Connect with us

News

For Canadians Visiting Myrtle Beach, Trump Policies Make the Vibe Chillier

Published

on

For Canadians Visiting Myrtle Beach, Trump Policies Make the Vibe Chillier

Canadians have long flocked to the South Carolina beach town. This year, many are offended by the president and threatening to stay away.

WHY WE’RE HERE

We’re exploring how America defines itself one place at a time. At one popular South Carolina beach town, locals are hoping that Southern charm can offset hard feelings among Canadian tourists.


The Southerners at the Myrtle Beach Welcome Center had brewed Tim Hortons coffee for their northern guests. They were giving away cookies adorned with maple leaves, and lapel pins featuring the twinned flags of Canada and South Carolina.

It was Monday morning at the kickoff party for Can-Am Days, the annual ritual that honors the Canadians who have long bolstered the city’s tourist economy in the winter months. For more than 60 years, it had been the most easygoing of international summits: The local Lions Club would welcome Lions from Canada. There were garden tours and golf tournaments. In pre-internet days, the local paper would print the Canadian news.

Now it had gotten complicated and weird, a result of the trade war being waged against Canada by a capricious American president whose image is all over the Myrtle Beach T-shirt shops, his famous fist pump as popular as sea gulls and sunsets.

Advertisement

Along with brandishing ever-changing tariff policies — threatening, imposing, rescinding them — President Trump has repeatedly asserted that he wants to make Canada the 51st state, leaving many Canadians astonished and furious. Some have canceled plans to visit conservative Myrtle Beach, part of a broader grass-roots travel boycott that is threatening to put a dent in the $20.5 billion that Canadian visitors spend in the United States each year.

Amy Gleiser, who works at an academic teaching hospital in Ontario, is among those who have taken a stand. Reached by telephone on Wednesday, Ms. Gleiser, 47, said that she and her family had canceled their trip to Myrtle Beach, losing the deposit on their condo, and were heading instead to the Yucatan Peninsula. All because of Mr. Trump.

“It’s bullying,” she said of his treatment of Canada. “That’s how we feel.”

No one in Myrtle Beach is quite sure what the bad blood means for their community, which offers a less stuffy alternative to Hilton Head Island, down the coast. With its beachwear superstores, go-kart tracks and mini golf, Myrtle is the kind of laid-back beach town where the Hooters restaurant chain’s tongue-in-cheek motto — “Delightfully Tacky, Yet Unrefined” — could very well appear on the city seal. And it takes a certain pride in offering affordable vacations to the working and middle classes of the American South.

Canadians, too, have been charmed by Myrtle Beach’s sunshine and comparatively low prices — as well as by the crucial fact that it is much closer than Florida when traveling by minivan.

Advertisement

Tracy Conner, interim president of the area chamber of commerce, said it was too early to tell whether a significant number of Canadians stayed home for this year’s Can-Am Days, which run from March 8 to March 16. Tourism officials noted that there were still plenty of license plates from Ontario and Quebec in restaurant parking lots.

On Monday morning, a few dozen Canadians, most of them retirees, had stopped by the visitors center for the kickoff party. Mayor Brenda Bethune, in a short speech, tried to put some distance between Myrtle Beach and the White House — a challenge given Mr. Trump’s lopsided November victory in Horry County, which includes the city.

“I know there is a lot of tension right now, and we can’t help that, on those levels,” said Ms. Bethune, who, as it turns out, supported Nikki Haley in last year’s Republican primary. “We have to accept what we are given. And we are going to do that graciously, with a smile on our faces, with Southern hospitality, and say, ‘Welcome.’”

A local musician, of the mellow sort found on the patios of beach-adjacent seafood restaurants, played a cover of “Everybody Wants to Rule the World,” following it up with a James Taylor paean to friendship. (The Burlington Teen Tour Band of Ontario, which had been scheduled to march from the welcome center to the beach, had canceled in protest).

The snowbirds mingled. And, through the veil of politeness for which they are renowned, they vented.

Advertisement

Patricia Cape, 80, a retired pharmacy worker from Hamilton, Ontario, said her children had been trying to persuade her and her husband, Gary, to cut their vacation short for patriotic reasons. She was giving it some thought. “I am very disappointed by President Trump,” she said. “Why would he want to alienate Canada? I love the United States.”

Arthur and Kathy Jadischke, of Mississauga, Ontario, had already changed their plans and were heading home early. Mr. Jadischke, 82, said he did not know if he would return to Myrtle Beach. He compared Mr. Trump with Hitler and Vladimir Putin. “If this stuff keeps happening, I can’t see myself coming,” he said. “Because I’d be ashamed.”

Wayne Gray, a Myrtle Beach native and former city councilman, said that Can-Am Days were more crucial for the local economy a few decades ago, when the influx of Canadians between January and April gave a boost to local businesses before the big crush of American visitors between Memorial Day and Labor Day.

These days, Mr. Gray said, Canadians’ contributions to the economy have diminished in importance as the population of Horry County has exploded, and as the area became a destination not just for vacations but for events like youth travel sports tournaments.

“I think we’re all very appreciative of the Canadian visitors who come here,” Mr. Gray said. “But the Canadian American Days are just not as impactful as they once were.”

Advertisement

The visitors bureau estimates that international travelers, the bulk of whom were Canadian, contributed about 2 percent of the $1.9 billion spent by tourists in 2023, the last year such data was available.

Some business owners said they have not felt a drop in business this year, at least so far. Others say they have noticed missing Canadians. Judith Davies, chairwoman of the Horry County Democratic Party, said that a number of local rental property owners had called her, worried about Canadians canceling their vacation rentals.

Many Canadians are repeat visitors who come to Myrtle Beach for weeks or months at a time. This week, some were further offended by the Trump administration’s decision to enforce a law requiring Canadians who stay in the United States for 30 days or more to register with the authorities.

But the affronts all seemed to be coming from the top. Canadians reported no hostility from pro-Trump locals. It was the same relaxed hospitality they had experienced for years.

Even so, Rick McCall, 74, a retired car dealer from Simcoe, Ontario, said that he no longer felt comfortable in the United States. Mr. McCall describes himself as a conservative but said he considers Mr. Trump “unstable” and a “madman.”

Advertisement

For the past five years, Mr. McCall said, he has owned a vacation house in North Myrtle Beach. Mr. Trump’s war of words, he added, had him seriously considering selling it.

“I’ve got to tell you, it’s just not a welcoming thing. I think it’s really changed the dynamics,” he said. “I think it’s tragic. I really do.”

On Tuesday, behind the counter of a kite store that had been partially transformed into a Trump-themed emporium, David Sandifer was listening to classic rock and offering merchandise like a “White Privilege Card,” vaguely modeled on an American Express card. There was also a fake dollar bill featuring what was advertised as “Hillbilly Veep” JD Vance clutching an assault rifle.

Mr. Sandifer, 75, a former electrical contractor, said that he could see the nation losing a significant number of Canadians avoiding the United States if Mr. Trump kept the pressure on. But he did not seem to mind. God, he said, was working through Mr. Trump.

The Canadians, he suggested, should heed the collective advice of many a beach-themed T-shirt, and chill out.

Advertisement

“You can’t let things like that get in the way of your life,” he said. “You still have to have a good time.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Video: Man on Roof Faces Off with ICE Agents for Hours in Minnesota

Published

on

Video: Man on Roof Faces Off with ICE Agents for Hours in Minnesota

new video loaded: Man on Roof Faces Off with ICE Agents for Hours in Minnesota

transcript

transcript

Man on Roof Faces Off with ICE Agents for Hours in Minnesota

A man clung to a partially built roof for hours in frigid temperatures during a standoff with immigration agents in Chanhassen, Minn., a suburb of Minneapolis. The confrontation was part of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown in the state to remove what it calls “vicious criminals.”

“What a [expletive] embarrassment.” “Look at this guy.” “What’s with all the fascists?” “The Lord is with you.” “Where’s the bad hombre? What did this guy do?” “He’s out here working to support his [expletive] family.” “Gestapo agents.” “Oh yeah, shake your head, tough guy.” “This is where you get the worst of the worst right here, hard-working builders.” “Crossing the border is not a crime. Coming illegally to the United States is not a crime, according to you.” “C’mon, get out of here.” “Take him to a different hospital.”

Advertisement
A man clung to a partially built roof for hours in frigid temperatures during a standoff with immigration agents in Chanhassen, Minn., a suburb of Minneapolis. The confrontation was part of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown in the state to remove what it calls “vicious criminals.”

By Ernesto Londoño, Jackeline Luna and Daniel Fetherston

December 17, 2025

Continue Reading

News

Trump’s BBC lawsuit: A botched report, BritBox, and porn

Published

on

Trump’s BBC lawsuit: A botched report, BritBox, and porn

Journalists report outside BBC Broadcasting House in London. In a new lawsuit, President Trump is seeking $10 billion from the BBC for defamation.

Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP/AP

Not content with an apology and the resignation of two top BBC executives, President Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit Monday against the BBC in his continued strategy to take the press to court.

Beyond the legal attack on yet another media outlet, the litigation represents an audacious move against a national institution of a trusted ally. It hinges on an edit presented in a documentary of the president’s words on a fateful day. Oddly enough, it also hinges on the appeal of a niche streaming service to people in Florida, and the use of a technological innovation embraced by porn devotees.

A sloppy edit

At the heart of Trump’s case stands an episode of the BBC television documentary program Panorama that compresses comments Trump made to his supporters on Jan. 6, 2021, before they laid siege to the U.S. Capitol.

Advertisement

The episode seamlessly links Trump’s call for people to walk up to the Capitol with his exhortation nearly 55 minutes later: “And we fight, we fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell you don’t have a country anymore.”

Trump’s attorneys argue that the presentation gives viewers the impression that the president incited the violence that followed. They said his remarks had been doctored, not edited, and noted the omission of his statement that protesters would be “marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

As NPR and other news organizations have documented, many defendants in the Jan. 6 attack on Congress said they believed they had been explicitly urged by Trump to block the certification of President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.

Trump’s lawsuit calls the documentary “a false, defamatory, deceptive, disparaging, inflammatory, and malicious depiction of President Trump.”

The lawsuit alleges that the depiction was “fabricated” and aired “in a brazen attempt to interfere in and influence the Election to President Trump’s detriment.”

Advertisement

While the BBC has not filed a formal response to the lawsuit, the public broadcaster has reiterated that it will defend itself in court.

A Nov. 13 letter to Trump’s legal team on behalf of the BBC from Charles Tobin, a leading U.S. First Amendment attorney, argued that the broadcaster has demonstrated contrition by apologizing, withdrawing the broadcast, and accepting the executives’ resignations.

Tobin also noted, on behalf of the BBC, that Trump had already been indicted by a grand jury on four criminal counts stemming from his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, including his conduct on Jan. 6, 2021, on the Capitol grounds.

The appeal of BritBox

For all the current consternation about the documentary, it didn’t get much attention at the time. The BBC aired the documentary twice on the eve of the 2024 elections — but never broadcast it directly in Florida.

That matters because the lawsuit was filed in Florida, where Trump alleges that the program was intended to discourage voters from voting for him.

Advertisement

Yet Tobin notes, Trump won Florida in 2024 by a “commanding 13-point margin, improving over his 2020 and 2016 performances in the state.”

Trump failed to make the case that Floridians were influenced by the documentary, Tobin wrote. He said the BBC did not broadcast the program in Florida through U.S. channels. (The BBC has distribution deals with PBS and NPR and their member stations for television and radio programs, respectively, but not to air Panorama.)

It was “geographically restricted” to U.K. viewers, Tobin wrote.

Hence the argument in Trump’s lawsuit that American viewers have other ways to watch it. The first is BritBox, a BBC streaming service that draws more on British mysteries set at seaside locales than BBC coverage of American politics.

Back in March, then-BBC Director General Tim Davie testified before the House of Commons that BritBox had more than 4 million subscribers in the U.S. (The BBC did not break down how many subscribers it has in Florida or how often Panorama documentaries are viewed by subscribers in the U.S. or the state, in response to questions posed by NPR for this story.)

Advertisement

“The Panorama Documentary was available to BritBox subscribers in Florida and was in fact viewed by these subscribers through BritBox and other means provided by the BBC,” Trump’s lawsuit states.

NPR searched for Panorama documentaries on the BritBox streaming service through the Amazon Prime platform, one of its primary distributors. The sole available episode dates from 2000. Trump does not mention podcasts. Panorama is streamed on BBC Sounds. Its episodes do not appear to be available in the U.S. on such mainstream podcast distributors in the U.S. such as Apple Podcasts, Spotify or Pocket Casts, according to a review by NPR.

Software that enables anonymous browsing – of porn

Another way Trump’s lawsuit suggests people in the U.S. could watch that particular episode of Panorama, if they were so inclined, is through a Virtual Private Network, or VPN.

Trump’s suit says millions of Florida citizens use VPNs to view content from foreign streamers that would otherwise be restricted. And the BBC iPlayer is among the most popular streaming services accessed by viewers using a VPN, Trump’s lawsuit asserts.

In response to questions from NPR, the BBC declined to break down figures for how many people in the U.S. access the BBC iPlayer through VPNs.

Advertisement

Demand for such software did shoot up in 2024 and early 2025. Yet, according to analysts — and even to materials cited by the president’s team in his own case — the reason appears to have less to do with foreign television shows and more to do with online pornography.

Under a new law, Florida began requiring age verification checks for visitors to pornographic websites, notes Paul Bischoff, editor of Comparitech, a site that reviews personal cybersecurity software.

“People use VPNs to get around those age verification and site blocks,” Bischoff says. “The reason is obvious.”

An article in the Tampa Free Press cited by Trump’s lawsuit to help propel the idea of a sharp growth of interest in the BBC actually undercuts the idea in its very first sentence – by focusing on that law.

“Demand for Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) has skyrocketed in Florida following the implementation of a new law requiring age verification for access to adult websites,” the first paragraph states. “This dramatic increase reflects a widespread effort by Floridians to bypass the restrictions and access adult content.”

Advertisement

Several legal observers anticipate possible settlement

Several First Amendment attorneys tell NPR they believe Trump’s lawsuit will result in a settlement of some kind, in part because there’s new precedent. In the past year, the parent companies of ABC News and CBS News have each paid $16 million to settle cases filed by Trump that many legal observers considered specious.

“The facts benefit Trump and defendants may be concerned about reputational harm,” says Carl Tobias, a professor of law at the University of Richmond who specializes in free speech issues. “The BBC also has admitted it could have done better and essentially apologized.”

Some of Trump’s previous lawsuits against the media have failed. He is currently also suing the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Des Moines Register and its former pollster, and the board of the Pulitzer Prize.

Continue Reading

News

Video: Prosecutors Charge Nick Reiner With Murdering His Parents

Published

on

Video: Prosecutors Charge Nick Reiner With Murdering His Parents

new video loaded: Prosecutors Charge Nick Reiner With Murdering His Parents

transcript

transcript

Prosecutors Charge Nick Reiner With Murdering His Parents

Los Angeles prosecutors charged Nick Reiner with two counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of his parents, the director Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner.

Our office will be filing charges against Nick Reiner, who is accused of killing his parents, actor-director Rob Reiner and photographer-producer Michele Singer Reiner. These charges will be two counts of first-degree murder, with a special circumstance of multiple murders. He also faces a special allegation that he personally used a dangerous and deadly weapon, that being a knife. These charges carry a maximum sentence of life in prison without the possibility parole or the death penalty. No decision at this point has been made with respect to the death penalty.

Advertisement
Los Angeles prosecutors charged Nick Reiner with two counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of his parents, the director Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner.

By Shawn Paik

December 16, 2025

Continue Reading

Trending