Connect with us

Maine

When it comes to emergency shelter, Maine has a choice to make | Opinion

Published

on

When it comes to emergency shelter, Maine has a choice to make | Opinion


Katie Spencer-White is president and CEO of Mid-Maine Homeless Shelter & Services.

Back in January, like emergency shelter directors across the state, I fielded calls
from police and fire chiefs, civic leaders and concerned community members, all of whom were deeply worried about a severe drop in temperature that was anticipated, compounded by predictions of significant snowfall.

I reassure them: as with every winter storm, our doors are open, and no one will be turned
away.

But this service is not guaranteed. Too many of Maine’s emergency shelters are facing a
perilous future due to chronic underinvestment by federal, state and local policy makers,
and a philanthropic community that wants to solve systemic problems rather than address
never-ending emergencies like homelessness.

Advertisement

According to a 2024 study by MaineHousing, current state and federal funding for
emergency shelters in Maine is just $7.16 per night for a service that costs $102 per diem.
That means shelter providers must fundraise the rest, which is much harder than it used to be.

It should be an easy sell. As a community, we pride ourselves on looking out for one another, especially when winter sets in and the cold turns dangerous. The decision to sustain an emergency shelter is not just a charitable act; it is a moral responsibility rooted in compassion, dignity and common sense. It is also a decision that strengthens, rather than burdens, our local economy.

At its core, an emergency shelter reflects the simple belief that no one should risk serious injury or death from exposure because they lack safe shelter on the coldest nights of the year. When temperatures drop in Maine, exposure can become life-threatening within hours. Providing a warm, supervised space is the most basic expression of our shared humanity.

We do not ask whether someone “deserves” warmth, safety or life itself. We recognize that protecting human life is a value that transcends politics, income and circumstance. Beyond its moral necessity, the emergency shelter also makes sound economic sense for our community. Emergency services are expensive. When people are forced to remain outdoors in extreme cold, the result is often frostbite, hypothermia, emergency room visits, ambulance calls and hospital stays, all of which place far greater strain on taxpayer-funded systems than prevention ever does.

A single hospitalization can cost tens of thousands of dollars, while a night at an emergency shelter costs a fraction of that. Prevention is not only more humane; it is far more fiscally responsible.

Advertisement

Local businesses also benefit when the most vulnerable among us are supported rather than pushed into crisis. A healthier, safer community means fewer emergency disruptions for downtown businesses, fewer public safety calls that draw resources away from other needs and a more stable environment for commerce. When community systems work proactively, everyone benefits — from shop owners and employees to customers and visitors who expect safe, welcoming cities.

Some may worry that providing emergency shelter invites problems or encourages dependency. In reality, the opposite is true. Well-run emergency shelters are structured, supervised and time-limited responses to extreme circumstances. They improve public order, reduce unsafe encampments and connect people to existing local services. They are a stabilizing force, not a destabilizing one.

Ultimately, the question before us is what kind of community we want to be. Do we turn
away from people in crisis and absorb the far greater costs later — or do we act with foresight, compassion and integrity?

Supporting an emergency shelter says that we value human life, public safety and economic responsibility all at once. In moments of extreme cold, warmth becomes a public good. By providing it, we affirm that our community is both caring and wise — and that we understand the true cost of doing nothing.

Advertisement



Source link

Maine

In Maine, Bobby Charles vs. Hannah Pingree is the race that matters | Opinion

Published

on

In Maine, Bobby Charles vs. Hannah Pingree is the race that matters | Opinion


Ralph Benko served as a deputy general counsel in the Reagan White House and worked closely with the George W. Bush administration as a contractor in its domestic policy initiative to find and rescue human trafficking victims. He lives in Maryland.

“As Maine goes, so goes the nation” was, for about a century, a political maxim. Recently, the political junkies in the capital were obsessing about the Platner vs. Collins race.

Wrong race!

Understandable, for those card-carrying members of the Columnist Party. The U.S. Senate majority, a very big deal, may hinge on that race. And that race was spiced up by the salacious and unseemly stories about the winner of the Democratic primary.

Advertisement

With that said, hey, junkies? Platner vs. Collins always was the wrong race to put on the marquee of your political theater. The real bellwether race  is the governor’s contest between Bobby Charles and Hannah Pingree.

The political dynamics that have emerged or are emerging is less Republican vs. Democrat and more establishment insiders (Hannah Pingree, former speaker of the Maine House, whose family name has been a prominent fixture in Maine politics for over 30 years) vs. popular insurgents (Bobby Charles, on his first electoral foray).

Charles is fashioning his affordability program via a classic center-right Republican free market platform. Pingree is fashioning her affordability solution via a classic center-left Democratic public works and pro-regulatory platform.

Full disclosure, as chairman of the 190,000-Facebook follower Capitalist League, I lean center-right. My own preferences revealed, there is more to this race than programmatic preferences.

The Charles vs. Pingree race is the perfect microcosm of the national political culture.

Advertisement

I was a lifelong Democrat until the sensible Democratic Party left me for left field. And there they go again. The progressive Mills-Pingree-Platner party ghosts the FDR/JFK/Bill Clinton Democrats. 

Bobby Charles — who worked in the Reagan White House and later directly for Colin Powell —  is a modern Reaganesque figure, aligning himself with the sensible Maine population, including independents and traditional Democrats, offering common-sense policies.

Charles is running on the Republican line. Yet he has the kind of “man of the people” values that FDR embodied and Middle America embodies. 

Yes, there is a lot of crazy going on in the GOP now. Charles, however, embodies classical Republican radical pragmatism. He’s not an ideologue, and is exempt from the fanaticism that so plagues our politics today. Charles is neither a zealot nor a moderate. He’s simply … capable.

Meanwhile the Democrats now, wholesale, are nominating “democratic socialists.” Wait, what? History has repeatedly shown that socialism doesn’t work, locally or nationally. 

Advertisement

The further left you move, the more it never works. Remember Jimmy Carter’s misery index? (That’s what forced me out of my once beloved Democratic Party.) 

Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different outcomes. Let’s do sane for a change.

Hannah Pingree presents as an honorable and capable public servant. That said, she will, if elected, be badly constrained by the romantic-but-dysfunctional emerging narrative of her party, now in thrall to its fanatical base, listing so far to portside that it is about to capsize the ship of state.

Maine is one of the states most guided by common sense. Its voters will embrace the candidate with a proven agenda for affordability and security rather than a member of the party who is admittedly charming but impractically romantic (Bernie, AOC, Zohran, etc).

While the nation scratched its head at Maine’s oddly out of sync “oyster farmer” there was, and is, a more meaningful race afoot. Many who have known Bobby Charles for decades and watched him serve his country unflinchingly think he, considered a dark horse, is the odds-on favorite to pull an upset and bring common sense and real management skills to Maine’s governance.

Advertisement

So, political junkies? Now that Platner vs. Collins has ended, please turn your attention to the true marquee Maine race, Charles vs. Pingree. For as Maine goes, so goes the nation.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

“I’m Ashamed of My Country”: Biddeford, Maine Locals Grieve Neighbor Killed by ICE

Published

on

“I’m Ashamed of My Country”: Biddeford, Maine Locals Grieve Neighbor Killed by ICE


A poster of Joan Sebastián Durán Guerrero, the man killed by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, is displayed at a memorial in Biddeford, Maine.Robert F. Bukaty/AP

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

The day after hundreds of locals poured into the streets of Biddeford, Maine in protest of ICE’s killing of 26-year-old Joan Sebastián Durán Guerrero on Monday, I drove through the former mill town. It seemed eerily still, as if in shock. When the horrors of Minneapolis and Houston come to your small corner of New England, what can you do?

In Mechanics Park in Biddeford, a small but diligent group presented one answer: you keep showing up.

“When I woke up this morning, I knew that this was the place I should go right to,” said Wayne Miller, 71, a retired pilot of 35 years and resident of Beverly, Massachusetts. “This is my backyard. This is my neighborhood.”

Advertisement

He paused, then started to cry. “I’m ashamed of my country. I love the country. I’m ashamed.”

Miller was standing with a sign that read “Dissent while you still can” at the corner of Mechanics Park in Biddeford, where the protest and vigil for Guerrero had been held the day before. A nearby chain-link fence served as a memorial, lined with flowers, signs, and letters of grief and apology for Guerrero and his family. One read, “3-year-olds should be watching Bluey, not their fathers being executed.” Above a “No Trespassing” sign, someone had placed another: “Biddeford was built by immigrants.”

I spoke with Miller and others who had come out on Tuesday to continue expressing their grief for their neighbor, the second person killed by federal agents in less than a week.

“It’s one thing to see a news story from a distance,” said Tessa, 28, a waitress and resident of Biddeford. “But watching it happen close to home, it really recontextualizes the safety that you feel walking around in your neighborhood.”

Advertisement

For Linda Henry, 27, a retired firefighter and Gloucester, Massachusetts resident, it was only a matter of time. “I know that it doesn’t matter where you live. It’s going to happen, you know. ICE is going to come.”

“I’m ashamed of my country. I love the country. I’m ashamed.”

Guerrero was a Colombian citizen who lived in Biddeford, Maine with his partner and 3-year-old daughter. He is one of at least nine people killed by federal immigration agents since the start of Donald Trump’s second term. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin claims Guerrero “weaponized” his vehicle during a traffic stop. But similar claims by DHS have quickly fallen apart after video footage of shootings has come to light.

Reports say that not only was Guerrero authorized to legally work in the US, but he wasn’t the target of ICE’s operations that day. 

Katie, a 48-year-old educator from New Hampshire, shared her anger. “A gun is not a license to kill. These agents have no business drawing their guns,” she said. “They aren’t judge, jury, and executioner, and they don’t have the right to be killing people the way that they are.”

“We were taught from the time we were little, ‘liberty and justice for all.’ We were taught that the United States was a place for everyone, and the current regime has changed that,” Katie continued.

Advertisement
A chain-link fence with a metal
A sign at a makeshift memorial for Guerrero at Mechanics Park in Biddeford, Maine.

Most of the protesters were standing with signs on the sidewalk along the adjacent intersection, shouting “ICE OUT” while passing cars honked. Near the memorial, a man on a bike caught my eye. He was off to the side, alone, quietly reading the letters addressed to Guerrero.

He introduced himself as Diego, 30, a restaurant worker and Biddeford resident. “I knew the guy. He was always around,” he said. “I was working and I was about to cry, to be honest. Because it’s injustice, you know? I’m an immigrant, and this country was built for immigrants.”

“We work, we pay taxes. We also need rights, as everybody does,” he said. “It’s not about left or right. It’s not about a political party. It’s about human rights.”

He told me that while he’s never felt disrespected by his neighbors and the people of Biddeford are good, the government is not the same. He said he feels unsafe and his community of immigrants feels like it’s hiding. 

“How many need to die for us to understand?” Diego said. “He’d got a kid, a little daughter. And that’s the most devastating. Because, you know, if I do something wrong, I can say ‘I’m sorry, I apologize.’ But he’s dead. There’s no apology that can bring him back, you know? He’s dead. I can’t even believe it, I can’t even believe this is happening.” 

A makeshift memorial featuring flowers, letters, and signs for Joan Sebastián Durán Guerrero, a Biddeford Maine resident shot and killed by ICE.
Letters, flowers, and signs lined the fence at Mechanics Park.

When I asked Diego why he had stopped on his bike, he said out of solidarity—for Guerrero, for his partner and daughter. And when I asked what he would say to his community, he said, “Thank you for all the solidarity of people. Thank you for all the understanding. And I hope we can stop the violence.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

How a tragedy changed the timeline — and the politics — of Maine’s Senate race – The Boston Globe

Published

on

How a tragedy changed the timeline — and the politics — of Maine’s Senate race – The Boston Globe


And while this is the role that many Democratic leaders would be expected to play in this situation, this crop of candidates has an added challenge.

Because this also means there are no meaningful distinctions among the candidates to help guide the eventual 601 delegates who will decide who should run in one of the most closely watched Senate contests in the country.

Advertisement

Indeed, the practical political impact of the tragic situation in Biddeford on the Maine Senate contest is this: What was expected to be an intense two-week primary campaign has effectively been reduced to one week. And the week currently being overtaken by the shock and anger is likely the most crucial.

That’s because 5 p.m. Wednesday is the deadline for supporters to sign up to become delegate candidates for the July 25 statewide convention in Bangor.

Those delegate candidates will then be elected at caucuses held in each of the state’s 16 counties over this coming weekend. From that process will come the 601 delegates who will decide which Democrat will challenge five-term Republican incumbent Susan Collins this fall.

In fact, the best organized campaigns will likely know by Sunday who has already won the contest because they can simply add up how many of their own supporters became delegates.

In other words, the contest could be effectively over before most Mainers even begin to really pay attention.

Advertisement

Further, unlike some major news developments that provide a moment of political clarity, this tragic situation in Biddeford resolves nothing. Instead, it raises the stakes for Democrats to make the right choice.

What that means in the context of choosing between a more progressive populist candidate in the mold of Platner or a more traditional Democrat in the mold of this year’s Democratic nominee for governor, Hannah Pingree, remains an open question.

There is simply less time now to discuss it.

Now, none of the above is meant to take away from the discussion about a husband and father who was killed by the government and whatever circumstances led to that tragedy.

To be sure, the moment a Democratic nominee is selected, the role of ICE will immediately become the first real dividing-line issue in the Senate race. After all, Collins oversees ICE’s budget as chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and has been actively involved in conversations with the administration about enforcement in Maine.

Advertisement

But as to who should face her, the clarity and contrasts that campaigns tend to reveal are not currently there among Democrats at a time when they would be most helpful. As it stands, all of the candidates oppose the Trump administration’s overall agenda, oppose the Iran war, promote some version of an affordability message, and, above all, oppose Collins.

Nor is there an obvious choice if Maine Democratic delegates decide electability should be their highest priority.

Campaigns rarely unfold on the timetable candidates expect. Outside events intervene, reshaping what voters hear, what campaigns can talk about, and, ultimately, what party insiders have to evaluate.

In this case, Democrats face the unusual challenge of selecting a Senate nominee while the issue dominating the public conversation is one on which nearly all of the candidates already agree. That may produce unity after a bruising week, but it also leaves delegates with fewer opportunities to distinguish between the people asking for their votes before making one of the biggest political decisions in Maine this year.


James Pindell is a Globe political reporter who reports and analyzes American politics, especially in New England.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending