Connect with us

Entertainment

Awards favorite Brendan Fraser says he won’t be attending the Golden Globes | CNN

Published

on

Awards favorite Brendan Fraser says he won’t be attending the Golden Globes | CNN



CNN
 — 

Brendan Fraser, who has garnered appreciable awards buzz for his starring flip in subsequent month’s “The Whale,” says he does not plan on attending the subsequent Golden Globes ceremony, citing his “historical past” with the group in a brand new interview.

“I’ve extra historical past with the Hollywood Overseas Press Affiliation than I’ve respect for the Hollywood Overseas Press Affiliation. No, I cannot take part,” the actor defined in an interview with GQ revealed on Wednesday.

Fraser is seemingly referring to the 2018 allegations the actor made towards the previous president of the HFPA, Philip Berk, whom he alleges groped him at an occasion in 2003.

Advertisement

Fraser added to GQ about his choice: “My mom didn’t elevate a hypocrite. You possibly can name me a whole lot of issues, however not that.”

In a distinct profile for GQ in 2018, Fraser described the encounter with Berk at a luncheon hosted by the group on the Beverly Hills Resort, the place Fraser alleged Berk grabbed his rear finish and, by his pants, touched him within the space between his genitals and his anus.

“I felt unwell. I felt like a little bit child,” Fraser stated on the time. “I felt like there was a ball in my throat. I believed I used to be going to cry.”

Berk denied any wrongdoing, admitting that he pinched Fraser’s buttock on the occasion in query, however in his personal interview with GQ, he stated he did so in jest.

After Fraser’s allegations, the HFPA launched an announcement that stated it was “investigating additional particulars surrounding the incident” and that it “stands firmly towards sexual harassment.

Advertisement

Behind the scenes, Fraser claimed to GQ this week, the group finally got here again to him and proposed issuing a joint assertion that stated, based on him, “Though it was concluded that Mr. Berk inappropriately touched Mr. Fraser, the proof helps that it was supposed to be taken as a joke and never as a sexual advance.”

Fraser says he refused to cosign the alleged joint assertion.

CNN has reached out to the HFPA and Berk for remark.

“I knew they’d shut ranks,” Fraser advised GQ. “I knew they’d kick the can down the highway. I knew they’d get forward of the story. I knew that I actually had no future with that system because it was.”

Reflecting on why his account could not have made waves, Fraser stated, “I feel it was as a result of it was too prickly or sharp-edged or icky for folks to need to go first and make investments emotionally within the scenario.”

Advertisement

After Fraser’s allegations, Berk remained an energetic member of the HFPA till final yr, when he was expelled for disseminating an article to fellow HFPA members that referred to Black Lives Matter as a “racist hate motion.”

The Golden Globes, lengthy thought-about the lead-up to the Oscars, additionally got here underneath fireplace final yr after it was revealed by the Los Angeles Instances that the affiliation contained no Black voting members.

Regardless of the group’s makes an attempt to handle the controversy and different ethics issues, NBC severed broadcast ties with the group, pending the group’s efforts to enact “significant reform.”

The 2022 Golden Globes weren’t aired on tv. NBC introduced in September that the present would return to air in 2023, citing the HFPA’s “dedication to ongoing change.”

When requested if he believed whether or not any of the HFPA’s introduced reforms translated to actual progress, Fraser was skeptical.

Advertisement

“In the mean time, no. Perhaps time will inform in the event that they’re going to…I don’t know what they’re going to do,” he advised GQ this week. “I don’t know.”

Following an overwhelmingly optimistic reception throughout movie competition season, Fraser is taken into account a shoe-in for a greatest actor Oscar nomination.

In “The Whale,” Fraser performs a reclusive, overweight trainer who’s making an attempt to reconnect along with his estranged teenage daughter Ellie (Sadie Sink from “Stranger Issues”).

The movie, directed by Darren Aronofsky, hits theaters on December 9.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Love Child (2024) Movie Review & Ending Explained: Can Love and Sacrifice Keep Ayla and Paolo’s Family Together?

Published

on

Love Child (2024) Movie Review & Ending Explained: Can Love and Sacrifice Keep Ayla and Paolo’s Family Together?

Rom Coms, the ones that match the endearing and intelligent with equal fluency, have a scintillating flavor. The book of tricks to make a romcom sing and soar may have admittedly gone jaded and dog-eared. The crises of couples, dilemmas, and anxieties they have to battle have undergone dramatic changes in a fast-evolving world. Expectations vary with the decades, even as gendered rules haven’t dented much.

The urge to steal a leaf or two from every standard template Hollywood romcom is immanent in any new derivation. It becomes a constant tussle, hence, for a new film in similar spaces to eke out freshness and smarts. Jonathan Jurilla’s directorial “Love Child” (2024) has little to add or say anything genuinely sparkling. It’s a weary distillation of parental exhaustion and re-alignment, too silly to pass off what it views as clever self-reflexive remarks.

There are basic cardinal rules a romcom must ensure is upheld. Conflicts should ideally resonate across a demographic; humor needs to exist in spades. A helping of self-awareness goes a long way in establishing a winking playfulness. The best rom-coms sail through these assumptions with lightness and spryness.

Love Child (2024) Plot Summary & Movie Synopsis:

Ayla and Paolo’s Journey of Love, Sacrifice, and Resilience

Ayla (Jane Oineza) and Paolo (RK Bagatsing) are young parents. Incidentally, the actors themselves are a couple in real life, who call the film a “free trial” to parenthood. Ayla and Paolo have been exultant about becoming parents but what awaits them is a whole lot of instability, fraught periods of testing faith in each other to weather the hardships of raising their child, Kali (John Tyrron Ramos) who is diagnosed with autism. It’s this diagnosis that opens the film and sends their lives into a tailspin. The two have fought with their families on several counts to realize their togetherness. Dreams have also been put on hold. Paolo is a filmmaker who desires to make it big but naturally meets resistance from his father, from whom he has cut loose.

Advertisement

They arrive in the Philippines to put up at the house that Ayla’s aunt has offered. They don’t have to worry about rent, an exponential anxiety hence taken care of. The first thing they get done is to enroll Kali at a school for children with support needs. They hope he can be addressed with due attention and be given proper time, nourished in a safe, loving, and understanding community.

How Far Will Ayla and Paolo Go to Secure a Future for Their Son?

Of course, things don’t go as smoothly. The money to raise the child is immense, formidable, and persistent. It’s no small task. To exacerbate matters, the couple has no savings to lean on. Ayla has just a small income from a virtual assistant job and Paolo has barely any gigs to draw a livelihood from in the Philippines.

At home back in Australia, opportunities were, at least, higher. Sources of supporting themselves stand a chance. The couple start a coffee cart as an added source of income. Even that isn’t enough. Customers are few. To run the cart is its own demanding affair that strains their purses more than they expected it to.

One night, Kali falls terribly sick. His parents rush him to the hospital, where medical expenses surge. Where will the couple find the money to foot the bill? They are at wit’s end. Pao assures Ayla not to worry. He’ll dredge out a way. However, when he is away scavenging for a source, Ayla already turns to her mother who lends her the needed money. He is angry with her because Ayla’s mother has been refusing to recognize Kali as her grandson. She tells him, if they waited longer, they’d be staring at an added day of hospital expenses.

Love Child (2024) Movie Ending Explained:

Do Ayla and Paolo find a way of raising their child?

Love Child (2024) Movie
A still from “Love Child” (2024)

Ayla and Paolo are compelled to employ specialized teachers and attendants for Kali. The cost of living becomes exceedingly high. How can they afford it? Ultimately, they edge toward the pained but necessary realization that they have to live apart at least for a while. If that’s the only way they can build a decent future for Kali, they can’t ignore it. What’s significant and decisive is both Ayla and Paolo are wholly committed to being there for Kali, no matter what it takes, as well as underscoring the need to go out and chase their individual aspirations.

Yes, she must pursue her dream of being a lawyer. The climax is a wistful one, with Paolo leaving for Australia where he would brush aside his bruised ego and accept his father’s job offer. He takes the marks of his wife and child, remnants of them he’d carry with him as he moves into an uncertain, yet hope-tinged future in Australia. They part ways with a promise of return. They know he’ll be back when the time is right and resources have accrued enough to carve for them a comfortable life together.

Advertisement

Love Child (2024) Movie Review:

“Love Child” lacks a fundamental, driving vitality and energy. It is only inconsistently curious and sporadic in its plunges into human indecision and the fear of failure. What is that projection we induce when we feel we are turning into reflections of our parents, a reality most horrific and to skirt clear? To encounter such a realization is depressing and upsetting.

The central pair of the film have to negotiate and move past reservations and a bundle of fears popping up. They are opposed to seeking the help of their parents, who have never sided with them in big decisions, but they also understand the need for a bigger family their child ought to have. Having just his parents wouldn’t suffice for Kali to rely on. For his sake, the parents have to look past their grudges and learn to forgive and let go of ill will.

Read More: 15 Best Netflix Original Horror Movies

It’s a question of need and learning to trust again those who have failed us, giving them another chance without being bogged down by ego and justified anger and disappointment. But the film never pads this vital realization of the parents well to land its ultimate point. “Love Child” dwells lightly on vast conflicts as these, papering them over with a convenient switch.

This is why the hardship and everyday strife don’t hit as deeply as they ought to. “Love Child” leaves you pining for a more textured understanding of the complex bonds of care between the couple and their child, who is bereft of any dimension other than his support needs. The film takes a blinkered, dull view and yet bungs in a slapdash discovery of the importance of a larger family.

Love Child (2024) Movie Trailer:

Love Child (2024) Movie Links: IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes, Wikipedia, Letterboxd
The Cast of Love Child (2024) Movie: RK Bagatsing, Jane Oineza, John Tyrron Ramos, Milton Dionzon, Mai-Mai Montelibano, Jaden Biel Fernandez, Chart Motus, Mary Jane Quilisadio, Mandy Alonso, Tey Sevilleno
Love Child (2024) Movie Runtime: 1h 40m, Genre: Drama
Where to watch Love Child

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

'I'm Still Here' star Fernanda Torres pulls off Golden Globes' biggest upset

Published

on

'I'm Still Here' star Fernanda Torres pulls off Golden Globes' biggest upset

In the only real upset of the night, Fernanda Torres won for lead actress in a motion picture drama for her role in “I’m Still Here.” The Brazilian actress beat out higher-profile stars Angelina Jolie, Nicole Kidman, Kate Winslet, Tilda Swinton and Pamela Anderson.

“My God, I didn’t prepare anything,” Torres said, scanning the audience from the stage. “This is such an amazing year for female performances. So many actresses here that I admire so much.”

Directed by Walter Salles, “I’m Still Here” is based on the true story of Eunice Paiva, whose husband is kidnapped and murdered during Brazil’s military dictatorship. She struggled for more than two decades to have his death officially recognized.

Torres’ mother, Fernanda Montenegro, had been nominated in the same category in 1999 for Salles’ “Central Station.”

Advertisement

“And of course I want to dedicate it to my mother. You have no idea. She was here 25 years ago,” Torres said. “And this is proof that art can endure through life, even in difficult moments like this.”

Torres noted the issues addressed by the film, saying, “the same thing that is happening now in the world, with so much fear. And this is a film that help us to think how to survive in such times like this.”

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review | Bleakness of Iceland adds to horror tale

Published

on

Movie Review | Bleakness of Iceland adds to horror tale

Despite the so-so storytelling, the work here by Palsson piques your interest as to what the native Icelander will make in the future.

Subscribe to continue reading this article.

Already subscribed? To login in, click here.

Originally Published:

Continue Reading

Trending