Connect with us

Massachusetts

Mass. state lab struggles as Trump reshapes federal health funding – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Mass. state lab struggles as Trump reshapes federal health funding – The Boston Globe


Catherine Brown stood at the entrance to the TB lab.John Tlumacki/Globe Staff

The outcome was heralded for years as a victory for public health work. But earlier this month, Massachusetts officials received notification that the entire staff of the federal lab had been laid off, erasing a significant node in the nation’s network to identify and track public health threats, state officials said.

As the Trump administration reshapes how the federal government finances and communicates scientific findings, Massachusetts’ health laboratory is now at a crossroads, facing dramatic changes to its mandate and uncertainty over its future. The state is in a legal battle to protect nearly $84 million in federal funding the Trump administration is trying to claw back. Meanwhile, the state could face other significant additional cuts in Congress’ coming budget. While all of this is unfolding, the lab’s staff is struggling to figure out how to perform in-house work the feds used to reliably handle.

Congress’ budget could force some public health programs to shutter, but how widespread the cuts will be remains unknown, said Dr. Robbie Goldstein, the state’s public health commissioner.

Advertisement

“We can’t put anything on an untouchable list right now,” he said as he joined leading DPH staff on a recent visit to the lab building. “That’s not the happy answer the folks in this room wanted to hear.”

At stake, health officials said, is their ability to mount a well-informed, nimble response to public health challenges. Operating without the CDC’s full partnership is akin to being blindfolded.

“With their limited presence, we are limited in our understanding of what’s going on, even around us in our neighboring states,” said Nicolas Epie, the lab’s director.

The federal Department of Health and Human Services in a statement to the Globe described the layoffs and lab shutdowns as part of a streamlining effort that will ultimately strengthen the CDC.

Advertisement
The State Epidemiology Lab is undergoing renovations. John Tlumacki/Globe Staff

The Massachusetts Public Health Laboratory is the hub of the state’s public health work. Doctors, hospitals, and health officials statewide look to it for information about the germs, environmental contaminants, or food borne illnesses that might have made someone sick, how best to treat them, and what they mean for the health of the rest of the state. Each year, roughly 300,000 samples pass through the lab, tracking illnesses such as HIV, tuberculosis, avian flu, and COVID-19.

The lab is housed in a scaffolding-encased brutalist office tower in Jamaica Plain, where more than 400 epidemiologists, virologists, chemists, microbiologists and other workers help assemble microscopic clues into a coherent picture of the state of health in Massachusetts. During a visit to the lab in April, workers said they were trying to maintain a stoic focus despite the news from Washington.

“It doesn’t matter what’s going on in the country,” said Erika Buzby, a veteran microbiologist and supervisor of the 8th floor molecular biology lab. “We just have to keep going.”

Boston 04/11/2025 The State Epidemiology Lab could lose a significant amount of funding if the CDC grant withdrawals go through. Work goes on in the TB lab. John Tlumacki/Globe (metro)John Tlumacki/Globe Staff

One floor beneath, workers carried racks filled with dozens of samples for inspection in the sexually transmitted infections lab, the same one responsible for identifying the worrying gonorrhea infections. Next door, behind a door warning of biohazards, staff hunkered over counters to review the results of tuberculosis bacteria analysis. Cases of TB, a bacterial infection of the lungs, increased by 13 percent in Massachusetts in 2024 compared to the year before.

“Samples are coming from a lot of the hospitals all over the Commonwealth,” said Bernie Chirokas, director of sexually transmitted diseases and mycobacteriology.

Workers here raise their voices to be heard over the loud droning of air coolers that keeps machines operating smoothly.

Advertisement

“It’s the constant hum of public health,” said Goldstein. “What we’re nervous about is that we will be silenced here.”

Robert Goldstein, (left) Commissioner of the Department of Public Health looked along with Catherine Brown as Sanjib Bhattacharyya (right) spoke with a technician. John Tlumacki/Globe Staff

The $84 million for the lab is what remains from an almost $776 million CDC grant allocated in 2019 that was expected to last into 2026.

That money is supposed to help pay for data system modernization, supply stockpiles and upgraded equipment, a needed compliment to a multi-year renovation project nearing conclusion. Near the top of the wish list is a biosafety cabinet that protects staff from samples of infectious agents. The current cabinet is so old executives fear just moving it during the renovations could break it, putting workers at risk.

The lab’s grant makes up the bulk of the more than $105 million in CDC funding for Massachusetts public health services that is at risk, according to a DPH affidavit shared with the Globe. The Trump administration announced March 26 it intended to reclaim the money by April, saying it was no longer needed because the pandemic was over. It’s loss, though, would hobble programs supporting community health, children’s vaccinations, and addressing health disparities. Nearly $5 million for substance use programs from a different federal agency is also in jeopardy.

One example of the lab’s recent pivot toward self-sufficiency is a new viral genetic sequencing program to track how different strains of hepatitis C are spreading. It’s a service the CDC used to perform through another program kneecapped by layoffs this month, according to a notification state officials received from the CDC on April 3. Massachusetts set aside funding for the testing program well before Trump’s election in part, Goldstein said, because the state foresaw what another Trump presidency might mean for public health. President Trump and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who now leads HHS, had campaigned on promises to shake up public health institutions.

Advertisement

“We didn’t know which way the November election was going to go,” said Goldstein, who worked for the CDC before joining state government. “We had to prepare for what could be a very friendly environment for public health and continued investment, or a very hostile environment.”

Another attempt to replicate federal functions locally is a proposed program to recommend vaccinations for adults and a fund to help purchase them.

To be sure, Massachusetts health leaders acknowledge the state’s lab alone can’t fully replace federal public health resources. And there are challenges ahead without an established communication workflow between various health leaders across the nation to share intel and spread warnings.

Avian flu gets attention as a possible threat, but experts said a novel virus isn’t the only worry when it comes to what public health crises may lie ahead.

“It could be a food borne pathogen,” said Dr. Larry Madoff, medical director of the bureau of infectious disease and laboratory sciences. “It could be a mosquito borne pathogen.”

Advertisement

“I’m actually worried about the every day suspects,” said Catherine Brown, state epidemiologist and public heath veterinarian, “measles, or the increase of tuberculosis cases that we’re seeing, drug resistant gonorrhea, or the EEE (Eastern Equine Encephalitis) outbreaks that we have regularly in Massachusetts.”

Tackling an outbreak, whether a new virus or an old foe, without the resources and reach of some cancelled CDC programs is intimidating, said Epie, the lab’s director.

“The world is not as compartmentalized as it was before,” he said. “We cannot protect ourselves without ever knowing what’s going on in other countries as well.”


Jason Laughlin can be reached at jason.laughlin@globe.com. Follow him @jasmlaughlin.

Advertisement





Source link

Massachusetts

Measles exposure possible in Boston, Westborough, officials warn – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Measles exposure possible in Boston, Westborough, officials warn – The Boston Globe


The Massachusetts Department of Public Health is working with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and local partners to identify and notify those who may have been exposed, officials said.

“Measles is a highly contagious, airborne disease, which has increased significantly in the United States because of the unfortunate decrease in vaccination rates. It is also a preventable disease,” Public Health Commissioner Dr. Robbie Goldstein said in a statement. “This current situation serves as an important reminder of the critical role vaccination plays in protecting our communities.”

While Massachusetts has not had a measles case this year, the United States has seen the highest number of nationwide cases in more than a decade – nearly 2,000 in 44 jurisdictions, which included three confirmed deaths from measles, Goldstein said.

“Fifteen years ago, measles had been considered eliminated in the United States, but that tremendous progress is at risk,” Goldstein said. “Vaccines are one of the most important public health interventions ever – they are safe, effective, and lifesaving.”

Advertisement

Officials said the exposures may have occurred at Logan Airport Terminal B on Dec. 11 from 2:30 p.m. to 4:45 p.m.; at the DoubleTree hotel in Westborough from 3:30 p.m. on Dec. 11 to 9 p.m. on Dec. 12; and at Logan Airport Terminal C from 6 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on Dec. 12.

“Those who could have been exposed and begin to develop symptoms of measles should call their healthcare provider before visiting an office, clinic, or emergency department,” public health officials said in the statement. “Visiting a healthcare facility may put others at risk and should be avoided if possible.”

Those who have had measles in the past or have received two doses of the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine are unlikely to develop measles even if they were exposed, officials said.

Boston Public Health Commissioner Dr. Bisola Ojikutu also encouraged people to get vaccinated for measles.

“With multiple measles outbreaks across the country and increased travel around the holidays, now is an important time to ensure that you and your family are protected,” she said.

Advertisement

Ojikutu said two doses of MMR vaccine are 97 percent effective at preventing measles and provide protection against mumps and rubella. Children should receive the vaccine at 12-15 months of age and again before kindergarten, she said.

Children who are at least 6 months old and traveling internationally or to areas of the US with active outbreaks should receive an early dose of vaccine before traveling, Ojikutu said.

“It is never too late for children or adults to get the measles vaccine even if they are past the recommended age,” Ojikutu said.

Early symptoms of measles occur one to three weeks after exposure and may resemble a cold, with symptoms fever, cough, runny nose, and red eyes. A rash occurs on the skin two to four days after the initial symptoms develop and usually appears first on the head, officials said.

People with measles may be contagious up to four days before the rash appears and for four days after the rash starts, officials said.

Advertisement

State public health officials are urging anyone who has not been vaccinated or doesn’t know their measles immunization status to contact their healthcare provider to get vaccinated with at least one dose of the MMR vaccine.

“Measles vaccine given within 72 hours of exposure may prevent measles disease,” officials said in the statement. “Vaccination beyond this window will provide protection from subsequent exposures.”


Emily Sweeney can be reached at emily.sweeney@globe.com. Follow her @emilysweeney and on Instagram @emilysweeney22.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Circle Furniture closes all stores in Massachusetts and New Hampshire

Published

on

Circle Furniture closes all stores in Massachusetts and New Hampshire



Circle Furniture, which has eight locations in Massachusetts and New Hampshire, appears to have suddenly closed all of its stores right before Christmas.

“All Circle Furniture Locations are CLOSED Till Further Notice,” a message on the company website states. 

Circle Furniture has stores in Boston’s Seaport neighborhood, Acton, Cambridge, Framingham, Hyannis, Middleton, Pembroke and Portsmouth, New Hampshire, as well as a warehouse and outlet store in Acton. The Hyannis location had just opened in May.

Advertisement

The Boston Globe reported that employees found out about the closures on Friday via email.

“With a heavy heart, circumstance [sic] have gone against the business and we can no longer afford to continue operations, therefore all employees are being let go including your position effective Dec. 23,” the email reportedly stated.

The newspaper said the Acton-based furniture seller had about 65 employees. Companies with more than 50 employees are supposed to give 60 days notice before a mass layoff, but no Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN) filing from Circle Furniture had appeared on the state website as of Tuesday.

Circle Furniture on its website describes itself as “a family run business that has been around for almost 70 years.”

“We are dedicated to providing a wide selection of unique, quality furniture with a team of talented designers to help you every step of the way,” the company says. “Besides sourcing expertly crafted and beautiful furniture, we take strides to be an important part of the local community-both by working with local factories and supporting local charities.”

Advertisement

WBZ-TV has reached out to Circle Furniture for comment.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

The challenges and joys of being a Christmas tree farmer in Massachusetts

Published

on

The challenges and joys of being a Christmas tree farmer in Massachusetts


Local News

Christmas tree season is short, intense, and years in the making.

The MacNeill family are the new owners of River Wind Tree Farm in Lancaster, Massachusetts. (Photo by Susan Unger Snoonian Photography)

Christmas tree farmers across Massachusetts had their own kind of Black Friday this year. On Nov. 28, Governor Maura Healey dubbed the day “Green Friday,” a push to kick off the holiday season while spotlighting the state’s Christmas tree and nursery industries.

While shoppers elsewhere woke before dawn to map out traffic-free routes, scour deals, and stack lawn chairs in car trunks to claim a place in line, farmers were already in the thick of a different kind of rush — one that had been years in the making.

Advertisement

The Christmas tree season, after all, begins long before the holidays arrive. For Meagan MacNeill, the new co-owner of River Wind Tree Farm in Lancaster, this year marked her very first season in the business. And as it turned out, she was unprepared, she said.

Customers began gathering at 9 a.m., an hour before opening, eager to flood the fields and begin their search for the perfect tree. It was all-hands on deck for the MacNeills; Meagan assembled both her immediate and extended family to help out.

The season began and closed in a flash. They sold out of cut-your-own trees the very next day, on Saturday, Nov. 29, and of pre-cut trees two weekends later.

The one word Meagan used to describe the season? “Insanity,” she said without missing a beat.

“I think it’s a new Olympic sport, getting the biggest and best Christmas tree,” she added with a laugh.

Advertisement

The challenges

The MacNeills are one of 459 Christmas tree farms across the state, which operate on nearly 3,000 acres of land and contribute more than $4.5 million to the local economy every year.

Like MacNeill, many farmers sold out of trees quicker this year than in years past (particularly since before the pandemic), according to David Morin, the communications liaison and former president of the Massachusetts Christmas Tree Association. He also owns Arrowhead Acres in Uxbridge, a Christmas tree farm and wedding venue.

Pre-pandemic, he was open for four weekends: Thanksgiving weekend, plus the three following it. He doubled his sales in 2020 during the pandemic. Now, he’s struggling to meet demand with a lower inventory.

“I was lucky to make it through two weekends. I actually shut down early on the second weekend because I didn’t have enough trees,” he said. 

Valentina Encina, 6, dashes between trees while hiding from her family at Holiday Tree Farm in Topsfield, MA on December 6, 2025. (Craig F. Walker/Globe Staff)

It’s not just that individual farms are struggling to meet demand, but that the number of farms nationally are dwindling. Between 2002 and 2022, the number of farms growing Christmas trees fell by nearly 30%, down from more than 13,600 to about 10,000, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation, an agricultural organization.

Why are there fewer farms? Illan Kessler, who operates North Pole Xmas Trees, a wholesale grower in Colebrook, New Hampshire and choose-and-cut Noel’s Tree Farm in Litchfield, attributed the decline to farmers aging out of the industry. This, coupled with a lack of interest from the next generation to continue the business, means fewer farms.

Advertisement

“They get older, and then no one takes over, so there’s less and less tree farms,” he said.

It takes between seven and 10 years to grow a Christmas tree. Farmers are competing not just with national chains like Home Depot or Walmart — which “are super-influencers when it comes to price,” Kessler said — but also with artificial Christmas tree suppliers. 

“The artificial Christmas tree companies make so much revenue that they have a marketing budget that eclipses — at a magnitude of thousands-to-one — what real Christmas tree growers have to promote and market their own products,” Kessler added.

Jeff Taylor prepares a price tag for a Christmas tree on Windswept Mountains View Christmas Tree Farm in Richmond, New Hampshire November 19, 2025. (Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff)

Prices of trees have gone up this year compared to last too, driven by inflation and tariffs along with a dwindling labor force and increasing costs of seedlings and machinery, Kessler and Morin said.

Morin likened being a Christmas tree farmer to a “love-hate” relationship. 

“The week after you’ve sold the trees, you’re in love with them. But for the other 11 months of the year, if it isn’t gypsy moths or caterpillars or one kind of a bug or another, or lack of rain or too much rain, it’s a constant hassle,” he said.

Advertisement

But despite it all, they wouldn’t give it up for the world.

“It’s like a Hallmark movie,” said Kessler. “We love selling Christmas trees, and we are super grateful to be in this business. I feel so blessed. I love what I do,” he added.

Joy to the world

Meagan and Steven MacNeill had dreamed of owning a Christmas tree farm in Vermont when they were newlyweds, but life got in the way. Before becoming farmers, Meagan worked as a school counselor, and Steven worked as a pharmacist — a job he still holds full time, she said.

“I knew, for me in particular, the traditional kind of 9-to-5 job didn’t feel right,” she said. She started working at a garden center and volunteering at an alpaca farm in Harvard on Sundays to satisfy the itch to be outdoors working in nature. Her husband later joined her at the alpaca farm, and it became their Sunday morning tradition for almost two years.

The couple bought River Wind Tree Farm in June from the Wareck family, fulfilling their two-decades-old dream to be Christmas tree farmers. 

Advertisement

But it wasn’t the fairy tale they had dreamed it to be. From learning to identify the farm’s many tree varieties — including exotic Christmas trees such as Nordmann fir, Korean balsam, and noble fir — to navigating drought and pest pressures, the experience was as much a challenge as it was a labor of love for the MacNeill family.

“The way the season looked was kind of a crapshoot because we had no idea what we were doing,” Meagan laughed. “It’s been a big learning curve for us. We still have a ton to learn.”

The MacNeill family own River Wind Tree Farm in Lancaster, Massachusetts. (Photo by Susan Unger Snoonian Photography)

The MacNeills plan on adding alpacas to the farm next year, and are getting creative on keeping revenue flowing outside of the Christmas tree season by holding photoshoots at the farm.

Despite the arduous work, whirlwind season, years of preparation, and fierce competition, Meagan is grateful to be in the industry — and she’s not looking back.

For many Christmas tree farmers, herself included, the pull is hard to define. It’s rooted in community, tradition, and the simple joy of bringing people together for the holidays.

“It’s the joy of people coming to pick out their Christmas tree, and even having my family be a part of it,” Meagan said. “People coming out and just connecting to the land for a little while, or being with their family, and having these traditions that are not centered around electronics, but just being present. It’s so special.”

Advertisement

The Queue: holiday streaming edition





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending