Connect with us

Culture

Are the Next Global Tennis Stars Among These ’Tweens?

Published

on

Are the Next Global Tennis Stars Among These ’Tweens?

ACHARNES, Greece — Behold Dominik Defoe. Ten years outdated and barely taller than the online. Golden brown shoulder-length curls bouncing within the air as he chases and crushes tennis balls, which he does higher than simply about any child his age.

Defoe likes to fiddle with the GPS in his mom’s automotive, so within the morning after they head to highschool, the telephone directs them to Roland Garros, website of the French Open. He does it so usually that his mom is aware of Roland Garros is 2 hours 47 minutes away from their residence in Belgium.

Defoe was almost in tears earlier this yr when he acquired one of many 48 invites from IMG, the sports activities and leisure conglomerate, to attend the primary Future Stars Invitational Event on the posh Tatoi Membership within the northern suburbs of Athens. The occasion, for girls and boys aged 12 and underneath, is each a match and a weeklong schooling within the life that may await Defoe and his rarefied friends, full with seminars led by executives at Nike and the boys’s and girls’s professional excursions, the ATP and the WTA.

The race to seek out the game’s subsequent stars has come to this: With eight-figure fortunes probably at stake, brokers and scouts are evaluating and cultivating gamers even youthful than 10 who’re simply getting began in severe competitors. Future Stars is the latest and most extravagant recruitment effort for IMG, the corporate that basically invented the sports activities illustration enterprise and dominated tennis for years.

“No one needs to have a match for 11- and 12-year-olds,” stated Max Eisenbud, who leads the corporate’s tennis division. “I’d somewhat wait, however the competitors pressured us into this case.”

Advertisement

For years, IMG’s brokers collected future stars in two methods: Tweens and younger teenagers (Maria Sharapova for instance) both confirmed up at its academy in Bradenton, Fla., as soon as the premier coaching floor within the sport, in search of one of many plentiful scholarships; or the brokers confirmed up in Tarbes, France, for Les Petit As, the world’s premier match for gamers youthful than 14. There, they usually had one thing near the choose of the litter.

In the course of the previous decade although, rival academies opened throughout Europe and IMG’s academy targeted extra on making the most of households paying tuition somewhat than making long-shot bets on youngsters. Additionally, in recent times, when Eisenbud and his colleagues made their annual journeys to Les Petit As, they discovered that just about all essentially the most promising gamers had already signed contracts with different administration corporations, a lot of them well-funded boutique operations that have been providing beneficiant monetary ensures, generally stretching effectively past protecting the roughly $50,000 annual value for teaching and journey on the junior circuit.

And so, in an indication of cutthroat occasions in tennis, IMG is aiming youthful, even when prospecting preteen expertise might be almost unattainable and extremely fraught, risking growing the stress on youngsters who already put a lot on themselves and, in some instances, carry the monetary duties for his or her struggling households.

If stars like Naomi Osaka and Bianca Andreescu, Grand Slam match champions who’re of their 20s, have needed to take breaks from tennis to care for his or her psychological well being, it’s not a stretch to think about the dangers of elevating expectations so explicitly for prepubescent youngsters. Throughout a chat for the women on how one can keep bodily and mentally wholesome, Saga Shermis, an athlete improvement specialist with the WTA, stated she anticipated to see them on the tour within the coming years. It may be lots.

“At this age they’re nonetheless studying,” stated Adam Molenda, a youth coach with Poland’s tennis federation, after watching two of his gamers, Antonina Snochowska and Maja Schweika, rally for an hour on Monday. “You by no means can say who will make it. Life is filled with surprises.”

Advertisement

And selections.

Grace Bernstein, a younger Swedish standout, floated throughout the courtroom and blasted balls towards a boy as her mom watched from the fence. Whether or not she performs tennis or playing cards, Bernstein competes relentlessly, stated her mom, Catharina, a former participant whose singles rating peaked at 286 in 1991. She performs at an academy run by Magnus Norman, as soon as the world’s second-ranked males’s singles participant. She can be a prime soccer participant.

“She goes forwards and backwards, however for now it’s tennis, so she performs tennis,” Catharina Bernstein stated.

For some, fame and fortune actually can appear inevitable. Eisenbud famously signed Sharapova when she was 11 years outdated after watching her hit for 45 minutes with an depth and flawlessness he had by no means earlier than seen. Carlos Alcaraz, who turns 19 on Thursday and is already the most popular younger participant within the males’s sport, was deemed worthy of funding as a can’t-miss 11-year-old, too. Then once more, Eisenbud was positive the primary participant he signed, Horia Tecau of Romania, was destined for greatness. Tecau grew to become a prime doubles specialist however by no means cracked the highest 300 in singles.

Eisenbud hatched his plan 18 months in the past for a lavish competitors with most bills coated and all of the perks of an expert occasion — ball children, chair umpires, immaculate crimson clay courts, Beats headphones and swag from Nike for all the youngsters.

Advertisement

“We need to deal with them like skilled athletes,” stated Elli Vizantiou, the chief govt of the Tatoi Membership.

Not totally forgetting they’re children, there was additionally a treasure hunt, group dinners every evening and a tour of the Parthenon. IMG introduced in Alcaraz, recent off his win within the Barcelona Open last, to play an exhibition towards Hubert Hurkacz, the 14th-ranked males’s singles participant.

Assembling the Future Stars subject required months of interviews with coaches and tennis federation officers everywhere in the world, evaluating resumes and match outcomes, and scouring movies, in search of the magical mixture of athleticism and ability. Making a globally consultant subject was vital, too. Discovering a future prime 50 participant from a rustic or a demographic group that has by no means produced a tennis star could possibly be groundbreaking and extremely profitable.

Gamers needed to include a chaperone, which typically was a mother or father, and a coach, giving IMG the possibility to construct relationships..

Credit score…Gary I. Rothstein for The New York Occasions

Eisenbud inspired the coaches to pepper the Italian coach Riccardo Piatti, who led a training seminar, with questions, describing him because the “greatest” on the earth.

Advertisement

Piatti spent Tuesday morning with an eye fixed on Tyson Grant, a prime under-12 participant whose household he has been working with for almost seven years. Piatti additionally oversees the teaching for Tyson’s 14-year-old sister, Tyra, who’s already an IMG consumer. Tyson and Tyra’s father, Tyrone Grant, is almost 6-foot-8 and performed basketball professionally for a decade in Europe. With good genes, an early begin and steering from a famend coach, Tyson Grant could possibly be a good guess.

A number of courts over, Haniya Minhas was ripping one of many nice younger backhands, which she begins with the nub of her racket deal with nearly resting on her again hip.

“My favourite shot,” she stated. “Everybody tells me to increase my arms, however I like the way in which I do it.”

Minhas, 11, is Pakistani and Muslim. She performs in a hijab, lengthy sleeves and tights, and already seems like a billboard within the making.

She has been profitable tournaments since she was 5 years outdated. Her seek for appropriate competitors has taken her from Pakistan, the place there may be little assist for ladies’ sports activities and the place she competed towards and beat the entire boys her age, to Turkey. Her mom, Annie, stated she and her daughter need to show that somebody who seems and attire in a different way from most gamers and is from a rustic that has by no means had a tennis star can beat anybody. They anticipate to signal with an agent when Haniya turns 12.

Advertisement

“We are attempting to alter the pondering,” Annie Minhas stated.

Teo Davidov has a neat trick. Davidov, arguably the highest boys’ participant underneath 12, lives in Florida. His dad and mom moved from Bulgaria to Colorado a decade in the past when his father gained the inexperienced card lottery. Born right-handed, he hits forehands on either side and might serve with both hand, too. His father and coach, Kalin, began making an attempt to make Teo ambidextrous in tennis when he was 8 years outdated as a result of he was hyperactive. Kalin thought that stimulating the suitable hemisphere of his mind, which controls consideration and reminiscence, and the left facet of the physique, with left-handed workout routines, would make him calmer.

“Hopefully it additionally helps his sport,” stated Kalin Davidov. The method is devastating for now, however a prime participant has by no means succeeded by enjoying that method.

The Davidovs first bought to know Eisenbud and IMG three years in the past, after Kalin posted a video of his son’s double-forehand sport on Fb. Quickly, the telephone rang. Babolat, the French racket maker, is a sponsor.

Michael Chang, who gained the French Open in 1989 at 17, got here together with his daughter, Lani, who displayed an awfully familiar-looking drop shot and buried her nostril in a Rick Riordan novel on the shuttle bus between the courts and the lodge. Chang stated the circuit for younger juniors has reworked since his childhood, with way more journey and worldwide competitors.

Advertisement

“They’re getting a style of what it’s like,” he stated.

Gunther Darkey, a former middling professional from Britain, introduced his son, Denzell, a prime prospect and one of many few Black elite juniors for the Garden Tennis Affiliation. Alcaraz has a 10-year-old brother, Jaime, who was ok to obtain an invite. So was Meghan Knight, the daughter of a widely known cricketer from England.

“You’ve bought to be the type of one that from 9 years outdated can enhance constantly whereas taking losses each week for 10 or 15 years,” stated Seb Lavie, who introduced two gamers from his academy in Auckland, New Zealand.

Dominik Defoe insisted he’s ready for no matter it takes to make it. He was simply in regards to the smallest of the 2 dozen boys. He nonetheless performs with a junior-size racket and struggled to maintain up with Grant in his first match. His opponents all attempt to hit with heavy topspin to bury him within the backcourt. He swats the ball again on a brief hop earlier than it kicks above his head.

Defoe, who’s fluent in 4 languages, promised himself as a toddler that he would win the French Open. He has constructed his existence round giving himself the perfect probability to make that occur.

Advertisement

He attends faculty within the morning for math and language classes, however he works independently on the remainder of his research to unencumber extra hours for tennis. Learning the professionals carefully, he determined to not have one favourite however constructed a composite participant who has Dominic Thiem’s forehand, Nick Kyrgios’s serve, Novak Djokovic’s backhand, Rafael Nadal’s perspective, Roger Federer’s web sport and Felix Auger-Aliassime’s footwork. He practices mindfulness by writing in a journal.

“He informed me after we have been coming right here that this journey was like a prepare experience,” stated his mom, Rachel, who was his first coach. “This is only one cease, one station. Then the prepare goes on.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Culture

The Books We’re Excited About in Early 2025

Published

on

The Books We’re Excited About in Early 2025

A new year means new books to look forward to, and 2025 already promises a bounty — from the first volume of Bill Gates’s memoirs to a new novel by the reigning Nobel laureate, Han Kang, to a biography of Rosemary Woodruff Leary, the wife and psychedelic collaborator of the counterculture pioneer Timothy Leary.

On this week’s episode, Gilbert Cruz and Joumana Khatib talk about some of the upcoming books they’re most anticipating over the next several months.

Books discussed:

“Stone Yard Devotional,” by Charlotte Wood

“Silence,” by Pico Iyer

Advertisement

“Onyx Storm,” by Rebecca Yarros

“Gliff,” by Ali Smith

“The Dream Hotel,” by Laila Lalami

“The Colony,” by Annika Norlin

“We Do Not Part,” by Han Kang

Advertisement

“Playworld,” by Adam Ross

“Death of the Author,” by Nnedi Okorafor

“The Acid Queen: The Psychedelic Life and Counterculture Rebellion of Rosemary Woodruff Leary,” by Susannah Cahalan

“Tilt,” by Emma Pattee

“Dream Count,” by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

Advertisement

“Hope: The Autobiography,” by Pope Francis

“Jesus Wept: Seven Popes and the Battle for the Soul of the Catholic Church,” by Philip Shenon

“The Antidote,” by Karen Russell

“Source Code,” by Bill Gates

“Great Big Beautiful Life,” by Emily Henry

Advertisement

“Sunrise on the Reaping,” by Suzanne Collins

We would love to hear your thoughts about this episode, and about the Book Review’s podcast in general. You can send them to books@nytimes.com.

Continue Reading

Culture

Grand Slam prize money is enormous. The economics of tennis tournaments is complicated

Published

on

Grand Slam prize money is enormous. The economics of tennis tournaments is complicated

Four times a year, one of the biggest and most important tennis tournaments in the world sends out an announcement full of dollar signs and zeroes with the words “record prize money” scattered liberally.

The four Grand Slams, the first of which begins Sunday in Melbourne, are the high points of the tennis calendar. Players at the 2025 Australian Open will compete for $59million (£47m) this year — over $6.2m more than last year. In 2024, the four tournaments paid out over $250m between them, while their leaders spent the year aligning themselves with the players who make their events unmissable, whose gravity pulls in the broadcast deals and sponsorships, with their own dollar signs and zeroes.

Led by Australian Open chief Craig Tiley, the Grand Slams led the movement for a so-called premium tour which would pare down the overloaded tennis calendar and guarantee top players always being in the same events, let alone time zones. It would also lock swaths of the globe out of the worldwide spectacle that tennis represents.

The great irony is that despite the largesse and the cozy relationship, the players get a smaller cut of the money at the Grand Slams than they do in most of the rest of the rest of that hectic, endless season — and a fraction of what the best athletes in other sports collect from their events. The Australian Open’s prize pool amounts to about a 15-20 percent cut of the overall revenues of Tennis Australia, the organization that owns and stages the tournament, which accounts for nearly all of its annual revenue. The exact numbers at the French Open, Wimbledon and U.S. Open vary, but that essential split is roughly a constant. The 2023 U.S. Open had a prize pool of $65m against earned revenue from the tournament that came out at just over $514m, putting the cut at about 12 percent. The U.S. Open accounted for just under 90 percent of USTA revenues that year.

The explanations from the Grand Slams, which collectively generate over $1.5bn (£1.2bn) a year, run the gamut. They need to dedicate hundreds of millions of dollars each year to fund junior tennis development and other, less profitable tournaments in their respective nations — an obligation pro sports leagues don’t have. There is a constant need to upgrade their facilities, in the silent race for prestige and primacy of which the constant prize money one-upmanship is just one element.

Advertisement

Aryna Sabalenka with her winner’s check at the 2024 U.S. Open. (Emaz / Corbis via Getty Images)

That dynamic is not lost on players — least of all Novak Djokovic, the top men’s player of the modern era and a co-founder of the five-year-old Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA).

“I’m just going to state a fact,” Djokovic said during a post-match news conference in Brisbane last week.  “The pie split between the governing bodies in major sports, all major American sports, like NFL, NBA, baseball, NHL, is 50 percent. Maybe more, maybe less, but around 50 percent.

“Ours is way lower than that.”


Since 1968, the first year in which the four majors offered prize money as part of the Open Era’s embrace of professional tennis players, the purses have only grown. The 1968 French Open was the first to offer prize money, with Ken Rosewall earning just over $3,000 for beating Rod Laver in the final. The women’s singles champion, Nancy Richey, was still an amateur player, so could not claim her $1,000 prize. By 1973, lobbying from Billie Jean King helped convince the U.S. Open to make prize money equal for men and women through the draws; it took another 28 years for the Australian Open to do so year in, year out. Venus Williams’ intervention helped force the French Open and Wimbledon to follow suit in 2007.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

‘I think we deserve better’: How and why tennis lets women down

Advertisement

Fifty years after Rosewall’s triumph in Paris, the 2018 men’s champion Rafael Nadal took home $2.35million, an increase of over 73,000 percent. The year-on-year increases at each major are more modest, usually between 10 and 12 percent, but that percentage of tournament revenue remains steadfast, if not entirely immovable.

The Grand Slams argue that there are plenty of hungry mouths at their table, many more than just the 128 players that enter each singles draw each year.

Tennis Australia is a not-for-profit and a business model built on significant investment into delivering the event and promoting the sport to drive momentum on revenue and deliver consistently increasing prize money,” Darren Pearce, the organization’s chief spokesperson, said in a statement this week.

Money from the Australian Open also helps fund tournaments in Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart, as well as the United Cup, the combined men’s and women’s event in Perth and Sydney. Pearce said the prize money increases outpace the revenue growth.

The Grand Slams also point to the millions of dollars they spend on player travel, housing, transportation and meals during tournaments, though team sport athletes receive those as well. Eloise Tyson, a spokesperson for the All England Lawn Tennis Club, which stages Wimbledon, noted that overall Grand Slam prize money had risen from $209million in 2022 to $254m last year, a 22 percent increase.

Advertisement

“Alongside increasing our player compensation year-on-year, we continue to make significant investment into the facilities and services available for players and their teams at The Championships,” Tyson wrote in an email.

Officials with France’s tennis federation, the FFT, which owns the French Open, did not respond to a request for comment.

Brendan McIntyre, a spokesman for the United States Tennis Association, which owns the U.S. Open, released a statement this week touting the USTA’s pride in its leadership on player compensation, including offering equal prize money and the largest combined purse in tennis history at the 2024 US Open. A first-round exit earned $100,000, up 72 percent from 2019. Just making the qualifying draw was good for $25,000.

“As the national governing body for tennis in the U.S, we have a broader financial obligation to the sport as a whole,” the organization said.

“The USTA’s mission is to grow tennis at all levels, both in the U.S. and globally, and to make the sport accessible to all individuals in order to inspire healthier people and communities.”

Advertisement

The infrastructure required to stage a Grand Slam tournament is vast — on and off the court. (Glen Davis / Getty Images)

None of the organizations outlined a specific formula for determining the amount of prize money they offered each year, which is roughly the same as a percentage of their parent organizations overall revenues. That may be a coincidence, though the Grand Slams also have the benefit of not facing any threat to their primacy.

The USTA’s statement gestures at how the structure of tennis contributes to this financial irony. In soccer, countries and cities bid to host the Champions League and World Cup finals; the Olympics changes every four years and even the Super Bowl in the NFL moves around the United States, with cities and franchises trying to one-up one another.

The four Grand Slams, though, are the four Grand Slams. There are good reasons for this beyond prestige: the infrastructure, both physical and learned, required to host a two- or three-week event at the scale of a major year in, year out is available to a vanishingly small number of tennis facilities around the world. There is no opportunity for another organization or event to bid to replace one of the Grand Slams by offering a richer purse or other amenities.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

A year ago, tennis was broken. It’s more broken now


This dynamic has been in place for years and has become more important in recent months. The PTPA has hired a group of antitrust lawyers to evaluate the structure of tennis. The lawyers are compiling a report on whether the the sport includes elements that are anti-competitive, preparing for a possible litigation with the potential to remake the sport.

Advertisement

The ATP and WTA Tours, which sanction 250-, 500- and 1000-level events as well as the end-of-season Tour Finals, give players a larger share of revenue. There is some disagreement between players and officials over how much it is and the methods of accounting; some player estimates hover around 25 percent, while tour estimates can be in the range of 40 percent. Both remain short of the team equivalents in the United States.

On the ATP Tour, the nine 1000-level tournaments have a profit-sharing agreement that, in addition to prize money, gives players 50 percent of the profits under an agreed-upon accounting formula that sets aside certain revenues and subtracts certain costs, including investments the tournaments make in their facilities. The WTA does not have such an agreement. It outlines a complex prize money formula in its rule book with pages of exceptions, not based on a guaranteed share of overall tour revenues.

The tours have argued that because media rights payments constitute a lower percentage of revenues than at the Grand Slams, and because the costs of putting on tournaments are so high, a 50-50 revenue share would simply turn some tournaments into loss-making entities and make tennis unsustainable as a sport.

James Quinn, one of the antitrust lawyers hired by the PTPA, said he saw serious problems with the model, describing a structure that prevents competition from rival tournaments.

Some events outside the 52-week program of tournaments — which see players earn ranking points as well as money — have official status (the Laver Cup is sanctioned by the ATP). But the remainder, such as the Six Kings Slam in Riyadh, which debuted this year and offered record prize money of over $6million to the winner, are not sanctioned, for now providing only a peripheral form of competition to ruling bodies’ control of the sport.

Advertisement

Jannik Sinner took home the money at the inaugural Six Kings Slam in Riyadh. (Richard Pelham / Getty Images)

The Grand Slams, ATP and WTA insist this is for the best. They see themselves as caretakers of global sport trying to bring some order where chaos might otherwise reign.

Djokovic doesn’t totally disagree. He understands tennis is different from the NBA. He’s led the Player Council at the ATP, which represents male professionals, and he has seen how the sausage gets made and how complicated it is with so many tournaments of all shapes and sizes in so many countries. At the end of the day, he still thinks players deserve more than a 20-percent cut, especially since the Grand Slams don’t make the kinds of contributions to player pension plans or end-of-the-year bonus pools that the ATP does, nor do they provide the year-round support of the WTA.

“It’s not easy to get everybody in the same room and say, ‘OK, let’s agree on a certain percentage,’” he said of the leaders of tournaments.

“We want more money, (but) they maybe don’t want to give us as much money when we talk about the prize money. There are so many different layers of the prize money that you have to look into. It’s not that simple.”

(Photos: Kelly Delfina / Getty Images, Steven / PA via Getty Images; design: Dan Goldfarb)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Culture

6 New Books We Recommend This Week

Published

on

6 New Books We Recommend This Week

Our recommended books this week tilt heavily toward European culture and history, with a new history of the Vikings, a group biography of the Tudor queens’ ladies-in-waiting, a collection of letters from the Romanian-born French poet Paul Celan and a biography of the great German writer Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. We also recommend a fascinating true-crime memoir (written by the criminal in question) and, in fiction, Rebecca Kauffman’s warmhearted new novel about a complicated family. Happy reading. — Gregory Cowles

One of Europe’s most important postwar poets, Celan remains as intriguing as he is perplexing more than 50 years after his death. The autobiographical underpinnings of his work were beyond the reach of general readers until the 1990s, when the thousands of pages of Celan’s letters began to appear. The scholar Bertrand Badiou compiled the poet’s correspondence with his wife, the French graphic artist Gisèle Lestrange-Celan, and that collection is now available for the first time in English, translated by Jason Kavett.

NYRB Poets | Paperback, $28


Wilson’s biography of the German polymath Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832) approaches its subject through his masterpiece and life’s work, the verse drama “Faust” — widely considered perhaps the single greatest work of German literature, stuffed to its limits with philosophical and earthy meditations on human existence.

Bloomsbury Continuum | $35

Advertisement

Through a series of vignettes, Kauffman’s fifth novel centers on a woman determined to spend Christmas with her extended family, including her future grandchild and ex-husband, and swivels to take in the perspectives of each family member in turn.


People love the blood-soaked sagas that chronicle the deeds of Viking raiders. But Barraclough, a British historian and broadcaster, looks beyond those soap-opera stories to uncover lesser-known details of Old Norse civilization beginning in A.D. 750 or so.

Norton | $29


Fifteen years ago, Ferrell gained a dubious fame after The New York Observer identified her as the “hipster grifter” who had prowled the Brooklyn bar scene scamming unsuspecting men even as she was wanted in Utah on felony fraud charges. Now older, wiser and released from jail, Ferrell emerges in this captivating, sharp and very funny memoir to detail her path from internet notoriety to self-knowledge.

St. Martin’s | $29

Advertisement

In her lively and vivid group biography of the women who served Henry VIII’s queens, Clarke, a British author and historian, finds a compelling side entrance into the Tudor industrial complex, showing that behind all the grandeur the royal court was human-size and small.

Continue Reading

Trending