Connect with us

Sports

The Maple Leafs ran it back again. It backfired again. What now?

Published

on

The Maple Leafs ran it back again. It backfired again. What now?

BOSTON — The call came last summer.

It was from the new general manager of the Toronto Maple Leafs, Brad Treliving, and he had a message for Mitch Marner.

“He made it pretty clear that he wanted to keep our core together,” Marner told The Athletic last fall. “He trusted our core.”

What now for the Leafs and that core after yet another early playoff exit?


“It’s an empty feeling right now,” William Nylander said in what’s become an all too familiar setting for the Leafs, an empty dressing room after a painful playoff loss.

Advertisement

Nylander’s stick, emblazoned with “Willy Styles,” was still standing against a wall in a corner. It wasn’t long after Game 7, and another first-round exit. The mood was dour.

“Look, I don’t think there’s an issue with the core,” Nylander said. “I think we were f—— right there all series battling — battling hard. We got it to Game 7 OT. It’s a s—– feeling.”

Auston Matthews called this particular Leafs team the tightest he’s ever been a part of. “I feel like we say that every year, but it truly was an incredible group, incredibly tight,” he said.

“We’re right there,” John Tavares said. “It’s a very small difference.”

The results are what they are though. The Leafs haven’t gotten close at all. Running it back with this core — Matthews, Marner, Nylander, Tavares, and Morgan Rielly — has not worked.

Advertisement

The Leafs ran it back after they were embarrassed by an inferior Columbus Blue Jackets team in 2020. They ran it back after they allowed a 3-1 series lead to melt away against the Montreal Canadiens, another inferior opponent, in 2021. The Leafs ran it back yet again after they lost in seven games to the Tampa Bay Lightning a year after that. And just when it looked like they would pivot last spring after dropping a five-game second-round series to the Florida Panthers, team president Brendan Shanahan fired then-GM Kyle Dubas and insisted again — with Treliving moving into the GM’s chair — that the core was staying put.

“Just being different doesn’t solve something,” Shanahan said when he announced Dubas’ firing.

And yet, clearly, the status quo didn’t solve anything either. If anything, just the opposite: The Leafs were dispatched again in the first round. Clawing back from a 3-1 series deficit to force Game 7 doesn’t change the fact that running it back one more time backfired.

Is this — finally — the time the Leafs pivot in a major way? And if so, who gets to make that call? And what exactly does it mean?

The question of running it back has to include the member of the core — management division — that never gets mentioned: Shanahan.

Advertisement

GO DEEPER

Johnston: Leafs’ latest playoff exit makes it clear. Time is up for the Shanaplan

No one is more responsible for the Leafs running back the same top end of the roster for so long without playoff results than him. If there was anyone who believed in the power of Matthews, Marner, Nylander, Tavares, and Rielly to get it done, it was him.

He believed over and over and over again despite the results.

After 10 seasons as team president, Shanahan’s Leafs have won one playoff round, which puts them in the same bracket as many of the worst teams in the league over the last decade.

Advertisement

It’s really kind of stunning.

Playoff wins since the 2014-15 season

The Leafs have been a top team in the regular season, and Shanahan deserves credit for that, but the goal isn’t to win the regular season. It’s to win in the playoffs and sticking with the same core group hasn’t yielded anything close to a Stanley Cup.

Losing in seven games in the first round isn’t “right there” as Tavares suggested.

Advertisement

Shanahan met with the new president of MLSE, Keith Pelley, earlier this week. Pelley should be asking why it is that Shanahan stuck with this particular group for so long when the results weren’t there when it mattered and, crucially, what he plans to do about it now after another defeat.

Should he even get that opportunity after a decade’s worth of chances?

Shanahan’s thinking went something like this: If the Leafs traded one of their great players away every time they had a playoff disappointment, eventually they might be left with no great players.

He believed that given enough time, enough scars, and enough cracks in the postseason, the stars would eventually come through and the team would be rewarded with the franchise’s first Stanley Cup since 1967.

The problem: The stars weren’t starry enough. Not when it mattered. And in a top-heavy system, like the one the Leafs have been operating with, the stars have to be stars when it matters. They didn’t get there enough, including this spring against Boston.

Advertisement

Shanahan liked to say that sticking to the plan was the hard part in Toronto.

Sticking to the plan for this long though has proven naive. Again and again, it ignored the evidence, which stated, emphatically, that while the players in question were talented — arguably the most talented the franchise had ever seen — for whatever reason the mix didn’t work when the games mattered most.

Something was missing. And the Leafs could have tried to address it at some point along the way. Maybe it wouldn’t have been a sledgehammer to the core, but a scalpel. One piece carved out, another different sort of piece slotted in.

Now, something will almost certainly change, at least a year too late.

The extenuating circumstances of this series — Nylander’s absence for Games 1-3 due to migraines, an illness and injury that derailed Matthews and knocked him out for Games 5 and 6 — won’t matter. They will be as lost to history as Tavares missing almost the entirety of that Montreal series to injury or Sergei Bobrovsky becoming a superhero again all of a sudden last spring.

Advertisement

The Pittsburgh Penguins won a Stanley Cup without Kris Letang in 2017. Steven Stamkos played one playoff game for the Tampa Bay Lightning during their Stanley Cup run in 2020. The teams that win find a way.

The Leafs had an opportunity to pivot in whatever direction they liked last offseason before no-movement clauses kicked in on the contracts of Marner, Nylander, and Matthews.

The date for that was July 1.

Had Dubas remained as GM, and maybe even increased his control of the franchise, the Leafs may have finally shook up their core by moving one of those players (Marner or Nylander) out. Instead, everything that mattered, including head coach Sheldon Keefe, stayed the same.

Now a decision regarding the core feels obvious.

Advertisement

Last summer, the Leafs signed Matthews to a four-year extension that will soon make him the highest-paid player in the league. Nylander got a full eight-year extension in January. Both players have full no-movement clauses.

So does Tavares.

The captain of the Leafs will be entering the last year of the seven-year contract he signed back in 2018. Born and raised in Toronto, and now with a growing young family, Tavares expressed no interest in leaving last summer when the prospect was raised by media.

Rielly likewise has a no-movement clause on a contract that still has another six seasons left on it.

Which leaves Marner, who’s eligible to sign an extension on July 1.

Advertisement

He, too, holds a no-movement clause, which means he only goes elsewhere if he wants to. Which means, at best, a limited pool of teams the Leafs can move him to — and thus, a limited pool of assets they can fetch in return.

Think of it this way: How many teams out there will be interested in a) taking on Marner’s $10.9 million cap hit for next season, b) want to pay him even more than that on an extension c) have attractive assets they would be willing to trade and assets that would be of interest to the Leafs?

All of which is to say, the Leafs boxed themselves in by waiting as long as they did. It’s going to be hard to make a good trade involving Marner, if that’s the route they take.


Does the Maple Leafs’ future include Mitch Marner and Auston Matthews together? (Nick Turchiaro / USA Today)

If not after the Montreal series, it felt like time for Marner after last season. He said all the right things about wanting to be a Leaf, to stay a Leaf, but throughout this past season, he looked a lot like someone who wasn’t enjoying all that comes with being a Leaf — the pressure, the scrutiny, the criticism, the relentless demand for more.

Marner’s poor start to the season was notable for how joyless he appeared, how devoid of enthusiasm and energy.

Advertisement

He finished with three points in seven games against the Bruins. He wasn’t the offensive difference-maker the Leafs needed him to be, especially early in the series when Nylander was absent.

He might be just as ready for a change as the Leafs are. He was prepared for the possibility last summer.

Absent extension talks, and the possibility of a long-term future in Toronto, he might be convinced to accept a trade elsewhere.

Then the question becomes: What should the Leafs look to fetch in return? It’s tempting to say a defenceman, and that might not be the wrong answer if it’s the right defenceman. But it’s not as if this franchise is stocked with high-end forwards beyond Matthews and Nylander.

Can the front office, whoever’s running it, thread the needle and acquire a higher-end forward and a defenceman? And what type of forward anyway? If the point is to try to change the “mix” does it have to be a forward of a different skill set than Marner? Someone harder and heavier to play against?

Advertisement

Or, do the Leafs just seek out the best possible player, period, presumably earning less than Marner, and use the remaining cap space elsewhere?

Are draft picks part of the package? Do the Leafs need to make picks part of the package given their limited supply?

And again, which team has what the Leafs want, meets Marner’s desires if he wants to leave at all, and wants to pay him?

If they are the two key players still running the show, can Shanahan and Treliving get this right? Their first season together as president and GM didn’t go great. They failed to adequately address needs last summer and then let the trade deadline come and go without any meaningful reinforcements, which led to yet another first-round loss.

Can they execute a Marner trade in a way that makes the Leafs better, or at worst, different?

Advertisement

As Treliving himself said last summer when the prospect of moving core players came up at his introductory press conference, “You can throw a body under the tarmac and it might look good for a headline, but are you getting any better? At the end of the day, it’s about getting better. And just being different doesn’t necessarily make you better.”

Not anymore. The Leafs need to be different and get better at the same time. Running it back — again — isn’t an option.

(Top photo of John Tavares, Tyler Bertuzzi and Morgan Rielly: Michael Dwyer / The Associated Press)

Advertisement

Sports

Walter Alston, Dave Roberts and everyone in between: The 10 managers in L.A. Dodgers history

Published

on

Walter Alston, Dave Roberts and everyone in between: The 10 managers in L.A. Dodgers history
p]:text-cms-story-body-color-text clearfix”>

Dodgers manager Tommy Lasorda celebrates after the Dodgers beat the Montreal Expos to win the NL pennant in 1981.

(Associated Press)

Years as manager: 1976-1996

Advertisement

Record: 1,599-1,439, .526 win pct

After serving as the team’s third base coach for four seasons, Lasorda took over as manager late in the 1976 season when Alston announced his retirement. He led the Dodgers to the National League pennant in his first two full seasons, losing both times to the Yankees in the World Series. He won his first World Series in 1981, knocking off the Yankees, and rallied his team to a surprise title in 1988 in which the Dodgers beat the heavily favored Athletics. Lasorda was inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame in 1997, his first year of eligibility.

A fiery and vibrant presence who spent 71 years with the Dodgers, Lasorda managed nine players who won the NL rookie of the year award. The Dodgers also opened the Japanese player pipeline on his watch. Hideo Nomo, the first Japanese big leaguer to permanently relocate to the U.S., joined the Dodgers in 1995. Three decades later, the team features Shohei Ohtani and Yoshinobu Yamamoto on its star-studded roster.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

LeBron James Next Team Odds: Warriors, Cavaliers, Heat In Mix

Published

on

LeBron James Next Team Odds: Warriors, Cavaliers, Heat In Mix

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Back in January, the odds that King James would retire before the beginning of the 2026-27 season were slightly longer than the odds that he would give it another go.

But as of now, it looks like LeBron will, in fact, give it another go but with a team other than the Lakers.

Here are the latest odds for where James could land next season at DraftKings Sportsbook as of June 30.

This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX Sports may be compensated. Read more about Sports Betting on FOX Sports.

Advertisement

LeBron James Next Team Odds

Golden State Warriors: -115 (bet $10 to win $18.70 total)
Los Angeles Lakers: +105 (bet $10 to win $20.50 total)
Cleveland Cavaliers: +600 (bet $10 to win $70 total)
Miami Heat: +1000 (bet $10 to win $110 total)
New York Knicks: +3000 (bet $10 to win $310 total)
Detroit Pistons: +3000 (bet $10 to win $310 total)
Dallas Mavericks: +3000 (bet $10 to win $310 total)
San Antonio Spurs: +3500 (bet $10 to win $360 total)
Milwaukee Bucks: +4000 (bet $10 to win $410 total)
Brooklyn Nets: +4000 (bet $10 to win $410 total)
Washington Wizards: +5000 (bet $10 to win $510 total)

NBA free agency begins on June 30 at 6 p.m. ET. However, hours before its official start, LeBron James’ agent, Rich Paul, made a jaw-dropping announcement. 

According to ESPN reporting, Paul notified the Lakers that the franchise could move on without LeBron because he plans to play elsewhere for the 2026-27 season.

James played for the organization for eight years — the longest he’s played for any other team. While in L.A., King James broke the all-time scoring record, won an NBA title and earned his fourth NBA Finals MVP.

Advertisement

The imprint he’s left on the league in his more than 20 years has been immeasurable.

Where will LeBron land next season now that his time in Los Angeles is over?

In addition to his tenure in Los Angeles, he’s played for the Cavaliers and the Heat, winning titles with all three franchises. He won Rookie of the Year, has four regular-season MVPs and is a 22-time All-Star.

James has averaged 26.8 points, 7.5 boards and 7.4 assists over the course of his career.

During the 2025-26 season, he helped lead the Lakers to a 53-29 record in the regular season. The team secured the No. 4 seed in the Western Conference and defeated Houston 4-2 in the first round. 

Advertisement

Eventually, Los Angeles got bounced by Oklahoma City in the conference semifinals, 4-0, which marked LeBron’s last dance in Hollywood.

Continue Reading

Sports

Contributor: U.S.-born Brian Gutiérrez and Obed Vargas signal a new era for Mexico’s national team

Published

on

Contributor: U.S.-born Brian Gutiérrez and Obed Vargas signal a new era for Mexico’s national team

After the total failure that was Mexico’s participation in the Qatar 2022 World Cup, where they were eliminated in the group stage, the future looked very dire for “El Tri.” By 2024, the situation had worsened after another international failure at the Copa América. The 2026 World Cup co-hosts had even more pressure now. In a crisis-control move, the Mexico Football Federation opted to bring back its proven problem solver, head coach “El Vasco” Javier Aguirre, for a third stint.

In a short time, Aguirre was able to shape “El Tri” into a competitive squad by breaking from his usual approach. The man who shockingly demoted then-24-year-old goalkeeper Guillermo “Memo” Ochoa in favor of a more experienced player prior to the 2010 World Cup was now relying on upstarts.

Aguirre’s 26-man roster for the 2026 World Cup features 14 debutants on soccer’s grandest stage.The crown jewel of this nucleus is undoubtedly 17-year-old wonderkid Gilberto Mora, but there are also two American-born players who are also expected to become pillars of the team: Brian Gutiérrez, from Berwyn, Ill., and Obed Vargas, from Anchorage, Alaska.

Under Article 30, Section A, Part II of the Mexican Constitution, individuals born abroad are considered Mexican by birth if they are children of Mexican parents — a Mexican mother or a Mexican father. Gutiérrez’s parents are from San Juan de los Lagos, Jalisco, while Vargas’ father is a native of Morelia, Michoacán, and his mother was raised in Mexico City.

Advertisement

“Obviously, I’m taking it day by day and just trying to enjoy the experience,” said Gutiérrez about the opportunity to play for Mexico at the World Cup. “I talk about it a lot with my friends and family. Honestly, it’s amazing… I’m just living in the moment.”

Gutiérrez, 22, and Vargas, 20, are not the first players born in the United States to represent Mexico in a World Cup. That distinction belongs to Miguel Ponce and Isaac Brizuela, who were both born in California and part of the 2014 squad. But the comparisons largely end there.

Unlike Ponce and Brizuela, Gutiérrez and Vargas were fully raised in the United States and went through their entire soccer development on American fields. Ponce and Brizuela were also fringe contributors; they didn’t see any minutes in Brazil 2014.

Meanwhile, Gutiérrez and Vargas are already getting important playing time with the national team. Both were part of Mexico’s historic group stage where, for the first time in history, the team won all three of its games. Gutiérrez was a starter against South Africa and South Korea, while Vargas came off the bench to help preserve the 1-0 lead over South Korea.

Their protagonism in Aguirre’s squad could also signal another new era for the Mexican national team — one in which Mexican American players are just as vital as those born on Mexican soil.

Advertisement

“Brian and Obed are two young players of Mexican heritage. They are very talented players who have made great progress recently. We called them up, and they convinced us with their performances,” said Aguirre prior to the tournament. “I believe there are many Mexican American players who, in the future, will continue strengthening Mexico’s youth national teams, including the women’s side. That makes me happy because they were not born in Mexico, yet they have a deep love for the country and have shown it by choosing to represent us.”

Both Gutiérrez and Vargas are also products of MLS academies.

Gutiérrez, a skillful and dynamic attacking midfielder, rose through the ranks of Chicago Fire’s youth system and made his senior debut in 2020. In December, he moved to storied Liga MX club Chivas, his childhood team. It took time for Gutiérrez to establish himself as a starter for Gabriel Milito’s squad, but his game-changing talent was there — enough to catch the eye of “El Vasco.”

Vargas, a box-to-box midfielder, developed through the Seattle Sounders youth system and debuted with the senior team in 2021. A strong showing against Atlético de Madrid in the 2025 Club World Cup led to the Spanish club adding him to its roster this February. This move also put him in Aguirre’s World Cup plans.

“Playing for Mexico at the World Cup is a dream come true for all Mexican American kids,” said Vargas. “Obviously, with the World Cup being in both countries, it’s special to me. I have connections and ties to both countries.”

Advertisement

For so long, it was said Mexican American players just could not earn a place with Mexico at the international level. Players like Édgar Castillo and Alejandro Zendejas — born in Juárez but raised in El Paso — represented “El Tri” up to the U-23 level, then switched and played for the U.S. Jonathan González (Santa Rosa, Calif.) represented the U.S. at youth level and then chose Mexico, but after a few call-ups he fell out of the picture.

But in this World Cup cycle, Mexican American players have stood out more than ever.

Aguirre’s preliminary 55-man World Cup roster included six Mexican American players. Richard Ledezma (Phoenix), Efraín Álvarez (Los Angeles), Jorge Ruvalcaba (Rialto), and Julián Araujo (Lompoc, Calif.) ultimately missed the final cut. Of the four, Ledezma and Araujo came closest to making the team, but for different reasons fell short.

Vargas believes it was only a matter of time before the talent broke through.

“I think Mexican American players have always been there. The quality has always been there. Obviously, the growing passion for the sport in the United States has helped fuel the development of many of those players,” said Vargas. “I think it’s amazing to see so many Mexican Americans doing well with the national teams of both the United States and Mexico. Dreams come true for kids, and that continues to inspire the next generation of Mexican American players coming through in the U.S.”

Advertisement

Gutiérrez and Vargas, like many standout Mexican American players over the last 15 years, began their paths with “El Tri” amid a long-standing tug-of-war between their birth country and the country of their parents. The Mexico men’s national team and their U.S. counterparts have increasingly become rivals, both on the field and in recruiting dual-national players.

For Mexico, the United States now represents a prime area for scouting outside its territory. According to the Migration Policy Institute’s (MPI) tabulation of data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2022 American Community Survey, approximately 38.8 million U.S. residents were either born in Mexico or reported Mexican ancestry or origin.

Not only do Mexican American players expand the national team’s talent pool, but as some argue, they also bring a different element that can be a major advantage for the program.

Former Mexico youth coach and current Guatemala coach Luis Fernando Tena recently raised eyebrows in an interview with ESPN Deportes by stating that Mexican American players possess qualities that can set them apart from homegrown Mexican players.

“They have an American mindset. They grew up with that mentality and with good nutrition, and that makes them different,” said Tena, who led Mexico’s U-23 team to the gold medal at the 2012 London Olympics. “They are more disciplined, work harder, and are more focused — something that we sometimes don’t always find in many Mexican-born players.”

Advertisement

Gutiérrez and Vargas started their international careers representing Team USA at youth level, but FIFA’s one-time switch rule allowed them to change allegiances.

Vargas said he chose Mexico because he simply “followed his heart.” His love for his heritage and the Mexican national team outweighed everything else.

As for Gutiérrez, he was motivated to make the change because his time at Chivas convinced him. In Liga MX, the club has been at the forefront of tapping into the Mexican diaspora in the U.S. Their long-standing “Mexicans-only” policy limits the club’s talent pool when acquiring players. Because of this, Mexican American players are becoming a vital lifeline for Chivas.

“As soon as I arrived at Chivas, I knew my decision was to represent Mexico because we play with 100% Mexicans, that’s just how it is,” said Gutiérrez.

Opportunity may have also played a major role in Gutiérrez’s and Vargas’s “one-time switch” decisions. Both had no clear pathway into the U.S. senior squad, while Mexico offered a clearer route — and a chance at the 2026 World Cup.

Advertisement

In a 2023 interview, El Paso native Ricardo Pepi, who made the one-time switch from Mexico to the U.S., said on the Men in Blazers podcast that his decision was influenced by the fact that the U.S. had him in mind for the senior squad, while “El Tri” did not.

“It was just easy to decide. The U.S. wanted me to join them in World Cup qualifiers, which is a big deal,” said Pepi. “It’s a unique opportunity, being at a World Cup, and something I didn’t even have to think about because Mexico wanted me for the U-20s and eventually the first team. I was like, ‘I’m past that.’”

Although Gutiérrez and Vargas chose Mexico and embrace their parents’ culture, their duality is still present. They carry their communities with them.

A year ago, when aggressive ICE raids and mass deportations swept through many immigrant communities in the United States, particularly Mexican immigrant communities, a visibly frustrated Aguirre refused to comment on the situation, saying he was “apolitical” and not “a spokesperson” for the Mexican people.

This was not the case with Gutiérrez and Vargas, who both addressed questions about the ICE raids during Mexico’s World Cup media day in Pasadena, where they switched seamlessly between English and Spanish.

Advertisement

Gutiérrez answered without hesitation. His hometown of Berwyn is a suburb of Chicago, a city that in September was targeted by “Operation Midway Blitz,” a major federal immigration enforcement surge. According to the Chicago Tribune, between 3,800 and 4,500 individuals were detained or arrested during the operation.

Gutiérrez’s words reflected the strain felt throughout his community.

“It’s been a hard, hard year for us,” Gutiérrez said. “It’s affected a lot of families, and I take playing for Mexico with great pride and hope to show it on the field.”

It’s no secret that a large part of Mexico’s fanbase is composed of Mexican Americans. They are the ones who help fill massive NFL stadiums for “El Tri’s” annual MexTour, a slate of mostly inconsequential friendly matches that are often seen as a cash grab for the Mexican Football Federation. The presence of standout players like Gutiérrez and Vargas is a major development for this segment of the fanbase.

By featuring players with shared cultural experiences and struggles, the connection between the Mexican diaspora in the U.S. and “El Tri” can only strengthen. The ties now go beyond simply sharing the same roots; Mexican Americans can now gravitate toward a team with players who represent their dual identity. And this can bring a true sense of belonging.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending