Connect with us

Minnesota

Preds Conclude 2024 With Loss in Minnesota | Nashville Predators

Published

on

Preds Conclude 2024 With Loss in Minnesota | Nashville Predators


The Nashville Predators closed out 2024 with a 5-3 loss to the Minnesota Wild on New Year’s Eve at Xcel Energy Center. The result sees the Preds go winless in their back-to-back set through Winnipeg and Minnesota with three contests to go on their five-game trip.

Colton Sissons, Jonathan Marchessault and Ryan O’Reilly scored for Nashville, and the Preds had 46 shots on goal, but Minnesota scored three times on the power play to help them to a victory.

“Tough one,” Preds Head Coach Andrew Brunette said. “I thought we played more than well enough, deserved to win. I thought we had the ice tilted most of the game, gave up three power play goals, [but we were] in the box way too much, especially on a night when the kill wasn’t as good as it has been.”

“I think we wasted another good effort with just parading to the penalty box,” Sissons said. “Again, we’re putting the kill under duress, not to say it’s just the volume that’s the issue. We’re making some mistakes out there too, which we’ve got to get back to being dialed in, but it’s just too much – our 5-on-5 game, it’s been pretty solid for a couple weeks – and we’re just killing ourselves. It’s frustrating.”

Advertisement

Marco Rossi gave Minnesota a 1-0 lead less than halfway through the opening period, but the Preds came back to tally two of their own. First, Sissons tipped home a Brady Skjei point shot, and then Steven Stamkos capitalized on a Wild turnover and fed Marchessault in front to beat Filip Gustavsson to give Nashville a 2-1 advantage.

In the middle frame, Minnesota regained the lead on goals from Mats Zuccarello and Jonas Brodin before O’Reilly tied things at three when he roofed a rebound in tight. But before the period was out, the Wild got their second power-play goal of the night – this time from Declan Chisholm – to take a 4-3 lead into the room after 40 minutes.

The Preds gutted things out in the third period on the second half of a back-to-back – and down to 11 forwards and five defensemen with Zach L’Heureux having been ejected with a match penalty for slew-footing and Jeremy Lauzon leaving with a lower-body injury – but Minnesota got one more on the power play before the night was out as 2024 came to a close.

“Certain nights, the goaltending, the penalty killing, taking too many penalties, lose momentum; those things, that’s been the story of the year,” Brunette said. “It’s been, you plug one hole, it’s another hole. Give a lot of credit to the group, they’re still fighting. I thought they showed a lot of resolve today. Never gave in, never gave up, and when we get through this, we’ll be better for it. We just have to believe that and keep putting the work in.”

Notes:

Advertisement

Preds defenseman Adam Wilsby did not play on Tuesday in Minnesota and is day-to-day with an upper-body injury. Additionally, defenseman Jeremy Lauzon left Tuesday’s game with a lower-body injury and did not return.

Predators forward Zach L’Heureux was given a match penalty for slew-footing in the second period, an automatic ejection from the game.

Per NHL Public Relations, Jonathan Marchessault’s goal was the 244th of his career, the second most among undrafted players since he entered the League in 2012-13 behind Artemi Panarin (281).

The Predators will now head back to western Canada to start 2025 with a back-to-back set in Vancouver and Calgary on Friday and Saturday. They’ll then head back to Winnipeg to close out the trip before returning home next weekend.

Advertisement



Source link

Minnesota

University of Minnesota’s 5-year plan includes ‘exciting’ health care efforts for Duluth

Published

on

University of Minnesota’s 5-year plan includes ‘exciting’ health care efforts for Duluth


DULUTH — The University of Minnesota Duluth received a visit from University President Rebecca Cunningham last week, just days before the start of the spring semester.

Cunningham’s Northland visit included meetings with several local legislators, as well as stops at some of the system’s regional facilities.

The trip was capped off with a forum hosted at UMD on Friday. Cunningham and UMD Chancellor Charles T. Nies met with college community members and discussed the university’s new strategic roadmap, outlining upcoming initiatives and opportunities at UMD and across the university system.

“We have these five wonderful campuses that serve different students with different interests in different study and learning environments,” said Cunningham in a sit down with the News Tribune, “and we’re working together in really just new and exciting ways.”

Advertisement

Back in October, the university unveiled its new strategic plan, Elevating Extraordinary 2030, which outlines its goals and mission over the next five years. Building on the last strategic plan, which concluded in 2025, the university’s next phase will be guided by five main areas of focus: preparing and engaging students, innovative learning, serving communities, advancing research and investing in the local workforce.

“The strategic roadmap … really gives us the framework and the structure to say we’re doing this, not only because we know it’s good for our students,” said Nies, who co-chaired the development committee for the new plan, “but it’s also helping to advance the mission and the programming for the University of Minnesota, across all campuses.”

University of Minnesota President Rebecca Cunningham and Duluth Chancellor Charles Nies answer questions from staff and faculty, and speak about the university’s new initiatives.

Contributed / University of Minnesota Duluth.

How each of the five main university campuses puts the elements of the strategic plan into action will likely look a little different at each school, Nies said, but having a set of system-wide goals will also create more opportunities for campus partnerships and shared resources.

Advertisement

One of the overall facets of the strategic plan focuses on serving the community through the development of health care and health research, which has led to “exciting” investments in the university’s medical programs, Cunningham said.

Earlier this year, the UMN’s Medical School Duluth Campus expanded to a four-year program, opening new opportunities for students looking to focus their education in areas such as rural health, family medicine and Native American health.

The UMN School of Dentistry, which trains more than 70% of Minnesota’s practicing dentists, is also planned to undergo changes, Cunningham, said as the university looks to restructure and renovate the school.

However, the university’s top priority right now is reaching an agreement on continued funding and support for the state’s largest medical school.

In November, the University of Minnesota rejected a proposed deal between Fairview Health Services and University of Minnesota Physicians, the clinical practice for the school’s faculty. While the $1 billion deal would have provided funding and support to the medical school for the next 10 years, the university objected to the proposal, claiming a lack of involvement in negotiations and that the university’s control over the medical school would be greatly reduced under the new plan.

Advertisement
20260109_UMN_Cunningham UMDVisit_AM003_00180.jpg
University of Minnesota President Rebecca Cunningham joins Duluth Chancellor Charles Nies at a campus forum with faculty and staff to discuss recent successes and initiatives and to answer questions.

Contributed / University of Minnesota Duluth

All parties have since returned to the negotiating table, with the help of a Minnesota Attorney General-appointed mediator.

“We’re in mediation right now, and I expect that we’ll come to a solution that works for all three parties here,” Cunningham said. “The university remains very committed to rural health care, and once that gets sorted, we can continue to look to other plans and phases. … There’s lots of opportunities for next conversations and next partnerships, but my first job of business is to sort out our partnership with Fairview.”

Among those “next conversations” are discussions about the proposed medical center in downtown Duluth, a project that has been under discussion since 2022.

Advertisement

The idea to expand current health care services and training options in Duluth through a new academic health center has received

continued support

from the city since it was first proposed. While Essentia Health and Aspirus St. Luke’s have

offered locations

for the potential medical school campus, Cunningham says the plan still requires some more thought.

Advertisement

“The university is still interested in exploring that opportunity, and it remains in our five-year plan that we worked with the regents on last June,” Cunningham added. “We plan to continue to explore the opportunities … for what the right opportunity is for medical education here, and how we could expand that.”

Expanding medical education efforts go hand in hand with local initiatives, like

the Duluth Promise,

Nies said. Focused on creating career pathways in fields with high workforce demands, Duluth Promise is a coalition of local schools and industry groups, including UMD, Duluth Public Schools and the Duluth Area Chamber of Commerce.

The initiative launched last year and has since narrowed its focus to health care careers.

Advertisement

“It fits in rather nicely with some of the overall focuses of our strategic plan,” Nies said. “We’re creating a pathway from kindergarten to med school right here in Duluth. … We’ve got a lot of strong partnerships here, and we’re going to really lean into that strength as we move forward. There’s a lot of great things ahead.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

Minnesota sues federal government to try to end deployment of immigration agents

Published

on

Minnesota sues federal government to try to end deployment of immigration agents


Officials in Minnesota are suing the federal government in an attempt to stop the deployment of thousands of immigration agents to Minnesota, the state’s top prosecutor said Monday.

“We allege that the obvious targeting of Minnesota for our diversity, for our democracy and our differences of opinion with the federal government is a violation of the Constitution and of federal law,” Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said at a news conference.

Calling the deployment a federal “invasion of the Twin Cities,” he said: “This has to stop.”

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Minnesota, includes the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul as plaintiffs and names officials with the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection as defendants.

Advertisement

In a statement, Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin accused Ellison of “prioritizing politics over public safety” and said he and other “sanctuary politicians” were the reason the department had to surge immigration agents to the state.

“President Trump’s job is to protect the American people and enforce the law — no matter who your mayor, governor, or state attorney general is,” she said.

“This pathetic stunt only proves that Democrats will put illegal criminals over hardworking Americans every time,” a White House spokeswoman said in a separate statement.

Speaking at Monday’s news conference, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey cited the number of police officers in his city — 600 — and called the deployment of thousands of federal immigration officers “wildly disproportionate.”

“At times, there are as many as 50 agents arresting one person,” he said, adding: “We’re feeling the impact here in Minneapolis. Schools have closed. People are afraid to go to work, shop or seek medical care. 911 calls are up. Police resources are indeed stretched thin.”

Advertisement

St. Paul Mayor Kaohly Her, whose family fled Laos for the United States when she was 3, told reporters that she’s carrying her passport and ID with her at all times.

“I don’t know when I’m going to be detained,” she said.

The complaint was filed one day after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said that hundreds more federal officers are heading to the state amid protests over the killing of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent.

Noem said that the federal operation in the state is now focused not just on targeting alleged violations of immigration law but on tackling ICE-related protests.

Noem has described Good, a prize-winning poet, as a terrorist who “weaponized” her vehicle against the ICE officer who fatally shot her in self-defense. Local and state officials have disputed that claim, saying that Good, 37, was only trying to leave the scene and calling federal officials’ characterization “propaganda.”

Advertisement

Good was in the driver’s seat of an SUV in a residential part of Minneapolis on Jan. 7 when she was killed. Video obtained by NBC News that appears to have been recorded by Jonathan Ross, the officer who shot Good, captured Good and her wife talking to the officer in the moments before he opened fire.

Video from eyewitnesses shows officers telling Good to get out of her car before she begins driving away. Multiple gunshots can be heard and the SUV slams into a parked vehicle.

Officials in Minnesota have criticized federal authorities for barring the state’s Bureau of Criminal Apprehension from participating in the investigation examining Good’s death. Asked about the move last week, Noem accused state investigators of allowing people to harass and incite violence against federal officers.

The Trump administration began ramping up immigration-related arrests in Minnesota in December, after conservative commentators focused on a years-old scandal in which federal prosecutors uncovered a sprawling fraud scheme in the Somali community.

Last week, more than 2,000 officers and agents from ICE and Homeland Security Investigations were deployed to the city after a right wing influencer accused several Somali-run day cares of fraud. The allegations were investigated by state officials who said they found no evidence to back up the claims.

Advertisement

Illinois also sued the Trump administration Monday, alleging in a federal lawsuit that immigration agents deployed in the city are using “unlawful and dangerous tactics.”

“We have watched in horror as unchecked federal agents have aggressively assaulted and terrorized our communities and neighborhoods in Illinois, undermining Constitutional rights and threatening public safety,” Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said in a statement.

In a statement, a White House spokeswoman said the suit “reads like a far left manifesto” that seeks to “smear law enforcement officers and incite violence against them. Democrat politicians must stop siding with criminal illegal aliens over American law enforcement.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Minnesota

Why state charges for Minneapolis ICE shooting are possible but tricky

Published

on

Why state charges for Minneapolis ICE shooting are possible but tricky



To get a case to trial, state prosecutors may have to show federal immunity doesn’t apply.

play

Many in Minnesota and across the country were outraged by the killing of Renee Nicole Good by a federal immigration agent in a Minneapolis neighborhood, and called for the agent to face charges. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, who oversees the city’s police department, said the Trump administration’s characterization of the shooting as self-defense is “spin.”

But even if Minnesota prosecutors conclude the shooting was a crime, can they charge a federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent for something he did on the job? No, according to Vice President JD Vance, who asserted that the agent has “absolute immunity” from criminal charges.

The reality isn’t so simple. Minnesota state prosecutors may, in fact, be able to prosecute the federal immigration agent who shot and killed a Minneapolis woman, though the pathway forward would come with special challenges.

State officials announced Jan. 9 that they are collecting evidence surrounding Good’s Jan. 7 death, a signal they may consider bringing charges. The move comes after President Donald Trump and other White House officials suggested the shooting was justified, and state authorities said the FBI pulled out of a joint investigation.

Advertisement

Though the U.S. Department of Justice hasn’t announced whether it will bring charges, the hasty statements by White House officials opposing charges make a federal prosecution seem highly unlikely, especially at a time when the lines between the DOJ and White House are increasingly blurred.

“When you have the president, the vice president, the secretary of homeland security all saying that this was self-defense, there’s zero chance that Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice will move forward with a prosecution at the federal level,” Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor, told USA TODAY.

At a Jan. 9 news conference, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and the top prosecutor for Minneapolis’ Hennepin County, Mary Moriarty, both said they haven’t yet made a charging decision when it comes to Good’s death, and will wait until evidence is evaluated.

Ellison led the state prosecution of Derek Chauvin, a Minneapolis cop convicted in 2021 of murdering a Black man who was under arrest, George Floyd. Moriarty was elected in 2022 on a platform of holding police accountable.

Advertisement

Rahmani said he wouldn’t be surprised by a decision to bring charges.

“I think they ultimately will choose to prosecute,” Rahmani said. “Attorney General Ellison’s office has been pretty aggressive in these types of cases, dating back to George Floyd,” he added.

As tensions have flared over the Minneapolis death, federal agents shot and wounded two people during a traffic stop in Portland, Oregon, on Jan. 8. As with the Minnesota case, federal officials said the driver “weaponized his vehicle,” while local officials called for an investigation. Similar questions of potential state charges could arise in that case.

Here’s why Minnesota authorities could pursue state charges, but could also face challenges:

Advertisement

Hurdles to Minnesota prosecuting federal agent

One challenge to Minnesota officials bringing charges is that they would likely have to prosecute the case outside of their home turf. There’s a federal law allowing officers of federal agencies to move their cases to a federal court when they are being prosecuted for something they did as part of their official responsibilities.

That’s a significant disadvantage for state prosecutors, according to Mark Bederow, a criminal defense lawyer in New York City and former Manhattan prosecutor. He noted that, in a federal court, state prosecutors would be dealing with a different pool of potential jurors, a different judge, and different legal processes.

“It’s a road game, instead of having home court advantage,” Bederow said.

In addition, state prosecutors would likely have to meet special legal standards to get the case to trial, because they would be prosecuting a federal agent. In that type of case, defendants often argue they can’t be prosecuted because of a constitutional provision – the Supremacy Clause – that puts federal law above state law.

Advertisement

Federal courts have sometimes blocked state prosecutions under that provision, out of concern that state authorities are using their prosecutorial power to frustrate the federal government from legitimately exercising its own powers, according to Bryna Godar, a staff attorney at the University of Wisconsin Law School’s State Democracy Research Initiative.

Godar wrote in the Lawfare legal publication that federal courts have repeatedly blocked state prosecutions when the federal official was reasonably carrying out lawful federal duties. But, outside those circumstances, courts have allowed the prosecutions to go forward.

“In many cases, the federal officer may ultimately walk away with immunity. But not always,” Godar wrote.

Another potential challenge is courts disagreeing on the exact contours of this type of immunity for federal officers, leaving the law in this area somewhat unsettled, according to Godar. The U.S. Supreme Court hasn’t weighed in on this type of immunity in more than a century.

Murder and manslaughter charges could be in play

Even if state officials do decide charges are warranted, they are unlikely to bring a first-degree murder charge, according to Rahmani. That crime generally requires premeditation.

Advertisement

He said state officials might consider a form of manslaughter or a lesser murder charge, which come with maximum penalties ranging from 10 to 40 years in prison. For example, a person can be guilty of second-degree manslaughter in Minnesota by unreasonably endangering a person’s life or of second-degree murder by intentionally killing someone without premeditation.

“It’s possible that there’s multiple charges and they don’t just land on one, to give jurors really the option,” Rahmani said.

‘Very tough job for prosecutors’

If the ICE agent ended up facing charges, he would likely argue he shot Good in self-defense, former prosecutors told USA TODAY.

Minnesota law allows officers to use deadly force if it’s reasonable for them to believe the force will protect them or another person from great bodily harm.

In this case, the agent may argue that Good appeared to be directing her SUV at him. Trump officials have highlighted video footage from the front of the SUV, saying it shows movement in the agent’s direction. Advocates for Good have pointed to footage from the rear, which shows the vehicle turning as if to pass the agent and get away.

Advertisement

Looking across multiple public videos, which show both Good’s handling of the wheel and the movement of the SUV’s tires, Good is driving simultaneously rightward and forward, as the agent stands towards the left, front side of her car. Then there are three brief sounds that may be bullet shots, one as the agent points his gun at the left side of the front windshield, and then two more as he is pointing at the side window as the car drives away.

Protests have mounted across the country, with many arguing the video shows the shots weren’t reasonable, and protesting what they see as ICE’s aggressive behavior — including towards U.S. citizens such as Good — more generally.

“They are already trying to spin this as an action of self-defense,” Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said at his Jan. 7 press conference. “Having seen the video myself, I want to tell everybody directly – that is bull—-.”

But Bederow said, as emotional as the case is, there is much more to be parsed out in terms of witness interviews and video analysis that could illuminate key legal questions, such as whether it was reasonable for the ICE agent to believe he was in danger.

Advertisement

“Lawyers who do this for a living and have experience in self-defense or justification cases realize that there’s a lot more nuance to this than saying, ‘She didn’t mow the guy down, and he shot and killed her,’” Bederow said.

If he does face charges, the agent might argue that he was operating in a heated environment — he and Good’s wife were filming each other outside the SUV as she asked if he “wanted to come at” them, just seconds before the shooting — and that he didn’t have the luxury of analyzing the direction of the SUV’s movements in a frame-by-frame, slow motion video.

“It’s going to be a very, very tough job for prosecutors, notwithstanding the fact that there is very disturbing video and a woman lost her life,” he said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending