Connect with us

Culture

Jordan Chiles, in an Olympic gymnastics comedy of errors, gets another raw deal

Published

on

Jordan Chiles, in an Olympic gymnastics comedy of errors, gets another raw deal

We ask a lot of our Olympic athletes — to perform with grace and humility, to carry the Olympic spirit even as they pursue their own individual goals; to abide by the rules, and to accept their fates, however they may go, with dignity.

Jordan Chiles has exemplified all of that in these Paris Olympic Games.

Is it so much to ask the people who hold her Olympic dreams in their hands to do the same?

What is happening — and has happened — to Chiles and, by extension, Romania’s Ana Bărbosu, is a travesty of borderline technical malfeasance that has toyed with the emotions of two women who have done nothing wrong.

On Monday afternoon at Bercy Arena, Chiles finished her floor routine in the event final, scoring a 13.666, just out of reach of the 13.700 awarded to Bărbosu and Sabrina Maneca-Voinea and off the medal podium. Bărbosu, whose execution score was higher than her teammate’s, was awarded the bronze. Cecile Landi, Chiles’ coach, however, asked the judges to review the difficulty for one of the elements in Chiles’ floor routine. The request went ahead to the technical chair who agreed that, upon review, Chiles was not scored appropriately. Immediately her 13.666 was upped to a 13.766. She was the bronze medalist, not Bărbosu.

Advertisement

While Chiles sobbed in joy and Simone Biles enveloped her in a bear hug, Bărbosu cried in agony, gutted by the review that demoted her to the dreaded fourth position. It was the Olympic experience writ large, in all of its pain and glory.

Now it turns out, the U.S. failed to beat the buzzer, according to a Court of Arbitration for Sport ruling revealed Saturday. Inquiries, by rule, must be filed within a minute of the conclusion of a routine. Landi asked too late — four seconds too late, according to a USA Gymnastics source. Which, hey, that’s more than fair — even in a subjective sport such as gymnastics, a deadline is a deadline.

But the trail to that result is a comedy of errors, none perpetuated by the gymnasts involved, and yet they are the only ones made to suffer.

Consider the lunacy: Chiles’ difficulty was erroneously scored and corrected only because a coach suggested the judges take a second look, but that judging mistake has since been disregarded because the Romanians realized that someone else failed to keep his or her eye on a clock, and allowed an inquiry to go forward when it shouldn’t have. The result: Chiles is back to a 13.666 (even though her difficulty should have made it a 13.766 in the first place), and the Court of Arbitration for Sport punted the whole thing, asking FIG, the international gymnastics governing body, to figure out who gets the bronze. The Romanians asked that all three gymnasts share the bronze, which seems fair, but at best requires an asterisk next to their names.

This all took five days to sort out. Five glorious days for Chiles, who already had been made to endure the rollercoaster of gymnastics rule foolishness. On the first day of competition, during the qualification round, Chiles finished fourth in the overall all-around standings. The top 24 women quality; except Chiles, while fourth overall, was third on the U.S. team, and Olympic gymnastics apparently likes to treat itself more like 4-year-old Sunday afternoon soccer, where everyone gets to participate. Each delegation can only send two women forward to the final, which meant that Chiles’ teammate, Sunisa Lee, who topped Chiles by 0.067, got the nod and Chiles did not.

Advertisement

Simone Biles and Jordan Chiles celebrate after Chiles’ floor routine difficulty score was changed to make her the bronze medalist. Now, that’s all in question. (Naomi Baker / Getty Images)

A devastated Chiles spent two days licking her wounds but then, in a real-time show of the Olympic spirit, returned to help the U.S. secure a team gold two days later. She later showed up to cheer on Lee and Simone Biles in the all-around, while focusing her own energies on the event final, in search of her first personal medal.

Chiles competed last in the floor final and will be the first to admit she could have hit her routine more cleanly. She was packing up her things as Landi put in the inquiry and when the announcer flashed her new score, she finally was given her moment. But Chiles instead opted to celebrate her peers and not herself. From her side of the podium, Chiles caught Biles’ eye hatching a plan, and when Brazil’s Rebeca Andrade stepped to the podium for her gold medal, Chiles and Biles bowed.

It was an extraordinary act of grace conceived by a woman who had shown nothing but grace all week. For five glorious days, Chiles felt the beautiful weight of an Olympic medal around her neck, and did the very American version of a victory lap, visiting Disneyland Paris and making the morning-show circuit. She was, as she declared herself, That Girl.

That Girl just announced she’s taking a break from social media to concentrate on her mental health. The people in charge seem to have finally done what nothing else could: douse Jordan Chiles’ Olympic spirit. Her last post: a string of broken-hearted emojis.

(Top photo of Jordan Chiles after the floor routine at the Paris Olympics: Jamie Squire / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Culture

Try This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies

Published

on

Try This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies

Welcome to Great Adaptations, the Book Review’s regular multiple-choice quiz about printed works that have gone on to find new life as movies, television shows, theatrical productions and more. This week’s challenge highlights thrillers first published as novels (or graphic novels) that were adapted into popular films. Just tap or click your answers to the five questions below. And scroll down after you finish the last question for links to the books and their screen versions.

Continue Reading

Culture

Test Your Knowledge of the Authors and Events That Helped Shape the United States

Published

on

Test Your Knowledge of the Authors and Events That Helped Shape the United States

Welcome to Lit Trivia, the Book Review’s regular quiz about books, authors and literary culture. In honor of Gen. George Washington’s birthday on Feb. 22, this week’s super-size challenge is focused on the literature and history related to the American Revolution. In the 10 multiple-choice questions below, tap or click on the answer you think is correct. After the last question, you’ll find links to exhibits, books and other materials related to this intense chapter in the country’s story, including an award-winning biography of the general and first U.S. president.

Continue Reading

Culture

Video: How Much Do You Know About Romance Books?

Published

on

Video: How Much Do You Know About Romance Books?

Let’s play romance roulette. No genre has dominated the books world in the last few years. Like romance, it accounts for the biggest percentage of book sales, their avid fan bases. Everyone has been talking about romance as a Book Review editor and as a fan of the genre myself, I put together a to z glossary of 101 terms that you should know if you want to understand the world of romance are cinnamon roll. You may think a cinnamon roll is a delicious breakfast treat, but in a romance novel, this refers to a typically male character who is so sweet and tender and precious that you just want to protect him and his beautiful heart from the world. Ooh, a rake. This is basically the Playboy of historical romance. He defies societal rules. He drinks, he gambles. He’s out on the town all night and is a very prolific lover with a bit of a reputation as a ladies’ man. FEI these are super strong, super sexy, super powerful, immortal, fairy like creatures. One of my favorite discoveries in terms that I learned was stern brunch daddy. A lot of daddy’s usually a male love interest who seems very intimidating and alpha, but then turns out to be a total softie who just wants to make his love interest brunch. I think there’s a misconception that because these books can follow these typical patterns, that they can be predictable and boring. But I think what makes a really great romance novel is the way that these writers use the tropes in interesting ways, or subvert them. If you can think of it, there’s probably a romance novel about it. Oops, there’s only one bed. This is one of my personal favorite tropes is a twist on forced proximity. Characters find themselves in very close quarters, where inevitably sparks start to fly. Why choose is the porkulus dose of the romance world. Sometimes the best way to resolve a love triangle is by turning it into a circle, where everyone is invited to play. Oops, we lost one spice level. There’s a really wide spectrum. You can range from really low heat or no spice, what might also be called kisses. Only then you start to get into what we call closed door or fade to Black. These books go right up to the moment of intimacy, and then you get into what we call open door, which is more explicit. And sometimes these can get very high heat or spicy and even start verging into kink. There’s one thing that almost every romance novel has in common. It’s that no matter what the characters get up to in the end, it ends with a happily ever after. I say almost every romance novel. Sometimes you’re just happy for now.

Continue Reading

Trending