Connect with us

Entertainment

As Brenda in '90210,' Shannen Doherty played a complex adolescent not unlike herself

Published

on

As Brenda in '90210,' Shannen Doherty played a complex adolescent not unlike herself

In the pantheon of teen characters, there was no one better suited to bring an edge to the journey of girlhood, when we’re eager to fit in and grow up, than Shannen Doherty. The actor, who died Saturday at 53, was in her late teens when she took on the role of Brenda Walsh on “Beverly Hills, 90210,” and her experience echoed that of the character she’s best known for.

Brenda was a baby-faced good girl from Minnesota with an attractive twin brother who moved with her family to L.A.’s most famous and posh ZIP Code during her formative high school years. Doherty was a transplant from Memphis, Tenn., who as a child was discovered while performing in a church play.

Doherty, as Brenda, spent countless hours keeping us company on TV with an unforgettable and relatable portrayal of a teenage girl dealing with competing emotions — insecurity, angst and rebelliousness among them. Her character was ambitious, ready to find her place among L.A.’s elite. “I’m not going to miss Minneapolis. Nobody knows me out here, I can be anybody; I can be somebody,” says Brenda when we first meet her in the “90210” pilot.

Shannen Doherty is flanked by her “Beverly Hills, 90210” co-stars Brian Austin Green and Ian Ziering in 2019.

(Chris Pizzello / Invision/AP)

Advertisement

Brenda began as a sheepish character, but she was determined to fit in the moment she set foot in West Beverly High. She quickly struck up a friendship with cool girls Kelly (Jennie Garth) and Donna (Tori Spelling), while also immediately developing the desire to replicate their confidence and style. At one point, being one of the few brunets in a sea of blonds vying for the attention of a boy, she attempts to lighten her hair, frying it in the process. But in time, the new girl became the it girl when she began dating the coolest boy in school, Dylan McKay (Luke Perry). She also excelled at ignoring her parents’ advice and wishes and brought us along as she developed an interest in performing.

As the series went on, she illustrated what it was like to be a complex figure not just onscreen — Brenda was a rarity among teenage female characters at the time — but off screen as well. The vitriol toward Doherty and her character even resulted in a newsletter called “I Hate Brenda,” which printed gossip and ire about the actor, becoming a flash point for how people perceived strong, misunderstood women.

You could hate her one moment — like the time she slapped Andrea (Gabrielle Carteris) in drama class because she was jealous of Andrea’s closeness to the teacher, whom she had a crush on. And then root for her in the next — like when she came to the defense of her friends at a slumber party after Kelly’s cool but mean friend Amanda tried to belittle them. Or cry with her in another — like when she broke up with Dylan after a pregnancy scare, forever altering what we feel when we hear R.E.M’s “Losing My Religion.”

Reevaluating her character now, you can see how we had her all wrong — she was just a young person figuring out life, making immature missteps and whining while sometimes being annoying or mean in the process. Why hadn’t we given her more grace when she was betrayed by her best friend, who had hooked up with her on-again, off-again boyfriend while she was in Paris? “I thought you guys were my friends. I loved you. I trusted you both,” Brenda screams at them. “I hate you both! Never talk to me again.” Though Brenda was hardly perfect and her actions sometimes merited criticism, she often deserved more understanding. The same could be said of Doherty as she navigated fame.

Advertisement

Created by Darren Star and backed by the prolific TV producer Aaron Spelling, “Beverly Hills, 90210” was appointment-viewing, laying the foundation for the teen drama genre. The show was revolutionary in its exploration of high school life, with its discussions of sex and social strata. It turned its mostly little-known cast into superstars who incited mall mobs. As they rocketed to fame, Doherty generated plenty of tabloid fodder — headlines buzzed about behind-the-scenes drama with her castmates, her reputation for hard partying and domestic disputes with partners.

The show was a compelling and early hit for an ascendant Fox Network, and it was ‘90s TV at its finest. And as Brenda, Doherty was a big reason why. It’s why it‘s impossible to imagine “Beverly Hills, 90210” without Brenda Walsh. But along the way, Doherty and the “bad girl” persona that Brenda exemplified became intertwined, propelling her exit from the show after a rocky tenure. And again, reevaluating it all with some distance, you wonder what we may have had wrong about Doherty.

Actor Shannen Doherty attends 'The Gentleman's Ball' hosted by GQ Magazine.

Shannen Doherty in 2010. Love her or hate her, the actor and her character deserved more.

(Evan Agostini / Associated Press)

She was written out in 1994 after the show’s fourth season. The final stretch was a roller coaster that included her character returning home after a brief stint at the University of Minnesota and rumors of a casting couch situation after she landed the lead in a production of “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof” at the fictional California University, where the characters matriculated. When the show returned for its fifth season, Brenda’s absence was explained by saying she had moved to London to study acting. It was an unsatisfactory conclusion for Doherty and a character that had so indelibly defined what it was like to be a teenager for a generation — love her or hate her, she deserved more.

Advertisement

That Doherty and Perry both died in their early 50s, roughly the same age as many of their original “90210” fans, is a sobering reminder of the passage of time for a generation that feels too old to be young and too young to be old. But there’s a comfort in knowing that they live on forever as Brenda and Dylan, at least onscreen and in our minds, heading to Baja against her parents’ orders and dancing the night away. That was the power of their performances.

Not every actor is lucky enough to have even one character pierce the zeitgeist the way that Doherty did. She leaves a legacy that includes not only Brenda, but at least two other era-defining pop culture roles: Heather Duke in “Heathers” and Prue Halliwell in “Charmed.”

Bad girl or not, there’s no denying the goodness of that.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: The Mortuary Assistant – HorrorFuel.com: Reviews, Ratings and Where to Watch the Best Horror Movies & TV Shows

Published

on

Movie Review: The Mortuary Assistant – HorrorFuel.com: Reviews, Ratings and Where to Watch the Best Horror Movies & TV Shows

Forget the “video game movie” curse; The Mortuary Assistant is a bone-chilling triumph that stands entirely on its own two feet. Starring Willa Holland (Arrow) as Rebecca Owens, the film follows a newly certified mortician whose “overtime shift” quickly devolves into a grueling battle for her soul.

What Makes It Work

The film expertly balances the stomach-churning procedural work of embalming with a spiraling demonic nightmare. Alongside a mysterious mentor played by Paul Sparks (Boardwalk Empire), Rebecca is forced to confront both ancient evils and her own buried traumas. And boy, does she have a lot of them.

Thanks to a full-scale, practical River Fields Mortuary set, the film drips with realism, like you can almost smell the rot and bloat of the bodies through the screen.

The skin effects are hauntingly accurate. The way the flesh moves during surgical scenes is so visceral. I’ve seen a lot of flesh wounds in horror films and in real life, and the bodies, skin, and organs. The Mortuary Assistant (especially in the opening scene) looks so real that I skipped supper after watching it. And that’s saying something. Your girl likes to eat.

Co-written by the game’s creator, Brian Clarke, the movie dives deeper into the demonic mythology. Whether you’ve seen every ending or don’t know a scalpel from a trocar, the story is perfectly self-contained. If you’ve never played the game, or played it a hundred times, the film works equally well, which is hard to do when it comes to game adaptations.

Advertisement

Nailed It

This film does a lot of things right, but the isolation of the night shift is suffocating. Between the darkness of the hallways and the “residents” that refuse to stay still, the film delivers a relentlessly immersive experience. And thankfully, although this movie is filled with dark rooms and shadows, it’s easy to see every little thing. Don’t you hate it when a movie is so dark that you can’t see what’s happening? It’s one of my pet peeves.

The oh-so-awesome Jeremiah Kipp directs the film and has made something absolutely nightmare-inducing. Kipp recently joined us for an interview, took us inside the film, discussed its details and the game’s lore, and so much more. I urge you to check out our interview. He’s awesome!

The Verdict

This isn’t just a cash-grab; it’s a high-effort adaptation that respects the source material while elevating the horror genre. With incredible special effects and a powerhouse cast, it’s the kind of movie that will make you rethink working late ever again. Dropping on Friday the 13th, this is a must-watch for horror fans. It’s grisly, intelligent, and genuinely terrifying.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Former Live Nation executive says he was fired after raising ‘financial misconduct’ concerns

Published

on

Former Live Nation executive says he was fired after raising ‘financial misconduct’ concerns

A former executive at Live Nation, the world’s largest live entertainment company, is suing the company, alleging that he was wrongfully terminated after he raised concerns about alleged financial misconduct and improper accounting practices.

Nicholas Rumanes alleges he was “fraudulently induced” in 2022 to leave a lucrative position as head of strategic development at a real estate investment trust to create a new role as executive vice president of development and business practice at Beverly Hills-based Live Nation.

In his new position, Rumanes said, he raised “serious and legitimate alarm” over the the company’s business practices.

As a result, he says, he was “unlawfully terminated,” according to the lawsuit filed Thursday in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

“Rumanes was, simply put, promised one job and forced to accept another. And then he was cut loose for insisting on doing that lesser job with integrity and honesty,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

He is seeking $35 million in damages.

Representatives for Live Nation were not immediately available for comment.

The lawsuit comes a week after a federal jury in Manhattan found that Live Nation and its Ticketmaster subsidiary had operated a monopoly over major concert venues, controlling 86% of the concert market.

Rumanes’ lawsuit describes a “culture of deception” at Live Nation, saying its “basic business model was to misstate and exaggerate financial figures in efforts to solicit and secure business.”

Such practices “spanned a wide spectrum of projects in what appeared to be a company-wide pattern of financial misrepresentation and misleading disclosures,” the lawsuit states.

Advertisement

Rumanes says he received materials and documents that showed that the company inflated projected revenues across multiple venue development projects.

Additionally, Rumanes contends that the company violated a federal law that requires independent financial auditing and transparency and instead ran Live Nation “through a centralized, opaque structure” that enables it to “bypass oversight and internal checks and balances.”

In 2010, as a condition of the Live Nation-Ticketmaster merger, the newly formed company agreed to a consent decree with the government that prohibited the firm from threatening venues to use Ticketmaster. In 2019 the Justice Department found that the company had repeatedly breached the agreement, and it extended the decree.

Rumanes contends that he brought his concerns to the attention of the company’s management, but his warnings were “repeatedly ignored.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Madhuvidhu’ movie review: A light-hearted film that squanders a promising conflict

Published

on

‘Madhuvidhu’ movie review: A light-hearted film that squanders a promising conflict

At the centre of Madhuvidhu directed by Vishnu Aravind is a house where only men reside, three generations of them living in harmony. Unlike the Anjooran household in Godfather, this is not a house where entry is banned to women, but just that women don’t choose to come here. For Amrithraj alias Ammu (Sharafudheen), the protagonist, 28 marriage proposals have already fallen through although he was not lacking in interest.

When a not-so-cordial first meeting with Sneha (Kalyani Panicker) inevitably turns into mutual attraction, things appear about to change. But some unexpected hiccups are waiting for them, their different religions being one of them. Writers Jai Vishnu and Bipin Mohan do not seem to have any major ambitions with Madhuvidhu, but they seem rather content to aim for the middle space of a feel-good entertainer. Only that they end up hitting further lower.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending