Connect with us

Culture

What I learnt meeting Arne Slot: charismatic, innovative – but a big bet by Liverpool

Published

on

What I learnt meeting Arne Slot: charismatic, innovative – but a big bet by Liverpool

When, as expected, Arne Slot arrives at Liverpool’s training centre this summer, he will find at least one amenity perfectly to his taste. Slot is among the growing cast of top-level individuals in football hooked on padel, the high-paced racket sport that lands somewhere between tennis and squash.

At Feyenoord’s training base in the Dutch city of Rotterdam, chief executive Dennis Te Kloese promised Slot the club would install a padel court — on the condition they won the league title. Slot made them Eredivisie champions last season, and the padel court soon followed.

It means there is at least one shared trait between Slot and his Anfield predecessor Jurgen Klopp; the German has his own court at Liverpool’s training centre, competing against members of his backroom staff and calling padel “the best game I’ve ever played” (apart from football).

GO DEEPER

Football’s biggest stars are in love with padel. Why?

Advertisement

After Liverpool and Feyenoord agreed terms for Slot to replace Klopp this summer, many Liverpool fans wondered quite what to make of it and how well-suited the 45-year-old Dutchman is to replacing the club’s most popular and successful manager of the Premier League era. As ever, hasty opinions form, often conditioned by framing.

On the one hand, Slot is one of only two Feyenoord managers to win the title this century and he became the first coach to take the club beyond the group stage in a European competition since 2015, reaching the inaugural final of the Europa Conference League in 2022 and the Europa League quarter-finals last season in parallel to claiming the domestic championship.

He won that title despite retaining only four players from his starting line-up in that Conference League final. Sales from that side raised €70million (£59.9m at the current exchange rate) in fees, and just over 40 per cent of that was reinvested as Feyenoord pursued financial sustainability after too many years of financial mismanagement. Of their 12 permanent signings, not one was aged 24 or over.

This season, while again recording a positive net spend, Feyenoord are going to finish as runners-up, second to a freakish performance from PSV Eindhoven (who have won 27 and drawn three of their 31 league games so far), and will beat last season’s points tally of 82 if they win their last three matches. They won the Dutch equivalent of the FA Cup final just over a week ago.

This version of the story, therefore, is largely of consistent development and excellence.

Advertisement

Slot kisses the Eredivisie champions’ trophy (Olaf Kraak/ANP/AFP via Getty Images)

Others, however, may take an alternative framing. They may question if Liverpool are taking an almighty gamble on a man who has only five seasons of experience as a head coach, all of which have been in the Netherlands, outside of European football’s elite, and one of which was in his homeland’s second division.

Slot has coached only one campaign in the group stage of the Champions League, winning two of six games against Atletico Madrid, Lazio and Celtic, and losing the rest to fail to progress into the knockout phase.

In almost three full seasons as Feyenoord manager, Slot has never lost consecutive league games, which is incredibly impressive, but means there is no evidence-base for how he may handle the longer periods of difficulty which are more likely in the fiercely-competitive Premier League, even with a club among its elite.

At Feyenoord, no player recruited for Slot exceeded the €9million initial fee spent on Japanese striker Ayase Ueda from Belgian side Cercle Bruges last summer, and the highest player wage is believed to be around €40,000 a week. At Liverpool, he will inherit players such as Alisson and Virgil van Dijk, who were signed for eight-time multiples of Ueda, while Mohamed Salah earns £350,000 a week.

It all serves to underline the comparative dimensions of Liverpool and the potential culture-shock of what’s expected to be his new job; where man-management as well as coaching will be crucial.

Advertisement

Liverpool have over 37 times more followers on X, formerly Twitter, than Feyenoord’s 649,000; the media demands, global interest and revenues all dwarf those at his current club. The former Liverpool defender Jamie Carragher, writing in the UK’s Daily Telegraph newspaper after the Slot news broke, said: “For the last nine years, Liverpool have possessed one of the top two managers in the world. They are now gambling on the next big thing rather than appointing a proven, real deal.”

The truth is nobody can predict with certainty how any manager may fare at a new club but what we can do is consider some of the factors that may have persuaded Liverpool.

Last summer, The Athletic was provided with a window into Slot’s Feyenoord kingdom, receiving a full day of behind-the-scenes access. And on that day he was truly king of the castle, because Feyenoord had just clinched the title and it corresponded with the day he signed a new contract, having rejected the opportunity to join Tottenham Hotspur, who went on to appoint Ange Postecoglou. He has also remained faithful when two more Premier League clubs, Leeds United and Crystal Palace, came knocking earlier in the calendar year.

Our trip to Rotterdam included more than seven hours of interviews with Slot, CEO Te Kloese and their head of sporting strategy Matt Wade, as well as extensive time with their scouting team and performance staff. It was a 360-degree examination of a club who had dramatically reformed their structure and performance, and offered rare insight into a man upon whom Liverpool’s incoming sporting director Richard Hughes and Michael Edwards, the club’s former sporting director back after two years away in a new role as owner Fenway Sports Group’s CEO of football, are now preparing to stake their reputations.


Slot is popular with his players (Broer van den Boom/BSR Agency/Getty Images)

As for initial impressions, Slot appeared charismatic. But maybe you would be pretty affable too when you have just signed a new contract — a deal which removed a €5million release clause from his previous deal, which would have otherwise come into play this summer. That left Feyenoord able to negotiate last week anywhere between €11million and €15m out of Liverpool, depending on which club’s briefings of their final agreement that you choose to believe.

Advertisement

His grasp of English is easier on the ears and more lucid than his compatriot Erik ten Hag, who has sometimes struggled to convey the necessary charisma to both players and supporters in his near two seasons as Manchester United manager. And there were times, when Slot spoke, where the meaning behind his words could easily have come out of Klopp’s mouth.

When explaining why he had chosen to remain at Feyenoord, he talked of the need to “cherish what you have” within an environment, taking pleasure from the way you work and those you work alongside. He said success ought not to be measured by prizes alone. This, however, was tinged with a sense of realism that will be required at Liverpool. At one point he quipped: “If a coach only talks about the process, then nine out of 10 times, the results are bad.”

He talked of not wanting to be perceived as somebody who passes through, but as somebody who weaves a legacy into a club. He appeared genuinely touched when I told him how, during the previous evening, I had met a Feyenoord fan who credited Slot for not only winning more points than Ajax, Amsterdam’s 36-time Dutch champions, but allowing that supporter to believe for the first time that his team played prettier football than their arch-rivals, a club so closely connected with the ‘total football’ concept.

When he discussed what he seeks from his players, Slot said he initially “emphasised players who are not maybe the best in the world, but who brought energy to the team and also to the stadium”. It is an ingredient which may be needed at Anfield, where the home team feed off the adrenaline shots being pumped out from the stands. He wanted to know how his players conveyed themselves in the media, because that, he said, contributes to the culture.

