Sign up for the Today newsletter
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
Keeping open records in the dark is costing taxpayers in Massachusetts
As Sunshine Week comes to a close this week, government officials across the country will once again talk about transparency and accountability. In Massachusetts, however, a series of recent transparency failures shows just how far we have to go here in the Bay State.
For years, watchdog groups, journalists, and ordinary citizens have warned that Massachusetts has one of the weakest public records systems in the country. Deadlines are ignored. Fees are inflated. Enforcement is weak. And when state or local officials would rather keep information hidden, the burden too often falls on private citizens to drag those records into the light.
This is hardly a partisan critique.
On this point, even groups that rarely agree politically can see the same problem. Journalists have been forced to sue for access. Citizens have waited months or years for information that should have been produced promptly. Transparency should not be a left or right wing issue, it should be the bare minimum in a functioning democracy.
The recent examples are hard to ignore. One police department demanded $1.8 million for license-plate-reader records before that fee was later reduced. In Lexington, a school employee was caught discussing whether production costs could be inflated in hopes that a requester would give up. In Somerville, public officials spent years fighting over parking-permit data.
And then there is the state’s climate litigation against Exxon Mobil.
Massachusetts sued Exxon for allegedly misleading the public about climate change. Whatever one thinks of that lawsuit, the state put honesty, disclosure, and accountability at the center of its case. Yet when Exxon sought records related to Massachusetts’ own climate regulations and enforcement, officials resisted disclosure and triggered a separate legal battle over access to those documents.
What surfaced from that fight was incredibly troubling.
A regulation adopted under Massachusetts climate law requires state agencies with large vehicle fleets to track emissions and submit annual compliance reports. Those reports were supposed to begin in 2019. But according to sworn testimony from state environmental officials, not a single agency has submitted them. None. Regulators also acknowledged they had not conducted inspections or taken enforcement actions to verify compliance.
So, while Massachusetts was accusing Exxon of climate deception, the state was also fighting a records request that exposed its own failure to comply with one of its own climate rules.
That hypocrisy should concern everyone.
These reporting requirements exist to measure whether the state is actually doing what it says it is doing. If agencies are not filing required reports, and regulators are not enforcing the rule, then the public has every right to ask whether Massachusetts is serious about the climate commitments it promotes so aggressively.
Taxpayers also have every right to ask how much public money is being spent to keep that failure hidden.
That was the focus of Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance’s recent letter to Energy and Environmental Affairs Secretary Rebecca Tepper. According to state spending records, since last April, EEA paid a Boston law firm over $534,000, which includes $417,620 from “Climate Adaptation and Preparedness” funds and over $117,000 from funds labeled as “Environmental Affairs Administration.” When underlying payment records were requested, both DEP and the Comptroller reportedly said they had no responsive records.
Ironically, the money spent defending the state’s failure to comply with open records laws could have gone toward actual climate compliance or easing the burden on ratepayers and taxpayers. Instead, it appears to have been simply wasted on lawyers to allegedly cover up the state’s non-compliance on its own climate mandates.
That concern is even more urgent because the Healey administration recently estimated that their climate agenda could cost an eye-popping $130 billion by 2050, while an independent study by the Fiscal Alliance Foundation estimated the cost to be over $400B for the state. While Massachusetts clearly cannot afford more burdensome regulations that will drive businesses out of the state, if taxpayers are being asked to shoulder massive new climate costs the public should at least be able to trust that the laws already on the books are being followed.
Massachusetts officials are often quick to demand transparency from corporations and the Trump administration. But transparency cannot be a one-way demand.
Our elected leaders at Beacon Hill must hold themselves to the same standard they impose on the public. It is the foundation of public trust and a problem that Massachusetts has ignored for far too long.
Paul Diego Craney is the Executive Director of Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance
Local News
Lowell residents have filed a lawsuit against a data center and state environmental regulators, alleging the facility has harmed their neighborhood and that officials unlawfully sidestepped public oversight during its approval process.
The complaint, filed April 27 in Middlesex County Superior Court, targets the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and the data center’s owner, Markley Group. The 10 plaintiffs — members of a grassroots group known as Honest Future for Lowell — say the facility’s growth has disrupted life in the city’s Sacred Heart and Back Central neighborhoods, both long designated as environmental justice communities.
At the center of the lawsuit is a 352,000-square-foot data center that residents say looms over nearby homes, with cooling tower mist settling on properties and diesel generators contributing to noise and emissions. The filing alleges industrial generators sit behind a neighborhood little league field and that surveillance cameras monitor surrounding streets and backyards.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs say the lawsuit is the first against a data center in Massachusetts, potentially setting a precedent as similar facilities rapidly expand nationwide alongside growing artificial intelligence infrastructure.
The residents are represented by attorneys from Yale Law School’s Environmental Justice Law and Advocacy Clinic and the Conservation Law Foundation. Their legal challenge focuses on the DEP’s approval of a July 2025 air quality permit for the site and what plaintiffs describe as an “unlawful” administrative agreement that allowed construction during an ongoing appeal.
Stephanie Safdi, a Yale Law School professor representing the plaintiffs through the school’s Environmental Justice Law and Advocacy Clinic, said the lawsuit challenges both the DEP’s approval of an air permit for eight new diesel generators and the agency’s issuance of an “administrative consent order” that allowed construction to proceed before the appeals process concluded.
“We think it is unauthorized or unlawful permission for the company to go ahead and undertake these activities without going through the full permitting process,” Safdi said.
The dispute began in 2025, when Markley applied for an air permit to add eight new diesel generators at the site, bringing the total to 27 generators and 16 cooling towers. The DEP approved the permit on July 3, 2025. The residents appealed weeks later, but it was denied in August, according to the lawsuit. They were told they could continue the appeal individually as “aggrieved persons,” leading to the April 2026 lawsuit.
The plaintiffs are asking the court to revoke both the DEP’s air permit approval and the consent order, arguing the latter exceeds the agency’s authority.
Alexandra Enrique St. Pierre, vice president for the Conservation Law Foundation’s environmental justice program and a representative for the plaintiffs, framed the case as being about power imbalances between Markley, the state, and the community.
“This case is about fairness to a community that is simply trying to go about their lives in a place that they’ve called home for years and have a say in what that looks like,” St. Pierre said. “Pretty much everything that DEP and Markley have done in this case has been designed to exclude residents.”
She called the consent order a “secret side process.”
“Without telling anyone, they had entered into an administrative consent order to allow Markley to proceed as though the permit had already been granted,” she said.
The lawsuit comes amid growing scrutiny of data centers nationwide, as demand rises with the expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure. In Lowell, it also follows a recent city council vote to impose a temporary moratorium on new data center construction and expansion.
For residents, the lawsuit reflects years of frustration.
Plaintiff Mary Wambui, who has lived in Lowell since 2002, became involved after learning about plans to add more diesel generators to the data center.
“I decided to start going to the city council meetings and adding my voice,” she said.
Her concerns deepened when residents discovered construction activity during the appeal process.
“We were like, how did this happen in the middle of an appeal?” Wambui said.
Another plaintiff, Jacob Fortes, lives in a home that lies along the facility’s southern border where four diesel engines sit behind his house, the closest one being 84 feet away.
“How that was ever allowed to happen … is a fundamental breakdown,” he said.
Fortes said on a windy day, fumes from the diesel engines will come into the second story of his house, calling it “the nightmare situation of which I’ve been in for 10 years.”
“At the end of the day, I just want a balance of power between residents, companies, and state bodies,” Wambui said.
The Markley Group did not respond to Boston.com’s request for comment.
For the plaintiffs, it’s a cautionary tale for other communities facing data center development.
“The larger world needs to see what is going on in Lowell, Massachusetts,” Fortes said.
Lowell residents v. MassDEP, Markley
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
Here are notable performances from boys’ lacrosse players competing in Eastern Mass. conferences/leagues in the past week.
Henry Fowler, Dover-Sherborn — The senior attack posted 10 points (7 goals, 3 assists) in wins over Wayland (9-2) and Norwood (11-4), helping the Raiders reach 400 wins as a program.
Jackson Gearin, Billerica — The hero of last June’s thrilling D2 state final continues to find the back of the net. The junior tallied 13 goals and two assists in Merrimack Valley wins over Andover (7-6), North Andover (14-2), and Central Catholic (16-5).
Jack McCavanagh and Luke Renzi, Manchester Essex — Renzi went 19 for 25 at the faceoff-X and scored five goals, and senior captain Jack McCavanagh racked up six goals and six assists in wins over Hamilton-Wenham (11-10) and Triton (13-4).
Sam O’Brien, Marshfield — Leading the Rams to their first win over Hingham (8-6) in a decade, followed by a 15-2 victory over North Attleborough, the senior went 23 for 29 at the faceoff-X and added 3 points (2 goals, assist).
Jacoby Patterson, Shawsheen — Pacing the Rams offense with 11 goals and seven assists in wins over Pentucket (15-9), Winthrop (17-4), and Nashoba Valley Tech (19-1), the senior attack helped the undefeated Rams remain undefeated and debut in the Globe’s Top 20 poll.
Levi Tripp, Bridgewater-Raynham — The freshman attack has 11 goals over his last four games and posted a career-best 7 points (5 goals, 2 assists) in Tuesday’s 14-2 win at Plymouth South.
Nate Weitzer can be reached at nweitzer7@gmail.com. Follow him on X @nweitzer7.
LYNNFIELD — A wrong-way driver in a Jeep, later identified as Hernan Marrero, 50, of Roslindale, traveling south in the northbound lanes of Route 1 at 2:04 a.m. Wednesday crashed into a Massachusetts State Police cruiser, killing the driver at the scene and critically injuring State Trooper Kevin Trainor, who later died at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Trainor, who served with the Essex County Sheriff’s Department as a dedicated correctional officer from 2021 to 2023, was remembered by the department.
“In that time, he made a meaningful impact on those around him. He was known for his professionalism, his strong work ethic, and the genuine care he showed for his fellow officers and the people he served,” a statement from the Essex County Sheriff’s Department said.
It continued, “Kevin was someone his colleagues could count on. He was steady, respectful, and committed to doing the job the right way. His decision to continue his career with the Massachusetts State Police reflected his deep commitment to public service and his desire to protect others. Trooper Kevin Trainor will be remembered for his dedication, service, and sacrifice. He will always remain part of the Essex County Sheriff’s Department family.”
A press conference was held at the State Police Danvers Barracks with Gov. Maura Healey, Colonel Geoffrey Noble, and President of the State Police Association of Massachusetts Brian Williams.
“Today, the Massachusetts State Police mourns the line of duty death of trooper Kevin Trainor, who was senselessly killed this morning by a wrong-way driver,” said Noble, who is the superintendent of Mass State Police.
Noble said that Trainor’s shift had ended at 2 a.m. and that he had begun his commute home when a call came in for a wrong-way driver on Route 1 northbound in Lynnfield.
“Several dedicated troopers in the area responded, converging to the area and located the vehicle traveling the wrong way at 2:03 a.m. And just one minute later, at 2:04 a.m., a Jeep collided with Trooper Trainor’s cruiser head-on,” he said.
Later, he noted that Trainor had done what all troopers do on and off duty: “be there to help.”
Noble continued that the reckless actions of the driver “stole” Trainor from his family, including his “brothers and sisters with the Massachusetts State Police.”
“Today and always, we will stand beside them to support them in honor of Kevin’s memory… We will never forget his service as a decorated Massachusetts State Trooper. At just 30 years old, a trooper of only three years, Kevin epitomized what it means to be a public servant in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,” he said.
Noble said that Trainor had mentored others and set the standard for professionalism.
“He earned a place on the prestigious Troop A Community Action Team. It patrolled our roads with a singular focus: keeping the people of this Commonwealth safe,” he said. “… As one person put it, he was the guy you wanted as your backup. Not just on the job, but in his personal life too.”
Noble described Trainor’s actions as heroic and said that he was certain that if Trainor hadn’t stepped in, many more tragedies would have occurred.
“I am grateful to stand in this moment with our governor, the secretary of public safety, and our law enforcement partners today as we honor an extraordinary man, son, fiancée, brother, nephew, and friend who gave his life in service of others,” Noble said.
Healey expressed her condolences to Trainor’s family, stating that the Commonwealth had lost a hero.
“He was doing heroic work… Kevin came from a family of public service. His siblings, who I met, (an) EMT, a firefighter, a physician’s assistant, among others. And Kevin was about public service,” Healey said.
She continued that everyone should take the time to express gratitude toward law enforcement and that she will make sure the Commonwealth honors Trainor and his family.
Williams stated that he and the rest of the association are deeply saddened by Trainor’s death.
“His actions reflect the very essence of service and dedication to the communities we serve. Trooper Trainor is a hero. He served with courage, integrity, and an unwavering commitment to the state police, to his fellow troopers, and to the citizens of this Commonwealth,” Williams said.
He continued that the associations, Noble and his command staff, and the entire membership are working to support the Trainor family and department members.
The case remains under investigation by the Massachusetts State Police Collision Analysis and Reconstruction Section, Troop A Detectives, Crime Scene Services Section, State Police Detectives assigned to the Essex County District Attorney’s Office, and the Office of the Chief
Medical Examiner, according to the Massachusetts Essex District Attorney’s office.
Unmistakable Love of Austin, the Texas Longhorns and Each Other
Art Abounds on Campuses Outside of New York City
Canvas is down as ShinyHunters threatens to leak schools’ data
Iranian dissidents seize on Trump remarks about armed resistance, fueling revival of Reagan doctrine
Trump praises Susie Wiles’ cancer fight in surprise gala video: ‘Winning it decisively’
Hantavirus in the US: Where the rare, sometimes deadly disease has been found
Deonna Purrazzo touts Ring of Honor as having ‘great women’s wrestling,’ should be seen as landing spot
Humanoid robot named ‘Gabi’ ordained as Buddhist monk, pledges devotion to ‘holy Buddha’