Crypto
Banks In The USA Should Be Permitted To Own Cryptocurrency
President Donald Trump at the 2024 Bitcoin Conference in Nashville, TN.
The world of financial services is always evolving, but recently there are signs of a seismic shift. At the heart of this transformation is the rise of cryptocurrencies. Digital assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and a host of others – including stablecoins – have moved from the fringes of the financial system to the forefront, capturing the attention of investors, regulators, and, increasingly, traditional banks. As the cryptocurrency market continues to mature, one question that is becoming increasingly urgent to answer is whether banks in the United States should be permitted to own cryptocurrencies. If banks are to remain relevant in the rapidly changing financial landscape, then participating in the cryptocurrency markets is a necessary and logical step in the evolution of banking.
A Shifting Regulatory Landscape
Since the beginning of the crypto asset class, the relationship between banks and cryptocurrencies has been fraught with tension. Regulatory uncertainty, concerns over volatility, and the perceived risks associated with digital assets have kept banks on the sidelines. Most banks have even shied away from providing any banking services to companies and individuals who had interest in the digital asset class.
However, recent developments, particularly from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), have begun to pave the way for greater bank involvement in the cryptocurrency space. On March 7, 2025, the OCC issued Interpretive Letter 1183 (IL 1183), which provided much-needed clarity on the ability of national banks to engage with cryptocurrencies. The impact of this guidance is discussed in Banks In Crypto: The OCC’s Quiet Game-Changer.
Interpretive Letter 1183 affirmed early guidance that national banks can provide cryptocurrency-related services—such as custody and trading—as long as they do so in a safe and sound manner. The original guidance, articulated in Interpretive Letter 1170 in July 2020, was never withdrawn, but for almost five years it was practically disavowed.
Although the OCC has shown a path for banks to offer cryptocurrency services, the question of direct bank ownership of cryptocurrency remains a sticking point. In a joint statement from the OCC, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and Federal Reserve in January 2023, banks were cautioned against holding public cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin on their balance sheets (read: prohibited). The restriction, rooted in concerns over risk and stability, feels increasingly out of step with the realities of the modern financial system. The OCC recognized that was time to revisit this stance, and Acting Comptroller of the Currency Rodney E. Hood announced the OCC withdrew from the joint statement. Subject to safety and soundness considerations, according to the OCC, national banks have the ability to own cryptocurrencies outright.
Bringing Trust and Stability to a Volatile Market
Perhaps the strongest argument for allowing banks to provide products and services in cryptocurrency, and to own cryptocurrencies directly, is their unique ability to bring trust and stability to a market that desperately needs it. Banks have centuries of experience managing complex financial assets, from stocks and bonds to derivatives and foreign exchange. They operate under some of the strictest regulatory frameworks in the world, with requirements for capital reserves, liquidity, and consumer protection that far exceed those of the average fintech or cryptocurrency exchange.
Consider the high-profile collapses of platforms like FTX, Celsius, Voyager, and BlockFi, which left investors reeling from billions in losses. These failures underscored the risks of operating in a largely unregulated environment. By contrast, banks offer a level of security and oversight that is unmatched in the cryptocurrency space. FDIC insurance, rigorous compliance standards, and robust risk management protocols mean that customers can engage with digital assets through a bank with far greater confidence than they can through a standalone crypto exchange or lightly regulated fintech. Allowing banks to own cryptocurrencies would leverage this infrastructure to create a safer, more reliable ecosystem for digital assets.
New Revenue Streams and Competitive Relevance
Beyond stability, there is a compelling business case for allowing banks to own and provide services in cryptocurrencies. The cryptocurrency market can no longer be considered a financial niche: it is a multi-trillion-dollar asset class that continues to attract significant capital from investors across the spectrum. Banks that can custody, trade, and hold digital assets stand to capture a share of this growing market. More importantly, engaging with cryptocurrencies will allow banks to remain competitive in an era where younger generations—millennials and Gen Z—are increasingly integrating digital assets into their financial lives.
Take custody services as an example. As institutional interest in cryptocurrencies grows, so does the demand for secure storage solutions. Banks, with their established expertise in safeguarding assets, are perfectly positioned to meet this need. If permitted to own cryptocurrencies, banks could also offer innovative products—think crypto-backed loans or yield-generating accounts—that would attract tech-savvy customers and diversify revenue streams. In a financial landscape where margins are under constant pressure and fintech and crypto-native firms are encroaching on traditional banking activities, banks cannot afford to be forced to remain sitting on the sidelines.
Managing the Risks
It goes without saying that a discussion of banks and cryptocurrencies would not be complete without addressing the question of the risks. The price of Bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, has been known to swing 20% in a single day, a level of volatility that captures the attention of even seasoned risk managers. Critics have argued that by exposing banks to such fluctuations cryptocurrencies could jeopardize their stability and, by extension, the broader financial system. It is a fair concern—but one that overlooks and does not give appropriate credit to the proven ability of the banking industry to manage volatile assets.
Banks already navigate turbulent markets like foreign exchange and commodities with sophisticated tools: diversification, hedging strategies, and strict exposure limits. Applying these same principles to cryptocurrencies is both feasible and practical. Banks could further mitigate risks by focusing on well-established digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, which have already been designated digital commodities. The cryptocurrencies with significant market capitalizations also offer greater liquidity and resilience than newer, untested tokens. With proper regulatory guardrails—such as capital requirements tailored to crypto holdings—the risks can be managed effectively.
The Need for Regulatory Clarity
Regulatory clarity is traditionally the strength of the financial markets in the USA, and one of the reasons that the capital markets are the largest in the world. The American banking system is the engine for growth for the greater economy, and that engine does not function well when there is uncertainty. The OCC Interpretive Letter 1183 is a giant step forward, but the OCC does not have the authority to address bank ownership of cryptocurrencies on their own. With the newly reasserted OCC guidance, the 2023 joint statement from federal regulators creates a contradictory message: banks can engage with cryptocurrencies, but they cannot fully participate. This ambiguity will continue to stifle innovation and will leave banks uncertain about how to proceed, or whether they are permitted to proceed at all.
What is needed is a clear, consistent framework that allows banks to own cryptocurrencies and provide customers with products and services all while ensuring safety and soundness. The OCC, FDIC, and Federal Reserve should work together to update their guidance, drawing on lessons from the past decade of cryptocurrency evolution. Clear rules would not only protect consumers but also give banks the confidence to invest in the infrastructure—including blockchain integration and cybersecurity—needed to support digital asset ownership.
A Modern Financial System
Finally, the benefits of bank-owned cryptocurrencies extend beyond the institutions themselves. The broader financial system stands to gain from the modernization that digital assets can bring. Blockchain technology, which underpins cryptocurrencies, offers the potential to streamline cross-border payments, reduce transaction costs, and push financial institutions to move towards true round-the-clock operations. Banks, with their vast networks and customer bases, are ideally positioned to drive these innovations forward. By owning and integrating cryptocurrencies into their operations, banks can bridge the gap between traditional finance and the emerging digital economy.
Banks also cannot afford to be left behind from the growth in the use of stablecoins. Customer expectations are growing for the modernization of the payment infrastructure. Traditional payment rails are not enough, and customers are demanding alternatives. If banks are not involved in the innovation of stablecoins then banks risk fintech companies completely usurping their role in the space.
The Path Forward
The cryptocurrency revolution is here to stay, and banks must be allowed to play a central role in shaping the future. The recent guidance from the OCC is both a positive regulatory signal and a move in the right direction, but it is only the beginning of what is required. Permitting banks to own cryptocurrencies would harness their expertise to bring trust and stability to the market, unlock new opportunities for growth, and modernize the financial system for the digital age. The active involvement of banks will help ensure that the volatility is in the asset, and not in the stability of the financial institutions providing cryptocurrency services to customers. The risks are real, but they are manageable—and the rewards far outweigh them. It is time for regulators to take the next step and let banks join the crypto revolution in full. The future of finance depends on it.
Crypto
Cryptocurrency backed by Farage donor is used for Russian war effort, investigators say
A cryptocurrency backed by one of Nigel Farage’s biggest donors has been used to help Russia fight its war against Ukraine, British investigators say.
The National Crime Agency has spent four years trying to crack a multibillion-dollar scheme that exchanges cash from drug and gun sales in the UK for crypto, digital tokens that are designed to hide their users’ identities.
The scheme has enabled “sanctions evasions and the highest levels of organised crime, including providing money-laundering services to the Russian state”, the agency says.
Of the $24m (£18.3m) in crypto that the NCA and its counterparts abroad have so far been able to seize, the “vast majority” was issued by Tether.
A private company headquartered in El Salvador, Tether has grown so popular that it declared profits of $13bn for 2024, one-and-a-half times those of McDonald’s. Tether’s shares are reportedly owned by a small group, among them Christopher Harborne, one of the UK’s biggest political donors. Harborne took a 12% stake around 2016, court papers say, although it is unclear what share of Tether’s profits he has received.
In 2019-20, as the UK was leaving the EU, Harborne gave £10m to Nigel Farage’s Brexit party, since renamed Reform UK. In January, Farage accepted another £28,000 from Harborne to attend Donald Trump’s inauguration as president – the month after the US placed sanctions on the Russian bosses of the laundering networks and publicly warned they were using Tether.
Reform UK, the first British political party to accept donations in crypto, did not respond to a request for comment. Harborne’s lawyers said that accusing an investor in Tether of complicity in crimes perpetrated by users of its tokens would be “akin to claiming the US Treasury is an accomplice in money laundering because it prints the US dollar”.
While there is no suggestion that Harborne himself is implicated in the money-laundering scheme, some of his fortune appears to have come from a company whose cryptocurrency is in high demand from illicit networks such as the Russian ones unearthed by the NCA’s Operation Destabilise.
Unlike volatile cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin, Tether’s tokens are stablecoins, whose value is pegged to the dollar, making them easier to exchange for real currencies. Buyers of newly minted Tether stablecoins – called USDT – pay one dollar for each. Tether holds this cash to maintain the stablecoin’s peg, and makes money from the interest or investment return on it. About 184bn USDT are in circulation.
A Tether representative said the company “unequivocally condemns the illegal use of stablecoins and is fully committed to combating illicit activity”.
Quick Guide
Contact Tom Burgis about this story
Show
If you have something to share on this subject you can contact Tom using one of the following methods.
Email (not secure)
If you don’t need a high level of security or confidentiality you can email tom.burgis@theguardian.com.
Secure Messaging in the Guardian app
The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.
If you don’t already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select ‘Secure Messaging’.
To send a message to Tom please choose the ‘UK Investigations’ team.
SecureDrop and other secure methods
If you can safely use the tor network without being observed or monitored you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.
Finally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.
“Tether tokens are often acquired and circulated through secondary markets and peer-to-peer platforms. These flows are not controlled by Tether but we remain vigilant and ready to act when law enforcement identifies illicit activity,” the spokesperson added.
But crypto experts say all demand – including illicit demand – benefits the company by driving up the cash reserves from which Tether makes its billions in profit.
Harborne, a former McKinsey consultant, is not an executive at Tether. He also has interests in aviation fuel, military contractors and a wellness centre in Thailand, where he lives, going by British and Thai names. He describes himself as an “intensely private person”.
As well as helping Farage and his parties, Harborne has given money to the Conservatives and donated £1m to Boris Johnson when he left Downing Street in 2022. The Guardian revealed that after the donation Harborne accompanied Johnson on a visit to Ukraine. Neither has said why.
Johnson did not respond to a request for comment. A Tory spokesperson said: “All donations to the Conservative party are accepted in good faith and only after thorough due diligence to ensure they come from permissible sources. We take our legal and compliance responsibilities extremely seriously.”
NCA investigators say cryptocurrency has “turbocharged” money laundering, with the Russian laundering scheme switching to Tether shortly before 2020.
Sal Melki, the NCA’s deputy director of economic crime, said: “A line can be drawn from this money-laundering scheme to support for companies involved in the Russian military-industrial base.”
The NCA launched Operation Destabilise in 2021 when it rumbled a ransomware gang whose proceeds were being laundered by a Russian socialite. Working with their US, French and Irish counterparts, investigators established that the laundering network, known as Smart, and another, called TGR, were shifting billions of pounds.
The NCA’s investigators believe the TGR network has “supported companies involved in the Russian military-industrial base”. It has, they say, “facilitated the export of electronic components to Russia”.
Western countries have imposed sanctions seeking to restrict the Putin regime’s access to computer chips and other hard-to-find components for drones and missiles, yet the weapons continue to rain down on Ukraine. Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said in October that the weapons systems Russia used in a single day of deadly air attacks contained more than 100,000 foreign-made parts, including British microcomputers.
NCA investigators say Russian intelligence agents tried to fund a spy ring of six Bulgarians it was running in the UK via the Smart laundering network. The espionage included hunting an investigative journalist who had helped implicate Russian spies in the poisoning of the opposition politician Alexei Navalny. The Bulgarians were jailed in May after an Old Bailey trial.
The networks have also helped rich Russians in the west access cash – as much as £100,000 a time – to maintain the lifestyles to which they are accustomed despite sanctions, the investigators say.
The NCA has little hold over Tether, a spectacularly profitable venture in a largely unregulated industry based in a Central American dictatorship.
Melki said: “We work with any global crypto firm that wants to work with us, in addition to those regulated in the UK, but there’s no free pass for crypto firms. They all have a role to play in limiting their exposure to bad actors.”
The Tether representative said it had “a proven track record as the industry leader in working with global law enforcement to stop bad actors”.
The company has frozen or blocked more than $3.4bn in USDT in collaboration with more than 300 agencies in 62 countries, the representative added.
Crypto
Basel Power Struggle Deepens With Stablecoin Momentum Forcing Rapid Rethink
Crypto
ECB Monitors Surging Dollar Tokens With Heightened Focus on Volatile Spillovers
-
Vermont1 week agoNorthern Lights to dazzle skies across these US states tonight – from Washington to Vermont to Maine | Today News
-
Education1 week agoVideo: Justice Dept. Says It Will Investigate U.C. Berkeley Protest
-
Business1 week agoDeveloper plans to add a hotel and hundreds of residences to L.A. Live
-
Business5 days ago
Fire survivors can use this new portal to rebuild faster and save money
-
Southwest1 week agoFury erupts after accused teen sex predator dodges prison; families swarm courthouse demanding judge’s head
-
Culture1 week agoVideo: ‘Flesh’ by David Szalay Wins 2025 Booker Prize
-
Politics1 week agoMajor Pentagon contractor executive caught in child sex sting operation
-
Technology1 week agoAI-powered scams target kids while parents stay silent