Liverpool’s academy has proven fertile ground this season, as Klopp promoted talents including Conor Bradley, Jarell Quansah, Bobby Clark and Jayden Danns. Expect that to continue under his successor. Slot awarded 12,334 minutes to academy talent in the season Feyenoord won the league. During our visit, he reflected, “Youth players in your first team give energy. And if people feel they can grow inside the club, that drives the culture. I don’t believe that much in experience; I believe more in game intelligence, and young players can have much more than an older player.” He said this mindset, where anybody can progress, should extend beyond the dressing room, citing how Frank Boer, a former marketing department intern at the club, had gone on to become their team-manager, overseeing player care.

Advertisement

As with Klopp, he demonstrates empathy and care for younger generations. He looks with concern rather than bitterness towards the smartphone generation. “It’s much more difficult nowadays to play football,” Slot said. “Social media, being judged by everyone; more negative than it was in my day. And these guys now need to be so much fitter — really top athletes. So, yes, a big chance to earn a lot of money, but the pressure is higher than it was 20 years ago.”

The data says that Slot’s training sessions, with drills often devised by his assistant Sipke Hulshoff, motivate his players. The playing and training availability of squad members hit 90 per cent in each of his first two full seasons at the club. Leigh Egger, one of the club’s performance leads, said: “The training sessions are constantly changing. They hit the sweet spot of overload, tactics and physical demand. It makes our job in performance easier, because the players really want to train all the time. You see it also with the substitutes, who may have every right to be disappointed at not playing, but our training availability is so high because the sessions are stimulating and really fun, from a footballing regard.” Hulshoff, who is also in the backroom staff of the Dutch national team, is Slot’s first assistant on a matchday, and often seen in the dugout.

Slot wants his environment to be positive and favourable. He listens and collaborates, traits which cannot always be taken for granted at the highest level of sport. There is a system of fines for players, including for being late to a game or missing a team bus, but he is not a disciplinarian by nature. He does not see his role, or those of his staff, as akin to schoolteachers but rather to provide information, and give players every opportunity to make the healthiest choices.

One of Slot’s colleagues said they never once heard him raise his voice at the training ground.

Advertisement

Te Kloese, the CEO, said: “His player management is very unique — humane and thoughtful. He gives players a clear game plan, so players feel safe under him.” Players have often been heard speaking to one another after a game, saying how the action unfolded exactly how Slot had predicted, and how his instructions helped them overcome opponents.

Yet Slot’s success does not exist in a vacuum. It required uniformity of vision.

“Topsport”, as Feyenoord describe their culture, is applied across the club, which means consistency across the senior squad, the medical and performance teams and the academy. Under Liverpool’s sporting-director model, albeit with Edwards sitting at the top, the club want the person who’ll be their head coach, not manager, next season to co-exist within this framework, and at Feyenoord, Slot has demonstrated a willingness to do that.

The most successful clubs these days have departments across the board who communicate and support one another, rather than operating as separate siloed operations. In the case of recruitment, therefore, we know Liverpool leaned heavily on their data and research analysts during Edwards’ reign as sporting director, with the data operation identifying the potential of then Roma forward Salah to excel in the Premier League, even after a difficult period at Chelsea earlier in his career.

RONALD-KOEMAN-Sipke-Hulshoff

Hulshoff, right, is Slot’s top assistant and also works with Ronald Koeman and the Dutch national team (Olaf Kraak/ANP/AFP via Getty Images)

As Klopp grew more successful and powerful at Liverpool, his personal grip on recruitment became stronger, but while the club will welcome input from a head coach, they would like to simplify the role and allow that person to concentrate on the demanding bread and butter of developing players, preparing a team and selecting the line-up for the next match.

Advertisement

None of which means recruitment teams and a head coach should be in conflict. Rather, if it works how it has at Feyenoord, the scouts and analysts spend time with the coach, study his setup and firmly understand his style of play. Then they have a prescription for the type of players needed for the coach to excel, and so go off and work to identify options.

What Liverpool would wish to avoid is relying on the knowledge base of a coach, as rivals United appear to have done at times under Ten Hag, who has consistently looked to the Dutch market with which he is most familiar, as well as at players he has coached before, when it comes to signings.

At Feyenoord, Slot is invited into recruitment meetings and asked his opinion. Often, he has agreed with the evidence presented to him. There were times he suggested players he coached elsewhere, or made some pretty obvious suggestions from rival clubs such as PSV. There were other times he would swiftly decline options presented by scouts, based on a limited amount of video footage. None of which are automatically negative things — Lisandro Martinez, for example, has proven to be a fine signing for United having played for Ten Hag at Ajax. Yet when Feyenoord made signings, even if the one who came in would not always be his first preference, Slot never held a grudge against the players concerned and devoted all his time and energy to maximising their talent.

At Feyenoord, he has learnt to trust the scouting department, who strongly proposed the defender David Hancko after one scout had followed him from the academy of Slovakian club Zilina since his teenage years, with the player soon becoming integral for Slot. They then unearthed a $4million striker in Santiago Gimenez from Mexican side Cruz Azul and Slot’s confidence in the club’s deal-making, led by Te Kloese, was underlined when the CEO’s contacts in Mexico enabled him to beat clubs such as Porto and Benfica to Gimenez.


Slot has turned Gimenez into one of the most wanted players in Europe (ANP via Getty Images)

Signed in July 2022, Gimenez became Slot’s top goalscorer and the 23-year-old will this summer be one of the most in-demand young forwards in Europe. Other players, such as Mats Wieffer and Igor Paixao, emerged from the second divisions in the Netherlands and Brazil — Wieffer is now a full Dutch international and Paixao scored Feyenoord’s winner in that recent cup final.

Advertisement

Christos Akkas, a Feyenoord scout, said: “The coach was very specific about what he wants to play and we were able to capture from a data perspective, from a scouting perspective, but also from a mental, physical, technical, tactical perspective, exactly how he wants to play. And then the club set some rules. So we never sign an older or more expensive player than the one who is being replaced. Then we narrow down our search and, within that range, find the most suitable player.”

As Slot’s style of play requires intense levels of fitness and high cognitive ability — Akkas said players have commented how much thought is required on the pitch — scouts would leave no stone unturned. In some cases, this meant following potential recruits to their homes, to see what time the lights went off in the evening. This was particularly important because Rotterdam is a city of nightlife attractions, so there was little use in them signing a party-animal when intellectual and physical endurance is required every day.

As for the football, Slot does not disguise that he admires Pep Guardiola. There are traits that mirror much of what we have seen from Manchester City under the Spaniard, particularly the ferocious pressing to recover the ball and possession-based build-up.

In one of his first team meetings at Feyenoord after joining in summer 2021, he told his players that the Champions League final between Chelsea and Manchester City a few weeks earlier produced so few chances (a combined three shots on target) because of the defensive work applied by forwards on both teams.

On the ball, he likes his right-backs to drift into midfield, so expect Trent Alexander-Arnold to continue in that role, because Slot’s teams tend to build up with three men in defence and two in midfield, even if the starting formation is more of a back four. Each season, he has slightly modified how his team build out from the back, so as not to become predictable.

Advertisement
Trent Alexander-Arnold, Liverpool

Alexander-Arnold’s ‘midfield’ role is unlikely to change (Clive Brunskill/Getty Images)

In central midfield, he likes players who make “depth runs” — fast, explosive moves from deep which can penetrate opposing defences. Midfielder Orkun Kokcu, now with Benfica, needed to physically adapt to increase his explosiveness over the first few yards during his time at Feyenoord, even getting a gym installed at home, where he would receive regular text messages from Slot asking for updates on his progress.

Then there are the wingers, who he wants to isolate in one-on-one duels. This is why he brings his full-backs into central areas in the first place — to crowd the middle of the pitch, dragging opponents in to create one-on-one scenarios for those wide men. He said: “If you look at Roberto De Zerbi at Brighton, or Napoli (as they won the Serie A title last season, under Luciano Spalletti), or Man City or ourselves, we’ve got wingers who dominate these situations and that is what you need. That’s why I asked Dennis (Te Kloese, the CEO) at the beginning of the season for a lot of wingers, because you can’t expect every winger to perform in every single game and outplay their opponents. So that’s why they are the players substituted most often.”

At Liverpool, where Edwards and Hughes have strong reputations for identifying talent and deal-making, Slot should be prepared to delegate on signings.

It is not only within the field of recruitment where Slot has shown a preparedness to buy in. Feyenoord’s director of medical and performance Stijn Vandenbroucke has worked in his field for over two decades and he gushed as he described how the coach had complemented the club’s overall vision, all of which meant Feyenoord regularly excelled on “physical parameters, injury availability, winning games and physically outworking the opposition” — some pretty useful traits for a football club.

Vandenbroucke detailed the club’s approach to combining biological, psychological and social needs of players, to aid the individual and the team’s overall development.

Advertisement

Take, for instance, the case of striker Gimenez, where Slot was prepared to take a medium-term view after he arrived from Mexico.

When Feyenoord look at possible signings, they not only have their scouts observe the player, but the club’s performance and medical departments, too. Sometimes, the football staff will flag limiting factors that should be improved by the performance team (strength or speed, for example) and on other occasions, as was the case with Gimenez, the observations can come from the performance end. For Gimenez, they analysed his running style and noted he needed more “control around his trunk and pelvis” to avoid injuries and physically compete at the highest level. The observations are based on screenings of a player’s movement patterns, in-game and on the training field.

Vandenbroucke said: “We came to a conclusion that we needed a few months to get him (Gimenez) up and running. Arne agreed and he is the only manager I’ve ever worked with who would do that. It meant accepting we cannot play him from the start of the game because we needed the time to put more into him to get the output in the later stage of the season.”

Gimenez therefore started only five games in his 2022-23 debut season before club football paused in the November for the World Cup held in Qatar during the northern hemisphere’s winter. The plan went so smoothly that, after the tournament, he started 20 of Feyenoord’s final 21 Eredivisie and Europa League matches, scoring in 12 of them and finishing as their 20-goal top scorer.

Klopp has at times shown patience of his own, most notably taking time to bed Fabinho and Andy Robertson into his Liverpool team after they were signed.

Advertisement

Slot was sufficiently secure in his own skin that he allowed the club to bring in a sports psychologist, Dan Abrahams, to help the players overcome the mental block that had prevented Feyenoord winning away to fierce rivals Ajax since 2005. Abrahams supported the team in this challenge, culminating in a 3-2 away victory in March 2023, and their superiority over Ajax was reaffirmed this season with a 4-0 win in Amsterdam last September and a 6-0 romp in Rotterdam this month.

Feyenoord’s superiority in that away game was such that Ajax’s fans forced play to be halted by throwing flares onto the field.

Slot believes in the science. His performance experts suggested that the players should seek to adapt their lives to revolve around upcoming kick-off times. For example, if Feyenoord are due to play a game starting at 9pm on a Friday, then the staff and Slot will make clear to the players via a text message that they should not be asleep at that hour on the previous evening and should be active, to avoid their circadian rhythm making them flat on matchday. The Feyenoord backroom team were tight-knit, both together and with the players, and it will be interesting to see how and if this can be replicated at a bigger club.

He is seeking to bring one of his heads of performance, Ruben Peeters, with him to Liverpool, along with Hulshoff. He has tried and failed to convince Marino Pusic, formerly an assistant at Feyenoord, to be on his Anfield staff because he only joined Shakhtar Donetsk as their head coach last October and wishes to remain in that job.

Advertisement

In Hulshoff and Peeters, Slot will have allies who would seek to replicate the high-performance environment I witnessed in motion at Feyenoord. Yet he is going to need more help. He will need patience from above when results inevitably do not always go to plan and the scorching spotlight of life in the Premier League life burns bright, he will need expertise from the club’s recruitment department and, most crucially, he will need to secure buy-in from players of a profile and reputation that is of another scale to what he has experienced so far in his brief managerial career.

With Slot, the ideas and smarts appear to be there — a modern coach for a modern structure; it is now up to him to make the leap and up to Liverpool to produce an environment in which he can truly thrive.

(Top photo: NESimages/Herman Dingler/DeFodi Images via Getty Images)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Culture

Ashton Jeanty didn’t win the Heisman, but he’s still chasing history at Boise State

Published

on

Ashton Jeanty didn’t win the Heisman, but he’s still chasing history at Boise State

Ashton Jeanty was into basketball more than football as a kid. So before he grew up to be a 5-foot-9 battering ram in cleats, his favorite athlete was LeBron James. Jeanty, who bounced around the globe as the son of a Naval officer, spent a chunk of his childhood in Florida when James was on the Miami Heat.

“Seeing (LeBron) beat all the odds,” said Jeanty, “I feel like I’ve been doing that same thing in my career.”

It’s why the Boise State running back will forever be the answer to that same question — Who’s your favorite athlete? — for a generation of Broncos fans.

Jeanty didn’t win the Heisman Trophy, finishing second to Colorado’s Travis Hunter. But he did collect the most points by a Heisman runner-up and forced the narrowest margin of defeat since 2009. He also took home the Maxwell Award (player of the year), Doak Walker Award (best running back) and unanimous All-American honors. And Jeanty has another major milestone in his sights.

He enters the College Football Playoff at 2,497 rushing yards this season, just 131 yards shy of college football’s official single-season record, set by Oklahoma State’s Barry Sanders in 1988. Considering Jeanty has averaged 192.1 rushing yards per game this season, there’s at least a decent chance he rewrites that record in the quarterfinals of the College Football Playoff against Penn State on Dec. 31.

Advertisement

But Jeanty is more than just a Heisman runner-up and future first-round NFL running back who is on the verge of a record-breaking statistical accomplishment. At a Boise State program with a reputation for giant slaying and a rich history of running backs, he has managed to stand above the rest.

“Ashton Jeanty is phenomenal for college football, and he’s going to be phenomenal for the NFL,” said Boise State coach Spencer Danielson. “Not only from his play on the field but also the culture he brings with him.”

GO DEEPER

Can Penn State stop Ashton Jeanty? ‘He just doesn’t go down’

There is some nuance to Sanders’ record. He rushed for 2,628 yards in only 11 games on his way to the Heisman in 1988; Jeanty has already played 13 games. And Sanders’ unofficial record is 2,850 yards if you add in the 222 yards he racked up in the Holiday Bowl, before bowl game stats were officially counted.

Advertisement

There will be those who discount Jeanty’s record if he does set it, but Sanders won’t be among them, sending a tweet ahead of Boise’s victory in the Mountain West championship wishing Jeanty luck.

“My fans can gripe, but records are made to be broken & I am rooting for you,” Sanders wrote.

Asked about Sanders’ mark, Jeanty said it would be “like the cherry on top, to break a record that’s been around for decades,” especially after he came up just short in the Heisman race. But as Boise State enters the inaugural 12-team Playoff as a No. 3-seed from the Group of 5, the record — attained or not, contested or not — doesn’t change what Jeanty has achieved.

The stats are staggering, like if Paul Bunyan played high school football. Nearly 2,500 rushing yards, an FBS-leading 30 total touchdowns, 7.3 yards per carry and six games with 200-plus rushing yards. His season low was 127 yards against Portland State, and he got pulled at halftime. Jeanty outrushed 115 FBS teams this season all by himself. The next closest player to him in terms of rushing yards is North Carolina running back Omarion Hampton with 1,660. That’s less than the 1,889 yards Jeanty has gained after contact. He’s the first back to eclipse 2,000 yards rushing since 2019.

Advertisement

“I love watching Ashton play — the mix of physicality, speed and control,” said Alexander Mattison, a former Boise State running back now in the NFL with the Las Vegas Raiders. “But I’ve been able to get to know him, not just as a football player but a genuine person. It’s fun to see him get everything that he deserves. He loves the game, and if you love the game, it will love you back.”

There is an impressive pedigree of running backs at Boise State, with Jeanty set to become next in a long line of Broncos bell cows who have gone on to play in the NFL. Jeanty surpassed Cedric Minter as the program’s all-time leading rusher this season and broke a number of other records Minter has held since at least 1980. But the string of modern-day tailbacks stretches to Ian Johnson, who famously won the 2007 Fiesta Bowl on the Statue of Liberty handoff, followed by Jeremy Avery, Doug Martin, D.J Harper, Jay Ajayi (the former single-season record holder), Jeremy McNichols, Mattison and George Holani.

It’s quite a list, and that’s just the running backs. Former quarterback Kellen Moore is the winningest QB in FBS history (50) and the program’s only other Heisman finalist (he finished fourth in 2010). He remains a Boise State icon. Yet after this season, no one compares to what Jeanty has produced on the field or what he embodies off it.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Boise State and Ashton Jeanty: The Cinderella in a steel-toe boot

“He’s a unanimous captain, part of our leadership council,” said Danielson, who added that he meets one-on-one with Jeanty each week after those council meetings.

Advertisement

“Every single time we have those meetings, it is nothing about Ashton. He’s asking about the team, a player, asking how he can help lead better, have more of an impact,” said Danielson. “That is uncommon. He’s different in all facets.”

Jeanty does care about the awards and accolades. He hasn’t shied from that, whether rattling off the individual goals he had for himself this season or lamenting his Heisman finish by stating: “I really felt like I should’ve walked away with the award.” It’s part of why he returned to Boise State this season, believing he could achieve everything he wanted right where he was.

But Jeanty also cares about the legacy he will leave behind. It’s why he embraced being a team captain and leader and de facto spokesperson. It’s why he spurned more lucrative name, image and likeness (NIL) offers to transfer elsewhere last offseason. It’s why he established the Ashton Jeanty Endowed Scholarship for Football — in October, even before he broke all the records and became a Heisman finalist and carried the Broncos to a Mountain West title and first-round bye in the CFP. The scholarship has raised more than $180,000 toward its $200,000 goal, which will support future Boise State athletes.

“He’s like a movie star here,” said athletic director Jeramiah Dickey. “We had to finally get him security so we could cut off the autograph and photo lines. It was our responsibility to help him because he’s such a good kid, he didn’t want to say no to anyone.”

Jeanty is already the most decorated player in program history and has put Boise State in position to compete for a top-flight national championship for the first time. He has a chance to set a single-season rushing record that could stand for decades.

Advertisement

And none of it will outlast what he has meant to Boise State football and the community that surrounds it.

“Culture is about the people who are here — just bringing back what Boise State’s been, having a positive influence over everybody,” said Jeanty. “People won’t remember the stats, they’re not going to remember the games. But they’re going to remember how I treated people, how I carried myself throughout my time here and the impact that had.”

The Athletic’s Vic Tafur contributed reporting

 (Photo: Loren Orr / Getty Images)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Culture

MLB’s Strange But True 2024: The team, game, inning and homer of the year — plus The Ohtani Game

Published

on

MLB’s Strange But True 2024: The team, game, inning and homer of the year — plus The Ohtani Game

I swear this all happened in the Strange But True baseball year of 2024:

A man played for both teams in the same game. … Another guy made an out on his own intentional walk. … And history was made at Coors Field, all because a pitcher did not throw a pitch.

I mention all that because it’s time once again for the end-of-year extravaganza you’ve been waiting for — and we have enough material for three parts. Happy Strange But True Feats of the Year column to all who celebrate!


Clonehead of the Year — Danny Jansen


Danny Jansen takes the field with the Red Sox on Aug. 26 after starting the game — on June 26 — as a member of the Blue Jays. (Paul Rutherford / Getty Images)

Cloning technology isn’t roaring along at the same furious rate as, say, TikTok video technology. But in baseball, we have the next best thing to cloning — the suspended-game rule.

And how great is that rule — baseball’s special little world of suspended animation? So great that it gifted us with one of my favorite Strange But True Games of all time.

Advertisement

Presenting … The Danny Jansen Game.

Do we need to refresh your memory of what The Danny Jansen Game was? Let’s do that. On Aug. 26, the Red Sox and Blue Jays resumed a June 26 game at Fenway Park that had been suspended by many, many raindrops in the second inning.

What made that The Strange But True Game of the Year was this: When it was halted in June, Jansen was batting for the Blue Jays. And when it resumed (one awesome Sox-Jays trade-deadline extravaganza later), Jansen was catching for the Red Sox.

So what’s so Strange But True about that? Oh, only about a billion things like this:

Wanna play catch? It makes no logical sense that a player could get taken out of a game, and then, at the same exact moment, get subbed into that game for the other team — allowing him to start an actual big-league at-bat as the hitter and then finish it as the catcher. But hey, the suspended-game rule is inventive like that.

Advertisement

So who else has ever batted and caught in the same at-bat in a big-league game? Nobody. Obviously. But also …

The guy who was on first base when Jansen came to bat for the Blue Jays (Davis Schneider) then stole second base … on Danny Jansen the catcher!

All in the same at-bat, Jansen swung at a pitch as a Blue Jay and caught a pitch for the Red Sox!

As the brilliant multitasker he is, Jansen managed to come to bat for both teams in the top and bottom of the same inning (the second). If you’re wondering who else in history has done that, you should know that answer would also be: Nobody!

And don’t check the video, because while we have plenty of video evidence that Jansen set foot in the batter’s box for the Blue Jays in this game … and was stuck there for the next seven weeks (not literally!) … he did not get credit for a plate appearance for the Blue Jays. What do you mean, you saw it with your own eyes? Who cares? It’s baseball!

Advertisement

And don’t do the math, because that’s also a problem. Jansen got credited with a game played for Toronto that day. He also got credited with a game played for Boston. But he did not get credited with two games played in the same game. Because that’s not possible. So when does one plus one equal one? Only in … baseball!

And because the baseball gods are awesome, the last batter of this game could only have been one man: Danny Jansen, who caught the first pitch of the game for one team and then made the last out of the same game for the other team.

Well, there you go. All of that happened. In real life. We saw it. Danny Jansen lived it. It was real, and it was sensational.

So how, I asked him, would he explain to his grandkids someday that it was possible to play for both teams in the same game … in the major leagues?

“Baseball is incredible,” he said. “It’s always incredible. You can’t expect that anything in baseball can’t happen. Anything’s possible.

Advertisement

“This game,” said Jansen, “is nuts.”

Strangest But Truest Inning of the Year


Jazz Chisholm Jr. can’t handle Anthony Volpe’s throw as Kiké Hernández is safe at third in a nightmare fifth inning for New York. (Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

Speaking of nuts, what do you say we relive the fifth inning of Game 5 of the World Series. (All you Yankees fans out there … you’re not eligible to reply to that question!) Of course, we need to relive it. It’s in the running for the Strangest But Truest postseason inning ever.

To refresh your memory …

• When that inning began, the Yankees were leading the Dodgers in this game, 5-0 …

• And their starting pitcher, a literally unhittable dude named Gerrit Cole, was out there launching Formula 1 speedballs clocked at 99 mph …

Advertisement

• And the Dodgers had used many more pitchers (four) than they had hits (none) …

Whereupon … stuff began happening … by which I mean stuff like this, which involved the Yankees making baseball look so much harder than we’d like to think it is …

• There was Aaron Judge clanking a routine fly ball in center field. That was one error — by a guy who has committed zero errors on any of the other 538 fly balls hit to him in the center-field portion of his career.

• There was the shortstop, Gold Glove finalist Anthony Volpe, making an unfortunate throw to third on an attempted forceout. That was two errors.

• And then, with Cole one pitch away from escaping a bases-loaded, no-out disaster, he forgot one slight detail after Mookie Betts bounced a spinning five-hopper to Anthony Rizzo at first — the detail that involves a pitcher’s brain reminding him he’s supposed to cover first base on balls like that.

Technically, there was no “error” charged to Cole for that gaffe. But the magic word there is “technically,” because a zero-run inning became a five-run inning after Cole neglected to cover first.

So an inning that started with a Gerrit Cole no-hitter watch turned into an almost incomprehensible five-run inning for that team he was no-hitting. And not just any five-run inning. A five-run inning in which all five runs were unearned.

Which meant the Dodgers would go on to win the World Series … by winning a game in which they trailed by five runsAnd just so we’re clear, that’s a sentence that has never before been typed in the history of the World Series. But that’s not all, because …

How many other teams have ever had a game in which they …

Advertisement

• Blew a five-run lead (or larger)?

• Coughed up at least five unearned runs?

• Stuffed three errors into the box score?

• And included both a balk and catcher’s interference in those festivities?

How many teams have ever done that, you ask? According to our friends from STATS Perform, exactly one team has ever done that … at least since earned (and unearned) runs became an official stat in both leagues in 1913. And that team was …

Advertisement

The 2024 Yankees … in the game that ended this World Series.

But you should also know that … we’re not just talking about postseason games. The Yankees are the first team ever to do that in any game — postseason or regular season — in the past 112 seasons.

In other words, before that fateful evening on Oct. 30, you could have told us it was impossible to lose a World Series in a game like that, and who could have disputed it? But now … uh, never mind!

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Inside the Yankees’ grisly fifth inning that proved one of the most costly in World Series history

Special Game 5 bonus note 

What’s it like to be me, the unofficial curator of Baseball Strange But Trueness, after a World Series game like that? Hey, it’s awesome, because Strange But True Max Chaos had just busted out. But also … it can take a little time to sort out just how Strange But True something actually was.

Advertisement

It takes so much time, in fact, that I didn’t send in my column on that game until 7:05 the next morning!

But that’s because it literally took all night for me — plus the great Sam Hovland and my friends from STATS — to research all that wackiness. There were so many wild research projects going on, it wasn’t until the next day — when my brain fog lifted — that I remembered something.

I forgot to include one of STATS’ best notes of the whole night! But thanks to the Strange But True Feats of the Year column, we can present that tidbit now. Here it comes.

It turns out that it’s not just hard for a team to lose a World Series game in which it took a no-hitter and a five-run lead (or larger) into the fifth inning. It’s hard to do that in any kind of game. It’s so hard, in fact, that the Yankees hadn’t even lost a regular-season game like that since …

Oct. 1, 1988!

Advertisement

A Tommy John no-hit bid went up in smoke that day. And that was nearly 6,000 games ago!

It was so long ago that 177 different pitchers have started a game for the Yankees since then … so long ago that 441 different Yankees have grabbed a bat and headed for the batter’s box since then … and so long ago that Derek Jeter, Bernie Williams and Jorge Posada alone combined to bat almost 30,000 times in between — and then spent another decade in retirement.

In other words, a loss like that never happened to Jeter, Posada or Bernie in any October baseball game, or any other kind of baseball game. But it somehow happened to the Yankees, in the last game of this World Series, because, as John Sterling would tell you — Susan, that’s …

Baseball!

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Why Dodgers’ Game 5 win over Yankees was the craziest World Series clincher ever

Advertisement

Sneaky Pete’s Strangest But Truest Homer of the Year

Did you know that thanks to that Game 5 Yankees meltdown, this October set the all-time record for most lead changes in one postseason (with 30 of them)? My friend Katie Sharp of Baseball Reference went to way too much trouble to calculate that little nugget. So thanks, Katie!

That tidbit tells us there were far too many epic Strange But True October comebacks to fit into this column. But if I had to pick the Strangest But Truest of them all, I’m going with this one.

So what made that stunning swing of the bat by Pete Alonso so Strange But True? Thanks for asking!

Advertisement

Did that really happen? As the Mets came to bat in the ninth inning that night, in a winner-take-all Game 3 of their Wild Card Series in Milwaukee …

• They were trailing that game, 2-0, and were three outs from making tee-time reservations.

• None of their previous 17 hitters had gotten a hit! (They were 0-for-16, with one hit batter!)

• No Met but Francisco Lindor had gotten a hit since the seventh inning of Game 2! (His teammates were 0 for their last 29!)

• 105 Mets hitters had dug into the batter’s box in this series. They’d combined to hit zero home runs!

Advertisement

• Pete Alonso, who was about to bash that life-changing home run, was 5 for his past 41 (a .122 average) … and hadn’t had an extra-base hit since Sept. 19!

• The man on the mound, normally untouchable Brewers closer Devin Williams, hadn’t allowed a home run, to anyone, in 57 days — spanning 78 consecutive hitters. So since that last home run, the unfortunate humans who had to face him were batting .097, and “slugging” .153. And 36 of those 78 (46.2 percent) had struck out!

And then that closer served up a homer to that hitter in the ninth inning of that game, a winner-take-all October special? Whoa. But wait. It was even more improbable than that. Let’s talk more about …

The Devin Williams Factor — October is quite a month, isn’t it? You watch baseball, day after day, month after month, from April to September. You start to think you have a rough idea of what to expect. But if you’d spent any time watching Devin Williams, you would never have expected that.

• How many runs did the Brewers closer allow all season? That would be three, in 22 appearances. How many runs did he allow in the ninth inning of this game? That would be four. Granted, he was hurt for the first four months. But think about it. He gave up more runs in that inning than he’d given up all season? How Strange But True is that?

Advertisement

• This was the 116th time Williams had thrown a pitch in the ninth inning of any game, regular season or postseason, in his career. Want to guess how many times he’d allowed a lead-flipping (i.e., leading to trailing) home run in the ninth of any of those other 115 games? If you guessed “none,” you’re thinking right along with us here.

• Then there was that pitch. Until that wave of Alonso’s bat, Williams had thrown 190 of his killer changeups this season, according to Statcast. So how many of those 190 changeups had landed on the other side of the fence? Once again, “none” would be a great guess.

• And finally, there’s this: Think about how many pitchers have gone to the mound at least 150 times in the live-ball era. You know which of those pitchers had allowed the lowest slugging percentage in their whole career, when pitching with a lead? I think you do.

The answer, according to Baseball Reference/Stathead, was Devin Williams! Opposing hitters who found themselves in the position the Mets were in had “slugged” .254 against him. And then that happened.


With the odds stacked against him, Pete Alonso powered the Mets to a series-clinching win. (John Fisher / Getty Images)

Hey, but one more thing. Before we move on, you need to contemplate …

Advertisement

Where this fits on the list of iconic October moments – In Tim Britton’s sensational piece on this game in The Athletic, this Pete Alonso passage jumped out at me:

Did he understand Thursday night the magnitude of what he’d just achieved?

“Not right now,” he said with a smile, before a pause. “I don’t think I ever will.”

Or maybe he’ll stumble upon this edition of the Strange But True Feats of the Year column. What was the magnitude of this moment? Let’s fill him in on just how magnitudinous it really was.

A lead-flipping home run in the ninth inning of a winner-take-all game? OK, Pete. Take this in. The complete list of men who have ever hit one of those consists of … just you!

Advertisement

Yes, you read that right. No one in history had ever hit a home run, in the ninth inning of a winner-take-all postseason game, that turned a series loss into a series win until …

Pete Alonso hit That Homer off That Closer to leave Mets fans — and Strange But True fans — everywhere That Moment to remember him by. Amazin’.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Pete Alonso’s amazin’, improbable October home run and a Mets comeback for the ages

Strangest But Truest Team of the Year — the White Sox


Andrew Vaughn holds his head as the White Sox finish the final week of a brutal season. (Michael Reaves / Getty Images)

They lost more games than Choo Choo Coleman’s fabled 1962 Mets. Their fans tried to avoid recognition by hiding their faces under paper bags.

Their manager, Pedro Grifol, made it to 100 games under .500 (in less than two years), then got fired. They went nearly four weeks without winning a game. And when they finally won one, their stadium ran out of beer to wash it down with.

Advertisement

These were just the “highlights” of the Strange But True season of those 2024 Chicago White Sox. I promise I didn’t root for them to do any of this stuff. But I must admit that because they did, this portion of the column practically wrote itself.

How can there not be a major motion picture about this team? Out of the Money-ball. I’d watch it! Now here’s just some of what you’d see.

They knocked Casey Stengel out of the history books! Who said a team couldn’t lose more games than Stengel’s illustrious ’62 Mets (40-120), the longtime gold standard for futility? These White Sox proved it was totally possible. They even won five of their last six and still went 41-121.

How nuts was that? The Phillies won their 41st game on May 31. The White Sox won their 41st on the last day of the season … 121 days later!

They finished 41 games out of next-to-last place! Was 41 the ultimate White Sox magic number? The next-closest team in the AL Central (the Twins) finished 41 games ahead of them. And there was never a day all season when the White Sox were ahead of any team in their division.

Advertisement

The ’62 Mets only finished 18 games out of next-to-last place. The 119-loss 2003 Tigers only finished 20 games out of next-to-last. The worst team in the history of the planet, the 134-loss 1899 Cleveland Spiders, only finished 35 games out of next-to-last place. No team in the modern era had ever even finished 40 games out of next-to-last. But the White Sox were already 38 out of next-to-last before they even made it to September.

You didn’t need a web browser to find them in the standings. You needed a submarine.

They fell to 84 under .500! If you looked at the standings on Sept. 22, with a week to go in the season, I hope you wore your eclipse glasses — because the White Sox were an eyeball-shocking 84 games under .500 (36-120).

So how many other teams since 1900 have ever been 84 under at any point? None would be a good guess.

Only three other teams in the history of this sport reached 84 under — and it’s been a while: Those 1899 Spiders finished 114 under (20-134). … Kirtley Baker’s 1890 Pittsburgh Alleghenys finished 90 under (23-113). … And Toad Ramsey’s 1889 Louisville Colonels finished at exactly 84 under (27-111). Always great to walk with legends like those outfits.

Advertisement

They even caught Jeff Stone’s illustrious ’88 Orioles! What group of legendary losers didn’t the White Sox bring back to life this year? They even ran down the team with the longest losing streak in American League history, Jumpin’ Jeff Stone’s 1988 Orioles.

Those Orioles lost their first 21 games of the season, then spent the next three and a half decades in an orbit of their own. But here came the 2024 White Sox, to dredge up their own brand of 21-game losing-streak fun from July 10 to Aug. 5.

• You know how hard it is to go that long without winning? It’s so hard that 197 different pitchers won a game for the other 29 teams in that time when the White Sox were winning zero games. Yep, 197!

• It also takes a while to lose that many games. It took the White Sox so long that they used 38 different players during the streak. Yep, 38!

• One of those 38 was a rookie infielder named Brooks Baldwin. The really cool news was, he made his big-league debut for the White Sox on July 19. The not quite that cool news was, of the first 16 games he played in, his team lost all 16 of them.

Advertisement

• Oh, and one more thing: According to the Baseball Reference transactions page, since the trade deadline was going on during this run of ineptitude, an incredible 171 players got traded — all in that stretch when the White Sox never won a single freaking baseball game.

In other news, they also did all this!

• Would you believe the White Sox started the season by going 0-14 on games played on a Monday? Of course, they were 66 games under .500 on the other six days of the week, too.

• Would you believe they had a streak in the second half in which they went 1-27 at home? The Phillies only lost 26 games in Philadelphia the whole darned season. The White Sox lost 27 in their town in eight weeks.

• Would you believe that, in a related development, on Aug. 28-29, the Rangers won more games at Guaranteed Rate Field in 24 hours (three) than the White Sox had won in the previous 61 days and 13,660 hours (two)?

Advertisement

• Would you believe this team piled up so many losses, it was eliminated from any kind of playoff race on Aug. 17? That was Game 124, but who’s counting?

• Would you believe the White Sox were so good at losing, they lost more games before the end of August (106) than Michael Jordan’s Bulls lost in their six championship seasons combined (104)?

• And, finally, would you believe these White Sox went more than four months — from May 11 to Sept. 15 — without winning a series against a team from their own league? But what the heck? They only got to play 23 of those series in between!

These were your 2024 Chicago White Sox, chasing history — kind of in the way that “Daddy Day Camp” (Rotten Tomatoes score: 1) chased cinematic history.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

An owner who ‘thinks he knows everything’ led the White Sox to historic disaster

Advertisement

The man from the Planet Ohtanus


Shohei Ohtani had 17 total bases on his historic night in Miami. (Chris Arjoon / Getty Images)

I got to spend a few weeks this October watching Shohei Ohtani play. Here was the best part about doing that: I learned something about this guy.

There are many things in life — and also in baseball — that we’ve always described as “impossible.” But the man from Planet Ohtanus has no idea why the rest of us even use that word.

The stuff we think of as impossible is stuff he looks at and thinks: Hey, maybe I’ll wake up tomorrow and try to do that.

So that brings us to a performance we’ll dare to call The Ohtani Game. It might go down as the greatest game any baseball player has ever had. It’s also the game that most defied our ability to imagine what a human, a member of our species, could do over nine innings.

This was Sept. 19 in Miami — when Ohtani laid out this unfathomable Mission (Not) Impossible:

Advertisement

6-for-6

3 home runs

5 extra-base hits

2 stolen bases

10 RBIs …

Advertisement

And this box-score line never before witnessed in a major-league game:

6-4-6-10

Oh, yeah. And one more thing: It was in this game that he dropped all those feats on the day he became the first man ever to join the 50-Homer, 50-Steal Club.

Seriously!

So what are we to make of this performance of the Greatest Shoh on Earth? I’ve been thinking about that for three months. Here’s what:

Three homers, 10 RBIs and two stolen bases! Steven Kwan led off for the AL in the All-Star Game — and he never had a calendar month this year with three homers, 10 RBIs and two stolen bases. Neither did Bo Bichette. Neither did Javy Báez. But that was one day in the life of Shohei Ohtani. Unreal.

Six hits in one game. Does that seem like a lot? Let’s go with yes. Here are just some of the guys who never had a six-hit game: Ted Williams … Stan Musial … Derek Jeter … and the hit king, Pete Rose, who never did that once along the road to 4,256 hits.

Five extra-base hits in one game. Did you know that Babe Freaking Ruth never got five extra-base hits in one game? Neither did Albert Pujols. How ’bout Barry Bonds? Nope. Not him, either. And remember the artist formerly known as José Abreu? He didn’t even get five extra-base hits all season. But the amazing Shohei got five in three hours, because why the heck not?

Three homers in one game. I know it seems like lots of random dudes are running around hitting three bombs in a game these days. But just for perspective, you want to hear the names of a few guys who never had a three-homer game? Well, David Ortiz for one. And Fred McGriff. Not to mention Vladimir Guerrero — both of them.

Advertisement

10 RBIs in one game. I could go on for hours spitting out the names of guys who never drove in 10 runs in one game. But here are a few you may be familiar with: Willie Mays. Mickey Mantle. Henry Aaron. Ted Williams. And Miguel Cabrera.

10 RBIs and two stolen bases in one game. So … do you think anybody else ever had a game with that many RBIs and that many steals? Get a grip. Before Ohtani, only 15 players had ever had a game with just the 10-RBI part of that daily double. You know how many stolen bases those 15 men combined for in those games? That would be exactly … zero!

10 RBIs from the leadoff hitter? Richie Ashburn was a Hall of Fame leadoff man for the Phillies. In 1959, he got to the plate 427 times in the leadoff hole – and drove in a total of eight runs. Sixty-five years later, along came this superhero from Planet Ohtanus — and drove in 10 out of the leadoff hole in six trips to the plate? Yeah, he did. So how many other leadoff hitters have ever had a 10-RBI game in the 105 seasons since RBIs became an official stat? Once again, that answer would be … zero!

Yeah, but he did all of that! Let’s sum it all up. As my friends from STATS reminded us, in those same 105 seasons, only one player has had, during his entire career …

• A game with 10+ RBIs

Advertisement

A game with 6+ hits

A game with 5+ extra-base hits

A game with 3+ home runs

A game with 2+ stolen bases

 (That’s not necessarily in the same game. That’s in any combination of games.)

Advertisement

That one player? Shohei Ohtani.

Who did all of it in The Ohtani Game.

Welcome to one afternoon in the life of Shohei Ohtani, who ohbytheway also once started the All-Star Game as a pitcher and was the closer in the championship game of the World Baseball Classic. But as I was saying, nothing is impossible on Planet Ohtanus.


The Year in Strange But True

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

MLB’s most mind-blowing hitting, pitching feats of the year — plus the 5 most ridiculous games

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

MLB’s weirdest injuries of 2024: Beware of water bottles, heating pads and walls

Advertisement

(Top photo of Shohei Ohtani hitting his 50th home run of the season: Megan Briggs / Getty Images)

Continue Reading

Culture

What has gotten into Kirby Smart? ‘I just want to fight for my team and fight for our program’

Published

on

What has gotten into Kirby Smart? ‘I just want to fight for my team and fight for our program’

ATHENS, Ga. — In the nine years Paul Finebaum had been interviewing Kirby Smart, this was as animated as Finebaum had seen Smart. They were on set together last month on Georgia’s campus, a day before the Dawgs’ game against Tennessee. It was three days after the College Football Playoff committee had dropped Smart’s team out of the projected field, and Smart was not hiding his disgust.

“He was great on the air. Off the air, he was out of this world. I mean he was genuinely angry,” Finebaum recalled last week. “I appreciated his candor. But it was a remarkable shift, especially to the last two years.”

And Smart wasn’t done. A night later, he went off on the selection committee again during his ABC postgame interview. And Smart still wasn’t done: A few weeks later, Smart took an unprompted shot — maybe playful, maybe not — at SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, who was standing a few feet away.

It has been refreshing for those who want good content. For those who have watched Smart and his sideline antics from afar, it may seem natural. But for those who have watched Smart closely through the years, it’s a stark change, and it says a lot about where Smart and No. 2 Georgia are as they get ready for their CFP quarterfinal.

The Pulse Newsletter
Advertisement

Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox.

Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox.

Sign UpBuy The Pulse Newsletter

Smart usually has tried to avoid making headlines, a trait he took from Nick Saban: Do your job, worry about your team, ignore the critics and outside noise. The tone was set the summer of Smart’s first year when then-Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh took a shot at Smart on Twitter about satellite camps. When he asked about it, Smart replied, “What tweet?” with a wry, knowing smile. He was ready to diffuse the story.

This season, Smart has been willing to light the fuse.


Georgia coach Kirby Smart’s Bulldogs will play Notre Dame in the Sugar Bowl. (Joshua L. Jones / USA Today Network via Imagn Images)

After Georgia’s win at Texas, Smart didn’t hold back in his ESPN postgame interview after officials reversed a call in Texas’ favor when fans threw debris on the field: “You know, these players get the best out of me. And I’m so proud of these guys. Because nobody believed. Nobody gave us a chance. Your whole network doubted us. Nobody believed us. And then they try to rob us, with calls, in this place.”

The shot at the “College GameDay” analysts who picked against Georgia wasn’t new. Smart did that after his team’s second national championship win. But “they try to rob us” was uncharacteristic. Smart, a member of the NCAA rules committee, rarely criticized officiating and didn’t join in with Georgia fans belaboring calls after the 2018 national championship game. Now he was jumping in, despite actually winning the game.

Advertisement

After his team’s win over Tennessee, Smart vented his frustration at the CFP committee, once again in his ESPN postgame interview: “I don’t know what they look for. I really don’t know what they look for anymore. I would welcome anybody in that committee to come down to this league and play in this environment.”

And finally, in the interview after the SEC Championship Game win, Smart was asked what getting a first-round bye meant: “It means rest for a team that Greg Sankey and his staff sent on the road … all … year … long!”

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Who does Georgia want to play: Notre Dame or Indiana?

Sankey stood stone-faced a few feet away but only because he couldn’t hear what Smart was saying amid audio issues on stage, according to people who were there. Not that Sankey and his staff could have been particularly thrilled with it; Georgia had just navigated that schedule to a conference championship, so Finebaum on his SEC Network show called Smart “out of line.” (The SEC championship in Atlanta came after three straight home games, so Georgia had been in its home state for almost a month.)

“I probably reacted a little quickly on that, not knowing how convoluted the story (on the stage) was,” Finebaum said. “But it was still a pretty dramatic moment for him.”

Advertisement

Smart was asked last month, after the Tennessee game, why he had been more outspoken this year. He shrugged and said it just has more to do with having more things to be outspoken about.

“The two years previous, I mean, there wasn’t a lot there,” he said. “The year that, we were 14-1 and 15-0, there’s not a lot of complaints. There’s not a lot to fight for. You take care of business on the field and handle your business. You don’t have to say a lot of things.

“That was a pretty unique situation if you’re referring to Texas. I don’t know that I’ve ever been a part of anything like that, and I’m not … I wasn’t upset with them. I just didn’t understand, like, never seen that happen, but I would have said that any year.”

But the next thing Smart said got to the heart of the matter: “I just want to fight for my team and fight for our program because I think we’ve got a deserving group of young men who work really hard, and I’m sure every coach would fight for their guys.”

But this has come amid two years of bad publicity about his program. Ten Georgia players and one staff member have been arrested for driving-related offenses since a January 2023 car crash that killed a player and staff member. There have been arrests for non-driving issues. Given all that, you almost would expect Smart to take the opposite approach and be Mr. Nice Guy as the face of the program.

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Is Kirby Smart ready to sit on Nick Saban’s vacated college football throne?

Finebaum, however, pointed out that Smart has chosen his words much more carefully when it comes to off-field issues.

“The one thing I’ll give him credit for is despite all the bad news in the offseason I think he navigated it very well,” Finebaum said. “And it didn’t seem to become a constant theme, like situations like that at other schools.”

Finebaum has another theory for Smart’s newfound candor: The pressure is gone. There’s no push for a three-peat or before that a repeat or before that trying to get the first national championship.

“Everything felt more tense (before). You could sense the gravity of the moment,” Finebaum said. “That was all gone a couple weeks ago in Athens. It was me against the world, and he seemed to like it very much.”

Advertisement

Smart has used that Georgia-against-the-world narrative before, especially en route to the second championship. It became such a punch line that Smart backed off it a bit. It was harder to play the disrespect card when Georgia was the consensus No. 1 team, even after not three-peating last year.

Then came this season’s run of on-field adversity. Smart took to calling his team the “never say die Dawgs.” They made things hard for themselves and played down to their competition, but there they still hoisted the SEC championship trophy.

Now it’s on to the Playoff where Georgia may be in the perfect position, at least to Smart’s liking: It’s not the favorite, especially having to go to its backup quarterback, so there are plenty of picks out there for the Bulldogs to be one-and-done in the tournament.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

An expert on Carson Beck timeline: ‘I wouldn’t think he’s playing anytime soon’

Somehow, it could be argued that Georgia is playing with house money.

Advertisement

“Ultimately how the season ends is going to help frame the narrative,” Finebaum said. “If somehow Georgia wins the title with everything they’ve overcome, with the schedule, with the Carson Beck injury, I think it will elevate Georgia to an even higher status. And right now, I think they are at the very top shelf of college football. … But I think if (Georgia) can pull this thing off, it won’t make up for not winning a three-peat, but it’s going to put Georgia into a completely different stratosphere.”

(Top photo: Butch Dill / Getty Images)

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending