Connect with us

Maine

Maine electricity bills increased again this month

Published

on

Maine electricity bills increased again this month


Central Maine Power Co. customers began paying 7% more in their monthly bills Jan. 1 to help fund $3.3 billion of upgrades to transmission lines, poles and other equipment in New England. Versant Power ratepayers can also expect increases, though smaller, later this year.

Federal regulators are apportioning about $280 million of the region’s costs to Maine’s two major utilities, with the remainder assigned to utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. The costs are divided based on load, or how much electricity each service area uses.

Consumer advocates in the region have criticized the practice of assigning transmission costs to ratepayers, saying upgrades proposed by utilities are often unnecessary, insufficiently regulated and enhance the value of assets for shareholders at the expense of customers.

“The ratepayers are the only wallets in the room,” said Donald M. Kreis, New Hampshire’s consumer advocate who says poles, wires and other components of transmission are overbuilt.

Advertisement

As an example, one energy company proposed rebuilding a 49-mile transmission line in New Hampshire for $384 million, when less than 8% of it needed to be replaced, according to consumer advocates.

Versant said transmission rates are set by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission “using a preset formula and cover needed investments” in local transmission and regional investments.

“Most of the transmission rate increase is due to Versant paying our share to support regional transmission projects as part of our ISO-New England membership,” it said in an emailed statement.

CMP spokesman Jon Breed said ratepayer-funded spending authorized by FERC “will help reduce outages and protect our system from the threats of extreme weather in Maine.” New England’s transmission is a nearly 9,000-mile system, he said.

How the money in its entirety will eventually be spent is unclear. Eversource Energy, the parent company of utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, has plans for numerous projects, such as a partial line rebuild and other work totaling nearly $80 million in Connecticut, and a $7.4 million rebuild of a substation in Massachusetts.

Advertisement

“We’re responsible for maintaining just under half of the regional transmission system in New England and are constantly working to upgrade and modernize the transmission system, making the electric grid more resilient to increasing extreme weather caused by climate change and improving reliability for customers across New England,” Eversource spokeswoman Jamie Ratliff said in an email.

A representative of National Grid, parent company of New England Power Co., which said its revenue requirement is $485.4 million this year, did not respond to an emailed request for information about its projects.

CMP customers who use an average of 550 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month are paying $149.83, up from $139.62 in 2024, according to the Maine Office of the Public Advocate. Versant customers in the Bangor Hydro District who use the same amount of power pay $155.80, up from $148.09, a 5.2% increase, the utility said. Customers in Versant’s Maine Public District in the northern reaches of the state pay $146.37, an increase from $144.35.

Utilities in New England say “revenue requirements” of $3.3 billion are needed for 2025, up more than 16% from last year, according to the New England Power Pool, or NEPOOL, an advisory group of utilities, consumer advocates, consumers and others.  

Together, CMP and Versant account for 8.4% of the revenue needed in the region for the transmission upgrades, as identified by the utilities. In contrast, subsidiaries of Eversource Energy account for nearly 59%, or about $1.9 billion.

Advertisement

Increased rates for consumers are not due solely to transmission costs. Utilities also are collecting more than $254 million, including interest, to compensate for previous under-collecting of revenue based on the difference between cost forecasts and actual costs last year.

Ratiliff said the rate change is “largely the result” of utilities recovering less of their 2023 transmission costs.

Still, the largest driver of higher rates that took effect Wednesday is significant construction by utilities and replacing older transmission equipment, Landry said.

“They figured out they can build stuff and send the bills and everyone has to pay them,” he said.

The transmission costs will overwhelm a slight decline in electricity bills approved by Maine regulators in November. A lower 2025 standard offer rate — the default supply price for most home and small-business customers who don’t buy electricity with competitive energy providers – reflects stable natural gas prices, the main driver of power generation in New England.

Advertisement

Seth Berry, a former state legislator who chaired the Legislature’s Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee and is critical of the performance of investor-owned utilities, said scrutiny by state regulators could uncover weaknesses in the argument for transmission upgrades and force utilities to scale back their plans.

The lure of profitability is difficult for utilities to resist and the result, he said, is “a race to a very expensive and overbuilt transmission network.”

Utilities should instead focus on repairing and upgrading “very creaky” distribution systems, he said. The networks of roadside power lines is most vulnerable to storms and potential damage that knocks out power.



Source link

Advertisement

Maine

Former police recruit sues Maine Criminal Justice Academy

Published

on

Former police recruit sues Maine Criminal Justice Academy


A former police recruit is suing the Maine Criminal Justice Academy for removing him and revoking his certification after he was accused of groping a female cadet during a training exercise in 2024.

The lawsuit was filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Bangor on behalf of Lincoln resident David Peters, a former part-time officer who was pursuing credentials to be a full-time law enforcement officer at the Maine Criminal Justice Academy in Vassalboro in 2024.

During a training session that Oct. 29, Peters and other cadets were pepper-sprayed and then required to perform various tasks, according to the lawsuit, including performing knee strikes, reciting an oath, and searching and handcuffing fellow trainees.

Peters was searching a female cadet and allegedly dragged his hands up her legs, grabbed her breasts and had moved his hands to her groin and buttocks, according to accounts by the cadet included in the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Peters thought he was searching a male cadet due to the effects of the pepper spray, which included visual impairment, the lawsuit states. The lawsuit argues he followed a “standard male-subject search sequence.”

The lawsuit says that the female cadet, who was wearing shorts and a T-shirt, described the encounter as “incidental” and “incident to the training exercise” to others afterward, but upon reflection reported it to authorities the following day.

A review by the academy’s board stated that Peters’ conduct “constituted the Class D crime of assault” and that he engaged in “physical sexual harassment,” according to the lawsuit. Peters, who served as a part-time police officer in a number of Penobscot and Piscataquis county towns beginning in 2007, had his certifications revoked by the board in November.

However, Peters was never charged with a crime and should not have had his certifications revoked, the lawsuit argues, saying those claims “are constitutionally invalid.”

Peters is seeking to have the academy’s claims of the alleged “Class D crime” expunged from his record, according to the lawsuit, as well as for the restoration of his certifications and compensatory and punitive damages.

Advertisement

A dozen defendants are named in the lawsuit, including academy board members, administrators and other staff, in addition to 10 “John and Jane Does.”

A spokesperson for the Maine Department of Public Safety did not respond to a request for comment Monday night. Walter Foster, Peters’ attorney, was unavailable to speak Monday night.

Peters completed preservice school and was issued a certificate that made him eligible for part-time law enforcement work in 2007, according to the lawsuit. Since then, Peters has served with police departments in Lincoln, East Millinocket, Brownville and Milo. He also served with the University of Maine police department.

In 2014, Peters completed a training program to become a corrections officer, according to the lawsuit, and was employed by the Mountain View Youth Development Center from 2014 to 2017, and the Mountain View Correctional Facility from 2017 to 2022.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

When it comes to emergency shelter, Maine has a choice to make | Opinion

Published

on

When it comes to emergency shelter, Maine has a choice to make | Opinion


Katie Spencer-White is president and CEO of Mid-Maine Homeless Shelter & Services.

Back in January, like emergency shelter directors across the state, I fielded calls
from police and fire chiefs, civic leaders and concerned community members, all of whom were deeply worried about a severe drop in temperature that was anticipated, compounded by predictions of significant snowfall.

I reassure them: as with every winter storm, our doors are open, and no one will be turned
away.

But this service is not guaranteed. Too many of Maine’s emergency shelters are facing a
perilous future due to chronic underinvestment by federal, state and local policy makers,
and a philanthropic community that wants to solve systemic problems rather than address
never-ending emergencies like homelessness.

Advertisement

According to a 2024 study by MaineHousing, current state and federal funding for
emergency shelters in Maine is just $7.16 per night for a service that costs $102 per diem.
That means shelter providers must fundraise the rest, which is much harder than it used to be.

It should be an easy sell. As a community, we pride ourselves on looking out for one another, especially when winter sets in and the cold turns dangerous. The decision to sustain an emergency shelter is not just a charitable act; it is a moral responsibility rooted in compassion, dignity and common sense. It is also a decision that strengthens, rather than burdens, our local economy.

At its core, an emergency shelter reflects the simple belief that no one should risk serious injury or death from exposure because they lack safe shelter on the coldest nights of the year. When temperatures drop in Maine, exposure can become life-threatening within hours. Providing a warm, supervised space is the most basic expression of our shared humanity.

We do not ask whether someone “deserves” warmth, safety or life itself. We recognize that protecting human life is a value that transcends politics, income and circumstance. Beyond its moral necessity, the emergency shelter also makes sound economic sense for our community. Emergency services are expensive. When people are forced to remain outdoors in extreme cold, the result is often frostbite, hypothermia, emergency room visits, ambulance calls and hospital stays, all of which place far greater strain on taxpayer-funded systems than prevention ever does.

A single hospitalization can cost tens of thousands of dollars, while a night at an emergency shelter costs a fraction of that. Prevention is not only more humane; it is far more fiscally responsible.

Advertisement

Local businesses also benefit when the most vulnerable among us are supported rather than pushed into crisis. A healthier, safer community means fewer emergency disruptions for downtown businesses, fewer public safety calls that draw resources away from other needs and a more stable environment for commerce. When community systems work proactively, everyone benefits — from shop owners and employees to customers and visitors who expect safe, welcoming cities.

Some may worry that providing emergency shelter invites problems or encourages dependency. In reality, the opposite is true. Well-run emergency shelters are structured, supervised and time-limited responses to extreme circumstances. They improve public order, reduce unsafe encampments and connect people to existing local services. They are a stabilizing force, not a destabilizing one.

Ultimately, the question before us is what kind of community we want to be. Do we turn
away from people in crisis and absorb the far greater costs later — or do we act with foresight, compassion and integrity?

Supporting an emergency shelter says that we value human life, public safety and economic responsibility all at once. In moments of extreme cold, warmth becomes a public good. By providing it, we affirm that our community is both caring and wise — and that we understand the true cost of doing nothing.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Pedestrian killed in gas station parking lot crash in Waterville, Maine

Published

on

Pedestrian killed in gas station parking lot crash in Waterville, Maine


A pedestrian has died following a crash in a gas station parking lot in Waterville, Maine, late Sunday morning.

The Waterville Police Department says it responded around 11:20 a.m. to a fatal motor vehicle crash in the parking lot of The Big Apple Convenience Store, located at 364 Upper Main Street.

An initial investigation shows a vehicle was traveling east on Main Street when it left the roadway and struck another vehicle that was parked at a gas pump, police said. A pedestrian who was in the parking lot at the time was struck and pronounced dead at the scene.

The City of Waterville announced on Facebook around 1:18 p.m. that Main Street was closed between Waterville Commons Drive and Armory Road as police managed a crash scene. People were urged to avoid the area and seek an alternate route.

Advertisement

The eastbound section of Main Street remained shutdown for several hours, as Maine State Police responded to the scene to assist with crash reconstruction.

Waterville police said in an update at 4 p.m. that the road had reopened.

The names of those involved in the deadly crash are not being released at this time. It’s unclear what caused this incident, and police haven’t said if anyone will face charges.

An investigation is ongoing.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending