Connect with us

Fitness

Dan Lloyd: Why I’ve decided to change my lifestyle

Published

on

Dan Lloyd: Why I’ve decided to change my lifestyle

There’s a strong argument to say that this article shouldn’t be here. This is the Global CYCLING Network, and what I’m about to write is not specifically cycling-related. I’m going to write it anyway, and hope it makes it past the Editor-in-Chief (I’ll choose a slow news week).

I’m 43 now, and largely sat on my arse. Unfortunately it’s now on a couch instead of the 20-30 hours a week I used to perch it on a bike saddle. So, instead of buying a Porsche for my mid life crisis, I’ve made a decision to change a few things in my lifestyle. The aims being to stop the deterioration, to attempt to slow down the ageing process that I’ve recently been quite successful in speeding up, and to extend my life expectancy as much as I can. I’m doing it with the hope that I can inspire, or at least encourage, some of you to do it with me.

My attitude towards cycling over the years

Let me at least get some cycling into this. I LOVED riding and racing my bike – I cannot begin to articulate how obsessed I was with being the best I could possibly be. In that regard I am similar to most current or former pros. It’s not a sport you can excel in unless you have that determination and drive.

Unfortunately for me, I didn’t have the genetics to achieve Mathieu van der Poel level success, but fortunately for me, I had enough talent to turn pro, competing at many of the biggest races in the world. That includes the Tour de France in 2010, which I really made the most of – I got to enjoy it for a full four hours more than the (eventual) winner that year, Andy Schleck.

Fast forward two years and I was no longer a full-time cyclist (not my own choice, but probably a wise choice by team managers at that time). I did, however, remain in the ‘industry’. I’ve been here at GCN since its inception, and over the 12 years since, I’ve also had the privilege of doing a lot of commentary and punditry on the biggest races in the world.

Advertisement

In that time, I’ve learnt a lot about myself, and my relationship with cycling and exercise in general. I love talking about cycling, and watching it, but my love for riding a bike ebbed away immediately after I stopped competing. With a goal, I can push myself very hard, without one, I can’t see the point in doing anything.

Read more: GCN takes on Visma-Lease a Bike’s Vingegaard and Kuss in Zwift challenge

It’s interesting to look at how much riding ex-pros do in retirement. At least it is for me. It’s one of my weird fascinations, along with looking up the age of almost every famous person I see on TV (yes, that is weird, and no, I don’t know why). There’s very rarely any middle ground on this; Frank and Andy Schleck are good examples. Whilst Frank continued to ride more than 15,000km a year in retirement, Andy hung up his wheels and only started riding again quite recently. Most ex-pros either carry on riding a lot or don’t do much at all.

Having thought long and hard about the reasons behind this disparity, my conclusion is that it comes down to why you rode a bike in the first place.

For me, I loved the process of being the best I could be for competition – I loved making a training plan, and I loved sticking to it, ticking the boxes. There have been very few times in my life where I’ve just gone out for a bike ride for the sole reason that I wanted to go out and enjoy a bike ride. Each one had an aim and a plan.

Advertisement

That’s not the same for everyone, though – others just love riding their bikes, but happen to be amongst the most talented cyclists in the world, and end up making a career out of it. I’m not saying they don’t also follow training plans and tick boxes, but their love for riding remains with them even after they’re no longer paid.

That was a very long-winded way of explaining why I haven’t ridden my bike much for the last 12 years. My pro career was another box ticked – I may not have reached the heady heights of a big win, but I got further than I thought I would.

The one time I did get back into some serious riding was when I became obsessed with taking the Strava KOM around a local singletrack trail. It took me about six months to get it, after which I stopped cycling again. Sad, I know. I’ve also dabbled with running, which was great – I had no history with running, so I could be the best runner I’d ever been. I was back to ticking boxes… until I got injured.

So what happens next?

Long story short (maybe long story long by this point), I’ve not done a whole lot of consistent exercise over the last 12 years. What I have done a lot of is working, sitting, drinking alcohol, burning the candle at both ends, and… smoking. I’ve not admitted that last part publicly before. Mainly because it’s embarrassing that I did something so stupid for so long, but I smoked a fair bit between 2012 and 2020, before I finally managed to give up. At least the tobacco part – to this day I am using nicotine replacements.

It was late last year when I realised that I was on a slippery slope. My Whoop – who are sponsoring this series of videos – sleep scores during our Grand Tour coverage in particular were enough to make me want to change. Terrible sleep, an HRV barely in double digits, and a resting HR 10-15 beats higher than it would be without drinking.

Advertisement

At that same time, I’d been listening to a lot of podcasts and reading a lot of books on longevity, and all the small things you can do to give yourself the best chance of a very long and healthy life. It’s now time to start implementing some of the things I’ve learned.

And that’s what I am going to document in a new series on the GCN YouTube channel and here on our website. The initial episode (which you can watch at the top of this page) goes through some thorough baseline tests which I was fortunate enough to do at the Nuffield Manchester Institute of Health and Performance. I will repeat those tests towards the end of this year, having made several small but significant changes to my lifestyle. Namely more exercise, better sleep, less drinking (I’m not confident I want to, or even could, completely cut alcohol out of my life), and an emphasis on generally healthier living.

I’m sure there are many people out there, reading this or watching the series, who also have some small things that they’d like to change about their lifestyle for the better, or maybe you just want to learn exactly what you can do to try and ensure you live the longest, healthiest life possible. That’s what this is all about – not living like a monk, or trying to make the perfect choices all day every day, but small changes that we can all implement if we really want to.

The end goal? A longer life, a happier life, and a healthier life. Yep, all the clichés, but I genuinely think that I, and we, can achieve it.

You can keep up to date with Dan’s progress here on the GCN website and over on the GCN YouTube channel. Let us know in the comments below if Dan’s inspired you to make some lifestyle adjustments. We’d love to hear your stories too.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Fitness

How the 3-3-3 Rule Helped Me Stick to an Exercise Routine

Published

on

How the 3-3-3 Rule Helped Me Stick to an Exercise Routine

If you’ve ever started a new workout routine with the best intentions only to find yourself skipping sessions by week two, you’re not alone. I’m the type to get trapped in the same cycle of burnout, where I go hard for a couple of weeks, feel exhausted, feel guilty, and repeat. For me, what finally broke that cycle wasn’t a new gym membership or a fancy fitness app, but a simple scheduling hack: the “3-3-3 rule.” I’d seen this rule applied it to general productivity, and all the same principles can apply to your fitness habits, too. Here’s how you can use the 3-3-3 rules to structure your workouts and create a habit that sticks.

What is the 3-3-3 rule?

The 3-3-3 “rule” (or “method,” or “gentle suggestion”) is essentially a weekly workout framework built around three types of movement, each done three times per week:

  • Three strength training sessions. This includes lifting weights, bodyweight circuits, resistance bands, whatever builds muscle and challenges your body.

  • Three cardio sessions. This includes running, cycling, swimming, jump rope, a dance class—what counts as “cardio” is up for debate, but here, I think of it as anything that gets your heart pumping.

  • Three active recovery days. This includes light walking, yoga, stretching, foam rolling, and so on.

And yes, I realize this math adds up to nine intentional days of movement across a seven-day week. Here’s the thing: You do double duty some days, or skip workouts here and there, or adjust to a nine-day cycle, because the point isn’t rigid scheduling. The point is rhythm over a strict structure. For me, the 3-3-3 rule provides a sense of momentum that’s flexible enough to fit into real life, but consistent enough to actually stick to.

Why the 3-3-3 rule works for me

Before I get into how the 3-3-3 rule helped me specifically, let’s talk about why so many workout plans fall apart in the first place. I believe most of them make two classic mistakes. The first is doing too much, too soon. You go from zero to six days a week at the gym, you get burnt out, and the whole thing unravels. The second mistake is having no real structure at all—just vague intentions, like “I’ll work out when I can,” which never materializes into anything real for a lot of people.

For me, the 3-3-3 rule solves both of those problems. It gives me enough structure to build habit and momentum, but not so much intensity that my body and brain feel overwhelmed. I personally adore running, but I struggle to motivate myself to lift weights; the 3-3-3 rhythm here helped me find a middle ground between those two workouts. When I know I have three strength sessions to hit in a week (or nine-ish day cycle), I can look at my calendar and find three slots without too much drama or dread.

Advertisement

There’s also plenty of breathing room built into the plan, which was the biggest game changer for me. I used to have the (toxic) thought that my rest days were wasted days, which is a mentality that led to either overtraining or complete inactivity with pretty much no middle ground.

Plus, there’s something psychologically satisfying about the number three. I know and love the rule of threes in photography, comedy, survival tips, and all over the place.

How to make a 3-3-3 workout schedule work for you

The 3-3-3 rule has a ton of wiggle room for customization. Here are some ideas for how you can approach it:


What do you think so far?

For strength days, pick a format you actually enjoy. That might be a full-body circuit, a push/pull/legs split, or a class at your gym. (Boxing, anyone?) Your focus on these days should be a progressive challenge—push yourself, yes, but don’t obliterate yourself.

Advertisement

For cardio days, variety helps. Mix a longer, easier effort with a shorter, more intense session (like a 20-minute interval run). I know I’m biased, but cardio really shouldn’t feel like punishment.

For recovery days, resist the urge to “make them count” by sneaking in extra work. The whole point is to let your body consolidate the gains from your harder days. Walk, stretch, breathe, and trust the process.

Another practical tip: Pick a night to map out your 3-3-3 week ahead of time. You’ll probably find that the week arranges itself pretty naturally once you’re looking for those nine windows.

The bottom line

As always, consistency should always be your priority in fitness. If you’ve been struggling to find a rhythm, if your past workout plans have always fizzled out around week three, give the 3-3-3 rule an honest four-week try. Maybe start with a 1-1-1 month! After all, the 3-3-3 rule isn’t a hack to totally transform your physique, but I do think it can provide something way more valuable. Finding a routine that works for you—like the 3-3-3 rule works for me—is the first step to make exercise a reliable, sustainable part of your life.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Fitness

I’m a running coach — I’ve just tested shoes actually designed for women’s feet, and they’re a total game changer

Published

on

I’m a running coach — I’ve just tested shoes actually designed for women’s feet, and they’re a total game changer

Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

QLVR ENDVR: Two minute review

Most running shoes feel familiar for a reason: the formula has barely changed in millennia. We have archaeological evidence of shoes being fastened with “shoelaces” as far back as around 3,500 BC, yet the basic lace-up running trainer remains the default.

QLVR (pronounced “clever”) set out to challenge that. Its debut shoe, the ENDVR, is a laceless “running slipper” built around a women-specific mechanical structure, with a slip-on Wing Fit system inspired by the way a bird’s wing opens and closes around movement.

Continue Reading

Fitness

Mere minutes of daily vigorous exercise can cut your risk of 8 diseases | CNN

Published

on

Mere minutes of daily vigorous exercise can cut your risk of 8 diseases | CNN

Move more. Sit less. For many years, that’s been accepted guidance for people wanting to get healthier.

Now that message is getting refined, with a growing body of research suggesting that certain types of movements may be more beneficial than others when it comes to health benefits.

The intensity of your exercise may matter as well. A new study published in the European Heart Journal found that a small amount of vigorous activity may be linked to lower risk of eight different chronic diseases.

The findings raise questions about why intensity matters and how people can incorporate more intense exercise routines into everyday life. To better understand the study’s implications, I spoke with CNN wellness expert Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency physician and clinical associate professor at George Washington University. She previously served as Baltimore’s health commissioner.

Before beginning any new exercise program, consult your doctor. Stop immediately if you experience pain.

Advertisement

CNN: What did this study examine about exercise and its relationship to chronic disease?

Dr. Leana Wen: This investigation looked at how the intensity of physical activity is related to the risk of developing a range of chronic diseases. Researchers analyzed data from two very large groups in the UK Biobank, which is a long-term health study in the United Kingdom that tracks medical and lifestyle information from hundreds of thousands of participants. One group included about 96,000 people who wore wrist activity trackers that objectively measured their movement, and the other included more than 375,000 people who self-reported their activity.

The researchers followed participants over an average of about nine years and examined the development of eight conditions: major cardiovascular events, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, immune-related inflammatory diseases, fatty liver disease, chronic respiratory disease, chronic kidney disease and dementia, as well as overall mortality.

The key finding was that the proportion of activity done at vigorous intensity mattered. People who had more than about 4% of their total activity classified as vigorous had substantially lower risks of developing these conditions compared with people who had no vigorous activity at all. The numbers were stunning, with the participants having the following results:


  • 63% lower risk of dementia,

  • 60% lower risk of type 2 diabetes,

  • 48% lower risk of fatty liver disease,

  • 44% lower risk of chronic respiratory disease,

  • 41% lower risk of chronic kidney disease,

  • 39% lower risk of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases,

  • 31% lower risk of major cardiovascular events,

  • 29% lower risk of atrial fibrillation, and

  • 46% lower risk of death from any cause.

These results are amazing. Imagine if someone invented a medication that could reduce the risks of all these diseases at once — it would be very popular! Crucially, even people who exercised a lot still benefited if the proportion of time they spent doing vigorous physical activity was increased. Conversely, people who were relatively inactive also benefited from adding just a little bit of higher-intensity exercise to their daily routines.

CNN: What counts as “vigorous” physical activity?

Advertisement

Wen: Vigorous activity is generally defined as exercise that substantially raises your heart rate and breathing. A simple way to gauge it is the “talk test.” If you can speak comfortably in full sentences while exercising, you are likely in the low to moderate range. If you are so out of breath that you can only say a few words at a time, that is vigorous.

Running, cycling, lap swimming or climbing stairs quickly could count. But this also depends on people’s baseline fitness. For some individuals, taking longer strides with walking can be vigorous exercise. Others who are already fairly fit would need to do more. It’s also important to remember that vigorous activity doesn’t have to be in the context of a structured exercise plan. Short bursts of effort in daily life, such as rushing to catch a bus or carrying heavy groceries upstairs, can also qualify if they raise your heart rate and make you breathless.

CNN: Why might higher intensity exercise provide additional health benefits?

Wen: Higher intensity activity places greater demands on the body in a shorter period. This type of movement can improve cardiovascular fitness, increase insulin sensitivity and support metabolic health more efficiently than lower-intensity activity alone. Some studies have also linked vigorous activity with cognitive benefits.

Greater intensity may have distinct benefits across different organ systems. The researchers found that some conditions, such as immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, appeared to be more strongly linked to the intensity of activity than to the total amount. On the other hand, type 2 diabetes and kidney disease were influenced by both how much activity people did and how intense it was. Why this is the case is not yet known, but intensity appears to have a significant impact across diseases affecting multiple organs.

Advertisement

CNN: How much vigorous activity do people need?

Wen: The threshold for people seeing a benefit appears to be relatively low. The researchers found that once people reached more than about 4% of their total activity as vigorous, their risk of developing chronic diseases dropped substantially.

To put that into practical terms, we are not talking about professional athletes dedicating their lives to hours of high-intensity training. Everyday people may see benefits from just doing a few minutes of vigorous effort daily.

CNN: How can people realistically incorporate vigorous activity into their daily routines?

Wen: One helpful way to think practically is that vigorous activity does not have to happen all at once. It can be accumulated in short bursts throughout the day.

Advertisement

People can take the stairs instead of the elevator and do so at a faster pace than usual. When they are heading to work, they can add some speed walking. They can park farther away when grocery shopping and walk briskly while carrying groceries.

Structured exercise also can incorporate intervals where people alternate between moderate and more intense effort. If you’re swimming laps, you can warm up at a more leisurely pace, then do a few laps at a faster pace, then again at a leisurely pace and repeat. This suggestion applies to any other aerobic exercise: Aim for multiple intervals of at least 30 seconds to a minute each where your body is working hard enough that you feel noticeably out of breath.

CNN: What about someone who is older or has mobility issues?

Wen: Not everyone can or should engage in high-intensity activity in the same way. Vigorous activity is relative to that person’s baseline. For someone who is not used to exercise, even a short period of slightly faster walking or standing up repeatedly from a chair could be considered high intensity. And not everyone may be able to walk. In that case, some exercises from the chair can have aerobic benefits.

Individuals who have specific medical conditions should consult with their primary care clinicians before embarking on a new exercise routine. People with mobility issues also may benefit from working with a physical therapist who can help to tailor exercises appropriate to their specific situation.

Advertisement

CNN: What is the key takeaway for people trying to improve their health?

Wen: To me, the main takeaway from this study is that it’s not only how much total exercise you get but also how hard you push yourself that matters. And you don’t have to have a lot of high-intensity exercise: Adding just a little has substantial health benefits across a wide range of chronic health conditions.

At the same time, exercise needs be practical. People should look for opportunities to safely increase intensity in ways that fit their daily lives. The most effective approach to physical activity is a balanced one: Exercise regularly, incorporate more challenging activities when you can and build habits that are sustainable over time.

Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN’s Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending