Connect with us

Colorado

Protect rule of law, keep Eastman out of Colorado courtrooms | BIDLACK

Published

on

Protect rule of law, keep Eastman out of Colorado courtrooms | BIDLACK







Advertisement

Hal Bidlack



As I sat down to write my first column of the week, I was once again confronted with the challenge of narrowing down the pile of Colorado Politics stories that caught my eye to a manageable level. A terrific story you should stop and read right now concerns the degree to which Colorado’s lowest levels of government are functioning or, all too often, are not functioning. I’ve often written about the simple fact though Americans pay the most attention to the national level of government, it is the lowest levels — city and county — that have the greatest impact on your lives. This CoPo story really drives the point home.

You may recall an earlier column, when I mentioned while I was working for U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet, I spent 25 minutes on the phone with a constituent who had a big pothole in front of his house. He had it in his mind Bennet should personally come out and inspect the hole, before directing federal resources (maybe the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers?) to fill it up. I offered the caller the phone number of the county works department, but he wanted Sen. Bennet, dadgummit, because he paid Bennet’s salary.

It is the local levels that really matter most to most folks, even if they don’t believe it. And ace journalist Thelma Grimes does a terrific job explaining the challenges facing many of Colorado’s smaller communities when it comes to governance. But since she did such a great job, I won’t try to comment on it, but you do want to read it.

But I’m not going to talk about that.

Advertisement

Instead, I’d like to note another CoPo story, one that involves one of the top conspirators in the Big Lie and former President Donald Trump’s false assertion of massive voter fraud. It seems John Eastman, a lawyer with surprisingly unlawful thoughts, is in danger of being thrown off the conservative team pursuing a civil law case here in Colorado. The case involves alleged reprimands against a student who wore patches that apparently violated school policy. One was the Gadsden Flag and other patches with guns.

Stay up to speed: Sign up for daily opinion in your inbox Monday-Friday

But in Colorado, to be a lawyer on a case you must be in good standing with the court systems in whatever other states you practice. Eastman’s law license has been suspended in California, and that suspension therefore renders him ineligible to practice law in Colorado. The California judge, after a long trial, ruled Eastman committed misconduct for “dishonesty, failure to support the laws and the Constitution” as well as “moral turpitude.”

Oh, and he also faces actual criminal charges in Georgia and was indicted just last week in Arizona. Eastman has until May 10 to explain to a judge why he should still be eligible to practice in the Centennial State. I wouldn’t hold my breath, were I he.

One fascinating thing I learned from the story was Eastman spent some time on the faculty of the University of Colorado at Boulder as a “visiting scholar in conservative thought and policy,” which I think is a terrific thing for the school to do. When I was teaching at the Air Force Academy, I would often drive my students, who tended to be quite conservative overall, a bit nuts by pointing out research has clearly shown that the more education you get, the more liberal you grow. That part is undeniable.

Advertisement

The cause, of course, is where the disagreement lies. Liberals will say that shift in thinking is because the more you learn, the more liberal positions become clearly the proper way of looking at things. As Stephen Colbert said (while in character as his comedic conservative persona at a White House Correspondents Dinner), reality has a well-known liberal bias. Conservatives will say the shift is because universities are dominated by liberal professors who essentially brainwash the students to be more liberal.

And so, given the controversy, I was actually quite pleased to see CU-Boulder brought in Eastman (whose scholarship, before Trump, was thoughtful and powerful) to expressly represent the conservative point of view. He was on campus during the 2020-2021 school year. It didn’t, unfortunately, go all that well, in that so few students signed up for his class it was cancelled, but Eastman was permitted to continue his academic research for the rest of the school year.

Eastman is not the first Trump lawyer to lose his ability to practice law in Colorado due to election lies. L. Lin Wood was also barred from practicing here because he was no longer in good standing in his home state of Georgia. Heck, in addition to false claims of election fraud, Wood even suggested firing squads should execute Mike Pence.

The Trump spider web is large, but ironically it seems to often ensnare those who had been most loyal and enthusiastic of the Big Lie. All this while the former president sits each day in a courtroom, charged with dozens of felonies.

I’m not a lawyer, but from a lay position, it seems right to me if a professional, be it a lawyer, a doctor, a pharmacist, or other licensed professional, loses a license in one state due to criminal-ish actions, you shouldn’t be able to just move to another state and hang out a shingle.

Advertisement

John Eastman is not a stupid man. He’s actually quite bright. And so, this is not the case of a minion whose attention was captured by something shiny. Rather, his story is that of a very bright man who was willing to subvert the fundamental laws of the nation to essentially stage a coup.

I’m perfectly content not having him in Colorado courtrooms.

Hal Bidlack is a retired professor of political science and a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel who taught more than 17 years at the U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs.



Source link

Advertisement

Colorado

Colorado Rockies spring training game no. 17 thread: Kyle Freeland vs. Jedisxson Paez

Published

on

Colorado Rockies spring training game no. 17 thread: Kyle Freeland vs. Jedisxson Paez


In his first spring training action of 2026, Kyle Freeland faced the daunting task of pitching against Team USA in an exhibition game on March 4. He gave up a solo homer to Aaron Judge in a two-hit, one-strikeout performance in one inning.

Today, Freeland and the Rockies (8-6-1) will take part in his first Cactus League action against the White Sox (10-7) at Camelback Ranch. The Rockies are 5-2 on the road this spring vs. 3-5-1, including the showdown vs. Team USA, at Salt River Fields.

Advertisement

Today’s game represents a rematch of a Feb. 23 showdown where the Rockies beat the White Sox 5-4. Chicago will send Jedisxson Paez to the mound to start the game. The 22-year-old RHP will be making his third spring appearance. He’s posted a 23.14 ERA in 2 1/3 innings over two starts with six earned runs, six hits, including one homer, three strikeouts and one walk. Former Rockie Drew Romo will be starting at catcher for the White Sox.

Advertisement

On Sunday, four pitchers combined to throw five scoreless innings and Kyle Karros and Tyler Freeman each had two-hit performances in the Rockies 4-4 tie with Cleveland. Even though it’s only spring training, the Rockies offense has been much improved thus far. The Rockies rank among all Major League teams this Spring in: on-base percentage (.381, T-1st), home runs (23, T-4th), average (.287, 3rd), HBP (14, T-2nd), slugging (.492, 3rd), OPS (.871, 3rd), runs scored (98, 5th), RBI (91, 6th) and total bases (254, 6th).

Earlier on Monday, the Rockies released a new motto for the 2026 campaign: “New era. At altitude. We are here for the climb.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Outraged over incentives for data centers that are no good for Colorado (Letters)

Published

on

Outraged over incentives for data centers that are no good for Colorado (Letters)


Data centers: What good are they for Colorado?

Re: “Dueling policies for data centers,” March 1 news story

The Denver Post article about two competing bills in the legislature regarding new data centers in Colorado seems to start with the presumption that we want the data centers.

Why do we want them and who wants them? Is it the politicians wanting bragging rights about our state becoming another Silicon Valley? Perhaps they want more businesses so they can collect more taxes from the new residents. Alternatively, they just want more power in Washington by increasing our population. Has anyone stopped to ask why we want to attract more people to our state?

Colorado is in a fight with other Western states to obtain more water for our growing population. Our wildlife is being crowded out by the increased urbanization. The roads are so crowded that it is not uncommon to come to a complete stop on our interchanges during rush hour. We have a serious housing shortage. The air is being polluted by the increased number of cars. These are all the result of a growing population. Did anyone stop to ask why we want more people?

Advertisement

During my 53 years living in Colorado, I have never heard anyone (other than politicians) say, “We need more people.” On the contrary, the conversation is more often about how we are becoming overcrowded. I would like the politicians to explain why we need more businesses and more people in our state. It should not be a presumption that more is better! Are our elected representatives truly reflecting the wishes of their constituents?

Doug Hurst, Parker

Anger and disbelief were our reactions when we read about House Bill 1030, which is under consideration at the statehouse. This outrageous corporate welfare bill would provide some of the world’s wealthiest corporations with massive state tax reductions to build monstrous resource-thirsty data centers. Analysts projected a $92.5 million tax loss in just three years if a bunch of these data centers are built. Just one 160-megawatt facility would gobble up as much power as 176,000 homes once completed. Consider for comparison that the entire DIA airport uses around 45 megawatts of power!

As the state legislature grapples with bone-deep budget cuts, we cannot afford to exempt data centers from paying their own way nor allow their unregulated construction. Taxpayer-funded corporate handouts would entail massive hits to tax revenue that should be used for our schools, roads, infrastructure, and valid state needs. What essential services will potentially be cut or axed to cover the lost revenue to the state from this corporate giveaway?

These data centers also demand massive amounts of our water. A CoreSite data center in Denver alone will use approximately 805,000 gallons of water per day to air-condition its computers. That is the same as the average daily indoor water use of 16,100 Denver homes.

Advertisement

I pray our state legislature will condemn HB-1030 to the corporate welfare hell where it belongs in. Instead, they should support Senate Bill 102 that will hopefully properly regulate these tax-eating, water-wasting, and electricity-gobbling monstrosities.

Terry Talbot, Grand Junction



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Skier killed in avalanche in Colorado’s Boss Basin, first ski death of the season

Published

on

Skier killed in avalanche in Colorado’s Boss Basin, first ski death of the season


Early Sunday morning, Colorado rescue crews found the body of a missing skier who was killed in a recent avalanche.

The skier was reported missing in the Boss Basin area in the upper portion of Resolution Creek on March 7.

Advertisement

Colorado Avalanche Information Center


Summit County Rescue Group, Vail Mountain Rescue and the Summit and Eagle County Sheriff’s Offices began searching the area and discovered the site of the avalanche. They noticed that nearby ski and snowmobile tracks led up to where it occurred.

The Colorado Avalanche Information Center says Flight for Life helped with the search. They found the body of the missing skier in the avalanche debris on Sunday, around sunrise.

boss-basin-fatal-avalanche-1-slide-from-caic-on-fb.jpg

Advertisement

Colorado Avalanche Information Center


CAIC staff said the avalanche started near the treeline on a northeast-facing slope and was about two feet deep. The slope angles ranged from 33 to 36 degrees.

According to CAIC data, this is the first person killed in an avalanche during the 2025-2026 ski season.

colorado-avalanche-danger-march-8-2026.png

Colorado Avalanche Information Center

Advertisement


Avalanche danger in some parts of the high country is considerable, particularly on north- and east-facing slopes and on large open slopes just below ridgelines.

The CAIC Forecast for Sunday says:

“The avalanche danger will stay at CONSIDERABLE (3of5) on Sunday for the places that picked up the most snow in this last storm (Elk and Sawatch Ranges). Areas that received less than 8 inches will go back to MODERATE danger, but this may vary significantly from drainage to drainage and with elevation. Assume a higher danger if you find a foot or more of new snow. Across the region, wind-drifted slopes will remain the most dangerous regardless of the danger. In the shallower areas (Elks and Sawatch), we’re more concerned about avalanches in motion breaking deeper, failing in buried facet layers.

On Sunday, as the sun pops out, remember that a strong spring sun can make sunny slopes unstable rather quickly. Keep an eye out for roller balls as an indication of a forthcoming shed cycle of loose avalanches.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending