Connect with us

Southwest

Cleared 'Trump Train' defendants liken their case to 'lawfare' campaign against former president

Published

on

Cleared 'Trump Train' defendants liken their case to 'lawfare' campaign against former president

Defendants in the so-called “Trump Train” case in Texas say they have been fully vindicated after they were cleared of voter intimidation allegations in relation to a highway interaction nearly four years ago when a convoy of Trump supporters in pickup trucks and SUVs surrounded a Biden-Harris campaign bus on a busy highway.

Three of the defendants – Steve and Randi Ceh, along with Joeylynn Mesaros – spoke to Fox News Digital, detailing the hellish years they endured fighting back against what they say was an attempt to stifle their political speech and attack their First Amendment rights.

They say the case was a “lawfare” campaign against them and likened it to recent court cases brought against former President Trump. The trio, along with two others, had their charges dismissed by a federal jury.

‘TRUMP TRAIN’ TRIAL KICKS OFF WITH FORMER DEMOCRATIC LAWMAKER TESTIFYING SHE FELT LIKE A ‘HOSTAGE’

Trump train trial defendants celebrate outside court. (Jay Janner/American-Statesman/USA Today Network via Imagn Images)

Advertisement

Eliazar Cisneros, whose pickup collided with a white SUV in a caught-on-camera incident, was ordered to pay the bus driver $10,000 and an additional $30,000 in punitive damages. The collision, and the alleged aggressive behavior from the convoy, occurred on Oct. 30, 2020, when the bus passed through San Marcos, about 30 miles southwest of Austin.

The trio tell Fox News Digital that the incident was largely uneventful and that the bus and the SUV were swerving in and out of traffic. They say the collision was minor and that it was blown up by the media and taken out of context to paint Trump supporters as extremists.

It was very friendly. I actually have tons of video of friendly encounters where we’re waving on the side of the road, smiling, the bus is just driving, and the trucks are driving behind it,” Mesaros recalled. “Through the lawsuit, we did identify there were maybe one or two vehicles that were driving in a way that we wouldn’t have driven. I think at worst, it’s maybe a traffic citation, not anything major or extreme, certainly not a conspiracy under the Ku Klux Klan law to intimidate voters. But those people weren’t sued, it was just intentionally us [and] I think that we were targeted as what they perceived maybe to be easy targets, but they couldn’t have imagined that God would sustain us in this fight and we would prevail.”

The plaintiffs accused the Trump supporters of assault and political intimidation tactics, violating state law and the federal Enforcement Act of 1871 – also known as the Ku Klux Klan Act – which aims to stop political violence and intimidation tactics. The law was enacted by Congress during the Reconstruction era to protect the rights of Black men to vote by prohibiting political violence. No criminal charges were filed against the six Trump supporters.

The driver of the Biden-Harris campaign bus told jurors during the trial that he felt “under attack” and feared for his life when the bus was swarmed by the convoy. He said the actions of the group forced him to slow the bus to a 15 mph crawl on the busy highway.

Advertisement

The driver, along with former Texas state Sen. Wendy Davis, a campaign volunteer and a staffer, sued the six defendants, with Davis testifying that she felt like she was being “taken hostage in a way.”

The plaintiffs say the group drove recklessly and attempted to run the bus off the road and forced them to cancel the campaign event they were headed to. Davis also described the verdict as vindicating and a relief.

‘TRUMP TRAIN’ TRIAL: DEFENDANT SAYS CONVOY USING ‘FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT’ DURING HIGHWAY CLASH

In terms of the on-road collision, Cisneros’ attorney says he will appeal. In the incident, Cisneros’ pickup and a Biden campaign SUV collided while trailing the bus, although nobody was hurt. 

Cisneros denied driving recklessly and argued that a campaign staff member in the white SUV initiated the collision along the highway. Video leading up to the collision shows the SUV repeatedly driving in between lanes. Cisneros testified that a social media post by him afterward bragging about “slamming” the other vehicle had been taken out of context.

Advertisement

A pickup with Trump flags alongside a Biden-Harris campaign bus. (John Hinojosa via Storyful)

The Cehs say they were dragged into the lawsuit because they ran a Facebook page that helped organize Trump parades in the New Braunfels area, which Mesaros would also take part in. 

They say they were aware the bus was going to be around that day, but they were on their way back from work when they came across it. 

“I was in a company truck, so I did see it go by, and we weren’t pulled into this lawsuit until a year and a half after it was filed,” Steve said. “And that is because we organized a Trump train here in New Braunfels that got pretty big, it was all grassroots. And also, I am a pastor, so the mainstream regime that we see wants to shut down all the truth. Anybody that opposes them, they want to shut it down, or they want to instill fear in all of us, so we do not speak up against them. And we just can’t do that.”

Speaking to reporters after the Trump Train trial are, from left, bus driver Tim Holloway, David Gins, a former campaign staffer for Joe Biden, and former state Sen. Wendy Davis, in downtown Austin on Sept. 23, 2024. (Jay Janner/American-Statesman/USA Today Network via Imagn Images)

Advertisement

He added, “I don’t want my grandkids to grow up in a Marxist society and right now it’s leaning that way.”

Randi says the prosecution painted her as being “mission control” for organizing the event when she notified the Facebook group ahead of time. The group had as many as 5,000 followers, she says.

“I was asked… to make a post that the Biden bus was coming through and if anybody wanted to peacefully follow it, they could. And so I put the post out, went to work and found out later that I was going to be sued for being mission control,” Randi Ceh said.

Joeylynn Mesaros says the case was more than political persecution and that the prosecution tried to circumvent the Constitution to make its case. She says her family owed about $75,000 in legal fees, which they now intend to sue to recoup. The Cehs’ legal fees were covered by the nonprofit Citizens Defending Freedom. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS AP

Advertisement

A Trump supporter in a pickup tails a Biden-Harris campaign bus in 2020. (John Hinojosa via Storyful)

“We’re getting the same treatment that President Trump does. We’ve got the gag order, we have the unfair jurisdiction, the biased Obama-appointed judge. We’ve got the motions in limine that prevent us from speaking the whole truth. They’re not allowing us to reference the Constitution, they’re watering down the definition of free speech,” Mesaros said. “So by the time the jury gets its instructions, it’s such a rigged sham trial. It’s a complete joke and a mockery of the judicial system to leverage for their own political gain.”

Mesaros says the case was even referenced in Trump’s impeachment trial and his 14th Amendment hearing to label his followers as political extremists or having extremist tendencies.

“So not only are they interfering with the Constitution, interfering with the election, they’re creating lies, hiring experts to substantiate it and then cross cross-hatching them in all of their lawsuits to substantiate their own claims while we’re collateral damage.”

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Southwest

Crockett’s likely House successor is radical reparations activist: ‘Gotta pay us what you owe us’

Published

on

Crockett’s likely House successor is radical reparations activist: ‘Gotta pay us what you owe us’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Jasmine Crockett’s pastor, Frederick Haynes III, who announced his bid to take over Crockett’s House seat shortly after she announced her now-failed bid for the U.S. Senate, won the Democratic primary for Texas’s 30th Congressional District and will likely win in November due to the district being reliably blue.

Haynes, who Crockett calls her pastor and mentor, runs Friendship-West Baptist Church in Dallas, where he has been at the helm for around 40 years, according to public reporting. 

In a sermon the day after Hamas invaded Israel and slaughtered thousands of Israelis on Oct. 7, 2023, Haynes blasted Israeli “apartheid” and praised notorious antisemite Louis Farrakhan, who infamously compared Jews to termites in one of his sermons. In addition to Haynes’ anti-Israel remarks, he has also positioned himself as a radical reparations activist who once told congregants that “America was born in political violence.”

“America, you owe us. What you done to us has been immoral. It’s been evil. It’s been unjust. It’s been downright wrong and the only way to bring salvation to America – you gotta pay us what you owe us,” Haynes told congregants in 2022 at the San Francisco church of failed presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ longtime mentor and pastor, Amos Brown, who has made several controversial comments, including blaming the United States for the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Advertisement

Frederick Haynes III is running to replace outgoing Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas. He is a megachurch pastor in Dallas who Crockett has cited as “my pastor.” (Haynes for Congress)

“If you want salvation to come to this house, you’ve got to engage in reparations,” he continued.

In Tuesday’s primary, Haynes came out with a commanding victory, garnering 72.6% of the vote, according to the Associated Press. Former Texas state representative and Dallas City Council member, Barbara Caraway, came in second with 23.1% of the vote, and another Dallas-area pastor, Rodney LaBruce, came in third with just 4.3% of the vote. 

Texas’s 30th Congressional District has been controlled by Democrats for many years and covers the southern portions of the Dallas-Forth Worth metro area. 

Haynes campaigned on issues that align with Crockett’s time in congress as a member of the progressive group of lawmakers dubbed, “The Squad,” including Medicare for All, abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and raising the minimum wage. Crockett’s time with the “Squad” is now ending following her loss in the Texas Democratic Party primary for the U.S. Senate on Tuesday against moderate James Talarico.

Advertisement

During his watch-party on election night Tuesday, Haynes also parroted claims that Crockett and other Democrats made about alleged voter suppression spurred by Republicans in Tuesday’s Texas primaries. 

JASMINE CROCKETT SUGGESTS GOP RIGGED HER DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY ELECTION: ‘THIS IS WHAT REPUBLICANS LIKE TO DO’

Dallas megachurch pastor Rev. Frederick Douglass Haynes III is running to replace Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas. (iStock; John Medina / Getty)

In addition to his sermons and discussions at churches promoting reparations, Haynes also participated in a reparations rally outside the White House in 2023, during which he said the United States was “born in the sin of a hostile, genocidal takeover of Indigenous land and shaped by anti-Black White supremacy.” 

“This is a country that spent in the aftermath of emancipation decades plundering Black communities and ensuring that we were economically exploited and excluded,” Haynes said at the rally. “And so how could you talk about redemption without reparation?”

Advertisement

“We’ve come to cash our check because we’ve seen the [profit and loss] statement,” he continued.

Haynes also has a history of pushing anti-Israel sentiment. In 2017, Haynes posted a photo of himself on social media with notorious antisemite Louis Farrakhan, calling him a “wonderful and great man.” Farrkhan once called Jews termites in a now infamous sermon. Meanwhile, just one day after Hamas terrorists went into Israel and killed thousands of Israelis, Haynes suggested Israel’s “apartheid” was to blame. 

Frederick Haynes III is running to replace outgoing Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas. He is a megachurch pastor in Dallas who Crockett has cited as “my pastor.” (Haynes for Congress)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Last year, after the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Haynes accused Kirk of espousing “dangerous” views “rooted in white supremacy,” and criticized characterizations of Kirk’s murder as an assassination. “A White Christian gets killed, murdered, not assassinated,” Haynes said, before launching into a comparison about how Black people who have been assassinated allegedly get treated worse. “Martin King got assassinated, Malcom X got assassinated, Medgar Evers got assassinated, don’t compare Kirk to King.”

Advertisement

Though he condemned political violence, Haynes proceeded to drill into Kirk, saying, “What Kirk said was dangerous, what Kirk said was racist, rooted in white supremacy, nasty and hate-filled.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to Haynes for comment on his radical positions, but he, nor any of his representatives, have responded.

Fox News Digital’s Peter Pinedo contributed to this report.

Related Article

Illinois reparations commission releases lengthy report of state's 'harms' against Black citizens

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Southwest

Austin bar shooting bodycam released as DA makes major call about cops who shot suspected terrorist

Published

on

Austin bar shooting bodycam released as DA makes major call about cops who shot suspected terrorist

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Bodycam video from the Austin mass shooting, which is being investigated as a terrorist attack, was released on Thursday as the county’s liberal district attorney announced he would take no action against the three officers who killed the suspect.

In 911 audio released by the Austin Police Department along with the bodycam video, one individual told the operator that he “heard like six gunshots.”

“We’re hiding between cars,” the caller said. “There has been a shooting at Buford’s on 6th St. There are people dead over here. There have been multiple people shot. We need help right now.”

In one surveillance video released by police, the shooter, identified as 53-year-old Ndiaga Diagne, can be seen walking around a parking lot with an AR-15 before opening fire on someone nearby.

Advertisement

53-year-old Ndiaga Diagne killed three people and injured over a dozen more people, Austin police said. (Austin Police Department)

Officers can be seen in bodycam video directing bystanders to get down before opening fire on Diagne, who was killed.

Travis County District Attorney José Garza announced Wednesday that no action would be taken against the three police officers who killed Diagne. Diagne shot and killed three people and left more than a dozen other people injured on Sunday outside a bar in Austin, Texas.

“Today, the Travis County District Attorney’s Office notified the Austin Police Department that it has formally concluded its review of the mass shooting on 6th Street and will take no action against the three officers who stopped the shooting,” the news release stated.

Under a 2021 policy by Garza’s office, all officer-involved shooting cases were to be presented to a grand jury.

Advertisement

Bodaycam footage shows the night of a shooting in Austin, Texas. (KTBC)

District Attorney Jose Garza speaks at a news conference on Feb. 19, 2026. (Jay Janner/The Austin American-Statesman via Getty Images)

LISTEN TO THE NEW ‘CRIME & JUSTICE WITH DONNA ROTUNNO’ PODCAST

Austin Police Association President Michael Bullock told Fox News Digital he wishes Garza would have made the decision to not convene a grand jury much earlier, and said police officers are under constant fear of being targeted by the liberal district attorney.

“The reality is APD officers are more afraid of the DA targeting them than a gunman shooting at them,” Bullock told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

Shooter approaches a bar with a rifle in Austin, Texas. (KTBC)

Police officers guard the scene after a shooting on March 1, 2026, in Austin, Texas. (Ricardo B. Brazziell/Austin American-Statesman via AP)

Bullock said it’s the first time Garza hasn’t presented an officer-involved shooting to a grand jury since implementing the policy.

Doug O’Connell, a criminal defense attorney representing the Austin police officers, told Fox News the 2021 policy was instituted at the direction of the Wren Collective, which is a criminal-justice reform group providing financial support to progressive prosecutors.

“When our current district attorney came into office about six years ago, he instituted this policy at the direction of the Wren Collective, and it’s been in place since that time. Every officer-involved shooting has been presented to the grand jury,” O’Connell said. “It’s not required by law. It is simply a policy decision that he’s instituted at the direction of Wren Collective.”

Advertisement

Bullock said the Wren Collective has recently pushed “to increase the number of indictments against officers which can only be done through grand jury.”

TEXAS DA SAYS NO CHARGES FOR POLICE IN TERROR ATTACK RESPONSE, AMID CRITICISM OF MANDATORY GRAND JURY REVIEW

The Austin Police Department released a photo of Ndiaga Diagne as the suspect tied to Sunday’s mass shooting. (Austin Police Department)

National Police Association spokesperson Sgt. Betsy Brantner Smith told Fox News Digital that investigations into officer-involved shootings should be internal. 

“A grand jury is basically a secret process and is controlled by the prosecutor. These officers cannot have a defense attorney or a union representative in the grand jury,” Smith said. “He is well known as one of the most anti-police district attorneys in the nation.”

Advertisement

Garza previously called the officers that killed Diagne “heroes.” The shooting happened at Austin’s Buford’s Backyard Beer garden shortly before 2 a.m. on Sunday.

FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X

Federal agents comb the scene of a potential terrorist attack in Austin, Texas. (Aaron E. Martinez/Getty Images)

FBI Acting Special Agent in Charge Alex Doran said during a press conference on Sunday that while investigators are still looking for a possible motive, there were “indicators that on the subject and in his vehicle that indicate potential nexus to terrorism.”

Law enforcement sources told Fox News that the shooter was wearing a sweatshirt that read “Property of Allah as well as an undershirt with an Iranian flag. The sources said a Quran was also found in Diagne’s car. According to CBS News, Diagne had pictures of Iranian leaders at his home as well as an Iranian flag.

Advertisement

SEND US A TIP HERE

Savitha Shan, 21, Ryder Harrington, 19 and Jorge Pederson, 30, were killed in the shooting, authorities said during a Monday press conference.

Diagne initially entered the United States in 2000 on a B-2 tourist visa, according to the Department of Homeland Security, becoming a lawful permanent resident in 2006 after marrying a U.S. citizen.

On April 5, 2013, Diagne became a naturalized U.S. citizen.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

The Austin Police Department and the FBI investigate a shooting at Buford’s on West 6th Street in Austin on March 1, 2026. (Stephanie Tacy/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis said Diagne “put his flashers on, rolled down his window and began using a pistol shooting out of his car windows, striking patrons of the bar that were on the patio and that were in front of the bar.”

Davis said the suspect exited his vehicle and shot at individuals, but didn’t enter the bar.

Related Article

Austin mass shooting: Timeline traces suspect’s rap sheet as terror link probed



Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading

Southwest

GOP Rep Tony Gonzales admits to affair with former aide for first time

Published

on

GOP Rep Tony Gonzales admits to affair with former aide for first time

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

This story discusses suicide. If you or someone you know is having thoughts of suicide, please contact the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline at 988 or 800-273-TALK (8255).

Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-Texas, admitted to having an affair with a former staffer for the first time on Wednesday.

Gonzales made the confession during an appearance on a conservative talk radio show, just one day after he advanced to a runoff election in his congressional district’s GOP primary. The House Ethics Committee also launched an investigation into Gonzales on Wednesday.

“I made a mistake, and I had a lapse in judgment, and there was a lack of faith, and I take full responsibility for those actions,” he said on “The Joe Pags Show” Wednesday night. “Since then, I’ve reconciled with my wife, Angel. I’ve asked God to forgive me, which he has, and my faith is as strong as ever.”

Advertisement

“When you make mistakes like this, it’s never easy. It humbles you,” he added.

Regina Santos-Aviles, a staffer for Republican Rep. Tony Gonzales of Texas, died Saturday, Sept. 13, 2025, in Uvalde, Texas. (Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post via Getty Images | Regina Santos-Aviles Facebook)

The Ethics Committee is investigating whether Gonzales, a married father of six, engaged in sexual misconduct with a female member of his staff and whether he doled out special favors or privileges as a result.

Gonzales has said he has no plan to step down in the face of the accusations, saying last month that there are more details to be released regarding the situation.

“What you’ve seen is not all the facts,” Gonzales told reporters in late February.

Advertisement

REP TONY GONZALES HIT WITH HOUSE ETHICS PROBE OVER SEXUAL MISCONDUCT ALLEGATIONS

Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-Texas, has denied having anything to do with his former staffer’s death. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

The three-term congressman argued at the time that he was being “blackmailed” in connection with the case. Controversy first arose after the San Antonio Express-News reported they obtained text messages in which the former staffer, Regina Ann Santos-Aviles, wrote to a colleague that she had an affair with the lawmaker.

Santos-Aviles later died after setting herself on fire.

Gonzales denied having anything to do with her death during his radio appearance.

Advertisement

NANCY MACE TO FORCE VOTE TARGETING FELLOW GOP LAWMAKER ACCUSED OF AFFAIR WITH STAFFER

Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-Texas, is interviewed by CQ-Roll Call. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

“I hadn’t spoken with Miss Santos since June of 2024. She passed September of 2025… I had absolutely nothing to do with her tragic passing. And in fact, I was shocked just as much as everyone else,” Gonzales said. 

Gonzales took to social media last month and accused Santos-Aviles’ husband of “blackmail,” sharing a partial screenshot of an email from the widower and claiming he was seeking money.

“I WILL NOT BE BLACKMAILED,” Gonzales wrote in a Feb. 19 post on X. “Disgusting to see people profit politically and financially off a tragic death.”

Advertisement

In the email posted by Gonzales, attorney Robert Barrera discussed a possible lawsuit against the lawmaker and a potential settlement with a nondisclosure agreement. The email says that the maximum recoverable amount is $300,000.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Barrera denied he was trying to blackmail Gonzales.

“It is a desperate attempt to make him look again like a political victim,” Barrera told The Associated Press last month. “There’s no blackmail here. I mean, it’s just ridiculous allegations.”

Advertisement

Related Article

Republican congressman accused of affair with late aide to face runoff election

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading

Trending