Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Movie review: Késárí is an intriguing story with a poor execution

Published

on

Movie review: Késárí is an intriguing story with a poor execution

“Késárí: The King” is a captivating Nigerian film that embarks on a mystical journey through historical and cultural references, interweaving them into a unique narrative fabric. The movie’s storyline, set in a traditional African context, combines elements of mythology, folklore, and contemporary storytelling, creating an engaging and thought-provoking experience.

You’ll begin “Késárí: The King” reminiscing on other ancient Yoruba-themed stories and the aesthetic of the stories. But, it progresses from there into contemporary society.

Originally released in August 2023 to the theatres, the movie was recently debuted on popular streaming platform, Netflix. It was directed by Tope Adebayo and Ibrahim Yekini, who doubles as Kesari

Movie review: Késárí: The King

Plot – “Késárí: The King”

The story begins with Kesari as a god figure laying waste to a band of thieves terrorising the world. 

The plot centres on Kesari, (Ifadola – his earthly name), whose transformation from a god to a human and back again forms the crux of the narrative. This concept, while intriguing, is not executed with enough clarity to be fully impactful. 

As the narrative progresses, his journey into humanity and eventual return to his divine origins are meant to signify a profound transformation. 

Advertisement

However, the transitions in his character arc are abrupt and confusing, leaving viewers puzzled about the rationale and implications of his changes. A more gradual and detailed exploration of this transformation would have strengthened the story.

In his transformation back to a god in contemporary society, Kesari becomes a notorious robber, who uses the proceeds to help the poor. But, that is hardly cleared out in the story and we only take the hint home, not the action. 

The writer also introduces a mysterious book held by one 200-year-old baba. This book supposedly contains crucial knowledge about Kesari’s journey and destiny, but its contents and significance remain unexplored. 

The police officer’s role in using this book to send Kesari back to the spirit world adds another layer of mystery that is not adequately addressed, creating a narrative gap.

The initial references to familiar stories like the Three Wise Men and Robin Hood serve to ground the story in a relatable context. These references are intriguing but are not seamlessly woven into the main plot. Instead, they feel more like decorative elements rather than integral parts of the narrative.

Advertisement
Késárí: The KingKésárí: The King

These affect the story’s cohesion.

No doubt, the film’s narrative structure is ambitious, aiming to weave together multiple layers of myth, history, and personal transformation. However, the pacing and structure occasionally falter, leading to disruptions in story progression.

A particularly jarring element in the narrative is the portrayal of law enforcement. The scene where policemen kill an unarmed criminal raises several questions. Is that a portrayal of what is normal for the police force?

Read also: A story rough around the edges: A review of “Afamefuna”

Characterisation

The characterisation in “Késárí: The King” is one of its weaker aspects. 

Kesari/Ifadola

Kesari, the main character, is depicted as a complex character with a dual nature—both divine and human. While his internal and external conflicts are central to the story, the abruptness of his transformations makes it hard for viewers to connect with his journey.

Advertisement

The depth and nuances of his character are hinted at but not fully explored.

Again, why must Kesari undergo a human existence only to return as a deity? This disruption in the story progression could have been better explained to enhance the narrative coherence.

Amoke Ade

Amoke Ade, Kesari’s love interest, is portrayed as a calming influence on him, especially during his moments of rage. 

However, her character is underdeveloped, and her role in Kesari’s transformation is not clearly defined. This lack of development diminishes the potential impact of her character on the overall story.

Most of what we see is Kesari almost killing three men because they had offended her, and her reappearance in his life as a Police informant thereafter. 

The police officer 

The police officer, who plays a crucial role in the climax, is another character that lacks depth. 

Advertisement

His actions, particularly using an unexplained book to send Kesari back to the spirit world, seem arbitrary and lack sufficient background or motivation. 

He’s hardworking and committed to his job, quite alright, but we only see that through the bold motivational speeches and conversations when he meets his team. 

The 200-year-old mystery man

Another intriguing character is the 200-year-old man, the wise elder who possesses a significant book on Kesari. Baba’s role is somewhat ambiguous:

Who is Baba? Is he another god, a spiritual guide, or merely an aged scholar with access to ancient wisdom? His extensive knowledge of Kesari’s destiny and the spiritual world adds an element of mystery, but his character remains underdeveloped.

Movie review: Késárí: The KingMovie review: Késárí: The King

The in-depth development of secondary characters, like the Baba, would have added depth to the narrative. Understanding their motivations and roles more clearly would have enriched the story.

As we talk about the old man, let’s not forget the significance of the book – a key plot device.

Advertisement

It presumably contains prophecies or knowledge about Kesari’s journey and mission. However, the contents and significance of this book are not fully explored, leaving viewers to speculate about its true importance. What we know is that it was Kesari’s doom – or forced return to the spiritual realm. 

It didn’t even seem like the police officer had any control even after opening the book. 

Picture quality

The picture quality of “Késárí: The King” is one of its strong points. The visuals are clear, and the use of vibrant colours adds to the film’s aesthetic appeal. 

The traditional African settings are beautifully captured, creating an immersive experience for the viewers. However, despite the good picture quality, the cinematography lacks substance. The camera work does not always enhance the storytelling, and at times, it feels static and uninspired.

Visual effects

The special effects in the film are reminiscent of techniques used around 1992, which makes them feel outdated. 

Advertisement

This is particularly evident in scenes involving supernatural elements. The effects fail to convincingly portray the intended mysticism and otherworldliness, often breaking the immersion for the viewers. 

For instance, sequences that require a depiction of divine intervention or other supernatural occurrences come across as unconvincing due to the lacklustre effects. If you see the hanging gold head of Kesari, you’d wonder why exactly it had to hang in the first place.

Transitions

The transitions in “Késárí: The King” are a significant area of concern. The shifts between different scenes and narrative arcs are often abrupt and jarring, disrupting the flow of the story. 

The sound effects, which should complement these transitions, are sometimes out of sync with the visuals, further detracting from the viewing experience. 

A more thoughtful approach to scene transitions and sound design would have greatly enhanced the narrative flow and viewer engagement.

Advertisement

Harry Potter, which comes decades before this, did a better job. Let’s not, however, forget funding and infrastructure.

Verdict 

In summary, “Késárí: The King” is a film with commendable ambition and potential but falls short in execution. 

Its strong picture quality and thematic depth are overshadowed by its shortcomings in narrative coherence, character development, and special effects. The plot, though intriguing in concept, is marred by unexplained transformations and underdeveloped characters. 

The film’s outdated effects and poor transitions further detract from its overall impact. 

With more cohesive storytelling, better character development, and updated effects, future Nollywood films could better capture and sustain audience interest, pushing the boundaries of storytelling and cinematic experience.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Controversy Surrounds ‘The Raja Saab’ as Makers Allegedly Offer Money for Positive Reviews | – The Times of India

Published

on

Controversy Surrounds ‘The Raja Saab’ as Makers Allegedly Offer Money for Positive Reviews | – The Times of India
Prabhas’s ‘The Raja Saab’ has hit theaters, but early social media reactions are mixed to negative. A netizen claims the film’s team offered him ₹14,000 to delete his critical review and post a positive one instead. The authenticity of this claim remains unverified, while fans continue to share their varied opinions online.

Prabhas-starrer ‘The Raja Saab’ is currently running in theaters; the much-awaited film was released today. The early reviews of the Maruthi-directed film have been receiving mixed to negative reviews on social media. However, a netizen has claimed that the makers of the film offered him money to delete his negative review.

Netizen alleges bribe by the makers

On Friday morning, an X user named @BS__unfiltered posted a screenshot online. He said he received a message from the official account of ‘The Raja Saab’ after posting his review. According to him, the film’s team offered him Rs 14,000. They reportedly asked him to post a positive review of the movie instead. Sharing the screenshot, the user wrote, “What the hell mannnnn!!!! They are offering me money to delete this!!! Nahi hoga delete #TheRajaSaab #Prabhas.” However, the screenshot shared by the user is in question for its authenticity and is not verified. At this time, it is not clear if the message was real or AI-generated. The claim is still unconfirmed.See More: The Raja Saab: Movie Review and Release Live Updates: Prabhas’ film to open big at the box office

Fans share their opinions online

Fans and netizens have been active on social media, sharing their opinions about the film. While some enjoyed it, many expressed disappointment. Another internet user wrote, “A horror-fantasy with a good idea but weak execution. Prabhas gives an energetic & comical performance, & the face-off with Sanjay Dutt is the main highlight. The palace setting is interesting at first, but the messy screenplay, dragged 2nd half, uneven VFX, & weak emotional payoff reduce the impact. @MusicThaman’s music & sounding are one of the positives. From the end of the first half, the story becomes slightly interesting. There are 3 songs featuring Prabhas & @AgerwalNidhhi. Nidhhi has performed well. Some scenes feel unintentionally funny, & the climax fails to impress. Overall, a one-time watch at best. This film gives a lead for The Raja Saab Circus—1935 (Part 2), where we may see Prabhas vs. Prabhas.”

Advertisement

About ‘The Raja Saab’

‘The Raja Saab’ is directed and written by Maruthi. The film stars Prabhas in the lead role. The cast also includes Malavika Mohanan, Nidhhi Agerwal, Riddhi Kumar, Sanjay Dutt, and Boman Irani.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Greenland 2: Migration’ Review: Gerard Butler in a Post-Apocalyptic Sequel That’s Exactly What You Expect

Published

on

‘Greenland 2: Migration’ Review: Gerard Butler in a Post-Apocalyptic Sequel That’s Exactly What You Expect

Desperate migrants are forced to leave Greenland after a malevolent force makes their island uninhabitable. No, it’s not tomorrow’s headline about Donald Trump, but rather the sequel to Ric Roman Waugh’s 2020 post-apocalyptic survival thriller. That film starring Gerard Butler and Morena Baccarin had the misfortune of opening during the pandemic and going straight to VOD. Greenland 2: Migration (now there’s a catchy title) has the benefit of opening in theaters, but it truly feels like an unnecessary follow-up. After all, how many travails can one poor family take?

That family consists of John Garrity (Butler), whose structural engineering skills designated him a governmental candidate for survival in the wake of an interstellar comet dubbed “Clarke” wreaking worldwide destruction; his wife Allison (Baccarin); and their son Nathan (now played by Roman Griffin Davis). At the end of the first film, the clan had endured numerous life-threatening crises as they made their way to the underground bunker in Greenland where survivors will attempt to make a new life.

Greenland 2: Migration

The Bottom Line

It’s the end of the world as we know it…again.

Advertisement

Release date: Friday, January 9
Cast: Gerard Butler, Morena Baccarin, Roman Griffin Davis, Amber Rose Revah, Sophie Thompson, Trond Fausa Aurvag, William Abadie
Director: Ric Roman Waugh
Screenwriters: Mitchell LaFortune, Chris Sparling

Rated PG-13,
1 hour 38 minutes

Five years later, things aren’t going so well. Fragments of the comet continue to rain down on the planet, causing catastrophic destruction. The contaminated air prevents people from going outside, and resources are becoming increasingly scarce. But there are some plus sides, such as the bunker’s inhabitants still being able to dance to yacht rock.

When their safe haven in Greenland is destroyed, the Garritys, along with a few other survivors, are forced to flee. Their destination is France, where there are rumors of an oasis at the comet’s original crash site. And at the very least, the food is bound to be better.

Advertisement

It’s a perilous journey, but anyone who saw the first film knows what to expect. The Garritys, along with the bunker’s Dr. Casey (Amber Rose Revah), run into some very bad people, undergoing a series of life-threatening trials and tribulations.

Unfortunately, while the thriller mechanics are reasonably well orchestrated by director Waugh (Angel Has Fallen, Kandahar) in his fourth collaboration with Butler, Greenland 2: Migration feels as redundant as its title. While the first film featured a relatively original premise and some genuine emotional dynamics in its suspenseful situations, this one just feels rote. And while it’s made clear that the crisis has resulted in people resorting to cutthroat, deadly means to ensure their survival, the Garritys have it relatively easy. All John has to do is adopt a puppy-dog look, put a pleading tone in his voice, beg for his family’s help, and people inevitably comply.

To be fair, the film contains some genuinely arresting scenes, including one set in a practically submerged Liverpool and another in a dried-up English Channel. The latter provides the opportunity for a harrowing sequence in which the family is forced to cross a giant ravine on a treacherously fragile rope ladder.

Butler remains a sturdy screen presence, his Everyman quality lending gravitas to his character. Baccarin, whose character serves as the story’s moral conscience (early in the proceedings she spearheads a fight to open the shelter to more refugees despite the lack of resources, delivering a not-so-subtle message), more than matches his impact. William Abadie (of Emily in Paris) also makes a strong impression as a Frenchman who briefly takes the family in and begs them to take his daughter Camille (Nelia Valery de Costa) along with them.

Resembling the sort of B-movie fantasy adventure, with serviceable but unremarkable special effects, that used to populate multiplexes in the early ‘70s, Greenland 2: Migration is adequate January filler programming. The only thing it’s missing is dinosaurs.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: A real-life ’70s hostage drama crackles in Gus Van Sant’s ‘Dead Man’s Wire’

Published

on

Movie Review: A real-life ’70s hostage drama crackles in Gus Van Sant’s ‘Dead Man’s Wire’

It plays a little loose with facts but the righteous rage of “Dog Day Afternoon” is present enough in Gus Van Sant’s “Dead Man’s Wire,” a based-on-a-true-tale hostage thriller that’s as deeply 1970s as it is contemporary.

In February 1977, Tony Kiritsis walked into the Meridian Mortgage Company in downtown Indianapolis and took one of its executives, Dick Hall, hostage. Kiritsis held a sawed-off shotgun to the back of Hall’s head and draped a wire around his neck that connected to the gun. If he moved too much, he would die.

The subsequent standoff moved to Kiritsis’ apartment and eventually concluded in a live televised news conference. The whole ordeal received some renewed attention in a 2022 podcast dramatization starring Jon Hamm.

But in “Dead Man’s Wire,” starring Bill Skarsgård as Kiritsis, these events are vividly brought to life by Van Sant. It’s been seven years since Van Sant directed, following 2018’s “Don’t Worry, He Won’t Get Far on Foot,” and one of the prevailing takeaways of his new film is that that’s too long of a break for a filmmaker of Van Sant’s caliber.

Working from a script by Austin Kolodney, the filmmaker of “My Own Private Idaho” and “Good Will Hunting” turns “Dead Man’s Wire” into not a period-piece time capsule but a bracingly relevant drama of outrage and inequality. Tony feels aggrieved by his mortgage company over a land deal the bank, he claims, blocked. We’re never given many specifics, but at the same time, there’s little doubt in “Dead Man’s Wire” that Tony’s cause is just. His means might be desperate and abhorrent, but the movie is very definitely on his side.

Advertisement

That’s owed significantly to Skarsgård, who gives one of his finest and least adorned performances. While best known for films like “It,” “The Crow” and “Nosferatu,” here Skarsgård has little more than some green polyester and a very ’70s mustache to alter his looks. The straightforward, jittery intensity of his performance propels “Dead Man’s Wire.”

Yet Van Sant’s film aspires to be a larger ensemble drama, which it only partially succeeds at. Tony’s plight is far from a solitary one, as numerous threads suggest in Kolodney’s fast-paced script. First and foremost is Colman Domingo as a local DJ named Fred Temple. (If ever there were an actor suited, with a smooth baritone, to play a ’70s radio DJ, it’s Domingo.) Tony, a fan, calls Fred to air his demands. But it’s not just a media outlet for him. Fred touts himself as “the voice of the people.”

Something similar could be said of Tony, who rapidly emerges as a kind of folk hero. As much as he tortures his hostage (a very good Dacre Montgomery), he’s kind to the police officers surrounding him. And as he and Dick spend more time together, Dick emerges as a kind of victim, himself. It’s his father’s bank, and when Tony gets M.L. Hall (Al Pacino) on the phone, he sounds painfully insensitive, sooner ready to sacrifice his son than acknowledge any wrongdoing.

Pacino’s presence in “Dead Man’s Wire” is a nod to “Dog Day Afternoon,” a movie that may be far better — but, then again, that’s true of most films in comparison to Sidney Lumet’s unsurpassed 1975 classic. Still, Van Sant’s film bears some of the same rage and disillusionment with the meatgrinder of capitalism as “Dog Day.”

There’s also a telling, if not entirely successful subplot of a local TV news reporter (Myha’la) struggling against stereotypes. Even when she gets the goods on the unspooling news story, the way her producer says to “chop it up” and put it on air makes it clear: Whatever Tony is rebelling against, it’s him, not his plight, that will be served up on a prime-time plate.

Advertisement

It doesn’t take recent similar cases of national fascination, such as Luigi Mangione, charged with killing a healthcare executive, to see contemporary echoes of Kiritsis’ tale. The real story is more complicated and less metaphor-ready, of course, than the movie, which detracts some from the film’s gritty sense of verisimilitude. Staying closer to the truth might have produced a more dynamic movie.

But “Dead Man’s Wire” still works. In the film, Tony’s demands are $5 million and an apology. It’s clear the latter means more to him than the money. The tragedy in “Dead Man’s Wire” is just how elusive “I’m sorry” can be.

“Dead Man’s Wire,” a Row K Entertainment release, is rated R for language throughout. Running time: 105 minutes. Three stars out of four.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending