Connect with us

Alaska

How a single education vote is shaping legislative races across Alaska

Published

on

How a single education vote is shaping legislative races across Alaska


In Anchorage, 148 teacher positions were vacant at the start of the school year. In Aniak, the superintendent says school buildings are falling down. The Kenai Peninsula Borough School District is projecting a $17 million deficit next year. In Fairbanks, an enrichment program for gifted students is on the chopping block.

Education funding is a key issue in several legislative races across the state that could shape control of the Alaska Legislature next year.

In March, lawmakers failed — by a single vote — to override Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of a bill that would have substantially increased Alaska’s public education funding formula for the first time in years.

Advertisement

Since then, several candidates have said they were motivated to challenge sitting legislators because their representatives flip-flopped on the issue — voting first in favor of the bill to increase education funding, and then against overturning Dunleavy’s veto of the policy they had supported.

Incumbents who sided with Dunleavy say overriding the veto would have been futile because the governor could have again vetoed the funding from the budget. They argue that the path to a permanent increase in education funding must include agreeing to the governor’s demands — which include the expansion of charter school availability.

Challengers say that a permanent increase to the state’s education budget is urgently needed, and should not depend on the adoption of other reforms favored by the governor.

Many expect that education funding will again be a key issue in the coming legislative session. Lawmakers left Juneau earlier this year after approving a one-time funding boost for schools that educators and administrators said was insufficient.

Meanwhile, the impacts of the legislative stalemate are profound.

Advertisement

Kuspuk School District Superintendent Madeline Aguillard said that this school year, two-thirds of district teachers — who serve 320 students in nine schools — are international hires on visas. The district has no music or foreign language classes.

“No in-person, elective-type courses are taught by certified teachers,” she said. “They’re all an online-based model, because we can’t plan long-term to hire people.”

‘Pretty much trashed’

In an open Interior race to replace GOP Sen. Click Bishop, Rep. Mike Cronk, a fellow Republican, is running against Fairbanks North Star Borough Assembly member Savannah Fletcher, an independent. Both say education has been brought up repeatedly in their campaigns.

Cronk said he’s been “pretty much trashed for not overriding the governor’s veto.”

Cronk, a retired schoolteacher, said he thinks the Base Student Allocation formula is broken, because it is written in such a way that ensures schools remain open even if they are not operating at full capacity.

Advertisement

“Everybody thinks just writing a big check solves the issue. It really doesn’t,” said Cronk.

The state’s funding formula should be revised with the goal of improving student performance, he said, and state funding could increase “as long as we know that our kids, our students, are the benefactors.”

Fletcher said education funding is “a major reason” she is running for the state Senate.

“If you believed in legislation enough to vote for it the first time, why would you not stick to your convictions?” Fletcher said. “I am disappointed, and I promise to be a legislator that will stick to my convictions.”

The view is shared by Walter Featherly, an Anchorage independent challenging Republican incumbent Rep. Julie Coulombe for an Anchorage Hillside seat. Like Cronk, Coulombe voted in favor of the underlying bill and then against overriding Dunleavy’s veto.

Advertisement

Featherly, a former president of the Anchorage School Board, said that Coulombe’s vote against overriding a bill she initially supported indicated that she was willing to “cave to political pressure.”

Coulombe was not available for an interview. In a written statement, she criticized Featherly and Dunleavy’s opponents for failing to consider the education reforms the governor sought to enact.

“I am for funding and reform, but you must have both sides willing to come to the middle, and I just didn’t experience people on the funding side willing to consider any of the governor’s reforms. I do not support pouring more money into a failing system but would like to see the schools change and adapt to improve results,” she said.

On Friday, the Anchorage School District projected that the $5,960 Base Student Allocation would need to be increased by $1,526 to match losses from inflation since 2017 — the last time the BSA was substantially boosted. A school funding increase of that size would cost the state over $385 million per year.

‘Coding their language’

The 907 Initiative, a group that supports progressive causes, has launched an advertising effort targeting sitting legislators for their votes on the education funding veto.

Advertisement

One ad attacks several lawmakers for voting no on overriding Dunleavy’s veto, calling the underlying bill “a historic opportunity to increase education funding and get our students the support they need to thrive.” The legislators on the receiving end of the attacks include Cronk and Coulombe, along with Kotzebue independent Rep. Thomas Baker and Anchorage Republican Rep. Craig Johnson.

“When I knock on doors, there are two main issues that I bring up. The first one is school funding,” said Featherly, who trailed Coulombe by three points in the August primary.

Johnson faces a challenge from Chuck Kopp, a more moderate GOP former lawmaker with a history of working across the aisle. Kopp led Johnson by a 21-point margin in the August primary.

Baker was appointed to his seat by Dunleavy late last year, and voted in line with the governor’s positions on key issues. He was a registered Republican when selected for the seat, but switched his party affiliation to independent ahead of the election. He faces two Democratic opponents, each of whom received more votes than he did in the primary — Mayor Saima Chase of Kotzebue and Robyn Burke of Utqiagvik, president of the North Slope Borough’s school board.

“The first thing I want to see is an increase to the Base Student Allocation,” Burke said in an interview.

Advertisement

Chase, who had Dunleavy as her fourth grade teacher in Kotzebue, said that she supports a long-term increase to the state’s school funding formula, alongside more funding for vocational education.

“It’s tough on our kids, because we constantly get first-year teachers here, and we’re not getting enough support to get them long term,” she said. “Gone are the days of teachers that have been here for 20 years.”

Baker did not respond to a request for comment. In a July interview with Kotzebue’s public radio station, Baker reasoned that the veto override vote would have been futile because the governor would have vetoed the funding from the budget.

Some lawmakers quietly said that voting to override the governor’s veto could lead to reprisals by Dunleavy against their other legislative priorities. Other legislators told the Daily News that it was simply difficult for a Republican lawmaker to defy a sitting Republican governor. Fifty-six of 60 legislators voted for the underlying education bill. Seventeen of those Republicans voted against the measure after Dunleavy vetoed it.

Aubrey Wieber, who directs the 907 Initiative, said it was important that Alaskans know about legislators’ record on the veto override — an action they may not choose to highlight.

Advertisement

“Everyone talks about supporting education, and even if they’re not supporting any funding increase for public education, they’re still pretty much coding their language so you can’t understand what their actual position is,” said Wieber.

Other independent groups backing candidates are also putting education front and center.

Putting Alaskans First, an independent expenditure group that funds progressive and centrist legislative candidates, received $70,000 this year from the political action committee of NEA-Alaska — a union representing most teachers in the state — and in turn contributed significant sums in key races.

Americans for Prosperity, a conservative group that urged Dunleavy to veto the bipartisan education bill and thanked legislators for sustaining that veto, has been spending money to support Republican candidates aligned with its positions. The advocacy group broadly supports expanding charter schools and sending more public funds to private schools.

Dunleavy has remained largely opaque on his education priorities after failing to gain legislators’ support for his policy goals earlier this year.

Advertisement

His office declined an interview request for this story. In response to emailed questions, Dunleavy spokeswoman Jessica Bowers said that the governor’s position is that “schools need funding to address inflation. However, the BSA is not a silver bullet, and funding should be targeted to where it will have the greatest positive impact on student learning.”

Fierce competition

Rep. Bryce Edgmon, a Dillingham independent running for reelection, said the makeup of the Legislature next year — and the House in particular — will play a role in determining the outcome of the education funding debate.

Currently, the House is governed by a 23-member majority that includes 19 Republicans, along with two Democrats and two independents — Edgmon among them.

The 16-member House minority, made up mostly of Democrats and independents, is seeking to grow its ranks enough to control the chamber. Increasing education spending is one of the coalition’s top priorities.

Members of the current House majority vary in their positions on education but have been skeptical of a plain funding increase.

Advertisement

House Speaker Cathy Tilton, a Wasilla Republican running unopposed, said she would support policy proposals favored by Dunleavy to increase the number of charter schools in Alaska. But when asked about whether House Republicans would support an increase to the Base Student Allocation, she declined to answer, saying that it would “certainly be a topic of discussion.”

“Although a lot of our members are being hit on not being pro-education, I would say that is totally opposite,” said Tilton.

Control is often won narrowly in the closely divided chamber, but it could take just two flipped seats to see a sea change.

The seats held by Baker, Johnson and Coulombe could all be part of determining control of the House as more moderate candidates run on a platform of boosting education funding.

The campaigns have so far refrained from talking about specific numbers. Last year, educators said they would need a boost of more than $350 million to the existing education budget of around $1.2 billion in order to make up for seven years without significant increases to the formula. The funding ultimately written into the bill vetoed by the governor included a $175 million increase to the estimated annual budget.

Advertisement

Edgmon said that the legislative debate next year could be all the more challenging because oil prices are currently hovering close to $70 per barrel, below past projections by the state.

“The competition for what could be a lesser amount of state dollars could be more fierce this upcoming session,” said Edgmon.

Correction: The story has been updated to reflect that the 907 Initiative focuses on progressive causes, but does not involve itself in political campaigns. A separate organization, 907 Action, supports progressive candidates in statewide and local elections. 907 Action and 907 Initiative are both directed by Aubrey Wieber.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Alaska is reporting 18 in-custody deaths so far this year, tying a grim record

Published

on

Alaska is reporting 18 in-custody deaths so far this year, tying a grim record


Barbed wire fencing surrounds Goose Creek Correctional Center on Tuesday, Aug. 29, 2023 outside of Wasilla. (Loren Holmes / ADN)

The Department of Corrections this week reported the 18th death of an inmate this year, tying the record for the highest number of annual in-custody deaths in at least the past decade.

Kane William Huff, who had been imprisoned at Goose Creek Correctional Center near Wasilla, died Dec. 11, according to a DOC statement. Huff, 46, was serving a sentence for a 2018 conviction on two counts of sexual abuse of a minor, according to online court records. DOC officials said he had been in custody since 2015.

Huff was found unresponsive in the prison’s infirmary, where he had been housed, said Department of Public Safety spokesman Austin McDaniel. Alaska State Troopers, who handle in-custody death investigations, have closed their investigation and are awaiting autopsy results from the State Medical Examiner Office, McDaniel said. Troopers don’t believe Huff died by suicide or that foul play was involved, he said.

The last time as many people died in state custody was in 2022, when a record seven inmates also died by suicide, according to a department snapshot of deaths since 2015.

Advertisement

The Department of Corrections began consistently keeping inmate death statistics in 2001, said spokesperson Betsy Holley. The department also posts data showing in-custody deaths since 2015. That year, 15 people died while in DOC custody.

The state’s official count for 2025 doesn’t include the death of 36-year-old William Farmer, who died in a hospital in January after he was severely beaten by his cellmate at the Anchorage Correctional Complex the month before.

An upward trend of in-custody deaths in the past several years has alarmed some prisoner rights advocates and prompted state lawmakers to ask Department of Corrections officials to address the deaths in multiple hearings this year. The department has also found itself under fire for inmate suicides.

This year, at least four inmates have died of natural or expected causes, such as disease or a medical event, while at least five have died by suicide, according to information provided by Alaska State Troopers.

Officials have also said that a Spring Creek Correctional Center prisoner died of an overdose in April.

Advertisement

Another inmate, 53-year-old Jeffrey Foreman, died in July after being restrained by guards after an altercation with his cellmate at the Anchorage Correctional Complex.

[Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly described the year the Department of Corrections started consistently keeping inmate death statistics. It was 2001, not 2015.]





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Hawaiian, Alaska airlines to use locally made biofuel | Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Published

on

Hawaiian, Alaska airlines to use locally made biofuel | Honolulu Star-Advertiser




Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

LNG pipeline legislation debate divides Alaska lawmakers after consultant calls it ‘essential’

Published

on

LNG pipeline legislation debate divides Alaska lawmakers after consultant calls it ‘essential’


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) Alaska lawmakers are divided over whether new legislation is needed for a liquified natural gas pipeline, with the state’s energy consultant calling it “essential” while some legislators say existing laws are sufficient.

“A successful project will likely require suitable enabling legislation from the state legislature, among other key prerequisites,” state-contracted energy consulting firm GaffneyCline, hired by the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee for up to $200,000 in April 2024, says in a document made public for the first time Monday.

The 62-page document, presented to the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee last month, concludes that legislation is essential for the pipeline to be viable but more needs to be done to get the project across the finish line.

“A detailed economic model of the project is required before the legislature can take an informed view as to the appropriate degree of government take that the project can sustain, and how this could evolve over time,” the document states.

Advertisement

Alaska’s News Source reached out to Glenfarne Tuesday for comment on who presents the economic model and when that model could be presented. Spokesperson Tim Fitzpatrick referred on the report for GaffneyCline.

“We will continue to work closely with the legislature to discuss policy issues that may affect Alaska LNG and work collaboratively on solutions that enable Glenfarne to provide Alaskans with affordable energy security as rapidly as possible,” he said in a statement.

The document’s release comes amid optimism from pipeline developers and federal officials but growing skepticism from some state lawmakers.

During a November Legislative Budget and Audit Committee which discussed the same topic, House Speaker Bryce Edgmon, NA-Dillingham, left believing “the upcoming 2026 legislative session could be dominated by policy measures related to advancing the Alaska gas line project.”

“We don’t have any of this,” Edgmon said last month, relating to laws GaffneyCline says are essential.

Advertisement

Rep. Mia Costello, R-Anchorage, former House minority leader and co-chair of the Alaska Gasline Caucus, said she believes legislation for the pipeline is not needed, citing previous legislative involvement.

“Large scale LNG projects around the world are successfully developed through commercial agreements, private capital, and existing regulatory processes not legislative intervention,” Costello said in a statement. “Alaska already has established permitting, taxation, and regulatory framework capable of supporting energy development. Legislative involvement risks introducing political uncertainty, delaying timelines, and discouraging investors who prioritize stability and market driven decision-making.”

However, Sen. Elvi Gray-Jackson, D-Anchorage, told Alaska’s News Source the policy measures currently in place are more than a decade old, created for a different project, and don’t easily mesh with the task in front of them today.

“When project leadership … and financial models change, it’s our responsibility to revisit the policy framework that governs the state involvement, and that’s what we’re going to do as a legislature,” Gray-Jackson said.

Legislative action?

The asks pipeline developers want in those policies could be steep.

Advertisement

On the list of asks is a concept called “fiscal stability,” essentially a promise if Alaska changes its tax or regulatory policies later, the state would make up any financial losses to investors, according to a GaffneyCline presentation shown to lawmakers on the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee.

Those guarantees can mean a “tax freeze” — locking in the current tax system for the life of the project — potentially 20-30 years, according to GaffneyCline’s presentation to lawmakers. If Alaska later raises taxes or imposes new regulations, the presentation said the state would have to compensate investors to maintain their original profit expectations.

Another ask is the lowering of property taxes for the pipeline, something GaffneyCline’s November presentation said could cost the project $1 billion and add 9% to the cost of delivered gas.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy plans to introduce a bill to lower property taxes for the pipeline, spokesperson Jeff Turner confirmed Tuesday. No other LNG bills are planned at this time, he added.

Time crunch

Whatever the legislature decides to do, they’ll need to do it quickly. The regular session convenes Jan. 20, and for the following 120 days, the process to create a package of policies and framework addressing LNG issues will likely be front of mind.

Advertisement

That comes after Glenfarne Alaska LNG set expectations in October that construction for the pipeline will begin in late 2026 and be operational by mid-2029.

“What Alaskans should take away from the report is that we need to hope for the best, but prepare for the situation not moving as fast as Glenfarne and the other players are thinking,” Gray-Jackson said.

Lawmakers have signaled a mixture of optimism for what the pipeline could create, but it comes with skepticism, too. Gray-Jackson said she was “cautiously optimistic.”

“Frankly, I don’t know where we’re at as far as the legislature is concerned because we haven’t gotten any real answers from Glenfarne,” Gray-Jackson said.

A Glenfarne spokesperson said last month they are active in providing information to the state legislature.

Advertisement

“Glenfarne is making rapid progress on Alaska LNG and regularly meets with legislators to provide updates and discuss important state and local policy considerations,” Glenfarne communications director Tim Fitzpatrick said. “We appreciate the legislature’s continued engagement to help make Alaska LNG a success for the state.”

“I understand the potential, huge, multi-generational impact of the state, as well as being very positive,” Sen. Bert Stedman, R-Sitka, told Alaska’s News Source following the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee meeting in November.

“Concentrating on the benefit of the project that we know, if it’s successful, it’s going to be very beneficial, and if it’s unsuccessful, it could be detrimental for generations.”

“Will the project even come unless we present the right scenario?” House Majority Leader Chuck Kopp, R-Anchorage, asked Nick Fulford, GaffneyCline senior director and global head of gas and LNG.

“You mentioned the buyers want 20–30 years of stability … our fiscal framework might be a little bit out of alignment, if I’m hearing you correctly,” Kopp said.

Advertisement

“If those things are all true, our needs, our situation, us being out of alignment, we’re going to have to look at possibly a reality that this line doesn’t even get [built],” the representative added.

Federal permits completed

The project completed 20 federal permits and environmental reviews last week, according to the Permitting Council, clearing what the governor called “the last major regulatory hurdle.”

“Alaska LNG received the major federal permits needed to proceed in 2020,” Fitzpatrick said. “Some of these permits have a five-year renewal cycle, which was completed last week and all of Alaska LNG’s major permits are current and in effect. Glenfarne has an ongoing process to maintain permits and authorizations for Alaska LNG.”

With the permits cleared, the pipeline inches toward a final investment decision (FID). Natural Gas Intelligence, a natural gas news provider, described an FID as “the last step of determining whether to move forward with the sanctioning and construction of an infrastructure project.”

A source familiar with the pipeline developments previously told Alaska’s News Source to expect an FID early next year.

Advertisement

“Alaska LNG will strengthen our economy, create long-term jobs, and provide reliable energy to Alaskans and our global partners for generations to come,” Dunleavy said.

“I am thrilled to see the Alaska LNG project finish federal permitting actions ahead of schedule,” said Permitting Council Executive Director Emily Domenech in the press release.

“This combined effort reflects our commitment to the State of Alaska and to achieving President Trump’s energy dominance agenda.”

Domenech visited the state alongside the congressional Natural Resources Committee in August, when Dunleavy signed a deal with the Trump administration aimed at bringing more resource development investment will come to Alaska.

LNG, however, was not heavily discussed at the meeting.

Advertisement
Governor Mike Dunleavy (right) shows a signed memorandum of understanding promising “improve(d) coordination and transparency in permitting major infrastructure projects across the state,” his office said.(Rachel McPherron)

“Completing federal permitting for Alaska LNG ahead of schedule shows how the Trump administration is restoring America’s Energy Dominance by cutting unnecessary delays and unleashing our abundant resources,” Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in the release. “This project strengthens U.S. energy security, creates jobs for Alaskans, and reinforces our commitment to a permitting system that works at the speed of American innovation.”

National momentum

The federal push comes as as GaffneyCline’s presentation said both LNG supply and demand are expected to boom globally. Liquefaction, or the process of turning gas into liquid, is expected to increase by 42% by 2030, reaching about 594 million tons per year.

This summer, Dunleavy vetoed several bills and cut more than $100 million from the state budget, largely due to reduced state revenues from oil price declines.

“The oil situation has deteriorated,” Dunleavy said in a video statement before his budget was revealed. “The price of oil has gone down; therefore, our revenue is going down.

“Basically, we don’t have enough money to pay for all of our obligations. So, as a result of that, you’re going to see some reductions in this year’s budget.”

Advertisement

The pipeline project has support from both the state and federal levels. President Donald Trump has pledged to ensure an LNG project gets built “to provide affordable energy to Alaska and allies all over the world.”

On Jan. 20, Trump signed the “Unleashing Alaska’s Extraordinary Resource Potential” executive order, which the administration says prioritizes “the development of Alaska’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) potential, including the sale and transportation of Alaskan LNG to other regions of the United States and allied nations within the Pacific region.”

Despite the optimistic timeline, Alaska has seen multiple LNG pipeline proposals fail over the past two decades due to financing challenges, regulatory delays and market conditions.

Environmental groups and some Alaska Native groups have also raised concerns about the pipeline’s potential impact on wildlife and traditional lands.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending