Connect with us

Crypto

What’s behind the Trump family’s new crypto venture?

Published

on

What’s behind the Trump family’s new crypto venture?

“You can literally sell s*** in a can, wrapped in piss, covered in human skin, for a billion dollars if the story’s right, because people will buy it.”

So said internet marketer and self-professed “dirtbag” Chase Herro from the driver’s seat of his Rolls-Royce in a 2018 YouTube video, according to Bloomberg News.

Six years later, Herro is one of the brains behind a new cryptocurrency venture backed by none other by Donald Trump and his three sons. The elder sons Don Jr and Eric are leading the promotion, although supposedly it is 18-year-old Barron who will serve as the project’s “visionary”.”

In a live broadcast on the social network X on Monday night, Don Jr billed the project – known as World Liberty Financial (WLF) – as “the start of a financial revolution”, while Eric said it would challenge the power of big traditional banks by making crypto as smoothly hospitable to ordinary Americans as one of the Trumps’ famous hotels.

Advertisement

“If there’s one contribution I want to make to the world of crypto, it’s actually making it user-friendly,” said Eric.

“We better damn well embrace [crypto] as a country, because it’s coming,” Eric continued. “And the people who are ignoring it – the people who don’t want to figure it out, who don’t want to make the effort – they’re going to be left behind.

“But at the same time, it’s truly our job to make it understandable… we have to make it intuitive. We have to make it user-friendly. And we will.”

How WLF actually plans to do that, and indeed what exactly WLF is, remained mysterious even at the end of the two-hour livestream.

MSNBC host curses live on air while taunting Trump’s ‘dirtbag’ Crypto partner

But based on what little we know so far, crypto experts interviewed by The Independent were skeptical that the Trumps would protect its users from the scammers and criminals who swarm through the cryptocurrency ecosystem (related: Donald Trump, his older sons and the Trump Organization have been ordered to pay $454m for a civil suit in New York related to financial fraud).

Advertisement

But can the Trumps and their business partners achieve what many in the industry have struggled for years to do and achieve Eric’s goal of making crypto understandable and accessible?

“You’ve got tens of thousands of people that have raised billions and billions of dollars, that are all trying to solve that problem: how do I make my crypto transactions as easy as my transactions on my credit card?” says Zach Hamilton, a longtime crypto venture capitalist and founder of the crypto-powered document storage firm Cache Legal.

“It’s an incredibly hard problem to solve… I don’t really want to speculate on if it could be successful or not, because it doesn’t exist yet. Maybe they’ve got some secret sauce; I doubt it.”

Don Jr at the RNC this year
Don Jr at the RNC this year (Associated Press)

‘We went from elite to just totally cancelled’

As Don Jr told it, his eyes were opened to the world of cryptocurrency and “decentralized finance” – or DeFi for short – when conventional banks withdrew services from the Trump family due to their political activities.

“We went from being the elite in that world to just being totally canceled, and it changed our perspective so much,” he said on Monday. “When you really look at the way our founding fathers set everything up, I think DeFi is what they would envision – not a broken, bureaucratized system where a bunch of middlemen are getting pieces for doing nothing.”

Advertisement

These and other statements from people involved with WLF, and leaked draft documents obtained by the crypto news site CoinDesk, suggest that WLF wants to build a decentralized crypto borrowing and lending system.

In traditional finance, transactions are executed and verified by a small number of powerful institutions such as banks or credit card companies. When you send ordinary money (called fiat money) across national borders, no currency actually moves; rather, the sending and receiving institutions simply agree to adjust their records of what you own and where.

Cryptocurrencies, like bitcoin and ethereum, are different. They are essentially software networks running simultaneously on many computers around the world, which execute transactions collectively by working together to verify each other’s identity and check each other’s math.

In principle, that means no government agent or bank employee can ever block or reverse a crypto transaction. The big exception is cryptocurrency exchanges (such as Coinbase and Binance) that let you convert fiat money into crypto or vice versa, which are consequently required to follow banking law in most major economies.

But WLF probably isn’t building an exchange, according to Zach Hamilton. Those are too expensive and too difficult to set up. Instead he suspects they will modify (or “fork”) an existing crypto lending protocol such as Aave, which uses self-enforcing “smart contracts” to execute and collect loans without any human oversight.

Advertisement

This is not a new idea. “There are a number of prominent DeFi borrowing and lending platforms that have operated for years in crypto, that were built by very well respected teams, where the resilience of the smart contracts and technology has been proven by their durability and popularity,” says Gareth Rhodes, a lawyer and former New York market regulator who now advises finance tech start-ups. “It’s an open question [what] WLF will add in terms of user experience or technology capabilities.”

In that regard, the WLF team’s track record is hardly promising. Although all four Trumps were given job titles in the draft white paper obtained by CoinDesk, it stressed that they will not own or manage WLF but may receive financial benefit from it.

The real managers appear to be Herro and another businessman named Zachary Folkman, who are both listed, are best known for a previous DeFi lending system called Dough Finance. After attracting a few million dollars in transactions, it was hacked and had $2m stolen in July and is now reportedly inactive.

According to a profile by Bloomberg News, Herro made his money through a string of internet marketing and coaching schemes, some of which appeared to flout Facebook’s advertising rules, while Folkman is a former pick-up artist who ran a seminar series called Date Hotter Girls.

Neither Rhodes nor Hamilton said they had heard of Herro or Folkman. And none of the dozen-plus digital asset investors asked by Bloomberg had heard of them either. WLF and the Trump Organization did not respond to requests for comment.

Advertisement

Still, Hamilton says WLF does have one good asset. Forking a lending protocol like Aave is the easy part; that can be done “in an afternoon”, from anywhere around the world The harder thing is to bring enough people into the service, and enough money, to provide the level of liquidity that will actually allow it to function as a market.

“The one thing the Trump Organization has is the biggest megaphone in the world. Anything those people do will be covered ad nauseam by the media,” says Hamilton. “You have to get people’s eyes on what you’re doing, and you have to convince them to move money.”

Even this, however, is only one half of the challenge facing WLF.

Donald Trump is now looking to get into the crypto business
Donald Trump is now looking to get into the crypto business (Getty Images)

‘This is for votes, nothing else’

Less than 24 hours after Monday’s livestream, the crypto lawyer and security expert Alexander Urbelis posted a list of no less than 41 fake web domains aping WLF’s address, likely from scammers looking to cash in on the hype.

Indeed, earlier this month the X accounts of Donald Trump’s daughter Tiffany Trump,30, and his daughter-in-law, Eric’s wife Lara Trump,  were hijacked by apparent cybercriminals promoting a hoax WLF Telegram group, offering up to $15,000 worth of (doubtless illusory) cryptocurrency to anyone who connected a crypto wallet to their service.

Advertisement

These shenanigans underline how rife the crypto ecosystem still is with scams, fraud, and theft. Losses reported to the FBI swelled from just under $4bn to nearly $6bn between 2022 and 2023.

“My industry is not being honest, with the government or the general public, about the scale of cybercrime,” says Rich Sanders, an independent crypto crime investigator who says he has spent the past two years busting Russian-affiliated crypto networks in Ukraine.

Criminals love crypto precisely because it skips traditional middlemen. Transactions are irrevocable, usually unblockable, and safe trading often requires significant technical savvy. Outside of “custodial” services such as Coinbase, which hold crypto on your behalf much like a traditional bank, nobody is going to save you if you make a mistake or fall for a scam. And while nearly all crypto transactions are publicly traceable, it’s sometimes tough to find out the real identity of a given recipient.

So if WLF wants to bring new, non-techie users into this risky world, how does it plan to protect them? “[With] security, you can never be perfect. You know, I think of security as more of a journey,” said WLF adviser Corey Caplan on Monday. “So it’s really important for not just myself but this whole team to remain nimble, adapt, continue to soak up new information like a sponge,”

Both Rich Sanders and Zach Hamilton said that there is a zero-sum trade-off between making crypto newbie-safe and idiot-proof while simultaneously refusing to serve as a middleman or keep custody of users’ currency.

Advertisement

“There’s nothing that WLF is doing that negates the reality that the consumer is going to be the one that holds the private keys. Because they can’t have consumer protection while being a non custodial service; both cannot be true,” said Sanders.

Yet both Sanders and Hamilton also said the impact would be limited because WLF is unlikely to actually attract many (or any) novices. Anyone choosing to use a decentralized lending protocol that cannot swap fiat money for crypto is already diving in at the deep end.

Instead, Sanders claims that the whole project is really just a ploy for Donald Trump to curry favor from the crypto community. “WLF itself is barely worth discussing; it is inevitable vaporware,” he says. “It doesn’t have a vision, doesn’t have a plan, doesn’t fulfil a need, doesn’t need to exist… this is for votes, nothing else.”

Indeed, when Trump visited a bitcoin bar in New York City and spoke to crypto enthusiasts about US monetary policy, crammed together with reporters under a low yet ornately tiled ceiling, it had the vibe of any other campaign stop.

That’s not to say it couldn’t backfire. Nic Carter, a well-known pro-Trump crypto entrepreneur, has appealed to the community to find some way of stopping WLF’s launch, arguing that any successful hack or government investigation could damage the former president’s election campaign.

Advertisement

Hamilton is more sanguine. He hopes that someone as controversial as Trump will at least draw the attention of regulators and force them to set clarifying precedents, illuminating what he describes as a still-murky legal landscape for crypto entrepreneurs.

Still, he adds that a WLF hack, while probably not very damaging economically, would be a big reputational hit to the crypto industry. “I hope they’re doing their security right. I hope they’ve got all their audits done correctly,” he says. If not, “it would make all of us look a little stupid.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Crypto

Bitcoin drops to $63,000 as U.S. and Israel launch strikes on Iran

Published

on

Bitcoin drops to ,000 as U.S. and Israel launch strikes on Iran

Bitcoin briefly reclaimed $65,000 before pulling back to $64,700 as the Iran conflict continued to escalate through Saturday.

Iranian state media reported at least 70 killed in its Hormozgan province, per Aljazeera, including a strike on an elementary school. Israel activated air raid alerts after detecting fresh missile launches from Iran.

Trump told the Washington Post that “all I want is freedom for the people.” NATO said it was “closely following” developments, China urged an immediate ceasefire, and Turkey offered to mediate.

Bitcoin’s inability to hold $65,000 on the bounce suggests sellers remain in control, but the relative stability given the severity of the headlines points to thin weekend order books rather than active selling pressure.

Headline risks persist for BTC traders as the U.S. day progresses.

Advertisement

What happened earlier

Earlier in the day, BTC neared $63,000 in Saturday trading after the U.S. and Israel launched military strikes on Iran, pushing the largest cryptocurrency down roughly 3% in a matter of hours and extending what had already been a difficult weekend for risk assets.
The move brought bitcoin to its lowest level since the Feb. 5 crash, when the token briefly dipped below $60,000.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz declared an immediate state of emergency across all areas of Israel. A U.S. official confirmed American participation in the strikes, The Wall Street Journal reported.

The sell-off follows a well-established pattern. Bitcoin trades 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, while equity and bond markets are closed on weekends.

That makes it one of the only large, liquid assets available for traders to sell when geopolitical risk spikes outside of traditional market hours.

The result is that bitcoin often acts as a pressure valve for broader risk-off sentiment during weekend events, absorbing selling that would otherwise spread across equities, commodities, and currencies if those markets were open.

Advertisement

The attack risks a wider regional conflict in one of the most economically sensitive parts of the world, following a month-long U.S. military buildup and failed negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Better Cryptocurrency to Buy With $5,000 and Hold Forever: XRP vs. Ethereum | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Better Cryptocurrency to Buy With ,000 and Hold Forever: XRP vs. Ethereum | The Motley Fool

Both Ethereum (ETH 6.03%) and XRP (XRP 3.76%) are tried-and-tested blockchains which have survived (and sometimes thrived) for years on end. That means they’re both sturdy enough to be candidates for a big investment, like $5,000, and for holding over the very long term, or even forever.

So which of these two leading coins is the better option for a forever hold?

Image source: Getty Images.

Ethereum has more ways to grow

Forever is a long time, especially for an investment in an emerging sector like crypto. Therefore, an asset’s optionality regarding where it can derive growth is a key factor, as today’s growth drivers might peter out and new ones are likely to emerge.

On that front, Ethereum has plenty of options. It already hosts a large decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem worth more than $53 billion today, powered by a massive stablecoin base of $159 billion. That existing base of capital is a strategic asset because it gives developers and financial institutions a reason to build new products right where liquidity already lives. It also gives investors exposure to many possible growth lanes at once, from the onboarding of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) to the development of new settlement rails for payments between AI agents.

Advertisement
Ethereum Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-6.03%) $-123.58

Current Price

$1924.97

Another advantage is that Ethereum has a track record of consistently shipping large protocol upgrades. The Pectra upgrade, for example, landed on the mainnet in May 2025, followed by the Fusaka upgrade in December. Two similarly large feature packages are expected for 2026, and they should help to build the chain’s ability to scale up without spiking transaction costs.

If you plan to hold an asset indefinitely, this network’s culture of iterative improvement reduces the risk that its technical capabilities will become irrelevant as emerging opportunities for growth arise. Its habit of attracting and retaining substantial capital also helps prevent that outcome.

XRP has to keep winning specific fights over time

XRP is not a bad crypto asset by any means, but its long-term burden is its far narrower positioning than Ethereum.

Ripple, the coin’s issuer, built the XRP Ledger (XRPL) ecosystem as a toolkit of financial technologies to support specific workflows in institutional finance, especially cross-border payments and money transfers, and, more recently, the management of tokenized asset capital. The coin’s value is thus derived from the utility of its ledger.

Advertisement

That focus could pay off if the financial companies the chain targets like what it’s offering, but it also concentrates risk. Financial institutions move cautiously, and winning them over is a slow, grinding process of catering to their needs and building strong relationships. Their technology adoption process can stall for years, even when the product works, and decision-makers broadly want to adopt the new tech.

To Ripple’s credit, the XRP Ledger includes plenty of features that match institutional requirements and seek to minimize their potential pain points. The network’s authorized trust lines, for instance, let tokenized asset issuers whitelist who can hold their issued tokens, which is a feature that supports regulatory constraints around who can legally custody an asset. Similarly, the ledger supports freezing tokens when suspicious activity appears, which is a control that traditional finance teams tend to expect in regulated asset workflows.

XRP Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-3.76%) $-0.05

Current Price

$1.35

Advertisement

But holding a coin forever is unforgiving of sustained competitive pressure, which XRP doubtlessly faces. Its competitors include fintech companies and other cryptocurrencies, not to mention the internal tech development capabilities of many of its target users in big banks. So it’ll need to continuously one up the other players in its space if it’s going to grow over the long term, and it’s hard to believe that it’ll win every round that counts.

The verdict

The decision here is about resilience and resources.

Advertisement

Ethereum’s “grizzled veteran” reputation today stems from surviving numerous shifts in user demand patterns while maintaining a large on-chain capital pool and growing it all the while. Its success or failure in any given crypto market segment is not guaranteed, nor was it in the past, but its constant evolution has ensured that failures are not fatal, and also that missed opportunities aren’t very damaging overall.

XRP, on the other hand, is only just starting to scale up its on-chain capital base; it has only $418 million in stablecoins. Furthermore, while it has succeeded in attracting some financial institutions to its chain, the truth is that its growth trajectory has not yet been seriously tested, and is still finding an appropriate product-market fit. Its real competitive challenges have only just begun.

So if you want a coin to buy with $5,000 and hold forever, pick the asset that can win without needing to be perfect: Ethereum. XRP is still a decent long-term hold, assuming it’s part of a diversified crypto portfolio, but it’s riskier.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban

Published

on

Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban

Lawmakers Consider Crypto ATM Ban as Scam Losses Rise — Including in Central Minnesota

Minnesota lawmakers are considering banning cryptocurrency kiosks as scam losses continue to rise across the state—including in Central Minnesota.

There are currently about 350 crypto kiosks operating statewide, located in places like gas stations, convenience stores, and grocery stores. These machines allow users to deposit cash and convert it into cryptocurrency, which can then be sent electronically.

Law enforcement officials say scammers are increasingly directing victims to use these kiosks because once the money is sent, it is extremely difficult—if not impossible—to recover.

Police say scams often begin with a phone call, text, or online message. In many cases, scammers pose as government officials, tech support workers, or even romantic partners. Victims are eventually told to withdraw cash and deposit it into a crypto kiosk to “protect” their money or resolve a supposed emergency.

Central Minnesota has seen similar cases. Because St. Cloud serves as a regional hub for shopping and services, crypto kiosks are available locally, giving scammers access points to target area residents.

Advertisement

Some say kiosks also serve legitimate users

Despite the concerns, crypto kiosks do offer legitimate benefits. They allow people to purchase cryptocurrency quickly using cash, without needing a traditional bank account, credit card, or online exchange. Supporters say this can make cryptocurrency more accessible, especially for people who prefer cash transactions or have limited access to banking services.

Crypto kiosks can also be used to send money quickly, including international transfers, without relying on traditional wire services. Some users view them as a convenient way to invest in cryptocurrency or move money electronically without going through a bank.

Companies that operate the machines say the vast majority of transactions are legitimate and that kiosks include warnings about scams. They argue the focus should be on stopping scammers, not banning the machines entirely.

Lawmakers weighing next steps

Supporters of the proposed ban say removing the kiosks could help prevent fraud and protect vulnerable residents, particularly older adults. Law enforcement officials told lawmakers that crypto kiosk scams have resulted in significant financial losses statewide.

Minnesota passed regulations in 2024 requiring some safeguards, including limits on deposits for new users and refund requirements in certain fraud cases. But officials say scammers have continued to adapt.

Advertisement

The bill remains under consideration at the Capitol.

In the meantime, authorities urge Central Minnesota residents to be cautious. Officials emphasize that legitimate government agencies, law enforcement, and businesses will never ask someone to deposit cash into a cryptocurrency kiosk.

As cryptocurrency becomes more common, lawmakers are now weighing whether the risks to consumers outweigh the convenience and accessibility these machines provide.

10 (More) Hilariously Bad Google Reviews of Central MN Landmarks

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending