Connect with us

News

Nvidia faces looming test on use of chips

Published

on

Nvidia faces looming test on use of chips

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Rivals of Nvidia, which dominates the market for AI chips, have long hoped that an inflection point would help them make up lost ground.

That point may be at hand. So far, however, there is little sign of Nvidia ceding its lead — though it is still an open question as to whether the AI market will develop in ways that eventually erode its dominance.

The key issue is when the main focus in AI moves from training the large “foundation” models that underpin modern AI systems, to putting those models into widespread use in the applications used by large numbers of consumers and businesses.

Advertisement

With their ability to handle multiple computations in parallel, Nvidia’s powerful graphical processing units, or GPUs, have maintained their dominance of data-intensive AI training. By contrast, running queries against these AI models — known as inference — is a less demanding activity that could provide an opening for makers of less powerful — and cheaper — chips.

Anyone expecting a quick shift will have been disappointed. Nvidia’s lead in this newer market already looks formidable. Announcing its latest earnings on Thursday, it said more than 40 per cent of its data centre sales over the past 12 months were already tied to inference, accounting for more than $33bn in revenue. That is more than two and a half times the entire sales of Intel’s data centre division over the same period.

But how the inference market will develop from here is uncertain. Two questions will determine the outcome: whether the AI business continues to be dominated by a race to build ever larger AI models, and where most of the inference will take place.

Nvidia’s fortunes have been heavily tied to the race for scale. Chief executive Jensen Huang said this week that it takes “10, 20, 40 times the compute” to train each new generation of large AI models, guaranteeing huge demand for Nvidia’s forthcoming Blackwell chips. These new processors will also provide the most efficient way run inferences against these “multitrillion parameter models”, he added.

Yet it is not clear whether ever-larger models will continue to dominate the market, or whether these will eventually hit a point of diminishing returns. At the same time, smaller models that promise many of the same benefits, as well as less capable models designed for narrower tasks, are already coming into vogue. Meta, for instance, recently claimed that its new Llama 3.1 could match the performance of the advanced models such as OpenAI’s GPT-4, despite being far smaller.

Advertisement

Improved training techniques, often relying on larger amounts of high-quality data, have helped. Once trained, the biggest models can also be “distilled” in smaller versions. Such developments promise to bring more of the work of AI inference to smaller, or “edge”, data centres, and on to smartphones and PCs. “AI workloads will go closer to where the data is, or where the users are,” says Arun Chandrasekaran, an analyst at Gartner.

The range of competitors with an eye on this nascent market has been growing rapidly. Mobile chip company Qualcomm, for instance, has been the first to produce chips capable of powering a new class of AI-capable PCs, matching a design laid out by Microsoft — a development that throws down a direct challenge to longtime PC chip leader Intel.

The data centre market, meanwhile, has attracted a wide array of would-be competitors, from start-ups like Cerebras and Groq to tech giants like Meta and Amazon, which have developed their own inference chips.

It is inevitable that Nvidia will lose market share as AI inference moves to devices where it does not yet have a presence, and to the data centres of cloud companies that favour in-house chip designs. But to defend its turf, it is leaning heavily on the software strategy that has long acted as a moat around its hardware, with tools that make it easier for developers to put its chips to use.

This time, it is working on a wider range of enterprise software to help companies build applications that make best use of AI — something that would also guarantee demand for its chips. Nvidia disclosed this week that it expects its revenue from this software to reach an annual run-rate of $2bn by the end of this year. The figure is small for a company expected to produce total revenue of more than $100bn, but points to the increasing take-up of technologies that should increase the “stickiness” of products. The AI chip market may be entering a new phase, but Nvidia’s grip shows no signs of being loosened.

Advertisement

richard.waters@ft.com

News

New Jersey’s special Democratic primary too early to call

Published

on

New Jersey’s special Democratic primary too early to call

FILE – Analilia Mejia, center, speaks during a rally calling for SCOTUS ethics reform, May 2, 2023, in Washington.

Joy Asico/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Joy Asico/AP

TRENTON, N.J. — The race in New Jersey between a onetime political director for Sen. Bernie Sanders and a former congressman was too early to call Thursday, in a special House Democratic primary for a seat that was vacated after Mikie Sherill was elected governor.

Former U.S. Rep. Tom Malinowski started election night with a significant lead over Analilia Mejia, based largely on early results from mail-in ballots. The margin narrowed as results from votes cast that day were tallied.

Advertisement

With more than 61,000 votes counted, Mejia led Malinowski by 486, or less than 1 percentage point.

All three counties in the district report some mail-in ballots yet to be processed. Also, mail-in ballots postmarked by election day can arrive as late as Wednesday and still be counted.

Malinowski did better than Mejia among the mail-in ballots already counted in all three counties, leaving the outcome of the race uncertain.

The Democratic winner will face Randolph Mayor Joe Hathaway, who was unopposed in the Republican primary, on April 16.

Malinowski served two terms in the House before losing a bid for reelection in a different district in 2022. He had the endorsement of New Jersey Democratic Sen. Andy Kim, who has built support among progressive groups.

Advertisement
FILE - Democratic Congressman Tom Malinowski speaks during his election night party in Garwood, N.J., Nov. 8, 2022.

FILE – Democratic Congressman Tom Malinowski speaks during his election night party in Garwood, N.J., Nov. 8, 2022.

Andres Kudacki/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Andres Kudacki/AP

Advertisement

Mejia, a former head of the Working Families Alliance in the state and political director for Sanders during his 2020 presidential run, had the Vermont independent senator’s endorsement as well as that of U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez of New York. She also worked in President Joe Biden’s Labor Department as deputy director of the women’s bureau.

Both Malinowski and Mejia were well ahead of the next-closest candidates: Brendan Gill, an elected commissioner in Essex County who has close ties to former Gov. Phil Murphy; and Tahesha Way, who served as lieutenant governor and secretary of state for two terms under Murphy until last month.

The other candidates were John Bartlett, Zach Beecher, J-L Cauvin, Marc Chaaban, Cammie Croft, Dean Dafis, Jeff Grayzel, Justin Strickland and Anna Lee Williams.

The district covers parts of Essex, Morris and Passaic counties in northern New Jersey, including some of New York City’s wealthier suburbs.

Advertisement

The special primary and April general election will determine who serves the remainder of Sherrill’s term, which ends next January. There will be a regular primary in June and general election in November for the next two-year term.

Sherrill, also a Democrat, represented the district for four terms after her election in 2018. She won despite the region’s historical loyalty to the GOP, a dynamic that began to shift during President Donald Trump’s first term.

Continue Reading

News

Video: Investigators Say Doorbell Camera Was Disconnected Before Nancy Guthrie’s Kidnapping

Published

on

Video: Investigators Say Doorbell Camera Was Disconnected Before Nancy Guthrie’s Kidnapping

new video loaded: Investigators Say Doorbell Camera Was Disconnected Before Nancy Guthrie’s Kidnapping

More details and a timeline were released on the kidnapping of Nancy Guthrie, the mother of the NBC anchor Savannah Guthrie.

By McKinnon de Kuyper

February 5, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Republicans pan Democrats’ demands for ICE reform in DHS funding, with little time to reach deal

Published

on

Republicans pan Democrats’ demands for ICE reform in DHS funding, with little time to reach deal

Washington — Senate Republicans criticized Democrats’ list of demands to rein in Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Thursday, further reducing the odds of reaching a deal to keep the Department of Homeland Security funded beyond next week’s deadline.

“As of right now, we aren’t anywhere close to having any sort of an agreement that would enable us to fund the Department of Homeland Security,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune said on the Senate floor Thursday.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries released a list of policies to impose “guardrails” on DHS on Wednesday night, including by restricting immigration agents from wearing masks and requiring them to display an ID and use body cameras. The Democrats also demanded agents be banned from entering private property without judicial warrants, along with requiring agents to verify that someone is not a U.S. citizen before holding them in immigration detention, among other things.

“The American people rightfully expect their elected representatives to take action to rein in ICE and ensure no more lives are lost. It is critical that we come together to impose common sense reforms and accountability measures that the American people are demanding,” Schumer and Jeffries wrote. 

The Democrats also said there are steps the administration can take immediately to “show good faith,” including removing DHS Secretary Kristi Noem from her position and fully ramping down the immigration operation in Minneapolis. 

Advertisement

Thune, a South Dakota Republican, called Democrats’ demands “unrealistic and unserious,” while saying they aren’t “even willing to engage in a negotiation and discussion to try and reach a result.”

“This is not a blank-check situation where Republicans just agree to a list of Democrat demands,” Thune said. 

Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 5, 2026.

Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images

Advertisement


Off the Senate floor, Thune told reporters that there are a number of things on Democrats’ list of demands that appear to be designed as “messaging” priorities, but he acknowledged that “there’s some room there.”

“There’s some things that could get done,” Thune said. “But, you know, you have to have people at the table to do that.”

Sen. Katie Britt of Alabama, who’s leading the negotiations for Senate Republicans, quickly responded to Democrats’ demands on X Wednesday night. She called the proposal a “ridiculous Christmas list of demands for the press.”

“This is NOT negotiating in good faith, and it’s NOT what the American people want,” Britt said. “They continue to play politics to their radical base at the expense of the safety of Americans. DHS, FEMA, Secret Service, and the Coast Guard run out of money in 9 days. Democrats don’t seem to care one bit.”

Earlier in the day Wednesday, Schumer and Jeffries held a news conference where they outlined some of the demands. They encouraged Republicans to “get serious” about negotiations on reforming the nation’s immigration enforcement operation. 

Advertisement

“This is turning America inside out in a way we haven’t seen in a very long time,” Schumer said. 

The back and forth comes after the House voted to fund the bulk of the government earlier this week, following a four-day partial shutdown. The package extended funding for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE and Customs and Border Protection, through Feb. 13. The move was meant to give lawmakers time to negotiate long-term funding and reforms to ICE and CBP. 

Thune pointed to the tight timeline Thursday. He noted that Democrats insisted that DHS only be funded for two weeks. 

“We have one week and one day left to pass the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill,” Thune said. “The onus is on Democrats to negotiate in good faith and reach an agreement quickly.”

Thune argued that Democrats have “reopened” negotiations, which means “taking up ideas and priorities from both sides.” He pointed to the need for a “serious discussion” about the “climate of harassment — and worse — that law enforcement has been facing, simply trying to do their jobs.” 

Advertisement

He said the issue of cooperation between federal and local law enforcement must also be discussed, saying “too many jurisdictions prohibit local law enforcement from cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement,” in an apparent nod to so-called sanctuary city policies that Republicans have widely opposed. 

“I hope my Democrat colleagues are ready to have some conversations with the White House about these and other issues,” Thune said. 

The majority leader argued that “the White House has demonstrated that it’s taking things seriously,” pointing to a recent move to require all agents in Minneapolis to wear body cameras and the administration’s move to withdraw some personnel from the city.

“I want to see my Democrat colleagues take things seriously as well,” he added.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending