Connect with us

Nevada

Nevada is protected—for now—from machine-gun ruling

Published

on

Nevada is protected—for now—from machine-gun ruling


LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — Nevada residents won’t be receiving devices that allow semi-automatic rifles to fire at the rate of a fully automatic machine gun, thanks to a settlement worked out by the state’s lawyers.

But hundreds of other people across the country are eligible to receive so-called force reset triggers, under a lawsuit negotiated by the U.S. government and firearms manufacturers.

The move comes after an executive order from President Donald Trump prompted a review of the government’s regulation of firearms in general, and a reversal of the government’s position in two key cases.

Meanwhile, a lawsuit filed by 16 states, including Nevada, seeks to ban forced reset triggers using the reasoning the federal government formerly employed in its own legal actions.

Advertisement

“Especially coming from a state like Nevada, where we’ve experienced a mass shooting, we don’t want these forms of devices, predominantly because it’s against our law”, said Attorney General Aaron Ford. “But secondly, we have personal experience on these, what happens when these types of things are placed into the wrong hands.”

Fully automatic fire

A semi-automatic rifle, such as the Armalite Rifle 15, or AR-15, fires a single round every time the trigger is pressed. The trigger must be released for a new round to be inserted into the chamber.

But a forced reset trigger — sometimes called FRT — allows a weapon to fire rounds as long as the trigger is held down, similar to the operation of a military-style M4 or M16 rifle. In fully automatic mode, the weapon will continue firing until its magazine is empty.

The forced reset trigger is installed internally, and it may not be readily apparent to an observer that the weapon has been modified.

Fully automatic weapons are generally prohibited to civilians, as are devices that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire at fully automatic rates, under the National Firearms Act of 1934, the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986.

Advertisement

Banned in Nevada

After the deadly 1 October shooting in 2017, the Nevada Legislature banned so-called bump stocks, which are devices affixed externally to a rifle’s stock that use the recoil of the rifle to achieve continuous fire.

The perpetrator of 1 October used rifles equipped with bump stocks to rain gunfire on a crowd at the Route 91 Harvest music festival on the Las Vegas Strip.

Under Nevada law, passed in 2019, it’s illegal to import, sell or possess any device that “…materially increases the rate of fire of the semi-automatic firearm or approximates the action or rate of fire of a machine gun.”

That language applies equally to bump stocks as well as forced reset triggers.

And the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms and Tobacco formerly took the view that forced reset triggers were devices that turned semi-automatic rifles into illegal machine guns. Starting in 1975, the ATF classified devices similar to forced reset triggers as machine gun devices.

Advertisement

Changing stances

As of last summer, the ATF had taken possession of at least 11,884 forced reset trigger devices under its regulations and brought legal actions against their manufacturers.

In August 2023, however, gun rights groups and trigger makers sued the ATF, challenging the rules classifying the triggers as machine gun devices. A Texas federal judge agreed with the plaintiffs and ordered the AFT to stop enforcing its regulations and to return forced reset triggers to their previous owners, even in states where the law prohibited them, such as Nevada.

The government eventually said it would return the devices, but only in places where they were legal, an approach the gun makers objected to, saying the federal government could not be trusted with interpreting state laws.

On February 7, however, President Trump issued an executive order to protect Second Amendment rights, prompting a Justice Department review of all gun regulations. The AFT subsequently withdrew its lawsuits against the trigger makers and agreed to return all triggers previously seized from owners.

But lawyers representing Nevada and other states secured an agreement: no triggers would be returned to states where the law bans them. Ford said the deal would protect the state, at least temporarily, but that loopholes persist.

Advertisement

“We have said that they will not be shipped to Nevada,” said Ford. “But our borders are porous, intrastate borders are porous, to be sure. So a gun that’s delivered to Utah, or an FRT that’s delivered to Utah may very well find its way across the border into Mesquite or something. At the end of the day, these are very real issues that we have to address.”

Ford said he would make enforcement of gun laws — including possession or use of forced reset triggers — a priority for his office.

“It’s one of the highest levels of priority, because I’ve always supported common-sense gun safety measures that are going to keep the public safe, and that’s what this is about.”

That’s why Nevada is continuing as a plaintiff in the case State of New Jersey v. Bondi, which asks a court to find that the ATF’s old viewpoint — that forced reset triggers create machine guns out of regular semi-automatic rifles — is the law, and thus ban them nationwide.





Source link

Advertisement

Nevada

These were the biggest cities in Nevada 150 years ago

Published

on

These were the biggest cities in Nevada 150 years ago


After the completion of the 1860 census and the election of President Abraham Lincoln, America imploded. Eleven southern states seceded from the Union in 1861, instigating four bloody years of the Civil War and fundamentally altering the social history of the U.S. The estimates of deaths caused by the Civil War begin around 600,000, but some claim as many as 750,000 individuals died throughout the conflict.

With so many families looking for a new start after combat finally ended and approximately 4 million Black Americans emancipated from slavery, it was time for many Americans to look for a new home to put down roots. The obvious choice for many was to move west, where there was more land to buy, settle, and cultivate. Many traveled by covered wagon, spending months on the dusty trail. Others who could afford better accommodations took a 25-day ride by stagecoach. All of them picked new cities and towns to make their homes, spreading the U.S. population more evenly across different states and territories.

On May 10, 1869, the first transcontinental railroad route across the United States was completed, ushering in a new era of transportation. The project was completed ahead of schedule and under budget, though with the loss of many lives, including those of the many Irish and Chinese immigrants hired to work 12-hour days in the hot western sun. Riding by steam engine, passengers could cross the entire country in four days, enabling waves of Americans and immigrants to quickly occupy land that would otherwise take months to settle.

The years of Civil War reconstruction, coupled with wagon, stagecoach, and railroad passengers finding new lives across the U.S., made the urban development reflected in the 1870 census incredibly interesting. Stacker compiled a list of the biggest cities in Nevada from 150 years ago using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. By transcribing Table XXV of the Ninth Census of the U.S. it’s easy to explore what the urban landscape looked like less than a decade after the end of the Civil War as America healed and grew.

Advertisement

The largest city in Nevada ranked #297 among all cities nationwide in 1870. Keep reading to find out more about the historic metropolitan landscape in your home state or check out the data on your own on our site, GitHub, or data.world.

Waiters and waitresses pose for a group picture
Bettmann // Getty Images

#4. Carson City, Ormsby County

– Total population: 3,042 (#1,434 nationwide)

—- Male population: 2,313

—- Female population: 729

—- Child population, ages 5-18: 408

Horse and wagon outside general storeHorse and wagon outside general store
Minnesota Historical Society/Corbis via Getty Images

#3. Hamilton, White Pine County

– Total population: 3,913 (#845 nationwide)

—- Male population: 3,339

Advertisement

—- Female population: 574

—- Child population, ages 5-18: 296

Group of young women out for a trip in a horse drawn SurreyGroup of young women out for a trip in a horse drawn Surrey
Transcendental Graphics // Getty Images

#2. Gold Hill, Storey County

– Total population: 4,311 (#705 nationwide)

—- Male population: 3,139

—- Female population: 1,172

—- Child population, ages 5-18: 541

Advertisement
Man standing in door of ice cream parlorMan standing in door of ice cream parlor
Minnesota Historical Society/Corbis via Getty Images

#1. Virginia, Storey County

– Total population: 7,048 (#297 nationwide)

—- Male population: 4,725

—- Female population: 2,323

—- Child population, ages 5-18: 1,054



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Reno Arch tradition began 100 years ago this year

Published

on

Reno Arch tradition began 100 years ago this year


A version of this article originally published on Oct. 27, 2016.

Reno’s most photographed landmark, the Reno Arch, turned 90 last week. But not the kitschy, ’80s-tastic version now on Virginia Street. And not the one before that, now living in Willits, California. It is the modestly lit one, previously known as the Exposition Arch now on Lake Street, that marked the milestone.

It’s worth pausing for a moment to note that, yes, Reno raised three arches in less than 100 years. New metal sheathing and lights will soon update the current Reno Arch, too. Does that count as a new one? No. But maybe we can call it Reno Arch version 3.1.

Advertisement

As with most else in Reno, when people grew tired of one arch, another was built anew. The current arch was built hoping it might inject new life into a flagging downtown, and tourists still flock to it for photo opportunities.

In a city that’s seen so many newcomers, it’s worth revisiting the sometimes-ridiculous history of our iconic arches that welcome all to the Biggest Little City in the World.

Arch No. 1: Party like it’s 1926

In 1926, the Lincoln Highway and Victory Highway converged to create the current Highway 40. Reno became an important stop on the connection between East and West. So naturally, there needed to be an arch commemorating Nevada’s 1927 Transcontinental Highways Exposition.

The arch was constructed in San Francisco and shipped over the mountains to be erected on Virginia Street and Commercial Row.

Advertisement

At the time, it was a huge deal and an impressive arch. Marvin Branch, the sign maker’s foreman, said he built many arches but this one was “by far the most elaborate he has ever put up” because of its size and number of lights, according to an Oct. 20, 1926, article in the Nevada State Journal.

The arch ceremony brought in numerous politicians both state and national, but it also brought more than 1,500 Shriners from the Islam Temple of the Shrine in San Francisco. They were coming to Reno for their own event, but joined the festivities and provided a 150-foot-long illuminated dragon, dancers and several bands. To top it all off, the dedication coincided with the University of Nevada’s homecoming day.

Needless to say, the arch dedication turned into a huge series of parades and parties.

In fact, someone from Iowa wrote an epic account of the night in a letter to the Nevada State Journal almost 40 years later:

Advertisement
  • “The party lasted three days and three nights.
  • $30,000 worth of whiskey was consumed, all of it supplied free to the revelers
  • A Chief Wovoka of Pyramid Lake Tribe had several hundred of his braves performing ceremonial dances
  • Reno’s restaurant owners fed the crowd breakfast, lunch and dinner for three days running, absorbing the expense themselves
  • In addition to the better known movie stars of the era on hand, there were several hundred others of lesser stature who came in on a train chartered by Death Valley Scott.”

A reporter at the time could not corroborate this accounting. But he also could not deny it.

“I am at a loss to explain, if all this is accurate, just how the newspaper reporters of the day managed to miss it,” Frank Johnson wrote in 1964. “Even presuming they took part too freely in the $30,000 worth of free whiskey, it seems reasonable to assume at least ONE dedicated soul would have pulled himself together long enough to whip out a paragraph or two of grateful prose.

“On the other hand, if the description is not accurate, I am hard put to figure out why a gentleman in Iowa would bother to compile a set of circumstance which COULD fit in with Nevada’s background and mail it to the editor.”

Also strange was the fact that the Reno Evening Gazette published daily updates about the arch for weeks leading to its construction, then suddenly stopped writing anything about it for two days after the supposed parades and parties.

Perhaps the reporters were too hungover?

Gateway to the city

After the highway exposition, the Reno City Council decided to keep the arch as the city gateway. But no longer needing the exposition title, Mayor E. E. Roberts asked the city for a slogan.

Advertisement

Not being happy with any local ideas, he started a larger contest. G. A. Burns of Sacramento won the slogan contest in 1929 with his submission of “The Biggest Little City in the World.” He was awarded $100, which he donated to a Reno charity.

Interestingly, the slogan had already been in use for years. The first printed version of the slogan appeared in 1910 on flyers made for the Johnson-Jeffries boxing match.

Here are some of the non-winning slogans Reno could’ve been stuck with for eternity:

  • Reno, a City You’ll Like
  • Reno, the Best Out West
  • East or West Reno Serves Best
  • Reno, the West’s Highest Assay
  • Reno, Biggest Little Town on Earth
  • In Progressive Reno, Loiter, Linger, Locate

Arch No. 2: The centennial span

In 1963, casino managers from the Horseshoe Club, Nevada Club, Club Primadonna, Colony Club and Poor Pete’s wanted to replace the first arch with a new one to commemorate Washoe County and Nevada’s 100th birthday.

It was dedicated on New Year’s Eve. Then-Mayor Hugo Quilici pulled a fake slot machine arm to activate all the fireworks, balloons and the neon lights on the new arch.

As with the current arch, this one too, represented hope for Reno’s future vitality.

Advertisement

“It symbolized a new vitality in the community and in the downtown area,” Jud Allen, manager of the Reno Chamber of Commerce, was quoted in a 1964 Reno Evening Gazette article. “There has been so much new growth this year: new construction, facelifting and the new arch emphasizes this.”

Meanwhile, the old arch was moved to Idlewild Park to live out its days as a monument to old Reno. But six years later, a street-widening project forced it to move to Paradise Park in Sparks. And in 1988, it was taken down due to extreme metal fatigue, public safety and the high cost of repairs.

Arch No. 3: A New Hope

By the 1980s, the second arch was covered in pigeon droppings and “had lost its place as a meaningful symbol or centerpiece,” according to an article by Warren Lerude, former Reno Gazette Journal publisher.

The Biggest Little City Committee formed and raised funds for the current Reno Arch to replace the second arch. They also offered the original arch to the Smithsonian Institute.

Advertisement

“If they take it, I’ve got some historic old tires and coffee cans they ought to leap at,” Mark Crossman wrote to Reno Gazette Journal columnist Cory Farley in 1987. “Real slices of Americana.”

The Smithsonian Institute never replied. Reno moved on.

“On Aug. 8, 1987, 20,000 people gathered on Virginia Street,” Lerude wrote. “Dramatically, casino lights were turned off and a switch was thrown. Reno’s new arch announced its heritage and future simultaneously in a burst of light and color. The crowd roared.”

A procession of classic cars immediately paraded underneath it for the opening of Hot August Nights. And the arch was assigned an address: 255½ N. Virginia St.

Advertisement

Back in the public works yard, two other symbols of Reno’s future withered away.

Later that year, Lonnie Hammargren, former lieutenant governor of Nevada and guest star on “Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous” TV show, offered to buy the first arch for $1,000. He wanted it for his personal collection in Las Vegas and planned to install it in the backyard of one of his houses.

The Reno City Council put him off in hopes they could keep it in Reno.

A Reno businessman, Steven Mack, also offered $1,000 for the arch. His plans did not involve putting it in his backyard, but he presented no other specific plans to the council other than keeping it in Reno.

Advertisement

The council decided to put the arch up for bid for 30 days in case a local nonprofit or government entity would offer a better plan. No one bid. Both arches sat for another two years without attention from anyone until Willits decided it needed an arch.

Arch No. 2 (again): Gateway to the Redwoods

“My father told me when I was a little kid that Willits was the gateway to the Redwoods; the heart of Mendocino County,” resident Dusty Whitney told the RGJ. “And I was talking to someone about that on Main Street one day and the guy said, ‘Do you know the old Reno Arch is coming down, how about that?’ and I said, ‘Gee, how about that.’ “

Whitney wanted an arch for Willits. But unlike Hammargren and Mack, Whitney preferred the ’60s look of the second arch.

“I couldn’t think of a more wonderful greeting to people coming through our community other than this arch,” he said. 

Advertisement

Whitney wrote to the Reno City Council. He wanted a gateway to represent Willits’ position as entrance to the Redwood Forest, heart of Mendocino County and home to Frontier Days rodeo.

“I remember getting up at 5 a.m. to go to the Reno City Council meeting,” Whitney said. “That was a full-day situation. I remember the (Nevada Heritage) said not to let the arch go.”

The Nevada Heritage preservation group had made a last-minute $2,000 offer on the arch, but like the others before, had no specific plans for refurbishing or installing it somewhere.

The city attorney also said city property could not be disposed of by selling to private interests. Instead, cities must create an agreement to loan property to another public agency for public use.

That’s right, Willits has been “borrowing” the arch for 26 years.

Advertisement

The City Council voted to give the arch to Willits, with then-Mayor Pete Sferrazza voting nay.

“I suppose they could’ve put that one on Center Street, but the (original arch) was going to ruins,” Sferrazza told the RGJ. “We could’ve put that one up too and had three of them.”

Whitney and his team went to the public works yard and took Arch Two back that same day.

“When I first laid eyes on it, it was under three feet of snow in the city yard,” Whitney said. “It was taken apart and piled there. But I had seen old postcards so I knew what it looked like.”

Advertisement

When he returned home with the arch in tow, he realized his original plan to put it on a side street wasn’t grand enough. Instead, the second Reno Arch, now Willits Arch, belonged on Highway 101. But that created big problems: It was too small to span the road, it needed serious repairs, it needed to meet Cal-Trans standards and needed a new face.

It took Whitney five years to erect the Willits Arch. Between 1990 and 1995, he gathered the support of engineers, designers, Cal-Trans and numerous others who donated their time and skills to lengthen the arch, earthquake-proof it, design a modest face and finally stand it up over a state highway.

Many people spoke out against the Willits Arch before seeing it. They said a garish piece of Reno’s leftover glitz should not be erected in their fair city, according to 1995 articles in the Ukiah Daily Journal. The publisher of the Press Democrat was particularly scathing. Until she saw the arch.

“I have a 3-by-4-inch framed ad from the Press Democrat apologizing for their lack of vision on how this thing came out,” Whitney said. “How many times does a newspaper put out an ad thanking someone for their vision and admitting they’re wrong?”

What about the original arch?

Advertisement

The original Exposition Arch was getting a new life, too.

In 1994, a film company restored it for a four-day movie shoot on Fourth Street. Suddenly, Reno residents wanted their original arch back. The Holiday Hotel and city of Reno paid to restore and reinstall it on Lake Street in hopes it might draw tourists to the National Automobile Museum.

And so by the end of 1995, all three of Reno’s arches stood tall, proudly proclaiming “Reno, The Biggest Little City in the World” — oh, and “Willits, Gateway to the Redwoods, Heart of Mendocino County.”

Postscript: In 2018, the ‘80s-tastic third arch was refurbished, replacing the gold pillars and red neon with a more Nevada-appropriate silver and blue.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada police launch statewide DUI crackdown following Super Bowl weekend

Published

on

Nevada police launch statewide DUI crackdown following Super Bowl weekend


LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — North Las Vegas police are participating in a statewide impaired driving enforcement campaign that runs through February 22, targeting drivers and riders operating vehicles while under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or both.

The North Las Vegas Police Department is conducting saturated patrols as part of Nevada’s Joining Forces initiative, a multi-jurisdictional law enforcement program aimed at reducing preventable crashes, injuries and fatalities on local roadways.

WATCH | Nevada police launch statewide DUI crackdown following Super Bowl weekend

Advertisement

Nevada police launch statewide DUI crackdown following Super Bowl weekend

During the campaign, NLVPD officers will focus specifically on identifying impaired drivers and riders. Officials say impaired driving remains one of the most dangerous and preventable behaviors on Nevada roadways.

For families like Martina Suarez, the enforcement campaign carries deep personal meaning. Four months ago, her son Cristofer was struck and killed by an impaired driver while walking to school.

“There’s a lot of innocent people and a lot of the times which I feel like was my son’s case, people party all night, so you’re not even, you didn’t get drunk at 7 in the morning, you were drunk all night and there’s innocent people going to work. Walking to the bus stop. Kids like my son going to school and it’s not fair,” Suarez said.

Advertisement

KTNV

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, alcohol-impaired driving accounts for approximately one-third of all traffic fatalities in the United States. Even small amounts of alcohol or drugs can significantly impair judgment, reaction time, coordination and decision-making.

Drug-impaired driving including impairment from prescription medications, illegal drugs or cannabis also poses a serious and growing risk to roadway safety.

Police emphasize that impaired driving doesn’t only endanger the impaired driver or rider. It places passengers, other motorists, pedestrians, cyclists and first responders at risk every time someone chooses to get behind the wheel while impaired.

Nevada police launch statewide DUI crackdown following Super Bowl weekend

KTNV

Advertisement

The Joining Forces program is funded by the Nevada Office of Traffic Safety and supports agencies across Nevada in conducting targeted traffic enforcement. The campaign is part of Nevada’s Zero Fatalities initiative, an ongoing statewide effort to eliminate traffic-related deaths on Nevada roadways.

Officials urge drivers to plan ahead: designate a sober driver or use alternative transportation if impaired. The message is clear if you’re impaired, don’t drive.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending