Crypto
How Republicans Fell in Love With Crypto
If you have to convince somebody that something is money, it almost certainly isn’t. But there has been a marked shift in the world of digital currencies and crypto-denominated digital assets: their advocates seem to have long moved on from trying to convince us of their new and radical alternative to what they semiderisively (and semiaccurately) refer to as “fiat” currency.
The flaws in this story have always been apparent. For one, there has never been anything particularly “new” or “radical” about cryptocurrencies, the reactionary fantasy of apolitical money having a long and storied history. Meanwhile, the medium-of-exchange status of the “political” fiat currencies (which are more accurately described not as fiat- but as credit-based currencies, backed up by countless legal obligations to pay), particularly that of the key currencies (the dollar, the yen, the pound sterling, and the euro), has never been less in question.
For Bitcoin and its numerous equivalents, the opposite has become abundantly clear. They are not reliable media of exchange outside the confines of certain Central American dictatorships; not hedges against inflation; and due to changes in their value becoming highly correlated with conventional and volatile financial assets like stocks (and with erratic social media activity of billionaires), decidedly not reliable stores of value (rather, “three stocks in a trench coat”). The ancillary argument, usually evoked by those who concede these flaws, that the attendant technologies (notably the distributed ledger system known as “blockchain,” a glorified version of Google Docs or Excel) will transform our relationship with money, has also faded into the background, a process no doubt hastened by mounting consternation over the exorbitant environmental damages associated with crypto “mining.”
What crypto has instead revealed itself to be is a naked instrument of financial speculation and fraud, and a highly lucrative one. Far from removing politics from money and decentralizing power at the expense of oligarchic influence, crypto has become a vector of power and influence, not just for financial market participants — from professional traders and portfolio managers to the legions of insufferable crypto bros who flaunt their gains on the streets of Miami and Los Angeles — but for powerful actors in the tech industry wishing to gain a purchase on political decision-making. As a result, it has become an important arena of elite contestation. The current electoral campaign in the United States is a perfect showcase of this evolution.
Both the Democratic and Republican candidates are intimately connected to the California-based tech industry. But the incumbent Democrats have (too little, too late, perhaps) taken the first steps in introducing regulatory measures akin to those that exist in the financial industry. While the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), currently staffed by Joe Biden pick Gary Gensler, has over the last decade proven notoriously toothless in its job of curtailing the (often fraudulent) excesses of high finance, Gensler’s pugnaciousness and the specter of any infringement of Silicon Valley players’ ability to continue making enormous gains in the poorly regulated crypto world has mobilized many key actors behind Donald Trump, despite the former president’s initial disparaging remarks about Bitcoin. The catalyst for the process seems to have been the downfall of the cryptocurrency exchange and hedge fund FTX (whose former CEO, Sam Bankman-Fried, was recently sentenced to twenty-five years in prison) and the deployment of congressional and regulatory resources (led by Gensler and Elizabeth Warren) that brought it about.
The fear of a concerted regulatory response by a new Democratic administration isn’t the only factor mobilizing this particular contingent of the Californian right. As Lily Lynch recently pointed out in the New Statesman, the very tech barons who are balking at government interference in crypto also view Kamala Harris as representative of a “competency crisis” caused by the Democratic elite’s embrace of identity politics and its supposed manifestation in the workplace, “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) policies, of which Harris is somehow said to have been the beneficiary.
The magnitude of these events is becoming all too clear. The new partisan dynamic in the crypto world has brought several prominent right-wing tech billionaires, with their ample resources pouring into newly created super PACs, the primary vehicles for supporting political campaigns in the United States, into the fray. Among this strange cast of characters are prominent tech venture capitalists and doyens of the neo-right Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen, investors and entrepreneurs such as David Sacks, Cathie Wood, and Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, and activist hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, as well as Elon Musk.
Trump’s volte-face on the issue has not just subsumed their concerns into the usual pseudo-libertarian Republican pabulum (with the Republican National Committee platform, under the guise of “championing innovation,” speaking of “the right to mine Bitcoin” and “the right to self-custody [over] digital assets” and to “transact free from government surveillance and control”) but has automatically entangled Bitcoin in national security matters. Among the many issues touched on in his unsettling interview in Bloomberg, Trump proclaimed that he would oppose any Democratic attempts to regulate the industry on account of not wanting China to gain an advantage “in this sphere.” The fact that there is little in the “technology” of digital currencies that confers any advantage in the grand geopolitical scheme of things, or the fact that China has pioneered cracking down harshly on unfettered speculation in crypto, matters neither to Trump nor to the average, low-information US voter.
American elections being awash with money is far from new. In fact, the system is set up to be particularly susceptible to the influence of well-funded and highly motivated special interest groups. And while the surge of the crypto-tech right is a new factor, donations can only take a campaign so far — especially when the opposing side is equally well funded by, among others, large tech firms.
In fact, the dominance of right-wing tech billionaires in the Trump campaign might prove to be a liability. This becomes clearer if we assume that Trump’s pick for vice president, Ohio senator J. D. Vance, a mentee of Peter Thiel, was motivated less by generic culture war considerations (the author of Hillbilly Elegy being a veteran of that theater) than by Trump’s desire to placate and win over the very crypto-adjacent Silicon Valley types that are now inundating him with money.
While the windfall will surely allow for an extensive ad campaign (though Trump’s relatively bric-a-brac but successful media efforts in 2016 proved enough), the excitement on the Right that initially greeted Vance’s ascendancy has recently been dampened. The Democratic campaign to paint the new right-wing culture warriors as “weird” has been aided not just by some of rumored couch aficionado Vance’s public appearances but also by the simple fact that the dramatis personae in the Silicon Valley story are also undeniably and deeply weird themselves.
Not only does their monomaniacal preoccupation with ever more arcane culture war issues fail to sufficiently resonate beyond the confines of podcasts and social media, the eccentricities of the likes of Musk (with his erratic and seemingly drug- and divorce-induced purchase and mismanagement of Twitter, now X), Thiel (with his sweaty, awkward demeanor onstage not helped by his well-established interest in recruiting young Stanford students to rejuvenate him with their blood), and Ackman (with his extremely public meltdown over his Israeli wife’s academic fraud and student protests over Gaza) now seem inextricable from Vance and his bumbling efforts to maintain composure.
Vance’s own attempt to reignite the culture wars has been dampened by the Harris campaign’s choice not to run on identity issues (thus rendering the “woke” or “DEI hire” talking points leveled against the former prosecutor Harris impotent) and to choose as her running mate Minnesota governor Tim Walz, whose confident “folksy-yet-progressive white guy” antics further highlight Vance’s faux down-to-earth-ness and anti-elitism.
It is of course far too early to know whether the Republicans are in the process of regrouping or painting themselves into a corner. Contributions from Thiel et al. will undeniably help to pad the pockets of the Trump campaign. But whether this will be an asset or not is unclear — the former president succeeded in 2016 despite being vastly outspent by Hillary Clinton. Undeniably, Trump’s embrace of the most regressive section of the tech industry is a gamble. If it pays off, it will bring one of most venal and unproductive sectors of American capitalism closer to power; but if it fails, it might provide Democrats with a chance to put an even tighter regulatory noose around tech’s neck. Whether they will take that chance is an open question.
Crypto
Chainalysis Details ‘Shadow Crypto Economy’ Exposure as Grinex Suspends Operations
Key Takeaways:
- Chainalysis flags Grinex swaps as inconsistent with typical law enforcement seizures.
- Tron-based conversions show illicit actors avoiding stablecoin issuer intervention.
- Grinex activity does not clearly align with patterns of a conventional external hack.
Grinex Shutdown Raises Questions About Crypto Laundering Tactics
Sanctions pressure continues to test the resilience of crypto networks tied to restricted financial activity. Blockchain intelligence firm Chainalysis on April 17 examined Grinex after the sanctioned exchange suspended operations. The review described the shutdown as a new stress point for infrastructure tied to sanctions evasion.
Grinex claimed a cyberattack cost about 1 billion rubles, or $13.7 million, and published the source and destination addresses involved. Chainalysis then assessed the transfers using on-chain data rather than relying on the exchange’s narrative. The analysis found that the stolen assets were mainly a fiat-backed stablecoin before being moved through a Tron-based decentralized exchange into TRX.
“In the case of the alleged Grinex hack, the stablecoin funds were quickly swapped for a non-freezable token, thereby avoiding the risk of having the stablecoins frozen by the issuer,” the blockchain analytics firm stated, adding:
“This frantic swapping from stablecoins to more decentralized tokens is a hallmark tactic of cybercriminals and illicit actors attempting to launder funds before a centralized freeze can be executed.”
Chainalysis argued that this behavior does not fit a typical Western law enforcement seizure because authorities can request freezes from centralized stablecoin issuers. The firm instead said the rapid conversion raises questions about whether the activity aligns with a conventional external hack.
Shadow Crypto Economy Shows Deep Interconnected Structure
Those conclusions rest on more than the attack claim alone. Chainalysis noted that the decentralized exchange used in the swap had previously served Garantex, the sanctioned predecessor to Grinex, as a liquidity source for hot wallets. That detail is notable because Chainalysis has already described Grinex as the direct successor to Garantex after international enforcement disrupted the earlier platform. The company also tied Grinex to A7A5, a ruble-backed token issued by sanctioned Kyrgyzstani company Old Vector.
According to the analysis, A7A5 was built for a narrow Russia-linked payments ecosystem aligned with cross-border settlement needs under sanctions pressure. Chainalysis added that the exfiltrated funds were still sitting in a single address at publication time, leaving a live trail for future forensic review.
The broader takeaway was less about one theft than about the financial system surrounding it. Chainalysis observed that the episode is the latest disruption inside a “shadow crypto economy.” That phrase captured the firm’s larger conclusion that Grinex, Garantex, A7A5, and related services formed an interlinked network designed to keep value moving despite sanctions. Chainalysis further disclosed that it labeled the relevant addresses in its products to help customers identify exposure as the funds move downstream. Even without final attribution, the firm made clear that Grinex’s suspension damages a key channel within that sanctioned ecosystem.
Crypto
Current price of Bitcoin for April 17, 2026 | Fortune
At 8:45 a.m. Eastern Time today, the market price for a single Bitcoin (BTC) is $75,746.90. That’s a $960.86 jump from where it was trading yesterday morning and about $9,200 lower than it was one year ago.
What is Bitcoin?
Bitcoin is widely recognized as the pioneering cryptocurrency and continues to hold the top spot in terms of name recognition and market size. Its market capitalization is roughly $1.33 trillion, putting it far ahead of second-place Ethereum with about $233 billion in market cap.
At a basic level, Bitcoin functions as a decentralized digital currency. Instead of relying on a central authority like a bank or government, it runs on a peer-to-peer network of computers. This design lets people transfer value straight to others without using a traditional financial intermediary.
Many investors turn to Bitcoin as a potential hedge against inflation in the U.S. dollar or as a way to branch out beyond conventional investments. Over the past decade, it has posted stunning gains, often outperforming major stock indexes, which has played a big role in its popularity.
At the same time, Bitcoin shares a key trait with other cryptocurrencies—it can be extremely volatile, with frequent and sometimes dramatic price changes.
Bitcoin price history
Since it was introduced in 2009, Bitcoin has been highly volatile and often headline-grabbing. One early milestone in its history involves developer Laszlo Hanyecz, who famously spent 10,000 Bitcoins on pizza. Today, those coins would be valued at more than 668 million dollars.
Over the last decade or so, Bitcoin’s price has climbed more than 15,000%. This tremendous growth comes with a trade-off, as cryptocurrencies are known for their unpredictability. Bitcoin has undergone severe pullbacks—sometimes dropping tens of thousands of dollars within months—as well as dramatic recoveries. At the close of 2025, it was trading roughly 30% below the all-time high it hit that very October.
What affects Bitcoin’s price?
Several different dynamics can move Bitcoin’s price up or down, including:
- Investor speculation: Like many speculative assets, Bitcoin’s short-term price is heavily driven by trader psychology and buzz. In the near term, prices usually reflect investor beliefs and trading activity more than anything else.
- Adoption by major companies: When large corporations embrace Bitcoin or broader crypto technology, it can help support further growth. For example, Bitcoin’s price rose after companies such as Tesla and Ferrari announced plans to accept Bitcoin as a payment option.
- Economy: Bitcoin doesn’t track inflation figures or central bank decisions in the same way many traditional investments do. Still, it often benefits when the U.S. economy is strong, because people who feel financially secure may be more willing to allocate money to alternative assets that are a bit riskier—like crypto.
- Regulatory developments: As a relatively young asset class, cryptocurrency is still in the process of being fully regulated. New rules or enforcement actions can either instill confidence or create fear. Both cases can significantly affect Bitcoin’s price.
How to buy and invest in Bitcoin
If you’ve decided to invest in Bitcoin, there are multiple ways to do it. Here are some of the main options.
Buy Bitcoin on a cryptocurrency exchange
The most straightforward route is to buy Bitcoin directly. You set up an account with a crypto exchange, connect it to your bank, and then use your deposited cash to buy Bitcoin.
Invest in Bitcoin ETFs
For those who prefer a more traditional investment vehicle, Bitcoin exchange-traded funds are an alternative. A Bitcoin ETF holds Bitcoin on behalf of its shareholders, and its shares trade on standard stock exchanges. This option lets you skip the process of managing your own crypto wallet and can reduce the risk of losing access to your funds because of a password mistake or wallet issue.
Buy crypto stocks
Investors who don’t want to buy Bitcoin directly can also consider stocks of companies in the crypto space. These might include tech companies that support blockchain technology, public crypto exchanges, even payment processors. Because these companies may earn revenue from Bitcoin-related activity, their share prices can offer indirect exposure to Bitcoin’s performance.
Open a Bitcoin IRA
For retirement-focused investing, a Bitcoin IRA is another great option. Like a standard IRA, it’s a tax-advantaged account with similar contribution limits and tax rules, but it lets you allocate some of your retirement savings to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as alternative investments.
Bitcoin vs. other cryptocurrencies
Bitcoin might be the best-known name in crypto, but it is not your only choice. When weighing where to put your money, you may want to compare it with a few other major coins.
- Ethereum: Ethereum is currently the second-largest cryptocurrency by market cap. Unlike Bitcoin, which was designed mainly as a form of money, Ethereum was built as a decentralized computing platform and is widely used for running applications and smart contracts.
- Tether: Tether is a stablecoin, meaning that its value is directly tied to another asset—in this instance, the U.S. dollar. Its peg typically keeps price movements smaller than Bitcoin’s, but that also means there’s less opportunity for outsized growth.
- XRP: XRP is a digital asset created to make sending money across borders faster and cheaper, focusing specifically on international transfers with low transaction costs.
Crypto coverage from Fortune
See our newsroom’s recent coverage of what’s been happening on the cryptocurrency scene:
Is it a good time to invest in Bitcoin?
When compared with long-standing blue-chip names such as Procter & Gamble or Walmart, Bitcoin is still a newcomer. That makes predicting its long-term behavior challenging. But its recent history has been impressive. As more companies start accepting Bitcoin as a payment method, its price may get a further boost, and as the asset matures, it might eventually see somewhat smoother price movements.
However, Bitcoin should not be treated as a sure bet. It’s wise to invest only money you can afford to have tied up and to ensure your broader portfolio is diversified, so other investments can help offset Bitcoin’s volatility.
For most people, Bitcoin is better viewed as a long-term, higher-risk holding than as a quick trade. It is not ideal for investors who are uncomfortable watching large price swings. But if you plan to hold it for years and keep it as a piece of a balanced portfolio, investing in Bitcoin could make sense for a portion of your overall strategy.
Frequently asked questions
How much will Bitcoin be worth in 2030?
While the answer is obviously unknowable, crypto experts are generally optimistic about the short-term success of Bitcoin. Some models price it at more than $700,000 by 2030, with conservative estimates closer to $300,000.
What is Bitcoin’s all-time high price?
As of this writing, Bitcoin reached its highest price ever on Oct. 6, 2025, pricing at a whopping $126,198.07.
Can you buy a fraction of a Bitcoin?
Yes, you can buy a fraction of a Bitcoin. Most cryptocurrency exchanges offer fractional investing, meaning you can buy portions of crypto coins. Thanks to fractional investing, you can invest in Bitcoin with as little as a few dollars.
How do I start investing in Bitcoin as a beginner?
If you want to invest directly in Bitcoin by owning the currency, you’ll typically open an account with a cryptocurrency exchange. Once the account is created, you can transfer money to your crypto account from your bank and place an order for Bitcoin and other tokens or coins. You can also indirectly invest in Bitcoin via an ETF or a business that uses Bitcoin.
What can you buy with Bitcoin?
You can use your Bitcoin holdings in several ways, from selling for cash to trading it for other coins. In some cases, you can also pay for purchases, such as with Tesla and Microsoft.
Does Bitcoin outperform the stock market?
Bitcoin has well outperformed the stock market since its launch, but its extreme volatility makes it far less than a guarantee to be a better investment than stocks.
Crypto
Anthropic Adds ID Verification to Claude for Select AI Users
Key Takeaways:
- Anthropic added ID checks for Claude users in April 2026, gating some features.
- Persona handles verification; Anthropic says no ID images are stored on its systems.
- OpenAI and Google Gemini lack similar rules, raising competition questions.
Anthropic Introduces Government ID Verification for Some Claude Users
The change appeared in a help center update published during the week of April 14–16, 2026, and is not applied across all users. Instead, prompts surface in specific cases tied to higher-tier plans, advanced capabilities, or internal safety reviews.
According to Anthropic, the goal is to limit abuse, enforce platform rules, and meet legal obligations. The company frames the rollout as part of routine integrity checks rather than a universal onboarding requirement.
Users who encounter the prompt must provide a physical, government-issued photo ID and complete a live selfie scan. Anthropic details that the process typically takes less than five minutes and requires a camera-enabled device.
Accepted documents include passports, driver’s licenses, and national ID cards. Digital copies, screenshots, or temporary paper IDs are rejected, along with non-government credentials such as student or employee cards.
The verification workflow is handled by Persona, which processes ID data on Anthropic’s behalf. Anthropic says it does not store the underlying ID images on its own systems. Instead, Persona retains the data under contractual limits, while Anthropic maintains access to verification results when needed for account review or appeals.
The company states that all data is encrypted and used only for identity confirmation, fraud prevention, and compliance. Anthropic also says identity data is not used to train its AI models and is not shared for marketing purposes. Disclosure is limited to legal requirements.
The move reflects growing pressure on AI platforms to address misuse, including fraud and impersonation. Anthropic has also cited age restrictions, with some under-18 accounts reportedly suspended pending verification.
Reaction from users has been mostly unfavorable. “Claude now requires government ID verification (via Persona) before subscription,” one critic wrote. “ChatGPT doesn’t. Gemini doesn’t. Anthropic just handed their competitors a gift,” the X account added. On Reddit, one person stated:
“Goofy. Cannot wait till we have capable off-line LLMs that doesn’t cost a fortune to run.”
The co-founder of the media brand Bankless, Ryan Sean Adams, also shared his view. “AI KYC is here. New claude subscribers asked for gov ID & photo,” Adams wrote. “Not even a regulatory requirement – Anthropic just doing it because they want to. But regulatory is coming Next up will be laws: No AI without gov-issued ID All AI use tracked to individual – no private AI.”
The backlash has been amplified by comparisons to competitors. Platforms like OpenAI and Google’s Gemini do not currently require government ID verification for standard chatbot use. Others competitors, like Venice AI, are private alongside the use of local models.
That difference has led some users to question whether stricter controls could push activity toward less restrictive services. Others argue the shift signals a broader move toward KYC-style checks in consumer AI.
For now, the system remains targeted rather than universal. But its presence suggests identity verification may become a more common layer as AI platforms expand access to more capable tools.
-
Ohio4 days ago‘Little Rascals’ star Bug Hall arrested in Ohio
-
Arkansas1 week agoArkansas TV meteorologist Melinda Mayo retires after nearly four decades on air
-
Politics4 days agoDem fundraising giant in the hot seat as GOP lawmakers demand answers over dodged subpoena
-
Science4 days ago‘Dr. Pimple Popper’ Sandra Lee had a stroke last fall. Here’s how the TV doc is bouncing back
-
Health1 week agoWoman discovers missing nose ring traveled to her lungs, causing month-long cough
-
Politics7 days agoTrump blasts Spanberger ahead of Virginia meetings, says state faces tax base exodus like New York, California
-
San Francisco, CA6 days agoPresident Trump terminates Presidio Trust
-
Technology1 week agoIs the ‘Holy Grail of batteries’ finally ready to bless us with its presence?