New Hampshire
NH Supreme Court defends $50,000 payout to top Judicial Branch employee
Justices on the New Hampshire Supreme Court are defending an irregular personnel maneuver that allowed a top state court employee to collect nearly $50,000 in employment benefits following a layoff that lasted just 48 hours.
The sitting justices — with the exception of Justice Anna Barbara Hantz Marconi — issued a statement Thursday evening saying that Dianne Martin’s removal from her position as the top administrator of the state court system and subsequent hiring into a new role in the Judicial Branch two days later was in line with “standard personnel policies.”
Chief Justice Gordon MacDonald, along with Justices Patrick Donovan, Melissa Countway, and Bryan Gould, issued the statement in response to reporting by New Hampshire Public Radio that described how Martin was able to cash out her unused sick and vacation time before transitioning into her new position, a benefit other state government employees are typically not granted when moving between state jobs.
The state Judicial Branch had earlier declined to respond to a detailed list of questions NHPR sent prior to publication, or respond to a whistleblower’s allegations that MacDonald — who has a long professional relationship with Martin, including when she served as his chief of staff — helped orchestrate the payout.
Late Thursday, however, the justices issued a statement acknowledging “public interest” in the matter.
“The Court remains committed to responsible stewardship of public resources and to maintaining the effective administration of justice across the state,” the four justices wrote.
According to the statement, Martin was removed as director of the Administrative Office of the Courts on March 3 as part of a “reorganization” that called for the elimination of the position. The justices say that realignment was part of a cost-cutting review that began in early 2024.
On the same day Martin was removed from her position, however, the state Supreme Court announced an interim replacement for her in the role of director, calling into question the claim that the position was eliminated. In fact, the administrative director position would remain filled by Judge Chris Keating, Martin’s replacement, until mid-October — a full six months — when the Judicial Branch then formally announced the abolishment of the position. (Keating now holds the title of State Court Administrator, a job that assumes many of the responsibilities of the former administrative director, along with other new responsibilities.)
Justices defend handling of Martin’s transition
Internal personnel records obtained by NHPR showed that Martin was laid off on April 1 but was rehired into a new job as general counsel two days later. That brief gap in state employment cleared the way for Martin to cash out her unused sick and vacation time, which was valued at $43,548. She also received $6,307 in “termination pay,” based on her length of employment at the Judicial Branch.
The justices did not respond to a series of questions from NHPR on Friday about why Martin was laid off for two days, instead of directly transitioning into the new position. The statement from the court Thursday said that the New Hampshire Department of Administrative Services, which oversees personnel policies for other branches of government, “reviewed” the transaction. A lawyer for that agency did not respond to a request for comment on when that review took place, or if it raised any concerns about the transactions involving Martin.
When Martin was rehired by the Judicial Branch on April 4 into a new role overseeing applications to practice law in the state, the job was already filled by a veteran in-house legal counsel, Sherry Hieber. Hieber had previously informed the court about her plans to retire that summer. Martin and Hieber would simultaneously hold the position for five months, with each earning a salary of more than $154,000.
The position is funded entirely through bar admission and application fees, and doesn’t come out of the courts’ general fund budget, the justices said.
In defending the overlap, the justices said they “determined that Ms. Martin should work alongside her predecessor for several months before taking over as General Counsel so that she could absorb the institutional knowledge necessary to the execution of her responsibilities.”
The five-month overlap appears to violate the Judicial Branch’s own personnel rules, however, which state that any dual appointments to the same position cannot last longer than two weeks. A court spokesperson declined to respond Friday as to why the justices appear to have sidestepped their own rules.
The justices’ statement also did not address claims made by a whistleblower who said that moving Martin into the new position was the “chief’s idea,” an apparent reference to MacDonald. Handwritten notes obtained by NHPR through a public records request show that the whistleblower told a state official that “Dianne won’t accept the transfer because she wants the layoff payout $.”
Martin remains employed with the Judicial Branch as a general counsel, and reports directly to MacDonald.
Two of the state’s current five Supreme Court justices were not sitting on the bench when Martin’s job moves took place earlier this year. Gould, who signed onto Thursday’s statement from the court, was only confirmed to his seat on the bench in September, months after Martin’s change in jobs. Hantz Marconi, who did not sign Thursday’s statement, was on administrative leave from the bench earlier this year, as she faced criminal charges related to attempting to meddle into an investigation involving her husband, the state’s port director.
Earlier this week, Gov. Kelly Ayotte declined to comment on if she would support an investigation into the payments to Martin, saying it involved a separate branch of government. She did tell reporters, though, “that everyone in government, every branch, has to follow the laws and the rules. And so I want to make sure that happens.”
On Thursday, top New Hampshire House Republicans said that they were preparing to take action when they return to Concord early next year on a range of issues involving the judiciary.
“I think we’re going to see a number of cases come up over the next few months where the legislature uses our authority to hold the justices, the judicial branch, accountable,” said Rep. Joe Sweeney, the House’s deputy majority leader.
Sweeney declined to say which judicial officials or what conduct he sought to review.
“I think as we continue to uncover certain things that are happening behind the scenes, we’ll then come out with different plans for different judges,” he said.
New Hampshire
NH Lottery Powerball, Lucky For Life winning numbers for Jan. 7, 2026
The New Hampshire Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2026 results for each game:
Winning Powerball numbers from Jan. 7 drawing
15-28-57-58-63, Powerball: 23, Power Play: 2
Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Lucky For Life numbers from Jan. 7 drawing
05-14-15-21-39, Lucky Ball: 10
Check Lucky For Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 3 numbers from Jan. 7 drawing
Day: 1-5-7
Evening: 0-1-4
Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 4 numbers from Jan. 7 drawing
Day: 6-8-6-9
Evening: 7-8-6-6
Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Megabucks Plus numbers from Jan. 7 drawing
03-08-13-33-40, Megaball: 04
Check Megabucks Plus payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Gimme 5 numbers from Jan. 7 drawing
16-19-21-25-34
Check Gimme 5 payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
When are the New Hampshire Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 10:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Pick 3, 4: 1:10 p.m. and 6:55 p.m. daily.
- Mega Millions: 11:00 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
- Megabucks Plus: 7:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily.
- Gimme 5: 6:55 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Winning lottery numbers are sponsored by Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network.
Where can you buy lottery tickets?
Tickets can be purchased in person at gas stations, convenience stores and grocery stores. Some airport terminals may also sell lottery tickets.
You can also order tickets online through Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network, in these U.S. states and territories: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Washington D.C., and West Virginia. The Jackpocket app allows you to pick your lottery game and numbers, place your order, see your ticket and collect your winnings all using your phone or home computer.
Jackpocket is the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network. Gannett may earn revenue for audience referrals to Jackpocket services. GAMBLING PROBLEM? CALL 1-800-GAMBLER, Call 877-8-HOPENY/text HOPENY (467369) (NY). 18+ (19+ in NE, 21+ in AZ). Physically present where Jackpocket operates. Jackpocket is not affiliated with any State Lottery. Eligibility Restrictions apply. Void where prohibited. Terms: jackpocket.com/tos.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a New Hampshire managing editor. You can send feedback using this form.
New Hampshire
Civics 101: What’s happening with Venezuela?
On January 3, the United States military carried out what the administration called a “large-scale strike” in Caracas, Venezuela’s capital, amid several reported explosions and aerial bombardment.
Tune in to Civics 101 during Here & Now on Thursday, January 8 for a special edition breaking down one of the most unprecedented events in recent international affairs. This segment begins at 1:40 p.m. EST.
Listen to NHPR on your radio, stream us online, or just ask your smart speaker to “play NHPR.” You can also listen to this special episode of Civics 101 on demand.
In this episode, hosts Hannah McCarthy and Nick Capodice break down the history, context, and legality of what’s unfolding now — and what it could mean for Venezuela, the United States, and international law.
New Hampshire
Letters: Democratic gaslighting won’t save NH advantage
-
News1 week agoFor those who help the poor, 2025 goes down as a year of chaos
-
Detroit, MI4 days ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Dallas, TX3 days agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Detroit, MI1 week agoWith 46k outages around Michigan, Metro Detroit prepares for power loss
-
Southeast1 week agoMurder in small-town America: The crimes that tore quiet communities apart in 2025
-
Miami, FL1 week agoMiami-Dade sheriff’s deputy opens fire on vehicle after altercation during traffic stop, officials say
-
Technology2 days agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Midwest1 week agoMcDonald’s locks doors to keep out individuals who present ‘a risk’ in crime-ridden Minneapolis area