Connect with us

News

Top Federal Reserve officials leave door open for large interest rate cuts if data worsens

Published

on

Top Federal Reserve officials leave door open for large interest rate cuts if data worsens

Top Federal Reserve officials have left the door open to half-point interest rate cuts, even as they signalled the US central bank would move cautiously at its meeting this month following a mixed jobs report on Friday.

In appearances on Friday, governor Christopher Waller and president John Williams of the New York Fed endorsed a series of rates cuts this year given the fall in inflation and softening of the US labour market.

Now that “downside risks” had increased, Waller said the economic backdrop “requires action” from the Fed to avoid undue damage to the labour market, which he said was “continuing to soften but not deteriorate”.

Waller stressed the economy was “performing in a solid manner” with “good” prospects for continued growth, adding he expected rate cuts would be “done carefully”. The latest jobs report, he said in a moderated discussion, was no cause for panic but represented a return to a more “normal” pace of growth.

But he signalled he was open to cutting more aggressively if the data warranted it — comments that sparked a rally in US Treasuries.

Advertisement

“If the data suggests the need for larger cuts, then I will support that,” he said.

The two-year Treasury yield, which closely tracks interest rate expectations, dropped 0.1 percentage point to 3.65 per cent, while the benchmark 10-year yield fell 0.02 percentage points to 3.71 per cent.

Fed funds futures markets fluctuated on Friday, at one point pricing in a higher probability of a half-point rate cut from the Fed this month. Those bets were scaled back, however, but traders still expect more than a full percentage point of cuts this year, suggesting the central bank may have to escalate its response.

US stocks also sank on Friday, with the S&P 500 down 1.7 per cent and the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite gauge shedding 2.5 per cent by the mid-afternoon in New York.

Williams also signalled that the Fed would react to incoming data as needed even as he underscored the economy remains on solid footing and monetary policy was “well positioned” to keep it that way.

Advertisement

Their comments came just after data showed the US added 142,000 jobs in August, while the unemployment rate ticked lower to 4.2 per cent.

The figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics released on Friday came in below economists’ expectations for 165,000 new positions but surpassed the downwardly revised 89,000 jobs created in July.

A month ago, the BLS reported employment in July rose by just 114,000, which lifted the unemployment rate to 4.3 per cent and sparked concerns that the world’s largest economy was heading for a recession.

Fed officials will meet on September 17-18 when they are expected to agree to lower rates by a quarter point from their current 23-year high of 5.25 per cent to 5.5 per cent.

Analysts said market expectations for a 0.5 percentage point cut in September was an overreaction.

Advertisement

“The market is overly worried about a recession, and this report shows that there is no sign of a recession,” Torsten Slok, Apollo Global Management’s chief economist, said. “There is no need to go 50 [basis points] when the unemployment rate is falling.”

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Fed officials are scrutinising the labour market for signs of weakness as they try to push inflation back down to the central bank’s 2 per cent target, which is based on the annual change in the personal consumption expenditures index.

Core PCE, which strips out volatile food and energy prices and is closely watched by policymakers, was 2.6 per cent in August, compared with a peak of more than 5 per cent in 2022.

The increase in August payrolls was in line with the average pace of jobs growth in recent months but marked a slowdown from the monthly gain of 202,000 over the past 12 months, according to the BLS. Construction and healthcare sectors were the strongest. The manufacturing sector recorded job losses.

Advertisement

Combined, employment in June and July was 86,000 roles lower than previously reported, stoking concerns that the labour market started losing momentum earlier than thought. For the month, average hourly earnings increased 0.4 per cent, translating to a 3.8 per cent year-on-year rise.

Williams forecast the unemployment rate would steady at about 4.25 per cent this year as the economy expanded by as much as 2.5 per cent, indicating little concern about an impending recession.

While Tom Porcelli, chief US economist at PGIM Fixed Income, does not expect the Fed to deliver a half-point cut this month, he said the data warrants multiple ones, underscoring the vast range of views about the economic outlook.

“If you’re waiting for evidence to show up in the most lagging of economic indicators — the payrolls report — then you are already late,” he said.

In an interview on Friday, former New York Fed president William Dudley said he was also fearful the Fed was moving too slowly, having previously advocated for the central bank to cut rates in July. He said both a recession and a soft landing were “in play”.

Advertisement

News

Trump claims US stockpiles mean wars can be fought ‘forever’; Kristi Noem testifies before Congress – US politics live

Published

on

Trump claims US stockpiles mean wars can be fought ‘forever’; Kristi Noem testifies before Congress – US politics live

Trump says US stockpiles mean “wars can be fought ‘forever’”

In a late night post on Truth Social, Donald Trump said that the US munitions stockpiles “at the medium and upper medium grade, never been higher or better”.

He added that the US has a “virtually unlimited supply of these weapons”, meaning that “wars can be fought ‘forever’”.

This comes after Trump said that the US-Israel war on Iran could go beyond the four-five weeks that the administration initially predicted. The president also did not rule out the possibility of US boots on the ground in Iran during an interview with the New York Post on Monday.

Advertisement

“I rebuilt the military in my first term, and continue to do so. The United States is stocked, and ready to WIN, BIG!!!,” he wrote.

Share

Key events

During his opening remarks, Senate judicicary committee chairman, Chuck Grassley, blamed Democrats for the ongoing shutdown Department of Homeland Security (DHS) but highlighted four agencies: the Secret Service, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), and the Coast Guard.

Democrats are demanding tighter guardrails for federal immigration enforcement, but a sweeping tax bill signed into law last year conferred $75bn for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which means the agency is still functional amid the wider department shuttering.

Share
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

Published

on

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

The Supreme Court

Win McNamee/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Win McNamee/Getty Images

The Supreme Court on Monday intervened in New York’s redistricting process, blocking a lower court decision that would likely have flipped a Republican congressional district into a Democratic district.    
  
At issue is the midterm redrawing of New York’s 11th congressional district, including Staten Island and a small part of Brooklyn. The district is currently held by a Republican, but on Jan. 21, a state Supreme Court judge ruled that the current district dilutes the power of Black and Latino voters in violation of the state constitution.  
  
GOP Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, who represents the district, and the Republican co-chair of the state Board of Elections promptly appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to block the redrawing as an unconstitutional “racial gerrymander.” New York’s congressional election cycle was set to officially begin Feb. 24, the opening day for candidates to seek placement on the ballot.  
  
As in this year’s prior mid-decade redistricting fights — in Texas and California — the Trump administration backed the Republicans.   
 
Voters and the State of New York contended it’s too soon for the Supreme Court to wade into this dispute. New York’s highest state court has not issued a final judgment, so the voters asserted that if the Supreme Court grants relief now “future stay applicants will see little purpose in waiting for state court rulings before coming to this Court” and “be rewarded for such gamesmanship.” The state argues this is an issue for “New York courts, not federal courts” to resolve, and there is sufficient time for the dispute to be resolved on the merits. 
  
The court majority explained the decision to intervene in 101 words, which the three dissenting liberal justices  summarized as “Rules for thee, but not for me.” 
 
The unsigned majority order does not explain the Court’s rationale. It says only how long the stay will last, until the case moves through the New York State appeals courts. If, however, the losing party petitions and the court agrees to hear the challenge, the stay extends until the final opinion is announced. 
 
Dissenting from the decision were Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Writing for the three, Sotomayor  said that  if nonfinal decisions of a state trial court can be brought to highest court, “then every decision from any court is now fair game.” More immediately, she noted, “By granting these applications, the Court thrusts itself into the middle of every election-law dispute around the country, even as many States redraw their congressional maps ahead of the 2026 election.” 

Monday’s Supreme Court action deviates from the court’s hands-off pattern in these mid-term redistricting fights this year. In two previous cases — from Texas and California — the court refused to intervene, allowing newly drawn maps to stay in effect.  
  
Requests for Supreme Court intervention on redistricting issues has been a recurring theme this term, a trend that is likely to grow.  Earlier last month  the high court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map.  California’s redistricting came in response to a GOP-friendly redistricting plan in Texas that the Supreme Court also permitted to move forward. These redistricting efforts are expected to offset one another.     
   
But the high court itself has yet to rule on a challenge to Louisiana’s voting map, which was drawn by the state legislature after the decennial census in order to create a second majority-Black district.  Since the drawing of that second majority-black district, the state has backed away from that map, hoping to return to a plan that provides for only one majority-minority district.    
     
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the Louisiana case has stretched across two terms. The justices failed to resolve the case last term and chose to order a second round of arguments this term adding a new question: Does the state’s intentional creation of a second majority-minority district violate the constitution’s Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments’ guarantee of the right to vote and the authority of Congress to enforce that mandate?    
Following the addition of the new question, the state of Louisiana flipped positions to oppose the map it had just drawn and defended in court. Whether the Supreme Court follows suit remains to be seen. But the tone of the October argument suggested that the court’s conservative supermajority is likely to continue undercutting the 1965 Voting Rights Act.   

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Published

on

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 3 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “weak,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Pacific time. The New York Times

A minor earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 3.5 struck in Central California on Monday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 7:17 a.m. Pacific time about 6 miles northwest of Pinnacles, Calif., data from the agency shows.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Monday, March 2 at 10:20 a.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Monday, March 2 at 11:18 a.m. Eastern.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending