To the Editor:

Re “She Confirmed a Prophet’s Picture, and Divided a Faculty Campus” (entrance web page, Jan. 8):

After a scholar complained that her artwork historical past professor’s exhibiting of a 14th-century picture of the Prophet Muhammad (one proven repeatedly in artwork historical past courses) was deeply offensive to Muslims, the professor was advised by college officers “that her companies subsequent semester have been now not wanted.”

By no means thoughts that Erika López Prater was educating applicable course materials, or that she had given ample warnings, each in school and on her syllabus, that if any scholar discovered pictures of holy figures insensitive to contact her with any considerations or to be at liberty to go away the category earlier than they have been proven. Or that her division chair initially backed her 100%.

She was dismissed as a result of adjuncts are disposable; they are often fired, for something. However the administration of Hamline College, the place Dr. López Prater taught, ought to know all too nicely how wanted adjuncts are. Like so many faculties and universities throughout our nation, they fear about shrinking enrollments and rising prices. Adjuncts are low cost; they educate at a fraction of the wage of full-time school.

The ratio of adjunct to full-time school in American faculties is shockingly excessive. They’re a option to penny pinch in a local weather the place administrative salaries drain budgets and the place dad and mom are fed up with astronomical tuition prices.

Cathy Bernard
New York
The author was a tenured affiliate professor of English on the New York Institute of Know-how.

To the Editor:

The combat over free speech rights and tutorial freedom at Hamline College underscores a number of issues going through increased schooling in America.

Years in the past I drafted Hamline’s civility code. It states partly, “The College embraces the examination of all concepts, a few of which is able to probably be unpopular and unsettling, as an integral and sturdy element of mental inquiry.” In drafting it, I used to be guided by a few ideas.

One, faculties are mini-democracies. They need to inculcate the kind of virtues in college students we’d count on them to show as residents in a democracy. As a substitute they’re now captured by the polarization, tradition wars and curiosity teams that plague America.

Two, we reside in a pluralistic society the place not all of us share comparable views on controversial points. Training shouldn’t be a pep rally; studying calls for confronting opposite viewpoints.

As I emphasize in my courses (one among which was featured on this newspaper), schooling is about recognizing context. Presentation of controversial concepts in an educational context is completely different from proselytizing hate.

Universities face fiscal and enrollment challenges. Some will decide and select whose speech to privilege with a view to placate donors and college students. That is the mistaken method. Colleges should respect neutrality and permit for all voices and opinions within the pursuit of fact of inquiry.

David Schultz
St. Paul, Minn.
The author is a professor of political science and authorized research at Hamline College.

To the Editor:

Did Erika López Prater’s resolution to show the portray of the Prophet Muhammad help scholar studying and success or compromise the educational setting? Educators ought to care for college students as a lot as artwork, and preserve an open thoughts about their method.

Throughout class, Dr. López Prater may have offered a hyperlink to the portray, providing choices to take part by viewing or listening (because it’s unfair to ask college students to go away the category). Earlier than providing such choices, educators can search steering from specialists with completely different views in addition to from college students themselves, by one-to-one conversations, written reflections, nameless surveys or dialogues with scholar organizations.

In the end what issues most is the scholars’ proper to a high quality schooling, which requires taking their wants under consideration and never forcing them to undertake an educator’s selection of whether or not or the right way to understand an object.

A really simply and honest schooling permits freedom of thought and expression for all. Aram Wedatalla, the scholar who objected to the exhibiting of the portray, courageously expressed her viewpoint, thus opening a broader and vital dialog about what inclusion actually means.

Catherine Elizabeth DeLazzero
New York
The author is an academic researcher who has taught in excessive faculties and universities.

To the Editor:

As a Muslim professor, I’m so indignant on the Hamline College administration about this firing! I admit that I’m not too spiritual anymore, however I nonetheless can not have a look at an outline of the Prophet Muhammad.

Nonetheless, the scholars got ample info on the syllabus and within the class previous to the picture being proven. They will hardly declare to be “blindsided.”

My take is that the Muslim college students are feeling let down by their college for different causes and so they took out their frustration on an adjunct school member. The administration took the simple manner out by firing her.

Seyda Ipek
Ottawa
The author is an assistant professor of physics at Carleton College.

To the Editor:

There are numerous disturbing points of this unhappy story, however what considerations me most is the obvious lack of ability to acknowledge that a couple of fact can exist concurrently, even when they aren’t in full alignment.

Within the rush to establish villains and heroes, we lose sight of the difficult chance {that a}) the professor was justified and nicely intentioned and b) the scholar was nonetheless genuinely offended by the professor’s resolution to indicate the picture.

Or {that a}) the professor gave opt-out choices prematurely however b) the scholar didn’t really feel empowered to train them totally.

If the college had begun with a presumption that all of these items have been concurrently true and had tried to discover a higher battle decision course of alongside the traces of restorative justice, each the scholar and the professor might need felt that they’d benefited from the battle.

As a substitute, we commute between dichotomous positions of proper and mistaken, villain and sufferer, oppressor and oppressed, and we find yourself not with progress towards unity however slightly with extra deeply entrenched variations.

Michael Rigsby
New Haven, Conn.

The G.O.P. vs. the I.R.S.

To the Editor:

Re “Home G.O.P. Votes to Minimize I.R.S. Funds; Senate Will Say No” (information article, Jan. 10):

The so-called Republican deficit hawks have made defunding the Inside Income Service their precedence this week. Fortunately this proposal has no probability to turn out to be regulation, however it reeks of hypocrisy to attempt to scale back I.R.S. staffing at a time of serious finances deficits and uncollected taxes.

As a substitute of backing the overdue overhaul of a vital revenue-producing arm of presidency, the deficit hawks invent a brand new conspiracy concept: I.R.S. brokers are out to get the typical taxpayer. I suppose that Republicans don’t have an issue with rich tax cheats, however that’s outdated information.

Final week’s Home Republican sideshow was the agony to make Kevin McCarthy the speaker. What can be subsequent week’s sideshow from Kevin McCarthy, Mitch McConnell and Co.?

Andrew J. Sparberg
Oceanside, N.Y.

L.G.B.T.Q. Life in Alabama

To the Editor:

Re “What It’s Prefer to Be Queer in Alabama,” by Lydia Polgreen (column, Jan. 8):

Thanks for this pointed and poignant opinion piece about L.G.B.T.Q. life in Alabama. Having lived in Birmingham, Ala., for a season, I used to be dropped at tears by the tenderness with which she portrayed this typically missed but vibrant queer group.

I’m a lifelong Southerner who, like many queers, has fled to Atlanta for its relative group and security. Even so, Birmingham and Alabama maintain a particular place in my coronary heart, and I’m gratified to see them represented with the nuance and respect they deserve.

Grayson Hester
Washington