Connect with us

Michigan

Michigan Senate committee takes up bills to repeal ban on compensated surrogacy agreements

Published

on

Michigan Senate committee takes up bills to repeal ban on compensated surrogacy agreements


play

A Michigan Senate committee heard testimony Thursday on a package of bills aimed at expanding options for assisted reproduction as lawmakers consider a repeal of a decades-old ban on compensated surrogacy for parents who wish to have children, but are unable to carry out a pregnancy themselves.

House Bills 5207-5215 would establish the Fertility Health Care Act, which supporters argue will remove barriers to starting a family through assisted reproduction, like surrogate parenting. Surrogate parenting refers to the process in which a woman will carry a pregnancy and deliver a child for another family. 

Advertisement

Michigan has had a ban on compensated surrogacy parenting since 1988. The process has still taken place in Michigan since then, but parents and advocates for surrogacy parenting say there are legal barriers which make it difficult for many in the state to have children if they are unable to through traditional means.

Previous efforts to repeal the ban have failed, but last November lawmakers in the Michigan House voted along party lines to approve a nine-bill package that would repeal the existing ban and establish the Fertility Health Care Act. If the Senate, which has a 20-18 split among Democrats and Republicans, were to pass the bills this year, they would be poised to advance to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s desk for her signature.

The Senate Committee on Judiciary, Public Safety and Civil Rights on Thursday took testimony from a group that included legal experts, parents whose children were born through surrogacy and medical practitioners who voiced support for the bills; as well as representatives from Right to Life of Michigan and the Michigan Catholic Conference who oppose the legislation.

Tammy Myers, of Grand Rapids, and her husband had their second and third children — a set of twins, born through surrogacy in 2021 — after Myers was diagnosed with breast cancer six years earlier and was no longer able to carry a pregnancy to term. The twins, a boy and a girl, were born earlier than expected — before the Myers could complete the legal process of adopting the children required by Michigan law.

Advertisement

“Despite being their biological parents and having no opposition to the parentage from our carrier and her husband, my husband and I were denied the rightful recognition on the twins birth certificates,” Myers testified.

“In the early hours of their lives, we had no life-saving medical decision-making power for their care.”

It took nearly two years for the Myers to legally adopt the twins. Myers’ attorney, Melissa Neckers, of Grand Rapids, said Michigan’s existing laws don’t match modern fertility health care practices.

“These cases are happening a lot,” Neckers said. “People are entering into surrogacy agreements all the time in Michigan. The technology exists. People are desperate to have babies and the law has not caught up with that.”

Advertisement

More: Troy woman struck by breast cancer finds surrogacy as a path to motherhood

Supporters for the Fertility Health Care Act said Michigan is the only state which currently has a ban on compensated surrogacy agreements.

The bill package does have opponents — Genevieve Marnon, legislative director for anti-abortion organization Right to Life of Michigan, said the state’s current ban on compensated surrogacy agreements prevents the “buying and selling of children.”

Marnon also raised concerns about the proposed legislation eliminating the penalties associated with current law for using minors or developmentally disabled women as surrogates. The bills considered by the committee Thursday require those entering a surrogate agreement to be at least 21-years-old, complete consultations with medical and mental health professionals and have independent legal representation.

“Our current law strikes a good balance between protecting vulnerable women and children while allowing infertile couples options to expand their families,” Marnon said.

Advertisement

Rebecca Mastee, policy advocate for the Michigan Catholic Conference, also testified in opposition of the bills, raising concerns that the package currently doesn’t detail any requirements for the relationship between two individuals seeking to have a child through surrogacy.

House Rep. Samantha Steckloff, D-Farmington Hills, is the lead sponsor of the package. A survivor of breast cancer, Steckloff told the committee of how she delayed the start of chemotherapy by a month in 2015 to go through in-vitro fertilization (IVF), allowing her and her husband to possibly start a family of their own one day.

“Michigan is the only state in the nation with a criminal ban on surrogacy contracts,” Steckloff said. “Driving these arrangements underground only serves to put prospective parents and the children they hope to raise in legal jeopardy. House Bills 5207-5215 lifts this ban, and more importantly creates a clear legal link between parents and their children born through assisted reproduction.”

Steckloff also referenced a recent ruling in Alabama, where the state’s Supreme Court ruled in February that embryos fertilized through IVF are considered “extrauterine children” and legally protected like any other child. Advocates for IVF warn the ruling could restrict access to the practice if legal protections aren’t put in place.

Additional testimony on the package will take place next week, said Sen. Stephanie Chang, D-Detroit, who chairs the committee. It’s possible members could vote on reporting the bills to the full Senate floor then.

Advertisement

Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks, D-Grand Rapids, has voiced support for the legislation, issuing a statement Thursday in which she said: “It is high time our laws evolve to mirror the advances made in assisted reproductive technology, and we are committed to empowering Michiganders to pursue parenthood without unnecessary hurdles.”

Contact Arpan Lobo: alobo@freepress.com. Follow him on X (Twitter) @arpanlobo.

Become a subscriber today.





Source link

Advertisement

Michigan

Big Ten program to hire Alabama QB coach Nick Sheridan as OC

Published

on

Big Ten program to hire Alabama QB coach Nick Sheridan as OC


Michigan State is expected to hire Alabama QBs coach Nick Sheridan as its next offensive coordinator, On3’s Pete Nakos reported. Sheridan also serves as the Crimson Tide’s co-offensive coordinator.

Sheridan arrived at Alabama in 2024 as offensive coordinator and took on co-offensive coordinator duties this season as Ryan Grubb arrived in Tuscaloosa. He previously worked with Kalen DeBoer at Washington as tight ends coach after spending time on the staff at Indiana from 2017-21.

A Michigan alumnus, Sheridan started his coaching career at nearby Saline (Mich.) in 2010. His hire is notable for Pat Fitzgerald as he takes over at Michigan State.

After his season as the quarterbacks coach at Saline, Sheridan broke into college football as a graduate assistant at Western Kentucky in 2011. He then became the pass game coordinator and quarterbacks coach at USF in 2013 before three seasons as a graduate assistant at Tennessee from 2014-16.

Advertisement

In 2017, Sheridan became Indiana’s quarterbacks coach and moved to tight ends coach in 2019, which is when DeBoer joined the staff. He then took over as offensive coordinator from 2020-21 after DeBoer’s departure for Fresno State and joined him at Washington in 2022.

Nick Sheridan would be the latest high-profile hire for Fitzgerald, who’s preparing for his first year at Michigan State. The Spartans are also adding Iowa special teams coordinator LeVar Woods, Hawkeyes coach Kirk Ferentz confirmed. Woods is expected to stay with Iowa through the bowl game before becoming MSU’s special teams coordinator and assistant head coach.

“I know it was a tough decision for him, and it was a really good opportunity for him to consider,” Ferentz told reporters this week. “We’ve had several coaches have that opportunity, as well. Just first and foremost, just want to congratulate him on that and just share a couple words about LeVar.

“He was on the team when I got here in December of ’98 and was a veteran player, one of the good veteran players that we had, and was a really big part of helping try to build this thing when we got started. Obviously a good player but more importantly a real leader and a guy who had helped set tempo and was really responsive to the way we were doing things.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Michigan

Michigan Lottery Daily 3, Daily 4 results for Dec. 19, 2025

Published

on

Michigan Lottery Daily 3, Daily 4 results for Dec. 19, 2025


play

The Michigan Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Dec. 19, 2025, results for each game:

Advertisement

Winning Daily 3 numbers from Dec. 19 drawing

Midday: 4-3-4

Evening: 0-6-0

Check Daily 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Daily 4 numbers from Dec. 19 drawing

Midday: 7-0-1-9

Evening: 1-2-1-7

Advertisement

Check Daily 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Lucky For Life numbers from Dec. 19 drawing

08-13-19-34-48, Lucky Ball: 14

Check Lucky For Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Poker Lotto numbers from Dec. 19 drawing

2C-4C-7C-8C-9C

Check Poker Lotto payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Fantasy 5 numbers from Dec. 19 drawing

14-26-28-30-39

18-20-32-33-37

Check Fantasy 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Daily Keno numbers from Dec. 19 drawing

03-09-11-13-14-27-32-38-39-40-47-51-53-62-66-67-70-72-75-76-77-80

Check Daily Keno payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

All Michigan Lottery retailers can redeem prizes up to $600. For prizes up to $99,999.99, winners have the option to submit their claim by mail or in person at one of Michigan Lottery’s Regional Offices.

To claim by mail, complete a ticket receipt form, sign your winning ticket, and send it along with original copies of your government-issued photo ID and Social Security card to the address below. Ensure the names on your ID and Social Security card match exactly. Claims should be mailed to:

Michigan Lottery

Advertisement

Attn: Claim Center

101 E. Hillsdale

P.O. Box 30023

Lansing, MI 48909

For prizes over $100,000, winners must claim their prize in person at the Michigan Lottery Headquarters in Lansing located at 101 E. Hillsdale in downtown Lansing. Each winner must present original versions of a valid government-issued photo ID (typically a driver’s license or state ID) and a Social Security card, ensuring that the names on both documents match exactly. To schedule an appointment, please call the Lottery Player Relations office at 844-887-6836, option 2.

Advertisement

If you prefer to claim in person at one of the Michigan Lottery Regional Offices for prizes under $100,000, appointments are required. Until further notice, please call 1-844-917-6325 to schedule an appointment. Regional office locations are as follows:

  • Lansing: 101 E. Hillsdale St. Lansing; Phone: 844-917-6325
  • Livonia: 33231 Plymouth Road, Livonia; Phone: 844-917-6325
  • Sterling Heights: 34700 Dequindre Road, Sterling Heights; Phone: 844-917-6325
  • Detroit: Cadillac Place, 3060 W. Grand Blvd., Suite L-600, Detroit; Phone: 844-917-6325
  • Grand Rapids: 3391-B Plainfield Ave. NE, Grand Rapids; Phone: 844-917-6325
  • Saginaw: Jerome T. Hart State Office Building, 411 E. Genesee Ave., Saginaw; Phone: 844-917-6325

For additional information, downloadable forms, and instructions, visit the Michigan Lottery’s prize claim page.

When are Michigan Lottery drawings held?

  • Daily 3 & Daily 4: Midday at 12:59 p.m., Evening at 7:29 p.m.
  • Fantasy 5: 7:29 p.m. daily
  • Poker Lotto: 7:29 p.m. daily
  • Lotto 47: 7:29 p.m. Wednesday and Saturday
  • Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily
  • Daily Keno: 7:29 p.m. daily

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Michigan editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

University of Michigan Regents Who Led the Charge Against Pro-Palestine Protestors Are Now Backing Prosecutor Karen McDonald’s Candidacy for State Attorney

Published

on

University of Michigan Regents Who Led the Charge Against Pro-Palestine Protestors Are Now Backing Prosecutor Karen McDonald’s Candidacy for State Attorney


Drop Site is a reader-funded, independent news outlet. Without your support, we can’t operate. Please consider making a 501(c)(3) tax-deductible donation today.

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators gather for a mock trial against the University of Michigan’s Board of Regents on the university’s campus in Ann Arbor, Michigan, on April 21, 2025. The demonstrators claim for the last 18 months, the president and the regents have proven their allegiance to Israel and their own political interests over the university community. (Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY / AFP) (Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY/AFP via Getty Images)

Article by Tom Perkins

Last year, the pro-Israel regents of University of Michigan (U-M) ignited controversy by recruiting State Attorney General Dana Nessel to crackdown on campus Gaza protesters. Now, members of U-M’s Board of Regents are making large donations to Oakland County Prosecutor Karen McDonald, a candidate who may replace Nessel.

McDonald is the prosecutor in a wealthy suburban county north of Detroit. McDonald also received the highest level of corporate donations from the state’s largest businesses and executives, and is viewed as the establishment choice to replace Nessel.

Advertisement

McDonald is also receiving significant backing from donors that include prolific GOP contributors and those connected to pro-Israel organizations in metro Detroit, as well as from national organizations like Friends of the Israeli Defense Forces and AIPAC. The regents and pro-Israel donors have contributed at least $200,000 to McDonald’s campaign, according to state and federal campaign donation records reviewed by Drop Site.

McDonald has reportedly raised $840,000 in donations so far—more than the other four candidates combined. An analysis of campaign finance records shows donations of at least $2,500, meaning it is likely the pro-Israel donations to her are higher.

State records show significant donations from the three U-M regents most closely tied to Nessel, who led the attack against campus protesters. Those donations include nearly $11,000 from regents Jordan Acker and Mark Bernstein, who have belonged to pro-Israel groups like the Jewish Federation, American Jewish Committee, and Hillel. Bernstein twice referred to pro-Palestinian advocates as “an antisemetic mob,” including after his home was vandalized with anti-Israel graffiti, and Acker said the protests demonstrate that “antisemitism runs rampant” on campus.

Regent Denise Illitch, part of the Little Caesar’s Pizza billionaire family, donated the maximum allowed by a single individual of nearly $8,400.

Records show a diverse range of large donations from state and national pro-Israel figures, including $37,500 from the family of Gary Torgow, a prominent Michigan bank executive, prolific campaign donor, and president of the Jewish Federation of North America.

Advertisement

While opinions of each person included in the campaign donation analysis aren’t known, they are affiliated with pro-Israel activists or groups in metro Detroit. Many are associated with the Jewish Federation of Detroit, for example, which has materially supported the Friend of the IDF, funded explicitly pro-Israel nonprofits, and criticized the use of the term “genocide” to describe Israel’s assault on Gaza.

Detroit Pistons executive Arn Tellem, who owns an Israeli basketball team, and his wife gave a combined $16,650. Tellem in December 2023 penned an op-ed critical of the Gaza protest movement.

James Bellinson, who gave nearly $8,400, is an AIPAC and major centrist Democrat donor. His wife gave $7,200 to US Rep. Shri Thanedar in November 2023, soon after the Detroit lawmaker announced he was splitting with the Democratic Socialists of America because it was critical of Israel, and he became a vocal proponent of Israel’s assault on Gaza.

Another $8,000 came from Nicole Eisenberg, who is affiliated with the Jewish Federation and recently co-executive produced a documentary on antisemitism in the US with Debra Messing. Artist Gretchen Davidson, who married into the billionaire Davidson family that since the 1940s has been a major Zionist movement funder, gave $1,000. Joan Epstein, who is part of the national Hadassah Women’s Zionist Organization of America, and who took part in a Friends of IDF fundraiser, contributed $2,500.

The donations appear to be an effort by the regents and donors to secure another pro-Israel ally in the state’s highest law enforcement office, and raises ethical questions about campaign donations to prosecutorial candidates.

Advertisement

While campaign donations are considered protected speech, prosecutorial candidates who knowingly receive donations from a complainant in a high-profile case should consider returning the donation or recusal, said Chesa Boudin, a former San Francisco district attorney who now runs the University of California at Berkeley Criminal Law and Justice Center.

“There can certainly be the appearance of impropriety… … and I would exercise my own discretion to maintain the appearance of impartiality and independence,” Boudin said.

A donation to an AG can be much more impactful than donating to a legislative candidate, Boudin added, because “there’s a much more direct connection between the outcome of the election and the issue that [the donor] is contributing for.”

In a statement, a McDonald spokesperson said she “has received support from a broad variety of Michigan residents who are looking for an attorney general who will keep our communities safe, stand up for the vulnerable, and fight to protect their rights from Donald Trump.”

“Regarding the regents, Karen has not reviewed the cases and cannot comment on the details, but believes the attorney general’s office should instead be focused on serving communities without resources,” the spokesperson said.

Advertisement

McDonald’s main opponent is Eli Savit, a progressive Jewish prosecutor in Ann Arbor. U-M’s response to protesters has been a legal controversy since late 2023, when Savit filed only minor charges against four out of 40 people arrested during a sit-in at a campus building. He also did not immediately press charges against protesters in early 2024, including those who set up an encampment. Savit declined to comment for this article.

Angered by Savit’s unwillingness to quickly crack down on the protesters, U-M’s regents executed a highly unusual move in mid-2024 in recruiting Nessel. A Guardian investigation revealed Nessel’s extensive political, financial, and personal connections to university leadership.

Six of eight regents contributed more than $33,000 combined to Nessel’s campaigns, and her office hired regent Bernstein’s law firm to handle major state cases, Bernstein co-chaired her 2018 campaign, and she has personal relationships with some regents, including Acker. Nessel also had the backing of many state pro-Israel groups. Nessel and the university have denied that she was “recruited.”

She filed charges against 11 campus protesters, but ultimately dropped the cases. A judge was preparing to hold a hearing on disqualifying the AG’s office over bias, in part because of her connections to the regents, and she would have been forced to turn over communications about why she took the cases.

In April 2025, Nessel partnered with the Trump FBI to raid homes where several student protesters lived. Nessel’s office said at the time that the raids were part of an investigation into the vandalism of homes and businesses of U-M leadership. Nessel and the Trump administration seized phones, computers and a car, but have since said nothing about the raids.

Advertisement

The next attorney general may takeover the investigation into those crimes, which has been a point of outrage for pro-Israel advocates in the region.

The new round of donations shows how far regents will go, said Drin Shapiro, a U-M student who is part of the TAHRIR Coalition, a student-led coalition of more than 90 pro-Palestine student organizations at the University of Michigan. Shapiro was charged by Nessel, but later had his cases dismissed.

“This proves that no matter what, the regents are going to try to have a foot in the door with whoever is able to slap charges on the protesters—if not Nessel then McDonald,” Shapiro said. He added that TAHRIR stays out of electoral politics and won’t be backing any of the candidates.

Shapiro said Nessel was forced to drop case against protesters over similar pro-Israel ties, and McDonald, if she investigated students, would be “doing the same thing.”

Shapiro added that “She would prosecuting pro-Palestine protesters and over stepping her jurisdiction just to serve pro-Israel interests, and particularly for regents Jordan Acker and Mark Bernstein.”

Advertisement

Leave a comment



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending