Business
Elon Musk won’t be joining Twitter’s board, after all. Now what?
And identical to that, it’s over earlier than it even started.
Elon Musk, the richest man on the planet and an avid poster of Twitter memes, has declined a proposal to affix the board of the social community. The announcement from Twitter Chief Govt Parag Agrawal put an abrupt finish to any hopes the world had of watching one of many platform’s greatest provocateurs develop into a part of its administration — but it surely additionally raised the prospect of a extra full Musk takeover.
“We introduced on Tuesday that Elon could be appointed to the board contingent on a background test and formal acceptance,” Agrawal said in an organization briefing he shared. “Elon’s appointment to the board was to develop into formally efficient 4/9, however Elon shared that very same morning that he’ll now not be becoming a member of the board.”
“Elon is our greatest shareholder and we’ll stay open to his enter,” Agrawal added. A spokesperson for Twitter declined to remark additional on the scenario. Musk doesn’t have a media consultant.
The deal so as to add Musk to the board happened after he acquired a 9% stake within the firm to develop into its greatest particular person shareholder. Filings with the U.S. Securities and Alternate Fee indicated that the seat got here with an settlement by Musk to maintain his stake beneath 15%.
It’s not clear what occurred within the interim to derail issues. Internally, workers could have bristled on the appointment of a enterprise magnate who has beforehand used his platform to name individuals pedophiles, pump fringe cryptocurrency initiatives, get in hassle with the SEC, elevate doubts about COVID-19 vaccines and mock social justice activism. A current sequence of tweets criticizing the corporate could have additionally referred to as into query how ready Musk was to subordinate his personal impulses and grievances to the pursuits of the corporate and its shareholders.
The trail ahead is equally unclear. Musk appears to nonetheless have his sizable stake within the firm, and hasn’t but made good on past intimations at launching his personal, competing social community. These are the eventualities that might unfold from right here:
Musk cashes out
Though there’s little indication that he plans to take action, one possibility for Musk could be to promote his stake in Twitter altogether and return to his outdated relationship with the corporate: as one in all its greatest, loudest customers, quite than a co-owner.
Getting concerned within the first place could have already heightened his long-running battle with the SEC after he was tardy submitting a required kind disclosing the acquisition of his stake. Strolling away now would save him additional complications, whereas additionally giving him extra time to deal with his personal firms, together with Tesla and SpaceX.
He’d additionally flip a revenue have been he in a position to money out shortly. Though the information that he isn’t becoming a member of the board did trigger a temporary drop within the worth of Twitter shares, they’re nonetheless effectively above their value earlier than his funding went public.
Musk doubles down
An up to date SEC kind that Musk filed Monday reaffirms that after he declined Twitter’s supply to affix the board, he “could, every now and then, purchase further shares of Frequent Inventory” within the firm, leaving the door open for him to exceed the 15% possession cap he would’ve confronted as a board member.
Have been he to go far sufficient in that route, or accomplice with different activist shareholders, Musk might exert his will over Twitter extra immediately, forcing modifications in management or coverage to align the platform extra along with his imaginative and prescient for it as a no-holds-barred free-speech zone.
That’s an consequence monetary analyst Dan Ives says might occur. “This now goes from a Cinderella story with Musk becoming a member of the Twitter board and conserving his stake beneath 14.9% to possible a ‘Recreation of Thrones’ battle within the months forward,” Ives, managing director of fairness analysis at Wedbush Securities, tweeted.
Musk hangs round and performs gadfly
Even with no board seat and no modifications to his stake within the firm, Musk will definitely hold having many, many opinions about what Twitter is and what it needs to be. Utilizing the appreciable energy afforded him as not only a main shareholder but in addition one of many platform’s hottest customers — he has greater than 81 million followers whose opinions he often solicits by in-app polls — Musk will stay a robust stakeholder within the firm.
Certainly, Musk’s new SEC submitting outlines his freedom to “have interaction in discussions with the board and/or [Twitter’s] administration group” in addition to “specific his views to … the general public by social media or different channels.”
Among the modifications he might push for are ideological. Particularly, Musk has signaled frustration with how the corporate handles free speech by way of its content material moderation insurance policies. “Provided that Twitter serves because the de facto public city sq., failing to stick to free-speech ideas essentially undermines democracy,” he tweeted final month. “What needs to be finished?”
Different concepts are extra evocative of the emotional funding any super-user feels within the product they’re obsessive about. Musk has labeled cryptocurrency spambots Twitter’s “single most annoying downside,” for example, and reignited the long-standing debate about whether or not the app ought to let customers edit tweets after posting them (the corporate has mentioned it’s engaged on such a function, albeit doing so impartial of Musk).
He has additionally mentioned the corporate ought to let customers of its premium “Twitter Blue” subscription get verified — a mark of legitimacy, connoted with a blue check-mark, that’s at present reserved for politicians, journalists and different public figures.
Musk could also be betting that he can higher push for these types of modifications from outdoors of the board than inside it.
“He’ll have as a lot affect as a shareholder as he would as a director on this circumstance, merely due to his important public presence,” mentioned Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Middle for Company Governance. “At this level, it doesn’t matter whether or not he’s beneath the tent as a director, or outdoors the tent. He has important … title recognition, public consideration, and what he says about them can have affect.”
Final week, a Twitter spokesperson instructed The Instances that though the board “performs an vital advisory and suggestions position … each day operations and choices are made by Twitter administration and workers.”
Bloomberg’s Matt Levine, a longtime chronicler of Musk’s machinations, has additionally famous that had Musk joined the board, he would’ve been obliged to behave in shareholders’ finest pursuits, quite than simply pursuing his personal whims.
Now, Levine wrote Monday, “if Musk desires to alter how Twitter operates, he can get a gathering with Agrawal at any time when he desires, and ask for no matter he desires. If Agrawal says no, he can threaten to purchase extra inventory and take over the corporate.”
Business
Insurance commissioner issues moratorium on home policy cancellations in fire zones
California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara has issued a moratorium that bars insurers from canceling or non-renewing home policies in the Pacific Palisades and the San Gabriel Valley’s Eaton fire zones.
The moratorium, issued Thursday, protects homeowners living within the perimeter of the fire and in adjoining ZIP codes from losing their policies for one year, starting from when Gov. Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency on Wednesday.
The moratoriums, provided for under state law, are typically issued after large fires and apply to all policyholders regardless of whether they have suffered a loss.
Lara also urged insurers to pause for six months any pending non-renewals or cancellations that were issued up to 90 days before Jan. 7 that were to take effect after the start of the fires — something he does not have authority to prohibit.
“I call upon all property insurance companies to halt these non-renewals and cancellations and provide essential stability for our communities, allowing consumers to focus on what’s important at the moment — their safety and recovery,” said Lara on Friday during a press conference in downtown Los Angeles.
Insurance companies in California have wide latitude to not renew home policies after they expire, though they must provide at least 75 days’ notice. However, policies in force can be canceled only for reasons such as non-payment and fraud.
Insurers have dropped hundreds of thousands of policyholders across California in recent years citing the increasing risk and severity of wind-driven wildfires attributed to climate change. The insurance department said residents living in fire zones can be subject to sudden non-renewals, prompting the need for the moratoriums.
In addition, Lara asked insurers to extend to policyholders affected by the fires time to pay their premiums that go beyond the existing 60-day grace period that is mandatory under state law.
It’s not clear how many homeowners in Pacific Palisades and elsewhere might not have had coverage, but many homeowners reported that insurers had not renewed their policies before the disaster struck. State Farm last year told the Department of Insurance it would not renew 1,626 policies in Pacific Palisades when they expired, starting last July.
Residents can visit the Department of Insurance website at insurance.ca.gov to see if their ZIP codes are included in the moratorium. They can also contact the department at (800) 927-4357 or via chat or email if they think their insurer is in violation of the law.
The Pacific Palisades fire, the most destructive fire in Los Angeles history, as of Friday morning had grown to more than 20,000 acres, burning more than 5,000 homes, businesses and other buildings. It was 6% contained.
The Eaton fire, which has burned many structures in Altadena and Pasadena, has spread to nearly 14,000 acres and was 3% contained as of early Friday. Ten people have died in the fires.
Business
In Los Angeles, Hotels Become a Refuge for Fire Evacuees
The lobby of Shutters on the Beach, the luxury oceanfront hotel in Santa Monica that is usually abuzz with tourists and entertainment professionals, had by Thursday transformed into a refuge for Los Angeles residents displaced by the raging wildfires that have ripped through thousands of acres and leveled entire neighborhoods to ash.
In the middle of one table sat something that has probably never been in the lobby of Shutters before: a portable plastic goldfish tank. “It’s my daughter’s,” said Kevin Fossee, 48. Mr. Fossee and his wife, Olivia Barth, 45, had evacuated to the hotel on Tuesday evening shortly after the fire in the Los Angeles Pacific Palisades area flared up near their home in Malibu.
Suddenly, an evacuation alert came in. Every phone in the lobby wailed at once, scaring young children who began to cry inconsolably. People put away their phones a second later when they realized it was a false alarm.
Similar scenes have been unfolding across other Los Angeles hotels as the fires spread and the number of people under evacuation orders soars above 100,000. IHG, which includes the Intercontinental, Regent and Holiday Inn chains, said 19 of its hotels across the Los Angeles and Pasadena areas were accommodating evacuees.
