This is Optimizer, a weekly newsletter sent every Friday from Verge senior reviewer Victoria Song that dissects and discusses the latest gizmos and potions that swear they’re going to change your life. We’ll be taking a break next week and will back March 20th. Opt in for Optimizer here.
Technology
Trump’s surgeon general nominee is running the wellness grifter playbook perfectly
On the surface, the wellness to MAHA pipeline can appear baffling. How does one get from wanting to be healthy to eschewing vaccines, drinking raw milk, and opting for beef tallow over sunscreen? The simple answer would be: widespread misinformation on online platforms, particularly from influencers.
I’d argue the real answer is slightly more nuanced — and something that I’ve been ruminating over since last week’s confirmation hearing for Casey Means.
Means is President Trump’s controversial nominee for surgeon general, a role often described as the “nation’s doctor.” It entails being America’s foremost spokesperson on public health, as well as educating the public using the best scientific information available. You’re probably most familiar with the surgeon general’s warning on cigarette packs and alcohol labels.
Some of the backlash is because Means currently doesn’t hold an active medical license, is not currently practicing, and never finished her surgical residency — all of which are generally considered prerequisites for the post. She’s primarily known for being a wellness influencer with, as many of her detractors point out, dubious beliefs and inconsistent record of disclosing financial relationships with brands. For example, Trump’s former Surgeon General Jerome Adams has penned an opinion piece directly criticizing her stance on vaccines and history as a tech entrepreneur who recommends supplements. As the cofounder of Levels, a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) startup that’s aimed toward non-diabetics, Means has frequently used her platform to promote CGM use. That’s not inherently bad, but there’s a lack of evidence for its use in non-diabetic populations. There’s also no consensus among experts on how to interpret CGM data in non-diabetics. Aside from a lack of qualifications, Means’ influencer background presents several ethical red flags.
Means tempered her beliefs during her confirmation hearing, despite having previously challenged vaccines, railed against birth control, and endorsed raw milk. I could probably write a separate Optimizer about each of those stances. But what I want to focus on here is the wellness to MAHA pipeline. Not only is it wildly profitable, but it’s got a very specific playbook.
Step one: establish credibility with selective science
If there’s one thing wellness influencers do well, it’s mixing actual science-based facts with emotional truths to lead their audience to potentially misleading conclusions. This is the most important part of any wellness influencer’s game.
Take Means’ book Good Energy, a New York Times bestseller cowritten with her brother Calley Means. The latter is a key figure in the MAHA movement, and serves as a senior adviser to RFK Jr. The book’s primary thesis is that metabolic dysfunction is at the root of every ailment you can think of, from acne to cancer. The front half of the book cites many true things about metabolism. For example, it goes into how mitochondria — the ol’ “powerhouse of the cell” — turns nutrients into cellular energy. She explains in digestible terms how mitochondria produce ATP, what ATP is used for in various bodily processes, and then goes into how certain factors of modern life may lead to “mitochondrial dysfunction.” She also goes into concepts like insulin resistance — when your body, over time, gets less responsive to the hormone leading to a less efficient use of blood sugar — and how it is heavily tied to conditions like diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. If you remember high school biology, or even searched these basic claims on Google, much of the information passes the smell check.
Throughout the book, Means also dispenses some solid, common-sense health advice. Things like sleeping eight hours a day, exercising, and opting for whole, unprocessed foods whenever possible. At the end of each chapter, Means includes a link to her references. Combined with Casey Means’ background as a graduate from Stanford School of Medicine, this can easily give the impression of a well-researched book by an expert with ample scientific backing.
The problem is those facts are interspersed with less convincing assertions, which all get tied together in service of questionable or misleading conclusions. For example, the book’s premise is that metabolic issues are often the culprit behind many ailments. That means, so long as you practice “good energy” habits that keep your mitochondria functioning, you can prevent cancer and a long list of other illnesses. The reality is scientists find combating mitochondrial dysfunction extremely challenging.
Here’s another example: erectile dysfunction. According to Means, erectile dysfunction is “generally rooted in metabolic disease, with reduced blood flow to the capillaries and nerves of the penis being a key factor, driven by the impact of insulin resistance on forming arterial blockages (called atherosclerosis) and blood vessel dilation.” She quotes another doctor, Sara Gottfried, as saying that erectile dysfunction is a “neon sign” for metabolic disorders. In the scientific references for the chapter, Means quotes her own blog for Levels on the subject as well as some other studies supporting some of the claims.
It is true that metabolic issues can lead to erectile dysfunction. But there are many other causes too. Many a standup comedian has opined about how performance anxiety, stress, or even too much alcohol can impact sexual performance on a given night. Certain medications or conditions like Parkinson’s disease can also contribute to it. Meanwhile, Gottfried is another doctor/wellness influencer who practices functional medicine like Means. Functional medicine is a controversial healthcare approach that attempts to take a holistic look at treatment, focusing on the root cause of a health problem instead of managing symptoms. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that, and some medical institutions like Cleveland Clinic have come to embrace it in recent years. But its critics have accused functional medicine of being a thinly disguised type of alternative medicine that depends on unnecessary blood testing, restrictive diets, and a ton of expensive supplements.

This is a lot of nuance that could easily fly over a reader’s head if they’re not familiar with the subjects at hand. There are some scientific truths in the mix, which give credence to other suspicious assertions that Means will make down the line.
By the end of the book, you might not blink twice that oral antibiotics, birth control, ibuprofen, fluoride toothpaste, scented candles, and perfume are listed as toxins. You might even find yourself at a dinner party, sharing a “factoid” that C-sections are suboptimal for a baby’s gut microbiome, because the infant doesn’t get the chance to ingest the mother’s vaginal organisms. (The truth is more nuanced). Heck, you might just heed Means’ advice and rehome your pet if they keep interrupting your sleep by daring to sleep on the bed. All of that is “bad energy.”
Step two: cast doubt on institutions
In her book and across her platforms, Means has touted the same origin story. After becoming disillusioned with the medical establishment, Means left to find a better way. To tell that story, she uses powerful anecdotes of her mother’s frustrating experience with the traditional medical establishment — as well as her own experiences as a surgical resident.
Means then pairs those emotional stories with other truths. Like the fact that pharmaceutical companies are greedy and do lobby legislators in Washington. Doctors have said they feel pressured to “overtreat” patients due to a number of factors, including financial incentives. From there, she makes the assertion that conventional medicine might be alright for treating acute ailments (e.g., saving your life after a car accident), but you should ignore doctors for chronic illnesses. Chapter three of Means’ book Good Energy is literally titled “Trust yourself, not your doctor.”
This is a potent narrative. Nevermind that Means hedges in her book, saying that she “deeply respects doctors.” The seed of doubt has been planted. It’s not a huge logical leap to This is the secret the establishment is not telling you. Or, You don’t need all those medications because the real profit is in keeping you sick. It’s right there on Means’ website. In a section detailing her controversies, Means asserts that she’s considered controversial because in part “she criticizes ‘sick care’ medicine for profiting from disease management, calls for reform of the Farm Bill, pharmaceutical incentives, food culture, and industrial agriculture.” Here, she’s painted herself as a warrior for health, someone who challenges the status quo because she couldn’t bring herself to participate in the system.
The Los Angeles Times reported on apparent holes in Means’ origin story, including that her former department chair said she quit her residency because of anxiety, not a disillusionment with the system.
But again, this requires the average person to dig deep on their own. All the influencer has to do is present themselves as a more genuine truthteller, exhort you to “do your own research” from links they provide, and offer up a product that will empower you to “take your health into your own hands” — a narrative RFK Jr. has used as well.
Conveniently, there’s an easy built-in counter for anyone who tries to refute these claims with information from reputable institutions: They are corrupt and lying to you.
Step three: offer ‘simple’ solutions that lead to profit
At this point, Means has established that she does research (even if the conclusions are at times questionable) and has a medical background. She’s consistently messaged that medical institutions aren’t trustworthy. The last step is to tell her audience she has the real answer to why everyone is sick (metabolic dysfunction) and how to fix it (several products).
As a wellness influencer, Means sells a lot of things. First and foremost, her philosophy of “good energy” and metabolic health, which has spawned a book and newsletter, complete with affiliate links for the “clean” products and supplements she recommends. In one of her “Good Energy” newsletters, Means recommends blood tests from Function Health — a standard part of her methodology — plus supplements like WeNatal and ENERGYBits, a form of spirulina algae and chlorella. (Nevermind that ENERGYBits was eviscerated on both Shark Tank and by the American Council of Science and Health as allegedly citing junk science and misleading product marketing. Studies have also not conclusively found health benefits to spirulina supplements.)

Means has financial relationships with all three brands, including newsletter sponsorships and partnerships fees. It’s expected that influencers are usually selling something, but the problem is there were no disclosures for any of those three brands in that newsletter.
That’s not an outlier either. While reading the Good Energy book, the only brand relationship I saw Means disclose was that she cofounded Levels. Once in the text itself, and once in the acknowledgements. Conversely, she recommended Function Health three times in the book and not once does she disclose that she’s an investor. Other brands she promotes but doesn’t disclose relationships to in the book include, once again, WeNatal and Daily Harvest, a health food delivery service.

An Associated Press investigation claimed that while Means did disclose newsletter sponsors, she failed to disclose affiliate links in a buying guide on her site. Meanwhile, Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization, wrote a letter to the FTC calling on the agency to investigate Means for allegedly failing to follow advertising disclosure standards. The nonprofit found that, with regard to affiliate links, Means neglected to disclose financial relationships 56 percent of the time.
The problem with wellness trends
It’s not guaranteed that Means will become surgeon general, but you can already see the impact of this common influencer playbook shifting public health. This strategy is why gray market peptides are popular. It’s why you see people starting to doubt vaccines and other medical treatments with decades of evidence.
It has an impact on health tech too. It’s why we’re starting to see gadgets that seem to spring directly from wellness trends. Hormone balancing and inflammation are two dubious wellness trends that are likely why I saw so many urine, blood, and saliva testing kits pop up at CES. Metabolism and nutrition are two areas where wearable and fitness tech makers are diving into with AI coaches.
The scariest thing about Casey Means and other wellness influencers is that some of what they say is true. They are rightfully honing in on genuine frustrations people have with our broken healthcare system and the overwhelming amount of contradictory information online. But where science says “the truth is complicated,” wellness influencers propose a simple solution: All you have to do is take out your wallet.
Technology
How the spiraling Iran conflict could affect data centers and electricity costs
Soon after the Trump administration launched its war on Iran, I called up Reed Blakemore, director of research and programs at the Atlantic Council Global Energy Center, to talk about the consequences. While oil and gas prices were already on the rise, there was still more hope then that the impact of the conflict might be short-lived. At the end of our conversation, Blakemore said plainly: “Let’s have a call again [next week] … We’ll have a much clearer picture of what the conflict is going to look like and what the story really is going to be for energy moving forward.”
Energy infrastructure has become a key leverage point in the unfolding war
It’s a week later and the conflict has only escalated since the US and Israel launched strikes against Iran, killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Energy infrastructure has become a key leverage point in the unfolding war, with Israel hitting Iranian fuel depots and Iran targeting Gulf neighbors’ oil and gas infrastructure in its own strikes. Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard threatened on Tuesday not to “not allow the export of even a single liter of oil from the region to the hostile side and its partners until further notice.” Iran has reportedly also started to lay mines in the strategic Strait of Hormuz, through which one-fifth of global petroleum consumption and liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade used to move.
I talked to Blakemore again today about what Iran’s continued chokehold on the Strait of Hormuz means for energy costs and US tech companies’ rush to build out energy-hungry AI data centers.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
What’s your outlook now on how the conflict is likely to affect oil and gasoline prices?
Reed Blakemore: The fundamental issue right now, in terms of the energy implications of the conflict, is how the market is reacting to the uncertainty around safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz.
At the outset of the conflict when we saw insurance premiums going up for these ships, we were largely talking about it in the context of, Hey, it’s just gotten much more expensive for a ship to traverse the Gulf and therefore they’re staying out.
We’ve moved from that to actual concerns around the security of passing through the straits in the first place, so this is no longer an insurance cost issue as much as it is a safety and security issue.
We have virtually no traffic passing through the Strait of Hormuz. A lot of countries are beginning to shut in production. So there’s already this ripple effect emerging purely because the market and basically tankers are fundamentally concerned about whether or not they will be able to safely pass through the strait.
“There’s only so much that US energy dominance can do to shield US consumers”
The other feature that I think we’ve seen the market react strongly to in the past several days is a sense of how long this conflict is going to last. And I think you can look to the comments from the president in the last 72 hours and the market’s reaction as a major piece of evidence to that end. Moving into the weekend where the campaign had clearly escalated, the uncertainty around how open the Strait of Hormuz would or wouldn’t be was beginning to reach a fever pitch. The response from markets when they opened in Asia on Sunday going past $100 a barrel to nearly $120 a barrel is really a function of the market not having a sense that this would be over anytime soon. That pullback that we saw over the course of yesterday was in response to the president saying fundamentally that Hey, we have an end in sight to this conflict.
The United States is a major oil producer. I think the strategy of US energy dominance played a significant role in terms of shielding US consumers from the initial market consequences of the decision to go to war with Iran. The price increases we’ve seen thus far would have been much more responsive to the market volatility. That has bought the administration a little bit of time as it relates to how long until we see the gasoline prices really begin to pick up steam domestically. But as this conflict persists and the volatility in the market continues, we will begin to see upward pressure on gasoline prices, regrettably, over time.
There’s only so much that US energy dominance can do to shield US consumers from what is a globally traded market in terms of oil. Because the United States is a major domestic oil producer, it has the ability to put some downward pressure on its own gasoline prices.
But because via its oil exports it participates in a global market, it has that exposure to global oil market volatility.
Can we expect electricity prices to go up also? Why?
For the United States, the gas story is a little bit better, but not immune from the global market as well. Natural gas is largely regionally traded within the United States. The US is a major producer of natural gas for domestic consumption in a way that further insulates it. That makes the case of the United States much different than the gas price sensitivity we’re seeing in Europe or in Japan or other parts of East Asia.
The problem is similar to the oil story because the United States is a major LNG exporter. As natural gas prices increase elsewhere, LNG exporters will be incentivized to export more gas because that’s where the arbitrage opportunity is, and that will create the upward price pressure domestically in the United States.
What risks does that pose to tech companies and this push to build out more AI data centers and related energy infrastructure?
In the United States, the majority of the data center buildout has begun to be powered by natural gas. We’re not going to see electricity prices reach a crisis point in the United States in the short term because of this conflict. The time horizon that we’re talking about with gas and therefore electricity prices is likely in the time horizon of months rather than weeks you’d expect with oil.
However, the longer this conflict lasts and the more tightness we see in the global gas market — that will eventually permeate the United States and create that upward pressure on gas prices in a way which then affects electricity prices and then that brings the data center question into play.
I think the unique thing is it doesn’t necessarily affect the ability of data centers to purchase energy. Electricity costs are a relatively marginal proportion of the cost of building and operating a data center. What it does do is it only further inflames the energy affordability challenges that are currently deteriorating social license in the country for data centers. So the impact on electricity prices likely won’t directly harm data center buildout. The ancillary affordability challenges it will create will further entrench popular discontent with data center buildout, because data centers are simply making consumer electricity bills much more expensive.
Technology
Burger King AI listens to workers
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The next time you pull up to the drive-thru at Burger King, you may notice something different. The greeting might sound warmer. The thank you might feel extra intentional. That could be Patty. The company is expanding a new AI-powered assistant that listens to employee headset interactions and tracks how staff speak with customers. The goal, according to executives, is simple. Create friendlier restaurants and smoother operations. But the rollout raises a bigger question. When does coaching become monitoring?
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter
BURGER KING MAKES CHANGES TO SIGNATURE WHOPPER FOR FIRST TIME IN NEARLY A DECADE
Burger King is rolling out an AI assistant named Patty to monitor employee drive-thru greetings and track customer interactions. (Eva Marie Uzcategui/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
What is Burger King’s Patty AI assistant and how does it work?
Burger King’s Patty AI assistant runs on technology from OpenAI. In practice, it listens for key phrases such as “Welcome to Burger King,” “Please” and “Thank you.” It then compiles that information into reports so managers can measure how consistently staff use polite language. Although company leaders say it is not recording every conversation, they frame it as a coaching tool designed to reinforce service standards.
Beyond tracking manners, Patty also supports daily operations. For example, it can answer questions about how many bacon strips go on a sandwich or how to clean specific equipment. In addition, it flags inventory shortages and alerts managers when machines stop working. It even tracks how often employees tell customers an item is unavailable, which can highlight supply gaps.
As a result, that data has already influenced menu decisions, including the return of apple pie after its removal in 2020. Taken together, Patty functions as a manners coach, kitchen assistant and data analyst rolled into one.
From pilot program to nationwide push
Burger King began testing Patty at about 100 U.S. locations last year. Now the company plans to expand to roughly 500 stores, with a goal of rolling it out nationwide by year’s end.
And Burger King is not alone. Rivals like Wendy’s, Taco Bell, McDonald’s, Pizza Hut and KFC have all tested AI in some form. Some experiments focused on automated ordering. Others used AI to streamline drive-thru operations.
Results have been mixed. Customers have praised the faster service. They have also complained about glitches and awkward robotic interactions. Burger King’s version stands out because it focuses on employee behavior, not just customer convenience.
TACO BELL TOPS NEW DRIVE-THRU SPEED RANKINGS, AND CHICK-FIL-A WINS ON SATISFACTION
Fast-food chains are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence to streamline service and boost efficiency. (Jeffrey Greenberg/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
Coaching tool or digital hall monitor?
Burger King says Patty exists to help managers coach teams and improve hospitality. Executives argue that customers want a warmer experience. Data simply helps restaurants measure it.
Yet social media reaction tells a different story. Some critics say constant monitoring creates pressure. They worry about employees having a bad day and getting flagged for forgetting a single word. Others describe it as surveillance disguised as support.
This tension reflects a larger trend in the workplace. AI increasingly measures performance in warehouses, offices and retail counters. Now it is moving into fast-food headsets. The real debate is not about politeness. It is about power.
The bigger AI trend in fast food
Fast-food chains operate on razor-thin margins. Small efficiency gains matter. If AI reduces waste, speeds up service and improves customer satisfaction, companies will keep investing. At the same time, public opinion matters. Customers say they value authenticity. Employees want fair treatment. The companies that succeed will need to balance both.
FAST-FOOD RESTAURANTS USING NEW TECHNOLOGY TO RESHAPE HOW CUSTOMERS PLACE ORDERS
Burger King plans to expand Patty to 500 U.S. stores this year, with a nationwide rollout targeted by year’s end. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
What this means to you
If you are a customer, you may notice friendlier greetings and fewer out-of-stock surprises. AI can help restaurants restock faster and fix broken machines sooner. That could mean shorter lines and more consistent menus. If you are an employee, the shift feels different. Every please and thank you becomes part of a data stream. Managers can track patterns instead of relying on occasional observations. For workers, that may increase accountability. It may also increase stress. For the industry, this signals a future where AI quietly runs in the background of nearly every transaction.
Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?
Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com
Kurt’s key takeaways
Technology keeps moving into spaces that once felt purely human. The drive-thru greeting used to be about personality and mood. Now it may be part of a data dashboard. Some will see that as progress. Others will see it as overreach.
If AI can measure kindness, should it? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
Technology
Slay the Spire II is even better with a friend
Slay the Spire II launched in early access last week, and it’s already an excellent sequel to one of the best roguelikes of all time. In many ways, it’s very similar to its predecessor. Like Hades II and Hollow Knight: Silksong, Slay the Spire II mostly iterates on an already superb foundation. But it does add online co-op with up to four players. While multiplayer changes the familiar rhythms of Slay the Spire just a bit, it’s still a great way to tackle the arduous climb up the spire.
A round of Slay the Spire II plays essentially the same as the original: In each run, you navigate three different acts across a winding map, slowly making a build by crafting your deck and picking up various perk-giving relics, and fighting enemies, elites, and bosses along the way. Slay the Spire II retains the deliberate, turn-based style of play, meaning that when it’s your turn, you have as much time as you want to decide what to do. Since you can see exactly what your enemies are planning for their next turn, there’s a lot of strategy in deciding how much damage to do and how much defense you might need to set up. Multiplayer adds a slight twist: When it’s your turn, everyone can play simultaneously. That opens up all sorts of new opportunities for planning, but it also requires communication to make sure everyone is using their cards effectively.
My multiplayer partner was my wife, the biggest Slay the Spire fan I know, and on our second run we got a thrilling victory. I played the new Necrobinder character, a necromancer, while she played as the returning Silent, which can make decks built around flurries of shivs. Over the course of the run, we accidentally settled into a strategy where I focused on applying the Vulnerable status to as many enemies as possible before my wife would rain down shivs upon our foes.
Slay the Spire II doesn’t encourage teamwork only in battles. At a campfire rest stop, you can choose to mend a friend’s health to help them out. (Some of the new enemies are tough, so I’m glad this is an option.) You each get a vote on which path to take next on the map. Everyone can draw on the map, too — as I learned many times after seeing the doodles my wife made when I would spend too long in the shop.
Since we had to communicate so much, our winning run took about an hour and a half, slower than how fast I could blast through runs in the first game. When we finally defeated the Act 3 boss, though, it was even more satisfying than most of my solo wins because we did it together. My one complaint is that co-op requires you to each play online on your own copy of the game, and that, because there’s no couch co-op, we each had to play on separate devices even though we were sitting on the couch right next to each other.
Those are annoying tradeoffs, but multiplayer is such a fun addition to Slay the Spire that I don’t mind. I can’t wait to try another multiplayer run and see what challenges — and doodles — are in store for me.
-
Wisconsin1 week agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Pennsylvania6 days agoPa. man found guilty of raping teen girl who he took to Mexico
-
Detroit, MI5 days agoU.S. Postal Service could run out of money within a year
-
Miami, FL7 days agoCity of Miami celebrates reopening of Flagler Street as part of beautification project
-
Sports6 days agoKeith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death
-
Virginia7 days agoGiants will hold 2026 training camp in West Virginia
-
Culture1 week agoTry This Quiz on the Real Locations in These Magical and Mysterious Novels