Connect with us

Entertainment

How Beyoncé finally won album of the year at the Grammys

Published

on

How Beyoncé finally won album of the year at the Grammys

“As selected by the 13,000 voting members of the Recording Academy…”

Did you notice that bit of verbiage at the 67th Grammy Awards on Sunday night? Every time someone presented one of the show’s major prizes — album of the year, record of the year, song of the year, best new artist — he or she rattled off the line before revealing the winner.

It was a small but telling detail that demonstrated how the academy wants to be perceived after years of being portrayed as a shadowy record-industry cabal. Dogged by criticism that it routinely undervalues the work of women and people of color, the group lately has sought to convey the message that decisions about the Grammys aren’t made in a smoky back room but by the thousands of music professionals who belong to the organization.

Not only that, but the academy has repeatedly emphasized — including on Sunday’s show, where Chief Executive Harvey Mason Jr. hammered the point in a speech — that its electorate has evolved by welcoming younger and more diverse members (and, by extension, by booting older and whiter ones).

Maybe it’s working.

Advertisement

On Sunday, Beyoncé finally won album of the year, the Grammys’ most prestigious award, with “Cowboy Carter,” her scholarly yet intrepid exploration of the Black roots of country music. It was the pop superstar’s fifth try in a decade and a half for a prize that Taylor Swift won an unprecedented four times in that same stretch — and the first time a Black woman has taken the award since Lauryn Hill in 1999.

“It’s been many, many years,” Beyoncé said with a knowing little laugh as she accepted the trophy, which she dedicated to Linda Martell, the pioneering Black female country singer who makes a guest appearance on “Cowboy Carter.” “I hope we just keep pushing forward, opening doors,” she added, taking her place as only the fourth Black woman to win album of the year (after Hill, Whitney Houston and Natalie Cole) in the Grammys’ 67-year-history.

Other signs of systemic change Sunday night: Kendrick Lamar’s wins for record and song of the year with “Not Like Us,” the climactic volley from the Compton rapper’s epic beef with Drake. The festive diss track, which led Drake to file a federal lawsuit last month accusing both men’s record company of defamation, is just the second hip-hop track to carry each of those categories (after Childish Gambino’s “This Is America” won record and song in 2019).

Advertisement

And then there was the academy’s highly theatrical reconciliation with the Weeknd, who’d vowed in 2021 to boycott the Grammys after his smash single “Blinding Lights” was denied even a single nomination. The Canadian pop-soul star, who’d said he was protesting a corrupt voting process, performed without advance notice Sunday right after Mason’s spiel, in which the CEO described the Weeknd as “someone who has seen the work the academy has put in.” (He’s also someone with a brand-new album to promote).

Yet the story with the night’s big winner is more complicated than a feel-good tale of institutional overhaul. As much as the Recording Academy has adapted to Beyoncé, the singer in many ways adapted to the academy in making “Cowboy Carter.”

Full of hand-played acoustic instruments and gestures toward various historical traditions, it’s a Grammy album that has far more in common than Beyoncé’s earlier work with previous album of the year winners by the likes of Norah Jones, Herbie Hancock, the Dixie Chicks, Beck — even, dare I say it, Mumford & Sons.

Granted, Beyoncé is using those sounds in service of a distinct narrative; “Cowboy Carter” is about family and lineage and who’s entitled to a sense of American belonging. (If I remember correctly, Mumford & Sons sang mostly about haberdashery.) But by taking up an explicitly roots-oriented approach, she was looking to make a point about the Grammys’ value system — daring voters, essentially, not to give her the prize so we could see the hierarchies in place.

That’s not to say she didn’t want to take home album of the year. “A-O-T-Y, I ain’t win,” she sings on “Cowboy Carter,” referring to her loss at the Grammys with 2022’s clubby “Renaissance,” “Take that s— on the chin / Come back and f— up the pen.” And nobody plans a concert as detailed as the one Beyoncé gave during halftime of a Christmas Day NFL game — just as academy members were filling out their ballots — without hoping for some kind of return on her investment. (Early Monday, the singer announced that she’ll take “Cowboy Carter” on the road, starting with four shows at Inglewood’s SoFi Stadium in late April.)

Advertisement

So who precisely secured Beyoncé’s path to victory? Was it the new voters that Mason says he’s brought into the fold or was it old-timers for whom Beyoncé’s music finally made sense? I’m inclined to think it was a little of both. In addition to album of the year, “Cowboy Carter” won the country album prize Sunday — Beyoncé’s priceless surprise-face became an instant meme — which meant she had plenty of Nashville support. According to academy rules, a member can vote in only three genres, so this likely wasn’t a case of pop outsiders flooding the zone to lift Beyoncé above established country stars like Chris Stapleton and Lainey Wilson.

But I also suspect that among those 13,000 were many musicians who’ve grown up in Beyoncé’s shadow and simply felt that it was her time — that she’d been denied the flagship Grammy on too many occasions and that the historical record needed to be set straight.

Which indeed it did. “Cowboy Carter” is not Beyoncé’s finest album; it’s not my favorite of her albums, either, although it does get wonderfully weird near the end in songs like “II Hands II Heaven” and “Sweet Honey Buckiin’” that imagine country music as a kind of celestial trance experience. But it is an album, as Beyoncé suggested in her acceptance speech, that opens doors. I’d bet Martell, who’s 83, took some pleasure in the shout-out.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

‘Madhuvidhu’ movie review: A light-hearted film that squanders a promising conflict

Published

on

‘Madhuvidhu’ movie review: A light-hearted film that squanders a promising conflict

At the centre of Madhuvidhu directed by Vishnu Aravind is a house where only men reside, three generations of them living in harmony. Unlike the Anjooran household in Godfather, this is not a house where entry is banned to women, but just that women don’t choose to come here. For Amrithraj alias Ammu (Sharafudheen), the protagonist, 28 marriage proposals have already fallen through although he was not lacking in interest.

When a not-so-cordial first meeting with Sneha (Kalyani Panicker) inevitably turns into mutual attraction, things appear about to change. But some unexpected hiccups are waiting for them, their different religions being one of them. Writers Jai Vishnu and Bipin Mohan do not seem to have any major ambitions with Madhuvidhu, but they seem rather content to aim for the middle space of a feel-good entertainer. Only that they end up hitting further lower.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Dataland, the world’s first museum of AI arts, sets opening date and first exhibition

Published

on

Dataland, the world’s first museum of AI arts, sets opening date and first exhibition

After more than two and a half years of research, planning and construction, Dataland, the world’s first museum of AI arts, will open June 20.

Co-founded by new media artists Refik Anadol and Efsun Erkılıç, the museum anchors the $1-billion Frank Gehry-designed Grand LA complex across the street from Walt Disney Concert Hall in downtown Los Angeles. Its first exhibition, “Machine Dreams: Rainforest,” created by Refik Anadol Studio, was inspired by a trip to the Amazon and uses vast data sets to immerse visitors in a machine-generated sensory experience of the natural world.

The architecture of the space, which Anadol calls “a living museum,” is used to reflect distant rainforest ecosystems, including changing temperature, light, smell and visuals. Anadol refers to these large-scale, shimmering tableaus as “digital sculptures.”

“This is such an important technology, and represents such an important transformation of humanity,” Anadol said in an interview. “And we found it so meaningful and purposeful to be sure that there is a place to talk about it, to create with it.”

The 35,000-square-foot privately funded museum devotes 25,000 square feet to public space, with the remaining 10,000 square feet holding the in-house technology that makes the space run. Dataland contains five immersive galleries and a 30-foot ceiling. An escalator by the entrance will transport guests to the experiences below. The museum declined to say how much Dataland, designed by architecture firm Gensler, cost to build.

Advertisement

An isometric architectural rendering of Dataland. The 25,000-square-foot AI arts museum also contains an additional 10,000 square feet of non-public space that holds its operational technology.

(Refik Anadol Studio for Dataland)

Dataland will collect and preserve artificial intelligence art and is powered by an open-access AI model created by Anadol’s studio called the Large Nature Model. The model, which does not source without permission, culls mountains of data about the natural world from partners including the Smithsonian, London’s Natural History Museum and the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. This data, including up to half a billion images of nature, will form the basis for the creation of a variety of AI artworks, including “Machine Dreams.”

“AI art is a part of digital art, meaning a lineage that uses software, data and computers to create a form of art,” Anadol explained. “I know that many artists don’t want to disclose their technologies, but for me, AI means possibilities. And possibilities come with responsibilities. We have to disclose exactly where our data comes from.”

Advertisement

Sustainability is another responsibility that Anadol takes seriously. For more than a decade, Anadol has devoted much thought to the massive carbon footprint associated with AI models. The Large Nature Model is hosted on Google Cloud servers in Oregon that use 87% carbon-free, renewable energy. Anadol says the energy used to support an individual visit to the museum is equivalent to what it takes to charge a single smartphone.

Anadol believes AI can form a powerful bridge to nature — serving as a means to access and preserve it — and that the swiftly evolving technology can be harnessed to illuminate essential truths about humanity’s relationship to an interconnected planet. During a time of great anxiety about the power of AI to disrupt lives and livelihoods, Anadol maintains it can be a revolutionary tool in service of a never-before-seen form of art.

“The works generate an emergent, living reality, a machine’s dream shaped by continuous streams of environmental and biological data. Within this evolving system, moments of recognition and interpretation emerge across different forms of knowledge,” a news release about the museum explains. “At the same time, the exhibition registers loss as part of this expanded field of perception, most notably in the Infinity Room, where visitors encounter the 1987 recording of the last known Kauaʻi ʻŌʻō, a now-extinct bird whose unanswered call becomes part of the work.”

“It’s very exciting to say that AI art is not image only,” Anadol said. “It’s a very multisensory, multimedium experience — meaning sound, image, video, text, smell, taste and touch. They are all together in conversation.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Michael Jackson documentary set to release after massive re-write

Published

on

Michael Jackson documentary set to release after massive re-write
  • Fans reignite Drake vs Kendrick feud after album announcement

    03:35

  • Now Playing

    Michael Jackson documentary set to release after massive re-write

    02:57

  • UP NEXT

    Patrick Brammall on How He Got His Role in ‘Devil Wears Prada 2’

    05:43

  • Henry Winkler on ‘Hazardous History’ S2, Zip lining With Grandkids

    07:38

  • Did Harry Styles and Zoë Kravitz Get Engaged?

    04:05

  • Ana Gasteyer on Role in ‘Schmigadoon!’ Musical: ‘I’m Very Mean’

    06:03

  • Laufey Talks Children’s Book ‘Mei Mei the Bunny,’ Coachella, More

    05:15

  • Shania Twain to Host the 2026 Academy of Country Music Awards

    00:26

  • Colman Domingo and Nia Long Talk New Michael Jackson Biopic

    04:50

  • Charlize Theron Talks Intense Training for New Thriller, ‘Apex’

    06:30

  • Jimmy Kimmel Shares Photo of His Son to Mark His 9th Birthday

    00:39

  • Could Rocky Score an Oscar for ‘Project Hail Mary’ Movie?

    01:36

  • ‘The Pitt’ Season 2 Finale Sees Huge Surge in Streams

    01:23

  • ‘Top Gun’ Movies Are Returning to Theaters for 40th Anniversary

    01:24

  • Chicago collectible store is latest target in Pokemon card crime spree

    01:59

  • Victoria Beckham Shares Hot Takes on Chores, Nicknames, More

    07:34

  • John Legend Talks New Book, ‘The Voice’ Finale, Marriage, More

    06:37

  • Victoria Beckham Talks Family, Marriage, Navigating Tough Times

    07:58

  • Steve Schirripa Joins TODAY With Dog WillieBoy to Talk New Book

    04:32

  • Stars of ‘Running Point’ Discuss What to Expect From Season 2

    06:34

Top Story

‘Michael’ — a new movie about the King of Pop – is drumming up big buzz. The film was produced in-part by the co-executors of the late singer’s estate, and has some critics questioning whether it is too focused on sanitizing the singer’s troubled image.

Hallie Jackson NOW

Stay Tuned NOW

Top Story

Top Story

Nightly News Netcast

Play All

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending