Connect with us

Business

They Were Entitled to Free Care. Hospitals Hounded Them to Pay.

Published

on

They Were Entitled to Free Care. Hospitals Hounded Them to Pay.

In 2018, senior executives at one of many nation’s largest nonprofit hospital chains, Windfall, have been annoyed. They have been spending a whole lot of tens of millions of {dollars} offering free well being care to sufferers. It was consuming into their backside line.

The executives, led by Windfall’s chief monetary officer on the time, devised an answer: a program referred to as Rev-Up.

Rev-Up offered Windfall’s staff with an in depth playbook for wringing cash out of sufferers — even those that have been imagined to obtain free care due to their low incomes, a New York Occasions investigation discovered.

In coaching supplies obtained by The Occasions, members of the hospital employees have been instructed find out how to strategy sufferers and stress them to pay.

“Ask each affected person, each time,” the supplies mentioned. As a substitute of utilizing “weak” phrases — like “Would you thoughts paying? — staff have been informed to ask how sufferers wished to pay. Soliciting cash “is a part of your function. It’s not an choice.”

Advertisement

If sufferers didn’t pay, Windfall despatched debt collectors to pursue them.

Greater than half the nation’s roughly 5,000 hospitals are nonprofits like Windfall. They get pleasure from profitable tax exemptions; Windfall avoids greater than $1 billion a yr in taxes. In trade, the Inner Income Service requires them to supply companies, corresponding to free take care of the poor, that profit the communities through which they function.

However in latest a long time, lots of the hospitals have change into just about indistinguishable from for-profit firms, adopting an unrelenting deal with the underside line and straying from their conventional charitable missions.

To know the shift, The Occasions reviewed 1000’s of pages of courtroom information, inner hospital monetary information and memos, tax filings, and complaints filed with regulators, and interviewed dozens of sufferers, attorneys, present and former hospital executives, medical doctors, nurses and consultants.

The Occasions discovered that the results have been stark. Many nonprofit hospitals have been sick outfitted for a flood of critically sick Covid-19 sufferers as a result of that they had been working with skeleton staffs in an effort to chop prices and enhance income. Others lacked intensive care models and different sources to climate a pandemic as a result of the nonprofit chains that owned them had targeted on investments in wealthy communities on the expense of poorer ones.

Advertisement

And, as Windfall illustrates, some hospital methods haven’t solely lowered their emphasis on offering free care to the poor but additionally developed elaborate methods to transform needy sufferers into sources of income. The end result, within the case of Windfall, is that 1000’s of poor sufferers have been saddled with money owed that they by no means ought to have owed, The Occasions discovered.

Based by nuns within the 1850s, Windfall says its mission is to be “steadfast in serving all, particularly those that are poor and weak.” At the moment, primarily based in Renton, Wash., Windfall is without doubt one of the largest nonprofit well being methods within the nation, with 51 hospitals and greater than 900 clinics. Its income final yr exceeded $27 billion.

Windfall is sitting on $10 billion that it invests, Wall Road-style, alongside prime personal fairness companies. It even runs its personal enterprise capital fund.

In 2018, earlier than the Rev-Up program kicked in, Windfall spent 1.24 % of its bills on charity care, a regular manner of measuring how a lot free care hospitals present. That was under the typical of two % for nonprofit hospitals nationwide, in response to an evaluation of hospital monetary information by Ge Bai, a professor on the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Faculty of Public Well being.

By final yr, Windfall’s spending on charity care had fallen under 1 % of its bills.

Advertisement

The Inexpensive Care Act requires nonprofit hospitals to make their monetary help insurance policies public, corresponding to by posting them in hospital ready rooms. However the federal legislation doesn’t dictate who’s eligible without cost care.

Ten states, nevertheless, have adopted their very own legal guidelines that specify which sufferers, primarily based on their earnings and household measurement, qualify without cost or discounted care. Amongst them is Washington, the place Windfall relies. All hospitals within the state should present free take care of anybody who makes beneath 300 % of the federal poverty degree. For a household of 4, that threshold is $83,250 a yr.

In February, Bob Ferguson, the state’s lawyer normal, accused Windfall of violating state legislation, partly through the use of debt collectors to pursue greater than 55,000 affected person accounts. The swimsuit alleged that Windfall wrongly claimed these sufferers owed a complete of greater than $73 million.

Windfall, which is preventing the lawsuit, has mentioned it’s going to cease utilizing debt collectors to pursue cash from low-income sufferers who ought to qualify without cost care in Washington.

However The Occasions discovered that the issues lengthen past Washington. In interviews, sufferers in California and Oregon who certified without cost care mentioned that they had been charged 1000’s of {dollars} after which harassed by assortment brokers. Many noticed their credit score scores ruined. Others needed to in the reduction of on groceries to pay what Windfall claimed they owed. In each states, nonprofit hospitals are required by legislation to supply low-income sufferers with free or discounted care.

Advertisement

“I felt a bit of betrayed,” mentioned Bev Kolpin, 57, who had labored as a sonogram technician at a Windfall hospital in Oregon. Then she went on unpaid go away to have surgical procedure to take away a cyst. The hospital billed her $8,000 although she was eligible for discounted care, she mentioned. “I had labored for them and given them a lot, they usually didn’t give me something.” (The hospital forgave her debt solely after a lawyer contacted Windfall on Ms. Kolpin’s behalf.)

Gregory Hoffman, Windfall’s chief monetary officer, mentioned in an interview that The Occasions’s findings in regards to the hospital system’s therapy of poor sufferers “are very regarding and have our consideration.” He mentioned Windfall wished “to get issues proper, on behalf of our communities and on behalf of our sufferers,” although he acknowledged that the Rev-Up program initially had “some hiccups,” together with sending Medicaid sufferers to debt collectors.

Melissa Tizon, a spokeswoman for Windfall, mentioned the well being system stopped doing that in December, though that was two years after an government raised inner alarms in regards to the observe. Windfall has additionally instructed the debt assortment companies it really works with to not use “any aggressive ways corresponding to garnishing wages or reporting delinquent accounts to credit score companies,” she mentioned.

Ms. Tizon mentioned Windfall was the most important supplier of charity care in Washington. Whereas the hospital system has been offering much less of that care in recent times, she mentioned, Windfall has been treating extra sufferers on Medicaid, the federal-state insurance coverage program for poor individuals.

“Our practices adjust to and in lots of situations exceed state necessities,” she mentioned.

Advertisement

Windfall’s transformation from a small charitable group to an enormous hospital system mirrors the story of the nation’s nonprofit hospitals.

Windfall was based in 1856 when, on the request of a neighborhood bishop, Mom Joseph and 4 different nuns from the Sisters of Windfall trekked from Montreal to Vancouver, Wash., to supply companies to the poor. Their first hospital, St. Joseph, was a single room with 4 beds. The hospital charged sufferers $1 a day, not together with extras like whiskey.

Sufferers hardly ever paid in money, generally providing chickens, geese and blankets in trade for care.

On the time, hospitals in america have been set as much as do what Windfall did — present cheap care to the poor. Wealthier individuals often employed medical doctors to deal with them at house.

Given their work serving the indigent, hospitals have been exempted from state and federal taxes.

Advertisement

That system remained comparatively unchanged till the federal authorities created Medicare and Medicaid within the Nineteen Sixties. Tens of millions extra individuals out of the blue had insurance coverage that coated medical bills.

The I.R.S. started permitting hospitals to justify their tax exemptions by offering a broader vary of loosely outlined advantages to their communities past treating sufferers without cost. Some hospitals took benefit of the brand new leeway, arguing that issues like staff’ salaries counted towards the I.R.S. requirement.

High authorities officers warned that hospitals have been abusing their privileged standing as nonprofits.

“Some tax-exempt well being care suppliers might not differ markedly from for-profit suppliers of their operations, their consideration to the good thing about the neighborhood or their ranges of charity care,” the I.R.S. commissioner Mark W. Everson wrote to the Senate in 2005.

Some hospital executives have embraced the comparability to for-profit firms. Dr. Rod Hochman, Windfall’s chief government, informed an business publication in 2021 that “‘nonprofit well being care’ is a misnomer.”

Advertisement

“It’s tax-exempt well being care,” he mentioned. “It nonetheless makes income.”

These income, he added, assist the hospital’s mission. “Each greenback we make goes to go proper again into Seattle, Portland, Los Angeles, Alaska and Montana.”

Since Dr. Hochman took over in 2013, Windfall has change into a monetary powerhouse. Final yr, it earned $1.2 billion in income by investments. (Thus far this yr, Windfall has misplaced cash.)

Windfall additionally owes a few of its wealth to its nonprofit standing. In 2019, the most recent yr accessible, Windfall obtained roughly $1.2 billion in federal, state and native tax breaks, in response to the Lown Institute, a assume tank that research well being care.

The better the hospital system’s income, the extra money it may pump into increasing. As well as, the better its money reserves, the stronger its credit standing. A pristine score allowed Windfall to inexpensively borrow cash, which it may then funnel into additional development.

Advertisement

Over the previous decade, Windfall has opened or acquired 18 hospitals. Dr. Hochman earned $10 million in 2020.

Even earlier than the Rev-Up program, Windfall was amassing cash from poor sufferers, generally in violation of state legal guidelines, in response to 5 present and former executives and a overview of affected person complaints filed with regulators.

Harriet Haffner-Ratliffe, 20, gave delivery to twins at a Windfall hospital in Olympia, Wash., in 2017. She was eligible beneath state legislation for charity care.

Windfall didn’t inform her. As a substitute it billed her nearly $2,300. The hospital put her on a roughly $100-a-month fee plan.

Advertisement

It was greater than Ms. Haffner-Ratliffe, who was unemployed, may afford. She needed to ration gasoline for her automobile. In the future, her boyfriend walked into their condominium and located her surrounded by payments, crying. When she fell behind on the funds, Windfall dispatched a debt collector to pursue her.

For individuals already on the monetary brink, debt assortment firms can push them over the sting. The businesses usually inform credit-rating companies about sufferers’ money owed, which might torpedo their credit score scores. That, in flip, could make it a lot tougher and dearer to purchase or lease a automobile or house or to borrow cash.

Ms. Haffner-Ratliffe’s ordeal chopped her credit score rating by about 200 factors. For years, she couldn’t get a bank card. (Ms. Tizon, the Windfall spokeswoman, mentioned that the hospital had informed Ms. Haffner-Ratliffe about find out how to search monetary support however that she had not accomplished her software. Ms. Haffner-Ratliffe and her mother and father dispute that.)

Advertisement

Round that point, in 2018, Windfall was on the lookout for methods to save cash. It had just lately merged with one other nonprofit hospital system, and integrating the 2 was costly.

Windfall turned to the consulting agency McKinsey & Firm. The agency’s task was to maximise the cash that Windfall collected from its sufferers, the 5 present and former executives mentioned. In essence, the hospital system wished to use the ways it had used with Ms. Haffner-Ratliffe to much more sufferers.

McKinsey’s resolution was Rev-Up, whose title was an obvious reference to the purpose of accelerating income development.

Coaching supplies instructed administrative employees to inform sufferers — regardless of how poor — that “fee is anticipated,” in response to paperwork included in Washington’s lawsuit and coaching supplies obtained by The Occasions. Six present and former hospital staff mentioned in interviews that that they had been informed to not point out the monetary support that states like Washington required Windfall to supply.

One coaching doc, titled “Don’t settle for the primary No,” led employees by a sequence of inquiries to ask sufferers. The primary was “How would you prefer to pay that at this time?” If that didn’t work, staff have been informed to ask for half the stability. Failing that, employees may supply to arrange a fee plan. Solely as a final resort, the paperwork defined, ought to staff inform sufferers that they could be eligible for monetary help.

Advertisement

One other coaching doc defined what to do if sufferers expressed shock {that a} charitable hospital was pressuring them to pay. The advised response: “We’re a nonprofit. Nonetheless, we wish to inform our sufferers of their balances as quickly as attainable and assist the hospital put money into affected person care by decreasing billing prices.”

Employees members have been then instructed to shift the dialog to “how would you prefer to deal with this at this time?”

Exhorting staff to do their jobs nicely, some variations of the coaching supplies invoked a well-known line from a speech by the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: “If it falls your lot to be a avenue sweeper, sweep streets like Michelangelo painted footage.”

Ms. Tizon, the spokeswoman for Windfall, mentioned the intent of Rev-Up was “to not goal or stress these in monetary misery.” As a substitute, she mentioned, “it aimed to supply sufferers with better pricing transparency.”

“We acknowledge the tone of the coaching supplies developed by McKinsey was not according to our values,” she mentioned, including that Windfall modified the supplies “to make sure we’re speaking with every affected person with compassion and respect.”

Advertisement

However staff who have been accountable for amassing cash from sufferers mentioned the aggressive ways went past the scripts offered by McKinsey. In some Windfall assortment departments, wall-mounted charts formed like oversize thermometers tracked staff’ progress towards hitting their month-to-month assortment objectives, the present and former Windfall staff mentioned.

On Halloween at one among Windfall’s hospitals, an worker dressed up as a wrestler named Rev-Up Ricky, in response to the Washington lawsuit. One other costume featured an enormous cardboard greenback signal with “How” printed on prime of it, referring to the best way the employees was imagined to ask sufferers how, not whether or not, they’d pay. Ms. Tizon mentioned such costumes have been “not the tradition we try for.”

The Rev-Up program alarmed some Windfall staff.

“It was terrible working for this wealthy system and never with the ability to assist individuals who have been simply crying in entrance of me,” mentioned Stephanie Shufelt, who labored in affected person registration at a Windfall hospital in Portland, Ore., till February 2021.

Taylor Davison, who labored within the emergency division of a Windfall hospital in Santa Rosa, Calif., till final yr, mentioned Windfall’s ways had struck her as predatory. She was informed to strategy sufferers as quickly as medical doctors had completed analyzing them. She would crouch at their bedside and ask for cash. She was required to doc within the sufferers’ charts that she had repeatedly pushed for funds.

Advertisement

Workers have been urged to gather any quantity, regardless of how small, she mentioned. Some sufferers supplied as little as $2, which she accepted.

“Listed here are individuals coming in on the worst second of their lives, and I’m asking them to empty their wallets,” Ms. Davison mentioned.

Windfall paid McKinsey at the very least $45 million in 2019 for its help, tax filings present.

When sufferers left a hospital with out paying, Windfall despatched them at the very least three payments. In the event that they nonetheless didn’t pay, they’d obtain one final warning.

“That is your closing alternative to pay your account,” one such letter mentioned. In any other case, it went on, Windfall would enlist “a third-party company that will adversely have an effect on your credit standing.”

Advertisement

Underneath Washington’s legislation, Windfall was imagined to display screen sufferers on the hospital to evaluate whether or not they certified without cost or discounted care. However Windfall usually checked sufferers’ earnings solely after months of hounding them had failed, in response to depositions included within the Washington lawsuit and inner memos {that a} former Windfall government shared with The Occasions.

At that time, Windfall ran accounts by a screening device offered by Experian, a credit score reporting firm, to find out whether or not accounts have been eligible without cost care.

However regardless of Rev-Up, the quantity of free care that Windfall was offering was “spiking,” an government later defined in an e-mail to colleagues. So in 2019, Windfall’s chief monetary officer on the time, Venkat Bhamidipati, and different executives made a change, in response to the 5 present and former Windfall executives and depositions included in Washington’s lawsuit.

Beforehand, when treating sufferers who have been on Medicaid, Windfall finally waived any excellent portion of their invoice. In 2019, Windfall stopped doing that. Medicaid sufferers have been despatched to debt collectors as an alternative. That appeared to violate legal guidelines in Washington, Oregon and California that required nonprofit hospitals to supply free care to sufferers incomes under sure thresholds, in response to regulators.

Some Windfall executives warned that the modifications have been harming sufferers.

Advertisement

“I simply need it made clear to our management that sufferers that will usually have been eligible for charity care are going to dangerous debt,” Lesa Wooden, a director of economic counseling and help, emailed colleagues in late 2019.

In 2020, a Windfall government wrote to co-workers to report that the system’s charity care spending was down “throughout all markets.”

In November 2020, Paulo Aguirre went to a Windfall hospital in Orange County, Calif., with a splitting headache, blurred imaginative and prescient and nausea. Medical doctors gave him a shot that made the ache “go instantly,” he mentioned.

Mr. Aguirre earned minimal wage working at a dental workplace and was on California’s model of Medicaid, referred to as Medi-Cal. Underneath California legislation and Windfall’s monetary help coverage, his low earnings certified him without cost care.

In early 2021, Mr. Aguirre mentioned, he obtained a invoice from Windfall for $4,394.45. He informed Windfall that he couldn’t afford to pay.

Advertisement

Windfall despatched his account to Harris & Harris, a debt assortment firm. Mr. Aguirre mentioned that Harris & Harris staff had referred to as him repeatedly for weeks and that the ordeal made him cautious of going to Windfall once more.

“I strive my finest to not go to their emergency room although my daughters have gotten sick, and I obtained sick,” Mr. Aguirre mentioned, noting that one among his daughters wanted a biopsy and that he had hassle respiration when he had Covid. “I’ve this massive concern in me.”

That’s the end result that hospitals like Windfall could also be hoping for, mentioned Dean A. Zerbe, who investigated nonprofit hospitals when he labored for the Senate Finance Committee beneath Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa.

“They only wish to guarantee that they by no means come again to that hospital they usually inform all their associates by no means to return to that hospital,” Mr. Zerbe mentioned.

Final October, an ambulance rushed Alexandra Nyfors to the Windfall hospital in Everett, Wash. A diabetic, she was severely dehydrated, and her kidneys have been failing. Windfall put her on intravenous medicines to deal with an underlying an infection. She spent about two weeks within the hospital.

Advertisement

Ms. Nyfors, 66, is roofed by Medicare, and her solely earnings is about $1,700 a month in federal incapacity funds. Underneath Windfall’s insurance policies and state legislation, she was eligible without cost care due to her low earnings.

However Windfall billed her $1,950 — the quantity left over after Medicare coated its share. The remaining sum was daunting. It was getting colder, and Ms. Nyfors knew her heating invoice would gobble up a lot of her month-to-month test. However when she went on the hospital’s web site, she mentioned, there have been solely two selections: Pay in full or arrange a fee plan.

Ms. Nyfors agreed to have $162.50 robotically withdrawn from her checking account every month till the invoice was settled. She began shopping for fewer groceries, she mentioned. She went with out warmth. She break up her remedy in two to make it last more.

She had no thought she certified without cost care till she examine Washington’s lawsuit. After Ms. Nyfors was interviewed by The Everett Day by day Herald, Windfall forgave her invoice and refunded the funds she had made.

In June, she obtained one other letter from Windfall. This one requested her to donate cash to the hospital: “No present is just too small to make a significant influence.”

Advertisement

In 2019, Vanessa Weller, a single mom who’s a supervisor at a Wendy’s restaurant in Anchorage, went to Windfall Alaska Medical Heart, the state’s largest hospital.

She was 24 weeks pregnant and experiencing extreme stomach pains. “Let this simply be cramps,” she recalled telling herself.

Ms. Weller was in labor. She gave delivery through cesarean part to a boy who weighed barely a pound. She named him Isaiah. As she was mendacity in mattress, ache radiating throughout her stomach, she mentioned, a hospital worker requested how she want to pay. She replied that she had utilized for Medicaid, which she hoped would cowl the invoice.

After 5 days within the hospital, Isaiah died.

Then Ms. Weller obtained caught up in Windfall’s new, revenue-boosting insurance policies.

Advertisement

The telephone calls started a couple of month after she left the hospital. Ms. Weller remembers panicking when Windfall staff informed her what she owed: $125,000, or about 4 occasions her annual wage.

She mentioned she had repeatedly informed Windfall that she was already stretched skinny as a single mom with a toddler. Windfall’s representatives requested if she may pay half the quantity. On later calls, she mentioned, she was supplied a fee plan.

“It was like they have been following some script,” she mentioned. “Like robots.”

Later that yr, a Windfall government questioned why Ms. Weller had a stability, given her low earnings, in response to emails disclosed in Washington’s litigation with Windfall. A colleague replied that her money owed beforehand would have been forgiven however that Windfall’s new coverage meant that “balances after Medicaid are being excluded from presumptive charity course of.”

Ms. Weller mentioned she needed to change her telephone quantity to make the calls cease. Her credit score rating plummeted from an honest 650 to a awful 400. She has not paid any of her invoice.

Advertisement

Susan C. Beachy and Beena Raghavendran contributed analysis.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Business

Visa, Google, JetBlue: A Guide to a New Era of Antitrust Action

Published

on

Visa, Google, JetBlue: A Guide to a New Era of Antitrust Action
The latest

The Justice Department accuses Visa of unfairly stifling competition in debit cards, claiming the company has maintained a monopoly by imposing or threatening to impose higher fees on merchants that also use other payment networks.

Read more ›

President Biden’s top antitrust enforcers have promised to sue monopolies and block big mergers — a cornerstone of the administration’s economic agenda to restore competition to the economy.

Below are 15 major cases brought by the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission since late 2020 (including cases against Google and Meta initially filed during the Trump administration just before Mr. Biden took office).

Advertisement

The government has won several but not all the cases. And with only a few months remaining for the current administration, the number of suits is climbing, as regulators go after dominant companies in tech, pharmaceuticals, finance and even groceries.

  1. In a lawsuit, the D.O.J. said that more than 60 percent of debit transactions in the United States run on Visa’s network, allowing it to charge over $7 billion in fees each year for processing those transactions. Government lawyers argued that Visa penalizes its customers when they try to use competing services and that it has built a monopoly around payment processing.

    1. The Justice Department accuses Visa of unfairly stifling competition in debit cards, claiming the company has maintained a monopoly by imposing or threatening to impose higher fees on merchants that also use other payment networks.

      Read more ›

  1. The F.T.C. accused three big prescription drug middlemen, known as pharmacy benefits managers, of artificially raising prices for insulin drugs and making it harder for individuals to obtain cheaper options. The legal action targeted CVS Health’s Caremark, Cigna’s Express Scripts and UnitedHealth’s Optum Rx and subsidiaries they’ve created to handle drug negotiations. The three companies collectively control 80 percent of prescriptions in the United States.

    1. The F.T.C. files an administrative complaint, which is not yet public, that seeks to prohibit pharmacy benefit managers from steering patients to drugs that make them more money.

      Read more ›

  1. The F.T.C. sued to block Kroger’s $24.6 billion acquisiton of Albertsons, which, if allowed to proceed, would be the biggest supermarket merger in U.S. history. The companies said the merger would bolster their leverage with suppliers; the government contended that it would drive up prices for shoppers and suppress worker wages.

    1. The hearing, a mini-trial, lasts just over three weeks. The judge in the case has yet to issue a decision.

    2. The trial begins in Oregon, where both grocery companies have a significant presence. The case enters the spotlight as high food prices become a critical focus in the presidential race.

      Read more ›

    3. The F.T.C. and eight states, plus the District of Columbia, sue to block Kroger from acquiring rival supermarket chain Albertsons. They say the deal would most likely result in higher prices for groceries and weakened bargaining power for unionized workers.

      Read more ›

  1. The D.O.J. alleged Google harmed competition over the technology used to place advertising on web sites. The department and eight states said Google acquired rivals through anticompetitive mergers and bullied publishers and advertisers into using the company’s ad technology.

    1. The trial is expected to take about a month. The government has asked for a breakup of the company, requiring Google to sell off some assets.

      Read more ›

    2. The Justice Department and a group of eight states accuse Google of abusing a monopoly over the technology that powers online advertising.

      Read more ›

  1. An F.T.C. lawsuit sought to block Tapestry’s $8.5 billion acquisition of Capri, a blockbuster fashion tie-up to bring together Coach, Kate Spade, Michael Kors and Versace. The suit was a rare move by the agency to block a fashion deal, given that the industry does not suffer from a lack of competition.

    1. A hearing, which effectively serves as a mini-trial, begins over whether the government should put a halt to the deal while the F.T.C. can mount a case against the merger.

    2. The F.T.C. sues to block a merger of two fashion companies, Tapestry and Capri Holdings, that would bring together brands like Coach, Michael Kors and Kate Spade. The agency says the deal could force millions of consumers to pay more for “accessible luxury” accessories — less expensive goods sold by high-end firms — because the combined company would no longer have the incentive to compete on price.

      Read more ›

  1. An antitrust lawsuit filed by the D.O.J. and several states against RealPage, a real estate software company, said its technology enabled landlords to collude to raise rents across the country. It was the first major civil antitrust lawsuit to centrally feature the role of an algorithm in pricing manipulation, D.O.J. officials said.

    1. In its complaint, the Justice Department accuses RealPage of enabling a price-fixing conspiracy that artificially raised rents for millions of people.

      Read more ›

  1. The D.O.J. accused Apple of using a monopoly in the smartphone market to stifle competition and inflate prices for consumers. In its suit, the department said Apple blocked companies from offering apps that competed with Apple versions, including Messages and Wallet.

    1. Apple files a motion to dismiss the case, saying its business decisions didn’t violate antitrust laws. It has argued that those decisions make the iPhone a better experience.

    2. The Justice Department and 16 states, plus the District of Columbia, file a challenge to the reach and influence of Apple, arguing that the company has used anticompetitive tactics to keep customers reliant on their iPhones.

      Read more ›

  1. Live Nation Entertainment, the concert giant that owns Ticketmaster, stands accused of illegally maintaining a monopoly in the live entertainment industry. The D.O.J. said Ticketmaster provided exclusive ticketing contracts with concert venues, which helped Live Nation shore up its dominance, depriving consumers of better prices and options.

    1. The Justice Department, joined by 29 states and the District of Columbia, accuses Live Nation of leveraging its sprawling empire to dominate the live music industry by locking venues into exclusive ticketing contracts, pressuring artists to use its services and threatening its rivals with financial retribution.

      Read more ›

  1. A merger between JetBlue and Spirit, which would have created the fifth-largest airline in the United States, was blocked by a federal judge after a D.O.J. challenge. Government lawyers argued that smaller, low-cost airlines like Spirit helped reduce fares and that allowing the company to be acquired by JetBlue, which tends to charge higher prices than Spirit, would have hurt consumers.

    1. JetBlue and Spirit announce that they will not seek to overturn a court ruling that blocked their planned $3.8 billion merger.

      Read more ›

    2. In a 109-page ruling siding with the government, the judge in the case says the merger would “likely incentivize JetBlue further to abandon its roots as a maverick, low-cost carrier.”

      Read more ›

    3. The Justice Department files a lawsuit seeking to stop JetBlue Airways from buying Spirit Airlines, arguing that the $3.8 billion deal would reduce competition.

      Read more ›

  1. A lawsuit filed by the F.T.C. and 17 states against Amazon accused the retail behemoth of squeezing merchants and favoring its own competing brands and services over third-party sellers. A trial date is set for 2026.

    1. Amazon asks the court to dismiss the suit, arguing that the F.T.C. failed to identify the harm consumers were experiencing. It says the agency confused “common retail practices” with monopolistic behavior.

    2. The F.T.C. and 17 states sue Amazon, contending its online store and merchant services illegally stifle competition. The lawsuit that raises the possibility of altering the company’s structure.

      Read more ›

  1. The F.T.C. sued to block Microsoft’s $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard, which, if allowed to proceed, would be the largest consumer tech acquisition since AOL bought Time Warner more than two decades ago. The case follows scrutiny of the deal by regulators in Europe. Microsoft makes the consoles and platforms on which Activision’s games are played, and the merger of two companies that don’t directly compete is known as a vertical merger. Cases against vertical mergers have traditionally been difficult to win.

    1. Microsoft says it has closed its deal with Activision Blizzard, signaling that the tech industry’s giants are still free to use their cash hoards to get even bigger.

      Read more ›

    2. In a 53-page decision, a judge says the F.T.C. has failed to show the merger would result in a substantial reduction in competition that would harm consumers.

      Read more ›

    3. Advertisement
    4. The F.T.C. seeks a preliminary injunction to bar Microsoft from completing the deal before the F.T.C. has the chance to argue the case in its internal court. Microsoft argues a delay would essentially be killing the deal anyway.

      Read more ›

    5. In its suit, the F.T.C. says Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard would harm consumers because Microsoft could use Activision’s blockbuster games like Call of Duty to lure gamers from rivals.

      Read more ›

  1. The Justice Department sought to block a proposed merger between the largest publisher in the United States and a key rival.

    1. In an order, a judge says that the government has demonstrated that the merger might “substantially” harm competition in the market for U.S. publishing rights to anticipated top-selling books.

      Read more ›

  1. The D.O.J. sued to block UnitedHealth Group’s $13 billion acquisition of health technology company Change Healthcare, arguing that a deal would give UnitedHealth sensitive data that it could wield against its competitors in the insurance business.

    1. After a trial over the summer, a judge says in a 58-page memo that UnitedHealth’s incentives to protect customer data as it grows its businesses outweigh motivations to misuse the information.

    2. In a lawsuit, the Justice Department argues UnitedHealth Group’s deal to acquire Change Healthcare, a health technology company, would give the giant insurer access to sensitive data that it could wield against its competitors.

      Read more ›

Continue Reading

Business

Video: The U.S. Is Mining for Uranium

Published

on

Video: The U.S. Is Mining for Uranium

new video loaded: The U.S. Is Mining for Uranium

September 23, 2024

Miners at Pinyon Plain uranium mine, Arizona.

Latest Video
Hong Kong Protests
2020 Elections
Most-Viewed
Visual Investigations
The Dispatch
Diary of a Song
How We Got Here
Magazine
T Magazine
Op-Docs
Opinion

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Video: Federal Reserve Cuts Interest Rates for the First Time in Four Years

Published

on

Video: Federal Reserve Cuts Interest Rates for the First Time in Four Years

new video loaded: Federal Reserve Cuts Interest Rates for the First Time in Four Years

transcript

transcript

Federal Reserve Cuts Interest Rates for the First Time in Four Years

Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chair, said that the central bank would take future interest rate cuts “meeting by meeting” after lowering rates by a half percentage point, an unusually large move.

Today, the Federal Open Market Committee decided to reduce the degree of policy restraint by lowering our policy interest rate by a half percentage point. Our patient approach over the past year has paid dividends. Inflation is now much closer to our objective, and we have gained greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward 2 percent. We’re going to take it meeting by meeting. As I mentioned, there’s no sense that the committee feels it’s in a rush to do this. We made a good, strong start to this, and that’s really, frankly, a sign of our confidence — confidence that inflation is coming down.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Business

Continue Reading

Trending