Connect with us

News

Court puts block on sale of Raiffeisen bank’s Russian arm

Published

on

Court puts block on sale of Raiffeisen bank’s Russian arm

Stay informed with free updates

A Russian court has blocked any potential sale of Raiffeisen Bank International’s subsidiary in Russia, a move that traps the largest western lender still operating inside the country. 

In a statement on Thursday evening, Vienna-headquartered RBI said a temporary injunction issued by a judge in the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad on the Baltic coast had put a freeze on the transfer of any ownership of shares in its Russian arm. 

It is unclear how long the order will last. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for October 16. The injunction relates to a civil case brought by companies associated with the oligarch Oleg Deripaska, and a $2.2bn claim for “non-fulfilment of financial obligations”.

Advertisement

“This complicates the sales process in which RBI seeks to sell a controlling stake in [its subsidiary] — and will inevitably lead to further delays,” the bank said. “RBI will attempt to reverse today’s court decision by all legal means.”

The move echoes other recent efforts by powerful Russian businessmen close to the Kremlin to use the country’s court system to exercise control over or seize western businesses that still operate there.

Germany’s Volkswagen had its assets frozen by a Russian court last year in the midst of its own attempted exit from the country. The measure was widely seen as a move to pressure the company into accepting an even lower price for its subsidiary.

RBI has so far operated with relative freedom in Russia, while coming under mounting pressure from western governments and regulators to scale back and divest its business there, even as its profits from it have surged. 

The Austrian bank’s executives have long insisted they have been caught in an intractable situation: on the one hand, threatened by western sanctions because of the role their bank continues to play in supporting the Russian economy, but also unable to advance sales talks because of punitive restrictions imposed by the Kremlin on ownership changes or dividend payments.

Advertisement

Western security officials and politicians, meanwhile, have grown impatient with RBI, particularly as the Russian economy has continued to prove resilient in the face of western economic restrictions. 

In May the European Central Bank ordered RBI and other European lenders still operating in Russia to accelerate efforts to wind down their businesses there if they were unable to sell them.

RBI has previously said it was in discussions with two potential suitors in Russia interested in acquiring its subsidiary there, but that orders for it to scale back its activities have had a negative impact on negotiations.

RBI’s Russian subsidiary nevertheless contributed more than half of the banking group’s total profits in the first six months of this year. 

The bank has dramatically shrunk its Russian lending book and offers economically unattractive returns on savings locally, but it has continued to draw Russian depositors due to it being perceived as a safe western institution. Thanks to the high rates it earns on deposits at the Russian central bank, it has profited handsomely. 

Advertisement

RBI said the court injunction was issued as part of a lawsuit brought by the Russian company Rasperia. Rasperia was formerly owned by Deripaska and continues to be associated with him, according to western security officials. 

Earlier this year Rasperia had attempted to swap its large stake in the Austrian construction company Strabag with RBI in return for control of RBI’s Russian subsidiary, a complicated arrangement intended to skirt western sanctions.

The transaction was called off under pressure from the US government. 

Rasperia on August 19 filed a complaint against Strabag and several other entities, including RBI’s affiliate in Lower Austria and Strabag shareholder and founder Hans Peter Haselsteiner, Kaliningrad court records show.

Advertisement

News

Concert promoter Live Nation settles US monopoly case over ticket sales

Published

on

Concert promoter Live Nation settles US monopoly case over ticket sales

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Live Nation has agreed to a preliminary settlement with the US government to end a monopoly case brought by the Department of Justice, in a deal that would stop short of breaking up the company.

The DoJ and some US states have reached a deal with Live Nation, which is the parent company of Ticketmaster, less than a week after trial began in New York, according to a senior justice department official. But 27 other state attorneys-general have refused to join the agreement, arguing it benefits Live Nation. 

The DoJ in 2024 sued Live Nation, accusing it of operating a monopoly that “suffocates its competition” in the live entertainment industry. The government alleged that the company illegally dominated the market for ticketing and concert promotion, using “exclusionary conduct” to wield an outsized influence over the majority of live concert venues across the US.

Advertisement

The lawsuit came amid growing discontent among fans, rivals, artists and US lawmakers, who have accused Live Nation of abusing its market power by charging exorbitant fees and retaliating against venues that choose to work with rivals.

It followed a fiasco during the ticket sale of Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour in 2022, when Ticketmaster’s website was overwhelmed by massive demand.

The terms of the deal, which will have to be confirmed by a federal court, include Live Nation offering a product that will allow other ticketing companies to use its technology. It would also let go of 13 amphitheatres it owns or controls — a number that may rise if other states join the agreement. 

The deal “opens up markets for other competitors, which will allow for competition that previously didn’t exist in primary ticketing and in the live entertainment space”, said a senior DoJ official. 

“That competition is going to have a direct impact on prices coming down,” he added. “It’ll also give consumers more options and not feel like they just have to go through Live Nation or Ticketmaster.”

Advertisement

But New York state attorney-general Letitia James, who has led a bipartisan group of states suing Live Nation, on Monday said in a statement that the agreement “fails to address the monopoly at the center of this case, and would benefit Live Nation at the expense of consumers. We cannot agree to it.”

“[W]e will continue our lawsuit to protect consumers and restore fair competition to the live entertainment industry,” she added.

Live Nation did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Continue Reading

News

Warrants served in New Jersey, Pennsylvania as feds look into possible NYC terrorism

Published

on

Warrants served in New Jersey, Pennsylvania as feds look into possible NYC terrorism

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

New York Police Department Commissioner Jessica Tisch said Monday that the case involving two men accused of throwing improvised explosive devices near Gracie Mansion is being investigated as an “act of ISIS-inspired terrorism.”

Speaking during a press conference alongside Mayor Zohran Mamdani, Tisch said the suspects, Amir Balat and Ibrahim Kayumi, will be prosecuted in federal court in Manhattan.

She said a criminal complaint outlining the charges and factual allegations is expected to be made public later Monday.

Tisch declined to discuss specific details of the ongoing investigation, citing the pending federal prosecution, but confirmed that authorities are treating the case as terrorism-related.

Advertisement

The announcement comes after Fox News previously reported that federal agents served search warrants in New Jersey and Pennsylvania tied to explosive devices thrown during a protest in New York City.

A New York Police Department source told Fox News that devices hurled into the crowd were packed with nuts, bolts and screws, and contained a chemical substance inside a taped canister fitted with a fuse.

Balat and Kayumi, who were arrested on Saturday, remained in custody as federal teams searched their homes in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, according to federal sources.

Investigators also executed a warrant at a related address in New Jersey.

NYPD Bomb Squad officers search a car on March 8, 2026, in New York City. (Ryan Murphy/Getty)

Advertisement

Other federal sources told Fox News on Monday morning that a “terror investigation” is now underway after confirmed improvised explosive devices and a suspicious device were discovered near Gracie Mansion over the weekend.

Sources said the two suspects, Balat and Kayumi, allegedly made pro-ISIS statements while in custody.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Investigators are also examining their past travel, including trips to Turkey and potentially other locations known as terror training grounds.

This is a developing story; check back for updates.

Advertisement

Related Article

Video shows NYPD tackling man who allegedly threw ‘ignited device’ near NYC mayor's home during protest clash
Continue Reading

News

Video: Airports Struggle to Staff T.S.A. During Partial Government Shutdown

Published

on

Video: Airports Struggle to Staff T.S.A. During Partial Government Shutdown

new video loaded: Airports Struggle to Staff T.S.A. During Partial Government Shutdown

Screening delays come as spring break travel is ramping up and as Transportation Security Administration workers are going without pay for the second time in six months because of the partial government shutdown.

March 8, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending