Connect with us

South Dakota

B-21 Ellsworth expansion getting mixed support in Pierre

Published

on

B-21 Ellsworth expansion getting mixed support in Pierre


BOX ELDER, S.D. – The 2024 South Dakota Legislature considered two spending measures for construction projects aimed at preparing for an influx of military personnel and civilians arriving with the launch of the new B-21 Raider bomber program at Ellsworth Air Force Base.

The state funds were proposed in one bill to help build a new elementary school to accommodate rapid student population growth in Box Elder and through another measure that would include the Rapid City Regional Airport in a funding package to aid expansion of airports across the state.

In this tight budget year, lawmakers rejected the plan to spend up to $15 million to help pay for a new $60 million elementary school in the Douglas School District, which serves many families that live and work in and around the base.

Advertisement

But as the 2024 legislative session winds down, legislators are still considering a proposal to spend up to $90 million in state funds to offset costs of expansion projects at municipal airports across the state. At the Rapid City Regional Airport, some of it could help pay for $220 million in planned improvements and expansions to prepare for expected large increases in passengers and flights due to the launch of the B-21 program at nearby Ellsworth.

Ellsworth was officially chosen in June 2021 as the main base of operations and training location for the Air Force’s new B-21 Raider bomber, a $700 million long-range stealth jet with nuclear capabilities that is intended to replace the B-1B Lancer bomber that has been based at Ellsworth for years.

BRAC memories, worries still fresh

In pitching the spending packages, lawmakers from western South Dakota argued that state financial support is needed for the school and airport projects to accommodate the B-21 program and to ensure the long-range viability of the base that was nearly closed by the federal government during the Base Realignment and Closure process in 2005-2006.

Sen. Helene Duhamel, R-Rapid City, sponsored Senate Bill 204 to help fund the proposed elementary school, starting at a $15 million request and then reducing the ask to $5 million after debate. Duhamel reminded members of the Senate Education Committee of the harrowing process South Dakota leaders went through in trying to keep Ellsworth off the final BRAC list in 2006. Duhamel said the effort required support from the South Dakota congressional delegation, state officials and local leaders to persuade the federal government to keep Ellsworth open.

Advertisement

“This did not happen by accident,” Duhamel testified. “It was hard work, investment with an eye on the future and a willingness to help when needed.”

When the 2005 BRAC process began, Ellsworth was home to about 3,500 active duty personnel, 800 civilian employees and created a $350 million annual impact in South Dakota, Duhamel said. Saving the base protected jobs and revenue across the region, and now helping the local school system and regional airport would show the Air Force that Ellsworth is valued not only within the military but by South Dakota and the local community as well, she said.

“It’s time to help again,” Duhamel said, pointing out that the annual economic impact of the base will rise to $480 million a year once the B-21s arrive. “South Dakota needs to do its part to support the military when the military supports us.”

Military wants to see local investment

Scott Landguth, executive director of the South Dakota Ellsworth Development Authority, told lawmakers that local investments are an important factor for the military when it decides whether to maintain or expand its bases. Air Force officials often ask about local “quality of life” issues, which includes the local school system, he said.

Advertisement

Ellsworth has obtained greater stability by aggressively seeking new and expanded roles within the Air Force, Landguth said. Examples include the addition of the Air Force Financial Services Center at Ellsworth in 2007, adding the command and control mission for the MQ-9 Reaper drone program to the base in 2010 and the 2015 opening of the 35,000-square-mile Powder River Training Complex, a major airspace training expansion northwest of Ellsworth.

“We’ve always been on the offensive so we’re not back to where we were (with BRAC),” Landguth said. “The quality of schools is definitely on the radar of the Air Force because they want their airmen and families to be taken care of. And they want the communities where they are investing to be part of that.”

Ellsworth colonel: Investments help ease stress

Col. Derek Oakley, commander of the 28th Bomb Wing at Ellsworth, said at a recent meeting in Rapid City that the Air Force will embark on nearly three dozen individual construction projects on the base at an estimated cost of at least $1.5 billion.

The B-21 program will add more than 4,000 new military personnel, families and civilian workers to the base over the next 20 years, bringing the total base population to nearly 12,000 people, Oakley said.

The Air Force projected in its B-21 Economic Impact Statement that development of the new bomber program at Ellsworth will create nearly 600 local jobs and almost $24 million in local economic impact. Once the bombers arrive, some state officials estimate the program will create an annual benefit of $480 million to the state.

Advertisement

As on-base preparations take off, signs of growth are visible throughout Box Elder, which for years has had strong population growth but not significant retail or commercial development. New houses and apartments are being rapidly constructed, and the town of 12,000 a few miles east of Rapid City has several new businesses already built or in progress, including a McDonald’s, a Starbucks, a Pizza Hut, new bank branches and at least two major gas station/convenience stores.

During a November luncheon hosted by the Black Hills Forum and Press Club, Oakley spoke of the importance of making sure base personnel are well cared for as they take on extended duties due to the B-21 preparations and eventual arrival.

Oakley stressed the importance of ensuring that existing airmen and airwomen, as well as the new arrivals, are not overworked or face hardships outside their work lives.

“It’s a lot to put on their backs for airmen right now,” Oakley told News Watch in an interview. “Our biggest challenge is keeping them engaged and not overworking them. We talk about mental health and taking care of our airmen on and off the base, making sure they have the right time off and things like that.”

Advertisement

South Dakota officials, lawmakers oppose school money

Many of those new military personnel have young children, and Douglas schools will have an estimated enrollment increase of 1,500 in the next 15 years, said superintendent Kevin Case.

The district has already spent $6.2 million on planning for the new elementary school, he said. The federal government is expected to pay about $40 million of the $60 million total construction cost. The district has a limited tax base upon which to draw, and sought the state money to make the deal complete, Case said.

But Morgan Gruebele, a budget analyst with the state Bureau of Finance and Management, told senators it would be unfair to provide extra state money to Douglas schools when other districts across the state are not receiving it.

She also noted that the district currently carries no debt, has an existing capital fund of $2.4 million, accepted $10 million in COVID-era funding and received $24.8 million in “impact aid” that the federal government provided Douglas in 2023 to cover lost property tax revenues due to the base’s presence in the district.

“Douglas has many funding sources,” Gruebele said in opposing the spending measure. “If the state would decide to fund the Douglas school construction, there would be many other schools wondering why they didn’t receive state support for their projects.”

Advertisement

The Senate Education Committee passed the bill on a 5-2 vote, but the Joint Appropriations Committee rejected it in an 11-7 vote.

FAA funding dip a reason for state aid to airports

As of Feb. 28, the proposal to use state funding to expedite expansion of airports statewide still had life in the Legislature.

The Joint Appropriations Committee passed Senate Bill 144 on a 15-2 vote, but lowered the funding level to $1 prior to passage. Passing the bill with no meaningful funding allows for negotiations to continue by appropriators to find a funding level that will be acceptable to the full Legislature and Gov. Kristi Noem.

Initially, the measure would have provided $90 million over five years for airport projects that the state Aeronautics Commission deemed appropriate. The sponsor submitted an amendment cutting the spending to $30 million, but appropriators so far have not decided on a spending level.

Advertisement

Airport officials told lawmakers the state money is needed because funding from the Federal Aviation Administration has been stagnant and is not sufficient to make expensive improvements needed to accommodate passenger growth, especially in the Sioux Falls and Rapid City markets.

The Sioux Falls Airport Authority in 2022 approved a $170 million, two-phase plan to add eight new gates to the airport as well as other improvements, including a concourse expansion. State money is needed to help pay for those improvements, Sioux Falls Regional Airport executive director Dan Letellier told lawmakers.

$220M plan includes more California flights

The Rapid City Regional Airport in late 2023 embarked on a three-phase expansion effort estimated to cost $220 million over the next few years, according to Megan Johnson, spokeswoman for the airport.

The first phase, now underway, would redo the aging baggage handling and Transportation Security Administration checkpoint areas at a cost of $83 million, Johnson said. Future projects would add five new gates and upgrades to the rental and baggage claim areas, she said.

Johnson told News Watch that the airport expansion is driven by steadily rising passenger counts in recent years but also due to the expectation that departures and arrivals will need to increase to accommodate growth from the B-21 program.

Advertisement

“We certainly expect an influx of travelers, families and support personnel due to the base,” she said. “I would say that the state funding is critical if you want to expand the airports because federal funding doesn’t cover every part of every project.”

Airport officials expect to see increased arrivals, especially from Southern California, where the B-21 planes are built. The airport recently announced the launch of a new Allegiant Airlines direct flight between Rapid City and Los Angeles that will start in June.

“When we speak to airlines, we have to provide a case for service to new cities,” Johnson said. “When we speak with airlines, we tell them, ‘Hey, we have Ellsworth Air Force Base and they’re bringing in these new jets.’”



Source link

Advertisement

South Dakota

How a ‘South Dakota kid’ became one of only three kickers to reach football immortality

Published

on

How a ‘South Dakota kid’ became one of only three kickers to reach football immortality


Karen Guregian’s football analysis is sponsored by Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers, a Leading Boston Personal Injury Firm.

SAN FRANCISCO – Adam Vinatieri, the man with ice water in his veins with the game on the line, the kicker who chased down All-American sprinter Hershel Walker, said he was a bit nervous heading onto the stage to join this exclusive club.

Hearing his name, learning that he was headed to the shrine that honors the NFL’s very best, brought Vinatieri, arguably the greatest kicker of All-Time, to tears.

After getting a disappointing call last year and learning he wasn’t getting his ticket to Canton, the Patriots legendary kicker wasn’t sure how to feel this time around when he was a finalist for the 2026 Pro Football Hall of Fame class.

Advertisement

“So this year my expectations, I try not to have any, you know, I really was sitting there going, well, maybe it happens, maybe it doesn’t,” Vinatieri said. “Just being nominated and being in the finals with these guys, I look at that list and I go, ‘My gosh, how do you cut that down to 4 or 5 guys because it’s it’s a pretty amazing list?’

“So when I got the knock on the door. I will be the first one to admit I got teary eyed, and choked ‘em back a little bit because, just because of what it means, you know?”

It hit Vinatieri, especially after hearing his name announced with fellow inductees Drew Brees, Larry Fitzgerald, Luke Kuechly, and Roger Craig. He said it was all incredibly “surreal” the wave of emotions he felt Thursday night during the NFL Honors ceremony.

“Even when the Hall of Famers came up and shook our hands and said congratulations, you know, joining the club, I mean, there’s just no feeling like that,” Vinatieri said after the Hall of Famers were announced.

The former Patriot, whose career spanned more than two decades, joins just two other full-time kickers, Morten Anderson and Jan Stenerud, in the football shrine.

Advertisement

It was Anderson who knocked at his door to inform him he had been voted in during his second try.

“It’s a tough position to get in, but, yeah, you know, I never really thought about it too much while I was playing,” Vinatieri said. “I just wanted to keep on stacking, stacking stats, and it was never really about me and what I was doing.

“It was always about trying to help the team win games and how can we get to the playoffs and how can we get to another championship and all that stuff and then I guess once you’re done then you turn around and you look back on it and go that’s pretty awesome.”

Vinatieri started his career with the Patriots as an undrafted rookie of Bill Parcells. He was with the team for 10 seasons (19956-2005), before moving on with the Indianapolis Colts.

He was part of three Super Bowl winning teams with the Patriots, and one with the Colts.

Advertisement

“You know, with these guys, just to say you did it a long time and you did a pretty good job and got to put a couple exclamations on a couple of games was a wonderful experience for me,” he said, “but, those 10 years in New England, there was nothing like it … we built a dynasty, winning a bunch of Super Bowls in a short amount of time. That was a great, great experience for me, and one that I will cherish the rest of my life.”

Vinatieri is the NFL’s all-time leading scorer (2,673 points with an NFL record 599 field goals). He made 29 game-winning kicks in 24 seasons before retiring at age 48.

He will always be remembered for his 48-yard field goal in a blizzard in Foxboro during their first Super Bowl run in 2001, considered the greatest kick of all-time.

He’s now immortalized for all of his clutch game-winning kicks for two organizations.

“I’m just a South Dakota kid, right? I never thought I’d play very long,” he said. “I never thought I’d get, you know, to whatever. So at this point right now, I just pinch myself just thinking that I’m sitting up here with some of the greatest men to ever put a put a football uniform on and to be in the same class, to be, to be bound to these guys for the rest of my life. It’s just, it’s really, really humbling for me.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Bill to bring every school district opt-out to an election fails in SD

Published

on

Bill to bring every school district opt-out to an election fails in SD


Thirty-nine legislators voted against a bill Feb. 4 in the South Dakota House of Representatives that would’ve brought every single school district opt-out to a public vote.

After Senate Bill 85 failed to pass, with 29 lawmakers voting for it and two excused, bill sponsor Rep. John Hughes, R-Sioux Falls, said he intended the bill to be reconsidered in the coming days, meaning the bill could’ve been heard again Feb. 5.

But by the time the House reconvened that day with SB 85 on the docket, Hughes didn’t choose to move to have the bill reconsidered.

He told the Argus Leader, in emails shortly after the bill was mentioned on the House floor, that it wouldn’t be reconsidered, and it’s most likely the case that the bill will remain dead. But that other bills affecting opt-outs are pending, and amendments could come forward.

Advertisement

Opt-outs allow school districts to raise additional operating funds beyond what they get in their existing tax levy, and in state aid, by “opting out” of those limitations to collect more taxes from property owners in the district.

“Only time will tell how this issue works itself out and whether a mandatory referral requirement will reappear in some other bill,” Hughes told the Argus Leader.

Bill sponsor skeptical of trust in school administrators

Hughes would’ve had an uphill battle to change minds and flip votes, as many of the legislators who spoke in opposition to the bill staunchly defended education, local control and the financial decisions made by superintendents, school boards and school districts.

Those legislators cited the fact that only 14 districts passed opt-outs over the last year, with five of those being referred to an election, and all five passing.

Advertisement

SB 85 is one of 19 recommendations brought by the comprehensive property tax task force that met over the summer. Sen. Sue Peterson, R-Sioux Falls, brought both the bill and the recommendation, both opposed by the Sioux Falls School District (SFSD). Peterson said it was not a “silver bullet,” but part of the solution to solve the property tax problem in the state.

Peterson has also brought SB 223, which would require petitioners to gather only 50 signatures in 40 days to refer an opt-out to an election. The bill has been referred to the Senate State Affairs committee.

Hughes noted Feb. 4 that last year’s resolution to convene the task force was approved by 64 Representatives.

Advertisement

“One thing we have all seen from the floor vote on SB 85, the House in 2025-2026 thus far is talking out of both sides of its mouth on property tax reform and relief, and the voters should take that into consideration in June and November, if this session continues its present course on property taxes, and that we should just ‘trust the school administrations’ in South Dakota,” Hughes said in a statement Feb. 5.

Sioux Falls was a focal point of the bill

In House debate Feb. 4 and in the bill’s prior hearings, it was clear the most recent opt-out passed by the SFSD Board of Education, and the inability of petition circulators to gather enough signatures to bring the proposal to a vote, was a flashpoint that led to the bill’s creation.

That opt-out for $2.1 million over 10 years — or $21 million — needed 5,490 signatures to be referred to voters, but only 2,302 signatures were turned in by the deadline, in 20 days.

One of the most outspoken petitioners, Misty Furness, noted the cost for the district to hold an opt-out election — $63,000 — is far less than $21 million, and said SB 85 is about giving taxpayers a voice.

Peterson said Jan. 22 in the bill’s first hearing in the Senate Education committee that it shouldn’t be the responsibility of voters to gather petition signatures to prevent districts from spending over the limits that have been set for them.

Advertisement

During the Sioux Falls school board’s work session Feb. 4, shortly before the House started debating SB 85, school board president Nan Kelly said the bill wouldn’t solve the property tax issue “in any real meaningful way,” and said opt-outs have historically been used to fill the gap between what’s available in state and local funding, and what’s needed.

District business manager Todd Vik noted the Legislature increased state aid to education at only 1.25% last year and is proposing no increase this year, and said SB 85 will make it “much more difficult to opt out.”

Kelly said the bill sets a “very dangerous precedent” and could lead to similar legislation being proposed for cities and counties.

That’s something SFSD lobbyist Sam Nelson brought up in his testimony against the bill in the House Education committee Feb. 2, arguing that if proponents believed SB 85 was good for schools, it should be good for all local units of government, including the general bill and special appropriations passed by legislators.

Advertisement

Part of the reason opt-outs are in place is that “for years, we have not adequately funded public education, which is your constitutional obligation to do,” Nelson told the House Education committee on Feb. 2.

He noted that people who disagree with opt-outs or other decisions made by school board members have two ways to deal with it: showing up at school board meetings and making public comments, or “one of the greatest referendum tools,” the ballot box.

Rep. Brian Mulder, R-Sioux Falls, said he’d heard from SFSD that only one person made public comments on the budget cycle, and only two people emailed Superintendent Jamie Nold about the budget, noting that people already have the opportunity to influence school board and district decisions.

Districts ‘glibly ignore spending limits,’ proponents argue

In prior committee hearings, SB 85 was endorsed by lobbyists for the Freedom Foundation and Americans for Prosperity.

Advertisement

Legislators who spoke in favor of SB 85 Feb. 4 largely argued that taxpaying voters need to have a say in opt-outs that school boards want to pass, and that part of “local control” is for local school board voters to be part of decisions in their local school districts.

Hughes had argued that a number of school districts across the state “glibly ignore spending limits.”

In his rebuttal, he said his sons shouldn’t have to go to school board meetings and “plow through budgets” that make “all of us gloss over.”

He also said that in December, Nold gave a “wonderful defense for everything he’s doing to continue, according to the status quo,” and said that if legislators don’t pass SB 85, “we ought to just give everybody a trophy and go home.”

Advertisement

Rep. Terri Jorgenson, R-Rapid City, argued SB 85 is not about schools or education funding, but about taxpayers’ consent. She said there are 79 active opt-outs across the state levying $43 million in excess property taxes.

SB 85 takes tools out of education’s toolbox, opponents argued

In prior committee hearings, SB 85 was opposed by lobbyists for the Sioux Falls School District, Rapid City Area Schools, Associated School Boards of South Dakota, School Administrators of South Dakota, South Dakota Education Association, South Dakota United School Association, the Large School Group and the Greater Sioux Falls Chamber of Commerce.

Since the petition group in Sioux Falls didn’t gather enough signatures, ASBSD lobbyist Heath Larson said it’s possible local constituents were supportive of the district and trusted what school board members were doing.

Large School Group lobbyist Dianna Miller argued that putting a mandate like SB 85 on schools isn’t “limited government,” and said that the property tax problem shouldn’t be “solved on the backs of school districts” alone, something Rep. Mike Stevens repeated on the House floor.

Advertisement

Reps. Erik Muckey, Jim Halverson, Tim Walburg, William Shorma, Roger DeGroot, Keri Weems, Stevens and Mulder all spoke against the bill on the House floor.

DeGroot said school districts pass opt-outs because “we’re not doing our job here,” referring to legislators’ power to increase education funding in Pierre. He added the lack of a proposed increase in state aid to education this year “makes absolutely no sense to me at all.”

Stevens said all legislators do recently is “take tools out” of education’s toolbox, and that if SB 85 passed, “there’d be no more tools in that toolbox.” He noted districts must publish public notices and hold public hearings when school boards plan to vote on or pass opt-outs.

Walburg said he trusts his superintendent and school board members, and that the state shouldn’t dictate what they can do. He noted that 57% of his property tax bill went to schools, which he said was about $265 twice a year.

Halverson said one of the superintendents in his legislative district had asked him to vote no and respect local control. Weems also said constituents in her district value what their property tax does for education, and that she voted against the bill and in favor of local control.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

South Dakota’s most romantic restaurants for a memorable date night

Published

on

South Dakota’s most romantic restaurants for a memorable date night



Where to take your Valentine? Here are a few restaurants in South Dakota with ambiance made for first kisses and memorable nights.

It should feel like the entire restaurant was made for two.

Advertisement

Some of the most romantic restaurants in South Dakota have barely lit corners for kisses, velvet couches to snuggle into and a good wine list to make your Valentine swoon.

Here’s a look at some memorable, fairy tale dinners. Note: Don’t look at the prices when you make this reservation; the impassioned ambiance is worth the cost for this one.

Minerva’s Restaurant

Cozy booths, sparkly chandeliers and friendly maître d’s make up this historical corner of downtown Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Minerva’s has been open since 1977, but the establishment has been well-known since 1917, when it was first a confectionery and then a creperie. The nostalgia holds strong with a sprawling salad bar today, Santee bison steaks and a decadent chocolate soufflé for two.

Details: 301 S. Phillips Ave., Sioux Falls, S.D., 605-334-0386. Hours are 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. Monday through Saturday, 4:30 to 9 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 4:30 to 10 p.m. Friday and Saturday. Visit minervas.net.

Advertisement

Parker’s Bistro

Another historic building giving remarkable charm in Sioux Falls, Parker’s Bistro has exposed brick walls like a hug around white linen tabletops, glimmering candles and fresh flowers. (Tip: There’s a flower shop nearby. Stop there first.) It’s very intimate in there, with corner nooks on one side and an upscale bar next door with velvet couches near the windowfront. All of it hints at the first kiss.

Details: 210 S. Main Ave., Sioux Falls, S.D., 605-250-1322. Hours are 4:30 to 9 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 4:30 to 10 p.m. Friday and Saturday. Visit parkersbistro.net.

R Wine Bar

Italiano is spelled a-m-o-r-e.

Advertisement

Owners Riccardo and Marybeth Tarabelsi brought a romantic nighttime-in-Florence experience to downtown Sioux Falls with four upscale establishments, including R Wine Bar, Maribella Ristorante, Brix Wine Bar and Trio Jazz Club. If you really want to impress your date, squeeze it all into one date night, progressive dinner style.

R Wine Bar was first to open, introducing a large wine menu featuring Penfolds or Caymus from Napa Valley and an Antinori Tignanello Chianti from Classico, Italy. Appetizers include mussels and ceviche; dinner includes pasta al limone, Champagne chicken or Gorgonzola steak and gnocchi.

There’s always jazz music in the corner.

Details: 322 E. Eighth St., Sioux Falls, S.D., 605-271-0814. Hours are 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. and 3 to 10 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. and 3 to 11 p.m. Friday and Saturday. Visit RWineBar.com.

Advertisement

Legend’s Steakhouse

A legendary dinner for a legendary date night. The Legends Steakhouse is on the upper floor of the Silverado Franklin Hotel in Deadwood, South Dakota, and is notorious for its guests like presidents Teddy Roosevelt and William Howard Taft. Babe Ruth enjoyed the hotel bar, too.

Deadwood has so much kitschy history to love.

At the Silverado, it’s raucous at the casino downstairs, but quiet in the restaurant upstairs with a private dinner vibe, soft music barely there and lobster or steak Oscar for dinner.

Details: 709 Main St., Deadwood, S.D., 605-578-3670. Hours are 7:30 to 11 a.m. Sunday through Thursday and 5 to 9 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 7:30 to 11 a.m. and 5 to 10 p.m. Friday and Saturday. Visit silveradofranklin.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending