Connect with us

Indiana

Tristen Newton struggles during summer league for Indiana Pacers, but should be able to be better in the future

Published

on

Tristen Newton struggles during summer league for Indiana Pacers, but should be able to be better in the future


LAS VEGAS — Tristen Newton had simple hopes for his first summer league: he wanted to leave an impression.

The rookie guard, who was drafted 49th overall by the Indiana Pacers in the 2024 NBA Draft, showed a little bit of everything during his college days. At UConn, where he won two national titles, he was a capable rebounder, strong passer, and effective scorer. At his best, he knocked down threes.

There was prevalent thinking that a player like him could be effective during summer league. And yet, despite his wide-ranging talent in college, it was actually totally different skills that popped for Newton during the tune-up games: his ability to draw fouls.

Newton took 28 free throws in Las Vegas, which topped the Pacers by far. Nobody else on the roster even reached 20. He was one of just two players to average more than 5.5 free throw attempts per game in under 22 minutes per night (Moses Brown of the LA Lakers was the other).

Advertisement

Indiana’s rookie point guard finished summer league with a free throw rate of 70%, far better than his collegiate figure of 46.9%. He made 89.3% of those foul shots, which kept his efficiency afloat.

Newton’s game stood out in that way. His second-best skill was his passing in traffic — he averaged 4.6 assists per game, good for second on the team, and quite a few of them came in tight spaces. As a point guard, that skill will be important.

“Tristen Newton, tremendous [growth] from game one to game five,” Pacers summer league head coach Jannero Pargo said. “Understanding our offense more, playing more confident. Being able to call plays and run our sets and be more comfortable out there.”

Unfortunately for Newton, some of his other skills from his NCAA days didn’t translate to the Vegas heat. In particular, his shot making was a disaster, and that held down his effectiveness.

The rookie guard shot 8/40 from the field across his five games, good for just 20%. He was 4/22 from long range (18.2%) and a not-much-better 4/18 (22.2%) on two-point looks. Shot distance and location didn’t matter — Newton struggled.

Advertisement

Taking 22 threes in five games in solid, and volume transfers more often from summer league than percentage. That’s the bright side for the young guard. But those field goals did not drop, and his ability to create good looks inside the arc didn’t pop.

Newton did grab 3.8 rebounds per game, a fine number for a guard, but he also had 2.8 turnovers per night. At times, he looked rushed and gave up the ball too quickly. He didn’t get all the way to the rim on his drives.

In those ways, Newton needed to be better. His defense was fine enough and he got his hands on a few steals, but the disappointing play finishing really hindered his effectiveness during summer league.

The Pacers liked that Newton was a more established player when they selected him in the draft. His play during summer league shouldn’t deter that thinking — if anything, the context around his summer outings should provide important perspective.

Newton played for a UConn team in 2022-23 that got up threes and had multiple players capable of setting the table for others. He performed well, and the team was great. In the following season, the Huskies dramatically changed their play style. There were fewer outside shots, and Newton’s playmaking burden grew.

Advertisement

He was extremely effective in both systems, which is why he was an All-Big East player and consensus All-American. He can adapt to any team when he gets time within a style and with a coaching staff.

In summer league, there is no time. Newton still hadn’t been drafted one month ago today. He went through a minicamp that was less than a week long, then was thrown into action. It didn’t always look great, though there were successes.

His free throw rate was extremely encouraging, but the shots didn’t fall. His rebounding was effective, yet the turnovers were concerning. Overall, the lack of shot making made the experience a negative.

But it is still reasonable to believe that Newton can be a capable do-it-all floor general when given time and space to figure out how his shots will come and what his teammates do well. He did it twice at UConn, and he can do it again in the NBA. He very quickly left an impression on his new teammates.

“Trsiten and Johnny [Furphy] are great guys,” Pacers rookie forward Enrique Freeman said. Newton didn’t get off to an awesome start, but he should have little trouble being more effective in future settings.

Advertisement



Source link

Indiana

Who has more 5-star recruits? Indiana football or Miami? Take a look

Published

on

Who has more 5-star recruits? Indiana football or Miami? Take a look


BLOOMINGTON — Indiana football’s roster is on more equal footing with Miami, even though the star rankings have meant little to the final results in this year’s CFP.

The No. 1 Hoosiers (15-0) beat Alabama and Oregon by a combined score of 94-25 despite having no former 5-star players in the starting lineup and just one former top 100 recruit.

The No. 10 Hurricanes (13-2) will have a pair of former 5-star recruits in their starting lineup but are only starting a total of three former top-100 prospects. It’s a sharp drop off in top talent from the likes of Alabama (14), Ohio State (10) and Oregon (eight).

Advertisement
Category Indiana Miami Oregon Ohio State Alabama
5-stars 0 2 2 3 9
4-stars 2 7 11 16 9
Top 100 recruits 1 3 8 10 14
2-stars or below 9 4 2 1 2

Indiana’s starting lineup still leads the way in overlooked recruits — it will start nine players that ranked 2-stars or below, including starting quarterback Fernando Mendoza — but Miami almost has more (four) than IU’s past three opponents combined (five).

The Hurricanes also has a more of a transfer laden starting lineup (11) than any of Indiana’s postseason opponents.

Here’s a position-by-position breakdown of the recruiting rankings for this year’s participants in the CFP championship game:

Re-live IU’s 2025 season

Advertisement

Indiana football’s quarterbacks vs. Miami

Position Indiana (Year) Rating (National rank) Miami (Year) Rating (National rank)
Quarterback Fernando Mendoza (2022) 2-stars (No. 2,149) Carson Beck (2020) 4-stars (No. 254)

Indiana football’s skill positions vs. Miami

Position Indiana (Year) Rating (National rank) Miami (Year) Rating (National rank)
Wide receiver Elijah Sarratt (2022) 0-stars (N/A) Malachi Toney (2025) 4-stars (No. 359)
Wide receiver Omar Cooper Jr. (2022) 4-stars (No. 299) Keelan Marion 2-stars (No. 3,390)
Wide receiver E.J. Williams Jr. (2020) 4-stars (No. 69) CJ Daniels (2020) 3-stars (No. 2,450)
Running back Roman Hemby (2021) 3-stars (No. 1,767) Mark Fletcher Jr. (2023) 4-stars (No. 149)
Tight end Riley Nowakowski (2020) 0-stars (N/A) Alex Bauman (2022) 3-stars (No. 1,770)

Indiana football’s offensive line vs Miami

Position Indiana (Year) Rating (National rank) Miami (Year) Rating (National rank)
Left tackle Carter Smith (2022) 3-stars (No. 730) Markel Bell (2022) N/A
Left guard Drew Evans (2022) 0-stars (N/A) Matthew McCoy (2022) 3-stars (No. 735)
Center Pat Coogan (2021) 3-stars (No. 613) James Brockermeyer (2021) 4-stars (No. 194)
Right guard Bray Lynch (2022) 3-stars (No. 1,033) Anez Cooper (2022) 3-stars (No. 1,149)
Right tackle Kahlil Benson (2020) 3-stars (No. 714) Francis Mauigoa (2023) 5-stars (No. 9)

Indiana football’s defensive line vs. Miami

Position Indiana (Year) Rating (National rank) Miami (Year) Rating (National rank)
Defensive tackle Mario Landino (2024) 3-stars (No. 2,398) Ahmad Moten Sr. (2022) 3-stars (No. 558)
Defensive tackle Tyrique Tucker (2022) 0-stars (N/A) Justin Scott (2024) 5-stars (No. 10)
Defensive end Mikail Kamara (2020) 0-stars (N/A) Rueben Bain (2023) 4-stars (No. 62)
Defensive end Stephen Daley (2022) 3-stars (No. 1,987) Akheem Mesidor (2020) 3-stars (No. 636)

Indiana football’s linebackers vs. Miami

Position Indiana (Year) Rating (National rank) Miami (Year) Rating (National rank)
Linebacker Aiden Fisher (2022) 0-stars (N/A) Wesley Bissainthe (2022) 4-stars (188)
Linebacker Rolijah Hardy (2023) 0-stars (N/A) Mohamed Toure (2019) 3-stars (No. 1,024)

Indiana football’s secondary vs. Miami

Position Indiana (Year) Rating (National rank) Miami (Year) Rating (National rank)
Cornerback D’Angelo Ponds (2023) 3-stars (No. 1,966) OJ Frederique Jr. (2024) 3-stars (No. 784)
Cornerback Jamari Sharpe (2022) 3-stars (No. 826) Ethan O’Conner (2023) 3-stars (No. 673)
Safety Louis Moore (2020) 0-stars (N/A) Zechariah Poyser (2023) N/A
Safety Amare Ferrell (2022) 3-stars (No. 578) Jakobe Thomas (2021) 3-stars (No. 2,048)
Rover Devan Boykin (2020) 3-stars (No. 833) Keionte Scott (2020) N/A

Michael Niziolek is the Indiana beat reporter for The Bloomington Herald-Times. You can follow him on X @michaelniziolek and read all his coverage by clicking here.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Indiana Hoosiers championship gear is here! Shop now at Fanatics

Published

on

Indiana Hoosiers championship gear is here! Shop now at Fanatics


The Indiana Hoosiers are heading to the College Football Playoff National Championship and they have barreled through some of the best teams in college football to get there.

The National Championship Game is set, with the Indiana Hoosiers facing the Miami Hurricanes at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, Fla. on Monday, Jan. 19. The matchup was officially locked in when Indiana took down the Oregon Ducks in the Chick-Fil-A Peach Bowl, 56-22. After the Hoosiers’ 38-3 win over Alabama, I would not want to be the team standing in their path.

But for Indiana fans, they could not have asked for a better season. You can celebrate all of those big moments, from the Big Ten championship and Fernando Mendoza’s Heisman win, to the Rose Bowl victory with unique sports prints. Then, cap it off with gear at Fanatics heading into the National Championship.

Advertisement

Here is a look at what to shop for the latest Hoosier’s championship gear at Fanatics:

Shop Indiana Hoosiers championship gear

Miami Hurricanes vs. Indiana Hoosiers College Football Playoff 2026 National Championship Game Matchup Total Showdown T-Shirt 

Indiana Hoosiers College Football Playoff 2026 National Championship Game Final Stop T-Shirt 

Miami Hurricanes vs. Indiana Hoosiers ’47 College Football Playoff 2026 National Championship Game Matchup Hitch Adjustable Hat 

Shop Indiana Hoosiers Chick-Fil-A Peach Bowl gear

Indiana Hoosiers College Football Playoff 2026 Peach Bowl Champions Locker Room T-Shirt

Indiana Hoosiers College Football Playoff 2026 Peach Bowl Champions Hometown Pride Hoodie

Indiana Hoosiers College Football Playoff 2026 Peach Bowl Champions Locker Room Rise Adjustable Hat



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

After Surviving Northwestern, MSU Basketball looks ahead to Indiana

Published

on

After Surviving Northwestern, MSU Basketball looks ahead to Indiana


Michigan State narrowly escaped with a home win against the now 8–7 Northwestern Wildcats. The Spartans struggled mightily in the first half, entering the break down seven points after scoring just 28 points. Michigan State committed eight turnovers in the opening 20 minutes and went 6-of-11 from the free-throw line.

Advertisement

After a sluggish start, the Spartans regrouped and took control in the second half. Michigan State shot 14-of-27 from the field after halftime, playing with better pace and ball movement.

Advertisement

Michigan State’s Cam Ward celebrates after a score and a Northwestern foul during the second half on Thursday, Jan. 8, 2026, at the Breslin Center in East Lansing. | Nick King/Lansing State Journal / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Jeremy Fears, who picked up two early fouls and began the game 0-of-4 from the field, responded with a strong second half. He finished the game shooting 4-of-7 from the field and a perfect 7-of-7 from the free-throw line.

Advertisement

Overall, Michigan State was far more composed in the second half against the Wildcats. However, with a matchup against Indiana looming, the Spartans will not be able to afford another slow start like the one they experienced against Northwestern.

Advertisement

Jan 5, 2026; East Lansing, Michigan, USA; Michigan State Spartans head coach Tom Izzo sends in a play against the Southern California Trojans during the first half at Jack Breslin Student Events Center. Mandatory Credit: Dale Young-Imagn Images | Dale Young-Imagn Images

Scouting Indiana

Advertisement

Indiana has undergone a similar offseason transformation to another Big Ten opponent Michigan State has already faced: the Iowa Hawkeyes. After parting ways with head coach Mike Woodson, the Hoosiers hired former West Virginia head coach Darian DeVries.

DeVries began his head coaching career at Drake, where he posted an impressive 150–55 record. Over his final four seasons with the Bulldogs, he led the program to 108 wins and three NCAA Tournament appearances.

Advertisement

Michigan State’s Jaxon Kohler, center, makes a shot against Northwestern during the second half on Thursday, Jan. 8, 2026, at the Breslin Center in East Lansing. | Nick King/Lansing State Journal / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Advertisement

DeVries also went 79–33 in Missouri Valley Conference play, captured three MVC titles, and guided Drake to six of the program’s 11 20-win seasons before leaving for West Virginia.

In his lone season with the Mountaineers, DeVries engineered a significant turnaround, improving West Virginia from a 10-win team to a 19-win team.

Now at Indiana, DeVries has continued that trend of rapid improvement. In Mike Woodson’s final season, the Hoosiers finished 19–13 and missed the NCAA Tournament. This season, Indiana has already reached 12 wins and appears firmly back in the postseason conversation.

Advertisement

Michigan State’s Jeremy Fears Jr., left, shoots as Northwestern’s Arrinten Page defends during the second half on Thursday, Jan. 8, 2026, at the Breslin Center in East Lansing. | Nick King/Lansing State Journal / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

The Hoosiers are led by senior guard Lamar Wilkerson, a transfer from Sam Houston. Wilkerson is averaging 19.5 points per game while shooting 46.2 percent from the field and 41.8 percent from three-point range.

Indiana has been strong on both ends of the floor. According to KenPom, the Hoosiers rank 30th nationally in offensive efficiency and 28th in defensive efficiency.

Advertisement

Michigan State’s Jeremy Fears Jr., left, slaps hands with Coen Carr, right, after Carr’s dunk against Northwestern during the second half on Thursday, Jan. 8, 2026, at the Breslin Center in East Lansing. | Nick King/Lansing State Journal / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

As Michigan State prepares to face Indiana, the Spartans will need to clean up their first-half execution to keep pace with one of the Big Ten’s more balanced teams. Indiana’s efficiency on both ends of the court, combined with DeVries’ proven ability to elevate programs quickly, makes this a difficult matchup. For Michigan State, a complete 40-minute performance will be essential if it hopes to build momentum in conference play.

Keep up with all our content when you follow the official Spartan Nation page on Facebook, Spartan Nation, WHEN YOU CLICK RIGHT HERE, and be sure to share your thoughts on Cam Ward when you join our community group, Go Green Go White, WHEN YOU CLICK RIGHT HERE. Don’t forget to give us a follow on X @MSUSpartansOnSI as well.

Never again miss one major story related to your beloved Spartans when you sign up for our 100% FREE newsletter that comes straight to your email with the latest news. SIGN UP HERE NOW

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending