Iranians were able to access more than 1,500 Binance accounts last year, and $1.7 billion was transferred from two of them to terrorist proxies, The New York Times reported Monday.
Crypto
Cryptocurrency laws and regulations
Overview of regulations, how they’re regulated, key challenges, and more resources for legal professionals
Legal terms · Securities law · Cryptocurrency laws
The expansion of virtual currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum has put U.S. regulators in a dilemma between encouraging innovation and safeguarding investors.
The evolution of cryptocurrency is primarily due to the rise in technology worldwide. It has pushed financial boundaries, leaving with the possibility that cryptocurrencies may become the central element of the global economy.
The significance and impact of the use of cryptocurrency in the U.S. highlights the need to regulate it. However, there is a challenge in establishing a clear policy framework. With the digital revolution taking place through cryptocurrency, the state and federal governments are trying to determine how to define their role in regulating this new asset class in the best way possible.
Jump to ↓
What is cryptocurrency?
What is cryptocurrency regulation?
How is cryptocurrency regulated?
State regulations
International Standard-Setting Bodies
Challenges in the US crypto regulation
CoCounsel
Bringing together generative AI, trusted content, and expert insights for securities regulations
Meet your AI assistant ↗
What is cryptocurrency?
Cryptocurrency is a type of digital money that is a decentralized digital asset designed as a medium of exchange, utilizing cryptographic protocols to regulate the creation of new units. It exists only online and is not controlled by any government, central bank, or authority.
A digital or virtual currency that is not issued by any central authority, is designed to function as a medium of exchange, and uses encryption technology to regulate the generation of units of currency, to verify fund transfers, and to prevent counterfeiting.
(12th ed. 2024)
Cryptocurrency uses a secure technology called cryptography to keep transactions safe and verify fund transfers to prevent fraud. It operates on a decentralized system and transactions are recorded on a public ledger called blockchain. The regulatory treatment of cryptocurrency varies across jurisdictions, with legal considerations encompassing anti-money laundering compliance, securities laws, taxation, and consumer protection frameworks.
What is cryptocurrency regulation?
Crypto regulations are the legal rules and guidelines that are present and issued by governments to shape how digital assets such as virtual currency operate. These laws have varied approaches across nations.
In the U.S., there are various states wherein some are friendly towards market participants embracing crypto with clear regulations, while others ban it outright.
Around 60 percent of U.S. citizens lack confidence in cryptocurrency trading or investment, considering the existing systems to be unreliable or unsafe. One primary reason for this distrust may be the absence of a single, consistent set of laws to regulate cryptocurrencies.
The existing regulations range from covering everything about how cryptocurrencies are to be created and traded to how they interact with traditional financial systems. Well-defined rules can help the crypto market in the following ways:
- Help in protecting investors from scams and market manipulation
- Ensure that there is transparency in the transaction, along with accurate information
- Help prevent illegal activities like money laundering, fraud, misleading information, etc
- Clarify the tax rules that apply to digital currencies
- Encourages market participation and confidence in the investors while encouraging blockchain innovation
- Regulates the risks that are or may be associated with the transactions
How is cryptocurrency regulated?
No defined regulation is used to regulate cryptocurrency in the U.S. as of 2025.
However, a major crypto legislation was introduced in 2024, i.e. the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (or FIT21), that has been passed by the U.S. House of Representatives but has not yet been enforced. The legislation is aimed at emphasizing the role of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a lead crypto regulator in the U.S.
In the absence of one framework for cryptocurrency, the authorities try to regulate and enforce the already existing laws both at the federal and state levels, which are as follows.
Federal regulations
At the Federal level, regulations have predominantly dealt with various administrative agencies and bureaus.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The SEC primarily deals with securities such as convertible notes, stocks, debentures, etc. They aim to protect investors through mandatory registration of the securities that qualify for it.
The SEC brought lawsuits against major platforms such as Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, etc, for violation of regulations.
Due to the difference between the cryptocurrency and securities, a judicial split emerged in 2023, with Southern District of New York (SDNY) Judge Torres ruling in SEC v. Ripple Labs that only the institutional sales of XRP were securities, while Judge Rakoff in SEC v. Terraform Labs held that Terraform’s UST stablecoin was a security.
Courts remain divided on this issue at the time of this writing.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
CFTC is a federal agency that is tasked with regulating U.S. commodities and derivative markets.
The CFTC regulates cryptocurrencies as commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act and has developed jurisdiction in derivative markets, all of which are set forth in decisions such as CFTC v. McDonnell (2018) and CFTC v. My Big Coin Pay (2018), etc.
In 2017, the CFTC introduced a self-certification process for bitcoin futures which allowed exchanges to launch crypto derivatives. For enforcement measures, the CFTC has engaged in high-profile enforcement matters against Uniswap, Binance, Celsius, Ooki DAO, and secured an order against defaulted FTX to pay a penalty of $12.7 billion.
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Since 2014, the IRS has treated cryptocurrency as a digital representation of value which is different from a representation of the U.S. dollar or any other real currency. It functions as a unit of account, a store of value, and a medium of exchange.
Being categorized as property makes each sale, trade, or buying of cryptocurrency taxable under capital gains taxes like stocks or property. Regardless of whether one incurs profit or loss, correct reporting of the same must be done according to the IRS.
US Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Unit (FinCEN)
FinCEN was the first U.S. federal regulator to address cryptocurrency, by issuing guidance back in 2013.
It governs virtual currency businesses and wallet services as Money Services Businesses and mandates them to have anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regulations, specifically on Money Services Businesses dealing with Convertible Virtual Currency.
US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
OFAC is a regulatory agency that administers and enforces U.S. economic and trade sanctions to maintain national security and foreign policy interests.
These sanctions target countries, terrorists, narcotics traffickers, and other threats including those involved in cryptocurrency activities. OFAC applies the same sanctions compliance standards to transactions involving digital assets as it does to those involving traditional currency.
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)
In October 2021, the DOJ created the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET) to enhance its investigative resources to control criminal activity in the crypto environment.
The DOJ has been involved in several high-profile cases and has even charged the crypto market with insider trading, including against former Coinbase exchange employees.
Federal Deposit Insurance Company (FDIC)
After issuing joint prudential crypto releases in November 2021, the FDIC instructed all FDIC-supervised institutions in April 2022 to notify if they were conducting crypto business or intended to engage in it. This was required so the FDIC could review the information provided.
Federal Reserve Board (FRB)
FRB supervises the banking institutions and banking activities.
It issued reports on stablecoins and central bank digital currency in January 2022. After that jointly in 2023, with FDIC and OCC, the FRB released two statements on the risks that are associated with crypto assets and the participants.
The FRB also issued supervisory guidance requiring banks under its oversight to notify their lead supervisory contact before engaging in crypto-asset activities.
State regulations
Financial regulators for cryptocurrency at the state level are as follows:
New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS)
In contrast to other crypto regulations that have been prominently adopted by other states, New York has a different regime that is focused on customer protection.
It was the first comprehensive crypto regulatory regime among major U.S. states which led the way by introducing the concept of BitLicensees — used to self-certify the listing or adoption of new virtual currencies. However, it is generally considered to be prohibitive and burdensome by the market participants.
California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI)
On one hand, the DFPI has shown a friendly approach to the crypto market participants providing a narrow reading of state licensing requirements. On the other hand, it has implemented a comprehensive state crypto regulatory framework.
State attorneys general, including the New York State Attorney General (NYAG)
NYAG is one of the crypto regulators in the U.S. that has actively participated in filing charges and settling with the crypto platforms and market participants of all sizes.
International Standard-Setting Bodies
There is a constant rise in the involvement of digital currency transactions around the world, which often lightens the line between the borders as well.
Now, given the evolving complexities of digital asset markets, several prominent international financial standard-setting bodies have undertaken initiatives to regulate cryptocurrencies and make sure that they are regulated across jurisdictions.
Bank for International Settlements (BIS)
BIS acts as the central bank, and therefore it plays a role in shaping the regulatory framework for Central Bank Digital Currencies and stablecoins. BIS has issued various reports on stablecoin arrangements.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS)
BCBS is the primary global standard-setting body for prudential bank regulation, which has developed a framework to govern the exposure of banks to crypto assets.
Financial Stability Board (FSB)
The FSB contains the regulatory, supervisory, and oversight recommendations for crypto-asset markets which establishes high-level global standards for crypto regulation.
Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
FATF is a global authority on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing, it has issued extensive guidance on mitigating illicit finance risks in the crypto sector.
3 Key challenges
Cryptocurrency regulation in the U.S. presents significant challenges due to its fragmented nature, requiring businesses to comply with a complex framework of overlapping and, at times, conflicting federal and state laws.
- Since each state has different regulations, it makes nationwide operations difficult.
- Money transmitter licensing rules differ across states, which may be friendly or strict, making compliance restrictive and complex.
- There is a lack of clear crypto-specific laws which forces businesses to interpret existing financial regulations in different ways, leading to uncertainty and misinterpretation.
Special Report
Packet of subscriber resources from the legal industry’s most trusted how-to service
Access special report ↗
More expert resources
Get access and view curated resources maintained by our attorney-editors below when you sign up for a free trial.
Toolkits
Practice Notes
Crypto
Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban
Lawmakers Consider Crypto ATM Ban as Scam Losses Rise — Including in Central Minnesota
Minnesota lawmakers are considering banning cryptocurrency kiosks as scam losses continue to rise across the state—including in Central Minnesota.
There are currently about 350 crypto kiosks operating statewide, located in places like gas stations, convenience stores, and grocery stores. These machines allow users to deposit cash and convert it into cryptocurrency, which can then be sent electronically.
Law enforcement officials say scammers are increasingly directing victims to use these kiosks because once the money is sent, it is extremely difficult—if not impossible—to recover.
Police say scams often begin with a phone call, text, or online message. In many cases, scammers pose as government officials, tech support workers, or even romantic partners. Victims are eventually told to withdraw cash and deposit it into a crypto kiosk to “protect” their money or resolve a supposed emergency.
Central Minnesota has seen similar cases. Because St. Cloud serves as a regional hub for shopping and services, crypto kiosks are available locally, giving scammers access points to target area residents.
Some say kiosks also serve legitimate users
Despite the concerns, crypto kiosks do offer legitimate benefits. They allow people to purchase cryptocurrency quickly using cash, without needing a traditional bank account, credit card, or online exchange. Supporters say this can make cryptocurrency more accessible, especially for people who prefer cash transactions or have limited access to banking services.
Crypto kiosks can also be used to send money quickly, including international transfers, without relying on traditional wire services. Some users view them as a convenient way to invest in cryptocurrency or move money electronically without going through a bank.
Companies that operate the machines say the vast majority of transactions are legitimate and that kiosks include warnings about scams. They argue the focus should be on stopping scammers, not banning the machines entirely.
Lawmakers weighing next steps
Supporters of the proposed ban say removing the kiosks could help prevent fraud and protect vulnerable residents, particularly older adults. Law enforcement officials told lawmakers that crypto kiosk scams have resulted in significant financial losses statewide.
Minnesota passed regulations in 2024 requiring some safeguards, including limits on deposits for new users and refund requirements in certain fraud cases. But officials say scammers have continued to adapt.
The bill remains under consideration at the Capitol.
In the meantime, authorities urge Central Minnesota residents to be cautious. Officials emphasize that legitimate government agencies, law enforcement, and businesses will never ask someone to deposit cash into a cryptocurrency kiosk.
As cryptocurrency becomes more common, lawmakers are now weighing whether the risks to consumers outweigh the convenience and accessibility these machines provide.
10 (More) Hilariously Bad Google Reviews of Central MN Landmarks
Crypto
Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud: Bizman loses Rs 2.6 cr to crypto, investment fraud | Hyderabad News – The Times of India
Hyderabad: A 69-year-old businessman from Somajiguda lost 2.65 crore allegedly in a cryptocurrency and stock investment fraud. Based on his complaint, Hyderabad Cyber Crime police have registered a case.The complainant was first contacted by a fraudster posing as Ramya Krishnan on Aug 30, 2025 through Facebook. She persuaded the victim to invest in a cryptocurrency and stock trading platform, Polyus Finance PFP Gold, hosted at the domain pfpgoldfx.vip, promising high returns to finance his proposed resort and apparel ventures.Fraudsters provided the victim a contact number for daily communication and sent screenshots showing notional profits credited in his wallet in USDT cryptocurrency. To build trust, the fraudster even allowed the victim a token withdrawal of 4,300 on Sept 12, 2025.Encouraged, the victim transferred over 2.65 crore in 10 transactions between Sept 10 and Dec 39, 2025 to various current accounts provided by the accused.When he attempted to withdraw his ‘earnings’, the accused demanded an additional 15% conversion commission. After he refused, the website became inaccessible and calls to the fraudsters went unanswered.Realising that he was duped, the victim filed an online report on the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (NCRP) before approaching the Cyber Crime police on Feb 25.Based on his complaint, a case was registered under Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act and Sections 111(2)(b) (Organised crime), 318(4) (Cheating), 319(2) (Cheating by personation), 336(3) (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 338 (Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.) and 340(2) (Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on Wednesday. Police were analysing financial transactions to identify and arrest the accused.
Crypto
Terror groups receive $1.7b. from Iran through Binance | The Jerusalem Post
That was a potential violation of global sanctions, the report said, citing company records and documents collected by internal investigators.
The cryptocurrency exchange site reportedly fired or suspended at least four employees cited in the internal investigation. The company blamed “violations of company protocol” relating to its clients’ data, the Times reported.
The report came days after The Jerusalem Post spoke with experts from blockchain intelligence platform NOMINIS.io about how the Iranian regime was evading Western sanctions through cryptocurrencies.
The regime maintains a steady income using cryptocurrency through oil sales to Russia and China, NOMINIS CEO Snir Levi said at the time.
Regarding the latest scandal, he told the Post this week: “The latest allegations about Binance come months after the lawsuit by the victims’ families of October 7 – the ongoing Balva [versus] Binance case.
The majority of the allegations can be easily confirmed by on-chain data. There are thousands of cases where money has been sent and received to and from wallets that have clear connections to Iran.”
Binance founder Changpeng Zhao is being sued by the families of American victims and hostages of the October 7 massacre. He has been accused of knowingly enabling Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to transfer more than $1b. through its platform, including more than $50 million after the October 7 massacre.
Zhao pleaded guilty to anti-money-laundering violations in connection with Binance in 2023. US President Donald Trump pardoned him last October.
“They say what he did was not even a crime,” Trump told reporters last October. “It wasn’t a crime. That he was persecuted by the Biden administration, and so I gave him a pardon at the request of a lot of very good people.”
Binance representative Rachel Conlan said the accounts linked to the $1.7b. in Iranian transactions have been removed and the relevant authorities were informed.
“Any suggestion that Binance knowingly allowed sanctionable activity to continue unchecked is incorrect and defamatory,” she said, despite Zhao’s earlier admission of anti-money-laundering violations.
More than half a dozen compliance officials have left Binance, including a sanctions manager and the leader of the enterprise compliance team, over the past few months, the Times reported.
“No investigator was dismissed for raising compliance concerns or for reporting potential sanctions issues,” Conlan said in a statement to The Guardian.
Democrat senator opens inquiry into cryptocurrency company
While Conlan insisted there was no wrongdoing, US Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) opened an inquiry into Binance on Tuesday, seeking records of the company’s dealings in Hong Kong , where funds have previously been transferred in a network against sanctions.
“Binance appears to have ignored warnings and recommendations to prevent Iranian money-laundering schemes on its cryptocurrency exchange,” Blumenthal wrote in a letter to Binance co-chief executive Richard Teng.
“According to documents obtained by the Times and the Journal, Binance was even warned that Hexa Whale was financing terrorist organizations such as the Yemeni Houthis, and internal investigators found cryptocurrency transfers to wallets associated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and payments to crew members of Russia’s sanctions-evading shadow fleet of oil tankers,” he wrote.
“Instead of actually preventing illicit use, Binance has sought to evade accountability and influence the White House through lobbying and a financial partnership with World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the cryptocurrency firm owned by the sons of President Trump and his special envoy Steve Witkoff… This influence campaign has worked: In May 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it was dismissing a lawsuit against Binance for lying to regulators and mishandling funds, followed in October by the stunning Presidential pardon of founder Changpeng Zhao.”
“The scale of the newly revealed illicit transfers – uncaught until nearly $2 billion flowed to sanctioned entities – and the unexplained firing of internal investigators call into question Binance’s compliance with American sanctions and banking laws, and its 2023 agreement to resolve the previous federal investigation,” Blumenthal wrote.
-
World2 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts2 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana1 week ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Louisiana5 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Oklahoma1 week agoWildfires rage in Oklahoma as thousands urged to evacuate a small city
-
Denver, CO2 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Technology7 days agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Technology7 days agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making