Connect with us

Rhode Island

In the bitter cold, more than a thousand people rally in Providence for ‘ICE Out!’ protest – The Boston Globe

Published

on

In the bitter cold, more than a thousand people rally in Providence for ‘ICE Out!’ protest – The Boston Globe


Amanda McCorkle also came to Providence from the southern part of the state and took her two children, Ada and Magnus Katter, out of school to participate in the “ICE Out! National Day of Action” protest

“It’s just too hard to ignore what’s happening right now,” McCorkle said.

“Stop killing people,” her daughter, 15-year-old Ada Katter, said. “Kids are seeing it, it’s hurtful, it’s scary.”

Amanda McCorkle and her children, Magnus, 10, and Ada, 15, protest against ICE near the Rhode Island State House.Christopher Gavin/Globe Staff
Protesters march down Canal Street in Providence holding signs. “From Rhode Island to Minneapolis, stop ICE terror,” one banner says.Christopher Gavin/Globe Staff

The rally turned into a march around downtown, blocking traffic at times, before returning to the State House. Families with small children were in attendance. Wind chills dipped into the single digits.

“Free our families, free them all,” one chant rang out. The protest drew more than 1,000 people and was peaceful. A Providence police spokesperson said no arrests were made as of 5 p.m.

Protests against ICE are being held nationwide on Friday and this weekend, as tensions reach a boiling point over the two killings. The Department of Justice earlier Friday said it was opening a civil rights investigation into the shooting of Pretti, but a similar investigation was not being opened in Good’s death.

Students from various Providence high schools and from Brown University also joined the protest Friday afternoon.

“We are here saying enough is enough,” said Dakota Pippins, a freshman at Brown. We’re not going to tolerate it anymore.” Pippins said students from Brown walked out of their classes to join the protest, which made its way up North Main Street toward the State House.

Advertisement

Students from URI, RISD, Johnson & Wales, Roger Williams, RIC, and CCRI also participated, he later confirmed, and student and graduate worker groups including the Deportation Defense Network, Brown Rise Up, Sunrise Brown, and the RI Student Climate Coalition worked together to coordinate the walkout.

Students, including from Providence high schools and Brown University, round the corner onto Smith Street to join a protest against federal immigration officials at the Rhode Island State House.Carlos Muñoz/Globe Staff
Protesters against ICE hold signs outside the Rhode Island State House in Providence.Christopher Gavin/Globe Staff

“What people are really bothered by is the horrifying violence of it,” Pippins said, referencing the Pretti killing. “And just the fact that the highest officials in our nation would then call him a terrorist, an assassin, trying to murder people, when we have video evidence that so clearly refutes that, is just sickening.”

Manuel Urizar, a senior at Hope High School, said he walked out of school with around 50 other students. He said he has heard people say that protesting ICE is causing “unnecessary fear.”

“It’s not unnecessary where there is the possibility that anyone from our family, our friends … are just being taken off the streets,” Urizar said.

Matthew Muller walks with a giant inflatable whistle, an homage to the whistles used in Minneapolis to warn neighbors that ICE is coming.Christopher Gavin, Globe Staff

Matthew Muller marched with a massive inflatable orange whistle created by his Providence-based art studio Pneuhaus, a reference to the whistles used in Minneapolis to warn neighbors that ICE is nearby.

“People are intimidated to join the ICE watch, and I think inflatables are a playful way to get past the barriers that these political issues bring up,” Muller said.

Providence Mayor Brett Smiley on Friday had just returned from a US Conference of Mayors meeting where he spoke to Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, along with the mayors of Los Angeles and Portland, where major ICE enforcement actions have taken place.

Advertisement

“We’ve been so appalled and offended by the lawlessness that we’ve seen, and heartbroken by the harm that’s been done,” Smiley said.

He said there’s been a “tone and tactic shift” from many mayors, including himself, who initially sought to avoid drawing the attention of the Trump administration, for fear of being the next city targeted.

Now, he said, “enforcement priority locations seem to have nothing to do with anything other than political grudges or retribution from the administration, and so ‘keeping your head down’ maybe does, maybe doesn’t keep you off the hit list,” Smiley said.

Protest against ICE at Rhode Island State House in Providence.Christopher Gavin/Globe Staff

He signed an executive order earlier this month barring ICE from using city property for its operations. The city has a separate ordinance barring police from helping ICE with civil immigration enforcement.

Smiley said the city’s emergency management agency has been preparing in case Providence is targeted by a major ICE enforcement.

There is no specific reason to believe Providence will be targeted, he said, “but there’s no reason to believe they were going to target Portland, Maine, either.”

Advertisement

State Representative David Morales, who is running against Smiley for mayor, said he was “terrified” that an immigration action could happen here.

“If I was mayor, we would be towing ICE vehicles out of our city any time they violate our sanctuary city laws,” Morales said.

Protesters march through downtown Providence.Christopher Gavin/Globe Staff

Christopher Gavin can be reached at christopher.gavin@globe.com. Steph Machado can be reached at steph.machado@globe.com. Follow her @StephMachado. Carlos Muñoz can be reached at carlos.munoz@globe.com. Follow him @ReadCarlos and on Instagram @Carlosbrknews.





Source link

Rhode Island

R.I. grandparents fighting for visits with 4-year-old granddaughter rest their case – The Boston Globe

Published

on

R.I. grandparents fighting for visits with 4-year-old granddaughter rest their case – The Boston Globe


Naso’s in-laws, Dr. Siavash Ghoreishi and Dr. Jila Khorsand, took him to Family Court in July 2024, three months after their daughter, Shahrzad “Sherry” Naso, died from metastasized breast cancer.

Naso had refused to let them see Laila, their only grandchild of their only daughter, saying he wasn’t comfortable with their behavior and was alarmed by their medical care of Sherry and Laila.

Scott Naso and his daughter, Laila, in their Portsmouth, R.I., home.Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff

The retired physicians used a little-known state law that allows grandparents whose children have died or divorced to petition the Family Court for the right to visit with their grandchildren.

It’s led to a bitter trial that began in October and has continued off and on over the last six months, with testimony about medical negligence, abuse, and control.

Naso, a Middletown narcotics detective, accuses his in-laws of prescribing dozens of medications and providing poor medical care, which he believes contributed to Sherry’s death and sickened Laila. Ghoreishi and Khorsand deny any wrongdoing.

“We love that child with every fabric of our beings and have never harmed her in any way or shape,” Khorsand testified in October. “I love that child to death and would never do anything to harm her. … Why would she be deprived of this love?”

Naso has argued that the expense of the trial and the state law allowing grandparents to sue parents for visitation violates his constitutional parental rights.

Advertisement

But Gill said on Monday that the state law was “narrowly tailored” to respect the constitutional rights of parents, and he denied Naso’s motions to dismiss or stay the ongoing trial.

Now that Michael Ahn, the lawyer for Ghoreishi and Khorsand, has rested his case, Naso’s lawyer will argue that the grandparents haven’t met their burden under the law and the case should be dismissed.

Veronica Assalone told the judge that she will argue for the dismissal on Thursday.

If her motion is denied, and the Supreme Court justices reject the emergency motion, the trial proceedings will resume, with at least a dozen witnesses expected to testify on Naso’s behalf.

On Wednesday, the court heard more testimony from Cheryl Allspach, the former longtime office manager for Ghoreishi’s pediatric practice and a close friend of the family. She had testified glowingly on Tuesday about Ghoreishi and Khorsand’s relationship with Laila.

Advertisement

She also testified about Ghoreishi’s recordkeeping at his practice and his medical treatment of Scott, Sherry, and Laila Naso, and explained the process for billing and filing for insurance claims.

Assalone questioned her about Blue Cross Blue Shield of Rhode Island’s payment policy, since 2009, regarding self-treatment and treatment of immediate family members. The insurer’s policy follows the American Medical Association code of ethics, which warns physicians not to treat or prescribe medications for themselves and close family members, and does not cover those services.

Allspach read the two-page policy aloud for the court. “Why did you bill?” the judge asked when she concluded.

“I just did it as part of normal billing, and truly I didn’t realize that,” Allspach said. “If I realized, I would have said to [Ghoreishi], ‘you cannot treat your family members.’”

The judge quickly stopped more detailed questions about billing practices, chart-keeping, and whether Allspach was aware that it was a felony for physicians to prescribe narcotics to relatives.

Advertisement

“It’s a grandparent visitation case, not a medical malpractice case,” Gill snapped at Assalone. He added that she should take her claims about illegal prescriptions to the state police, “not here.”

Julie Emmer, the owner of Strengthening Family Foundations, testified that Naso had alleged “serious things” about his in-law’s medical care when she was handling the supervised visits between Laila and Ghoreishi and Khorsand.

Emmer testified that Naso told her “there were prescriptions in different names for his late wife” and that his in-laws were being investigated by the US Drug Enforcement Administration and the state police.

“He thought they shouldn’t have visits,” Emmer said. “He thought they were responsible for what happened to his wife.”

Emmer began supervising visits in September 2024, after then-Family Court Judge Debra DiSegna temporarily ordered one-hour supervised visits every other week. The visits continued until late January 2025 and were suspended after Naso filed a complaint with the Department of Children, Youth, and Families. The investigation was closed, but Naso has refused to resume visits.

Advertisement

Emmer supervised nine visits, all at public places, and performed a home inspection at the grandparents’ condo in Jamestown at Ahn’s request in December 2023. They wanted to visit with Laila at their home, but Naso refused, Emmer said, and he is the custodial parent.

Emmer testified that the grandparents abided by the court order not to give Laila any gifts or medication.

Khorsand played with the little girl, while Ghoreishi stayed in the background, filming them or taking pictures, Emmer said. (Some of the photos and videos have been entered as evidence in the trial.)

Emmer said she noticed over time that Laila was anxious at the start of the visits and said she didn’t want to go. During one visit, she said, Laila whispered to her over and over “they are bad people.” At another visit, Laila was late because she vomited on the way over, she said.

She told the court that Laila would eventually warm up to her grandparents.

Advertisement

Emmer said she saw Naso crying and shaking, but that he was careful to compose himself so Laila didn’t see him becoming emotional. She testified that she didn’t hear him make any derogatory comments about his in-laws in Laila’s presence.

She said that Laila was reluctant to leave her father during the visits, but he encouraged her to go. “He often made comments, ‘Go have fun with Miss Julie. You’ll be safe,’” she said.


Amanda Milkovits can be reached at amanda.milkovits@globe.com. Follow her @AmandaMilkovits.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Rhode Island shifts its primary to Wednesday, Sept. 9, easing a Labor Day poll setup crunch

Published

on

Rhode Island shifts its primary to Wednesday, Sept. 9, easing a Labor Day poll setup crunch


PROVIDENCE, R.I. – Rhode Island’s primary elections will now be held on Wednesday, Sept. 9, moving it back from the typical Tuesday election day because it fell too close to Labor Day.

Gov. Dan McKee, a Democrat, signed off on the change earlier this week. The primary election had been scheduled for Sept. 8, which is the day after the holiday weekend.

State and local officials had requested the change after raising concerns about having enough time to set up polls for voters. However, under the legislation enacted, the filing deadlines will remain the same.

“We have to set up over 400 polling places around the state on the day before the election,” Nick Lima, the registrar and director of elections for the city of Cranston, told lawmakers at a hearing in January. “That’s very difficult to do on a holiday because many of our polls are schools, social halls and churches.”

Advertisement

It’s not unusual for states to change their election day. Lawmakers in neighboring Massachusetts changed the state’s 2026 primary election day from Sept. 15 to Sept. 1, arguing that doing so will help improve voter turnout.

Only four states hold their primary elections in September: Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Delaware, which has the latest primary date in the U.S., taking place this year on Sept. 15.

Legislation seeking to move up Delaware’s primary election by several months has been introduced in the statehouse, but previous attempts to do so have stalled.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

RI State Police investigating Cumberland crash

Published

on

RI State Police investigating Cumberland crash


CUMBERLAND, R.I. (WPRI) — Rhode Island State Police are investigating a crash that happened on I-295 North in Cumberland Tuesday night.

The crash happened in the right lane near Exit 22 just before 9 p.m.

It’s unclear exactly what caused the crash or if anyone was injured.

12 News has reached out to Rhode Island State Police for more information but has not heard back.

Advertisement

Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.

Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.

Follow us on social media:

 

 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending