “Bluey.”
Everyone’s favorite Australian dog family is going supersized.
“The Sign,” a highly anticipated 28-minute special episode of “Bluey,” is now streaming on Disney+. While a typical episode of “Bluey” is around seven minutes long, “The Sign” is the equivalent of a two-hour movie in the “Bluey” universe.
“We always said wouldn’t it be incredible if we could do three seasons and a movie,” executive producer Daley Pearson says. “We would love to do beyond that but wouldn’t that be an Everest to climb. I think this is a version of delivering on that promise. It was such a great creative challenge that we had to do it.”
“Bluey” which is produced in Brisbane, Australia, by Ludo Studio (which Pearson co-founded) typically has four different animation teams who work on individual episodes. For “The Sign,” the four teams collaborated. “This is the first episode made by the whole studio,” Pearson says. “That was a big production challenge in itself.”
1
2
1. An artist at Ludo Studio. (Anthony Pham) 2. A rendering from “Bluey.” (Ludo Studio)
Since the show’s inception, Pearson says, it has taken risks. He cites episodes like Season 2’s “Sleepytime,” which takes Bluey’s younger sister Bingo on a dreamy nighttime journey, and “Flat Pack,” which is about assembling furniture but also about evolution. “There were always these traditional ‘Bluey’ episodes but then there were always these avant-garde episodes,” he says.
“The Sign” is the pinnacle of that.
“It’s an episode about these very important things that these characters are going through,” Pearson says. “It’s probably the biggest possible changes these characters have ever gone through. There’s a bit of experimental feel to it. Will it work? Will the audience stick with it? And I think it’s one of the most beautiful episodes we’ve made.”
The episode, which was written by series creator Joe Brumm, finds Bluey, Bingo and their parents Chilli (Melanie Zanetti) and Bandit (Dave McCormack) preparing for the wedding of Bandit’s brother Rad (Patrick Brammall) and Bluey’s godmother Frisky (Claudia O’Doherty), two characters who first met in Season 2’s “Double Babysitter.” The title of the episode refers to the “For Sale” sign in front of the Heeler home. Because of Bandit’s new job, they are selling their house and moving, something Bluey, in particular, is not happy about. And while Chilli is trying to be supportive, it’s clear she doesn’t want to move either.
“These parents are having to deal with these big life decisions, but they are also putting on a brave face for their kids,” Zanetti says. “And the moment we see the vulnerability between mum and dad, it’s those moments as a kid when you start to realize that your parents are just people or dogs and fallible and very human/canine.”
Chilli and Bluey in a scene from “The Sign.”
(Ludo Studio)
Throughout the series’ three seasons, adult topics like why there is friction between Chilli and her sister Brandy (Rose Byrne, whose cameo in “The Sign” will make viewers so happy) have been seamlessly woven into the plots. But “The Sign,” which also finds Chilli trying to save the wedding when Frisky runs off, gives the adult characters even more time in the spotlight. “When you are used to the format of seven minutes, there’s only so much you can play with and attack at once,” Zanettti says. “With this, there’s so much more scope for going deeper and nuanced.”
McCormack says the episode lifts the veil on what the parents are dealing with while still trying to be there for their kids. “It’s all going on for people and you don’t realize and people keep it hidden,” he says. “They’re going through hard times as well and they are trying to keep a lid on it, but it’s all gone out of control.”
“The Sign” also tackles some bigger themes like the unpredictability of life. “We are always trying to make the right choice. Like everyone is trying to do the right thing. The difference between what we should see as the right thing and what in our gut and heart we feel is the right thing. I think there’s a beautiful looking into that and grappling with that in this episode,” Zanetti says.
McCormack adds, “Everyone is trying to make the best decision at that time and you’re going to make mistakes. I think that’s for me the underlying feeling of this episode is you’ve just got to try and do your best. You’re going to get it wrong sometimes. But you’ve just got to do what you think is right at the time with the info you’ve got, which is a pretty big concept for a kid’s show.”
“The Sign” tackles some bigger themes like the unpredictability of life.
(Ludo Studio)
Does Pearson feel like “The Sign” has a larger message?
“I feel like ‘Bluey’ episodes are turning into a bit of a Rorschach test,” Pearson says. “It’s hard to say what we meant. It’s hard to put our own meaning into it. It’s always lovely to get these letters and emails and meet people on the street that episodes or characters meant something to them that we may not ever thought of or dreamed of. It’s always lovely to hear the audience completing the circle rather than we complete it for them.”
Since the show’s premiere on Disney Junior in 2019, the series has defied any possible predictions of success and become a global phenomenon. It is consistently one of the top streaming shows. A stage version of the series titled “Bluey’s Big Play,” debuted in America in 2022 and continues to tour. Zanetti and McCormack have been guests on “The Tonight Show” and they even made an appearance at the Twin Cities Comic Con last year. But that’s not necessarily how they measure the show’s success.
“My favorite part is that the show has brought so much, not just joy into people’s life, but also healing,” Zanetti says. “What I didn’t expect was people in their early twenties saying, ‘I have had a really difficult childhood and this show is reparenting me.’ Or, ‘I didn’t think I’d be able to have kids because I didn’t know how to treat them correctly from my upbringing but now I feel like I could be a mother.’ Things like that are just profound and that was not expected.”
McCormack and Zanettti, who record the show separately, got the episode in two parts, and while recording the first half of the episode, had no idea how it was going to end. “We didn’t have to act like we didn’t know what was really going on because we didn’t know what was going on,” McCormack says.
“That has never happened before,” Zanetti says. “That was exciting and a little bit scary.”
Sketches of the characters from “Bluey.”
(Ludo Studio)
Therefore, like viewers, Zanetti and McCormack didn’t know if the Heelers would go through with the move until the very last moment. “It was like in ‘Toy Story 3’ when they’re about to go into the incinerator and they hold hands and make peace with what’s happening,” Zanetti says. “I had one of those moments. I had to surrender and then at the end I was crying.”
True to his laid-back canine alter ego, McCormack had quite the different reaction. “I was feeling a little excited about a new house,” he says. “Part of me was almost like, ‘Ooooh, I wonder what this is going to be.’”
Pearson, who says hints have been dropped throughout the third season that a possible move was the direction the show was heading, says they never seriously considered relocating the family. “I think it would have been a tough decision to move them. The whole point of these characters, and this family is it’s aspirational, they’re the best of everyone. To move them, it just felt like it would have been a bit of a betrayal of the audience. I think keeping them there, it was always going to be that.”
Now that the show has climbed its own personal Everest, what’s next?
“It was sort of no secret that it was a bit of a test to see does an audience like ‘Bluey’ as a longer format? Would a feature film work for ‘Bluey?’ We don’t know yet,” Pearson says. “We’ll wait until Sunday. We hope people like it and if they do we would love to think about where it could go next.”
Movie Reviews
Miyamoto says he was surprised Mario Galaxy Movie reviews were even harsher than the first | VGC
Nintendo’s Shigeru Miyamoto says he’s surprised at the negative critical reception to the Super Mario Galaxy Movie.
As reported by Famitsu, Miyamoto conducted a group interview with Japanese media to mark the local release of The Super Mario Galaxy Movie.
During the interview, Miyamoto was asked for his views on the critical reception to the film in the West, where critics’ reviews have been mostly negative.
Miyamoto replied that while he understood some of the negative points aimed at The Super Mario Bros Movie, he thought the reception would be better for the sequel.
“It’s true: the situation is indeed very similar,” he said. “Actually, regarding the previous film, I felt that the critics’ opinions did hold some validity. “However, I thought things would be different this time around—only to find that the criticism is even harsher than it was before.
“It really is quite baffling: here we are—having crossed over from a different field—working hard with the specific aim of helping to revitalize the film industry, yet the very people who ought to be championing that cause seem to be the ones taking a passive stance.”
As was the case with the first film, opinion is divided between critics and the public on The Super Mario Galaxy Movie. On review aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes, the film currently has a critics’ score of 43% , while its audience score is 89%.
While this is down from the first film’s scores (which were 59% critics and 95% public) it does still appear to imply that the film’s target audience is generally enjoying it despite critical negativity.
The negative reception is unlikely to bother Universal and Illumination too much, considering the film currently has a global box office of $752 million before even releasing in Japan, meaning a $1 billion global gross is becoming increasingly likely.
Elsewhere in the interview, Miyamoto said he hoped the film would perform well in Japan, especially because it has a unique script rather than a simple localization as in other regions.
“The Japanese version is a bit unique,” he said. “Normally, we create an English version and then localize it for each country, but for the first film, we developed the English and Japanese scripts simultaneously. For this film, we didn’t simply localize the completed English version – instead, we rewrote it entirely in Japanese to create a special Japanese version.
“So, if this doesn’t become a hit in Japan, I feel a sense of pressure – as the person in charge of the Japanese version – to not let [Illumination CEO and film co-producer] Chris [Meledandri] down.
“However, judging by the reactions of the audience members who’ve seen it, I feel that Mario fans are really embracing it. I also believe we’ve created a film that people can enjoy even if they haven’t seen the previous one, so I’m hopeful about that as well.”
Entertainment
Review: Monica Lewinsky, a saint? This devastatingly smart romance goes there
Book Review
Dear Monica Lewinsky
By Julia Langbein
Doubleday: 320 pages, $30
If you buy books linked on our site, The Times may earn a commission from Bookshop.org, whose fees support independent bookstores.
First loves can be beautiful or traumatic, sometimes both. They are almost always intense, with emotions on speed dial and hormones running amok. Nothing like the durable consolations of late-life romance, but headier, more exciting and, in the worst cases, far more damaging.
Even decades later, Jean Dornan, the protagonist of Julia Langbein’s smart, poignant and involving novel “Dear Monica Lewinsky,” can’t recollect her own first love in tranquility. Its after-effects have derailed her life, and an unexpected email invitation to attend a retirement party in France honoring her former lover sends her into a tailspin.
An agitated Jean finds herself praying to none other than Monica Lewinsky, the patron saint of bad romantic choices, or as Langbein puts it, “of those who suffer venal public shaming and patriarchal cruelty.” In Langbein’s comic, but also deadly serious, imagination, this is no mere metaphor. The martyred Monica has literally been transfigured into a saint. And why not? Surely, she has suffered enough to qualify.
Jean and Monica have in common a disastrous liaison with an attractive, powerful, married older man. Monica was humiliated, reviled, then merely defined by her missteps. Meanwhile, her arguably more culpable sexual partner survived impeachment, retained both his political popularity and his marriage and enjoyed a lucrative post-presidency.
Jean’s brief fling during the summer of 1998 coincided with the public airing of Monica’s doomed romance. Jean’s passion took a more private toll, but she still lives with what Monica calls “this deepening suspicion that your existence is a remnant of an event long since concluded.”
Though framed by a fantastical conceit, “Dear Monica Lewinsky” is at its core a realist novel, influenced by the feminism of #MeToo and precise in its delineation of character and place. Langbein’s Monica — having finally transcended her past and ascended to spiritual omniscience — becomes Jean’s interlocutor. Together, they relive the fateful weeks that Jean spent studying the Romanesque churches of medieval France and charming David Harwell, the Rutgers University medieval art professor co-leading the summer program.
Every now and again, Monica, as much savvy therapist as all-knowing seer, interrupts Jean’s first-person account to offer guidance. Threaded through the narrative, as contrast and commentary, is a martyrology of female saints. These colloquially rendered portraits, reflecting a punitive, patriarchal morality, describe girls and women who would rather endure torture or even death than sully their sexual purity — stories so extreme that they seem satirical.
The portraits play off the novel’s milieu: a series of churches, as well as the medieval French castle that is home to an eccentric and mostly absent prince. The utility of religious doctrine and practice is another of the book’s themes. One graduate student, Patrick, is a devoted Roman Catholic, unquestioning in his faith. Others are merely devout enthusiasts of medieval architecture. Judith, a doctoral candidate at Harvard, has an addiction of her own: an eating disorder that threatens to disable her.
A rising junior at Rutgers, Jean is one of just two undergraduates in the program. Her initial dull, daunting task involves measuring and otherwise assessing the churches’ “apertures” — windows and doors. Later, she is assigned to collaborate on a guidebook and write a term paper.
A language major unversed in art, architecture or medieval history, Jean feels overwhelmed at times. But she does have useful talents: fluent French and the ability to conjure delicious Sunday dinners for her bedazzled colleagues. (The author of the 2023 novel “American Mermaid,” Langbein has both a doctorate in art history and a James Beard Foundation Journalism Award for food writing, and her expertise in both fields is evident.)
As the summer wanes, Jean’s fixation on David grows. Langbein excels at depicting the obsessive nature of illicit, unfulfilled desire — how it swamps judgment and just about everything else. A quarter-century Jean’s senior, David is trying to finish a stalled book project, laboring in the shadow of his more prolific and successful wife, Ann. An expert on the erotically charged religious life of nuns and the art it produced, she shows up briefly in the story and then conveniently disappears.
David is smooth, seductive and, to 19-year-old Jean, far more appealing than the fumbling schoolboys she has known. But he turns out to be no more grown-up or emotionally mature. After the flirtation and its consummation, David beats a hasty (and unsurprising) retreat. Then he does something worse: He allows his guilt to shred his integrity.
In the aftermath of that summer, a wounded Jean stumbles through her last two years of college, “berserk, unfocused, humiliating.” She abandons her academic and career ambitions, takes a job as a court interpreter, and marries Michael, an affable nurse who has little idea of her emotional burdens.
Then that invitation, inspiring “a racy heat,” arrives, and Jean must decide whether to confront her past or keep running from it. Is there really much of a choice? Fortunately, she has the saintly Monica as her guide. More clear-eyed now, Jean must reject her martyrdom and reclaim her own truth and agency. If she does, David, at least in the realm of the imagination, may finally get his comeuppance.
Klein, a three-time finalist for the National Book Critics Circle’s Nona Balakian Citation for Excellence in Reviewing, is a cultural reporter and critic in Philadelphia.
Movie Reviews
‘I Swear’ Review – Heart Sans Sap, Cursing Aplenty
The sixth outing in the director’s chair for filmmaker Kirk Jones, I Swear dramatizes the real-life story of touretter John Davidson (played by Robert Aramayo). Tourette’s Syndrome, for those unfamiliar with the condition, is a nervous system disorder that causes various tics, the most prolific being erratic and explicit language. However, as I Swear expertly showcases, the syndrome is far more than ill-timed outbursts of curse words. Davidson’s story is one of societal frustration, finding your people (both with and without the condition), and using your voice to help others rise. The subject and subject matter are handled with absolute care and understanding under Kirk’s measured vision and Robert Aramayo’s BAFTA-winning performance.
The film kicks off with the greatest exclamation to democracy ever uttered (*%#! the Queen!), as a nervous John Davidson prepares himself before entering an awards ceremony hosted by Britain’s royal family. Right away, the film tells us what it is: a triumph over adversity that blends humor and human drama with education. It’s an important setup, as the film flashes back to Davidson’s 1980s youth, where we see his time as a star soccer recruit flatline as his condition takes hold. Davidson’s life spirals from there. Some aspects, like school bullying and accidental run-ins with authority figures, are expected but important to empathizing with young Davidson’s (young version, played with heart by Scott Ellis Watson) new everyday life. The more tragic, a complete meltdown of his family system, is unsettling if quick. His father (Steven Cree) is never given enough screen time to explore his alcohol coping tendencies. However, his mother Heather’s descent into easy fixes and blaming is crushing and convincing. Harry Potter series actress Shirley Henderson (Moaning Myrtle) gives a layered performance as Heather. Someone who loves her son, but also feels cursed by him as the entire family exits the picture. It’s bitter, she’s tired, and fills each conversation with ‘only medication and your mother can save you’ energy.
From there, the viewer and Davidson find refuge in a host of characters. Maxine Peake plays Dottie, the mother of a childhood friend and a retired mental health nurse. Screen vet Peter Mullan plays maintenance man Tommy Trotter. Together, they help Davidson build a life and an understanding of himself that carries the film forward into its second half. After that, the film is primarily a 3-actor show as director Kirk fills the screen with these tour-de-force performances. Peake and Mullan are great vessels to get the film’s main message across: patience, love, and a shared responsibility between the diagnosed and those who understand their struggle can help change the path for people quickly left behind by a normative world. Together, they are the soul of the movie, with the filmmakers clearly hoping the audience will follow their lead after they exit the theater (in my case, the beautiful Oriental Theater for the Milwaukee Film Festival). Both performances are perfectly warm and reflective and shouldn’t be left out in discussions of I Swear.
I say this because the movie is anchored by The Rings of Power actor Robert Aramayo, who leaves Elrond’s elf ears behind to bring an acute naturalism to his performance of main character John Davidson. Aramayo’s physicality and timing of the fitful Tourettes Syndrome never feel out of place or overplayed. In fact, the movie as a whole does an amazing job of never veering into sentimentality. While many moviegoers left with tissues dabbing their eyes, the filmmaking never felt like it was forcing that reaction out of audiences. It straddles the line between feel-good and reality with every story beat and lands squarely on the side of letting the real inform our feelings. Anyone with an ounce of empathy will grasp the film’s message and hopefully take it with them into life.
I Swear continues at the Milwaukee Film Festival on Tuesday, April 21st, and releases nationwide April 24th, 2026, courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics.
-
Nebraska6 minutes agoCarriker Chronicles: Sean Callahan on Matt Rhule’s Critical Year 4 with Nebraska Football
-
Nevada12 minutes agoChanges could be made to Nevada’s ‘Black Book’ this week
-
New Hampshire18 minutes agoHiker who set out in warm spring weather found dead after snowstorm in New Hampshire mountains
-
New Jersey24 minutes ago2028 New Jersey ATH has ‘great experience’ on visit to Syracuse
-
New Mexico30 minutes agoGovernor establishes Energy Affordability and Grid Reliability Council – 13-member council designed to protect ratepayers, modernize the grid – Office of the Governor – Michelle Lujan Grisham
-
North Carolina35 minutes ago
NC State’s 2026 Atlantic hurricane forecast calls for an average season with 12 to 15 named storms
-
North Dakota41 minutes agoValue of North Dakota oil rises as Iran war upends markets – KVRR Local News
-
Ohio48 minutes agoNWSL announces expansion to Columbus, Ohio
