Connect with us

Alaska

How additional NOAA layoffs could affect Alaska weather forecasts

Published

on

How additional NOAA layoffs could affect Alaska weather forecasts


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – There is concern among the weather community about the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) weather resources and whether they would remain intact if there were additional layoffs or service cuts within the National Weather Service (NWS).

Regardless of where weather forecasts come from, they all rely on data from the NOAA’s National Weather Service.

Meteorologists, including those at Alaska’s News Source, use observations from NWS weather stations, NOAA-provided satellites, radar, and global computer models to make daily forecasts. The NWS is also responsible for providing all lifesaving weather alerts when severe weather is forecasted.

Since January, nearly 25% of NOAA employees have been laid off.

Advertisement

Some federal employees have been “reinstated” following federal court orders, but remain on paid leave.

Some Alaska communities have already had services reduced.

The NWS announced last month that it would indefinitely suspend weather balloon launches in Kotzebue due to staffing shortages. Those launches collected critical data, including temperatures, humidity, and pressure.

The NWS declined an interview and was unable to provide the number of Alaska employees who had been terminated.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Alaska

Alaska school maintenance backlog has reached a crisis, students and school boards tell lawmakers

Published

on

Alaska school maintenance backlog has reached a crisis, students and school boards tell lawmakers


Students and school officials from across Alaska visited the Legislature — from the North Slope, to the Yukon Flats, to Yakutat and Hoonah — to make what has become an annual plea to lawmakers to invest in the state’s public education.

“I have been in this building every February for 20 years, and for 20 years I have been saying nearly the same exact thing, and we’re at a point now where that conversation is at an inflection point, ” said Lon Garrison, executive director of the Association of Alaska School Boards, which organizes the annual fly-in event on Monday.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Lawmakers skeptical as developer of Alaska LNG megaproject sets rapid construction timeline

Published

on

Lawmakers skeptical as developer of Alaska LNG megaproject sets rapid construction timeline


Senators, from left, Bill Wielechowski, Cathy Giessel, Gary Stevens and Bert Stedman respond to questions after the governor’s State of the State speech on Jan. 22, 2026. (Marc Lester / ADN)

JUNEAU — The developer of the giant Alaska LNG project is telling federal regulators that it expects to begin construction in April, as part of a plan to build construction camps, access roads and close to 100 bridge crossings to support pipeline construction.

It’s part of Glenfarne’s ambitious schedule to start laying the steel pipe for the 800-mile gas line by the end of this year.

Some Alaska lawmakers are skeptical the work can happen by then, if at all.

Glenfarne has not announced a final investment decision to build the project, though it’s expected to cost at least $44 billion. That longtime cost estimate has recently been updated, but Glenfarne has said it won’t publicly release that information.

Advertisement

Glenfarne last month announced that it had signed several preliminary deals with gas producers and gas line builders, atop other preliminary deals with potential gas buyers. The agreements are nonbinding, but are viewed as key steps that could one day lead to binding agreements.

[Alaska LNG says it expects to start laying pipe as early as December]

Alaska lawmakers who are increasingly focused on the proposed project say they believe Glenfarne still needs to take important steps that could delay the project.

They say Glenfarne has not sought any support from the Legislature for Alaska LNG, though the company said in a statement Wednesday that it is pursuing “property tax reforms” with state and local leaders.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy, a project supporter, has said he plans to introduce a bill that would reduce the state’s oil and gas property taxes by 90% to assist the project.

Advertisement

A consultant for the Alaska Legislature, GaffneyCline, has said a property tax reduction could save the developer important money up front while additional state benefits that provide the project with “fiscal stability” may also be needed from the Legislature. GaffneyCline is a subsidiary of oil field service giant Baker Hughes, which has said it plans to provide equipment for the project and make a “strategic investment” in it.

Major questions for the project include: Who will pay for it? What steps must the Legislature take to support it? And when will binding contracts with gas buyers and suppliers be signed?

Senate Majority Leader Cathy Giessel, a Republican, said she doesn’t believe Glenfarne will keep to its schedule.

Glenfarne’s target of laying pipe by year’s end “is completely unrealistic,” she said told reporters Tuesday.

One hurdle the company has yet to pursue is certification from the Regulatory Commission of Alaska of its financial and managerial fitness, Giessel told reporters. That takes six months, she said.

Advertisement

The company also hasn’t provided the Legislature with any fiscal information that would help lawmakers understand more about the project, she said.

“There’s a lot more to know,” she said.

“I’m not even sure they can come to a final investment decision, in light of the fact that we haven’t even determined what our tax structure will be for this project,” she said.

Glenfarne’s filing, made with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission last week, does not represent a final schedule, said Tim Fitzpatrick, a spokesperson for Glenfarne, in an email Wednesday.

Rather, it shows how “early works” — initial construction — will be sequenced, he said.

Advertisement

He said the project is moving toward a final investment decision. That had originally been expected late last year.

Fitzpatrick also said Glenfarne faces no financial-fitness certification requirement before the Regulatory Commission of Alaska.

“Alaska LNG is a FERC-regulated project so this RCA certification requirement is not applicable in this instance and as such has no bearing on Alaska LNG’s schedule,” Fitzpatrick said.

“Pending FERC authorization, we are moving forward with Early Works on a pace that will enable Alaska LNG to rapidly deliver reliable, affordable energy to Alaskans,” he said.

Tons of bridges and access roads

In its first phase, Alaska LNG would deliver North Slope natural gas to Railbelt Alaskans through an 800-mile pipeline, if it’s built. The cost has been estimated at $11 billion.

Advertisement

The final, more expensive phase would include construction of a plant and marine terminal in Nikiski, where gas can be super-chilled into liquefied natural gas, or LNG, for shipment to Asian markets.

The state of Alaska, through its Alaska Gasline Development Corp., is a 25% partner in the project. The state will also have the option to invest up to 25% in the project’s major facilities, each of which will cost several billion dollars.

Glenfarne, based in New York, disclosed its pipe-laying plans last month.

The filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission provides new details about more immediate plans.

The company said construction for “early works” will start April 15, the filing shows.

Advertisement

Those activities include installation of 20 main construction camps and 46 sites to store pipes.

They include 98 bridge crossings that are up to 90 feet long, along with six specialized bridges.

Temporary and permanent access roads must also be built from ice and “granular fill material,” which can include sand or gravel.

Early construction includes 619 segments of access road, the filing says.

The information required to support the early activities will be filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on March 15, in an effort to obtain authorization, the filing says.

Advertisement

Sen. Elvi Gray-Jackson, a Democrat and chair of the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee, said she hasn’t heard of any support the Legislature might be asked to provide, if any, to support those early activities.

“With respect to man camps or access roads, I’m not aware of any requests from Glenfarne for any state support,” she said in an interview Tuesday.

“A lot of what they’re doing has been so secret and confidential,” she said.

She’s cautiously optimistic the project can be built, but she said she doubts Glenfarne can meet its rapid timeline.

“I’m certainly not out of touch with reality,” she said.

Advertisement
Sen. Elvi Gray-Jackson, D-Anchorage, speaks during a floor session at the Alaska State Capitol in Juneau on January 21, 2026. (Marc Lester / ADN)

Alaska lawmakers have said they’re uncertain what steps they may be asked to take to provide the full project with long-term fiscal stability, if any.

They say they’re awaiting the governor’s property tax proposal.

Giessel told reporters on Tuesday: “Glenfarne has told us, ‘Don’t worry, this is a private-sector project. We will bear all of the cost. We will get investors. We will take all of the overruns and delays. We’ll take all that responsibility.’”

Fitzpatrick, with Glenfarne, said the company “continues to make progress toward a final investment decision for Alaska LNG.”

That includes “engaging with state and local policymakers on property tax reforms that will enable Alaska LNG to proceed and successfully unlock billions of dollars in royalty, tax, and other economic benefits for Alaskans,” he said.

“State and borough officials have recognized that Alaska’s high property taxes are an impediment for a North Slope natural gas project for more than a decade, and this issue has repeatedly been raised before the legislature including in testimony from Glenfarne and the legislature’s oil and gas consultants,” he said.

Advertisement

Asked about the need for state permits for early construction such as the proposed roads or bridge crossings, Fitzpatrick said, “Permitting requirements are fully accounted for in our construction plan.”

Glenfarne is working on smaller LNG export projects in the Lower 48, including Magnolia LNG in Louisiana and Texas LNG.

Giessel told reporters that Glenfarne has not reached a final investment decision for those projects.

“In fact, they’ve not reached FID on any North American project yet, and that Texas project has been in the works now for a couple of years,” she said. “So I am skeptical about any of those timelines they had in that FERC document.”

Should Alaska invest?

House Majority Leader Chuck Kopp, a Republican, said he’s optimistic the Alaska LNG project will be built this time after decades of unsuccessful attempts by earlier, similar projects.

Advertisement
House Majority Leader Chuck Kopp, R-Anchorage, during a floor session on Jan. 24, 2025. (Marc Lester / ADN)

“I do appreciate that all the capital risk has been on them to this point,” Kopp said of Glenfarne.

“The spend rate, whatever it is, I really don’t know,” he said. “But I know (Glenfarne has) spent a lot and the state has not.”

Kopp said the state might want to consider investing 5% in the pipeline, at a potential cost of around $600 million, from the $3 billion Constitutional Budget Reserve savings account.

“If we had an investor interest, we would have access to everything another investor could rightfully see before they made that decision,” he said.

An investment could increase revenue to the state through tariff income that would come alongside production taxes, royalties and other income, he said.

The project is important because it has the potential to support future generations of Alaskans, he said.

Advertisement

The idea of a state investment in the project is something he’s discussing with colleagues, he said.

Kopp said he believes the lack of information from the company to lawmakers may relate to upcoming details that could push the project forward.

Perhaps President Donald Trump’s State of the Union speech, set for Feb. 24, includes more federal support for the project, perhaps even a direct investment, Kopp said.

“I don’t have any insider baseball on this,” he said. ”But it would be consistent with how this administration likes do things. And the president has said Alaska is a national energy and a national strategic priority.”

“So there could be a massive commitment that pushes this into FID,” or final investment decision, he said.

Advertisement

Rep. Ky Holland, an independent and co-chair of the House Energy Committee, said he — along with many other Alaskans — would love to see the project built.

He said it has received state attention and funding in the past that has prevented state investment in other opportunities, including in renewable energy that could support stable utility costs, such as the Susitna-Watana Dam project or wind projects.

In that way, it’s been a “drag on the economy,” he said.

It’s hard to say if Alaska LNG will be built, he said.

“I’m still waiting to see clear ship-or-pay binding agreements for someone to buy gas,” he said. “Absent that, I appreciate the level of enthusiasm the current developers have.”

Advertisement

Holland said state agencies don’t appear to be staffed up with needed manpower and finances to support the project’s permitting requirements, while budgets for workforce training or contractor assistance appear inadequate. Thousands of workers will be needed to build the pipeline.

“The (state agency) budgets I’ve seen look like business as usual, which is barely keeping the wheels on the bus,” he said.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Wildfires in northern Alaska are the worst they’ve been in 3,000 years

Published

on

Wildfires in northern Alaska are the worst they’ve been in 3,000 years


Wildfires on Alaska’s North Slope are more frequent and more severe now than they have been at any point over the past 3,000 years, research suggests.

The findings are based on satellite data, as well as on soil pulled from peatlands that contain ancient chunks of charcoal and other signs of wildfires. The research team says the increase in blazes, driven by permafrost thaw and tundra “shrubification,” constitutes a new wildfire regime that will likely intensify as global temperatures continue to rise.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending