Connect with us

Business

Opinion: My business won't flee California like SpaceX or Chevron. But we do want some changes

Published

on

Opinion: My business won't flee California like SpaceX or Chevron. But we do want some changes

Businesses both small and large are fleeing California in search of friendlier pastures.

From 2018 through 2021, 352 companies relocated their headquarters from California to other states. The rate of exit more than doubled from 2020 to 2021 and was highest in Los Angeles County, an analysis by the Hoover Institution at Stanford University found.

The wave of departures has continued in 2024: Last month Elon Musk announced he will move SpaceX from Hawthorne to Texas, and this month Chevron announced plans to move its headquarters to the Lone Star State as well.

It’s part of a larger pattern. Headquarters and manufacturing plants are closing down and relocating operations to cities in Texas, Nevada and Florida. The Farmer John Meatpacking plant, a fixture of the Los Angeles meat industry for nearly a century, ceased operations and left the city to continue business elsewhere last year.

While the exodus has been headlined by a few big names, I often hear that medium to small businesses are quitting the city quietly, unburdened by public disclosure requirements and individually too small to register in media reports.

Advertisement

The explanations are varied, but the ultimate reason is clear: Los Angeles is an increasingly difficult place to operate a business. Affordability issues including high taxes and escalating labor, utility and energy costs, in addition to burdensome liability and punitive regulations, top the daily challenges. California perpetually resides at the bottom of state rankings of business favorability.

These factors are compounded by the enticing pull of recruitment efforts by other cities, including the promise of governmental partnership — especially appealing to Golden State businesspeople who complain of treatment as diverse as apathy and outright animosity from local officials.

Tantalized by prospects of greater opportunity, profitability and incentives out of state, the rational business mind makes a compelling case to leave. It practically screams it.

So this may sound crazy: Despite the mounting challenges in Los Angeles, my family-owned business isn’t going anywhere.

We care deeply about cost savings, efficiency and growth opportunities, and we recognize profitability as imperative to survival. But like many other small businesses in Los Angeles, we measure success and derive value beyond just profit and loss.

Advertisement

I am the proud owner of a four-generation beef jerky company that has called Los Angeles home for nearly 100 years. It brings me immeasurable joy to work in the same brick building built by my great-grandfather, greet customers who knew my grandfather, and share an office with my father. You can’t put a price tag on legacy. This legacy of course extends to our employees, many of whom have dedicated more than 25 years to our business, or have gone on to achieve successful careers elsewhere and even start their own businesses.

Rather than chase cheaper labor, our company would rather invest in our employees through health benefits and professional development as well as cultivate a sense of family. Other states have tried to recruit our business to leave California, but among the reasons we have refused is that we don’t want to abandon these connections.

We also value our role as part of L.A.’s communities. This year we launched a program targeting causes that align with our mission — supporting youth, families and active lifestyles — through monetary and product donation, as well as volunteering our time and expertise.

That’s the difference between huge corporations and small businesses. The former each employs thousands of local residents and contributes robust tax revenue to the city at a scale we can’t match. But larger companies — whether publicly traded, backed by private equity or international holding firms, and sometimes led by celebrity billionaires — are moving targets. They will pursue shareholder value at all costs regardless of regional ties or other considerations.

Meanwhile, there are 4.1 million small businesses in California that generate 7.5 million jobs, representing 47% of private-sector jobs. More importantly, two out of three net new jobs come from a small business.

Advertisement

Although corporations are important to L.A.’s financial ecosystem and should continue to be recruited, small businesses should not be discounted. Just because my business and others have chosen to stay here doesn’t mean we should be taken for granted.

In good news, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce reported a 7.8% increase in new business applications in California from 2022 to 2023. Los Angeles County may lead the state in departures, but it also had the most business applications during that year — 160,925. The challenge is getting them to stay.

To that end, we are rallying our peers around a common goal of improving the business landscape. These efforts have coalesced in the Made in LA Coalition working to raise consumer awareness about products manufactured in Los Angeles.

Some of the key initiatives we’d like to see include financial incentives for local manufacturing that encourage job creation and advancement, protections against pernicious lawsuits by bad actors seeking personal gain rather than the public good, and a commitment by the local government officials to use their platform and reach to celebrate the businesses, and people behind the businesses, who are committed to the city.

That kind of investment will help make Los Angeles a place where both business and community can thrive long term.

Advertisement

Brian Bianchetti is the fourth-generation CEO of People’s Choice Beef Jerky.

Business

California-based company recalls thousands of cases of salad dressing over ‘foreign objects’

Published

on

California-based company recalls thousands of cases of salad dressing over ‘foreign objects’

A California food manufacturer is recalling thousands of cases of salad dressing distributed to major retailers over potential contamination from “foreign objects.”

The company, Irvine-based Ventura Foods, recalled 3,556 cases of the dressing that could be contaminated by “black plastic planting material” in the granulated onion used, according to an alert issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Ventura Foods voluntarily initiated the recall of the product, which was sold at Costco, Publix and several other retailers across 27 states, according to the FDA.

None of the 42 locations where the product was sold were in California.

Ventura Foods said it issued the recall after one of its ingredient suppliers recalled a batch of onion granules that the company had used n some of its dressings.

Advertisement

“Upon receiving notice of the supplier’s recall, we acted with urgency to remove all potentially impacted product from the marketplace. This includes urging our customers, their distributors and retailers to review their inventory, segregate and stop the further sale and distribution of any products subject to the recall,” said company spokesperson Eniko Bolivar-Murphy in an emailed statement. “The safety of our products is and will always be our top priority.”

The FDA issued its initial recall alert in early November. Costco also alerted customers at that time, noting that customers could return the products to stores for a full refund. The affected products had sell-by dates between Oct. 17 and Nov. 9.

The company recalled the following types of salad dressing:

  • Creamy Poblano Avocado Ranch Dressing and Dip
  • Ventura Caesar Dressing
  • Pepper Mill Regal Caesar Dressing
  • Pepper Mill Creamy Caesar Dressing
  • Caesar Dressing served at Costco Service Deli
  • Caesar Dressing served at Costco Food Court
  • Hidden Valley, Buttermilk Ranch
Continue Reading

Business

They graduated from Stanford. Due to AI, they can’t find a job

Published

on

They graduated from Stanford. Due to AI, they can’t find a job

A Stanford software engineering degree used to be a golden ticket. Artificial intelligence has devalued it to bronze, recent graduates say.

The elite students are shocked by the lack of job offers as they finish studies at what is often ranked as the top university in America.

When they were freshmen, ChatGPT hadn’t yet been released upon the world. Today, AI can code better than most humans.

Top tech companies just don’t need as many fresh graduates.

“Stanford computer science graduates are struggling to find entry-level jobs” with the most prominent tech brands, said Jan Liphardt, associate professor of bioengineering at Stanford University. “I think that’s crazy.”

Advertisement

While the rapidly advancing coding capabilities of generative AI have made experienced engineers more productive, they have also hobbled the job prospects of early-career software engineers.

Stanford students describe a suddenly skewed job market, where just a small slice of graduates — those considered “cracked engineers” who already have thick resumes building products and doing research — are getting the few good jobs, leaving everyone else to fight for scraps.

“There’s definitely a very dreary mood on campus,” said a recent computer science graduate who asked not to be named so they could speak freely. “People [who are] job hunting are very stressed out, and it’s very hard for them to actually secure jobs.”

The shake-up is being felt across California colleges, including UC Berkeley, USC and others. The job search has been even tougher for those with less prestigious degrees.

Eylul Akgul graduated last year with a degree in computer science from Loyola Marymount University. She wasn’t getting offers, so she went home to Turkey and got some experience at a startup. In May, she returned to the U.S., and still, she was “ghosted” by hundreds of employers.

Advertisement

“The industry for programmers is getting very oversaturated,” Akgul said.

The engineers’ most significant competitor is getting stronger by the day. When ChatGPT launched in 2022, it could only code for 30 seconds at a time. Today’s AI agents can code for hours, and do basic programming faster with fewer mistakes.

Data suggests that even though AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic are hiring many people, it is not offsetting the decline in hiring elsewhere. Employment for specific groups, such as early-career software developers between the ages of 22 and 25 has declined by nearly 20% from its peak in late 2022, according to a Stanford study.

It wasn’t just software engineers, but also customer service and accounting jobs that were highly exposed to competition from AI. The Stanford study estimated that entry-level hiring for AI-exposed jobs declined 13% relative to less-exposed jobs such as nursing.

In the Los Angeles region, another study estimated that close to 200,000 jobs are exposed. Around 40% of tasks done by call center workers, editors and personal finance experts could be automated and done by AI, according to an AI Exposure Index curated by resume builder MyPerfectResume.

Advertisement

Many tech startups and titans have not been shy about broadcasting that they are cutting back on hiring plans as AI allows them to do more programming with fewer people.

Anthropic Chief Executive Dario Amodei said that 70% to 90% of the code for some products at his company is written by his company’s AI, called Claude. In May, he predicted that AI’s capabilities will increase until close to 50% of all entry-level white-collar jobs might be wiped out in five years.

A common sentiment from hiring managers is that where they previously needed ten engineers, they now only need “two skilled engineers and one of these LLM-based agents,” which can be just as productive, said Nenad Medvidović, a computer science professor at the University of Southern California.

“We don’t need the junior developers anymore,” said Amr Awadallah, CEO of Vectara, a Palo Alto-based AI startup. “The AI now can code better than the average junior developer that comes out of the best schools out there.”

To be sure, AI is still a long way from causing the extinction of software engineers. As AI handles structured, repetitive tasks, human engineers’ jobs are shifting toward oversight.

Advertisement

Today’s AIs are powerful but “jagged,” meaning they can excel at certain math problems yet still fail basic logic tests and aren’t consistent. One study found that AI tools made experienced developers 19% slower at work, as they spent more time reviewing code and fixing errors.

Students should focus on learning how to manage and check the work of AI as well as getting experience working with it, said John David N. Dionisio, a computer science professor at LMU.

Stanford students say they are arriving at the job market and finding a split in the road; capable AI engineers can find jobs, but basic, old-school computer science jobs are disappearing.

As they hit this surprise speed bump, some students are lowering their standards and joining companies they wouldn’t have considered before. Some are creating their own startups. A large group of frustrated grads are deciding to continue their studies to beef up their resumes and add more skills needed to compete with AI.

“If you look at the enrollment numbers in the past two years, they’ve skyrocketed for people wanting to do a fifth-year master’s,” the Stanford graduate said. “It’s a whole other year, a whole other cycle to do recruiting. I would say, half of my friends are still on campus doing their fifth-year master’s.”

Advertisement

After four months of searching, LMU graduate Akgul finally landed a technical lead job at a software consultancy in Los Angeles. At her new job, she uses AI coding tools, but she feels like she has to do the work of three developers.

Universities and students will have to rethink their curricula and majors to ensure that their four years of study prepare them for a world with AI.

“That’s been a dramatic reversal from three years ago, when all of my undergraduate mentees found great jobs at the companies around us,” Stanford’s Liphardt said. “That has changed.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Disney+ to be part of a streaming bundle in Middle East

Published

on

Disney+ to be part of a streaming bundle in Middle East

Walt Disney Co. is expanding its presence in the Middle East, inking a deal with Saudi media conglomerate MBC Group and UAE firm Anghami to form a streaming bundle.

The bundle will allow customers in Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE to access a trio of streaming services — Disney+; MBC Group’s Shahid, which carries Arabic originals, live sports and events; and Anghami’s OSN+, which carries Arabic productions as well as Hollywood content.

The trio bundle costs AED89.99 per month, which is the price of two of the streaming services.

“This deal reflects a shared ambition between Disney+, Shahid and the MBC Group to shape the future of entertainment in the Middle East, a region that is seeing dynamic growth in the sector,” Karl Holmes, senior vice president and general manager of Disney+ EMEA, said in a statement.

Disney has already indicated it plans to grow in the Middle East.

Advertisement

Earlier this year, the company announced it would be building a new theme park in Abu Dhabi in partnership with local firm Miral, which would provide the capital, construction resources and operational oversight. Under the terms of the agreement, Disney would oversee the parks’ design, license its intellectual property and provide “operational expertise,” as well as collect a royalty.

Disney executives said at the time that the decision to build in the Middle East was a way to reach new audiences who were too far from the company’s current hubs in the U.S., Europe and Asia.

Continue Reading

Trending