The cold weather has lead to some serious sticker shock when some families in Delaware have opened their power bills recently.

Many customers who use Delmarva Power said that they are upset at the number on their bill and that the company is now looking into another rate hike.

“I track my bills year to year and month to month and just from last year this time it went up 135 dollars,” North Wilmington resident Danny Marsilii said.

Many residents on social media are pointing to the delivery charge that is so much higher than the actual cost of the electricity and gas.

A spokesperson for Delmarva Power said that the company has programs to help low and moderate income families with their power costs but he says they need to raise rates to keep up with aging infrastructure and expand service as needed.

“We recognize lots of people are frustrated with their power bills right now,” a Delmarva spokesperson said. “We are very prudent with our costs and make sure those projects are really needed at the time we do them.”

Meanwhile, Delaware’s public advocate, Jameson Tweedie, says that Delmarva’s reliability record is solid but he says he disagrees with the hike request as it also builds in a significant profit boost for the company.

“In this rate case, Delmarva is seeking a 10.5% return on equity. In my view that is way too high,” Tweedie said. “These are businesses that have a monopoly. They have captive customers. You can’t choose a different utility with tiny exceptions.”

In our region, we get our power from companies that want to make a profit and they answer to shareholders.

Plus, in Delaware the vast majority of the power is imported.

The state doesn’t make a significant amount of power which could then help handle demand.

Also, wind and solar has been very politicized so basically we are all left with very few choices when it comes to getting power.

For Arden resident Jeanette Honis, she said she is not sure how she can keep up with her small home’s bills because she is on a fixed income.

“I usually pay anywhere between $180 to $187. This bill was $300 and something,” she explained.

• Delaware is one of the few states without a formal law mandating the preservation of evidence like blood, semen or hair.
• Senate Bill 214 would require evidence to be kept as long as a crime is unsolved or a person remains in custody.
• Two other related bills would modernize post-conviction DNA testing laws and allow challenges to convictions based on discredited forensic science.

Television crime dramas have trained audiences to believe DNA evidence is always collected, stored and available to be tested years later. In Delaware, that assumption is often wrong. A new legislative package would overhaul how the state preserves biological evidence, a change advocates say could determine whether wrongly convicted people ever get a real chance to prove it.

According to data from the University of Michigan Law School, Delaware has recorded just five known exonerations. That figure stands in sharp contrast to nearly 4,000 exonerations nationwide since 1989. Lawmakers and advocates say the disparity is evidence of a criminal justice system that makes it difficult to prove innocence after a conviction becomes final.

Efforts to address that concern center on Senate Bill 214, introduced by Sen. Kyra Hoffner. The bill would, for the first time, require the state to preserve biological evidence connected to criminal cases. The proposal is supported by Innocence Project Delaware, which has received nearly 200 requests for post-conviction assistance since opening in 2020 from people who say they were wrongly convicted.

Dan Signs, a staff attorney with Innocence Project Delaware, said Delaware is one of a small handful of states without a formal statute that sets clear standards for how long biological evidence must be preserved. As a result, there is no uniform system for maintaining blood, semen, hair or other material that could later be tested using DNA technology unavailable at the time of trial.

By failing to keep pace with national standards, Delaware leaves people with credible innocence claims unable to access evidence that could vindicate them.

SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE: Lawmakers press Meyer for answers on Plummer in closed door meeting

What’s in Senate Bill 214?

If passed, SB 214 would mandate the preservation of all biological evidence in the state’s custody that is connected to a criminal investigation or prosecution. Evidence would have to be retained for as long as a crime remains unsolved or for as long as a convicted person remains in custody, regardless of whether the conviction resulted from a trial or a guilty plea.

The bill also spells out the when biological evidence may be destroyed. Under limited and clearly defined circumstances, destruction would be allowed only if all five of the following conditions are met:

• More than five years have passed since the conviction became final and all appeals are exhausted.
• The evidence is not tied to a Class A through Class E felony.
• No other state or federal law requires the evidence to be preserved.
• The state sends certified written notice of its intent to destroy the evidence to specified parties, including anyone still incarcerated because of that conviction.
• No person who has received such notice files a motion for DNA testing or a written request to retain the evidence within 180 days.

[versión en español]

[vèsyon kreyòl ayisyen]

Rehoboth Bay Aquaculture Oysters Not Affected; Crabs, Conch and Finfish Harvest Remains Open

The Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control has issued an emergency closure of Indian River Bay to the harvest of bivalve shellfish, including clams and mussels, after DNREC received notice of an ongoing sewage release connected to the town of Millsboro’s sewer system that is affecting the Indian River and may impact the bay.

Under National Shellfish Sanitation Program requirements, waters must be closed to bivalve shellfish harvest for 21 days following the end of the release to protect public health and allow time for natural cleansing. Because the release is currently ongoing, the 21-day closure period will begin once DNREC confirms the discharge has ended. DNREC will provide an update and reopening date when available.

This closure does not affect Rehoboth Bay. Oysters grown under commercial aquaculture leases in Rehoboth Bay are not affected by the Indian River Bay closure and remain suitable for raw consumption by healthy individuals. (Recreational oyster harvesting is not permitted in Delaware to protect oyster populations.)

The harvest of crabs, conch and finfish is not affected by this closure.

As an added precaution, DNREC advises water users to limit water contact in Indian River Bay and nearby waters for the next few days, particularly in areas potentially affected by the discharge.

Delaware Natural Resources Police will patrol the area and help inform the public about the closure. DNREC will also notify any affected commercial aquaculture leaseholders.

More information about closures and the DNREC Shellfish Program is available at de.gov/shellfish.

About DNREC
The Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control protects and manages the state’s natural resources, protects public health, provides outdoor recreational opportunities and educates Delawareans about the environment. The DNREC Division of Watershed Stewardship develops and implements innovative watershed assessment, monitoring and implementation activities.  For more information, visit the website and connect with @DelawareDNREC on YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, X, Bluesky or LinkedIn.

Media contacts: Michael Globetti, michael.globetti@delaware.gov; Nikki Lavoie, nikki.lavoie@delaware.gov

###

Print