Follow us on social media:
The Rhode Island high school girls volleyball season is nearly upon us.
Teams have worked their serve/receives all summer and it will all be on display as games start in earnest on Tuesday, Sept. 3. The sport was reduced to three divisions this season with movement across the board.
We know that there will be at least two new champions this fall after East Providence was bumped up to Division I. The Townies raced to an undefeated season last fall and captured the D-II title. And in D-III, Burrillville edged Tolman in five sets, but the Broncos are off to the state’s second league.
More: Why Barrington girls volleyball has a near-perfect championship blueprint to follow
North Kingstown seeks its third straight title in D-I, but there are competitors lurking at everywhere and the Providence Journal is excited to get to the action.
For now, here are 10 girls volleyball players to keep an eye on this fall.
Auth certainly has the size at 6-foot-1 to warrant attention. But it’s the combination of size and hit power in the middle that stands out for the Bulldog. Westerly went 10-5 last season and should duplicate that success again this season.
A quick look at the 2024 RIIL girls tennis season – plus 10 players to watch for this fall
D’Agostino led the Rams to a 10-6 mark last year and a spot in the Final Four. La Salle was ultimately upended by North Kingstown in straight sets, but the specialist garnered recognition for her play by making the Providence Journal All-State second team.
Garrepy, daughter of Skippers’ coach Brian Garrepy, landed on the All-State second team as a freshman and enters the 2024 campaign as one of the top players in the state. North Kingstown won its second of back-to-back championships last fall and should threaten to make it a dynasty.
More: Here are 10 RI high school boys soccer players to keep an eye on this season
Part of the reason North Kingstown enters as a way-too-early favorite is Henson. The senior is tabbed to replace the 2023 Gatorade player of the year, Ella Maack, at setter for the Skippers. Henson was already an all-stater at libero last year (181 digs to go with 54 assists) but transitions to lead NK’s potent offense.
Labonte led the Patriots in kills and digs and was just behind Caitlin Mediate in aces last fall. Behind the two seniors, Portsmouth could reach the D-I playoffs for the third straight season.
LaFrenier is one of the top hitters in the state and will demand attention at the net. North Kingstown has a long lineage of stars and the senior could be next up on that list.
Barrington was close to pulling off the semifinal upset against East Providence last year. The Eagles dropped the fifth set, 16-14, but almost every team goes through heartbreak before winning. Need proof? The Barrington boys lost in similar fashion in 2023 before winning the title last spring. McCrann, now a junior, earned D-II second-team honors from the league’s coaches last year. Martin, now a senior, joined her on that team.
The Patriots earned the four seed in D-I last fall and took No. 5 La Salle to five sets before falling, 15-13, in the final set. If not for NK’s Ella Maack, Mediate would have been the ProJo’s first-team All-State setter. But she’s back for another season with the Patriots and is one to watch this fall.
Mullen is the only All-State hitter returning after graduation losses last year. The Townies dropped to D-II last season and went undefeated, winning the title in straight sets. They’re in D-I this season with the junior leading the way.
The Rebels halted North Kingstown’s reign in the fall of 2021 with a 25-17, 14-25, 25-18, 21-25, 15-9 win in the semifinals. They then topped Prout for the program’s first state championship. SK reached the finals again the following year, but was undone by the Skippers. A potential return to the pinnacle would be aided by Vaughn-Hallene at the net.
jrousseau@providencejournal.com
On X: @ByJacobRousseau
New East Bay Bike Path bridges are open and ready for bikes
What’s it like to ride over the new East Bay Bike Path bridges? We sent a reporter to try them out.
I’ve long thought bike paths are among Rhode Island’s premier attractions, up there with the beaches, the mansions and the bay.
We like to knock government, but credit where it’s due, the state has done an amazing job building out an incredible pedaling network.
It’s clearly a priority.
At least I thought it was.
But they’ve just dropped the ball on what should have been a beautiful new stretch.
The plan was to finish a mile-long connector from the East Providence end of the Henderson Bridge all the way to the East Bay Bike Path.
There was even $25 million set aside to get it done.
Except WPRI recently reported that it’s now been canceled.
The main fault lies with the Trump administration, which is no friend of bike paths, and moved to kill that $25 million.
But it gets complicated, as government funding always does.
To try to rescue that money, the state DOT reportedly worked with the administration to refunnel it into a road project. Specifically, the $25 million will now be spent helping upgrade the mile-long highway between the Henderson Bridge and North Broadway in East Providence, turning it into a more pleasant boulevard.
That totally sounds worthy.
But it’s insane to throw away the bike path plan.
Especially for a particular reason in this case.
They’d already put a ton of money into starting it.
When state planners designed the new Henderson Bridge between the East Side and East Providence, they included a bike path.
It’s a beauty – well protected from traffic by a barrier, a great asset for safely riding over the Seekonk River.
The plan was to continue it another mile or so along East Providence’s Waterfront Drive, ultimately connecting with the East Bay Bike Path, which runs all the way to Bristol. Which, by the way, is one of the nicest bike paths you’ll find anywhere.
But alas, that connector plan has been canceled.
So the expensive stretch over the Henderson Bridge to East Providence is now a bike path to nowhere. Once the bridge ends, the path on it continues a few hundred yards or so and then, just … ends.
Too bad.
We were so close.
Most of the stories on the issue have been about the complex negotiation to rescue the $25 million by rerouting it to that nearby highway-to-boulevard project. But I don’t want to get lost in the weeds of that bureaucratic process here because it loses sight of the heart of this story.
Which is that an amazing new addition to one of the nation’s best state bike path systems has just been scrapped.
You can knock the Rhode Island government for blowing a lot of things.
The PawSox.
The Washington Bridge.
But they’ve done great with bike paths.
And especially, linking many of them together.
Example: not too many years ago, Providence bikers had to risk dicey traffic on the East Side to get to the more pleasant paths in India Point Park and on the 195 bridge to the East Bay Path.
But the state fixed that by adding an amazing connector that starts behind the Salvation Army building and beautifully winds along the water of the Seekonk River for a mile or so.
That makes a huge difference – and no doubt has avoided some bike-car accidents.
We were close to a comparable stretch on the other side of the river – that’s what the $25 million would have done.
But it’s now apparently dead.
Online commenters aren’t happy about it.
On a Reddit string, “Toadscoper” accused the state of being “complicit” with the feds in rerouting the money from bikes to cars.
And there was this fascinating post from FineLobster 5322, who apparently is a disappointed planner who worked on the project: “Mind you money has already been spent on phase one so rejecting it at this point is wasting money and also against the public interest … but what do I know? I only worked on the project as an engineer … I didn’t get into this to build more highways. I do it … to give back to communities and give them more access to their environment.”
Wow. One can imagine the state planning team is devastated. That’s not a small consideration. Good people go into government to make life better in Rhode Island, and it’s a bad play to take the spirit out of the job by first assigning a great human-scale project and then, after a ton of work, trashing it.
A poster named Homosapiens simply said, “We just accept this?”
Hopefully not.
The first stretch of the path over the Henderson Bridge is done, money already sunk.
What a shame to leave that as a path to nowhere.
It doesn’t have to happen.
Between Governor McKee and our Washington delegation, there’s got to be a way to get this done.
There’s got to be.
mpatinki@providencejournal.com
WARWICK, R.I. (WPRI) — Two people are dead and another person seriously hurt after a crash involving two vehicles on the highway in Warwick Saturday.
Rhode Island State Police said the crash happened around 1:34 p.m. on the ramp from Route 113 West to I-95 South.
According to police, a Hyundai SUV that was driving in the middle lane of the highway started to drift to the right, crossed the first lane, and then crossed onto the on-ramp lane. The car struck the guardrail twice before driving through the grass median.
The Hyundai then struck the driver’s side of a Mercedes SUV that was on the ramp, causing the Mercedes to roll over and come to a rest. The impact sent the Hyundai over the guardrail and down an embankment.
The driver of the Hyundai, a 73-year-old man, and his passenger, a 69-year-old woman, were both pronounced dead at the hospital.
A woman who was in the Mercedes was rushed to Rhode Island Hospital in critical condition.
State police said all lanes of traffic were reopened by 4:30 p.m.
The investigation remains ongoing.
Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.
Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.
Follow us on social media:
A federal judge on Friday tossed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit aiming to force Rhode Island to hand over its voter information as part of the Trump administration’s push to acquire voter data from several states.
Rhode Island U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy wrote that federal law does not allow the DOJ “to conduct the kind of fishing expedition it seeks here,” siding with Rhode Island election officials. She added that the DOJ did not provide evidence to suggest that Rhode Island violated election law.
McElroy, a Trump appointee, wrote that she sided with the similar decision in Oregon. That decision ruled that the DOJ was not entitled to unredacted voter registration lists.
“Absent from the demand are any factual allegations suggesting that Rhode Island may be violating the list maintenance requirements,” she said in her ruling.
Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore (D) praised McElroy’s decision. He said in a statement that the Trump administration “seems to have no problem taking actions that are clear Constitutional overreaches, regularly meddling in responsibilities that are the rights of the states.”
“Today’s decision affirms our position: the United States Department of Justice has no legal right to – or need for – the personally-identifiable information in our voter file,” he said. “Voter list maintenance is a responsibility entrusted to the states, and I remain confident in the steps we take here in Rhode Island to keep our list as accurate as possible.”
The Hill reached out to the DOJ for comment.
The DOJ called for the voter lists as it investigated Rhode Island’s compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allowed Americans to register to vote when they apply for a driver’s license.
The DOJ sued at least 30 states, as well as Washington, D.C., in December demanding their respective voter data. This data includes birth dates, names and partial Social Security numbers.
At least 12 states have given or said they will give the DOJ their voter registration lists, according to a tracker operated by the Brennan Center for Justice.
The department stated after it lost a similar suit against Massachusetts earlier this month that it had “sweeping powers” to access the voter data and that, if states fail to comply, courts have a “limited, albeit vital, role” in directing election officers on behalf of the administration to produce the records. The DOJ cited the Civil Rights Act as being intended to unearth alleged election law violations.
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Distress call captures tanker under fire, Iran shuts Hormuz trapping thousands of sailors
Trump ally diGenova tapped to lead DOJ probe into Brennan over Russia probe origins
Experts reveal why ‘nonnamaxxing’ trend may improve mental, physical health
‘Demon’ Finn Balor settles score with Dominik Mysterio at WrestleMania 42
iPhone and Samsung flashlight tricks you should know
David Ellison hits CinemaCon, vowing to make more movies with Paramount-Warner Bros.
Larry David discusses ‘Curb Your Enthusiasm,’ ‘Seinfeld’ legacies and new HBO series
Nine non-negotiable items for a well-designed life