Connect with us

Maine

Governors reveal their POV on Donald Trump and Maine Governor Janet Mills’ heated exchange: ‘A little uncomfortable…’

Published

on

Governors reveal their POV on Donald Trump and Maine Governor Janet Mills’ heated exchange: ‘A little uncomfortable…’


A routine meeting between President Donald Trump and the nation’s governors turned into a dramatic confrontation when Maine Governor Janet Mills refused to back down on her state’s stance regarding transgender athletes. In a packed room at the White House last Friday (February 21), Trump pressed Mills to comply with his executive order banning transgender women and girls from competing in female sports. What followed was a tense exchange that had some governors shifting uncomfortably in their seats. Singling out Mills, Trump declared that Maine was the only state resisting his order and warned that non-compliance would result in the loss of federal funding, including financial aid for schools. “Are you not going to comply with it?” he demanded.

Mills, unfazed by the pressure, firmly responded, “I’m complying with state and federal laws.”

The president’s tone sharpened. “We are federal law. You better do it because you’re not going to get federal funding… Your population doesn’t want men in women’s sports.”

Without missing a beat, Mills fired back, “We’ll see you in court.”

Advertisement

Trump, in his signature brash style, retorted, “Good. I’ll see you in court. I’ll look forward to that. That should be a real easy one. And enjoy your life after, governor, because I don’t think you’ll be in elected politics.”

An Uncomfortable Encounter for Governors

For many in the room, the fiery exchange was unexpected and, according to some, unsettling. Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt, vice-chair of the National Governors Association (NGA), described the encounter as “a little uncomfortable.” Meanwhile, Colorado Governor Jared Polis, attempting to strike a neutral tone, suggested that the discussion did little to foster constructive dialogue. “We always hope that people can disagree in a way that elevates the discourse and tries to come to a common solution,” he remarked. However, Stitt noted that the clash may have served as good political theater for both sides. “The NCAA has followed that, I think the Olympics have. And then you have a governor saying that they’re not going to follow that,” he said. “So, I don’t know what legal background she has, but they talked about seeing each other in court. And we’ll see what happens.”

Advertisement

Maine Holds Its Ground

Trump’s executive order seeks to deny federal funding to schools that allow transgender girls to participate in female sports, a move that aligns with his broader push to regulate gender identity in athletics. However, earlier this month, the Maine Principal’s Association reaffirmed its commitment to allowing transgender students to compete, citing protections under the Maine Human Rights Act.

Trump, unswayed, warned that Maine schools wouldn’t receive federal funding “until they clean that up.”

Mills, unwilling to bend to the pressure, issued a statement through The Independent, asserting that her administration, along with the state attorney general, would take “all appropriate and necessary legal action” to fight for Maine’s rights and preserve funding for its schools.

“This is not just about funding,” Mills stated. “This is about whether a President can force compliance with his will, without regard for the rule of law that governs our nation. He cannot.”

Advertisement

A Legal Battle Looms

The clash has already triggered an investigation by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights into whether Maine is violating Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex-based discrimination in education. While the legal showdown between the state and the Trump administration looms, one thing is clear: neither side is willing to back down.

For Mills, the battle isn’t just about sports—it’s about resisting what she sees as presidential overreach. For Trump, it’s about enforcing what he believes to be a necessary protection for women’s sports.

As the White House showdown makes headlines, the question remains: Will Maine stand its ground, or will the weight of federal pressure force a change? One thing is certain—this fight is far from over.





Source link

Advertisement

Maine

Are you required to display both front and back license plates in Maine?

Published

on

Are you required to display both front and back license plates in Maine?


You might not give a lot of thought to your two license plates. Maybe only looking at them when you renew your registration or when you got the new pine tree design. But those plates play an important role on the road.

Karyn asked the CBS13 I-Team:

“I see a lot of cars on the road with only a rear license plate. We are issued two plates at the time of registration. Do we actually have to display both on our car? Also, can you be fined for only having one plate?”

Maine law does require drivers to display two license plates. One on the front and one on the back.

The state says that requirement, which has been in place since the 90s, makes cars more visible to law enforcement and helps with automated tolling on the Maine Turnpike.

Advertisement

A driver can be fined if they don’t properly display both plates.

According to state data, convictions for improperly displaying a registration plate have gone up the past few years. Though the numbers are still small compared to the total number of vehicles on the road.

In 2021, there were 63. Seventy convictions in 2022 and in 2023 and 2024, there were around 140.

The are some exemptions to the two-plate law. That includes motorcycles and trailers.

While most states have similar laws, about 20 only require a rear license plate.

Advertisement

The Maine Legislature has debated bills that would remove the front plate requirement in the past, but none have passed.

Have a question for CBS13 I-Team? Call their tip line at (207) 228-7713 or send an email to tips@wgme.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Maine adopts tougher limits on PFAS in drinking water

Published

on

Maine adopts tougher limits on PFAS in drinking water


The Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention has lowered the state limit on forever chemicals, or PFAS, in drinking water to align with rigorous federal standards established by the Biden administration.

The change reduces the maximum amount of the two most harmful forever chemicals to four parts per trillion (ppt) — roughly four drops in 20 Olympic-sized swimming pools — and no more than 10 ppt, for three others combined.

The new rule, adopted in December, will be rolled out in phases, from monitoring by 2027 to initial enforcement in 2028. When in full effect, Maine’s 1,900 public drinking water systems could face fines of up to $2,000 per day for exceeding the maximum contaminant limits.

“The (Department of Health and Human Services) has determined that these new requirements are necessary to protect public health,” it wrote in a rule summary. “The department will work with stakeholders to provide technical assistance and guidance where needed.”

Advertisement

Maine’s old limit was 20 ppt for the combined sum of six forever chemicals. The two most harmful, PFOA and PFOS, are now capped at four ppt each, which is a sharp decrease because they account for the bulk of most forever chemical readings in Maine.

Systems have until April 2029 to comply, which could require treating water, drilling new wells or hooking up to a clean water supply. Until then, Maine will use its 20 ppt limit to “cover the gap,” said DHHS spokeswoman Lindsay Hammes.

Forever chemicals have been used since the 1940s in consumer products and industry, including in nonstick pans, food packaging and firefighting foam. Even trace amounts are deemed harmful, linked to a host of health problems that range from immune deficiency to certain cancers.

State public health officials estimate it could cost $50 million to bring Maine’s public drinking water systems into full compliance with the new standard. The state plans to tap the federal safe drinking water revolving loan fund to cover those costs.

Maintaining each system could cost between $1,000 to $100,000 a year, public health officials predict.

Advertisement

An analysis of state data from 2023 by Defend Our Health, a Portland environmental nonprofit, determined that one in 10 Mainers — roughly 134,035 people — drinks from a public water supply that exceeds the limit Maine just adopted, including in Augusta, Sanford and Waterville.

The group’s data showed that more than 14,000 students and staff at 60 Maine schools, day cares, and colleges are drinking water that was below Maine’s old limit but are above its new limit, like Lake Region High School in Naples or Marshwood Middle School in Eliot.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency adopted its protective PFAS limits in April 2024. It said the limit would prevent thousands of premature deaths, serious adult illnesses, and immune and developmental impacts to children.

Private well owners remain responsible for ensuring their water is safe to drink. The quality and safety of private domestic wells are not regulated by the federal government, nor by most state laws. About half of Maine’s residents gets their drinking water from a private well.

Two of the four forever chemicals that had been regulated under the old state rule, PFDA and PFHpA, will not be regulated under the new rule. They are used in food packaging and stain-resistant coatings on rugs and furniture.

Advertisement

Advocates wanted these to count toward the new state limit, but officials say it’s not necessary; they only occur when there is too much PFOA or PFOS anyway. The state will still require the systems to monitor for these chemicals even though they won’t count toward the cap.

The new rule will also require Maine water systems to regulate two new forever chemicals: GenX and PFBS. These chemicals were created to replace PFOA and PFOS but have been found to pose similar health concerns.

Previously, the EPA had advised but not required a drinking water limit of 70 ppt. Many of Maine’s other PFAS advisory levels for milk, eggs, beef, crops, hay, fish or game are based on this old advisory.

State officials said they will use the new EPA standard, and the science supporting it, to inform Maine’s PFAS standards in other substances, but said it would happen over time, and that no one should expect Maine’s milk, beef and fish consumption advisories to change soon.

Maine has identified more than 600 residential wells near former sludge fields, military bases and industrial sites that test above Maine’s old PFAS limit, and that amount is likely to double under the new standard.

Advertisement

The Maine Department of Environmental Protection could not be reached for an interview about how the new limit will be used when deciding who among those living on sludge-impacted land will have their water remediation costs covered by the state.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Housing affordability key issue in Maine’s housing crisis, report shows

Published

on

Housing affordability key issue in Maine’s housing crisis, report shows


A new report is showing some progress when it comes to housing in Maine, but affordability continues to remain a key challenge.

According to a report by MaineHousing, the income needed to afford a median priced home in the state has increased 187 percent between 2015 and 2024.

In that same period, the state’s median income only went up 44 percent.

The rental market has not fared better, as it is affected by the dramatically increased cost of real estate across Maine, according to the report.

Advertisement

Despite MaineHousing’s record success in 2025 with its first-time homebuyer program, the demand from homebuyers continues to outstrip the supply of homes for sale.

While year-over-year price increases were lower than in the recent past, the supply pressure is not likely to ease meaningfully until interest rates tick down more.

Maine home for sale (WGME)

“Maine, a state famous for natural beauty and quality of life, has become an attractive location for telecommuters and retirees who often have larger home-buying budgets than Mainers,” MaineHousing said in the report.

In a look at the state’s homelessness crisis, the report suggests underfunding at homeless service centers is leading to skewed data.

Advertisement

According to MaineHousing, housing production is one key to solving these problems.

“MaineHousing’s affordable housing production remains well above historical averages, with 755 low and middle-income units coming online in 2025, and a record future production pipeline extending through the next few years,” MaineHousing said in the report.

While affordable housing production is increasing, unpredictable support at the federal and state levels and high construction costs could still bring that increase to a halt in future years.

Moving into 2026, Maine shows evidence of progress on several fronts of the housing crisis, but there is still much work to be done.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending