Connect with us

Sports

The Lions’ historic crown, and fallout for Vikings, Kevin O’Connell: Sando’s Pick Six

Published

on

The Lions’ historic crown, and fallout for Vikings, Kevin O’Connell: Sando’s Pick Six

Jared Goff had an early screen pass intercepted deep in Detroit Lions territory, and a deep ball from his own end zone picked off later. Sam Darnold missed throw after throw for the Minnesota Vikings.

The final, most pivotal game of the NFL regular season, the first between teams with 14-2 records, was not the anticipated showcase for the most dominant division in modern league history. But the ramifications were massive just the same.

The Pick Six column sorts through the fallout from the Lions’ 31-9 victory, which secured Detroit the NFC North title and a first-round playoff bye as the NFC’s top seed, while Minnesota is relegated to the fifth seed and a tougher road to reach Super Bowl LIX in New Orleans.

What does the first-round bye mean for Detroit? How do the Vikings and the five other wild cards stack up against the best wild-card teams ever? Should the league change its seeding system out of fairness? Did the Los Angeles Rams get it right by resting starters instead of trying to dodge the mighty NFC North’s runner-up? Did Green Bay commit self-sabotage?

GO DEEPER

Advertisement

Projecting each NFL playoff team’s odds to win Super Bowl, with wild-card matchup analysis

The Pick Six column answers those questions and more as the regular season turns to Black Monday and, soon, the wild-card round. Our full menu:

• Lions saved? Vikings doomed?
• Trading for O’Connell? Let’s talk
• Burrow’s hinting awakens echoes
• What makes sense for Patriots now
• Setting record straight on Barkley
• 2-minute drill: Bucs’ historic offense

1. The wild-card matchups are set. Let’s sort through the fallout

• Lions saved: Had the Lions lost by no more than two touchdowns Sunday, they would have been the greatest wild-card team since the 1970 AFL-NFL merger, at least by point differential. But because of their injuries, they would not have compared favorably to the team atop that list.

Advertisement

The Super Bowl-winning 1997 Denver Broncos finished 12-4 with a +185 scoring differential (Detroit was +200 entering Sunday), but they were second to Kansas City in the AFC West.

Unlike the current Lions, that Broncos team was incredibly healthy. Twenty of 22 Denver starters from Week 1 also started in the wild-card round. One of the newcomers to the lineup after the season opener was Hall of Fame left tackle Gary Zimmerman, who came out of retirement in September.

Compare that to the Lions, who have 17 players on injured reserve and lost another defensive starter Sunday night when first-round rookie cornerback Terrion Arnold was carted off the field with a foot injury.

The Lions won’t have any Hall of Famers coming out of retirement to help their playoff push, but they did welcome back linebacker Alex Anzalone on Sunday, to great effect. They could get running back David Montgomery back soon. They won’t lose any more players in a wild-card game, at least.

Even with the Lions’ injuries, winning two games at home after a one-week break feels so much more attainable than, say, heading on the road for a bad-weather game at Philadelphia or even returning to Minnesota.

Advertisement

“They hadn’t had a bye since Week 5, and it felt they were really limping,” an exec from another team said, “so this was a huge win for them.”

The job Lions defensive coordinator Aaron Glenn did in holding Minnesota to its third-worst offensive EPA game of the Kevin O’Connell era (minus-16.3, per TruMedia) went beyond Darnold simply having an off night. Detroit seemed extra physical with the Vikings’ receivers but didn’t incur penalties the way the Lions did when playing with aggression against Seattle’s wideouts in a Week 4 shootout victory. Can that carry over?

• How Vikings compare: Losing to Detroit by three touchdowns dropped Minnesota’s point differential to plus-100 for the season. That ranks 61st out of 249 wild-card teams since 1970, per Pro Football Reference — pretty good, but not up there with most of the wild-card teams that won it all.

The table below shows where the 2024 wild cards rank in regular-season point differential among the last 249 wild-card entrants. I’ve included the seven wild-card teams that won Super Bowls and the three that got there and lost.

Advertisement

2024 Wild-Card Teams vs. Super Bowl Versions

WC Team Point Diff Playoffs

+185 (1st of 249)

Won SB (4-0)

+168 (4th)

Won SB (4-0)

Advertisement

+148 (10th)

Won SB (4-0)

+137 (20th)

Won SB (4-0)

+131 (27)

Advertisement

Won SB (4-0)

+122 (38th)

TBD

+114 (46th)

TBD

Advertisement

+101 (60th)

TBD

+100 (61st)

TBD

+98 (64th)

Advertisement

Lost SB (3-1)

+94 (69th)

TBD

+72 (105th)

Lost SB (3-1)

Advertisement

+68 (113th)

Lost SB (3-1)

+58 (127th)

Won SB (4-0)

+33 (156th)

Advertisement

TBD

+22 (173rd)

Won SB (4-0)

Four of the seven wild-card teams to win Super Bowls ranked among the top 27 in regular-season point differential. Jim Plunkett’s 1980 Oakland Raiders and Eli Manning’s 2007 New York Giants won it all despite ranking near the bottom, with the slumping 2024 Pittsburgh Steelers.

The Packers, Chargers and Broncos rank higher in differential than the Vikings, despite Minnesota’s superior record (14-3).

Advertisement

After watching Darnold struggle Sunday, that doesn’t feel so wrong.

The Vikings were coming off a loss to Detroit when they traveled to face the Rams and lost a Thursday night game in Week 8. Teams are 6-10 with a minus-108 point differential in their next game after playing the Lions this season. Three of the six wins were against New England, another was against Chicago and another was against Dallas without Dak Prescott.

Is there anything to the post-Lions hangover? Minnesota has extra time to prepare for the Rams this time. The Vikings-Rams game isn’t until Monday night.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

NFL playoff schedule: Game times, channels for wild-card weekend

• System failure? The Vikings finished three games better than the Rams in the standings, and the gap appears larger when measured by point differential. At minus-19, the Rams tied for the sixth-worst point differential of any division winner in NFL history. (The 2024 Houston Texans are 19th on that list with a differential of 0.)

Advertisement

Where’s the outrage? The Vikings’ rough showing against the Lions might quiet complaints over a 14-3 team heading on the road in the wild-card round.

“I don’t think you rectify it,” an exec from a non-playoff team said. “It creates too much great conversation.”

Four of the five division winners with the worst regular-season point differentials won their home playoff game: the 2010 Seahawks, 2011 Broncos, 2016 Texans and 2014 Panthers. Two others among the 20 worst (the 2008 Cardinals and 2011 Giants) reached the Super Bowl, with the Giants (minus-6 differential) winning it all.

Had the Lions, perceived as one of the NFL’s best teams all season, lost Sunday and wound up visiting L.A., perhaps there would be more support for reconsidering the current playoff format. It’s a tough break for the Vikings but also an outlier — the product of a historic division.

• Rams didn’t care about the big, bad North: Led by the 15-2 Lions, 14-3 Vikings and 11-6 Packers, the 2024 NFC North proved to be the most dominant division in more than a half-century. Teams from the North outscored their non-division opponents by 384 points across 44 games. That per-game average (8.7) ranked first among 376 divisions since 1970, also per Pro Football Reference.

Advertisement
scatter visualization

The Rams could have avoided the North in the wild-card round by beating Seattle in Week 18, drawing Washington instead. But coach Sean McVay prioritized resting starters, including 36-year-old quarterback Matthew Stafford, for good reason. The Rams played the Lions tough on the road in Week 1, falling 26-20 in overtime. They beat Minnesota 30-20 in Week 8.

“I like McVay’s whole thing,” a coach from another team said. “He’s like, ‘No matter what, we are going to have to be a really good version of ourself at home. I can’t worry about other people. I need to get our health optimized.’”

• As for the Packers: While McVay felt time off would help his aging quarterback be his best for the playoffs, his former understudy, Matt LaFleur, figured his young quarterback, Jordan Love, could use the reps in Week 18. Both teams had already secured playoff spots, so there was only the potential for seeding at stake.

As things turned out, Green Bay was going to be the seventh seed in the NFC with a win or defeat Sunday. But with the team suffering key injuries to Christian Watson (likely out for the season) and Love (should be OK for playoffs), and with LaFleur admittedly botching game management as Chicago claimed a walk-off victory at Lambeau Field, this game had ramifications.

The already bad optics appeared worse after Bears special teams coach Richard Hightower, who worked with LaFleur in Washington more than a decade ago, schemed a punt-return touchdown with an old trick — the misdirection return.

It’s all good for Green Bay if the team wins in the playoffs, but narratives surrounding teams can change quickly, especially in the postseason. The Packers and Vikings could find that out quickly. The NFC North’s record point differential isn’t going to help LaFleur manage games or Darnold throw more accurately.

2. Fox’s Jay Glazer suggested teams could seek to acquire Kevin O’Connell from the Vikings in the offseason. Here’s why the idea seems credible within the league.

Glazer’s reports are interesting because he’s selective, weighing in only on the big stuff. Some dismissed when Glazer suggested years ago that the New York Giants might trade young superstar receiver Odell Beckham Jr., but then the Giants did trade Beckham.

Advertisement

Glazer isn’t saying O’Connell will be traded. He’s saying the idea is on other teams’ radar.

Why would other teams think they might have a shot at acquiring O’Connell, who is beloved in Minnesota and seems to love coaching the Vikings? Because other teams think three things as O’Connell enters the final year of his contract in 2025:

• That O’Connell deserves outsized credit for the team’s success, not just for his work with Darnold, but also for his hiring of defensive coordinator Brian Flores and his overall success in the absence of strong drafting;

• That O’Connell is in a great position to seek additional power under terms of any new deal;

Advertisement

• That Vikings ownership might not grant O’Connell that kind of power and/or the type of money O’Connell might command elsewhere.

Teams therefore sense the potential for opportunity.

There is another part of the equation that must be discussed.

How executives from other teams view Vikings general manager Kwesi Adofo-Mensah informs how they see O’Connell’s situation in Minnesota. Many longtime NFL evaluators scoffed privately when the Vikings hired Adofo-Mensah, a former Wall Street commodities trader who played basketball at Princeton and did not have a traditional scouting background, as their GM. Adofo-Mensah then took the lead in the search that resulted in O’Connell’s hiring.

Those executives now see the Vikings’ struggles in the draft as justifying their skepticism. If they were in O’Connell’s position, they would use their leverage to forge a direct link with ownership.

Advertisement

“Which business guy do you want making your evaluation: the GM or the owner?” a veteran coach asked.

How coaches and executives from other teams view things is interesting and can be instructive, but it isn’t what matters. O’Connell will decide what’s important to him. How things shake out will reveal to what extent his view aligns with the views held by other football people in the league.

3. The Bengals missed the playoffs with superstars Joe Burrow, Ja’Marr Chase and Trey Hendrickson enjoying elite individual seasons. Was it only a temporary setback or is Burrow on the Carson Palmer frustration train?

Finishing 9-8 and out of the playoffs with Burrow tossing 43 touchdown passes, Chase topping 1,700 yards and Hendrickson collecting 17.5 sacks once would have seemed impossible. It happened.

The Bengals spent Sunday hoping Kansas City and the Jets would win so they could reach the playoffs. It had to be a powerless feeling as the Chiefs rested starters and lost big, ending Cincinnati’s season.

Burrow might feel similarly powerless entering an offseason that could be pivotal for the Bengals. He’s lobbying for the team to keep receiver Tee Higgins in particular.

Advertisement

“You don’t want to make a living out of letting great players walk away,” Burrow said Tuesday. “That’s why you try to get those deals done early.”

The Bengals are not known for getting deals done early. Burrow knows this. He wants to change this.

Burrow doubled down Saturday after keeping alive the Bengals’ playoff hopes, if only temporarily, with a victory over the Steelers.

What happens if Higgins leaves and the Bengals regress on offense? What happens if their defense, which has fallen off after safety Jessie Bates, tackle D.J. Reader and others departed, continues to slide? It ranked 29th in EPA per play this season despite a late rally against poor offenses. (Update: Defensive coordinator Lou Anarumo was fired Monday, sources told The Athletic.)

Palmer made 99 regular-season and postseason starts with the Bengals before growing so frustrated with the organization that he held out and forced a trade. Burrow is 76 starts into his career and hinting at some frustration over the team letting Higgins reach the brink of free agency, with Chase due for a market-setting extension.

visualization

The chart above compares the career timelines for Burrow and Palmer, showing how many games above and below .500 they were along the way.

Palmer generally enjoyed strong weaponry until No. 2 receiver T.J. Houshmandzadeh departed as a free agent in 2009, a year after top wideout Chad Ochocinco tried to force the team into trading him. The current situation is not the same, but what happens with Chase and Higgins surely will affect Burrow’s outlook on the future.

4. Here’s what makes sense for the Patriots after they moved on from Jerod Mayo following one season.

The Patriots were not the first franchise to have an in-house head-coach-in-waiting for when their legendary power coach retired or was let go.

Advertisement

The Seattle Seahawks did something similar when they named the younger Jim Mora as their coach-in-waiting under Mike Holmgren. The team owner at the time, the late Paul Allen, preferred hiring high-profile power coaches. But he went with Mora to succeed Holmgren in 2009. The arrangement lasted a single season before Allen landed a bigger name: Pete Carroll.

When Patriots owner Robert Kraft designated Mayo as Bill Belichick’s replacement in waiting, I questioned whether Mayo would become a placeholder for an owner in transition. Kraft likes taking big swings, but after tiring of Belichick’s autocratic approach, his priority for the 2024 season was simply regaining control of his franchise. Hiring Mayo let him do that.

Two things Kraft did not expect happened in the meantime.

• Mayo struggled in his first season on the job, making it appear he might need years to develop.

• Kraft’s own Hall of Fame candidacy faltered amid what was perceived as efforts by him to prime his chances at Belichick’s expense.

Advertisement

Kraft turns 84 in June. His team has gone six seasons without winning a playoff game. The Patriots have only one playoff appearance in their past five seasons. From Kraft’s standpoint, waiting to see whether Mayo develops into a good coach could feel riskier than plugging in a finished product — especially when multiple finished products are available.

Mike Vrabel was the obvious candidate to replace Belichick one year ago, except for the fact that Kraft had already committed to Mayo.

Vrabel remains available and would seem to fit well.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Mike Vrabel, Brian Flores and the top candidates to be the Patriots’ next head coach

Carroll is another intriguing possibility. He’s a power coach with people skills, an unwaveringly positive outlook and unfinished business in New England.

Advertisement

Kraft hired Carroll to replace Bill Parcells in 1997. Carroll posted a 27-21 (.563) record with two playoff appearances. Kraft fired him and later lamented that he hadn’t given Carroll the power the coach needed to shape the roster. Kraft had regretted giving so much power to Parcells, so he withheld it from his next coach, Carroll. He regretted not giving Carroll a fair shake.

Carroll turns 74 in September. Some might consider that too old for the job. What does the 83-year-old Kraft think?

Mike McCarthy is another potential candidate who could make sense for Kraft or any owner looking for a finished product. McCarthy’s contract with the Cowboys expires Jan. 14. He could sign an extension or become available.

Owners sometimes pivot from one extreme to the next. Kraft did that when he pivoted from Parcells to Carroll. He did it again when he pivoted from Carroll to Belichick, and again when he pivoted from Belichick to Mayo. With Mayo out, it’s difficult to imagine Kraft making another speculative bet on an unproven candidate. He’ll want a surer thing and will find it in Vrabel, Carroll, McCarthy or another seasoned coach.

Advertisement

“Kraft was not going to fire Mayo unless he gets Vrabel, Carroll or some other clear upgrade,” an exec from another team said.

5. The Philadelphia Eagles rested Saquon Barkley in Week 18, leaving him 100 yards short of Eric Dickerson’s single-season rushing record. That makes comparing them easier.

The date was Nov. 11, 1984, and Eric Dickerson was facing a Chicago Bears defense allowing 79 rushing yards per game and 3.4 per carry, both league-leading figures. Buddy Ryan was Chicago’s defensive coordinator. Dan Hampton and Leslie Frazier were injured, but this was still an elite Bears defense with Mike Singletary, Richard Dent, Steve McMichael, Otis Wilson and Gary Fencik in the lineup that day.

Dickerson, in his second season, rushed for 149 yards and two fourth-quarter touchdowns in a 29-13 Rams victory.

Also that season, Dickerson had a 120-yard game against Lawrence Taylor’s New York Giants. He was the only 100-yard rusher against the Cleveland Browns, meaning Dickerson hit triple digits against formidable defenses coached by Buddy Ryan (Bears), Belichick (Giants) and Marty Schottenheimer (Browns).

These were among the signature performances for Dickerson on his way to 2,105 yards, which broke the record O.J. Simpson set in 14 games and remains untouched with Barkley sitting out Sunday.

Advertisement

If you didn’t see Dickerson play, you might not realize the gifts he brought to the game. He stood 6-foot-3, weighed 230 pounds, clocked 4.4 seconds in the 40 and had what other great running backs — Simpson, Jim Brown — called elite vision. The 9.4-second time he ran to win Texas’ high school state title in the 100-yard dash converts to 10.28 over 100 meters. That’s the time Tyreek Hill ran to win the 2012 IAAF World Junior Championships.

Dickerson had more rushing yards than anyone through the first 16, 32, 48, 64, 80, 96, 112 and 128 games of a career. He slipped to second behind Barry Sanders through 144 games and retired after playing 146.

Advertisement
Dickerson Game # Barkley

1,808 (1)

First 16

1,307 (27)

3,913 (1)

First 32

Advertisement

2,370 (45)

5,418 (1)

First 48

3,400 (52)

7,207 (1)

Advertisement

First 64

4,533 (52)

8,886 (1)

First 80

5,869 (45)

Advertisement

10,396 (1)

First 96

TBD

11,612 (1)

First 112

Advertisement

TBD

12,525 (1)

First 128

TBD

13,255 (2)

Advertisement

First 144

TBD

Dickerson did these things in an era when top backs got more carries against defenses that sold out to stop the run, under rules allowing greater violence.

“He was hit so hard on every play, it almost sounded like they had turned up the microphones on the field,” Rams coach John Robinson said after the 1984 game against the Bears.

For Barkley to swerve into Dickerson territory even briefly is impressive.

Advertisement

Dickerson, like Barkley this season, played 16 games in 1984. Both backs ran behind talented, mostly veteran blockers led by acclaimed line coaches (Jeff Stoutland for the Eagles, Hudson Houck for the Rams). Dickerson’s interior linemen that season combined for 17 career Pro Bowls. Robinson was the perfect coach for him.

The table below shows how Dickerson and Barkley stack up in their signature seasons. It ranks their yardage totals from highest to lowest by opponent. The numbers in parenthesis show where each single-game total ranked against that particular opponent in that season. I’ve excluded 2024 Week 18 to keep the number of games equal.

Barkley vs. Dickerson: Rush yds rank vs. opponents

1984 Opp Dickerson Barkley 2024 Opp

HOU

215 (1)

Advertisement

255 (1)

LAR

STL

208 (1)

176 (1)

Advertisement

NYG

TB

191 (1)

167 (1)

DAL

Advertisement

NO

175 (1)

159 (1)

JAX

NO

Advertisement

149 (2)

150 (1)

WAS

CHI

149 (4)

Advertisement

147 (1)

NO

ATL

145 (1)

146 (2)

Advertisement

WAS

DAL

138 (4)

124 (5)

CAR

Advertisement

GB

132 (3)

109 (2)

GB

NYG

Advertisement

120 (1)

108 (3)

CIN

ATL

107 (6)

Advertisement

107 (1)

BAL

CLE

102 (1)

95 (2)

Advertisement

ATL

SF

98 (4)

84 (4)

TB

Advertisement

CIN

89 (4)

66 (11)

DAL

PIT

Advertisement

49 (13)

65 (7)

PIT

SF

38 (15)

Advertisement

47 (15)

CLE

Dickerson had seven games in which his yardage total was the most that a given opponent allowed all season. Barkley also had seven such games, led by his 255-yard game against Dickerson’s former team, the Rams, and a 176-yard game against his own former team, the Giants.

Barkley was the only 100-yard rusher against Baltimore. No other runner topped 63 yards against the Ravens.

The average (3.6) and median (2.0) rankings for Barkley’s performances were higher than Dickerson’s average (3.9) and median (2.5). He also had the edge in yards per carry (5.8 to 5.6). Dickerson had a 2-1 lead in 200-yard games and shined against those legendary defenses. His record will stand for at least another season.

Advertisement

6. Two-minute drill: Baker Mayfield and Bucs offense

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers have the only offense since at least 2000 to meet or exceed the following marks over a full season:

• 28 points per game (28.6 for Tampa)
• 6.0 yards per play (6.2)
• 65 percent red zone touchdown rate (66.7)
• 50 percent third-down conversion rate (50.9)

There have been 798 offenses since 2000.

Thirty-nine of the 798 scored at least 28 points per game on offense (excludes points scored on defense/special teams).

Thirty of those 39 averaged at least 6.0 yards per play.

Advertisement

Eighteen of those 30 converted red zone possessions to touchdowns at least 65 percent of the time.

Of those 18, only 2024 Tampa Bay converted at least half of its third-down tries.

This was an offense featuring a first-time coordinator (Liam Coen) and a quarterback (Baker Mayfield) all 32 teams could have signed in free agency multiple times in recent years.

Posting that type of production while reaching the playoffs and making sure franchise icon Mike Evans reached 1,000 yards for an 11th consecutive year, tying Jerry Rice’s record, made Week 18 a great one for the Buccaneers, even if they struggled early in their 27-19 victory over New Orleans.

• Young and Stroud revisited: The Houston Texans are headed for the playoffs, but they cannot be happy about quarterback C.J. Stroud’s sophomore slump. The Carolina Panthers are finished for the season with a 5-12 record, but they must be thrilled with where their second-year quarterback, Bryce Young, appears headed after passing for 251 yards and scoring five total touchdowns (three passing, two rushing) in a 44-38 overtime victory over the Falcons on Sunday.

Advertisement

“(Young) looks more comfortable and is making better decisions, like the edge is off him,” an exec from another team said.

No one could have seen this coming when Young, the first pick in the 2023 draft, and Stroud, the second pick, entered this season, and especially not after Young was benched following Week 2. But as the table below shows, Young has outproduced Stroud over the final nine games of the regular season. He completed 25 of 34 passes for 251 yards against the Falcons.

Role reversal: Bryce Young vs. C.J. Stroud, final 9 games

Advertisement
QB Young Stroud

Cmp-att

173-282

159-266

Cmp%

61.3%

Advertisement

59.8%

Yards/game

208.9

197.7

Yards/att

Advertisement

6.7

6.7

TD-INT

13-4

9-8

Advertisement

Rating

90.4

78.5

Sacked

20

Advertisement

30

Sack %

6.6%

10.1%

Pressure/sk %

Advertisement

15.2%

24.2%

EPA/pass play

+0.09

-0.10

Advertisement

Tm OFF EPA

34.2

-58.5

Tm DEF/ST EPA

-80.1

Advertisement

+49.5

W-L

4-5

4-5

I’ll be interested to see what the Texans do in the offseason if Stroud and their offense struggle in a one-and-done playoff situation. They’ve gone from having the hottest young quarterback and one of the hottest coordinators in Bobby Slowik to being a team that wins on defense, in spite of its offense. Things change quickly in the NFL. Young and the Panthers can attest to that.

Advertisement

• Seattle’s expensive win: Geno Smith took tons of punishment during the season as the Seahawks leaned heavily into the pass behind a shaky offensive line and without a reliable ground game.

While a case could be made that the approach contributed to Seattle slipping in the offensive rankings and missing the playoffs, Smith got his reward Sunday. He collected $6 million in incentives after hitting career highs for passing yards and completion rate while the team won 10 games.

That last part — winning 10 games — was supposed to protect the team from Smith piling up stats in a less-than-meaningful context. But the 10 wins weren’t enough for Seattle to reach the playoffs. The Seahawks barely got their 10th win to finish 10-7 even though the Rams were resting key starters Sunday.

This was about the worst way Smith could collect on the incentives, in other words. But a deal is a deal.

• Jets by far most improved offense: Even before Aaron Rodgers tossed four touchdown passes Sunday, the Jets ranked No. 1 by a wide margin in year-over-year gain for offensive EPA per game.

Advertisement

The table below shows the top five teams by this measure. All but the Buccaneers were poor on offense last season. That makes Tampa Bay’s appearance on this list remarkable. The Bucs were good enough on offense last season for offensive coordinator Dave Canales to land a head-coaching job with Carolina, and they still improved a tick more than Carolina did.

(Photo of Dan Campbell, right, and Kevin O’Connell: Kevin Sabitus / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Sports

Wings rookie Azzi Fudd sets dubious WNBA record with lowest-scoring debut by top pick

Published

on

Wings rookie Azzi Fudd sets dubious WNBA record with lowest-scoring debut by top pick

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The highly anticipated 30th WNBA season tipped off Friday with three games, including the expansion Toronto Tempo’s first-ever contest.

The action continued Saturday with a full slate, including Caitlin Clark’s return after an injury-riddled sophomore season.

Clark and the Indiana Fever hosted the Dallas Wings on Saturday afternoon in a matchup featuring the four most recent No. 1 overall picks. The Wings outlasted the Fever 107-104, but the game was defined by Azzi Fudd’s — the most recent top pick — underwhelming debut.

Advertisement

Dallas Wings guards Azzi Fudd and Paige Bueckers react during the first half of the Fever’s season opener at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis on May 9, 2026. (Grace Smith/IndyStar / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images)

Fudd played 18 minutes off the bench, scoring three points — the lowest ever by a No. 1 overall pick in a WNBA debut.

Wings coach Jose Fernandez addressed Fudd’s performance after the game, encouraging the rookie to, “Keep doing what she’s doing, it’s her first year in the league. We got five really talented backcourt players.”

EX-WNBA STAR CRITICAL OF SKY ROOKIE HAILEY VAN LITH, BELIEVES POPULARITY PLAYED ROLE IN DRAFT SELECTION

In addition to Fudd, Dallas’ backcourt features last year’s top draft pick Paige Bueckers, last season’s No. 12 overall pick Aziaha James, four-time All-Star Arike Ogunbowale and starting guard Odyssey Sims.

Advertisement

Until Saturday, Kelsey Plum held the record for the lowest-scoring debut by a No. 1 pick. Selected first overall by the then-San Antonio Stars in 2017, she scored just four points in her debut. The Stars relocated to Las Vegas in 2018 and was subsequently rebranded as the Aces.

Dallas Wings guard Azzi Fudd warms up before the game against the Indiana Fever at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis, Indiana, on May 9, 2026. (Michael Hickey/Getty Images)

Despite the slow start to her first season in the league, Plum ended the year with All-Rookie team honors. In the years since, she’s been named to four All-Star teams and won two championships with the Aces.

The Wings’ decision to take Fudd with the No. 1 overall pick drew controversy, raising questions about whether Bueckers’ personal relationship with her influenced the selection. Late last month, Bueckers said last month it did not.

Azzi Fudd poses with WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert after being selected first overall by the Dallas Wings during the 2026 WNBA Draft at The Shed in New York City on April 13, 2026. (Angelina Katsanis/Getty Images)

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“Azzi Fudd was the No. 1 draft pick because she earned it, and it had nothing to do with me and everything to do with who she is as a human being, who she is as a basketball player,” Bueckers said, according to ESPN.

Neither Bueckers nor Fudd has publicly updated their relationship status since the April draft.

“Quite frankly, I believe me and Azzi’s personal relationship is nobody’s business but our own,” Bueckers also said in April. “And what we choose to share is completely up to us.”

Next up, the Wings play their home opener on Tuesday when they host the Atlanta Dream.

Advertisement

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Lakers drop Game 3 to Thunder; now one loss from elimination

Published

on

Lakers drop Game 3 to Thunder; now one loss from elimination

The Lakers are one playoff defeat from their season being over and from the conversation turning to LeBron James’ future.

They are in a hole no team has climbed out of in the history of the NBA, the Lakers’ 131-108 loss to the Oklahoma City Thunder in Game 3 putting L.A. down 3-0 in the best-of-seven Western Conference semifinal series.

James and his teammates gave a gallant effort Saturday night at Crypto.com Arena, but the defending champion proved to be more than the Lakers could handle.

James finished his night with 19 points on seven-for-19 shooting, eight assists and six rebounds. Rui Hachimura had 21 points and Austin Reaves finished with 17 points and nine assists.

Even so, the Lakers have now lost all three games by double digits.

Advertisement

And the Lakers are fully aware that no NBA team has successfully come back from a 3-0 deficit in the playoffs, with those teams holding a 161-0 record. Only four teams have forced a Game 7 after trailing 3-0, all of which ultimately lost the series, including the Boston Celtics in 2023.

Lakers forward LeBron James shows frustration as Thunder center Chet Holmgren slam dunks during Game 3 on Saturday night.

(Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)

Game 4 is Monday night, when the Lakers will try to stave off elimination and a night that will determine how the conversations go with James if they lose.

Advertisement

James has been frequently asked this season about retirement, but he has not given any indication of what the future holds for him.

He’s 41 years old and playing in an NBA-record 23rd season.

James is in the final year of his contract that pays him $52 million, making him a free agent this offseason. He can retire, join another team or perhaps return to the Lakers next season.

That will be the conversation if the Lakers can’t win Game 4.

They will see the same Thunder team that had seven players score in double figures, led by Ajay Mitchell’s 24 points and 10 assists and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s 23 points and nine assists.

Advertisement

The Lakers went down 13 in the third quarter and had to play catchup the rest of the way. They never did, going down by 112-94 with 6 minutes and 12 seconds left, forcing Lakers coach JJ Redick to call a timeout.

The deficit just kept growing, topping out at 27 points in the fourth.

They were outscored 33-20 in the third quarter. The Lakers didn’t take care of the basketball in the third, turning it over six times, and they didn’t play good defense, allowing the Thunder to shoot 59.1% from the field and 55.6 percent from three-point range,

The Lakers did not give an inch to the Thunder in the first half, even when they fell behind by 10 points.

Advertisement

They just kept grinding until they led 59-57 at halftime.

Hachimura had 16 points in the first half, continuing his hot three-point shooting by making all four of his threes. Luke Kennard came off the bench to give the Lakers 13 points, shooting five for six from the field and three for four from three-point range.

The Lakers kept the pressure defense on Gilgeous-Alexander. Though he had 14 points in the first half, he shot only four for 14 from the field and one for five from three-point range.

The Lakers shot 55% from three-point range in the first half, which went a long way in helping them.

The Lakers lost the first two games by identical margins of 18 points and each loss was magnified because Gilgeous-Alexander was kept under wraps for the most part by L.A.’s defense.

Advertisement

When Gilgeous-Alexander picked up his fourth foul with 10:34 left in the third quarter of Game 2 and went to the bench, the Thunder turned a five-point lead into a 13-point advantage at the end of the quarter.

So, when he wasn’t on the court, the Lakers failed to take advantage.

“Well, you know, again, I’ll repeat what I said after the game: we’ve got to be better in the non-Shai minutes,” Lakers coach JJ Redick said.

Role players like Mitchell and Jared McCain hurt the Lakers in the second game. Chet Holmgren also was hard to deal with.

“Mitchell and McCain have hurt us in those non-Shai minutes, and then Chet [Holmgren] has hurt us the whole game,” Redick said. “I think you’ve got to be willing to live with something. Shai playing one-on-one, thus far in the series, we haven’t been willing to live with, so you’re going to be in rotation. That can lead to smalls on bigs at the hole, and the offensive rebounding from Chet has really hurt us.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

2026 INDYCAR Odds: Alex Palou Clear Favorite for Sonsio Grand Prix at IMS

Published

on

2026 INDYCAR Odds: Alex Palou Clear Favorite for Sonsio Grand Prix at IMS

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

In 2025, Alex Palou kicked off the Month of May with a Sonsio Grand Prix win at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway road course. 

Based on the odds, it’s likely that Palou will find himself in Winner’s Circle again this Saturday when INDYCAR goes back to IMS on May 9 (4:30 p.m. ET, FOX).

Considering Palou has already captured the checkered flag three times this season, are there any other drivers whose odds are worth a wager?

Here are the latest lines at DraftKings Sportsbook as of May 9.

Advertisement

This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX Sports may be compensated. Read more about Sports Betting on FOX Sports.

Sonsio Grand Prix 2026

Àlex Palou: 5/18 (bet $10 to win $12.78 total)
Kyle Kirkwood: 5/1 (bet $10 to win $60 total)
Pato O’Ward: 12/1 (bet $10 to win $130 total)
David Malukas: 14/1 (bet $10 to win $150 total)
Josef Newgarden: 16/1 (bet $10 to win $170 total)
Scott McLaughlin: 20/1 (bet $10 to win $210 total)
Christian Lundgaard: 30/1 (bet $10 to win $310 total)
Scott Dixon: 40/1 (bet $10 to win $410 total)
Will Power: 60/1 (bet $10 to win $610 total)
Felix Rosenqvist: 80/1 (bet $10 to win $810 total)
Alexander Rossi: 100/1 (bet $10 to win $1,010 total)
Marcus Ericsson: 100/1 (bet $10 to win $1,010 total)
Marcus Armstrong: 100/1 (bet $10 to win $1,010 total)

Christian Rasmussen: 150/1 (bet $10 to win $1,510 total)
Graham Rahal: 150/1 (bet $10 to win $1,510 total)
Louis Foster: 300/1 (bet $10 to win $3,010 total)
Dennis Hauger: 500/1 (bet $10 to win $5,010 total)
Romain Grosjean: 500/1 (bet $10 to win $5,010 total)
Santino Ferrucci: 500/1 (bet $10 to win $5,010 total)
Rinus Veekay: 500/1 (bet $10 to win $5,010 total)
Kyffin Simpson: 500/1 (bet $10 to win $5,010 total)
Caio Collet: 1000/1 (bet $10 to win $10,010 total)
Sting Ray Robb: 1000/1 (bet $10 to win $10,010 total)
Nolan Siegel: 1000/1 (bet $10 to win $10,010 total)
Mick Schumacher: 1000/1 (bet $10 to win $10,010 total)

Here’s what to know about the oddsboard:

Advertisement

Heavy Favorite: It doesn’t look like Alex Palou’s dominance will be slowing down anytime soon. As noted above, he’s already won three of the five races since the INDYCAR season started in March. With 186 laps led, Palou sits first in the standings and has the shortest odds to win the title again. Last season, he started from the pole and led 29 laps before winning the race.

Long Shot to Watch: While his odds of 150/1 to win at IMS are much longer than Palou’s, Graham Rahal is one to watch. At this race in 2025, he started second and led 49 laps before finishing sixth. He finished second at this course in 2015, 2020 and 2023. He’s currently 10th in the INDYCAR standings, with one top five and three top 10s.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending