Connect with us

Crypto

Cryptocurrency laws and regulations

Published

on

Cryptocurrency laws and regulations

Overview of regulations, how they’re regulated, key challenges, and more resources for legal professionals

Legal terms · Securities law · Cryptocurrency laws

The expansion of virtual currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum has put U.S. regulators in a dilemma between encouraging innovation and safeguarding investors.

The evolution of cryptocurrency is primarily due to the rise in technology worldwide. It has pushed financial boundaries, leaving with the possibility that cryptocurrencies may become the central element of the global economy.

The significance and impact of the use of cryptocurrency in the U.S. highlights the need to regulate it. However, there is a challenge in establishing a clear policy framework. With the digital revolution taking place through cryptocurrency, the state and federal governments are trying to determine how to define their role in regulating this new asset class in the best way possible.

Advertisement

Jump to ↓

What is cryptocurrency?


What is cryptocurrency regulation?


How is cryptocurrency regulated?


State regulations

Advertisement

International Standard-Setting Bodies


Challenges in the US crypto regulation

CoCounsel

Bringing together generative AI, trusted content, and expert insights for securities regulations

Meet your AI assistant ↗

What is cryptocurrency?

Cryptocurrency is a type of digital money that is a decentralized digital asset designed as a medium of exchange, utilizing cryptographic protocols to regulate the creation of new units. It exists only online and is not controlled by any government, central bank, or authority.

Advertisement

A digital or virtual currency that is not issued by any central authority, is designed to function as a medium of exchange, and uses encryption technology to regulate the generation of units of currency, to verify fund transfers, and to prevent counterfeiting.

Black’s Law Dictionary

(12th ed. 2024)

Cryptocurrency uses a secure technology called cryptography to keep transactions safe and verify fund transfers to prevent fraud. It operates on a decentralized system and transactions are recorded on a public ledger called blockchain. The regulatory treatment of cryptocurrency varies across jurisdictions, with legal considerations encompassing anti-money laundering compliance, securities laws, taxation, and consumer protection frameworks.

What is cryptocurrency regulation?

Crypto regulations are the legal rules and guidelines that are present and issued by governments to shape how digital assets such as virtual currency operate. These laws have varied approaches across nations.

Advertisement

In the U.S., there are various states wherein some are friendly towards market participants embracing crypto with clear regulations, while others ban it outright.

Around 60 percent of U.S. citizens lack confidence in cryptocurrency trading or investment, considering the existing systems to be unreliable or unsafe. One primary reason for this distrust may be the absence of a single, consistent set of laws to regulate cryptocurrencies.

The existing regulations range from covering everything about how cryptocurrencies are to be created and traded to how they interact with traditional financial systems. Well-defined rules can help the crypto market in the following ways:

  • Help in protecting investors from scams and market manipulation
  • Ensure that there is transparency in the transaction, along with accurate information
  • Help prevent illegal activities like money laundering, fraud, misleading information, etc
  • Clarify the tax rules that apply to digital currencies
  • Encourages market participation and confidence in the investors while encouraging blockchain innovation
  • Regulates the risks that are or may be associated with the transactions

How is cryptocurrency regulated?

No defined regulation is used to regulate cryptocurrency in the U.S. as of 2025.

However, a major crypto legislation was introduced in 2024, i.e. the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (or FIT21), that has been passed by the U.S. House of Representatives but has not yet been enforced. The legislation is aimed at emphasizing the role of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a lead crypto regulator in the U.S.

In the absence of one framework for cryptocurrency, the authorities try to regulate and enforce the already existing laws both at the federal and state levels, which are as follows.

Advertisement

Federal regulations

At the Federal level, regulations have predominantly dealt with various administrative agencies and bureaus.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

The SEC primarily deals with securities such as convertible notes, stocks, debentures, etc. They aim to protect investors through mandatory registration of the securities that qualify for it.

The SEC brought lawsuits against major platforms such as Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, etc, for violation of regulations.

Due to the difference between the cryptocurrency and securities, a judicial split emerged in 2023, with Southern District of New York (SDNY) Judge Torres ruling in SEC v. Ripple Labs that only the institutional sales of XRP were securities, while Judge Rakoff in SEC v. Terraform Labs held that Terraform’s UST stablecoin was a security.

Advertisement

Courts remain divided on this issue at the time of this writing.

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)

CFTC is a federal agency that is tasked with regulating U.S. commodities and derivative markets.

The CFTC regulates cryptocurrencies as commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act and has developed jurisdiction in derivative markets, all of which are set forth in decisions such as CFTC v. McDonnell (2018) and CFTC v. My Big Coin Pay (2018), etc.

In 2017, the CFTC introduced a self-certification process for bitcoin futures which allowed exchanges to launch crypto derivatives. For enforcement measures, the CFTC has engaged in high-profile enforcement matters against Uniswap, Binance, Celsius, Ooki DAO, and secured an order against defaulted FTX to pay a penalty of $12.7 billion.

Advertisement

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

Since 2014, the IRS has treated cryptocurrency as a digital representation of value which is different from a representation of the U.S. dollar or any other real currency. It functions as a unit of account, a store of value, and a medium of exchange.​

Being categorized as property makes each sale, trade, or buying of cryptocurrency taxable under capital gains taxes like stocks or property. Regardless of whether one incurs profit or loss, correct reporting of the same must be done according to the IRS.

US Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Unit (FinCEN)

FinCEN was the first U.S. federal regulator to address cryptocurrency, by issuing guidance back in 2013.

Advertisement

It governs virtual currency businesses and wallet services as Money Services Businesses and mandates them to have anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regulations, specifically on Money Services Businesses dealing with Convertible Virtual Currency.

US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

OFAC is a regulatory agency that administers and enforces U.S. economic and trade sanctions to maintain national security and foreign policy interests.

These sanctions target countries, terrorists, narcotics traffickers, and other threats including those involved in cryptocurrency activities. OFAC applies the same sanctions compliance standards to transactions involving digital assets as it does to those involving traditional currency.

U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)

Advertisement

In October 2021, the DOJ created the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET) to enhance its investigative resources to control criminal activity in the crypto environment.

The DOJ has been involved in several high-profile cases and has even charged the crypto market with insider trading, including against former Coinbase exchange employees.

Federal Deposit Insurance Company (FDIC)

After issuing joint prudential crypto releases in November 2021, the FDIC instructed all FDIC-supervised institutions in April 2022 to notify if they were conducting crypto business or intended to engage in it. This was required so the FDIC could review the information provided.

Federal Reserve Board (FRB)

Advertisement

FRB supervises the banking institutions and banking activities.

It issued reports on stablecoins and central bank digital currency in January 2022. After that jointly in 2023, with FDIC and OCC, the FRB released two statements on the risks that are associated with crypto assets and the participants.

The FRB also issued supervisory guidance requiring banks under its oversight to notify their lead supervisory contact before engaging in crypto-asset activities.

State regulations

Financial regulators for cryptocurrency at the state level are as follows:

New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS)

Advertisement

In contrast to other crypto regulations that have been prominently adopted by other states, New York has a different regime that is focused on customer protection.

It was the first comprehensive crypto regulatory regime among major U.S. states which led the way by introducing the concept of BitLicensees — used to self-certify the listing or adoption of new virtual currencies. However, it is generally considered to be prohibitive and burdensome by the market participants.

California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI)

On one hand, the DFPI has shown a friendly approach to the crypto market participants providing a narrow reading of state licensing requirements. On the other hand, it has implemented a comprehensive state crypto regulatory framework.

State attorneys general, including the New York State Attorney General (NYAG)

Advertisement

NYAG is one of the crypto regulators in the U.S. that has actively participated in filing charges and settling with the crypto platforms and market participants of all sizes.

International Standard-Setting Bodies

There is a constant rise in the involvement of digital currency transactions around the world, which often lightens the line between the borders as well.

Now, given the evolving complexities of digital asset markets, several prominent international financial standard-setting bodies have undertaken initiatives to regulate cryptocurrencies and make sure that they are regulated across jurisdictions.

Bank for International Settlements (BIS)

BIS acts as the central bank, and therefore it plays a role in shaping the regulatory framework for Central Bank Digital Currencies and stablecoins. BIS has issued various reports on stablecoin arrangements.

Advertisement

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS)

BCBS is the primary global standard-setting body for prudential bank regulation, which has developed a framework to govern the exposure of banks to crypto assets.

Financial Stability Board (FSB)

The FSB contains the regulatory, supervisory, and oversight recommendations for crypto-asset markets which establishes high-level global standards for crypto regulation.

Financial Action Task Force (FATF)

Advertisement

FATF is a global authority on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing, it has issued extensive guidance on mitigating illicit finance risks in the crypto sector.

3 Key challenges

Cryptocurrency regulation in the U.S. presents significant challenges due to its fragmented nature, requiring businesses to comply with a complex framework of overlapping and, at times, conflicting federal and state laws.

  1. ​Since each state has different regulations, it makes nationwide operations difficult.
  2. Money transmitter licensing rules differ across states, which may be friendly or strict, making compliance restrictive and complex.
  3. There is a lack of clear crypto-specific laws which forces businesses to interpret existing financial regulations in different ways, leading to uncertainty and misinterpretation.
Special ReportSpecial Report

Special Report

Packet of subscriber resources from the legal industry’s most trusted how-to service

Access special report ↗

More expert resources

Get access and view curated resources maintained by our attorney-editors below when you sign up for a free trial.

Advertisement

Toolkits

Practice Notes

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Crypto

The Cryptocurrency That Could Be About to Explode 1,000% | The Motley Fool

Published

on

The Cryptocurrency That Could Be About to Explode 1,000% | The Motley Fool

This tiny AI coin could be ready to skyrocket in 2026.

It’s slim pickings in the crypto market right now, with nearly every cryptocurrency down 25% or more over the past 90 days. But if you’re willing to dig for bargains and hold your nose at the same time, it’s possible to come up with some potential blockbuster plays for 2026.

My favorite pick right now is Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET 0.25%), down 68% over the past 90 days, and more than 80% for the year. This is exactly the type of beaten-down cryptocurrency that could be ready to explode higher by 1,000% or more over the next 12 months.

Rules for picking 1,000% winners

In order for any cryptocurrency to soar 1,000% or more within a relatively short period of time, it needs to meet a few key criteria. First of all, it needs to be dirt cheap — that’s the only way to attract speculative retail money. So, as a first cutoff, let’s narrow our search to beaten-down cryptos trading for $1 or less.

Second, the cryptocurrency needs to be in a red-hot sector or backed by a red-hot investment thesis. Within the blockchain and crypto world, there are plenty of potential hot ideas to choose from, including real-world asset tokenization, stablecoins, and decentralized finance (DeFi).

Advertisement

But let’s face facts here: If you try explaining real-world asset tokenization or stablecoins to your friends and family over the winter holidays, you’ll probably be met with a very frosty reception. The investment narrative needs to be easy to grasp and easy to explain. And I can’t think of a better one right now than artificial intelligence (AI).

Image source: Getty Images.

So let’s further narrow our search down to so-called AI coins. This was once a red-hot category, and includes some major names like Bittensor, Render, and Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET 0.25%).

The case for buying Artificial Superintelligence Alliance

Of these AI coins, the only one that’s trading for less than a buck right now is Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (the cryptocurrency formerly known as Fetch.ai). It has a super-low discount price of $0.20 — almost as cheap as some meme coins. In order for FET to explode in price by 1,000%, all investors need it to do is hit a price of $2.20.

Fetch Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-0.25%) $-0.00

Advertisement

Current Price

$0.21

Thankfully, it has already done that in the past. In March 2024, Artificial Superintelligence Alliance hit an all-time high of $3.47. So, getting back to a price level of $2.20 may not be as insurmountable as it seems at first.

Moreover, the crypto (via the involvement of Fetch.ai in the alliance) is at the forefront of the hot new field of agentic AI, so there’s plenty of long-term growth potential.

Just keep in mind that there’s a big reason the price of Artificial Superintelligence Alliance has cratered by nearly 95% over the past 18 months. Simply put, investors have given up on the “alliance” that was supposed to create the world’s foremost AI coin.

The multistep merger process that was supposed to result in a single token called ASI has gone on much longer than expected. It has also been much messier than many people expected. In October, Ocean Protocol — one of the three big AI players involved — finally pulled out of the alliance, and that sent the price of FET tumbling.

What can investors expect in 2026?

As recently as December 2024, the price of Artificial Superintelligence Alliance was around $2. That’s why I’m optimistic about a potential rebound in price in 2026. Crypto traders have likely overreacted and are now dumping this AI coin indiscriminately.

Advertisement

That being said, a 1,000% surge in price is by no means guaranteed. It’s quite possible that the price of Artificial Superintelligence Alliance could go to zero. So, buckle up now if you plan to invest in this AI coin — the path ahead is likely to be filled with turbulence and stomach-churning moves up and down.

Continue Reading

Crypto

China Discovers ‘Largest’ Undersea Gold Deposit in Asia as State Mining Ambitions Expand

Published

on

China Discovers ‘Largest’ Undersea Gold Deposit in Asia as State Mining Ambitions Expand
China says it has uncovered Asia’s largest undersea gold deposit, a massive offshore find that strengthens domestic supply, reshapes regional resource rankings, and highlights Beijing’s accelerating push to secure strategic minerals.
Continue Reading

Crypto

North Korean hackers allegedly stole record $2.02 billion of cryptocurrency in 2025. Here’s how they did it | Stock Market News

Published

on

North Korean hackers allegedly stole record .02 billion of cryptocurrency in 2025. Here’s how they did it | Stock Market News

North Korea remains dominant threat to cryptocurrency security in 2025, even while confirmed incidents have decreased, according to a report by blockchain analytics company Chainanlysis.

Hackers from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) allegedly stole a record $2.02 billion of crypto this year — a 51% jump compared to 2024, and taking their all-time total to $6.75 billion, it added.

The analysis further found that the DRPK is achieving larger thefts with fewer incidents, using unique methods to gain access and pull off their heists.

North Korea’s alleged crypto heists: Here’s how they did it

As per the report, these hacks were often carried out in unique fashion by embedding IT workers inside crypto services or using sophisticated impersonation tactics targeting executives.

Embedding IT workers

This is among the DPRK’s “principal attack vectors”, the report said. It added that the hackers secured jobs inside crypto services to gain privileged access and enable high‑impact compromises.

Advertisement

“Part of this record year likely reflects an expanded reliance on IT worker infiltration at exchanges, custodians, and web3 firms, which can accelerate initial access and lateral movement ahead of large‑scale theft,” it noted.

Fake jobs

Further, taking the IT worker model and “flipping it on its head”, the analysis said that DPRK-linked operators are also increasingly impersonating recruiters for prominent web3 and AI firms. This way, they orchestrate fake hiring processes that culminate in “technical screens” designed to harvest credentials, source code, and VPN or SSO access to the victim’s current employer.

“At the executive level, a similar social‑engineering playbook appears in the form of bogus outreach from purported strategic investors or acquirers, who use pitch meetings and pseudo–due diligence to probe for sensitive systems information and potential access paths into high‑value infrastructure,” it added.

Higher- value attacks

Over the years, DPRK-linked operators are increasingly undertaking significantly higher-value attacks compared to other threat actors. “This pattern reinforces that when North Korean hackers strike, they target large services and aim for maximum impact,” the report added.

It noted that “this year’s record haul came from significantly fewer known incidents”, including the massive $1.5 billion Bybit hack in February 2025.

Advertisement

DPRK’s distinctive laundering patterns

Not just the hacking process, the laundering of stolen funds is also distinctive, the report said. It noted that more than 60% of laundering was of volume concentrated below $5,00,000 transfer value tranches, despite the total stolen amounts being larger.

“Even while the DPRK consistently steals larger amounts than other stolen fund threat actors, they structure on-chain payments in smaller tranches, speaking to the sophistication of their laundering,” it added.

Continue Reading

Trending