President-elect Donald Trump garnered a historic level of support from the Asian American and Pacific Islander community in Nevada during the 2024 election, primarily because he zeroed in on two problems that transcended racial constructs.
Despite the fact that he was running against Vice President Kamala Harris, a Democratic candidate with a South Asian background, exit polls show Trump nearly doubled his share of votes from AAPI voters relative to his 2020 performance, subsequently flipping the Silver State red for the first time in two decades.
Nevada has the highest percentage of AAPI voters among the seven battleground states, and the population has grown to almost 3.2 million, up from 2.7 million in 2010. The demographic shift toward Trump was the outcome of successful targeting by his campaign, voters hearing the right things, and general apathy toward the cultural issues Democrats were highlighting to excite voters.
The economy and border
Unsurprisingly, Trump’s focus on the economy and immigration was a key factor in shifting Nevada’s AAPI demographic toward the GOP. In an exit poll conducted after the interview, 64% of AAPI respondents said they voted for Trump, compared to the 61% in 2020 who said they voted for Biden
Advertisement
Post-election exit polls showed that his message on the twin issues pulled the race in his favor, as data showed concerns about the economy and immigration resonated with Nevadan voters across racial divides. Of the Nevada residents who voted for Trump, overwhelming majorities cited economy as their top concern, followed by immigration.
Many American Filipinos, who form the largest Asian ethnic group in Nevada, felt resentment that people could “stay here illegally” when they “went through the mill” to become permanent residents, said Jose Manuel Romualdez, the Philippines ambassador to the U.S., during post-election musings on ABS-CBN News.
James Zarsadiaz, an Associate Professor of History and Director of the Yuchengco Philippine Studies Program at the University of San Francisco, agreed.
“Some Asian immigrants and refugees in particular feel they settled in the U.S. the ‘correct’ way. Conservative messaging helps convince them that undocumented individuals sully the dignity of the legal pathways to citizenship that they took,” he wrote in an op-ed following the election.
Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump greets former Democratic Hawaiian Rep. Tulsi Gabbard after she introduced him to speak during a campaign rally at Thomas & Mack Center, Thursday, Oct. 24, 2024, in Las Vegas, Nevada. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
While immigration concerns loomed large, many professionals, including Zarsadiaz and Ana Wood, the director of the Las Vegas Asian Chamber of Commerce, said the economy was the single most important issue Nevada voters considered as they cast their votes.
Advertisement
“All those [rising costs] affect the Asian businesses,” Wood told the Nevada Independent in late October. “They’re finding that they have financial challenges. And I’m not talking just about restaurants — I’m talking about even the spas, nail salons, dry cleaners.”
Karthick Ramakrishnan, a political scientist and founder of the polling organization AAPI Data, told NBC News following the election that Asian Americans viewed Trump more favorably in 2024 because of economic concerns.
“If you’re unemployed or employed, if you’re retired or working, everyone feels the pain of inflation,” Ramakrishnan said. “That was a significant headwind for the Democratic Party, including Harris.”
It was the Harris campaign’s failure to adequately address concerns about the voters’ two top issues that helped drive the vice president’s historic decline in support from the AAPI community, according to Shakeel Syed, the executive director of the nonprofit South Asian Network.
“Look at Trump’s agenda: He ran on inflation and immigration primarily,” Syed told NBC. “And I think she did not address those things.”
Advertisement
The culture war factor
While the twin pillars of economy and immigration propelled Trump to the White House, it was the Democratic Party’s stance on controversial “culture war” issues that helped drive voters away from Harris, according to experts.
Renu Mukherjee, a fellow at the Manhattan Institute, reported following the election that Asian Americans pivoted to Trump because of an “indifference” to progressive issues, including “soft on crime” measures, diversity, equity, and inclusion policies in the classroom, and abortion.
Romualdez, the Filipino ambassador, agreed that the Harris campaign made a strategic mistake in “hammering” AAPI voters on abortion instead of kitchen table issues.
“I think the messaging was, was lost in the translation, in the sense that what’s important, really, for most people here was the economy and the illegal [immigrants.] You know, Trump was able to connect that the illegal immigration is what is causing the economy to be burdened … he was able to connect that … and that he was going to get rid of it, he was going to change and going to and bring down inflation prices,” the ambassador said.
Overall, Mukherjee wrote that “Asian Americans’ dissatisfaction with Democratic positions on the economy, crime, and education reflect their broader dissatisfaction with progressive assaults on merit, fairness, and the American dream — ideas that many Asian American groups hold dear.”
Advertisement
Multiple national surveys in recent years have indicated Asian Americans increasingly view relaxed crime policies backed by progressives with disfavor. The majority of Asian Americans in California, which borders Nevada, supported the passage of a ballot measure this year that sought to roll back some of the Golden State’s more lenient penalties for certain offenses.
The Democratic Party’s view on racial equity in the education system and movement away from merit-based standards has also turned AAPI voters away, according to Asra Nomani, a former journalism professor at Georgetown University.
“The injustice of being labeled as ‘privileged,’ ‘selfish,’ ‘cheaters,’ ‘overrepresented,’ ‘white adjacent,’ and ‘resource hoarders’ hurt very deeply,” Nomani said during an interview with RealClearPolitics. It led to “political mobilization and a reconsideration of long-standing political loyalties.”
Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump gestures during a campaign rally at Lee’s Family Forum, Thursday, Oct. 31, 2024, in Henderson, Nevada. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
Some members of the AAPI community rejected Harris because her campaign’s liberal stance on gender identity conflicted with their religious beliefs. Others, particularly Filipino voters with backgrounds in communist countries, gravitated toward Republicans due to their “conservative” tendencies, according to Pauline Lee, the president of the Nevada Republican Club and a Chinese American.
With Filipino Americans currently being the largest and fastest-growing segment of the AAPI population in the U.S., Lee told the Nevada Independent that the “older Filipinos who came to this country are all conservative,” in comments that were backed up by Filipino Ambassador Romualdez.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Advertisement
Trump made his pitch directly
Trumpworld made reaching the voting bloc a large focus of efforts in Nevada, with Turning Point USA holding an AAPI-themed rally in Las Vegas just weeks before Election Day. Trump himself appeared at the event alongside Hawaiian native Tulsi Gabbard, a top campaign surrogate, hailing her as “an incredible leader from the Asian American Pacific Community,” as he delivered remarks that focused largely on the economy and the border.
TPUSA president Charlie Kirk concluded the pitch to Asian Americans, saying, “Just as we’re seeing huge shifts with Hispanics and the black community, this is a group that is poised to resonate powerfully with President Trump’s message of economic empowerment, law-and-order, safe streets, and a return to orderly, sane immigration policies.
Mojave (Nev.) head football coach Wes Pacheco announced on Sunday morning that he’s stepping down from his position, according to a social media post.
Pacheco announced his resignation after six seasons at the helm of the Rattlers, putting together a 29-22 overall record from 2020-2025.
“I have officially stepped down as Head Coach of the Mojave Football Program,” Pacheco said in his social media post. “Thank you to Principal Cole for giving me the opoortunity make an impact on the lives of Mojave Student-Athletes. I am grateful and blessed to have labored through a 6-year journey of successes, failures, life lessons, character building and growth with the student-athletes myself and my coaching staff have served. I will forever love my Mojave Family, the Mojave Community and believe in the notion that SUCCESS can be attained by showcasing character, treating everyone with respect, and always have the courage to dream big and trust that “ATTACKING THE HARD WORK” & “HIGH MOTORING EVERYTHING” can yield SUCCESS that you want to achieve in life!”
During Pacheco’s half dozen seasons leading Mojave, his best record came in the 2024 season when the Rattlers finished with a 12-1 record. Located out of North Las Vegas, Mojave had to compete against the likes of national high school football powerhouse Bishop Gorman during the regular season.
Advertisement
Mojave ended the last season with a 4-6 record and as the state’s No. 23rd ranked team, according to the final 2025 Nevada High School Football Massey Rankings.
More about Mojave High School
Mojave High School, located in North Las Vegas, NV, is a dynamic public high school that fosters academic excellence, personal growth, and community involvement. Home of the Rattlers, MHS offers a wide range of academic programs, athletics, and extracurricular activities. With a strong commitment to student success, Mojave emphasizes leadership, college and career readiness, and a supportive school culture that prepares students for life beyond graduation.
For Nevada high school football fans looking to keep up with scores around the nation, staying updated on the action is now easier than ever with the Rivals High School Scoreboard. This comprehensive resource provides real-time updates and final scores from across the Silver State, ensuring you never miss a moment of the Friday night frenzy. From nail-biting finishes to dominant performances, the Rivals High School Scoreboard is your one-stop destination for tracking all the high school football excitement across Nevada.
A recent Review-Journal letter to the editor mischaracterized Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto’s Southern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act, also known as the Clark County Lands bill. As the former executive director of the Nevada Conservation League, I wholeheartedly support this legislation, so I wanted to set the record straight.
Sen. Cortez Masto has been working on this bill for years in partnership with state and local governments, conservation groups like the NCL and local area tribes. It’s true that the Clark County lands bill would open 25,000 acres to help Las Vegas grow responsibly, while setting aside 2 million acres for conservation. It would also help create more affordable housing throughout the valley while ensuring our treasured public spaces can be preserved for generations to come.
What is not correct is that the money from these land sales would go to the federal government’s coffers. In fact, the opposite is true.
The 1998 Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act is a landmark bill that identified specific public land for future sale and created a special account ensuring all land sale revenues would come back to Nevada. In accordance with that law 5 percent of revenue from land transfers goes to the state of Nevada for general education purposes, 10 percent goes to the Southern Nevada Water Authority for needed water infrastructure and 85 percent supports conservation and environmental mitigation projects in Southern Nevada. This legislation has provided billions to Clark County and will continue to benefit generations of Southern Nevadans. Sen. Cortez Masto’s lands bill builds upon the act’s success.
Advertisement
So here’s the good news: All of the money generated from land made available for sale under Sen. Cortez Masto’s bill would be sent to the special account created by the 1998 law. Rather than going to an unaccountable federal government, the proceeds would continue to help kids in Vegas get a better education, bolster outdoor recreation and modernize Southern Nevada’s infrastructure.
I know how important it is that money generated from the sale of public land in Nevada stay in the hands of Nevadans, and so does the senator. That’s why she opposed a Republican effort last year to sell off 200,000 acres of land in Clark County and other areas of the country that would have sent those dollars directly to Washington.
Public land management in Nevada should benefit Nevadans. We should protect sacred cultural sites and beloved recreation spaces, responsibly transfer land for affordable housing when needed and ensure our state has the resources it needs to grow sustainably. I will continue working with Sen. Cortez Masto to advocate for legislation, such as the Clark County lands bill, that puts the needs of Nevadans first.