Connect with us

Culture

A king, a steel nut and a cheating storm – the strange tale of the World Conker Championships

Published

on

A king, a steel nut and a cheating storm – the strange tale of the World Conker Championships

It could have come straight from the plot of a Shakespearean tragedy.

A king is challenged to a battle by a young pretender, with victory earned only by the destruction of the other. The king emerges triumphant, but there is suspicion that he has acted nefariously in the tussle for the crown. 

Then a newcomer — a fair maiden from a foreign land — comes forth to vanquish the king. But that isn’t the end of the tale. It is only the beginning…


The story behind the controversy at this year’s World Conker Championships, which took place last weekend, has generated plenty of interest among the world’s media.

Conkers — a game where players take turns to smash a chestnut, or ‘conker’, suspended by a lace threaded through the centre using their own laced nut — has been played predominantly by children in Great Britain and Ireland since the early 1800s.

Advertisement

A match at this year’s World Conker Championships (Jacob King/PA Images via Getty Images)

It isn’t quite as quintessentially British as, say, bog snorkelling, cheese rolling or welly wanging. In fact, it is also played in parts of the United States using a buckeye nut — particularly in Ohio.

Ever since 1965, the world championships, which take place once a year, have been held in Northamptonshire in England and the current location is Southwick.

The last national census recorded the village’s population as 181 but every year, more than 250 adults and 100 children head there to battle it out in front of 2,000 spectators to be crowned conker champions and raise money for charity.

The event was started by a group of fishermen who, one day, found the weather to be unsuitable for their usual pastime so they played conkers instead and raised some money for one of their relatives who was blind. That tradition has carried on ever since, with £420,000 ($548,000) raised for charities associated with the blind and partially sighted.

It is usually a light-hearted event that has attracted contestants from all over the globe. In previous years, there has been an overall winner from Canada and this year, the children’s winners were from Germany and Latvia, the team winners were from the Netherlands and the overall winner and new Queen Conker of the event was Kelci Banschbach, a 34-year-old originally from Indianapolis, the first American to win the title. (The men’s winner faces the women’s winner in a grand final.)

Advertisement

Banschbach only arrived to work in the UK in 2022 and entered the competition to help immerse herself in the local culture, but emerged as a surprise winner at the competition this year.

However, the reason the 2024 edition has achieved such notoriety is because of the man she defeated in the overall final, David Jakins, an 82-year-old tournament veteran who also serves as a judge at the championships.


Jakins in action last weekend (Jacob King/PA Images via Getty Images)

This year was Jakins’ 46th attempt to win the men’s event and he finally achieved his dream by beating Alastair Johnson-Ferguson — a 23-year-old civil engineer from London who had travelled to experience the event with some Japanese friends — in the male final.

Jakins smashed Johnson-Ferguson’s conker with his first swing (contestants flip a coin to see who goes first), having won his semi-final in two hits. An impressive feat — especially as the harder you strike, the greater the risk of smashing your own conker.

Later, Jakins showed a fake, steel conker, painted and almost indistinguishable from a real conker, to a journalist who then informed organisers and this is where the drama ramped up a notch.

Advertisement

An investigation is being carried out with video footage being studied to see if anything untoward took place in the men’s final. Did the King Conker, after almost half a century of trying, cheat to secure his crown by using a steel conker so powerful and indestructible that he was guaranteed victory? Had the judges, who watched each bout intently to ensure the strict rules were adhered to, been hoodwinked?

“We are a very serious organisation and take conkers seriously,” says spokesman St John Burkett to The Athletic. “We want to carry out the investigation properly. I don’t think we have ever had anything like this before. So we have to make sure everything is clear and transparent.”

It isn’t unheard of for skullduggery to take place in conkers. Soaking your nut in vinegar, roasting it or even injecting resin into it are all believed to increase its solidity.


The game of conkers has been played for more than 200 years (Jacob King/PA Images via Getty Images)

“You could use a year-old conker, or my godfather, who was twice champion, used to say the best conker is one that has been passed through a pig,” Burkett says. “He used to tell a long story about how you get a conker into a pig’s mouth without the pig chewing it. Then you have to follow it around to find the conker when it comes out the other end.”

So, clearly, it is not unusual for people to go to extreme lengths to win a conker bout. But did King Conker dip into the dark arts too?

Advertisement

Rick Murphy, who has served as a judge at the competition alongside Jakins for 30 years, oversaw his semi-final win and was metres away from the action in the men’s final.

“It is very unlikely you could cheat at the world championships,” he tells The Athletic, explaining that around 3,500 conkers, which are ready for battle after September 30, are selected by the committee and prepared by volunteers, including Jakins, and then placed randomly in bags and taken to the different locations to be selected. This hugely decreases the chances of a rogue nut being prepared and selected by any perpetrator. The judges also watch intently for any sleight of hand going on. 

“A steel conker would weigh about 10 times as much,” Murphy says. “So if a player started hitting with it, the dynamics of it would be so different to a normal conker that an experienced judge would spot it straight away. It would be swinging completely differently and much faster, or the player would have to lift that conker much more to get a swing on it because of the weight. Taking into account all those things, it is very unlikely you could cheat.”

Having known Jakins — who happily wanders around the event in his decorated robes posing for photographs — for three decades, Murphy is extremely sceptical that the 82-year-old, who denies all the allegations and says he uses the steel nut to amuse children by challenging them to the impossible task of smashing it, would tarnish the game’s image.

I was in the ring for the men’s final, but I wasn’t one of the official judges,” he says. “I stood back a few feet to give spectators and the press a chance to see, rather than blocking their view and (as a result) my view was partially blocked.

Advertisement

“It all happened so quickly, literally the first swing and there were bits of conker flying. Now, that isn’t as rare as people may think. My own conker was broken in the first round by the first strike. It was like: ‘Gosh, what happened? Is it over already?’.”

But Murphy had no suspicions.

“I’ll tell you why,” he adds. “I was the umpire for the semi-final and it was a similar thing: two strikes. Again, I saw him draw the conker randomly. I saw how the conker moved. I didn’t see him put his hand into his pocket, so I was quite convinced that there was nothing odd going on.

“I know David quite well and, although he would be keen to fulfil his ambition to win the competition, I’m sure he wouldn’t cheat to do it.”


These conkers were all used at the championships (Jacob King/PA Images via Getty Images)

This is where the tale gets a little dark, as the attention since the event, which has included television and radio coverage and reports in the written media, has caused some upset — and not just to Jakins, who declined to comment when contacted by The Athletic.

Advertisement

Initial reports suggested that Johnson-Ferguson had complained to the organisers after the event, leading the chairman Jim Packer to brand him a “sore loser”. However, the men’s runner-up now seems to have calmed down a little.

“I hadn’t played since I was 10 and only went along for a laugh,” Johnson-Ferguson tells The Athletic. “It was completely fair and I had no problem with anything.

“I did see him (Jakins) put the conker in one pocket and pick out another. That happened, but he was probably just keeping his winning conker as a souvenir. It was a fun day and there was a great atmosphere. I enjoyed it but it has been tainted by what has happened since.”

“To be called a sore loser by the chairman wasn’t nice. I thought it was a lighthearted story, and it is in general, but no one likes to have their name dragged through the mud in the national news. If you had asked me the day after whether I would go back again, I would have said yes, but I am not sure now.”

The tale is not yet over. At the time of the publication of this article, the investigation was still ongoing. But for now, the king keeps his crown.

Advertisement

But regardless of what happens over the next few days, Jakins’ steel nut will live long in conker infamy.

(Top image: Artwork by Meech Robinson; Photos from Getty Images)

Culture

Revisiting Jane Austen’s Cultural Impact for Her 250th Birthday

Published

on

Revisiting Jane Austen’s Cultural Impact for Her 250th Birthday

On Dec. 16, 1775, a girl was born in Steventon, England — the seventh of eight children — to a clergyman and his wife. She was an avid reader, never married and died in 1817, at the age of 41. But in just those few decades, Jane Austen changed the world.

Her novels have had an outsize influence in the centuries since her death. Not only are the books themselves beloved — as sharply observed portraits of British society, revolutionary narrative projects and deliciously satisfying romances — but the stories she created have so permeated culture that people around the world care deeply about Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy, even if they’ve never actually read “Pride and Prejudice.”

Advertisement

With her 250th birthday this year, the Austen Industrial Complex has kicked into high gear with festivals, parades, museum exhibits, concerts and all manner of merch, ranging from the classily apt to the flamboyantly absurd. The words “Jane mania” have been used; so has “exh-Aust-ion.”

How to capture this brief life, and the blazing impact that has spread across the globe in her wake? Without further ado: a mere sampling of the wealth, wonder and weirdness Austen has brought to our lives. After all, your semiquincentennial doesn’t come around every day.

Advertisement

By ‘A Lady’

Jane Austen’s House, Chawton, England

Advertisement

Austen published just four novels in her lifetime: “Sense and Sensibility” (1811), “Pride and Prejudice” (1813), “Mansfield Park” (1814) and “Emma” (1815). All of them were published anonymously, with the author credited simply as “A Lady.” (If you’re in New York, you can see this first edition for yourself at the Grolier Club through Feb. 14.)

Where the Magic Happened

Advertisement

Janice Chung for The New York Times

Placed near a window for light, this diminutive walnut table was, according to family lore, where the author did much of her writing. It is now in the possession of the Jane Austen Society.

Advertisement

An Iconic Accessory

Advertisement

Jane Austen’s House, Chawton, England

Few of Austen’s personal artifacts remain, contributing to the author’s mystique. One of them is this turquoise ring, which passed to her sister-in-law and then her niece after her death. In 2012, the ring was put up for auction and bought by the “American Idol” champion Kelly Clarkson. This caused quite a stir in England; British officials were loath to let such an important cultural artifact leave the country’s borders. Jane Austen’s House, the museum now based in the writer’s Hampshire home, launched a crowdfunding campaign to Bring the Ring Home and bought the piece from Clarkson. The real ring now lives at the museum; the singer has a replica.

Austen Onscreen

Advertisement

Since 1940, when Austen had a bit of a moment and Greer Garson and Laurence Olivier starred in MGM’s rather liberally reinterpreted “Pride and Prejudice,” there have been more than 20 international adaptations of Austen’s work made for film and TV (to say nothing of radio). From the sublime (Emma Thompson’s Oscar-winning “Sense and Sensibility”) to the ridiculous (the wholly gratuitous 2022 remake of “Persuasion”), the high waists, flickering firelight and double weddings continue to provide an endless stream of debate fodder — and work for a queen’s regiment of British stars.

Jane Goes X-Rated

Advertisement

Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

The rumors are true: XXX Austen is a thing. “Jane Austen Kama Sutra,” “Pride and Promiscuity: The Lost Sex Scenes of Jane Austen” and enough slash fic and amateur porn to fill Bath’s Assembly Rooms are just the start. Purists may never recover.

Advertisement

A Lady Unmasked

Advertisement

Jane Austen’s House, Chawton, England

Austen’s final two completed novels, “Northanger Abbey” and “Persuasion,” were published after her death. Her brother Henry, who oversaw their publication, took the opportunity to give his sister the recognition he felt she deserved, revealing the true identity of the “Lady” behind “Pride and Prejudice,” “Emma,” etc. in a biographical note. “The following pages are the production of a pen which has already contributed in no small degree to the entertainment of the public,” he wrote, extolling his sister’s imagination, good humor and love of dancing. Still, “no accumulation of fame would have induced her, had she lived, to affix her name to any productions of her pen.”

Wearable Tributes

Advertisement

Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

Advertisement

It is a truth universally acknowledged that a Jane Austen fan wants to find other Jane Austen fans, and what better way to advertise your membership in that all-inclusive club than with a bit of merch — from the subtle and classy to the gloriously obscene.

The Austen Literary Universe

Advertisement

Elizabeth Renstrom for The New York Times

On the page, there is no end to the adventures Austen and her characters have been on. There are Jane Austen mysteries, Jane Austen vampire series, Jane Austen fantasy adventures, Jane Austen Y.A. novels and, of course, Jane Austen romances, which transpose her plots to a remote Maine inn, a Greenwich Village penthouse and the Bay Area Indian American community, to name just a few. You can read about Austen-inspired zombie hunters, time-traveling hockey players, Long Island matchmakers and reality TV stars, or imagine further adventures for some of your favorite characters. (Even the obsequious Mr. Collins gets his day in the sun.)

Advertisement

A Botanical Homage

Created in 2017 to mark the 200th anniversary of Austen’s death, the “Jane Austen” rose is characterized by its intense orange color and light, sweet perfume. It is bushy, healthy and easy to grow.

Advertisement

Aunt Jane

Advertisement

Jane Austen’s House, Chawton, England

Hoping to cement his beloved aunt’s legacy, Austen’s nephew James Edward Austen-Leigh published this biography — a rather rosy portrait based on interviews with family members — five decades after her death. The book is notable not only as the source (biased though it may be) of many of the scant facts we know about her life, but also for the watercolor portrait by James Andrews that serves as its frontispiece. Based on a sketch by Cassandra, this depiction of Jane is softer and far more winsome than the original: Whether that is due to a lack of skill on her sister’s part or overly enthusiastic artistic license on Andrews’s, this is the version of Austen most familiar to people today.

Cultural Currency

Advertisement

Steve Parsons/Associated Press

Advertisement

In 2017, the Bank of England released a new 10-pound note featuring Andrews’s portrait of Austen, as well as a line from “Pride and Prejudice”: “I declare after all there is no enjoyment like reading!” Austen is the third woman — other than the queen — to be featured on British currency, and the only one currently in circulation.

In the Trenches

Advertisement

During World War I and World War II, British soldiers were given copies of Austen’s works. In his 1924 story “The Janeites,” Rudyard Kipling invoked the grotesque contrasts — and the strange comfort — to be found in escaping to Austen’s well-ordered world amid the horrors of trench warfare. As one character observes, “There’s no one to touch Jane when you’re in a tight place.”

Baby Janes

Advertisement

Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

You’re never too young to learn to love Austen — or that one’s good opinion, once lost, may be lost forever.

Advertisement

The Austen Industrial Complex

Advertisement

Elizabeth Renstrom for The New York Times

Maybe you’ve not so much as seen a Jane Austen meme, let alone read one of her novels. No matter! Need a Jane Austen finger puppet? Lego? Magnetic poetry set? Lingerie? Nameplate necklace? Plush book pillow? License plate frame? Bath bomb? Socks? Dog sweater? Whiskey glass? Tarot deck? Of course you do! And you’re in luck: What a time to be alive.

Around the Globe

Advertisement

Goucher College Special Collections & Archives, Alberta H. and Henry G. Burke Collection; via The Morgan Library & Museum

Advertisement

Austen’s novels have been translated into more than 40 languages, including Polish, Finnish, Chinese and Farsi. There are active chapters of the Jane Austen Society, her 21st-century fan club, throughout the world.

Playable Persuasions

Advertisement

Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

In Austen’s era, no afternoon tea was complete without a rousing round of whist, a trick-taking card game played in two teams of two. But should you not be up on your Regency amusements, you can find plenty of contemporary puzzles and games with which to fill a few pleasant hours, whether you’re piecing together her most beloved characters or using your cunning and wiles to land your very own Mr. Darcy.

Advertisement

#SoJaneAusten

The wild power of the internet means that many Austen moments have taken on lives of their own, from Colin Firth’s sopping wet shirt and Matthew Macfadyen’s flexing hand to Mr. Collins’s ode to superlative spuds and Mr. Knightley’s dramatic floor flop. The memes are fun, yes, but they also speak to the universality of Austen’s writing: More than two centuries after her books were published, the characters and stories she created are as relatable as ever.

Bonnets Fit for a Bennett

Advertisement

Peter Flude for The New York Times

Advertisement

For this summer’s Grand Regency Costumed Promenade in Bath, England — as well as the myriad picnics, balls, house parties, dinners, luncheons, teas and fetes that marked the anniversary — seamstresses, milliners, mantua makers and costume warehouses did a brisk business, attiring the faithful in authentic Regency finery. And that’s a commitment: A bespoke, historically accurate bonnet can easily run to hundreds of dollars.

Most Ardently, Jane

Advertisement

The Morgan Library & Museum

Austen was prolific correspondent, believed to have written thousands of letters in her lifetime, many to her sister, Cassandra. But in an act that has frustrated biographers for centuries, upon Jane’s death, Cassandra protected her sister’s privacy — and reputation? — by burning almost all of them, leaving only about 160 intact, many heavily redacted. But what survives is filled with pithy one-liners. To wit: “I do not want people to be very agreeable, as it saves me the trouble of liking them a great deal.”

Advertisement

Stage and Sensibility

Austen’s works have been adapted numerous times for the stage. Some plays (and musicals) hew closely to the original text, while others — such as Emily Breeze’s comedic riff on “Pride and Prejudice,” “Are the Bennet Girls OK?”, which is running at New York City’s West End Theater through Dec. 21 — use creative license to explore ideas of gender, romance and rage through a contemporary lens.

Advertisement

Austen 101

Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

Advertisement

Austen remains a reliable fount of academic scholarship; recent conference papers have focused on the author’s enduring global reach, the work’s relationship to modern intersectionality, digital humanities and “Jane Austen on the Cheap.” And as one professor told our colleague Sarah Lyall of the Austen amateur scholarship hive, “Woe betide the academic who doesn’t take them seriously.”

W.W.J.D.

Advertisement

Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

When facing problems — of etiquette, romance, domestic or professional turmoil — sometimes the only thing to do is ask: What would Jane do?

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Culture

I Think This Poem Is Kind of Into You

Published

on

I Think This Poem Is Kind of Into You

Advertisement

A famous poet once observed that it is difficult to get the news from poems. The weather is a different story. April showers, summer sunshine and — maybe especially — the chill of winter provide an endless supply of moods and metaphors. Poets like to practice a double meteorology, looking out at the water and up at the sky for evidence of interior conditions of feeling.

The inner and outer forecasts don’t always match up. This short poem by Louise Glück starts out cold and stays that way for most of its 11 lines.

And then it bursts into flame.

Advertisement

“Early December in Croton-on-Hudson” comes from Glück’s debut collection, “Firstborn,” which was published in 1968. She wrote the poems in it between the ages of 18 and 23, but they bear many of the hallmarks of her mature style, including an approach to personal matters — sex, love, illness, family life — that is at once uncompromising and elusive. She doesn’t flinch. She also doesn’t explain.

Here, for example, Glück assembles fragments of experience that imply — but also obscure — a larger narrative. It’s almost as if a short story, or even a novel, had been smashed like a glass Christmas ornament, leaving the reader to infer the sphere from the shards.

Advertisement

We know there was a couple with a flat tire, and that a year later at least one of them still has feelings for the other. It’s hard not to wonder if they’re still together, or where they were going with those Christmas presents.

To some extent, those questions can be addressed with the help of biographical clues. The version of “Early December in Croton-on-Hudson” that appeared in The Atlantic in 1967 was dedicated to Charles Hertz, a Columbia University graduate student who was Glück’s first husband. They divorced a few years later. Glück, who died in 2023, was never shy about putting her life into her work.

Advertisement

Louise Glück in 1975.

Gerard Malanga

Advertisement

But the poem we are reading now is not just the record of a passion that has long since cooled. More than 50 years after “Firstborn,” on the occasion of receiving the Nobel Prize for literature, Glück celebrated the “intimate, seductive, often furtive or clandestine” relations between poets and their readers. Recalling her childhood discovery of William Blake and Emily Dickinson, she declared her lifelong ardor for “poems to which the listener or reader makes an essential contribution, as recipient of a confidence or an outcry, sometimes as co-conspirator.”

That’s the kind of poem she wrote.

Advertisement

“Confidence” can have two meanings, both of which apply to “Early December in Croton-on-Hudson.” Reading it, you are privy to a secret, something meant for your ears only. You are also in the presence of an assertive, self-possessed voice.

Where there is power, there’s also risk. To give voice to desire — to whisper or cry “I want you” — is to issue a challenge and admit vulnerability. It’s a declaration of conquest and a promise of surrender.

What happens next? That’s up to you.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Culture

Can You Identify Where the Winter Scenes in These Novels Took Place?

Published

on

Can You Identify Where the Winter Scenes in These Novels Took Place?

Cold weather can serve as a plot point or emphasize the mood of a scene, and this week’s literary geography quiz highlights the locations of recent novels that work winter conditions right into the story. Even if you aren’t familiar with the book, the questions offer an additional hint about the setting. To play, just make your selection in the multiple-choice list and the correct answer will be revealed. At the end of the quiz, you’ll find links to the books if you’d like to do further reading.

Continue Reading

Trending