Connect with us

Sports

Inside Mohamed Salah’s contract saga: Lawyer’s concerns, Saudi interest – and a deal that pleases everyone

Published

on

Inside Mohamed Salah’s contract saga: Lawyer’s concerns, Saudi interest – and a deal that pleases everyone

In the end, the news that Mohamed Salah will remain at Liverpool was delivered with a humorous tagline.

“More in than out,” read the message across the club’s social media pages at 8am on Friday, around 36 hours after reports in the forward’s homeland of Egypt first suggested he had agreed to extend his eight-year stay at Anfield.

It was a play on words, nodding to Salah’s comments in November when his future on Merseyside felt far more tenuous. The fact that he felt “more out than in” after scoring two crucial goals in a 3-2 come-from-behind win at Southampton that day was confirmation that the process of his contract negotiations has not exactly been smooth. Though Liverpool always felt confident a successful resolution would be reached, that scenario was not inevitable.

Now, however, the deal is done.

Advertisement

Salah has signed a two-year extension, with no breaks or release clauses, on terms very similar to the ones that almost certainly made him the second-highest-paid player in the Premier League behind Manchester City striker Erling Haaland. While his previous contract included a basic weekly salary of £350,000 ($480,000), when bonuses and performance-related incentives were taken into account, Salah’s package was worth far more. Including external commercial endorsements, some of which also had performance-related clauses, he earned up to £1million per week.

This new contract’s lucrative nature reflects Salah’s status and his ongoing excellence, even though he’ll turn 33 in June. After scoring 243 goals in 394 games, he is set to complete a decade’s service at Anfield.

Discussions on this latest deal have been a drawn-out process, rather than there being any breakthrough ‘moment’, and have taken nearly a year. The path has not been straightforward.

The Athletic has talked to figures with intimate knowledge of those negotiations, who spoke to us on condition of anonymity to protect relationships, to understand why they took so long, how both parties approached them and what ultimately clinched an agreement.

Advertisement

Ramy Abbas, the Colombian lawyer who is Salah’s long-time representative, does not like discussing sensitive matters on his phone. For him, it is convenient that services such as WhatsApp are banned from receiving or making calls in the United Arab Emirates, where he lives.

Though messages are permitted, hundreds of them are usually left unread on his accounts, many from potential commercial partners looking to work with his most famous client. A note on his WhatsApp profile warns: “Voice notes ignored. If you’re late, I will leave.”

Abbas is transactional, he likes efficiency and he prefers to meet in person.

When Liverpool signed Salah in the summer of 2017, their sporting director at the time, Michael Edwards, and chief scout Dave Fallows flew to Dubai out of respect for Abbas. They wanted to show him how keen they were to sign Salah from Roma.

Having arrived in the evening when it was already dark, they headed home to England a few hours later without ever taking their jumpers off. On that return journey, the pair joked they must be the only visitors to leave the Gulf resort without experiencing any sun on their backs.

Advertisement

That negotiation was relatively straightforward due to Salah’s enthusiasm for a return to the Premier League, where he felt he had much to prove having barely played during a previous spell with Chelsea.

When Liverpool’s new sporting director, Richard Hughes, picked up the phone to introduce himself to Abbas in July last year, however, there was much work to do.

Hughes had inherited significant challenges at Liverpool, starting with the recruitment of a manager/head coach to succeed Jurgen Klopp, who stepped down at the end of last season after almost nine years. Following the hiring of Feyenoord coach Arne Slot to fill that vacancy, Hughes moved on to player retention: as with Salah, there was only 11 months left on the contracts of the team’s captain, Virgil van Dijk, and his deputy, Trent Alexander-Arnold, the Liverpudlian local hero.

Alexander-Arnold’s case was different to the others in that he was in his mid-twenties, and had active interest from Real Madrid. Salah and Van Dijk were in their early thirties, and while still performing at an elite level, Liverpool were conscious that their previous contracts had been agreed when both were at the peak of their powers.

Advertisement

The mantra from Liverpool and the club’s owners at Fenway Sports Group (FSG) was the need to ignore the question of, ‘What looks like the right decision today?’, and rather frame it as, ‘What will look like the right decision in future?’.


Virgil van Dijk was also holding contract talks (Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

That first conversation between Hughes and Abbas was brief and casual, with the sporting director promising that he would be in touch again soon to discuss Salah’s future. Like Edwards and Fallows had years earlier, Hughes would subsequently travel to Dubai to see Abbas, going twice before the end of 2024.

The first meeting, in late September, was held in the bar of one of the city’s quieter restaurants but the discussion was again short and informal until Hughes asked Abbas whether Salah wanted to stay at Liverpool. Abbas told him that he did, but the sporting director flew back to the UK with Abbas concerned the club might not be willing to maintain his client’s level of remuneration.

Abbas was impressed by Hughes but was left asking himself whether Liverpool valued Salah quite as much as they used to. He wondered whether the lack of commitment represented a hostile act.

As far as Salah was concerned, he was operating at the same level as the best players on the planet and showing no signs of slowing up, despite a disappointing end to last season after sustaining a hamstring injury at the Africa Cup of Nations in January 2024. The goals and assists were flowing.

Advertisement

Salah and Abbas understood the player’s salary would be in line with what he might achieve in the future but they wanted to sustain his position as one of world football’s best-paid players.

Liverpool, for their part, maintain that a pay cut was never on the agenda and that they always wanted to keep Salah. They had no issue with Salah pushing for the best possible terms and FSG had, after all, sanctioned lucrative deals for players — including Salah — worth the investment. They were also conscious of the need to try to find common ground with Abbas before tabling a formal offer.

There was also an acknowledgement, however, that any deal could not run counter to FSG’s sustainable financial model and had to be in the best interests of the club. For Liverpool’s owners, this principle could not be sacrificed, regardless of how valuable Salah was to the team’s chances of on-pitch success.


Richard Hughes, Liverpool’s sporting director (John Powell/Liverpool FC via Getty Images)

Salah thought the best years of his career were still to come.

Until Manchester City’s Rodri won it at age 28 last year, Ballon d’Or winners over the previous decade had all been in their early to mid-thirties and he wasn’t turning 33 until June 2025. Salah believed that his goals fuelling a successful Liverpool side would allow him to follow legends such as Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, Luka Modric and Karim Benzema in winning that award, recognising the best footballer of the previous 12 months.

Advertisement

Hughes had travelled to that first meeting alone but Abbas wondered about Edwards’ involvement behind the scenes. Though he now officially worked for FSG, rather than the club, it was ultimately his responsibility to manage the budgets in the organisation’s football interests. Liverpool were not in financial distress. Though the club was expected to post a loss before tax for the 2023-24 season, it remained well within the limits for profit and sustainability rules (PSR) for the following campaign.

When Salah last renewed with Liverpool in July 2022, a deal that made him the highest-paid player in the club’s history, the contract was brokered and signed off by FSG president Mike Gordon. Julian Ward had succeeded Edwards as Liverpool’s sporting director but the meatier conversations were between Gordon and Abbas. That negotiation was a slog and Abbas and Salah both felt that the player’s future lay elsewhere just three weeks before an agreement was reached.

Abbas was unsure whether a resolution would have been found had Edwards led that process. He had brokered a complex package that was realistically achievable but, on a basic level, more lucrative than the figure suggested publicly. He was proud of the deal, realising that the club and their owners had extended themselves as far as they could to keep Salah, and even allowed the prestigious Harvard Business School in the United States to turn it into a case study.


Mohamed Salah signs his previous contract in 2022, along with Ramy Abbas (facing away from camera), and club officials Jonathan Bamber and Julian Ward (Nick Taylor/Liverpool FC via Getty Images)

The revelation that FSG had authorised a record-breaking deal to keep Liverpool’s star man meant it was more difficult for any of its critics to accuse it of being tight with money but it also suited the owners to keep the figures lower. If it was known that Salah was earning considerably more than some of his team-mates, there was a danger that Liverpool’s pay structure would spiral out of control.

FSG brought Edwards back into the organisation in March last year to try to re-establish a chain of command that existed at Liverpool before it became a manager-led operation under Klopp. The owners knew how ruthless Edwards could be. Yet beyond him and Hughes, Abbas could not shake the feeling that Gordon would also still be involved when it came to the final figures, if the negotiations ever got to that stage. FSG’s money was ultimately Gordon’s, and he would be the one signing off any deal.

Advertisement

In a second Dubai meeting between Abbas and Hughes in October, the conversation didn’t move on very far, with the lawyer concluding the discussion was light on meaningful content. It was his view that negotiations had not even really started. Abbas’ policy had always been to let the club make the first move, allowing him to see clearly how highly they valued his client. The lack of pace or urgency worried him.

Towards the end of November, Abbas did not know how much Liverpool were willing to pay Salah or how long they wanted him to stay. Though he was told there was an offer in the making, nothing happened. He was confident Liverpool would deliver on their promise eventually, but was increasingly beginning to think it would only be done to save face, allowing the club to claim they had tried to keep Salah — even though they knew the offer made to him would be rejected.

This explains why, on November 24, after he’d scored twice in the second half to inspire that win at Southampton, the player decided to speak to journalists about his future, telling them he was disappointed not to have received a new contract offer, before making his “more out than in” comments regarding the 2025-26 season.

Nothing that Salah says publicly is done without consideration. He is rarely impulsive and little is improvised. Initially, he planned to tell UK broadcaster Sky Sports about his frustrations but in the immediate post-match interview, he was not asked about his future. Outside the stadium, as he boarded the team bus, he asked print journalists whether they were willing to ask the difficult questions.

It was unusual to hear a player as private as Salah speak so openly. Yet on this occasion, he felt as though he was able to attack the situation because Abbas only represents him. Neither the player nor the lawyer had team-mates or other clients to think of at Liverpool.

Advertisement

Salah would subsequently receive criticism, notably from Sky Sports pundit Jamie Carragher, a former Liverpool defender, for speaking out. A comparison was drawn with Van Dijk, but Abbas had been told that the Dutchman had already received a contract offer while his client had not. Therefore, Salah had more of a reason to go public about his concerns.

Hughes had taken the view early on in the process that he had no desire to put anything relating to the contract talks in the public domain, reasoning that doing so would only cause issues for Salah (who he wanted to focus simply on scoring goals and winning games), new coach Slot or the team as a whole.

This often meant the club being subjected to ferocious criticism, particularly on social media, for seemingly allowing talks to drift and uncertainty to foment. A fan’s banner also appeared on the Kop during a match at Anfield, nodding to Salah’s ‘bow and arrow’ goal celebration, urging FSG: “He fires a bow, now give Mo his dough!”

Yet, for Hughes, it was deemed a price worth paying, even after the Southampton game when the temptation to become drawn into a public debate may have been acute. Following that banner’s advice would have been the antithesis of FSG’s principles.


A banner on the Kop encouraging FSG to finalise Salah’s new contract (Visionhaus/Getty Images)

Abbas was open-minded about the length of any new contract, despite some claims the issue was causing a dispute. If the offer was right, Salah was willing to extend his stay at Liverpool by only one year. Yet as November turned into December, both parties were not even at the numbers stage.

Advertisement

It was certainly in Liverpool’s interest to ensure Salah’s deal was the last one signed among the three players approaching free agency. If he were the first and his salary remained high, the representative of every other player at the club would have a figure to work from during their own contract negotiations. It was Abbas’ view that Salah was the star player and, just as Andriy Shevchenko (a striker) had earned more money than Paolo Maldini (a defender) at Milan decades earlier, so Salah deserved the more lucrative package.

With the focus swinging from Liverpool’s table-topping surge in the Premier League to Salah’s future after his words with reporters in Southampton, champions Manchester City were the team’s next opponents at Anfield the following Sunday — December 1. Earlier in the week, Abbas had flown into London’s Heathrow Airport, taking a meeting with a sponsor in Manchester before a night back in London, where he ate at one of his favourite Japanese restaurants. He travelled north again by train, arriving in Liverpool a few hours before kick-off and heading into a hospitality suite at the stadium without anyone from the media noticing him.

Though Hughes had contacted him about Salah’s comments the previous weekend, there was no summit with the sporting director. After watching the match, which Liverpool won 2-0, with Salah scoring the late clincher, Abbas flew back the next morning to Dubai via Manchester, no closer to knowing where his client’s future lay.


Abbas had earmarked the start of February as a cut-off point for any decision. That would leave a reasonable amount of time to try to find a resolution with Liverpool, or failing that, reach an agreement somewhere else.

Foreign clubs could not officially talk to Salah until January. Abbas was planning to spend the first month of 2025 broadening his client’s options but he knew that Salah’s priority was to re-sign with Liverpool. He was enjoying playing under Slot, and admired the head coach’s sense of superiority — he did not seem to mind embracing the expectations that fall upon the club.

Advertisement

Previously, Klopp liked to cast himself as the underdog but Slot was the opposite: Liverpool were a global superpower who should be winning trophies. Salah respected that attitude. Whereas Klopp had regularly complained about the demanding fixture schedule, Slot seemed to relish it. There were no excuses — it was all on the manager, the staff and the players to find solutions.

By Christmas, Liverpool were leading the Premier League by four points and also top of the reformatted Champions League table. Salah was convinced this was his and the club’s season of opportunity. Abbas, by comparison, believed success did not always lead to good sporting or business decisions. Win the league and it would be a much easier argument for Liverpool to then let Salah go, as the fan pressure might not be as significant.

This potentially left a curious dynamic: could it be true that the better Salah and Liverpool did, the weaker his chances of staying at Anfield beyond the summer of 2025 became? Salah wanted to play at the highest level for as long as possible. If Liverpool ended up winning the Premier League and Champions League, then anywhere else at that point was down as far as he was concerned.

At the turn of the year, this made the Saudi Pro League a low-probability destination. Though it was a league with mind-boggling resources, Saudi Arabia was also a developing country in football terms. Salah also loved living in England, where his family privacy was respected — he has a wife and two daughters who are well settled in the county of Cheshire, just south of Liverpool — and he could focus on his career. Would that be the same if he returned to the Middle East?

In the long-term, Abbas was interested in the United States but Major League Soccer did not make any approaches. While there was press speculation that Paris Saint-Germain were another option, in early January, the French club’s president Nasser Al-Khelaifi denied he was targeting the player.

Advertisement

By mid-January, the player’s sponsors were getting twitchy, keen to know where Salah’s future lay. Abbas did the maths about what a move to France would mean — Salah’s endorsements would take a serious hit because Ligue 1 does not have the same global visibility as the Premier League. This contributed to Abbas being more inclined towards a longer stay in England, preferably with Liverpool. Salah would not trash his legacy by joining a rival, which ruled out both Manchester City and neighbours United.

There was some intrigue about Chelsea, where he’d played for just over a year across 2014 and early 2015 and was considered a failure as he was first loaned to Fiorentina and fellow Italians Roma, then sold to the latter in August 2016. Salah felt as though he still had something to prove at Stamford Bridge, yet any deal to go back was reliant on Chelsea abandoning a transfer strategy that focuses on signing young players. Any move to another English club was also made more complicated by the fact none of them were legally allowed to negotiate with Salah until May.


Salah feels he has unfinished business with Chelsea (Richard Heathcote/Getty Images)

By the end of January, Salah had told his family that there was a chance they would have to uproot from their Cheshire home. For Abbas, there were now two clear options: stay at Liverpool, or, somewhat reluctantly, agree a deal with the only alternative that could satisfy his financial expectations.

That meant one of the Saudi Arabian clubs, most likely reigning champions Al Hilal in the capital, Riyadh, who had wanted him for their Club World Cup campaign this summer. Though Abbas had held talks with other clubs owned by the state Public Investment Fund (PIF), he was increasingly beginning to think that the interest in his client was a charm offensive by the country’s football powers to show how highly Salah was valued.

Abbas did not have an offer in writing but the numbers the Saudis were talking about would remove any concerns about sponsors and how they would react. His contacts in Saudi Arabia told him that if Salah wanted to move there, then an offer would come, though Abbas was mindful of what might happen if it became clear first that a new deal was not happening at Liverpool. Potentially, this would leave Salah exposed and suddenly he would be in a buyers’ market.

Advertisement

Of more significance, however, was what was happening closer to home.

By early December, Liverpool had finally made Salah an offer. Abbas’ fears were allayed and he considered it something to work from. He was happier now with the way things were going because of the regularity of the contact with the club.

Liverpool seemed more serious but Haaland’s nine-year contract at City, announced in the middle of January, had the potential to complicate things. What was he earning? Abbas understood that any deal for Salah would be much shorter but if Haaland was setting the rate for forwards, given Salah was outscoring him and playing for a team higher up the table, his wage ought to be competitive with what City were paying the Norwegian.


By now, speculation was reaching fever pitch, something Abbas found faintly amusing.

When it was suggested by local media on Merseyside at the end of January that he was flying in for talks, Abbas posted a picture on Instagram of the view from his home in Dubai.

Advertisement

Halfway across the world, Salah continued to hit landmarks: after scoring his 50th European goal for Liverpool on January 21 in a Champions League game against Lille, Slot spoke about his “elite mindset”. Back in Dubai, Abbas had dinner with his wife before watching that game at their apartment. Despite making progress, he and Liverpool remained some distance away from an agreement.

After January, however, Salah did his best to divert questions about his future.

In an interview with Sky, he insisted he did not know which club he was going to be playing for after this season, suggesting that if these were his final months at Liverpool, he did not want his memories of the period attached to any wrangling related to an impending exit. Instead, the focus would be on his and the club’s attempts to bring more trophies to Anfield.

The change of tactics was also a reflection of momentum shifting, with progress being made between Hughes and Abbas. On Valentine’s Day, Abbas was in a somewhat combative mood, posting on Instagram about too many social media users craving “attention and validation” from people they’ve never met, before switching to X, where he was rather more complimentary about Liverpool’s head coach, who he said was “excellent at his job” after taking the team seven points clear at the top of the Premier League.

Slot, meanwhile, was making it clear in interviews that he wanted Salah to stay, and the determination of the player to continue with Liverpool reflected the respect the Dutchman had gained during his debut season.

Advertisement

Arne Slot has struck up a good relationship with Salah (Alex Livesey/Getty Images)

Outside the club, many were baffled why all this was taking so long. Internally, Liverpool were relaxed about leaving any decision about Salah as late as possible.

They knew the retention of Salah would allow Liverpool to continue as the “destination club” they had become under Klopp, but they considered it smart practice to wait, as the team had settled into a rhythm, and this time gave Hughes and other club officials more of an opportunity to be sure the player was capable of maintaining his performances at age 33 and beyond.

The deal, when it was announced just before 8am on Friday UK time, involved images of Salah sitting on a throne beneath the Anfield floodlights at night. They had been taken the previous evening, when it was easier to get him in and out of the stadium without being seen.

For Liverpool, the announcement was a vindication of the work Hughes and Edwards have done behind the scenes, and of the impression made by Slot since his arrival last summer. The club feel the same will be true of Van Dijk, whose own two-year contract extension is also nearing confirmation.

Salah’s team-mates had long expected him to commit his future to Liverpool, not just because of his contribution this season, but because of the relationship he has struck up with Slot and how positive he has been about the head coach helping to elevate his game over course of this season. They have also been struck by how Salah has embraced the responsibility that comes with being part of the club’s leadership group and the support he gives to the younger players as a role model.

Advertisement

When the video was released on Friday morning, Abbas was back in Dubai. In some ways, dealing with him had been simple because only he acts on Salah’s behalf, and Salah is a footballer who does not have an entourage interfering in his affairs, unlike other players of his stature.

Abbas has no emotional connection as to where Salah plays his football — for him, it is simply a case of getting the best deal for his client, and he knows Liverpool are good for business.

But Salah was desperate to stay, as were his family. In the video released by LFCTV, he spoke about how his daughter Makkah was “the happiest one in the family” when he told the family he was staying because she didn’t want to move away from her school and friends.

Despite some difficulties, the dialogue between Abbas and Hughes was respectful, helping them extend a relationship that, until this point, has worked out handsomely for everyone.

Additional reporting: James Pearce

Advertisement

(Top photo: Carl Recine/Getty Images; design: Eamonn Dalton)

Sports

Florida AG launches civil rights investigation into MLB’s warning to Christian pitchers over Pride Night caps

Published

on

Florida AG launches civil rights investigation into MLB’s warning to Christian pitchers over Pride Night caps

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The attorneys general from Missouri and Florida have reacted strongly to the controversy stirred when Major League Baseball warned three San Francisco Giants players about inscribing a Bible verse on their Pride Night caps, and that reaction includes MLB being served with a subpoena that signals the launch of an official investigation.

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier launched his investigation on Friday by serving MLB with a subpoena to investigate whether it is violating the civil rights of players based on their religious beliefs.

The general purpose and scope of Florida’s investigation “extend(s) to possible civil rights and deceptive and unfair trade practices violations in matters of employment concerning the business practices, policies, and procedures of Major League Baseball,” per the subpoena obtained by Fox News Digital.

In a letter from Uthmeier to MLB Commissioner Robert Manfred, the AG warns that “a pattern or practice of selectively enforcing its rules to benefit favored secular beliefs over disfavored religious beliefs would not only potentially violate Florida civil rights law, but it would also violate the League’s own policies.

Advertisement

MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL FACES BACKLASH FOR ITS STANCE ON CHRISTIANS WRITING BIBLE VERSES ON PRIDE CAPS

“And a practice of claiming not to discriminate based on religion while discriminating based on religion could further amount to an unfair or deceptive trade practice in violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.”

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier speaks at a news conference in Orlando on July 15, 2025, where he said U.S. Masters Swimming should not allow transgender athletes to compete against women swimmers or face legal action. Advocates Cassidy Carlisle and Lainey Armistead also attended. (Rich Pope/Orlando Sentinel/Tribune News Service)

Uthmeier is particularly troubled by the fact MLB said its warning had nothing to do with the players’ religious beliefs but rather was strictly because of a violation of the league’s uniform code.

It should be noted MLB said in a follow-up statement to its initial warning to the players that it was merely enforcing its uniform codes and the warning had nothing to do with Giants pitchers Landen Roupp, JT Brubaker and Ryan Walker writing a Bible verse on the team’s Pride Night Cap most of the other players wore.

Advertisement

MLB ACCUSED OF ‘DOUBLE STANDARD’ AFTER CALLING OUT PLAYERS’ BIBLE MESSAGES DESPITE BACKING BLM IN 2020

Uthmeier noted that doesn’t ring true and presented in his letter a handful of examples where MLB has been absolutely fine with players adding to their uniform.

“In 2019, for example, a Cincinnati Reds player wrote on his cap in tribute to a nearby mass shooting,” Uthmeier wrote to Manfred. “And in 2020, MLB evidently added new, sweeping exceptions to its uniform rules by allowing players to ‘support social justice and diversity and inclusion.’ These policy changes included permitting players to add Black Lives Matter patches to their sleeves.

“MLB therefore appears to applaud — even change its rules for — the ideological beliefs it prefers, but targets players who express religious views the League doesn’t like.”

Commissioner of Major League Baseball Robert D. Manfred Jr. speaks at the 2024 MLB Draft presented by Nike at Cowtown Coliseum in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 14, 2024. (Daniel Shirey/MLB Photos via Getty Images)

Advertisement

The Florida subpoena, issued under the Florida Civil Rights Act, demands action from MLB on July 23, 2026, at 9 a.m.. At that time, MLB must deliver to the AG’s office documents including:

  • All documents concerning how MLB characterized or classified the June 2026 cap writing, including, for example, whether MLB treated it as religious expression, political messaging, protest, or a violation unrelated to its content.
  • All documents concerning what prompted MLB’s review of and warning regarding the June 2026 cap writing, including any complaint, media inquiry, internal escalation, or third-party communication received before the warning issued, and the timing of each relative to the warning.
  • All documents concerning the actual June 2026 warnings issued by the MLB to any club.
  • All documents, including drafts and internal deliberations, concerning MLB’s decision to issue and publicly announce the June 2026 warnings, and any analysis of whether doing so adhered to the Code or with MLB’s treatment of comparable non-religious expression.

San Francisco Giants pitcher Landen Roupp wrote “Genesis 9:12-16” on his Pride-Night themed hat. (Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images)

Uthmeier is thus joining Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway, who recently wrote a letter to Manfred asking the commissioner to confirm that no player who has chosen to refrain from “wearing Pride Month paraphernalia or included Bible verses on Pride Month hats” will not be disciplined in any way.

Hanaway’s letter states that if Manfred fails to answer by June 25 or does not confirm that no discipline will be levied, she too will open an investigation of MLB.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The two attorneys general have authority over their individual states. But it affects four MLB teams.

Advertisement

Florida is home to two MLB teams — the Tampa Bay Rays and Miami Marlins — while Missouri is home to the St. Louis Cardinals and Kansas City Royals.

FOLLOW ARMANDO SALGUERO ON X: @ARMANDOSALGUERO

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Commentary: Why MLB’s Pride Night cap condemnation isn’t the anti-Christian crackdown conservatives claim

Published

on

Commentary: Why MLB’s Pride Night cap condemnation isn’t the anti-Christian crackdown conservatives claim

Amid the first days of grief after Alex Vesia and his wife lost their newborn daughter last fall, Vesia noticed something as he watched the World Series on television. He paused the broadcast, then checked the video, then texted another player to make sure.

51.

Dodgers teammates wore his number on their caps. So did players from the Toronto Blue Jays.

“It was awesome,” Vesia said. “It was a very heartwarming moment.”

Moving.

Advertisement

Touching.

And, under baseball’s rules, illegal.

Who knew, really, until this week? Three pitchers from the San Francisco Giants wrote the name of a Bible verse on their Pride Night caps and, amid an uproar, Major League Baseball said it had warned the players that “writing of any kind, with any message” on any playing apparel is not permitted. The issue, the league said in a statement, was not what they wrote on their caps but simply that they wrote on them at all.

Said MLB in the statement: “We have given the same warning numerous times in the past to players for messages such as ‘Dad’, ‘Happy Mother’s Day, I Love Mom’ and names of family members.”

To its credit, the league did not enforce the rule when Vesia’s number started appearing on caps in the World Series. But, if you’re going to draw a line on enforcement, where should you draw it?

Advertisement

In San Francisco, the actions of the Giants’ pitchers were widely condemned.

“They were in for a rude awakening with the response, and it wasn’t just from the gay community,” Giants broadcaster and former pitcher Mike Krukow told KNBR, the team’s flagship radio station. “It was from the Northern California community that supports the gay community.”

In response to media inquiries, and as first reported by Outsports, MLB confirmed it had warned the three players. I asked the league whether warnings had been issued in two other instances in which players had written on their caps, including Clayton Kershaw last year writing the same Bible verse on his Pride Night cap that the Giants’ pitchers wrote this year. MLB declined to comment.

“I got chastised by the league when I put Charlie [Kirk]’s name on my hat last year, because a man was murdered in cold blood,” Dodgers pitcher Blake Treinen told me, “and now these gentlemen who are relievers in San Francisco are getting chastised by the league for putting a Bible verse on their hat. It’s crazy to me.”

Treinen said league officials had told him the rule is strictly enforced.

Advertisement

“I straight up asked Clayton last year, ‘Did they call you when you put that on your hat?’” Treinen said. “He said, ‘No.’”

The Pride caps feature team logos decorated in the colors of the rainbow, a symbol long associated with the gay community. In the Bible verse cited by the pitchers (Genesis 9:12-16), the rainbow represents “the everlasting covenant between God and all living creatures.”

That the league would warn players against writing a Bible verse on their caps ignited a wave of conservative outrage, from Vice President JD Vance to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.

Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley fired off a letter to MLB commissioner Rob Manfred, alleging apparent discrimination “against baseball players who profess their Christian faith” and threatening the league’s antitrust exemption. Assistant U.S. Atty. Gen. Harmeet Dhillon said on national television that players might be able to file a claim for employment discrimination.

That is complete nonsense. This is what you want: When employees raise an issue to their employer, the employer listens and addresses their concerns.

Advertisement

In 2023, the year after five Tampa Bay Rays players declined to wear rainbow logos for Pride Night, Manfred said the league would no longer compel players to do so.

“We have told teams, in terms of actual uniforms, hats, bases that we don’t think putting logos on them is a good idea just because of the desire to protect players: not putting them in a position of doing something that may make them uncomfortable because of their personal views,” Manfred said then.

Teammates congratulate Freddie Freeman after his walk-off home run gave the Dodgers a 1-0 win on June 5, when the Dodgers held their annual Pride Night. Blake Treinen, the winning pitcher that night, elected to wear his regular Dodgers cap instead of the Pride version.

(Katelyn Mulcahy / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Manfred said the Pride Night celebrations could go on, however a team wished to stage them — or not, in the case of the Texas Rangers, the only one of the 30 MLB teams that declines to hold a Pride Night. And the league still sells Pride gear on its website for all teams, including the Rangers.

In the cases of the Giants and Dodgers, MLB grandfathered each team’s long-running use of a rainbow logo on the cap, with this accommodation to players: If you don’t feel comfortable wearing the Pride cap, just wear your regular cap.

That is what Treinen and outfielder Alex Call did when the Dodgers celebrated Pride Night. That is also what a fourth Giants pitcher did.

“My job is to abide by the rules,” Treinen said. “Ultimately, the only rule we have is to wear our team-issued uniform. So that’s what I chose to do.”

To Treinen, the decision over whether to wear a Pride cap is not about passing judgment on anyone else but about what he sees as the push “to force something on people that you know that is controversial to their faith — and, in fact, straight up against their faith.”

Advertisement

He expressed his support for the Giants pitchers.

“Kudos to those men over there who are standing strong in their faith,” he said. “It’s a sad thing to corner someone and try to make them feel bad about their convictions.”

I respect Treinen for explaining his viewpoint. To me, wearing a Pride cap for one night does not diminish your faith at all. It might sharpen your convictions. More important, it signals a welcome to everyone in the community that buys the tickets and broadcast subscriptions that help pay your salary.

“I think a few people made it about themselves and not about the community,” San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie told the Bay Area Reporter.

We always proclaim the life lessons of sports. One of them: Sometimes you have to put the team’s interests ahead of your own.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

2026 World Cup Odds: How Far Can Mexico Go After Winning Group A?

Published

on

2026 World Cup Odds: How Far Can Mexico Go After Winning Group A?

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

After its massive 1-0 win over South Korea on Thursday night, Mexico has won Group A and officially clinched a spot in the knockout round. 

El Tri will play its Round of 32 game in Mexico City, and will face the third-place finisher in either Group C/E/F/H/I.

This is the fourth time that Mexico has topped the group stage of a World Cup, with the other three coming in 1986, 1994 and 2002. 

With the win, Mexico remains unbeaten in World Cup group games at home, going a combined 6-2-0 (W-D-L), with two wins and a draw in 1970 and 1986, and now two wins in 2026. 

Advertisement

Before the tournament began, Mexico was listed at +6500 to win the World Cup. Now, after winning its first two games of the tournament, Mexico has surged up the oddsboard to +5000. 

Can Mexico build off its first two matches and make a deep run in this tournament? Let’s check out the updated odds for El Tri as of June 19.

This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX Sports may be compensated. Read more about Sports Betting on FOX Sports.

Team Mexico — Stage of Elimination

Last 32: +125 (bet $10 to win $22.50 total)
Last 16: +135 (bet $10 to win $23.50 total)
Quarterfinals: +600 (bet $10 to win $70 total)
Semifinals: +1600 (bet $10 to win $170 total)
Runner-up: +3000 (bet $10 to win $310 total)
Outright winner: +5000 (bet $10 to win $510 total)

Advertisement

Mexico is currently +5000 to win the 2026 FIFA World Cup after winning Group A (Getty Images).

Mexico’s Past World Cup Results:

1930: Group stage
1934: Did not qualify
1938: Withdrew
1950: Group stage
1954: Group stage
1958: Group stage
1962: Group stage
1966: Group stage
1970: Quarterfinals
1974: Did not qualify
1978: Group stage
1982: Did not qualify
1986: Quarterfinals
1990: Banned
1994: Round of 16
1998: Round of 16
2002: Round of 16
2006: Round of 16
2010: Round of 16
2014: Round of 16
2018: Round of 16
2022: Group stage
2026: TBD

What to know: Mexico has made a habit of being in the running, but never really being in the running. Make sense? Consider this: El Tri made it out of the group stage in seven consecutive World Cups (1994-2018), but never made it past the Round of 16 in any of those years. In 2022, Mexico failed to make it out of the group stage, and it will look to get back to its winning ways in 2026 after a great start to the tournament. With its win Thursday night, Mexico has now advanced to the knockout stage in eight of the last nine World Cups. It is important to note, however, that Mexico has never made it past the quarterfinals at a FIFA men’s World Cup.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending