Related
Dallas, TX
Mailbag: Why waste offensive talent?
(Editor’s Note: Time to check the mail! The DallasCowboys.com staff writers answer your questions here in ‘Mailbag’ presented by Miller Lite.)
Is it more valuable for the Cowboys to hold their draft capital rather than use it to trade for a difference maker to create pressure and sacks? Why waist the offensive talent you have this year and hold on to the draft picks when it’s clear that Dallas has half a super bowl contending team? – Will Epler/Colorado Springs, CO
Patrik: I’ve made it no secret about where I stand on this topic: trade for one or two players to not waste this window of elite offensive play. You simply don’t know if Dak Prescott will equal or better this form in the years to come and, oh by the way, he’s already in his early 30s, and not in his mid-20s. Additionally, you can’t predict if George Pickens sticks around to keep the same level of weaponry surrounding Prescott, so forth and so on. Having shiny extra draft picks to use is fun, because of imagination. You get to imagine what might be and who they might select and, maybe, just maybe, that the pick turns out to be a Hall of Famer every … single … time. In reality, though, even for a team that drafts well, like the Cowboys, it’s still a crapshoot every … single … time. More picks are great fuel for draft show talks and mock drafts, but ask Dak Prescott if he gives an iota of a crap about any of that. Win now, while you have the quarterback and offense to do it, and stop pretending you have time to waste.
Dallas, TX
Dallas City Council examines Fair Park First funding and plans as contract considered
Dallas leaders are considering letting Fair Park First build a long-promised community park, with a new report from an advisory group and a briefing shedding light on the deal and where the project might lack clarity.
The nonprofit, Fair Park’s former manager, has more than $30 million in funding for the project but still needs a development agreement to construct the green space at the city-owned fairgrounds. Dallas City Council members are expected to consider the agreement Wednesday as millions in federal grant funding face a deadline.
Questions have swirled about whether Fair Park First is ready to deliver the park.
Everyone agrees that the promise to the South Dallas community should be fulfilled, council member Lorie Bair said Tuesday at a committee meeting reviewing the plan. She questioned whether the process was more important than delivering the park.
“I know that this has been a request that’s been a long time coming,” Blair said. “Can anyone here say that residents should not get what they’re looking for?”
Fair Park First has faced scrutiny since 2024, after nearly $6 million in misspent donor funds were disclosed. Last year, the city cut ties with the nonprofit and Oak View Group, Fair Park’s venue manager. The future of the community park project was left in limbo
A City Council committee was briefed on the new contract Tuesday. A decision on the agreement heads to the full council Wednesday.
Jason Brown, Fair Park First’s board chair, said that without a contract, Fair Park First has halted spending toward its next steps. More details would become available at the development’s next stage, he said. “We paused activity until we knew our fate,” Brown has said.
Task force review
The group reviewing Fair Park First recommended strong guardrails in a potential contract, according to its report.
The city’s Park Board president assembled the task force in December. In January, the City Council took oversight of the contract consideration from the Park Board as tensions grew over delays in the process.
The group’s report still went forward, finding that Fair Park First had advanced the project beyond the planning stage, with considerable work finished. The design and development stage of the park is complete.
Not everyone on the task force was convinced the nonprofit was ready to oversee construction. Ken Smith, president of the Revitalize South Dallas Coalition, said at the committee briefing that he wasn’t in favor of the consensus from the task force, adding that the group didn’t have important information needed to assess Fair Park First’s readiness.
“I don’t believe that we should make a recommendation,” Smith said.
The community park has been years in the making, part of a decades-long effort to repair damage after the city razed homes to build parking lots at Fair Park. More than six years of planning and community engagement have gone into the project, according to a presentation.
Following community input, the roughly 10-acre green space was to replace parking spaces at the fairgrounds near Exposition and South Fitzhugh avenues. It’s expected to include amenities such as playgrounds, picnic areas, a pavilion and fountain.
Task force findings
Fair Park First has demonstrated its fundraising prowess, but it struggles with the availability of financial information, the task force report said.
Members said they did not see a detailed source-by-source funding schedule. Details of the money that the nonprofit has on hand, versus the money donors pledged to give, are not fully documented.
The group also couldn’t get a clear sense of who would be in charge of what, although they noted the nonprofit was collaborating with experienced third-party vendors.
Alyssa Siffermann, interim executive director of Fair Park First, speaks during a presentation for a fundraising and development agreement at City Hall on Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2026, in Dallas.
Angela Piazza / Staff Photographer
Vana Hammond, a Park Board representative on the task force, said Fair Park First presented a robust narrative, but it wasn’t quite an action plan.
“If you asked very pointed questions, we didn’t get very solid answers,” Hammond said.
Mark Jones, a task force member and CEO of Bonton Farms, said the group focused on the current situation, rather than the history of the park and fairgrounds, looking to find a resolution.
“There’s so many things that they are not ready to do because they don’t have the agreement,” Jones said. “When you factor in how far along they are in the process, it’s kind of like: If this happens, then this can happen.”
Brown said some requests couldn’t be addressed because the project wasn’t in the right stage. If an agreement is signed, Brown said, Fair Park First would move to its construction documents phase, which would get more “into the weeds” with a detailed plan.
Fair Park First finances
Fair Park First is just over $7.5 million short of its goal of raising nearly $40.7 million for the community park, according to the briefing.
So far, $33.1 million has been raised, with the nonprofit hoping to close the gap after an agreement is signed. Of the funding, Fair Park First has about $19.8 million available, with $13.3 million spent, briefing documents show.
Much of Fair Park First’s funding is promised. Pledges are expected to be paid over multiple years, some contingent on specific stipulations, nonprofit leaders said.
Fair Park First leaders have said they have tightened governance since the misspent funds were disclosed. On Tuesday, council members asked how the nonprofit could stick to its timeline or remain accountable.
Adam Bazaldua, whose district includes the park, said the push for the project isn’t because of the organization constructing it and that he believed the agreement had adequate oversight and accountability.
“This is about the South Dallas community, who has continued to be promised a better quality of life, more amenities and things that people have been afforded in all parts of our city,” he said. “This is an amazing opportunity with such great momentum that the last thing I want to do is pull the rug out from under the work that’s being done in the community.”
Terms of an agreement
The city would own improvements made at the fairgrounds, according to the presentation. Fair Park First would be responsible for all permits and held to a set of deadlines in the park’s creation. The nonprofit would give briefings to City Council, and the city may appoint a nonvoting member to Fair Park First’s board for financial oversight, according to documents. Additionally, Fair Park First would allow a city audit.
Council member Kathy Stewart, who chairs the committee that reviewed Fair Park First’s deal, said the agreement is structured with layers of accountability.
“It’s a good agreement,” Stewart said. “It does hold.”
Hammond, a task force member, said she hopes City Council members use the group’s findings as a caution, adding that there will always be unknowns in a project of this size, but “taking that out of the equation, there are still some underlying concerns.”
“As long as the council knows that and makes that decision with their eyes wide open, I think we did our job,” Hammond said.
Jones, also on the task force, said he hopes there is more transparency added to the project, which involves the community.
“Based on who they are and what they think they can do, who the team is that they’ve assembled, I think they should be given a chance to build it or not build it,” Jones said.
Staff writer Devyani Chhetri contributed to this report.
This reporting is part of the Future of North Texas, a community-funded journalism initiative supported by the Commit Partnership, Communities Foundation of Texas, The Dallas Foundation, the Dallas Mavericks, the Dallas Regional Chamber, Deedie Rose, Lisa and Charles Siegel, the McCune-Losinger Family Fund, The Meadows Foundation, the Perot Foundation, the United Way of Metropolitan Dallas and the University of Texas at Dallas. The News retains full editorial control of this coverage.
Dallas, TX
A targeted approach to dredging White Rock Lake
The long wait for dredging White Rock Lake has been a source of frustration for Dallas residents. It should have been done years ago, but the city has been putting this task on the back burner.
Historically, removing sediment and other materials from the lake has been done about every two decades. But the last time was in 1998.
A full dredging of the lake, however, is a cost-prohibitive process in today’s dollars, estimated at between $53 million and $80 million, according to a 2020 feasibility study.
The sediment buildup is harmful to the overall health of the lake. Shallow waters make it unsafe for recreation, boating and sailing. White Rock Lake literally breathes life into Dallas; it is a vital community resource for our city. We need to get this dredging done.
The good news is that the city is rethinking its approach. Instead of taking on the entire lake all at once, it is moving forward with a targeted dredging strategy recommended by the project’s engineering consultant. This program would focus on specific areas with high sedimentation, and it will be scaled to the available budget. This is a pragmatic approach that could work.
Dallas has a pattern of delaying maintenance and operations, with its own City Hall as Exhibit A. It has been nearly three decades since sediment buildup was removed from the lake. The idea of making this a permanent program with phased dredging every five to seven years is something we can get behind. It would create a badly needed maintenance process.
The City Council recently approved a supplemental agreement expanding its engineering services contract with Freese and Nichols, the firm that has been providing design and engineering work on White Rock Lake since 2022. It will be tasked with identifying and prioritizing dredge areas based on available funding. But actual dredging would not begin before December 2028, when this design phase is completed.
The city has $2 million in federal funding for the design phase and voters approved up to $20 million as part of the 2024 bond package. Still, funding is insufficient for a full dredging of the lake.
Council member Paula Blackmon, who represents District 9, where White Rock Lake is located, told us she tried looking into federal and state funding to dredge the lake, but those efforts were unsuccessful. The reason is that White Rock Lake is a recreational lake. It is difficult to compete for funding with lakes that provide drinking water to communities struggling with drought, she told us.
Blackmon said this targeted dredging approach was ultimately forced by economics, but it makes sense in the long term. It is a sustainable method guided by data that will lead to improved maintenance.
We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here.
If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com
Dallas, TX
Cowboys Lay Out Clear Plan For Offseason, Draft Approach
The Dallas Cowboys sent a clear message to start the NFL offseason when they fired defensive coordinator Matt Eberflus and hired Philadelphia Eagles passing game coordinator and defensive backs coach Christian Parker to take over the unit.
Dallas filled the defensive staff with young, up-and-coming coaches around the league and let everyone know that an overhaul of the roster and a new scheme is coming to Big D.
With free agency around the corner and draft season heating up with the start of the Scouting Combine in Indianapolis, there is no question what the front office plans to do to spark a bounce-back season in 2026.
MORE: Dallas Cowboys’ Stephen Jones Confirms Major George Pickens News
When discussing how Dallas will approach the offseason and improve the roster through free agency and the NFL draft, Cowboys EVP Stephen Jones confirmed that the team has one main focus.
“We want to fix this defense,” Jones told reporters. “And we feel really good about the offensive side of the ball, now that we got Javonte (Williams) done, and we know that we’ll have George (Pickens) back.
“So we feel really good about that side of the ball. I think this is obvious, we’ve spent a lot of time on it already in the offseason, revamping the defensive coaching staff, and now we’ll take the next steps, which are to improve the personnel on that side of the ball.”
If the Cowboys are serious about improving on defense, it will be exciting to see what improvements the team decides to make.
After the disastrous 2025 campaign, it is clear that the team is in desperate need of the focus that the front office is committing to. Let’s just hope that it pays off.
MORE: Stephen Jones Discusses Cowboys Plans to ‘Bust the Budget’ in Offseason
Dallas Cowboys’ 2025 defensive rankings
Total Defense: The Dallas Cowboys ranked No. 30 in the league in total defense, allowing 377 total yards per game, including what is, unfortunately, a league-high 60 touchdowns.
Pass Defense: The Dallas Cowboys ranked dead last in the NFL in passing defense, No. 32, allowing 251.5 yards per game and 35 passing touchdowns, ranking as the second-most behind the New York Jets, who failed to get an interception in 2025.
Rush Defense: The Dallas Cowboys ranked No. 23 in the league, allowing 125.5 yards per game and a league-high 24 rushing touchdowns.
— Sign up for the Cowboys Daily Digest newsletter for more free coverage from Dallas Cowboys on SI —
-
Montana5 days ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Oklahoma7 days agoWildfires rage in Oklahoma as thousands urged to evacuate a small city
-
Education1 week agoVideo: Secret New York City Passage Linked to Underground Railroad
-
Technology3 days agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Louisiana2 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Politics1 week agoChicago-area teacher breaks silence after losing job over 2-word Facebook post supporting ICE: ‘Devastating’
-
Technology3 days agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making
-
Politics3 days agoOpenAI didn’t contact police despite employees flagging mass shooter’s concerning chatbot interactions: REPORT