The Palisades fire, which has been raging since Tuesday and has become the most destructive in the history of Los Angeles, struck neighborhoods filled with mansions owned by the wealthy, as well as the homes of middle-class families who have owned them for generations. Now they all need places to stay.
Many evacuees turned to a Palisades WhatsApp group that in just a few days has grown from a few hundred to over 1,000 members. Photos, news, tips on where to evacuate, hotel discount codes and pet policies were being posted with increasing rapidity as the fires spread.
At the midcentury modern Beverly Hilton hotel, which looms over the lawns and gardens of Beverly Hills, seven miles and a world away from the ash-strewed Pacific Palisades, parking ran out on Wednesday as evacuees piled in. Guests had to park in another lot a mile south and take a shuttle back.
In the lobby of the hotel, which regularly hosts glamorous events like the recent Golden Globe Awards, guests in workout clothes wrestled with children, pets and hastily packed roll-aboards.
Many of the guests were already familiar with each other from their neighborhoods, and there was a resigned intimacy as they traded stories. “You can tell right away if someone is a fire evacuee by whether they are wearing sweats or have a dog with them,” said Sasha Young, 34, a photographer. “Everyone I’ve spoken with says the same thing: We didn’t take enough.”
The Hotel June, a boutique hotel with a 1950s hipster vibe a mile north of Los Angeles International Airport, was offering evacuees rooms for $125 per night.
“We were heading home to the Palisades from the airport when we found out about the evacuations,” said Julia Morandi, 73, a retired science educator who lives in the Palisades Highlands neighborhood. “When we checked in, they could see we were stressed, so the manager gave us drinks tickets and told us, ‘We take care of our neighbors.’”
Hotels are also assisting tourists caught up in the chaos, helping them make arrangements to fly home (as of Friday, the airport was operating normally) and waiving cancellation fees. A spokeswoman for Shutters said its guests included domestic and international tourists, but on Thursday, few could be spotted among the displaced Angelenos. The heated outdoor pool that overlooks the ocean and is usually surrounded by sunbathers was completely deserted because of the dangerous air quality.
“I think I’m one of the only tourists here,” said Pavel Francouz, 34, a hockey scout who came to Los Angeles from the Czech Republic for a meeting on Tuesday before the fires ignited.
“It’s weird to be a tourist,” he said, describing the eerily empty beaches and the hotel lobby packed with crying children, families, dogs and suitcases. “I can’t imagine what it would feel like to be these people,” he said, adding, “I’m ready to go home.”
Follow New York Times Travel on Instagram and sign up for our weekly Travel Dispatch newsletter to get expert tips on traveling smarter and inspiration for your next vacation. Dreaming up a future getaway or just armchair traveling? Check out our 52 Places to Go in 2025.
Business
Downtown Los Angeles Macy's is among 150 locations to close
The downtown Los Angeles Macy’s department store, situated on 7th Street and a cornerstone of retail in the area, will shut down as the company prepares to close 150 underperforming locations in an effort to revamp and modernize its business.
The iconic retail center announced this week the first 66 closures, including nine in California spanning from Sacramento to San Diego. Stores will also close in Florida, New York and Georgia, among other states. The closures are part of a broader company strategy to bolster sustainability and profitability.
Macy’s is not alone in its plan to slim down and rejuvenate sales. The retailer Kohl’s announced on Friday that it would close 27 poor performing stores by April, including 10 in California and one in the Los Angeles neighborhood of Westchester. Kohl’s will also shut down its San Bernardino e-commerce distribution center in May.
“Kohl’s continues to believe in the health and strength of its profitable store base” and will have more than 1,100 stores remaining after the closures, the company said in a statement.
Macy’s announced its plan last February to end operations at roughly 30% of its stores by 2027, following disappointing quarterly results that included a $71-million loss and nearly 2% decline in sales. The company will invest in its remaining 350 stores, which have the potential to “generate more meaningful value,” according to a release.
“We are closing underproductive Macy’s stores to allow us to focus our resources and prioritize investments in our go-forward stores, where customers are already responding positively to better product offerings and elevated service,” Chief Executive Tony Spring said in a statement. “Closing any store is never easy.”
Macy’s brick-and-mortar locations also faced a setback in January 2024, when the company announced the closures of five stores, including the location at Simi Valley Town Center. At the same time, Macy’s said it would layoff 3.5% of its workforce, equal to about 2,350 jobs.
Farther north, Walgreens announced this week that it would shutter 12 stores across San Francisco due to “increased regulatory and reimbursement pressures,” CBS News reported.
-
Culture1 week ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports1 week ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics1 week ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics1 week ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics6 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health5 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week ago
South Korea extends Boeing 737-800 inspections as Jeju Air wreckage lifted
-
News1 week ago
21 states are getting minimum wage bumps in 2025