Connect with us

Sports

Dangerous games: What's next for Mike Brown, Vivek Ranadivé and the Sacramento Kings

Published

on

Dangerous games: What's next for Mike Brown, Vivek Ranadivé and the Sacramento Kings

NEW ORLEANS — Fresh off a redemptive demolition of the favored Golden State Warriors in a win-or-go-home game — stomping out a rival’s season as bluntly as had been done to them in the same building a year prior — the Sacramento Kings skipped into New Orleans last week with a level of growing confidence.

There was organizational belief they could and should beat the Pelicans, who were playing without the injured Zion Williamson. And, if initial mission was accomplished, they had enough talent to at least threaten the Oklahoma City Thunder in the first round of the NBA playoffs. They had built a winning foundation (94-70) in coach Mike Brown’s two years, snapping in the process an embarrassing 16-year playoff drought that was the longest in North American professional sports at the time.

But those good vibes were extinguished quickly in New Orleans in another loser-go-home game. Kings controlling owner Vivek Ranadivé watched stoically from a courtside seat near the team’s bench as the season faded away. When it was over, he immediately walked into the tunnel and directly out of the arena through the loading dock, trudging into an offseason full of delicate decisions.

An hour later, as players and coaches came to grips with failing to reach the playoffs, one veteran was asked: Despite the tangible step back, is there at least a level of stability developing?

“Yeah,” the veteran said. “Because we’re not gonna let go of our front office and we’re not going to fire our coaching staff. In Sacramento, that’s a pretty big deal.”

Advertisement

Brown signed a four-year contract in the summer of 2022. But the fourth season, according to league sources, is a mutual option. So for practical purposes, next season is the final guaranteed year on his current deal.

That’s typically extension time in the coaching world. Brown desires a longer-term commitment at his market rate, per league sources, and brings a substantial body of work to the table. The Kings have grown in legitimacy since his arrival, both as a basketball and business entity. But a nuanced negotiation awaits.

Success has a price tag. Steve Kerr ($17.5 million annually), Gregg Popovich ($16 million) and Monty Williams ($13 million) have reset the coaching market since Brown signed his deal. He wouldn’t command Kerr or Popovich money, but it’s fair to assume, considering reputation and résumé, the offer would need to reach double-digit million annually.

Will Ranadivé reward Brown for the progress that has been made, focusing on the bigger picture in play here and the need for the kind of coaching stability that evaded the Kings for so long? Or might he hesitate to pay the increased market value, with their playoff absence this season giving him reason to pause?

Team sources say there’s been a wait-and-see approach from the ownership side to this point, with a feeling from those around the franchise that singular results — the huge win over the Warriors, the gut-punch loss to the Pelicans — could weigh heavily in future decision-making.

Advertisement

That’s a dangerous game to play. Ranadivé has not yet approached Brown with an extension offer. Both sides have known for months now that this discussion was nearing, but the outcome of it will set the tone for the next Kings season to come. Without a resolution, it has a chance to become a distraction.


The Kings went 15-8 against six of this season’s eight Western Conference playoff teams. They swept the Lakers in four meetings, finished 3-1 against the Denver Nuggets, 2-1 against the Minnesota Timberwolves and 2-2 against the Oklahoma City Thunder, LA Clippers and Phoenix Suns. They have reason to believe they can compete with the top of the conference.

“I feel like we got better,” Domantas Sabonis said. “We just couldn’t finish some games. We dropped a couple, the West is tougher. We kind of put ourselves in a bad situation.”

Two problems surfaced: They couldn’t solve the Pelicans’ length and shooting. New Orleans went 6-0 against them, a tricky matchup that continually killed them at the wrong time. Then there’s the more debilitating issue. The Kings too often no-showed at the wrong time. Here’s a list of non-playoff teams that beat them: Charlotte Hornets, Detroit Pistons, Houston Rockets, Portland Trail Blazers and Washington Wizards. The Rockets doing so thrice. The Kings won only two fewer games than the season before (48 to 46), but still dropped from third to ninth in the crowded Western Conference standings, ultimately failing to check that playoff box.

“It’s easy to focus on the last two weeks,” Harrison Barnes said, alluding to a stretch in which the Kings went 3-6. “People say: ‘Oh, look at the Dallas games, the back-to-back against the Pelicans and Suns.’”

Advertisement

Those losses came after key players Malik Monk and Kevin Huerter suffered season-ending injuries, bumping the Kings from the fifth or sixth seed (where they sat most of the season) to the ninth seed.

“But I think there’s a lot of games early in the season (to blame),” Barnes said. “We had games we didn’t show up, games where we didn’t have the right approach. Stack those up and you look at where things finish, if we would have had three or four more wins, five more wins, where would we be?”

Four more wins would’ve meant the fifth seed and Game 1 of a playoff series after a week of rest.

“To me, I think that’s where a step has to be taken,” Barnes said. “Look at the six teams that were in the playoffs (prior to the Play-In Tournament). Those teams did a good job of taking care of business against the teams that were below .500. That was the step that we did not take this year.”


Mike Brown and the Kings dropped from third to ninth in the West this season. (Sergio Estrada / USA Today)

No one should be surprised a step backward was not well received by Ranadivé — or any of the Kings, for that matter. He bought the team in 2013 and shuffled through six coaches before Brown, displaying an impulsive streak that was scrutinized all along the way. But the tide had turned some, his once-tattered reputation repaired in NBA circles. Last season’s playoff return was a blissful moment for him and his organization. To get here, he made a series of pivotal hires paramount to the recent success.

Advertisement

Monte McNair, the longtime Houston Rockets executive, was given his first general manager job in September 2020, replacing Vlade Divac after his tumultuous exit. McNair built a respectable front office and sparked the Kings’ resurgence. He drafted Tyrese Haliburton and Keegan Murray, flipped Haliburton for Sabonis and built around the De’Aaron Fox, Sabonis, Murray trio.

Brown was hired in May 2022, plucked from a Warriors organization Ranadivé knows so well, having spent time there as a minority owner. Brown was the first unanimous NBA Coach of the Year in his first season with the franchise. When judged against the backdrop of the Kings’ woeful history, this front office-coach pairing has been an indisputable hit.

Yet, while team sources say Brown will definitely return for next season, the conversation about his value beyond the 2024-25 campaign runs the risk of being complicated and, potentially, uncomfortable if Ranadivé is unwilling to reinvest in this partnership.

It’s about both basketball and business. Not only has Brown led a winning program in his time in Sacramento, but also the team’s ability to remain relevant all season has been a game-changer on the financial front when it comes to keeping fans engaged.

That’s quite a change from the Kings’ days of old, when even their most ardent loyalists would lose interest once the team fell in the standings during the second half of the season. When it comes to the way the Kings are viewed within the league and agent world, the optics have improved greatly since Brown’s arrival. And while the Kings’ offense that was the league’s best two seasons ago regressed, Brown sees long-term promise in that the defense — which has long been an issue in Sacramento — improved from 24th in his first season to 14th in his second. As Brown’s side sees it, the list of reasons justifying a new market-value deal is long.

For Ranadivé, though, there’s surely frustration with the fact that the Dr. Jekyll-and-Mr. Hyde ways of this Kings team ultimately cost it an invitation to the postseason party. The meeting of the minds, if there’s going to be one, will need to be somewhere in between.

Advertisement

About an hour before the season-ender on Friday night in New Orleans, Ranadivé and his daughter, Anjali, posed for a picture on the court. They held up the back of the jean jacket that Anjali wore to the game and posted it on Instagram. It had Monk’s name and number spray-painted onto it.

Luka Dončić fell on Monk’s right knee on March 29. It sprained his MCL. Monk couldn’t make it back, stripping the Kings of their third-most productive player during the stretch run, generating an unanswerable “what if?” about the playoff ceiling of this team.

Now there’s another: What if Monk leaves this summer? In an interview with The Athletic in early March, Monk expressed a desire to return. Ownership, management, coaches and teammates all want him back.

But the Kings are in a financial crunch. CBA rules limit what they can give Monk. The projected max starting salary they can offer is $17.4 million, translating into a four-year, $77.9 million max long-term offer if extended out with maximum allowable raises.

There’s fear that a team with plenty of cap room, knowing these constraints, will swoop in with a similar long-term offer in the $100 million range that could be too lucrative for Monk to decline. He’s 26 and was nearly out of the league a couple years ago.

Advertisement

“Money talks,” Fox said. “You can’t play this game forever. We have such a short window to play basketball. Not everyone is going to be (LeBron James) or (Chris Paul), play 19, 20 years. You have to be able to get paid whenever you can. That’s what Vince Carter told me. He played 21, 22 years. I’d love to have (Malik) back, but I don’t know what the future holds.”

If Monk departs, the Kings can’t use all that money in free agency. They’ll be limited to the midlevel exception, projected at $12.9 million. There should be some rotation players available in that range, but the larger question is whether this team needs a more substantial piece, someone alongside Fox and Sabonis in the pecking order.

That would need to be done via trade. Because they missed the playoffs, the Kings retained their first-round pick in June’s draft. It’ll be either 13th or 14th. They still owe a top-12 protected first-round pick to Atlanta next season for the Huerter deal.

But the draft asset cupboard is still pretty loaded and they have plenty of mid-sized contracts to facilitate deals. Barnes makes $18 million next season. Huerter makes $16.8 million. Trey Lyles makes $8 million.

The Kings front office was protective of Murray in trade talks for Pascal Siakam and others near the trade deadline. It’s difficult to imagine that changing. But McNair, in an interview with The Athletic last summer, did indicate there’d be a time to press fast forward if the opportunity presents: “I think we’re in a spot where if there is an aggressive play out there, we’ll be one of the teams that can knock on that door.”

Advertisement

That’s the rub for these Kings. They’re stuck, for now, on the doorstep of something special.

They have foundational players such as Fox and Sabonis, whose presence raises their collective floor, but lack the sort of dynamic talent (even potentially at the top-end) and depth that would elevate them to true contention. They added Sasha Vezenkov and Chris Duarte last summer, but neither could crack the regular rotation.

They enter the summer with roster flexibility that could lead to real improvements, but more than enough uncertainty on that front to inspire some angst. Do they have the sort of organizational continuity that is so important in times like these? That part remains to be seen.

“There’s something to build off still,” Fox told reporters after the loss to the Pelicans. “The West isn’t getting any easier. It’s a disappointment not being in the playoffs. But it’s something to build off … Obviously there is a lot more stability than there has been in the past. But as a team we have to get better. You never know what can happen.”

(Illustration: Dan Goldfarb / The Athletic; photo courtesy of Rocky Widnern, Kelsey Grant, Jed Jacobsohn /NBAE / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Sports

Russell Wilson escalates feud with Sean Payton, labels Broncos coach ‘classless’

Published

on

Russell Wilson escalates feud with Sean Payton, labels Broncos coach ‘classless’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Russell Wilson and Sean Payton spent just one NFL season together, but tension lingered after a rocky year.

And it appears the tension that built up from that tumultuous stretch continues to linger.

Wilson’s interview on the “Bussin’ With the Boys” podcast, recorded before last month’s Super Bowl between Seattle and New England, recently resurfaced. 

In the interview, Wilson doubled down on his October comment labeling Payton “classless,” saying he felt slighted by his former coach’s remarks.

Advertisement

Head coach Sean Payton of the Denver Broncos talks to quarterback Russell Wilson on the sideline during an NFL preseason football game against the Arizona Cardinals at State Farm Stadium Aug. 11, 2023, in Glendale, Ariz. (Ryan Kang/Getty Images)

“[When] you’ve been on the same side or this and that, and I got the same amount of rings as you got, meaning Sean, right?” said Wilson, who won a Super Bowl with the Seattle Seahawks as Payton did coaching for the New Orleans Saints. 

“I got a lot of respect for him as a play-caller, this and that, but to take a shot, I don’t like. I don’t think it’s necessary, you know, I mean, especially when I’m not even on your own team anymore. So, for me, there’s a point in time where you have to, I’ve realized, I’ve stayed quiet for so long. There’s a there’s a time and place where I’m not.

“I know who I am as a competitor, as a warrior, as a champion, too, and, you know, I’ve beaten Sean, too. You know, like we’ve been on the same place and the same thing. And so, it’s not a matter of disrespect. Just don’t disrespect me.”

Advertisement

Sean Payton and Russell Wilson of the Denver Broncos during an a game against the Minnesota Vikings at Empower Field at Mile High Nov. 19, 2023, in Denver, Colo. (Ryan Kang/Getty Images)

After a rocky one-year stint with the Pittsburgh Steelers in 2024, Wilson joined the New York Giants last offseason. However, he was relegated to a backup role after just three games.

Rookie Jaxson Dart quickly showed promise once he had the chance to start, but his season was briefly derailed by injury. Jameis Winston — not Wilson — stepped in for Dart in a handful of games. Dart threw three touchdowns in a Week 7 matchup with the Broncos, nearly pulling off an upset in what was eventually a close loss.

After the game, Payton said Dart provided a “spark” to the Giants’ offense.

“I was talking to [Giants owner] John Mara not too long ago, and I said, ‘We were hoping that that change would have happened long after our game,’” Payton said.

Advertisement

The New York Giants’ Russell Wilson attempts to escape a sack by Dallas Cowboys defensive end James Houston (53) in the first half of a game Sept. 14, 2025, in Arlington, Texas.  (AP Photo/Julio Cortez)

Payton also said the Broncos would have faced less of a challenge had Wilson been under center.

“Classless … but not surprised,” Wilson responded in a social media post. “Didn’t realize you’re still bounty hunting 15+ years later though the media.”

Despite last season’s struggles and chatter about his football future, Wilson does not appear ready to call it quits in 2026.

Advertisement

“I wanna play a few more years for sure,” he said. “I think, for me, I’ve always had the vision of getting to 40, at least. I think the game is different. Quarterbacks, we get hit. It’s not, you know, we get hit hard, but … there’s certain rules. I mean, back in the day when I started, bro, it was you just get [clobbered]. 

“I mean, so I feel like the game allows you to, you know, live a little longer, I guess. I feel healthy. I feel great. But I think, more than anything else is, do you love the game? Do you love studying? Do you love the passion for it all? Do you love the process? Do you love the practice? Do you love — everybody loves the winning part of it, but it’s process. There’s a journey that you got to be obsessed with. And that part I’m obsessed with.”

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Related Article

Russell Wilson not thinking about retirement, plans to play in 2026: 'I know what I'm capable of'

Continue Reading

Sports

Fatigue a factor as early matches begin at Indian Wells

Published

on

Fatigue a factor as early matches begin at Indian Wells

The early rounds of the BNP Paribas Open began Wednesday, with top seeds slated to start play Friday during the 12-day ATP and WTPA Master 1000 tournament.

A busy stretch of the tennis season reaches another gear at Indian Wells Tennis Garden, the second largest outdoor tennis stadium in the world.

While many consider it the “fifth Grand Slam” because of its elite player field, amenities and equal prize money for men and women, professionals acknowledge the tournament is part of a stressful stretch on the tennis calendar.

Indian Wells is followed by the Miami Open, another two-week Master 1000 tournament. The tour stops are known as the “Sunshine Double.”

Some players made the short trip from Indian Wells to Las Vegas this past weekend to participate in the MGM Grand Slam, an exhibition designed to help players ramp up for back-to-back tournaments.

Advertisement

American Reilly Opelka, a 6-foot–11 pro, said managing fatigue after a series of tournaments before hitting Indian Wells has altered his practice and play in exhibition matches, including a loss to 19-year-old Brazilian Joao Fonseca in Las Vegas.

“Normally in any kind of competition, you get excited and play with a pressure point … but you don’t feel this when you are practicing,” Opelka said.

“I was trying to feel like this a few days ago while practicing with … [Tommy Paul,] but instead we got tired and hungry. … That usually doesn’t happen. We just decided to stop and go to eat somewhere.”

Paul said despite the decision to cut practice short, he feels fresh for the upcoming events.

“I started the year pretty well and for Americans, we are excited for the Sunshine Double,” Paul said.

Advertisement

Casper Rudd lost to Opelka during the first round of the Las Vegas exhibition. The Norwegian also lost a week ago during the first round of the Acapulco Open, falling to Chinese qualifier Yibing Wu in straight sets.

Rudd said he felt “extremely tired” after the Australian Open in January.

Rancho Palo Verdes resident Taylor Fritz, ranked No. 7 in the world, said the best way to prepare yourself for grueling tour schedule is “putting [in] the time, work and repetition.”

“… Be there, be focused on the quality that you are doing,” said Fritz, a 28-year-old who won the Indian Wells title in 2022.

While some players are guarding against burnout, others struggled to even reach California. Some players who live in Dubai, including Russians Daniil Medvedev and Andrey Rublev, have to contend with closed airspace triggered by the U.S. and Israel bombing Iran.

Advertisement

The ATP announced Wednesday that, “the vast majority of players who were in Dubai have successfully departed today on selected flights.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Law firm fighting for women’s sports in SCOTUS battle comments on ruling possibly impacting SJSU trans lawsuit

Published

on

Law firm fighting for women’s sports in SCOTUS battle comments on ruling possibly impacting SJSU trans lawsuit

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A law firm leading the charge in the ongoing Supreme Court case over trans athletes in women’s sports has responded after a federal judge suggested the case’s ruling could impact a separate case involving a similar issue. 

Colorado District Judge Kato Crews deferred ruling in motions to dismiss former San Jose State volleyball co-captain Brooke Slusser’s lawsuit against the California State University (CSU) system until after a ruling in the B.P.J. v. West Virginia Supreme Court case, which is expected to come in June. 

Slusser filed the lawsuit against representatives of her school and the Mountain West Conference in fall 2024 after she allegedly was made to share bedrooms and changing spaces with trans teammate Blaire Fleming for a whole season without being informed that Fleming is a biological male. 

 

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the B.P.J. case went to the Supreme Court after a trans teen sued West Virginia to block the state’s law that prevents males from competing in girls’ high school sports. 

The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) is the primary law firm defending West Virginia in that case at the Supreme Court, and has now responded to news that Slusser’s lawsuit could be affected by the SCOTUS ruling. 

“We hope the ruling from the Supreme Court will affirm that Title IX was designed to guarantee equal opportunity for women, not to let male athletes displace women and girl in competition. It is crucial that sports be separated by sex for not only the equal opportunity of women but for safety and privacy. Title IX should protect women’s right to compete in their own sports. Allowing men to compete in the female category reverses 50 years of advancement for women,” ADF Vice President of Litigation Strategies Jonathan Scruggs said.

Slusser’s attorney, Bill Bock of the Independent Council on Women’s Sports, expects a Supreme Court ruling in favor of the legal defense representing West Virginia, thus helping his case. 

(Left) Brooke Slusser (10) of the San Jose State Spartans serves the ball during the first set against the Air Force Falcons at Falcon Court at East Gym in Colorado Springs, Colorado, on Oct. 19, 2024. (Right) Blaire Fleming #3 of the San Jose State Spartans looks on during the third set against the Air Force Falcons at Falcon Court at East Gym on October 19, 2024 in Colorado Springs, Colorado. ( Andrew Wevers/Getty Images; Andrew Wevers/Getty Images)

Advertisement

“We’re looking forward to the case going forward,” Bock told Fox News Digital. 

“I believe that the court is going to find that Title IX operates on the basis of biological sex, without regard to an assumed or professed gender, and so just like the congress and the members of congress that passed Title IX in 1972, allowed this specifically provided for in the regulations that there had to be separate men’s and women’s teams based on biological sex, I think the court is going to see that is the original meaning of the statute and apply it in that way, and I think it’s going to be a big win in women’s sports.”

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority appeared prepared to rule in favor of West Virginia after oral arguments on Jan. 13. 

Slusser spoke on the steps of the Supreme Court on Jan. 13 while oral arguments took place inside, sharing her experience with a divided crowd of opposing protesters. 

With Fleming on its roster, SJSU reached the 2024 conference final by virtue of a forfeit by Boise State in the semifinal round. SJSU lost in the final to Colorado State.

Advertisement

Slusser went on to develop an eating disorder due to the anxiety and trauma from the scandal and dropped out of her classes the following semester. The eating disorder became so severe, that Slusser said she lost her menstrual cycle for nine months. Her decision to drop her classes resulted in the loss of her scholarship, and her parents said they had to foot the bill out of pocket for an unfinished final semester of college. 

President Donald Trump’s Department of Education determined in January that SJSU violated Title IX in its handling of the situation involving Fleming, and has given the university an ultimatum to agree to a series of resolutions or face a referral to the Department of Justice. 

Among the department’s findings, it determined that a female athlete discovered that the trans student allegedly conspired to have a member of an opposing team spike her in the face during a match. ED claims that “SJSU did not investigate the conspiracy, but later subjected the female athlete to a Title IX complaint for ‘misgendering’ the male athlete in online videos and interviews.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

SJSU trans player Blaire Fleming and teammate Brooke Slusser went to a magic show and had Thanksgiving together in Las Vegas despite an ongoing lawsuit over Fleming being transgender. (Thien-An Truong/San Jose State Athletics)

Advertisement

SJSU Athletic Director Jeff Konya told Fox News Digital in a July interview that he was satisfied with how the university handled the situation involving Fleming.

“I think everybody acted in the best possible way they could, given the circumstances,” Konya said. 

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Related Article

'Horrible' moments exposed for UNR volleyball players when they were roped into the SJSU Title IX scandal

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending