Connect with us

Northeast

Trump hush money trial: Meet the jurors who will hear Bragg's case against the 2024 presidential candidate

Published

on

Trump hush money trial: Meet the jurors who will hear Bragg's case against the 2024 presidential candidate

Twelve jurors have been selected and sworn in to serve on the jury for former President Donald Trump’s historic and unprecedented first criminal trial. 

Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has been charged by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg with 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. The charges are related to alleged hush money payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 presidential election. 

TRUMP SAYS CRIMINAL TRIAL IS HAVING A ‘REVERSE EFFECT,’ AS HE CAMPAIGNS AT NEW YORK BODEGA, VOWS TO SAVE CITY

Trump has pleaded not guilty to all counts. He has blasted the trial as pure politics, a “political persecution” and maintains his innocence. The former president is expected to testify during his trial. 

A court sketch depicts the second day of former President Donald Trump’s criminal trial in Manhattan Criminal Court on Tuesday. (Christine Cornell)

Advertisement

By the end of jury selection on Thursday, the third day of jury selection, 12 jurors had been selected and sworn in. The jury pool so far includes four men and three women, all living in New York City. Their professions included work in law, finance, technology and more. 

BRAGG FILES MOTION TO HOLD TRUMP IN CONTEMPT FOR ALLEGED GAG ORDER VIOLATIONS, THREATENS 30 DAYS OF JAIL TIME

“We have our jury,” Judge Juan Merchan said when the 12th juror was picked Thursday afternoon. “Let’s pick our alternates.”

Merchan dismissed the remaining prospective jurors and asked that they return to court Friday so that alternate jurors could be selected. 

Former President Donald Trump awaits the start of proceedings on the second day of jury selection at Manhattan criminal court in New York on Tuesday. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer, Pool)

Advertisement

Here is a look at each of the jurors so far. 

Juror #1 and the foreperson

Juror #1 lives in New York City. He has no children and enjoys doing anything outdoorsy. He gets his news from The New York Times, Daily Mail, Fox News and MSNBC. 

When asked by Trump defense attorney Todd Blanche if he was aware Trump is charged in other cases and jurisdictions, and how that affects him, the man said, “I don’t have an opinion.” 

Juror #2 

Juror #2 is a man who said he follows Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen on “X,” formerly known as Twitter, as well as other “right wing” accounts, including former Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway. 

The reason, he said, he follows those figures was so he could be plugged in to “anything that might move the markets I might need to know about.” 

Advertisement

When asked if he would unfollow Cohen, as he may be a witness in the trial, the man said: “Absolutely.”

The man also said he has “not seen any evidence” relating to the case. 

“I will try to keep an open mind,” he said. 

Responding to questions from Trump lawyer Susan Necheles about his feelings about the former president, the man said that Trump has done some good for the country. 

“It’s ambivalent,” he said. “It goes both ways.” 

Advertisement

The first person who was labeled juror #2 was excused Thursday morning after saying she could not be a fair juror. 

Juror #3

Juror #3 is a young to middle-aged man who lives in Manhattan. The man said he grew up in Oregon and has been an attorney for five years practicing corporate law. The man said he enjoys hiking and running, and gets his news from The New York Times and Google.

Juror #4 

Juror #4 is originally from California, but has lived in New York City for 15 years. The man said he has been a security engineer for 25 years and holds a high school diploma, with some college education. 

The man is married with three children. His wife is a teacher. 

During his spare time, he enjoys being with his children, woodworking and metal working. 

Advertisement

The man said he has served on a jury before — on both a grand jury and a jury in a criminal trial. 

The man said he gets his news from “a smattering” of news sources. As for social media, he said he doesn’t use it. 

Former President Donald Trump appears in Manhattan criminal court in New York City on Monday. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

The man said he has a relative who works in finance and brothers-in-law that work as lawyers. 

The man said he has no feelings about how Trump is being treated in this case. 

Advertisement

TRUMP HUSH MONEY TRIAL: JUROR EXCUSED AFTER SAYING SHE DOES NOT THINK SHE CAN BE FAIR

The person who was first labeled as Juror #4 was excused Thursday morning after it was revealed that he had been previously arrested in Westchester, New York, for tearing down right-wing political advertisements.

Juror #5

Juror #5 is a young and a New York native who has been a teacher of English Language Arts for eight years. 

The woman was previously a caseworker at a juvenile detention center. She said she has a masters’ degree in education. 

“I’m creative at heart,” she said, adding that she enjoys photography. 

Advertisement

The woman said that she is not married and does not have children. Her mother was an administrative aide for a police department, and her godfather was a homicide detective. 

The woman said she gets her news from Google and TikTok. 

She was asked if Trump chose not to testify, whether she would hold that against him. 

“I won’t hold that against him,” she said. 

Former President Donald Trump appears with his legal team Todd Blanche, left, and Emil Bove ahead of the start of jury selection at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York City on Monday. (Jabin Botsford-Pool/Getty Images)

Advertisement

She explained that she has friends who have strong opinions on the former president but said she is not a political person and tries to avoid political conversations. 

She did say, however, that she appreciates Trump’s candor. 

“President Trump speaks his mind, and I’d rather that than someone who’s in office who you don’t know what they’re thinking,” she said. 

When jurors were asked if they were aware Trump was charged in other cases than Bragg’s, most jurors were. However, juror #5 raised her hand to indicate that she was learning of additional charges for the first time. 

Former President Donald Trump appears in Manhattan criminal court in New York City on Tuesday. Trump’s first criminal trial got off to a plodding start on Monday, with the proceedings stalling over disagreements about evidence and other last-minute arguments, leaving even the former president looking bored and resting his eyes at times. (Justin Lane/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Advertisement

Juror #6

Juror #6 is a young woman who lives in Manhattan. She described herself as a New Yorker. 

The woman is a software engineer and said she likes to dance. 

Juror #7

Juror #7 is originally from North Carolina and works as an attorney and civil litigator. 

The man said he is married with two children, and his wife works in risk management for a bank. He said he enjoys spending time outdoors and with his family. 

The man said he gets his news from The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, the New York Post and The Washington Post. 

Advertisement

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg arrives at Manhattan criminal court in New York on Tuesday. (AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura)

When asked if his career as a lawyer would impact his ability to serve fair and impartially, or whether his opinions would get in his way, the man said that he does have “political views as to the Trump presidency” and said there were likely Trump administration policies he disagreed with. 

“I don’t know the man and I don’t have any opinions about him personally,” he said. 

As for his career as a lawyer, he said he does not have any opinions about Trump’s character. 

“I certainly follow the news,” he said. “I’m aware there are other lawsuits out there. But I’m not sure that I know anyone’s character.” 

Advertisement

Juror #8 

Juror #8 is a man who lives on the Upper East Side, and has since 1980. The man is originally from Lebanon. He said he is retired, bu had worked for a major financial firm as a wealth manager. He said he currently consults and holds a Masters of Business Administration. 

The man said he is married with two children–a son and a daughter. He said he enjoys skiing, yoga, meditation, and does not participate in any organizations. 

The man said he has served on a jury, but said the case was held before the trial began. 

The man said he reads The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, CNBC, BBC, and said he does not listen to talk radio. 

The man said he does not have any friends who are victims of crime. He also said he has many friends in the financial field and said his brother is an attorney. 

Advertisement

The man said he can be a fair and impartial juror. He also said he does not have any opinions or beliefs about Trump that would prevent him from being fair or impartial.

Juror #9 

Juror #9 is a woman who lives in Manhattan. She is originally from New Jersey and works as a speech therapist. 

The woman is not married and does not have children. She said she likes to spend time with friends, go to restaurants and go on walks. 

The woman said she has never served on a jury before, and does not watch the news or follow current events too closely. The woman said she did, though, have email subscriptions to CNN and The New York Times. She said she follows social media accounts, listens to podcasts and enjoys reality television. 

The woman said she does not listen to talk radio. 

Advertisement

The woman said she can be fair and impartial. She said she does have opinions about Trump, but said she believes she can put them aside and be fair and impartial. 

Juror #10 

Juror #10 is a man who lives in Manhattan. He was born and raised in Ohio and works in commerce for a large company. The man has a college degree. 

The man said he is not married and has no children, but lives with another adult who works in accounting. 

The man said he enjoys being outdoors and loves animals. 

The man said he does not really follow the news, but listens to podcasts on behavioral psychology. 

Advertisement

The man said he has no strong opinions on how Trump is being treated in this case. 

Juror #11

Juror #11 is a woman who lives in upper Manhattan. The woman is originally from California. She is not married. 

Her hobbies include traveling. 

The woman said that she doesn’t really follow the news, but does watch late night news. 

The woman said that her apartment has been robbed before. 

Advertisement

She says she can be fair and impartial. 

Juror #12 

Juror #12 is a woman living on Manhattan’s Upper East Side. She previously lived in South Carolina and North Carolina. 

The woman is a physical therapist for 15 years and holds both a Bachelors and Doctorate degree. She is married and does not have children. Her husband is a coach for a professional sports team. 

The woman said she enjoys running, playing tennis, and listening to live music. 

The woman said she reads The New York Times, USA Today, and CNN. She said she listens to podcasts related to sports and faith. 

Advertisement

She said she has two brother-in-laws and three sister-in-laws who are attorneys, but said none of them practice criminal law. 

She said she can be fair and impartial. 

Fox News’ Grace Taggart contributed to this report. 

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Maine could face $50M in penalties from federal food assistance policy changes

Published

on

Maine could face M in penalties from federal food assistance policy changes


Maine could face up to $50 million in penalties next year due to errors in its payments for federal food benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Newly released data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture find that Maine’s error rate last year was nearly 11%, the bulk of which were overpayments. That’s in line with the U.S. average. But starting in October of next year, states with error rates above 6% must cover a portion of the SNAP benefits.

Anna Korsen, executive director of Full Plates, Full Potential, said the overpayments aren’t fraud — they’re human error. She said this new cost-shifting policy enacted last year under the Trump administration further complicates the SNAP application process.

“Instead, we could make this program more accessible and more efficient,” Korsen said. “And that would reduce the number of errors and also ensure that Mainers who are eligible for SNAP have access to it.”

Advertisement

She’s urging Congress to delay or reverse the policy under the farm bill that’s currently under consideration.

Maine’s Department of Health and Human Services said it’s taking steps to reduce the error rate, including modernizing its systems and hiring an additional 40 eligibility specialists.

This story appears through a media partnership with Maine Public.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Who will take care of our older and disabled people? – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Who will take care of our older and disabled people? – The Boston Globe


Write to us at startingpoint@globe.com. To subscribe, sign up here.


I’ve been writing for years about immigrants filling jobs that Americans don’t want. Haitians in particular have stepped into the void where the work is hard and the pay is low – cleaning, groundskeeping, preparing food, caring for elderly and developmentally disabled people.

When an influx of migrants flooded into the United States a few years ago, a number of savvy Massachusetts employers opened their doors to them. Thrive Support and Advocacy, a developmental disabilities provider in Marlborough, hired 41 newly arrived Haitians, filling all its full-time direct-care jobs for the first time in a decade.

With the Supreme Court last week siding with the Trump administration’s attempts to end Temporary Protected Status for Syrians and Haitians as part of its continued immigration crackdown, Massachusetts stands to lose 10,000 Haitian TPS holders in the workforce. A decision on Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship, which grants automatic citizenship to nearly everyone born on US soil, is expected today.

Advertisement

But it isn’t just a numbers game. Employers continually cite Haitian migrants’ loyalty, hard work, and devotion to the people they’re helping — many of them elderly. Not to mention the ripple effects of losing these valued employees as the aging population skyrockets.

“At some point, many people will be rehab patients,” Adam Scott, CEO of Hebrew SeniorLife told me. “At some point, many people will be long-term care patients. And this impacts all of them.”

When the TPS ruling is implemented, 10,000 Massachusetts residents will be out of a job and expected to leave the country. But many of them have nowhere to go. A pharmacy tech I’ve been talking to over the past few months knew this day was coming, and she has a detailed plan in place that will allow her 14-year-old US-born son, who has autism, to stay. But she has no plan for herself. She can’t go back to Haiti, where she was kidnapped by gangs as a teenager. So she’s hoping to keep working until her employer tells her she has to go.

To where, though, she doesn’t know.

Advertisement

Read: Who will care for the elderly and developmentally disabled?

Also: More than 100 Venezuelans deported from the United States just hours before the deadly earthquakes are missing. Seven children were among the group, which was taken to a hotel that was destroyed in the quake. (AP)


🧩 6 Across: Bookstore category | ☀️ 88° Hotter Wed.


Paraguay players celebrate with goalkeeper Orlando Gill, right, after winning their World Cup match against Germany.Charles Krupa/AP Photo/Charles Krupa

World Cup: Can the US soccer team beat a European national team for the first time in 11 matches and make it into the Group of 16? We’ll know tomorrow night. In a thrilling upset, Paraguay sent four-time champion Germany home at Foxborough.

Five in a row: Don’t get too excited yet, but the Red Sox followed their four-game sweep of the Yankees with a 6-3 victory over the Nationals last night. They were led by Wilton Contreras, who has been struggling with the news of the deadly earthquakes in his native Venezuela.

Advertisement

Cannabis rollback: If Mass. voters repeal marijuana legalization, would that put you in danger of being arrested? We answer your questions here.

Heat wave: An Extreme Heat Watch has been declared for Wednesday through the Fourth of July. Here’s how hot it will get.

Wellesley killing: The 24-year-old man charged with fatally stabbing his father had suffered serious mental health issues and battled “to contain his demons,” family friends say.

Hiya, neighbor! Cambridge wants to build “social housing.” What is it?

What now? More people are surviving cancer than ever before. Now health providers are helping people navigate the next step.

Advertisement

Duck Boat accident: Questions about equipment quality and decision-making are being raised about the accident Saturday that injured 11 people when the craft flipped in East Cambridge.

Beaches, shellfish areas closed: A sewer line break in Haverhill dumped millions of gallons of wasterwater into the Merrimack River.

He’s No. 1: Yes, but what made AJ Dybantsa the NBA’s top pick? He’s the exact type of player NBA teams are looking for.


By David Beard

Taylor Ortega and Dan Levy in “Big Mistakes.”Spencer Pazer/Netflix/Spencer Pazer/Netflix © 2025

📺 Best TV so far: A whip-smart Italian import. A New England horror comedy. A gay Lutheran minister and his sister stumble across a criminal. Check out our faves.

🏰 Home of the Week: Hail, Victorian! Brookline’s regal Webber-Bouve Mansion has hit the market for $4.3 million. Take a peek. Plus, see the 1976 home for sale that has a Revolutionary War touch.

Advertisement

🍕 Riverside eats: Years in the making, the $24 million Esplanade pavilion project with a café nears the finish line.

🎻 Music as a focusing tool: The jury is out on whether music helps you study or work better or takes away focus, However, instrumental music may help more than those jumping lyrical workout tunes. (The Conversation)

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Tartan adventure: A Globe reporter went to Scotland to find family history, Highland culture — and a wee dram of whisky.


Thanks for reading Starting Point.

This newsletter was edited by David Beard and produced by Ryan Orlecki.

Advertisement

❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at startingpoint@globe.com.

✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can sign up for your own copy.

📬 Delivered Monday through Friday.


Katie Johnston can be reached at katie.johnston@globe.com. Follow her @ktkjohnston.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Declassified Pentagon UFO files detail mysterious 1947 incident in New Hampshire

Published

on

Declassified Pentagon UFO files detail mysterious 1947 incident in New Hampshire


The Pentagon released over a hundred newly declassified files related to UFOs (now officially referred to as Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, or UAP) last month, including a handful of pages and memos about mysterious, flaming metal fragments that landed in a field in West Rindge, New Hampshire, in 1947, and the classified investigation that followed.

This is the story NHPR has pieced together from the incident summary sheet and official communications and memos from the Boston FBI Field Office to the director of the FBI.

A porchside discovery

Advertisement

At 3 p.m. on July 7, 1947, retiree Charles. N. Tasker was sitting on Earl Whitehead’s porch in West Rindge when he observed “little curls of smoke, which on inspection disclosed small burned spots about one and one half inches in diameter on the green lawn,” according to a now-declassified report from the FBI.

Nearby, on Route 202, “several little blazes had started” in the long dry grass on both sides of the road, creating a circle about 200 feet in diameter that seemed to be caused by small metallic fragments.

Tasker called the local fire department to extinguish the small fires while a fellow observer, a “Mr. Appel,” gave the metallic fragments to researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to study, where Dr. John W. Bunker, dean of the graduate school, led the research team and reported the findings to the Boston FBI field office.

Route 202 as it runs through the town of Rindge, N.H. (Mara Hoplamazian/NHPR)

The examination

Advertisement

The first step in studying the metallic fragments was to identify what they were made of. Using a spectrograph, which studies light waves to determine the material composition of objects, scientists at MIT found the metallic fragments were ordinary iron that had been “subjected to terrific heat,” which caused scales to form and thus created cast iron.

Where did the iron fragments come from?

Given that Tasker found the metal pieces in the grass about 700 feet from a railroad track, the researchers hypothesized that the fragments could be from the liner in a smoke stack or some other part of a steam engine. However, further testing ruled out that theory.

If not a train . . . then a plane?

Advertisement

One metallurgist at MIT speculated that the fragments could be the lining from a jet turbo plane.

But another scientist was unsure that the fragments were from an airplane, because if the fragments came from something at high altitude, most of the heat would have left by the time they reached the ground, meaning they wouldn’t be able to start the fires in the grass that Tasker observed.

And yet, if the iron fragments had originally been part of a larger object that fell a great height, this large iron object could have retained enough heat to start a fire, and probably would have smashed into smaller pieces upon striking the ground.

The scientists attempted to reconstruct this hypothetical larger object from the metallic fragments, finding they had most likely been part of one hollow cylinder that was 8 inches in diameter, 3/16th inches thick, and made using machinery.

Professor J. Francis Reintjes, an assistant professor in electrical engineering at MIT, (referred to as “Rentges” in the reports), thought the metallic fragments looked similar to the lining of V-2 missiles he had observed in New Mexico.

Advertisement

In the late 1940s, the U.S. had been adapting and testing the V-2 missiles designed by Nazi Germany in World War II to study space and the Earth’s atmosphere. The MIT scientists thought that cast iron cylinders of that size had been used during that research. However, the theory wasn’t definitive enough to “conclude to the exclusion of all other possibilities,” according to the final memo written to the director of the FBI.

A point for intelligent life beyond Earth?

Even 80 years ago, extraterrestrial theories floated around.

The American UFO craze had begun on June 24, 1947, when the first “flying saucer” observation was made in the Pacific Northwest. By June 25, the press had picked up an amateur pilot’s report of some “unidentified flying object” that was then referred to as both a “flying saucer” and “flying disk.”

Advertisement

The incident report in West Rindge is from just a few weeks later in July, with the memos to the director of the FBI from later that month. In those memos, there are several handwritten notes, with “FLYING DISCS” written on both of them.

An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947, now declassified by the Pentagon. (U.S. Department of Defense)
An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947, now declassified by the Pentagon. (U.S. Department of Defense)
An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947, now declassified by the Pentagon. (U.S. Department of Defense)
An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947, now declassified by the Pentagon. (U.S. Department of Defense)

But how does this theory hold up today?

“I think it’s great that these documents came out; I don’t know if they are the smoking gun that we wanted them to be,” said Michael Panicello, the New England regional director of the Mutual UFO Network.

Panicello, like the scientist Reintjes at MIT, wondered if the metal was space debris from the V-2 rocket research happening in New Mexico.

But Panicello said this doesn’t make him rule out that the fragments could be a sign of extraterrestrial life.

“I’m not trying to be a debunker. I’m definitely not. I believe in aliens,” Panicello said. “But . . . it’s kind of hard to jump right to the UFO alien connection when you can’t truly rule out man-made objects.”

Advertisement

Fragments of a rocket?

At least one scientist thinks it is unlikely the fragments came from man-made rockets or objects launched into space, simply because of the material of which they are made.

“There would be very little reason to make any sort of space object out of iron because its strength to weight ratio just is not as good as something like aluminum, which is practically what all spacecraft are primarily made out of these days,” said James Clemmons, professor of physics and astronomy at the University of New Hampshire.

Clemmons also found it peculiar that these metal fragments were made of cast iron, as it is not considered very strong.

Advertisement

“To me, cast iron is a very crude thing, and the idea that crude things go into space purposefully is also kind of odd,” Clemmons said.

The V-2 launches took place at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. Jenn Jett, a Museum Specialist at the White Sands Missile Range Museum in New Mexico, said via email that “V-2s being launched at White Sands typically landed within the White Sands boundary within a distance of 100 miles,” with the rare exception of landings in other parts of New Mexico and Juarez, Mexico.

Considering New Hampshire is over 2,000 miles from New Mexico, it would appear there is no way for any rocket debris to get anywhere close.

Furthermore, V-2 rockets were made primarily of steel. While steel’s main ingredient is in fact iron, the initial scientists determined the metal to be made of cast iron, which Clemmons said is very different.

“I would expect that the MIT scientists could distinguish between steel and iron,” Clemmons said.

Advertisement

So if these metal fragments are not from the classified V-2 rockets, nor from the nearby railroad, what could they be?

Might it be a meteorite?

According to NASA, more than 50,000 meteorites have been found on Earth. While most meteorites are stony, metal meteorites made of iron do make it down to the ground on occasion.

However, Richard Binzel, a professor of planetary science at MIT, said the written accounts were “not consistent with meteorites.”

Advertisement

“[Meteorites] do not arrive ‘hot’ when they land and would not spark a fire,” Binzel said. “While there are iron meteorites, their metal composition is distinctive, and the early analysis would have immediately declared the fragments as meteorites.”

An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947. (U.S. Department of Defense)
An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947. (U.S. Department of Defense)
An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947. (U.S. Department of Defense)
An official memo addressed to the Director of the FBI from July 1947. (U.S. Department of Defense)

Where are the fragments now?

The final memo to the director of the FBI in the recently released files stated that “unless advised to the contrary by August 15, 1947, the Boston Office will destroy these specimens. In the interim they will be transmitted to the Bureau on specific Bureau instructions.”

NHPR contacted the Boston Field Office of the FBI to confirm whether the metal fragments had been destroyed. In response, the Boston Field Office said, “At this point in time, we haven’t been able to locate any records responsive to your request.”

This isn’t New Hampshire’s only potential counter with extraterrestrials. In 1961, Portsmouth residents Betty and Barney Hill famously had one of the first alleged UFO abduction encounters in the country, and Exeter has an annual UFO festival revolving around a famed 1965 incident nearby.

Advertisement

As for the mystery metal from West Rindge, theories about rocket debris and meteorites have come up short of solid evidence. For now, no one can conclusively determine the origins of the cast-iron fragments near Route 202. This unidentified anomalous phenomenon remains a mystery left unsolved.


This story is a production of the New England News Collaborative. It was originally published by New Hampshire Public Radio.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending