Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Movie review: Késárí is an intriguing story with a poor execution

Published

on

Movie review: Késárí is an intriguing story with a poor execution

“Késárí: The King” is a captivating Nigerian film that embarks on a mystical journey through historical and cultural references, interweaving them into a unique narrative fabric. The movie’s storyline, set in a traditional African context, combines elements of mythology, folklore, and contemporary storytelling, creating an engaging and thought-provoking experience.

You’ll begin “Késárí: The King” reminiscing on other ancient Yoruba-themed stories and the aesthetic of the stories. But, it progresses from there into contemporary society.

Originally released in August 2023 to the theatres, the movie was recently debuted on popular streaming platform, Netflix. It was directed by Tope Adebayo and Ibrahim Yekini, who doubles as Kesari

Movie review: Késárí: The King

Plot – “Késárí: The King”

The story begins with Kesari as a god figure laying waste to a band of thieves terrorising the world. 

The plot centres on Kesari, (Ifadola – his earthly name), whose transformation from a god to a human and back again forms the crux of the narrative. This concept, while intriguing, is not executed with enough clarity to be fully impactful. 

As the narrative progresses, his journey into humanity and eventual return to his divine origins are meant to signify a profound transformation. 

Advertisement

However, the transitions in his character arc are abrupt and confusing, leaving viewers puzzled about the rationale and implications of his changes. A more gradual and detailed exploration of this transformation would have strengthened the story.

In his transformation back to a god in contemporary society, Kesari becomes a notorious robber, who uses the proceeds to help the poor. But, that is hardly cleared out in the story and we only take the hint home, not the action. 

The writer also introduces a mysterious book held by one 200-year-old baba. This book supposedly contains crucial knowledge about Kesari’s journey and destiny, but its contents and significance remain unexplored. 

The police officer’s role in using this book to send Kesari back to the spirit world adds another layer of mystery that is not adequately addressed, creating a narrative gap.

The initial references to familiar stories like the Three Wise Men and Robin Hood serve to ground the story in a relatable context. These references are intriguing but are not seamlessly woven into the main plot. Instead, they feel more like decorative elements rather than integral parts of the narrative.

Advertisement
Késárí: The KingKésárí: The King

These affect the story’s cohesion.

No doubt, the film’s narrative structure is ambitious, aiming to weave together multiple layers of myth, history, and personal transformation. However, the pacing and structure occasionally falter, leading to disruptions in story progression.

A particularly jarring element in the narrative is the portrayal of law enforcement. The scene where policemen kill an unarmed criminal raises several questions. Is that a portrayal of what is normal for the police force?

Read also: A story rough around the edges: A review of “Afamefuna”

Characterisation

The characterisation in “Késárí: The King” is one of its weaker aspects. 

Kesari/Ifadola

Kesari, the main character, is depicted as a complex character with a dual nature—both divine and human. While his internal and external conflicts are central to the story, the abruptness of his transformations makes it hard for viewers to connect with his journey.

Advertisement

The depth and nuances of his character are hinted at but not fully explored.

Again, why must Kesari undergo a human existence only to return as a deity? This disruption in the story progression could have been better explained to enhance the narrative coherence.

Amoke Ade

Amoke Ade, Kesari’s love interest, is portrayed as a calming influence on him, especially during his moments of rage. 

However, her character is underdeveloped, and her role in Kesari’s transformation is not clearly defined. This lack of development diminishes the potential impact of her character on the overall story.

Most of what we see is Kesari almost killing three men because they had offended her, and her reappearance in his life as a Police informant thereafter. 

The police officer 

The police officer, who plays a crucial role in the climax, is another character that lacks depth. 

Advertisement

His actions, particularly using an unexplained book to send Kesari back to the spirit world, seem arbitrary and lack sufficient background or motivation. 

He’s hardworking and committed to his job, quite alright, but we only see that through the bold motivational speeches and conversations when he meets his team. 

The 200-year-old mystery man

Another intriguing character is the 200-year-old man, the wise elder who possesses a significant book on Kesari. Baba’s role is somewhat ambiguous:

Who is Baba? Is he another god, a spiritual guide, or merely an aged scholar with access to ancient wisdom? His extensive knowledge of Kesari’s destiny and the spiritual world adds an element of mystery, but his character remains underdeveloped.

Movie review: Késárí: The KingMovie review: Késárí: The King

The in-depth development of secondary characters, like the Baba, would have added depth to the narrative. Understanding their motivations and roles more clearly would have enriched the story.

As we talk about the old man, let’s not forget the significance of the book – a key plot device.

Advertisement

It presumably contains prophecies or knowledge about Kesari’s journey and mission. However, the contents and significance of this book are not fully explored, leaving viewers to speculate about its true importance. What we know is that it was Kesari’s doom – or forced return to the spiritual realm. 

It didn’t even seem like the police officer had any control even after opening the book. 

Picture quality

The picture quality of “Késárí: The King” is one of its strong points. The visuals are clear, and the use of vibrant colours adds to the film’s aesthetic appeal. 

The traditional African settings are beautifully captured, creating an immersive experience for the viewers. However, despite the good picture quality, the cinematography lacks substance. The camera work does not always enhance the storytelling, and at times, it feels static and uninspired.

Visual effects

The special effects in the film are reminiscent of techniques used around 1992, which makes them feel outdated. 

Advertisement

This is particularly evident in scenes involving supernatural elements. The effects fail to convincingly portray the intended mysticism and otherworldliness, often breaking the immersion for the viewers. 

For instance, sequences that require a depiction of divine intervention or other supernatural occurrences come across as unconvincing due to the lacklustre effects. If you see the hanging gold head of Kesari, you’d wonder why exactly it had to hang in the first place.

Transitions

The transitions in “Késárí: The King” are a significant area of concern. The shifts between different scenes and narrative arcs are often abrupt and jarring, disrupting the flow of the story. 

The sound effects, which should complement these transitions, are sometimes out of sync with the visuals, further detracting from the viewing experience. 

A more thoughtful approach to scene transitions and sound design would have greatly enhanced the narrative flow and viewer engagement.

Advertisement

Harry Potter, which comes decades before this, did a better job. Let’s not, however, forget funding and infrastructure.

Verdict 

In summary, “Késárí: The King” is a film with commendable ambition and potential but falls short in execution. 

Its strong picture quality and thematic depth are overshadowed by its shortcomings in narrative coherence, character development, and special effects. The plot, though intriguing in concept, is marred by unexplained transformations and underdeveloped characters. 

The film’s outdated effects and poor transitions further detract from its overall impact. 

With more cohesive storytelling, better character development, and updated effects, future Nollywood films could better capture and sustain audience interest, pushing the boundaries of storytelling and cinematic experience.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Avedon’ Review: Ron Howard’s Admiring Profile of Groundbreaking Photographer Richard Avedon Embraces His Genius, Flair and Mystery

Published

on

‘Avedon’ Review: Ron Howard’s Admiring Profile of Groundbreaking Photographer Richard Avedon Embraces His Genius, Flair and Mystery

For Richard Avedon, as with most significant artists, work and life were inseparable. When the photographer died in 2004, at 81, he was on the road, mid-project — “with his boots on,” in the words of Lauren Hutton, one of the many beautiful people he helped to immortalize over a 60-year career. Hutton and the two dozen or so other interviewees in Ron Howard’s admiring documentary make it clear how much affection the New York native inspired while reinventing fashion photography and putting his iconoclastic stamp on fine-art portraiture.

The profile Avedon paints is that of a relentless seeker and high-flying achiever, and a deliciously unapologetic contrarian. How can you not adore an image-maker who says, “Beautiful lighting I always find offensive,” and, regarding little kids as potential photographic subjects: “I find them intensely boring.” Avedon’s interest in the grown-up human face, in what it conceals and reveals, was his lifelong project, one that he pursued within circles of rarefied fame, on the backroads of the American West, and in a poignant late-in-life connection with his father.

Avedon

The Bottom Line

A solid mix of glitz and angst.

Advertisement

Venue: Cannes Film Festival (Special Screenings)
Director: Ron Howard

1 hour 44 minutes

As confrontational as his images could be, the camera was Avedon’s way of experiencing the world, a way of seeking truth through invention. Howard, whose previous doc subjects include Jim Henson and Luciano Pavarotti, and whose fiction movies are designed more to engage rather than to confront, seems particularly inspired here by Avedon’s auteur approach to still photography — it was a narrative impulse, not a documentary one, that shaped his vision, a drive to create moments and mise-en-scènes for the camera.

Avedon built his career at magazines in an era when magazines mattered. He was only 21 when he joined Harper’s Bazaar, where he stayed for 20 years, leaving to follow fashion editor Diana Vreeland to Vogue, where he stayed even longer. And when Tina Brown took the helm at The New Yorker and overturned its age-old no-photos policy, she hired Avedon as its first staff photographer.

Advertisement

When Harper’s sent him to Paris in 1947 with an edict to summon some of the battered capital’s prewar glamour, he turned to movies for inspiration and conjured visions of romantic fantasy amid the ruins. It was his first significant assignment, and a turning point for fashion photography. The doc emphasizes how, at a Dior show, the images he captured of the designer’s voluminous skirts mid-twirl expressed an ecstatic moment after years of wartime rationing. “People were weeping,” recalls Avedon, a vivid presence in the doc thanks to a strong selection of archival material.

The kinetic energy of those shots would become a defining element of his approach. Injecting movement and a theatrical edge into fashion photography, he lifted it out of the era of posed mannequins. To get models into the spirit of his concepts, he often leapt and danced alongside them. It’s no wonder that in Funny Face, the romantic musical loosely inspired by his career and first marriage, Fred Astaire played the photographer. Eventually Avedon shifted to a large-format camera, an 8×10, that allowed him to interact with his subjects directly, rather than through a viewfinder. There would be more scripted and carefully choreographed moments in his TV spots for Calvin Klein jeans and Obsession, collaborations with the writer Doon Arbus (daughter of Diane and Allan Arbus) that took chances (and which, for some viewers, are inseparable from memorable spoofs on SNL).

Fashion and advertising were mainstays, but he also became a notable portraitist. Positioning his subjects against a plain white background, he removed flattery from the equation. It was an artist-subject relationship in which he held all the power, and he didn’t pretend otherwise; on that point, Brown offers a trenchant anecdote. Remarkably, even though his refusal to sugarcoat was well established — not least by his notorious photo of the Daughters of the American Revolution — an Avedon portrait carried such cachet that establishment figures including the Reagans, Henry Kissinger and George H.W. Bush all submitted themselves to his crosshairs.

The film suggests that a moral imperative was as essential to Avedon’s work as his unconventional aesthetic vocabulary. He threatened to sever his contract with Harper’s when the magazine didn’t want to publish his photos of China Machado, and he prevailed: In 1959, she became the first model of color to appear in the editorial pages of a major American fashion magazine. Howard looks beyond the catwalks and salons to Avedon’s portraits of wartime Saigon, Civil Rights leaders and patients at Bellevue, many of those images collected in Nothing Personal, the book he did with James Baldwin, a friend from high school. A superb clip from a D.A. Pennebaker short of the book launch encapsulates the painfully awkward disconnect between the artist and the corporate media contingent. Most surprising, though, is how hard Avedon took it when the book was lambasted by critics. A later book, In the American West, would also meet harsh criticism; Avedon was, in the eyes of some, a condescending elitist.

Howard’s film is a celebration of a complicated man. It acknowledges Avedon’s naysayers, as well as his struggles and doubts, but this is very much an official story, made in association with the Richard Avedon Foundation, and steering clear of the disputed 2017 biography by Avedon’s business partner. The commentary, whether from models (Hutton, Isabella Rossellini, Twiggy Lawson, Penelope Tree, Beverly Johnson) or writers (Adam Gopnik, John Lahr, Hilton Als) or Avedon’s son, John, can be gushing, but it’s always perceptive.

Advertisement

The connection he sought with his subjects wasn’t about star worship but the instant when the ego lets down its guard, yet at the same time he was more interested in what he called “the marriage of the imagination and the reality” than straight documentation. Without putting too fine a point on it, Avedon links those twinned yet seemingly contradictory impulses to certain formative experiences. There was the devastation of extreme mental illness for Avedon’s sister and his second wife. There was the pretense of happiness in his childhood home in Depression-era New York (the city is captured in terrifically evocative clips). He recalls, discerning and exasperated, the staged domestic harmony — “the borrowed dogs!” — in family photos.

Avedon doesn’t aim to unsettle, like Avedon himself did, but neither does it tie things up neatly. There’s nothing simple or reductive about the emotional throughlines the documentary traces. It embraces the complexities of a man who turned artifice into a kind of superpower, whether he was dreaming up scenarios for fashion spreads or confronting an America as far removed from haute couture Manhattan as you could get.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Hokum’ movie review: Damian McCarthy’s nasty little ghost story is undone by its own explanations 

Published

on

‘Hokum’ movie review: Damian McCarthy’s nasty little ghost story is undone by its own explanations 

A stil from ‘Hokum’
| Photo Credit: NEON

For those of you already familiar with Damian McCarthy’s work, the Irish filmmaker has spent the past few years turning cramped Irish spaces into elaborate, nerve-racking machines for dread. His 2020 debut, Caveat, trapped us inside a decaying rural house with a chained protagonist and a grotesque toy rabbit, while 2024’s Oddity transformed an isolated farmhouse into a relay system for jump scares built from negative space and the sound of somebody knocking at the wrong moment. His latest, Hokum, pushes that approach into a larger setting without sacrificing the intimate unpleasantness that makes his work so effective. 

The film takes place almost entirely inside the Bilberry Woods Hotel, a fading property buried in the Irish countryside where the final few guests arrive for a Halloween celebration. At the same time, staff members quietly prepare to shut the building down for winter. Into this atmosphere walks Ohm Bauman, played by Adam Scott, an American novelist carrying two urns containing his parents’ ashes and a personality abrasive enough to make even the resident ghouls feel hospitable.

Hokum (English)

Director: Damian McCarthy

Cast: Adam Scott, Peter Coonan, David Wilmot, Florence Ordesh, Michael Patric, Will O’Connell, Brendan Conroy, Austin Amelio

Runtime: 107 minutes

Advertisement

Storyline: When novelist Ohm Bauman retreats to a remote inn to scatter his parents’ ashes, he’s consumed by tales of a witch that haunts the honeymoon suite

McCarthy introduces Ohm through his work. The opening sequence shows him writing the conclusion to a historical adventure novel about a conquistador stranded in the desert with a dying child, and the scene initially appears disconnected from the main story until the camera pulls back to reveal that the entire episode exists inside Ohm’s manuscript.

This intro establishes the emotional logic driving the film. Ohm writes stories where people wander toward death because he has spent most of his adult life emotionally entombed inside the loss of his parents, who died shortly after honeymooning at the same Irish hotel he now visits. McCarthy avoids turning this into a tidy psychological diagnosis and attempts to reveal the damage through behaviour — Ohm humiliates a bellhop named Alby by heating a spoon over an open flame and pressing it against the young man’s hand after Alby asks him to read an aspiring manuscript.

That ugliness becomes central to Scott’s performance. Hokum strips away the comic cushioning that often softens his cynicism, especially in his recent Severance escapades. Scott keeps Ohm emotionally rigid even as the character begins to unravel inside the hotel’s sealed honeymoon suite, and the refusal to chase sympathy lends the film a sourness that works in its favour. When Ohm eventually risks himself to search for the hotel bartender Fiona, the motivation grows from guilt and loneliness over his botched suicide attempt. Fiona disappears after warning him about the suite’s resident witch, a local legend the hotel staff accepts with weary practicality, and her absence pushes Ohm deeper into the building’s sinister secrets.

A stil from ‘Hokum’

A stil from ‘Hokum’
| Photo Credit:
NEON

Cinematographer Colm Hogan lights the hotel with weak lamps, muddy greens, and heavy shadows that preserve spatial clarity even when characters crawl through near-total darkness. Production designer Til Frohlich fills the honeymoon suite with damp wallpaper, antique furniture, and cramped architectural dead ends that make it feel physically hostile before anything malicious even appears. McCarthy then uses sound with vicious precision, as ringing bells ring, creaking floorboards, and a mutated, uncanny-valley children’s TV program begin flooding the ominous silence.

The film loses some momentum once McCarthy begins unpacking the mystery behind Fiona’s disappearance and the crimes attached to the hotel’s past. Several supporting characters remain thinly drawn, particularly the hotel management, and the screenplay occasionally mistakes withholding information for complexity. The final stretch also leans too heavily on explanatory reveals and heightened confrontations, with the climactic encounter involving the witch pushing the film toward bluntness when the earlier sections had earned their power through suggestion alone.

Advertisement

Even so, Hokum succeeds because McCarthy understands the mechanical pleasures of horror filmmaking at a level many contemporary prestige directors seem embarrassed by. Though the scares land with diminishing returns this time, McCarthy still stages them with the acute understanding of just how long we will stare into a dark hallway before resenting ourselves for it. His folklore imagery still carries the grubby charm of an R.L. Stine paperback pulled from a damp school library shelf, which gives the film a pulpy nastiness that suits it well. McCarthy never fully organises many of these elements into a clean mythology. What he does create is a horror film with texture and personality, even if it barely holds up against the mastery of its predecessors.

Hokum is currently running in theatres

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Jordan Firstman’s ‘Club Kid’ Sparks Eight-Figure Offers: Cannes

Published

on

Jordan Firstman’s ‘Club Kid’ Sparks Eight-Figure Offers: Cannes

Jordan Firstman‘s buzzy Cannes UCR title Club Kid has been the talk of the festival and market this past 24 hours.

Multiple suitors are in for the movie and what’s interesting is the size of those suitors. Multiple major studios have kicked the tyres on the project. Contrary to reports, the offers are already in the eight-figure range. They were there last night, we heard at the time.

Many have assumed this will be an A24 title come the final reckoning but there is strong competition for a movie one studio buyer just told me at an event is “the most commercial movie at the festival by far: it works on a number of different levels to different age groups”. Another festival regular I spoke to said they see it as an awards movie “for sure”. The domestic credentials are certainly strong. Some international buyers we’ve spoken to were a little cooler but ultimately who doesn’t want a heartfelt good-vibe movie.

UTA Independent Film Group is in the middle of the deal. Charades handles international.

Advertisement

Club Kid follows a washed-up party promoter who is forced to turn his life around when an unexpected visitor arrives. Reviews have been strong.

During the film’s seven-minute Cannes ovation yesterday, lead actress Cara Delevingne teared up. Firstman, who also wrote and stars, picked up costar Reggie Absolom (who plays the son of Firstman’s character in the film) and started a chant in his honor. It was a continuation of the hijinks the two got up to at the film’s photocall earlier in the day. 

There are multiple projects in the market also drawing good offers. Things should become clearer in next 48 hours.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending